Premium Essay

Nukes

In:

Submitted By swami20
Words 592
Pages 3
The U. S. A. and the Soviet Union are vying with each other in testing and producing nuclear weapons. China too has recently entered the race. These facts, together with the mounting rivalry and tension between the two Power Blocs, give rise to the fear that the world is perilously on the brink of a nuclear war. The horrors of a nuclear war are unimaginable. We may have some idea of them by recalling the havoc caused by the dropping of the atom bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki towards the end of the Second World War. Not only were the two cities wiped out of existence but the atmosphere for miles around was polluted and people there fell victims to strange diseases. The destruction of entire cities and sudden deaths of millions of civilians caused by nuclear weapons are shocking enough. But what is more shocking, though it is not adequately realised by laymen, is the disastrous effect of the use of such weapons on the survivors and their unborn children. The radioactive fallout spreads for miles around and causes untold harm to millions of innocent people. The radiation produced by the splitting of the atom causes mysterious diseases and leads to the birth of defective children. In fact, the fall-out from the nuclear tests and explosions in Siberia and the Pacific has already caused a lot of harm, though the Great Powers carrying out these experiments may not admit it. It is known, for example, that nuclear test made some years ago on the distant Marshall Islands affected the health of several Japanese fishermen. The harm caused by wars in the past was limited. But modern warfare spells disaster to millions of innocent civilians and to the victors themselves who cannot escape from its harmful effects. As Bertrand Russell has said, "Unless mankind abolishes war, war will abolish mankind". Some people argue that any one of the Big Powers will be reluctant to

Similar Documents

Free Essay

To Nuke or Not Nuke

...Background People of the modern world are divided against the existence of nuclear warheads. Therefore, the game that will be analyzed is the nuclear summit scene from G.I. Joe: Retaliation by John M. Chu. In order to understand this scene it is necessary to know that Zartan, a soldier of the Cobra clan, disguised himself as the President of the United States. The scene consists of leaders of Israel, United Kingdom, France, India, North Korea, Russia, and Zartan. The scene begins by talking about reduction of nuclear warheads by 50% by 2016, however, Zartan wishes to have total disarmament as of right now. When the other leaders revolt by saying that the world is safer with nuclear weapons Zartan presses the button to deploy all the nuclear warheads that the United States have, hence stage 1 of the game begins. Once the warheads are in air the leaders of the other countries become flustered and one by one start to deploy their own nuclear war heads towards each other. Once all players deployed the nuclear missiles, Zartan asks if anyone is willing to abort the madness of bombing every country in the world. When no one decides to be the first to abort it’s own nuclear war heads, Zartan self-destructs all of the United States’ nuclear missiles in order to pursue his original goal of a total nuclear free world, hence stage 2 starts. Once Zartan destroyed all the missiles in mid-air, he begins to tell the other leaders to abort and self-destruct their...

Words: 2247 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Nuke

...The States concluding this Treaty, hereinafter referred to as the "Parties to the Treaty", Considering the devastation that would be visited upon all mankind by a nuclear war and the consequent need to make every effort to avert the danger of such a war and to take measures to safeguard the security of peoples, Believing that the proliferation of nuclear weapons would seriously enhance the danger of nuclear war, In conformity with resolutions of the United Nations General Assembly calling for the conclusion of an agreement on the prevention of wider dissemination of nuclear weapons, Undertaking to cooperate in facilitating the application of International Atomic Energy Agency safeguards on peaceful nuclear activities, Expressing their support for research, development and other efforts to further the application, within the framework of the International Atomic Energy Agency safeguards system, of the principle of safeguarding effectively the flow of source and special fissionable materials by use of instruments and other techniques at certain strategic points, Affirming the principle that the benefits of peaceful applications of nuclear technology, including any technological by-products which may be derived by nuclear-weapon States from the development of nuclear explosive devices, should be available for peaceful purposes to all Parties of the Treaty, whether nuclear-weapon or non-nuclear weapon States, Convinced that, in furtherance of this principle, all Parties to...

