Premium Essay

Most Dangerous Game Comparison

Submitted By
Words 1132
Pages 5
The story "The Most Dangerous Game" by Richard Connel and the movie The Most Dangerous Game are alike in some ways, but different in many others.

In the story "The Most Dangerous Game," Rainsford feel off the ship while trying to go through a channel. The lights were shifted which caused the ship to sink. He swam to the shore when he realized he was the only survivor. When he reached shore he heard this horrible scream and then three gunshots followed. Nearby in the bushes there was an indention that looked like something had fallen in the bushes. Rainsford kept walking when he found a house. He lifted the knocker and let it fall. The door opened and there was a big man standing in the doorway holding a long-barreled revolver and pointing …show more content…
His name is General Zaroff. Zaroff knew Rainsford because of the books Rainsford had wrote about his hunting experiences. Zaroff offered Rainsford food, clothes, and a place to sleep. While at dinner the men discussed hunting. General Zaroff was a big hunter himself. Zaroff told Rainsford about his hunting and how he became bored with it because he didn't feel he had a real bug competition. He moved to this island and found a new animal to hunt. One that was actually a challenge. Zaroff wanted an animal that could reason, but there isn't one. So now he hunts people. When people shipwreck they always find Zaroff's house because he is the only one on the island. He takes them in because they need a place to stay, but then he asks them to go hunting with him and if they say no then they have to play a game with Ivan. Ivan is the man who opened the door for Rainsford with a gun. Playing a game with Ivan is more painful than hunting so everybody choose hunting. In this game the person has three days to stay to be hunted by Zaroff. If Zaroff does not kill them by the third day at midnight then they when the game and can live. Nobody has won yet. After that Rainsford went to sleep. The next morning Rainsford told Zaroff he …show more content…
Rainsford was the only survivor so he decided to swim to shore. He came to a house. When he knocked on the door it opened, but nobody was there. When Rainsford walked in the door shut behind him and a man was standing there. The man would not speak, but just stare at Rainsford. Another man, known as General Zaroff, walked down the stairs. He informed Rainsford that the man's name is Ivan and he is deaf. Zaroff took Rainsford into a room where there was a man and woman. They were brother and sister and they had a shipwreck also. Zaroff allowed Rainsford to stay at his house like the other man and woman. Zaroff told them about his hunting, but wouldn't tell them his new big game that he hunts on the island. That night Zaroff wanted to take the man hunting. The man had been drinking so he thought it was going to be fun, but Zaroff's big game was humans. That night the man's sister came and got Rainsford from his room and said that her brother still hasn't came back and she was worried. She asked Rainsford to help look so they went downstairs. They walked up on Zaroff and his assistants. The woman asked where her brother was and there was a black bag in the shape of a body and she knew what had happened. Zaroff then captured the woman and Rainsford. He said he wanted to go hunting with Rainsford so Ivan gave Rainsford food and a knife.

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Comparison and Contrast of "The Child by Tiger" and "The Most Dangerous Game"

...Rivera 1 Marcos G. Rivera Prof. Lauren Lund English 102 14 July 2013 Comparison and Contrast of “The Child by Tiger” and “The Most Dangerous Game” The short story “The Child by Tiger” by Thomas Wolfe is a about a religious, talented Negro named Dick Prosser who served in the army and is the servant of a middle class family in the south. This story takes a shocking turn when Dick goes on a killing spree throughout the town and a mob finally reaches him and kills him with no remorse. In Richard Connell’s “The Most Dangerous Game”, Sanger Rainsford falls off of a yacht that was heading towards the Amazon for a hunting trip. He swims to an island where he finds himself being the hunted by General Zaroff an aristocrat who had dominated the sport of hunting to the point that he became so bored, he purchased the island to specifically hunt men. None of these men survived his game. That is until Rainsford has no choice but to also participate in this game. At some point of each story, the animalistic act of man hunting man is witnessed. In “The Child by Tiger” Wolfe demonstrates that no matter how strong a person may be mentally, a human will sooner or later have a breaking point. The author in this story may also be trying to make the reader understand how society or environment a person is surrounded by may sometimes lead an individual to commit such horrendous acts of violence. Dick Prosser is seen as a gentle person who suddenly goes through a rampage...

