Free Essay

Partnership Agreement

In:

Submitted By Givers
Words 2912
Pages 12
Co-development/ Partnership Agreement

This Co-development Agreement (hereinafter called the “Agreement”) is entered into by and between

[name]
[company registration number]
[address]

(hereinafter called “Party A”)

and

[name]
[company registration number]
[address]

(hereinafter called “Party B”)

1. Definitions

1.1 As used in the Agreement, the following words have the following meanings when written with a capital first letter:

The “Agreement” means this Co-development Agreement, including Appendix A, as may be amended from time to time in accordance with Clause 11.1.

“Background Rights” means all Confidential Information and IPR owned by a Party and which are not Foreground Rights.

“Confidential Information” means all technical and other information which is not IPR.

“Field of Use” means [field of use] in respect of Party A and [field of use] in respect of Party B. “Foreground Rights” means all Confidential Information and IPR which are first generated in the perfor-mance of the Project.

“IPR” means patents, utility models, designs, copyrights and any other intellectual property rights of a technical nature anywhere in the world.

“Party” or “Parties” means Party A or Party B, individually, or Party A and Party B, collectively.

“Product” means [product to be developed under the Project].

“Project” means the project to develop the Product, as set out in Appendix A hereto.

2. Scope

2.1 Party A and Party B hereby agree to jointly perform the Project, on and subject to the terms and condi-tions of the Agreement.

2.2 Due to the experimental nature of the Project, a Party’s failure to achieve a particular result shall not be considered a breach of the Agreement.

3. Costs

3.1 The costs of performing the Project shall be borne by the Parties as set out in Appendix A.

3.2 Except as provided in Appendix A or as otherwise agreed by the Parties in writing, a Party shall not be required to bear any costs associated with performing the Project.

4. Ownership

4.1 Each Party shall exclusively own its Background Rights.

4.2 The Parties shall jointly own all Foreground Rights, whether made solely by a Party or jointly by the Par-ties.

4.3 A Party shall not pledge, sell or otherwise dispose of its interest in the Foreground Rights to third parties without the other Party’s prior written consent.

4.4 Licensing of Foreground Rights to third parties shall require written agreement between the Parties, set-ting out their respective rights and obligations, including, without limitation, the distribution of licensing costs and income.

5. Right of use

5.1 A Party shall be entitled to exclusively use the Foreground Rights to make, sell or otherwise dispose of the Product within its Field of Use.

5.2 Each Party hereby grants to the other Party the non-exclusive right to use its Background Rights free of charge, but only as strictly necessary to perform the Project.

5.3 Each Party hereby grants to the other Party a non-exclusive, royalty-bearing, non-transferable right to use its Background Rights, but only as strictly necessary to enable the other Party to make, sell or oth-erwise dispose of the Product within its Field of Use. The terms and conditions of the right of use shall be set out in a separate agreement negotiated and signed by the Parties in good faith. 5.4 No right to use any Background Rights is granted by one Party to the other under the Agreement except as expressly set out in Clauses 5.2 and 5.3.

6. Protection

6.1 The Parties shall decide, by mutual agreement, whether to file for or maintain patent or other IPR protec-tion of the Foreground Rights.

6.2 If the Parties decide to file for or maintain patent or other IPR protection of a Foreground Right, the Par-ties shall agree which Party shall conduct the activities in the names of and on behalf of both Parties. The Parties shall equally bear all costs resulting from these activities.

6.3 If a Party declines to bear its share of the costs associated with filing for or maintaining patent or other IPR protection of a Foreground Right, the other Party may conduct the activities in its own name and at its own expense. The declining Party shall retain its rights set out in Clause 5.1 in respect of the patent or other IPR protection, but shall lose its rights and obligations under Clause 4.4 in respect of the patent or other IPR protection.

7. Enforcement

7.1 The Parties shall decide, by mutual agreement, whether to take action against an infringement of the Foreground Rights by a third party.

7.2 If the Parties decide to take action against an infringement of a Foreground Right by a third party, the Parties shall decide which Party shall control the activities in the names of and on behalf of the Parties. The Parties shall equally bear all costs and income associated with such action.

