Free Essay

Neoliberalism & Mexico

In: Historical Events

Submitted By caleyp
Words 908
Pages 4
Over the last few decades, research has shown a clear connection between the ideals of neoliberalism and social inequality. According to A Brief History of Neoliberalism, neoliberalism is defined as a theory of political economic practices that proposes that human well-being can best be advanced by liberating individual entrepreneurial freedoms and skills within an institutional framework characterized by strong property rights, free markets, and free trade. Beginning in the 1970s and 1980s as political philosophy rooted in classical liberalism with a focus on free markets and economic growth, the definition of neoliberalism has changed quite a bit over the last few decades. The evolutionary dynamic of neoliberaliztion has been such as to force adaptations that have varied greatly from place to place as well as over time. Any attempt to piece together a picture of what a typical neoliberal state looks like today would prove to be a difficult task. The somewhat chaotic evolution and uneven geographical development of state institutions, powers, and functions over the last thirty years suggests that the neoliberal state may be an unstable contradictory political form. The effects of this economic philosophy are especially obvious in Latin America, where many nations faced debt crises directly related to neoliberalism. The overall result was an awkward mix of low growth and increasing income inequality. In Latin America, where the first wave of forced neoliberalization struck in the early 1980s, the result was for the most part a whole ‘lost decade’ of economic stagnation and political turmoil. It can be concluded that forced neoliberalism in Latin America has led to an obvious increase in social inequality, but more specifically, forced neoliberalism in Mexico has led to a country full of impoverished citizens who lack economic and social stability. In 1984 the World Bank granted its first-ever loan in history. Mexico was hit hard during the global crisis of the 1970s, but the new combination of the IMF, the World Bank, and the US Treasury pulled together to bail the country out of its difficulties. Once Mexico was opened to the global economy, things took a turn for the worse. Due to government problems and the re-orientation of the country’s governing economic model, state expenditure on public goods declined. Food subsidies were restricted to the poorest segments of the population, and the quality of public education and health care stagnated or declined. President De La Madrid noticed the country’s rapid descent into debt and felt the only way out was to sell off and privatize public businesses. Privatization entailed the wholesale restructuring of labor contracts and this provoked conflict. The general outcome of this is lower wages, increasing job insecurity, and in many instances loss of benefits and of job protections. Given the violent assault on all forms of labor organization and labor rights and heavy reliance upon massive but largely disorganized labor reserves in countries such as Mexico, it would seem that labor control and maintenance of a high rate of labor exploitation have been central to neoliberalization all along. The restoration of formation of class power occurs, as always, at the expense of labor.
Mexico has demonstrated a key difference between liberal and neoliberal economic practices. Under a neoliberal state, borrowers are forced by state and international powers to take on board the cost of debt repayment no matter what the consequences for the livelihood and well-being of the local population. Under President Salinas, the attack on organized labor intensified in order to conform to NAFTA. Salinas had to open the peasant sector and agriculture to foreign competition meaning only the most efficient and affluent Mexican farmers could survive and compete. Close to starvation, many peasants were forced off the land, only to augment the pool of underemployed in already overcrowded cities. The wave of privatization in Mexico after 1992 catapulted a few individuals into the elite group of the world’s wealthiest people, proving that the neoliberal turn is in some way and to some degree associated with the restoration or reconstruction of the power of economic elites.
The effect of neoliberalism on Mexico has clearly been negative. Not just economically, but socially as well. The social inequality created by neoliberalism has become a serious issue in Mexico, as well as Latin America as a whole. Privatization of once public businesses has provoked major conflict throughout the country. Citizens who were once employed as laborers, are now close to starvation and forced to compete with other unemployed individuals in already overcrowded cities. It can be safely assumed that neoliberalism in Mexico has definitely led to an increase in social inequality.

--------------------------------------------
[ 1 ]. Harvey, David. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005. 2.
[ 2 ]. Harvey, David. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005. 70.
[ 3 ]. Harvey, David. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005. 64.
[ 4 ]. Harvey, David. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005. 88.
[ 5 ]. Harvey, David. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005. 100.
[ 6 ]. Harvey, David. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005. 100.
[ 7 ]. Harvey, David. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005. 76.
[ 8 ]. Harvey, David. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005. 29.
[ 9 ]. Harvey, David. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005. 101.
[ 10 ]. Harvey, David. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005. 119.