Words: 1102 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

High Noon And The Most Dangerous Game Comparison

...face a gang of killers by himself. Will Kane, being the main character, is all alone in this mission and is stuck in this town in the middle of no where. He has now where to go with his newly-wed wife. It is a very suspenseful black and white movie with great actors. However, "The Most Dangerous Game" has a similar plot. It's about the main character, Rainsford, falls off of his yacht while sailing to Africa to hunt Jaguars. He swims to the abandoned island called Ship Trap Island. He meets General Zaroff who lives in the island alone and hunts humans. He got bored of hunting animals so he moved onto...

Words: 803 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Richard Zaroff The Most Dangerous Game Comparison Essay

...In the short story “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell Zaroff sets people up from boat wrecks and hunts them like animals. Rainsford states, “the world is made up of two classes -- the hunters and the huntees.” I think there are more types of people in the world than two. In the story the author presented two hunters, Rainsford, and Zaroff. Zaroff thinks its ok to hunt humans if he gives them exercise, food, and water. In the book Rainsford is the real hunter and Whitney proves it. “ I’ve seen you pick off a mouse moving in the brown fall bush at four hundred yards, but even you can’t see four miles or so through a moonless caribbean night”. Rainsford hunts dangerous animals like jaguars and Lions. The story proves to us Zaroff is also a hunter. “ I’ve read your books about hunting snow leopards in Tibet, You see”. Later in the story Zaroff says he hunts humans. Zaroff likes hunting humans because they give up a good fight and got bored of hunting animals. He also hunts humans to teach them a lesson....

Words: 474 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Fiction Essay

...self-centered people that are only looking out for themselves and what benefits them. Besides that, they have no true value of other humans life as long as it is not effecting their own. Of course it is wrong, but it seems that as time continues it just gets worse and worse. Will it ever stop? Probably not and that is what’s scary. The two stories “The Lottery” and “The Most Dangerous Game” both exemplify characteristics of selfishness, violence and cruelty throughout different scenarios. Both stories are ones which could happen in today’s world, they may not be the most common situations, but they are very much possible. Comparing and contrasting these two stories, it becomes quite interesting how these are things that could very easily be real life because people like these characters do exist. The news is a reminder everyday and even in the Bible, there are so many instances where these acts are frowned upon. To not kill is even one of the Ten Commandments. Life is by far the most precious gift that we have been given from God, when he asks for so little in return. “The Lottery” and “The Most Dangerous Game” show how low and deceiving humans can truly be. They show us that people are capable of very hateful things and you never know when they may turn their back on you. That is why a good relationship with God...

Words: 1473 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Lottery vs. the Most Dangerous Game

...Adrienne Wesley Fiction Essay 201420 Spring 2014 ENG 102 D44 LUO April 6, 2014 Nathan Valle, professor Thesis Statement: The Lottery and The Most Dangerous Game are stories that demonstrate man’s fascination with evil and how they delight in the destruction of human life I. The setting of The Lottery paints the picture of a civilized society. A. The story takes place in June B. The village has places representative of civilization a. A bank b. Schools c. Post office II. The Mood of the story is light and provides no insight to the tragedy about to unfold A. The people act as if the lottery is a time of joy B. There is no evidence of the stoning C. The villagers seem light hearted and jovial D. They make jokes as they assemble for the lottery III. The Characters are influenced by their setting A. The lottery is a tradition B. People participate in the lottery just because it is a tradition C. No one opposes the lottery, all are willing participants D. Other villages have stopped the tradition E. Setting makes story outcome unbelievable IV. The Most Dangerous Game takes place in a jungle on an island and General Zaroff’s home A. Ship-Trap Island , an island known for its reputation B. The Island seems civilized C. Different from The Lottery because the reader believes there could be danger D. Setting gives the reader a false sense of security a. Basic needs (food...