7.3 If a Party declines to bear its share of the costs associated with the action taken against an infringement of a Foreground Right by a third party, the other Party may decide to take such action in its own name, controlling the action and bearing all costs associated with and obtaining all income resulting from the action.

8. Confidentiality

8.1 Each Party shall keep all Background Rights of the other Party and all Foreground Rights strictly confi-dential and shall not disclose these to any third party without the other Party’s prior written consent.

8.2 The obligations set out in Clause 8.1 shall not apply to any Background Rights and Foreground Rights that are generally available to the public, obtained in good faith from a third party, independently developed by a Party or required to be disclosed by law.

9. Limitation of liability

9.1 A Party shall not be liable for any failure to fulfil any term or condition of the Agreement due to an event outside its reasonable control (force majeure). If such event continues for [number] days or more, the non-affected Party may terminate the Agreement by written notice and without liability to the affected Party.

9.2 In no event shall a Party be liable to the other Party for consequential, incidental, special, punitive or exemplary loss, including, but not limited to, loss of profit, loss of revenue, loss of business, loss of goodwill, loss of anticipated savings or cost of procuring substitute goods or services.

9.3 All Background Rights and Foreground Rights are provided “as is”, and neither Party makes any repre-sentation or warranty, including, without limitation, any representation or warranty of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, non-infringement, validity or patentability.

10. Term

10.1 The Agreement shall commence when signed by both Parties.

10.2 Either Party may terminate the Agreement subject to [number] days’ written notice to the other Party, if it holds a good-faith belief that the Product is not technically or commercially viable.

10.3 Either Party may terminate the Agreement by written notice to the other Party, effective immediately, if the other Party fails to remedy any material breach of the Agreement within [number] days of receiving written notice of such breach or if the other Party enters into insolvency proceedings.

11. Miscellaneous

11.1 The Agreement contains the entire understanding of the Parties with respect to the Project. The Agree-ment may not be amended except by written agreement signed by both Parties.

11.2 Any disputes arising out of or in connection with the Agreement which cannot be settled amicably shall be resolved by a court of competent jurisdiction in accordance with the laws of [country] excluding conflict of law principles.

11.3 The provisions of Clauses 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 4.4, 5.1, 5.3, 5.4, 6.1, 6.2, 6.3, 7.1, 7.2, 7.3, 8.1, 8.2, 9.2, 9.3, 11.2 and 11.3 hereof shall survive termination of the Agreement for any reason.

For and on behalf of For and on behalf of
Party A Party B

Name: Name:
Title: Title:
Date: Date:

Appendix A
Project

1. Key persons

The Parties’ key persons responsible for [area] are:

[names and contact details]

2. Product

The Product/Service to be developed under the Project is:

[description of Product]

3. Tasks

The tasks to be performed by Party A under the Project are:

[list and description of tasks to be performed by Party A]

The tasks to be performed by Party B under the Project are:

[list and description of tasks to be performed by Party B]

4. Costs

The estimated costs of performing the Project are detailed in the attached budget. The budget also de-tails how the costs are to be divided between and borne by the Parties.

5. Time schedule

The time schedule for performing the Project is:

[time schedule for performing the Project, including the Project as a whole and the tasks to be performed by either Party]

6. Other terms

[other terms applicable to the performance of the Project] Co-development/ Partnership Agreement guide

0. Parties

Your business partner's name, business registration number and address must be correct. Businesses in the same group often have similar names, for example, but whether you conclude the agreement with one or the other company is not necessarily irrelevant.

1. Definitions

Project: It is important the the project on which you and your business partner are to collaborate is clearly described in appendix A to the agreement. This way, you ensure that you clarify your expectations as regards the aim and realisation of the project. Appendix A may, for example, describe:
1.the product to be developed
2.the tasks which each of you is to perform,
3.materials, equipment, money etc. which each of you is to contribute,
4.time schedule for the project
5.names of project employees.

2. Scope of agreement

Clause 2.2: A project will often be experimental, and the specific results of a project will therefore also often be uncertain. This clause is to ensure that you and your business partner cannot set up claims against one another if you do not achieve particular results.

3. Costs

Clause 3.1: The agreement must set out how the costs associated with realising the project are to be distributed between you and your business partner, for instance in the form of a budget incorporated in appendix A.