Similar Documents

Free Essay

A Criticism of Neoliberal Policies as a Method of Development

...A Criticism of Neoliberal Policies as a Method of Development * Neoliberalism is a philosophical theory that uses market value as the primary method of evaluating all aspects of life. Thus, the market is seen as the template for all other activities within a society, even those that involve an ethical dimension. (Paul Sukys, 2009) Thesis Statement: The pro-market principles that neoliberalism encourages do have benefits that, if managed realistically, are means of development and sustainment for countries worldwide. * “The neoliberal doctrine emphasizes competition over cooperation and in doing so encourages each individual to pursue his or her own well being, thus effectively creating "companies of one" who will sell whatever they possess (talents, property, abilities, education, and so on) in order to accumulate "points," in whatever way those points may be defined within a given system.” (Jason Read, 2008) * “Neoliberalization has not been very effective in revitalizing global capital accumulation, but it has succeeded remarkably well in restoring, or in some instances (as in Russia and China) creating, the power of an economic elite...” (David Harvey, 2007) * Neoliberalism is an ideology, method of governance, and a set of policies which originated out of classical liberalism and as a backlash to Keynesianism during the early 1980’s (Steger and Roy 2010:10-11) * Neoliberal intellectuals insisted that the ‘free market’ was a superior mechanism for...

Words: 1846 - Pages: 8

Free Essay

Us Trade Policies Towards Latin America

...BLC Essay 2 Isidro Morales describes US trade policies towards Latin America as a ‘neo-liberal corporate-led agenda’. Discuss the validity of his claim, as well as the desirability of extending the model of regional integration preferred by Washington to all of the Americas. “Since trade ignores national boundaries and the manufacturer insists on having the world as a market, the flag of his nation must follow him, and the doors of the nations which are closed against him must be battered down. Concessions obtained by financiers must be safeguarded by ministers of state, even if the sovereignty of unwilling nations be outraged in the process. Colonies must be obtained or planted, in order that no useful corner of the world may be overlooked or left unused.” Woodrow Wilson, President of the United States, 1919 Madalina Daniela Costache Robert Ibsen British and American Studies – 2XBF November 8th 2013 Number of words: 938 With the emergence of the Washington consensus, the US foreign policy shifted towards a neoliberal model in order to deal with the pressures incited by globalization. Neoliberal theory argues for the development of a free market economy where there is a high degree of free individual choice, and which achieves efficient economic performance by reducing the state’s intervention solely to “defining property rights, enforcing contracts, and regulating the money supply” (Kotz 2000). This essay argues that, as Morales claims, the US does pursue a...

Words: 1193 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Liberalism for Development

...Liberalism for World Development Hubert H. Humprey stated that liberalism, above all, means emancipation - emancipation from one's fears, his inadequacies, from prejudice, from discrimination, from poverty. That could not be further from the truth in the world of economy. Collaboration and agreements among countries are very important in today’s world development. Economies that have remained closed from the rest of the world have not been able to attain and sustain growth. Many developing countries have gained competitive advantages and growth by implementing open market and trade liberalization. Only through liberalism can economic potential be unleashed. Trace back to origin of liberalism, the Italian merchants wanted more freedom and rights and encouraged free trade in order to move towards a more liberal, innovative system. We will show you that free trade and innovation are the only viable and compatible models for development. We will also show that inevitably the world is moving towards embracing the liberal model. South Korea and Chile are two countries that transformed their economies from the poorest to the one of the best performers. They were both politically ruled under authoritarian regime but later on they all adopted liberal economy. In South Korea, post economic reform, their economy went to another level. GDP hits $1 trillion in 2007. South Korea is one of the fastest growing economies in the world, a huge contrast to its northern neighbor...

Words: 910 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

'Laissez-Faire, Laissez-Passer

...Chapter 3 - ''Laissez-Faire, Laissez-passer''. Liberalism suffers from something of a personality disorder. The term means different things in different contexts. In the United States today, for example, a liberal is general regarded as one who believes in an active role for the state in society such as helping the poor and funding programs to address social problems. For economic liberals (also referred to as neoliberals and sometimes as neocon1 the state should play a limited, knot constricted, role in the economy and society. In other relatives ), words, today's economic liberals have much in common with people who are usually referred to as ''conservatives'' in the United States and many other countries. ROOTS OF THE ECONOMIC LIBERAL The liberal perspective today reveals many insights about political economy that mercantilists miss or do not address. Although liberals believe that people are fundamentally self-interested, they do not see this as a disadvantage because broad areas of society are set up in such a way that competing interests can engage one another.  Today's economic liberalism is rooted in reactions to important trends and events in Europe in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. Fratxois Quesnay (1694-1774) led a group of French philosophers called the Physiocrats or Qs economist's. Quesnay condemned government interference in the market, holding that, with few exceptions, it brought harm to society. PERSPECTIVE For the laissez-faire world...