Words: 2255 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Nuke Enrgy

...Introduction 1. [pp: 2Albert]Albert Einstein once said: “The release of atomic energy has not created a new problem. It has merely made more urgent the necessity of solving an existing one.” 2. Nuclear power is a source of energy that occurs when a neutron is launched at an unstable atom like uranium or plutonium. A cool fact about nuclear power is that it is a scientific discovery that was funded by the military. The US called it the Manhattan project. The project existed during WWII to create a bomb that would scare the world into peace Nuclear power is used in many ways to create power and to this there are many advantages and disadvantages, there are even some accidents but in the end there are more pros than there are cons. We talk about clean energy and most of you think of water or wind power, but there are some big drawbacks to these that nobody seems to ever discuss. Body I. What it’s used for [pp: 2Einstein]Nuclear energy is used to make power for many things. Many countries such as France and Japan have already changed most of their power to nuclear power and minimized the amount of fossil fuel used to create power. Many of the major navies in the world use this as a way to dominate the seas. The main reason that we don’t want to use fossil fuel is that it creates green house gases that may or may not be causing global warming but they do cause pollution in their immediate area with sulfur and other toxic chemicals...

Words: 1824 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

The Impact of Nukes on War

...is what “deters” powerful nations from going to war. If one observes the events during the cold war, it is clear that the United States and Soviet Union were at odds, and during a different time, would probably have fought. In the case of the cold war, neither side could justify the outcome of all-out war despite their clear and apparent problems. This is influenced by what is known as second strike capability. Many of the powerful nations that have waged war against each other in the past have nuclear arsenals. If country A launched nukes at country B, country B would fire back. As a result, more conflicts have been resolved through diplomacy and non-violence. States also risk putting civilians in direct danger, as destruction of the state and population is assured, even if the conflict is overseas. By observing events like the Cold War, it’s clear that international politics has changed. Second strike capabilities and the ramifications of nukes are far too great of a risk to justify all out wars between major powers. This mutually assured destruction encourages parties to find alternatives to...

Words: 313 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Know Nukes Now

...Running head: ELEPHANTS Elephants Student’s name SPC 1608 Brigette Robinson Pensacola State College Introduction: I. According to worldelephantday.org, status an estimated 100 African Elephants are killed each day by poachers seeking ivory, meat and body parts. II. My name is __________, and I would like to talk to you today about different types of elephants. III. There are two different types of elephants, African and Asian. They both have similarities and differences. IV. Today I will inform you about elephants and why they are endangered, which species is at more risk than the other, and the language used by this incredible species. Body: I. The years 2011 and 2012 indicate the worst record for elephant poaching in Africa; Tens of thousands of elephants were slaughtered (“National Geographic”, n.d.). a. In 2011 the highest number of illegal ivory seizures in the last 23 years was recorded. i. Ivory is the number one reason that elephants are killed. ii. Their meat and body parts are among the other top reasons elephants are hunted. b. Poaching is an illegal act. Now that we know about elephant poaching, let’s take a look at an endangered species of elephants. II. The most endangered of the species is the Asian elephant. c. Asian elephant’s habitat ranges over 14 countries across Asia. iii. Wild Asian elephants suffer severe habitat loss in some of the most densely human populate...

Words: 445 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Ebby Calvin 'N': A Short Story

...Picture yourself one step away from your dream, whatever your dream may be. You’ve got the talent, the desire, and the mindset to take you to the top. Yet, you’re missing two key components: control and experience. This is the situation Ebby Calvin “Nuke” Laloosh (played by Tim Robbins) is in. He’s a star pitcher that’s rapidly making his way through the minor leagues and finds himself pitching for the Durham Bulls, one team away from pitching for the New York Yankees. He’s a young pitcher with a thunderbolt for an arm, but when the ball leaves his hand, he’s got no idea where it’s going to go! In his first game he hit the public address announcer, the sportswriter, the bull mascot twice, but struck out eighteen batters! The manager decides...