Clause 3.2: This clause is to ensure that neither you nor your business partner may demand that the other party contributes to the project over and above what is set out in the agreement, unless you agree otherwise with each other.

4. Ownership

Clause 4.1: When you and your business partner decide to undertake a joint project, it will often be because each of you possesses relevant knowledge which you can contribute to the collaboration. This clause is intended to ensure that you each maintain the ownership of the knowledge which you have in advance ('Background Rights') irrespective of you entering into the project.

Clause 4.2: It is important that the agreement sets out who owns the knowledge ('Foreground Rights') which arises in connection with you and your business partner realising the project. The agreement assumes that all Foreground Rights are owned jointly by you and your business partner irrespective of which of you created these rights.

Clause 4.3: It is important that the agreement sets out whether you and your business partner are permitted, for example, to sell your own half of the Foreground Rights to third parties. The agreement assumes that you are not permitted to do so unless you agree on this.

Clause 4.4: It is important that the agreement sets out whether you and your business partner are permitted to sell licences to Foreground Rights to third parties. The agreement assumes that you are not permitted to do so unless you agree on this.

5. Right of use

Clause 5.1: The agreement assumes that you and your business partner work within different business areas and that each of you has an exclusive right to sell the product within your own business area.

Clause 5.2: In order for you and your business partner to realise the project, it is important that you have the right to use the Background Rights which each of you has in advance. Clause 5.2 of the agreement opens up for that.

Clause 5.3: It is important that you and your business partner have the right to use the Background Rights which each of you has in advance when you, at some point, are going to sell the product resulting from the project within your respective business areas – if the products use Background Rights. Clause 5.3 of the agreement opens up for that.

The agreement also assumes that you agree further on the terms of use in a separate agreement.

6. Protection

Clause 6.1: The agreement should set out the terms applying to the filing of patent applications etc. in respect of Foreground Rights. The agreement assumes that this is a matter which you and your business partner will decide on jointly.

Clause 6.2: The agreement assumes that you and your business partner jointly file patent applications etc. in respect of Foreground Rights and that you have joint ownership of the patents etc. resulting from such applica-tions. The agreement also assumes that you and your business partner share all costs associated with patenting etc.

Clause 6.3: If you or your business partner refuses to bear your share of the costs associated with patenting etc. in respect of a Foreground Right, the agreement permits the other party to do so in his own name and at his own expense. The refusing party maintains his right to use the Foreground Right, but loses his rights in respect of any patents etc. resulting from the patenting.

7. Enforcement

Clause 7.1: It is important that the agreement sets out what should happen if a third party uses a Foreground Right without you or your business partner having permitted such use. The agreement assumes that this is a matter which you and your business partner will decide on jointly.

Clause 7.2: The agreement assumes that you and your business will jointly pursue the infringement case. The clause also assumes that you will share all costs and any income resulting from the case.

Clause 7.3: If you or your business partner do not want to bear your share of the costs of an infringement case, the agreement permits that the other party does so in his own name and that that party bears all costs and obtains all income resulting from the case.

8. Confidentiality

Clauses 8.1 and 8.2: It is important that you do not disclose more Background Rights to your business partner than strictly necessary, irrespective of the fact that the agreement contains provisions which are designed to limit the risk of your business partner disclosing your Background Rights to a third party or abusing your Back-ground Rights..

As soon as you disclose information, you lose control of what happens further with such information. It is also important that you mark all background information which you hand over to your business partner in physical form as 'CONFIDENTIAL' or in a similar fashion.

9. Limitation of liability

Clause 9.1: According to the agreement, you and your business partner are not liable for any non-fulfilment of the agreement if this is due to circumstances outside your control. This is what is called 'force majeure'. Exam-ples of force majeure are, for example, war, flooding and fire.

Clause 9.2: The agreement sets out that, if you or your business partner commits a breach of your obligations under the agreement, you may not claim compensation from the other party for any 'indirect loss' (consequen-tial, incidental, special, punitive or exemplary loss).

Clause 9.3: The agreement ensures that you and your business partner may not set up claims against one an-other if, for example, it turns out that some of the Background Rights and Foreground Rights you have made available to each other should infringe any third-party rights. In other words, you are each liable for your own use of Background Rights and Foreground Rights.