Words: 2486 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

The Essence of Neoliberalism

...The essence of neoliberalism | As the dominant discourse would have it, the economic world is a pure and perfect order, implacably unrolling the logic of its predictable consequences, and prompt to repress all violations by the sanctions that it inflicts, either automatically or - more unusually - through the intermediary of its armed extensions, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) and the policies they impose: reducing labour costs, reducing public expenditures and making work more flexible. Is the dominant discourse right? What if, in reality, this economic order were no more than the implementation of a utopia - the utopia of neoliberalism - thus converted into a political problem? One that, with the aid of the economic theory that it proclaims, succeeds in conceiving of itself as the scientific description of reality?This tutelary theory is a pure mathematical fiction. From the start it has been founded on a formidable abstraction. For, in the name of a narrow and strict conception of rationality as individual rationality, it brackets the economic and social conditions of rational orientations and the economic and social structures that are the condition of their application.To give the measure of this omission, it is enough to think just of the educational system. Education is never taken account of as such at a time when it plays a determining role in the production of goods and services as in the production...

Words: 1343 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Neoliberalism Essay

...Assessment 2: Major Essay What is neoliberalism and how is it connected to 'development'? Neoliberalism, quite simply, is defined by David Harvey as the: … theory of political economic practices that proposes that human well-being can be best advanced by liberating individual entrepreneurial freedoms and skills within an institutional framework characterised by strong private property rights, free markets and free trade... (2007, pg 2) Through this approach, economic and social barriers and constraints are sought to be eliminated to prompt the market towards becoming self-sufficient. Therefore, it is very easy for neoliberalism to hinder the development of economies and society, as imbalances in wealth and living conditions are emphasised and expanded over time. In particular, these imbalances become quite prominent in developing countries, for example, Brazil, where they may begin to take importance over the conditions of the population. Despite this, we are still observing the existence of neoliberalism in the 21st century on an international scale as the globalisation era lingers and development continues to evolve. In the modern world, neoliberalism offers ‘the supporting ideology of globalisation’ and depends on market forces, free trade and laissez-faire government roles to become efficient. (Heron, T. 2008. Pg. 1;Kelleher, A and Klein, L. 2011. Pg. 95) It was in the late eighteenth century when Adam Smith originally formulated the idea that in an economy, priority...

Words: 2413 - Pages: 10

Free Essay

Neoliberalism

...Ece Kıray SOC 578- Week 9 In the article of ‘From discipline to flexibilisation’, the transformation from fordist mode of regulation to postfordist disciplinary is explained. During this transformation the mode of social regulation in social, economic and political evolved until today by influence of globalisation. Fordism is a modern economic and social systems based on industrialized, standardized mass production and mass consumption. The concept is used in social, economic, and management theory about production, working conditions, consumption, and related phenomena, especially regarding the 20th century. Fordist accumulation mechanism did not influence only economic issues. It also regulated social, cultural, political issues in society through advertising, mass media and mass entertainment. Fordist mode of regulation comprised some disciplines to hold society together and proceed properly. It aimed to control individual from their family and community life to work place. Rational control expanded in almost all social areas such as household management, social work, psychotherapy, industrial psychology, etc. Furthermore, the social regulations were concentrated within a national frame. All social areas are controlled and bounded nationally. Thirdly, it was encouraged individuals to be more rational and autonomous for their own decisions through instutions such as family, school, psychology, workplace. In the post-89 era of postfordist globalisation, firstly, there...