Words: 1311 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

The Most Dangerous Game vs the Lottery

...Introduction “The Lottery” written by Shirley Jackson and “The Most Dangerous Game” written by Richard Connell share a common theme of violence and cruelty. In “The Most Dangerous Game” humans are hunted, as mere animals, to serve as the perfect prey to satisfy a desire for challenge. In “The Lottery” the townspeople are forced to participate in a ritual that will result in the death of an unwilling participant to satisfy a belief that the sacrifice of one of their own will guarantee a bountiful harvest. By comparison, the elements of violence and cruelty demonstrate the self-centeredness that abounds in each story. The Taking of Life for Personal Satisfaction In “The Most Dangerous Game,” Connell depicts Rainsford, the protagonist of the story, as a seasoned hunter. Through a conversation with his friend Whitney, the reader learns of Rainsford’s lack of sympathy for his prey, despite Whitney’s assertion that the prey has a complete understanding of fear, “the fear of pain and the fear of death” (Connell, 2010). This information reveals to the reader Rainsford’s matter-of-fact attitude toward the emotions of the hunter and the hunted. Through a twist of fate, Rainsford is stranded on an island, which he is drawn to by gun fire after falling off a boat, where he encounters General Zaroff. Zaroff is initially portrayed as an accommodating host, offering Rainsford food, clothing, and a place to rest. The two men discuss their various hunting ventures and, through...

Words: 904 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

The Dangerous Game

...This essay examines the villains from “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell and “The Destructors” by Graham Green. By comparison and contrast, it is found that Trevor and General Zaroff possess different temperaments and behavioral traits, and yet have many similarities in method, background, and morality. Both villains are motivated by boredom and a need to express their superiority.  Many parallels can be drawn from “The Most Dangerous Game” byRichard Connell and “The Destructors” by Graham Greene, especially between Trevor and General Zaroff. Both of them are flat characters and both are the villains of the stories in which they reside. Trevor is the protagonist of “The Destructors” and General Zaroff is the antagonist of “The Most Dangerous Game.” Trevor and General Zaroff posses different temperaments and behavioral traits, and yet have many similarities in method, background, and morality. Both villains are motivated by boredom and a need to express their superiority. General Zaroff is an older, white-haired gentleman who is affable, hospitable, and good natured, while Trevor is a young gang member who is brooding and silent. General Zaroff is a hunter, and as such is a man of action – he enjoys the chase, the hunt. The boy prefers to sit quietly while planning and scheming. Trevor does not show even “the smallest flicker of glee” (Greene, 1954), while Zaroff openly shows his amusement with the game by smiling when he finds Rainsford in a tree, and by verbally stating...

Words: 814 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Fiction

...Thesis statement: Outline: I. Compare the murder of innocent people A. The Lottery, Tessie dies for picking the marked paper. 1. Killed by a stoning of her peers B. The Most Dangerous Game, Zaroff dies playing a game. 1. Zaroff was the hunter ended up dying as the hunted. II. Contrast why they were murdered. A. The Lottery, Tessie was murdered so town can reap a reward. 1. The instinct of survival makes people very violence. B. The Most Dangerous Game, Zaroff died because he wanted to have fun. 1. Rainsford has turned into the same person as Zaroff. “The Lottery," written by Shirley Jackson and “The Most Dangerous Game," written by Richard Connell, share a common theme of violence and cruelty. In “The Most Dangerous Game” humans are hunted, as if they were animals, to satisfy an unquenchable desire for a challenge. In “The Lottery” the people of a little town is forced to participate in a ritual that will unexpectedly take the life of an unwilling participant to comply with a story that if they sacrifice of one of their own, then the residents of that little town will be guaranteed a bountiful harvest. By comparison, these two stories show us just how selfish we as people can be. Both of these stories contain violence, and murder and show that humans are selfish. “The Lottery," takes place in a small town where the traditions of sacrificing a person for their fruitful harvests are kept. Tessie is a woman who selects the marked lottery...