10. Term

Clause 10.2: If you want to ensure that you can withdraw from the agreement whenever you need to, you must write this into the agreement. It may, for example, be a good idea to write into the agreement that either party may terminate the agreement at any time subject to a specific notice period if there is reason to believe that the product is not technically or commercially viable.

Clause 10.3: If a party fails to meet his obligations in accordance with the agreement, it is a good idea if the agreement offers the other party the option of terminating the agreement at very short notice; for example if your business partner repeatedly refuses to pay his share of the costs of completing the project.
11. Miscellaneous
Clause 11.2: It must appear from the agreement which country's law is to apply in the event that a dispute arises If both you and your business partner are unable to settle amicably

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Trans Pacific Partnership Agreement

...ABSTRACT Trans- Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPPA) is now sound familiar to Malaysia, this is because that countries is one out of the twelve countries that involve in that agreement. The goals of the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), a much-delayed but significant trade agreement between 12 countries in Asia-Pacific and the Americas pushed by the US are increasingly becoming clearer after ongoing talks reveal some of the intentions Washington is pursuing with this pact. The highlighted of the agreement is to increase in import growth is projected to outpace increase in export growth, as the reductions in import tariffs and non-tariff measures (NTM) are larger for Malaysia relative to the other TPPA countries. According to The New York Times, economists are sharply split over the positive and negative effects of TPP, and both "opponents and supporters of the trade accord have quickly seized upon whichever analysis buttressed their own views. ECIPE has said in 2014 that TPP "will be the first ‘competing’ economic integration that is large enough to have a considerable negative impact on Europe. In the long-term, the negative effects will come from dynamic impact, e.g. on investment, productivity and competitiveness". Pascal Lamy called the TPP ‘the last of big old-style trade agreements’. It has said to be a negative impact on the oil and gas sector whose share of GDP is 12 per cent. PETRONAS stands to benefit very little from TPPA as 74 per cent of its exports are to non-TPPA...

Words: 7586 - Pages: 31

Premium Essay

Trans Pacic Partnership Agreement

...North C arolin a Polic y Wa t c h Cru cial Co nv ersa tion The Trans-Pa cific Partnership: Worse than NAFTA? Septemb er 2013 Lori Walla ch Public Citizen’s Global Trade Watch Outcomes of 20 Ye ars of NAFTA, WTO, FTAs… Crushing of Americ an Middle Class: more than 5 million US manufa cturing jobs (1 out of 4) & 60,000 US manufa cturing fa cilities gone. Millions of service sector jobs offshored: c all centers, computer, programming, engineering, a cc ounting. Wage “arbitrage” in a ra ce- to-the- bottom. U.S. re al median wages at ‘70s levels. Income inequality at Robb er-Baron-era levels. When manufa cturing, good jobs go tax bases shrink – and schools, public services, infrastructure cut, and construction sector unemployment soars. Floods of unsafe imported food, products. Financial deregulation, instability and repe ated financial crises. He alth, labor, land use, other public interest laws around world atta cked in foreign tribunals. Some dump ed. Initiatives chilled. Billions extra cted from taxpayers and paid to corporations for violations of new “rights.” Drug prices up. In poor nations, de adly cut in a cce ss to meds. Rich nation higher prices slam poor consumers, govt budg ets as Big PhRMA profits soar. U.S. loses 170,000 family farms. In ‘12, volume of U.S. food exports only 1% higher than ’95 (when NAFTA-WTO started). Imports of food now 97% above ‘95 level. Livelihoods of tens of millions of pe asant farmers destroyed, mass migrations...