Words: 656 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Neo-Liberalism

...There has been widespread praise and critique of neo-liberal policies and their effect on the international economy, particularly with respect to widening inequality, suppression of developing economies and contribution to financial crisis due to destabilizing capital flows. This paper will contrast the implied positive effects of neo-liberalism from a Keynesian perspective against a Marxist analysis which suggests such economic liberalism merely changes the time intervals and severity of inevitable boom and bust cycles of capitalism and as such makes no permanent progression in the global economy. Displacement of the Keynesian welfare state policy approach was embedded in end of the long boom. Rising worker militancy and diminishing productivity gave way to severe cost-push inflation, compounded by oil price spikes leading to criticism of aggregate demand management as policy makers sought a structural solution. Neo-liberal policies, with theoretical origins in individual utility maximization (Mill and Bentham) and Adam Smith’s Laissez-Faire optimality imply a reduced role of government in reliance on the free market to provide the most efficient outcome. Development of a neo-liberal state would then encompass privatization of Government owned enterprises, deregulation of financial markets and redistribution of income from the poor to the rich in attempt to boost private investment and job creation through the trickle-down effect. A Marxist view of neo-liberalism would hold...

Words: 754 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Cookie Business

...Economic Conditions When looking into Cambodia’s economic welfare we found out that “Despite recent progress, the Cambodian economy continues to suffer from the legacy of decades of war and internal strife and Cambodia remains one of the least developed countries.” Cambodia relies heavily on assistance from other countries especially Japan. Cambodia has gone through several civil wars which have hurt the country in many ways with their development. “Growth accelerated in the late 1980s with the government's gradual move towards free market economic policies. Growth was propelled further during 1991-1993 by the UN presence in Cambodia.” Cambodia has shown improvements since all the civil wars have ended and will continue to show improvements till the country reaches a better economic situation in the coming years. Cambodia is not a great place to want to start a company unless it had to do with the garment business or the agriculture business because that is the majority of the countries income. Cambodia is becoming a more stable country but it still has a way to go before it can be relied on by other countries. With the population being so young there that “…more than 50% of the population is less than 21 years old. The population lacks education and productive skills…” Which make it difficult for the country to succeed because of the lack of infrastructure. Once economic conditions improve in Cambodia then I can see more companies transitioning over there and creating more...

Words: 545 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Docx

...Name: Gunel Aliyeva Group: 2 Title: Home essay Instructor: Tural Mammadov Question: How are the differences between these two types of capitalism affecting the current phase of globalization? Answer: Neoliberalism – “Liberalism" can refer to political, economic, or even religious ideas. "Neo" means that a new kind of liberalism. Neoliberalism is a set of economic policies which there is the role of state is minimal emphasis on individualism, it means that in the neoliberal countries the government don’t interference to the market of economy. But the government helps to the removal of all barriers to commerce, and the privatization of all available resources and services. On the other way these are the goal of neoliberal economic globalization. That’s why this capitalism affects globalization process effectively. Statism- another type of capitalism which is the concentration of economic controls and planning by a highly centralized government that often extends to government ownership of industry. It means that the government to regulate markets, control profits, direct economic investment. In contrast to neoliberalism, statist capitalism don’t allow development of globalization. This is very differences between neoliberalism and statism. Question: What are the implications of the stronger presence of statist capitalism for international trade, international business and economic development? Answer: According to the comparability, international trade is more restricted...

Words: 682 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Social and Political Theory

...Why Us Attracts Immigration From All Over the World Ever since the discovery of America many centuries ago, the country has continued to attract millions of immigrants from all over the world. Some of the common reasons that have led to increased numbers of immigrants into the country are things such as plentiful job opportunities, cases of overpopulations in other countries, search for religious and political asylum, and the advertisement for free land. However, some of the main reasons behind the immigrations include, but are not limited to, education, economic, social security, and cultural aspects. Using the above four reasons as the main points, this paper helps to explain why USA has remained a major attraction for immigrants from allover the world. As a matter of fact, USA offers a lot in terms of education compared to what other countries in the world are able to provide for their citizens (Rumbaut, 1994). The country is home to some of the best universities and colleges in the world, and for that reason, has continued to attract students from all parts of the world. Some of the famous institutions of higher education in the country will include universities such as California Institute of Technology, Harvard University, University of California, New York University, University of Michigan, Yale University, and the University of Chicago. Most of these institutions have constantly featured in the World University Rankings, thus amassing too much recognition...