Words: 1220 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

John F Kennedy Thirteen Days Analysis

...focusing on the construction of their own nukes. The rising tensions between the U.S. in the Soviet Union increased even more with the introduction of nukes in a period called the Cold War, where the U.S. and Soviet Union did not actively engage in war but used their political and military influence to fight for communism and democracy. The U.S. implemented its own nukes in the countries of Italy and Turkey which was meant for quick and swift nuclear action if necessary. The U.S.S.R began to feel threatened and decided to implement their own nukes in Cuba as Cuba was a communist state after the failure of the United States in the bay of pigs to prevent communist. The current leaders of the U.S. and the Soviet Union were John F. Kennedy, and Khrushchev who rarely had any diplomatic agreements. J.F.K.’s response to the Cuban Missile Crisis was to set up a blockade to prevent any resources from coming to Cuba. The Soviet Union contemplated weather to start begin a war as a response to the U.S. and it’s blockade leading to the thirteen days of the Cuban Missile Crisis. One submarine sent by the Soviet Union while underwater believed that war had begin and had 3 officers decide weather to launch a nuke on the U.S. which 2 officers agreed to launch but 1 did not. The Cuban Missile Crisis eventually ends when the U.S. makes a diplomatic agreement with the Soviet Union to remove its nuclear weapons in Europe as long as the Soviet Union would remove its nukes from Cuba. The 13 days of the Cuban...

Words: 861 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

If Poison Gas Can Go

...If Poison Gas Can Go, Why Not Nukes? Summary James Carroll’s “If Poison Gas Can Go, Why Not Nukes?” is a rally for readers to support the elimination of nuclear weapons from acceptable military arsenal just like poison gas was banned. The author believes that just like chemical weapons were developed, used successfully in war and eventually abandoned so will nuclear weapons. Carroll believes that nuclear weapons are dangerous and can be used for enormous destruction. The author builds his arguments from a historical perspective. At the beginning of the 20th century when scientists were experimenting with new weapon technology, “poisonous weapons” were developed (Carroll 1). The world reacted by outlawing these weapons through the Hague Convention in 1907. However, this did not stop countries from developing and using chemical weapons in war. Germany and Britain used asphyxiating gas in World War I. While there were less than 100,000 casualties fewer than the millions cause by conventional military weapons, the chemical weapons still cause great concern in Europe. The author identifies a group of people he terms as “realists”. They represent strong opposition against the banning of effective military weapons. The realists were opposed to the abolition of the use of military weapons in the 1900s and are also against the abandonment of nuclear armament. The realists’ main argument is that nowhere in history have effective weapons been abandoned because the ultimate...

Words: 1223 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

The Arms Race

...The Arms Race Arsenal A-Bomb (US 1945, USSR 1949) H-Bomb (US 1952, USSR 1953) ICBM (US 1957, USSR 1958) 1957 : USSR launch first satellite “Sputnik”into space. “Missile Gap” paranoia in USA ABM (Anti-Ballistic Missiles intercept & destroy nukes in theory)(USSR 1968, USA 1972) MIRV (USA 1970, USSR 1975) -Stockpiling of nuclear weapons seen as necessary by both parties -Technological advances made both USA & USSR feel vulnerable -Secrecy, need to catch up or to be one step ahead = fuelled arms race -This (building increasingly powerful & sophisticated weapons) continued until 1980s Key Ideas : Nuclear weapons have crucial impact on US foreign policy during Cold War : -gave rise to arms race (essential feature of CW, maintains CW hostility) -revolutionized military strategy -imposed great economic strain (hence end of CW? Debatable) Brodie (1946) “The Absolute Weapon” Main idea : before nukes the purpose of military = win wars after nukes the purpose of military = avoid wars Military victory in total war impossible for either side US Presidents develop different strategies on what to do with their nuclear arsenal Eisenhower & “Massive Retaliation” = the US will use every weapon if attacked, despite the consequences = the threat of an all-out nuclear war used to make sure it wouldn’t happen ? Kennedy & “Flexible Response” =exploring wider options beyond military forces Sec of State McNamara’s belief in possibility of limited, controlled and rational (...