Words: 4495 - Pages: 18

Premium Essay

Closer Economic Partnership Agreement

...opportunities for cooperation exist. Overall transparency restricts efforts to properly identify and report on the regulatory framework of China‟s ports. Regulation and Incentives The Shenzhen Free Trade Zone offers tax incentives as well as freedom in negotiating and entering into trade contracts. Local governments are empowered to issue incentives on top of central government initiatives. While incentives have traditionally focused on the manufacturing sector, Shenzhen is now encouraging the development of the services and logistics sectors. Incentives provided during the global downturn highlight the existence of a responsive and proactive approach to improving the Port of Shenzhen‟s competitiveness Closer Economic Partnership Agreement (CEPA) CEPA is one of Hong Kong‟s key attributes in taking advantage of China‟s rise. Numerous provisions of CEPA including supplements to the original text have enabled Hong Kong‟s marine sector to penetrate the Chinese market, especially in Shenzhen and the wider Guangdong Province. Future expansion of CEPA and introduction of further maritime-specific provisions will no doubt improve cooperation and benefit Hong Kong‟s maritime businesses. A Shift...

Words: 412 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Study on India & Japan Economic Partnership Agreement

...India-Japan Economic Partnership Agreement: Gains and Future Prospects Preface India signed a two-way Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (‘CEPA’ or ‘the Agreement’) with Japan on 16 February 2011. CEPA would provide a framework for enhanced cooperation between the two countries and is aimed to facilitate trade in goods and services and increase investment opportunities, besides protecting intellectual property rights. The Agreement is likely to be implemented from 1 April 2011. The highlights of CEPA have been provided below. CEPA The CEPA aims to reduce or eliminate tariffs over next 10 years on over 90 per cent of goods traded between the two countries. The Agreement inter alia provides ‘schedule for India’, a list detailing product wise plan for reduction/ elimination of duties for imports into India and a similar ‘schedule for Japan’. The quantum of duty reduction under CEPA will vary from product to product. Therefore, some products may see a complete elimination of duties on 1 April 2011 itself (or any other day on which the Agreement comes into force) while others may see a gradual reduction over years. Sensitive sectors for India and Japan are fully protected and will not see any tariff change. An illustrative list of goods for import into India and the time period over which basic customs duty would be eliminated is given below: |Description of goods |Period in which tariff to be reduced...

Words: 11812 - Pages: 48

Premium Essay

International Economic Laws

...Part 1 Business Enterprises in China 1.0 Introduction 2.0 Proprietorships 3.0 Partnerships 4.0 Corporates 1.0 Introduction In the People’s Republic of China, business organizations may be classified in to three main classes: individual proprietorships, partnerships, and corporations. The laws that effect these forms of business enterprises are diverse. There is no single code or statute that governs the PRC law of business enterprises. According to the sources of capital, there are domestic capital enterprises which are regulated by Sole Proprietorship Enterprise Law of the People's Republic of China , Partnership Business Law of the People's Republic of China, and Company Law of the People's Republic of China and foreign capital enterprises which are regulated by The Measures for Administration of the Establishment of the Partnership by Foreign Enterprises or Individuals within the Territory of China, Law of the People’s Republic of China on Chinese-Foreign Con-Tractual Joint Venture, Law of the People’s Republic of China on Chinese-Foreign Equity Joint Ventures, and Law of the People’s Republic of China on Foreign – Capital Enterprises. The relevant laws are the Security Law , the Fair Competition Law and the Antitrust Law. 2.0 Proprietorships 2.1What is a sole proprietorship enterprise A sole proprietorship enterprise means a business entity established within China with its capital contributed by one individual and its assts owned personally by the sole proprietor...

Words: 12251 - Pages: 50

Premium Essay

Docx

...Bin No. Box No. *, y : R0 Z.; Partnership Act, 1890. Year. [53 & 54 VICT] [CH. 39.] ARRANGEMENT OF SECTIONS. Nature of Partnership. Section. Definition of partnership. 2. Rules for determining existence of partnership. 3. Postponement of rights of person lending or selling in consideration of share of profits in case of 1. insolvency. 4. Meaning of firm. Relations of Partners to persons dealing with them. 5. Power of partner to bind the firm. 6. Partners bound by acts on behalf of firm. 7. Partner using credit of firm for private purposes. 8. Effect of notice that firm will not be bound by acts of partner. 9. Liability of partners. 10. Liability of the firm for wrongs. 11. Misapplication of money or property received for or in custody of the firm. 12. Liability for wrongs joint and several. 13. Improper employment of trust-property for partnership purposes. 14. Persons liable by "holding out." 15. Admissions and representations of partners. 16. Notice to acting partner to be notice to the firm. 17. Liabilities of incoming and outgoing partners. 18. Revocation of continuing guaranty by change in firm. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. Relations of Partners to one another. Variation by consent of terms of partnership. Partnership property. Property bought with partnership money. Conversion into personal estate of land held as partnership property. Procedure against partnership property for a partner's separate judgment...