Words: 702 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

The Lottery and the Most Dangerous Game

...“The Lottery” and “The Most Dangerous Game” Fiction: Essay ENGL 102 Composition and Literature Liberty University Professor Rachel Downie 201540 Fall 2015 ENGL 102-D27 OUTLINE I. Introduction: a. Thesis Statement: Through scenery and characterization in “The Lottery” by Shirley Jackson and “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell, the violence in human nature is put to the test with what is right and what has become tradition. II. The Scenery: a. Scenery of lottery is so serene, peaceful, and beautiful compared to what is going to happen. b. Compare scenery of “Most Dangerous Game” with “The Lottery” c. Discuss how these two set the scene for two events that take place III. Characterization: a. Discuss the attitude of the village in “The Lottery” b. Discuss the attitude of General Zaroff in “The Most Dangerous Game” c. How these two attitudes go together and also go against each other IV. Human Nature: a. Human nature in “The Lottery” b. Human nature in “The Most Dangerous Game” c. Human nature in general V. Conclusion: a. Biblical Perspective of both stories b. Final Thoughts The cold wintery nights in contrast with the character Tiny Tim from “A Christmas Carol,” Nemo’s dad in contrast to the vast ocean and entirely too large of a world in the movie Finding Nemo, Adam and Eve in that radiant garden of Eden. All of these characterizations wildly contrast with...

Words: 1175 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

The Lottery vs the Most Dangerous Game

...values human life or anything except themselves. Not only is it wrong but the question looms, will it ever changes? The two fictional short stories, “The Lottery” and “The Most Dangerous Game” both exhibit characteristics of selfishness, cruelty and violence toward ones fellowman. These writings hold great truths because they present what could be real life situations today. In comparing and contrasting the two we find how each of these fictional works displays the aforementioned themes and so much more. It is quite interesting to read about such behaviors and actually witness them now. The news stories we see, the people we encounter, the lives we live. What is their value? What about one of God’s Ten Commandments, “Thou shalt not kill?” Life is by far the most precious gift that we have been given. The ability to feel emotions and empathize with our brothers and sisters has diminished, and it is my opinion that it will get worse. These are the times we should all stand together as God’s children, rather than turning on one another for selfish and evil reasons. “The Lottery” and “The Most Dangerous Game” show how quickly, how easily, we as humans devalue the live of another; how one person can turn on another in the blink of an eye. Outline Thesis Statement I. “The Lottery & “The Most Dangerous Game” II. What Does the Bible Say and Killing? III. Conclusion In comparing and...

Words: 1159 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Crime and Punishment

...Crime and Punishment Outline I. Introduction A. “What if man is not really a scoundrel, man in general, I mean, the whole race of mankind -- then all the rest is prejudice, simply artificial terrors and there are no barriers and it's all as it should be." Fyodor Dostoevsky, Crime and Punishment. B. In the short stories, The Most Dangerous Game by Richard Connell and The Destructors by Graham Greene, we will look at the similarities and differences in the characterization element of fiction as they relate to the crimes committed in the stories. II. Body A. The Most Dangerous Game by Richard Connell 1. Characters 2. Qualities and Motivations B. The Destructors by Graham Greene 1. Characters 2. Qualities and Motivations C. Comparisons of the Short Stories 1. The Most Dangerous Game crime 2. The Destructors crime III. Conclusion A. In the end of these two stories, “justice” was served. B. As the protagonists of the short stories, Rainsford and Trevor succeeded in “punishing” General Zaroff and Mr. Thomas for the crimes they committed while they in turn committed crimes themselves. Crime and Punishment “What if man is not really a scoundrel, man in general, I mean, the whole race of mankind-then all the rest is prejudice, simply artificial terrors and there are no barriers and it's all as it should be." Fyodor Dostoevsky, Crime and Punishment. When a crime is committed usually punishment...