Words: 654 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

People

...and other countries are in the game. In the U.S., the CIA, National Security Agency and Pentagon are all funding research, while Los Alamos National Laboratory operates one of the most significant quantum computer labs. Negotiations to keep nuclear weapons from Iran are certainly critical, but if you play out the promise of quantum computing, an American machine could bust into Iranian systems and shut down all that country’s nuclear activity in an instant. It’s like a game of rock-paper-scissors: Nukes might be the world’s version of a rock, but quantum computers would be paper, winning every time. And yet, quantum computing research isn’t self-contained and secretive in the manner of the Los Alamos atomic bomb work during World War II. Some of it is academic work at universities such as the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, with findings shared in scientific papers. Technology companies are working on this, too, since these things have the potential to be business nukes. IBM, Google and Microsoft all fund research. Imagine if Google gets one before Microsoft. That pesky Bing could wind up vaporized. Google has a Quantum Artificial Intelligence unit working with the University of California, Santa Barbara, with a goal of developing a quantum machine that can learn. Meanwhile, a Canadian startup, D-Wave Systems, is partially funded by Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos—and the CIA. The very secretive and often controversial...

Words: 801 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Hello

...Lions, Elephants and Alligators into Animal Kings: Grantlinkspence Win the Game: HOME RUN Lose the Game: HARI KARI Resign: RESIGN 1000 Food Bonus: PEPPERONI PIZZA 1000 Gold Bonus: COINAGE 1000 Stone Bonus: QUARRY 1000 Wood Bonus: WOODSTOCK Accelerates your Chariot Archers: UPSIDFLINTMOBILE All Enemy Units Die: DIEDIEDIE Kill Player X: KILLX Priests are Faster and Stronger: HOYOHOYO Removes the Fog of War: NO FOG Reveals the Map: REVEAL MAP Buildings and Units are Created Instantly: STEROIDS Black Sports Car with a Rocket Launcher: BIGDADDY Create a Man in a White Suit with a Quick-firing Laser Gun: PHOTON MAN Creates a Man in a White Suit with a slow-firing Nuke Gun: E=MC2 TROOPER Gives you Control over Nature (but lose control over your own civilization): GAIA St. Francis Unit that resembles Priest but can summon lightning when close enough to opponent: CONVERT THIS! Summons a Baby on a Tricycle with a Musket: POW Turns Heavy Catapults into Big Berthas: BIG BERTHA Turns Horse Archers into Black Riders: BLACK RIDER White Sports Car with a Roket Launcer: BIG MOMMA Your Ballistas and Helepolis have a 99+1 Range: ICBM Your Catapults and Stone Throwers Fire Villagers, Cows, etc: JACK BE NIMBLE Upgrade your Catapult Tiremes/Juggernauts into Flying Dutchmen: FLYING...

Words: 571 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

2012 Vice President Debate

...I belive, the Vice President Debate on Oct. 11, 2012, which was the Obama Admin. V.S. Romney Admin. Biden is almost always laughing over everything Ryan is saying, the war in iraq, which was the possiblity of nukes in iraq. the bringing of our troops back too america and all around the other country. the allowment the iraq military too handle there country against the taliban. the economy here in america, and the bills/taxes that are trying too get passed. the possiblity of a nuke war. biden laughing mostly thru the disscussion, ryan explaining.....that iraq is 4 years closer too making a nuclear bomb, biden saying that its not true, there only getting nuclear power for a “possible” nuke. i can see how iraq can get the material, maybe in this world, there’s something called a black market, which sells alot of stuff, its the opposing power who will do anything too gain power. another possability would be the kindness romney shows, that ryan explained of a family romney visited. it shows a kind-hearted side of romney. biden didnt say anything about obama. he does demand questions tho, biden. which is reasonable but i belive the republican party may have a better idea of what too do for the future of america, not its downfall. there’s another disscussion, the burning of the koran. that should america apologize for burning on kurans, and pissing on taliban bodie’s? of course, that is messed up like by far. but we should only apologize what we americans belive in...