Words: 964 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

State Capitalism vs Liberal Capitalism

...Overview Capitalism is the combination of many actions that provides the economic structure such as the changing balance of output, trade, income and employment. This is based on private ownership by means of corporations or individuals. There are many types of capitalism. This essay discusses two types of capitalism that are currently being debated in the media, State capitalism and liberal capitalism. This essay also investigates whether the South Africa is really state capitalism or are they using Major Private Sectors to socially develop the South African economy, being Neoliberal capitalism? State Capitalism VS Liberal Capitalism State capitalism is when the government takes control over the commercial economic environment. The government may own shares in a public company listed in the stock exchange, acting as a large shareholder. Another type of economic system where State capitalism would be involved is when production is owned by private companies and the state controls the credit and investment allocation. Liberal capitalism is also known as free market capitalism; it gives companies and individuals the freedom to run their own market and set their own price systems. Individuals or companies would benefit with their gains and face detriment with their errors. The government may intervene to control free trade and open competition by eliminating private Monopoly. Neoliberal Capitalism is where private sectors seek to maximise the political and economic priorities...

Words: 1465 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Globalization and Neoliberalism

...Globalization and Neoliberalism The process by which businesses or other organizations develop international influence or start operating on an international scale. Process by which the experience of everyday life, marked by the diffusion of commodities and ideas, is becoming standardized around the world. Factors that have contributed to globalization include increasingly sophisticated communications and transportation technologies and services, mass migration and the movement of peoples, a level of economic activity that has outgrown national markets through industrial combinations and commercial groupings that cross national frontiers, and international agreements that reduce the cost of doing business in foreign countries. Globalization offers huge potential profits to companies and nations but has been complicated by widely differing expectations, standards of living, cultures and values, and legal systems as well as unexpected global cause-and-effect linkages. Globalization is not an inevitable process and there are risks and costs: -Inequality: Globalization has been linked to rising inequalities in income and wealth. Evidence for this is a rise in the Gini-coefficient and a growing rural–urban divide in countries such as China, India and Brazil. -Inflation: Strong demand for food and energy has caused a steep rise in commodity prices. Food price inflation (known as afflation) has placed millions of the world’s poorest people at great risk. -Macroeconomic instability:...

Words: 684 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Current Event Focus

...Current Event Focus 1 For my current event focus I decided to examine the article named: Free Trade and Globalization by Anup Shah because it talks in great detail about how the world is becoming more globalized, there is no doubt about that. While that sounds promising, this article describes how the current form of globalization, neoliberalism, free trade and open markets are coming under much criticism (Shah, 2011). The interests of powerful nations and corporations are shaping the terms of world trade. In democratic countries, they are shaping and affecting the ability of elected leaders to make decisions in the interests of their people (Shah, 2011). In addition the author describes that elsewhere they are promoting narrow political discourse and even supporting dictatorships and the “stability” that it brings for their interests. This is to the detriment of most people in the world, while increasingly fewer people in proportion are prospering (Shah, 2011). In consequence, the author makes the reader aware of how the western mainstream media, hardly provides much debate, gladly allowing this economic liberalism (a largely, but not only, politically conservative stance) to be confused with the term political liberalism (to do with progressive and liberal social political issues) (Shah, 2011). Margaret Thatcher's slogan of “there is no alternative” rings sharply. Finally, I loved this article because it left me with a great question in mind; perhaps there is no alternative...

Words: 499 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

What Are the Main Challenges to Liberalism in the Current Global Order ?

...What are the Main Challenges to Liberalism in the Current Global Order? Introduction: Liberalism: dominant ideological force shaping western political thought. Identified with western civilisation itself. Lib v. Popular inter-war period by idealists who believed warfare was an outdated way of settling events. Heywood- the central theme of liberalism in all its forms is harmony Peace is normal Faith in HN Democracy is necessary Outline what Neo-Liberalism believes in1) peace and security2) Economy – capitalism, no government intervention, invisible hand, free trade, absolute advantages, relative advantages. David ricardo. 3) Democracy Democracy and the USA ( link USA with liberalism) Ability of USA to steer world order is diminishing All about state capitalism: Rising powers are wanting a greater share of the spoils → challenging liberalism and thus USA → russia and china veto UN involvement in Syria Newly powerful states are starting to advance their own agendas for the world order: weaker US will find it harder to defend liberalism Todays rising states are large non-western developing countries. Brazil/China/India HOWEVER: Most people believe India/Brazil likely to support liberalism e.g. India has a commitment to interdependence. India is a joiner – it wants to be included e.g.recently pushed for a permanent seat on the UN security council Economy The recession has bolstered this narrative. The economic crisis started US- tarnished American model...

Words: 416 - Pages: 2