Words: 1099 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Essay on 'the Most Dangerous Game'

...John Swenson English 11 1st Hour Comparison/Contrast Essay In this essay of comparison and contrast there will be comparisons and contrasts- or in other words similarities and differences- in Jack London’s “To Build A Fire” and Richard Connell’s, “The Most Dangerous Game”. The comparisons will be constructed of the settings, characters, and conflict. First topic to be compared is conflict. The two stories share two conflicts, a struggle for survival. In Jack London’s “To Build A Fire” the main character, not named, thinks in his head, “Without doubt he would lose some fingers and toes and some of his face…” (London 703). In the same manner, the main character, named Rainsford, kills a dog and the “bad guy” says to him “… I’ll see what you can do against my whole pack” (Connell 28). However, the two stories differ in what they struggle against. In “To Build A Fire” the conflict is person versus nature. For example the guy builds a fire and from the spruce tree falls some snow and puts out the fire; to quote “He should not have built the fire under the spruce tree” (London 700). Meanwhile, in “The Most Dangerous Game” the conflict is person versus person which is Rainsford being hunted down by General Zaroff-the “bad guy”- in the middle of a baron island. To quote from General Zaroff “Your strength and stamina against mine” (Connell 24). Secondly, literary item number two is setting. In both stories the setting is set in isolated places. Like in “To Build A Fire” its...

Words: 561 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

The Most Dangerous Game Literary Analysis

...The “Most Dangerous Game” was written in 1924 by Richard Connell. In the beginning, after Rainsford falls off his ship and winds up on an ominous island, he meets the affable General Zaroff. At first, Zaroff appears to a very affable person, although Rainsford soon finds out that Zaroff is actually sadistic. To clarify, Rainsford discovers that Zaroff takes joy out of hunting humans for sport. With this in mind, Zaroff spurs on an interesting game of cat and mouse with Rainsford. Symbols, foreshadows, and allusions create suspense for the reader while reading the story. These literary devices all help move the story forward as well as keep the reader on edge. Throughout the story Connell uses symbols to keep readers interested. For example,...

Words: 992 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Rebt and Rcct

...In Comparison to the story The Rocking Horse Winner, by DH Lawrence, The Most Dangerous Games by Richard Connell, both carried themes of unhappiness, greed and insanity. Driven by the desire to find happiness, characters in both plots went to inhumane extremity to satisfy their uncontrollable yearning for peace of mind. In the story The Rocking Horse Winners, unhappiness spread through the household like a terrible plaque, infesting every member of the family unit individually, some more than others. The main characters that were severely plague were the young son Paul, more so than his mother. Paul state of mind was triggered from his mother-camouflaged unhappiness from believing that she was an unlucky woman. She successfully misleads the general public into believing that she is the perfect mother with a good life, though those within the house knew better. She tried hard to fit into prominent societies; where she befriends people with significant statues to fit in their standing. Since she associates riches with luck and she was poor, she drew the conclusion that she was unlucky. This was express several times in conversation between Paul and herself. “I use to think I was lucky…. before I was married”, indicate that at one point she had riches which she probable after she marry her husband. Being severely distraught by his mothers’ unhappiness, Paul decided to seek solitude in his room with his rocking horse. Doing this he would elude reality and try immensely to...

Words: 902 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

The Most Dangerous Game General Zaroff Character Analysis

...Readers are intrigued by danger, suspense and the thrill of a story. In “ The Most Dangerous Game” written by Richard Connell the short story proves danger, suspense and thrill add to a story. General Zaroff, character of the famous short story, is a Russian Cossack and expatriate who lives on Ship-Trap Island and enjoys hunting men. Unfortunately, Sanger Rainsford, the main character is getting hunted by General; this is the main conflict. General Zaroff is an aggressive, uncivilized and confident man, Richard Connell proves he is the antagonist of this short narrative. “The Most Dangerous Game” proves General Zaroff is an aggressive individual an example of this proves in the short story: “ When I shot some of his prized turkeys with it, he did not punish me; he complimented me on my marksmanship. I killed my first bear in the...

Words: 930 - Pages: 4