Words: 846 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

The One

...“Field of Bull” Realism is all about showing the truth. A realist will try to defend the assumptions that their film ideas are not influenced, but are a true mirror of the actual world. We rarely notice the style in a realistic movie; they often aim for a gritty look, with the idea that if it’s too pretty, it’s false. Their films are about everyday people and everyday situations. At the opposite side of realism, we have Formalism. Formalist directors have no desire to show reality. They want to show their personal vision of the world and how they want their audience to view it. They are concerned with mythical and spiritual truths that can best be represented by distorting the image of reality. Classicism to bring in a third theory is all about ideal storytelling, it lies somewhere in between realism and formalism. (Understanding Movies 5) The goal of a classicist is to tell a story in the best way possible. They want you to get caught up in the characters and their problems, to feel what they feel, but not be distracted by the filmmaking techniques. The two films we screened in class Bull Durham directed by Ron Shelton, and Field of Dreams based on the novel Shoeless Joe directed by Phil Alden Robinson both demonstrate these film theories throughout their movies but in a very different matter. Bull Durham is a great realistic example of what the sport of baseball means to the men who play it. It's all about the dreams, the desire to compete, and the ultimate goal to one day...

Words: 1632 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Field of Bull

...“Field of Bull” Realism is all about showing the truth. A realist will try to defend the assumptions that their film ideas are not influenced, but are a true mirror of the actual world. We rarely notice the style in a realistic movie; they often aim for a gritty look, with the idea that if it’s too pretty, it’s false. Their films are about everyday people and everyday situations. At the opposite side of realism, we have Formalism. Formalist directors have no desire to show reality. They want to show their personal vision of the world and how they want their audience to view it. They are concerned with mythical and spiritual truths that can best be represented by distorting the image of reality. Classicism to bring in a third theory is all about ideal storytelling, it lies somewhere in between realism and formalism. (Understanding Movies 5) The goal of a classicist is to tell a story in the best way possible. They want you to get caught up in the characters and their problems, to feel what they feel, but not be distracted by the filmmaking techniques. The two films we screened in class Bull Durham directed by Ron Shelton, and Field of Dreams based on the novel Shoeless Joe directed by Phil Alden Robinson both demonstrate these film theories throughout their movies but in a very different matter. Bull Durham is a great realistic example of what the sport of baseball means to the men who play it. It's all about the dreams, the desire to compete, and the ultimate goal to one day...

Words: 1632 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Atomic Bomb: Was It The Right Thing To Do?

...people were and still to this day are asking is, “Was it the right thing to do?’ Yes it was the best thing to do in that certain situation. The atomic bombs explosion is massive.“A nuclear weapon’s explosive power is measured in yield, which is expressed in tons of TNT. Fission, or atomic bombs, can be as small as one kiloton (KT) of explosive power or as large as several hundred kilotons.”(PBS Newshour) This is important because it's showing the measures of the power of an atomic bomb. Since the end of the Cold War, both Pakistan and India have developed nuclear devices. North Korea tested a nuclear device in 2006, and Iran is suspected of having a nuclear development program. countries are developing atomic weapons.(Forster, Matt. "Nukes for Peace." Nukes for Peace: n. pag. P) Countries are developing these massive weapons and that means that if it all comes down to it then the bombs will be used in matter of war. However, over time atomic weapons, which basically followed the Nagasaki Fat Man design, began to get smaller and lighter with greater yield, becoming more efficient. Compact atomic bombs directed to hit a city directly could still cause casualties in the hundreds of thousands, if not millions. Atom bombs over time have gotten smaller but more effective and can still kill hundreds of thousands and even millions.("Types of Nuclear Bombs." PBS Newshour. N.p., n.d. Web. 22)The bombs are getting smaller but not less deadly. The U.S. is the only country to have used an atomic...

Words: 1520 - Pages: 7