Words: 6235 - Pages: 25

Premium Essay

Business Law 6

...people to create a partnership unintentionally? A partnership also may be created when two or more parties who do not have a written agreement or even an intention to form a partnership act in such a way as to lead third parties to believe that a partnership exists. 2. How can a person overcome prima facie evidence of a partnership? By showing that the share of profits received represented wages or payments of a debt, interest on a loan, rent, or the purchase price of a business or goods. 3. Under the Uniform Partnership Act, is partnership property owned in the name of the partnership or in the names of the partners? Under the Uniform Partnership Act, any partnership property, whether real or personal, may be owned either in the names of the partners or in the name of the firm. 4. What can personal creditors of one partner do to try to collect the partners debt form the partnership? The personal creditors of one partner can ask a court to order that payments due the debtor partner from the partnership be made to the creditors. They also can force the sale of a debtor partner’s interest in the partnership. 5. How will partnership profits and losses be share if the partnership agreement does not fix the ratio? If the partnership agreement does not fix the ratio of sharing the profits and the losses, they will be shared equally, not in proportion to the contribution to the capital. 6. If no date for the dissolution of a partnership is fixed at the...

Words: 1099 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

John

...BUSINESS ORGANIZATIONS INTRODUCTION This unit introduces students to the most common forms of business organizations, namely sole proprietorship, partnership and limited liability companies. However, emphasis is placed here on partnership and the legal consequences which flow from the formation of such a method. The main advantages and disadvantages of these forms of business organizations are also discussed. Important Concepts in Business Organizations The following are some important concepts in business organizations: Incorporation The law permits the creation of artificial or legal persons. An example of such is an incorporated company. This means that such an organization has a legal personality separate from its members. Legal Personality Under The English Law, all human beings have a legal personality. A legal personality is made up of a person’s legal rights and duties. However, the extent of these rights and duties is dependent on whether the person is an adult or a minor. A minor has limited rights and few duties. By operation of the law, an incorporated company has a legal personality Limited/unlimited Liability As a result of an incorporated organization having its own legal personality, its members are not generally liable for the debts of the organization. This however is in contrast to a partnership which does not have a legal personality separate from the partners. Here, partners have unlimited liability for partnership’s debts. Also, a sole proprietor...

Words: 3835 - Pages: 16

Premium Essay

Article

...Definition of Partnership A partnership is an arrangement in which two or more individuals share the profits and liabilities of a business venture. Various arrangements are possible: all partners might share liabilities and profits equally, or some partners may have limited liability. Not every partner is necessarily involved in the management and day-to-day operations of the venture. In some jurisdictions, partnerships enjoy favourable tax treatment relative to corporations.  http://www.investopedia.com/terms/p/partnership.asp#ixzz49Y975kkP  Types of Partnership A partnership is a business owned by two or more people. In most forms of partnerships, each partner has unlimited liability for the debts incurred by the business. The three typical classifications of for-profit partnerships are general partnerships, limited partnerships, and limited liability partnerships. 1. General Partnership: Partners divide responsibility for management and liability as well as the shares of profit or loss according to their internal agreement. Equal shares are assumed unless there is a written agreement that states differently. A general partnership involves two or more owners carrying out a business purpose. General partners share equal rights and responsibilities in connection with management of the business, and any individual partner can bind the entire group to a legal obligation. Each individual partner assumes full responsibility for all of the business's debts and obligations. ...

Words: 8398 - Pages: 34

Premium Essay

Chapter 2 Poblems: Corporations and Oter Business Association

...resale...Dale denied any intent to form a partnership; Shady testified that before the meeting with Harv: (1) Dale indicated “that she was interested in partnering up with me” and that they “needed to get rolling”, and that she would “hire an atty to legalize the agreement,” and (2) Dale and Shady “came to an agreement that Shady would deliver the spoil and Dale would pay the MSD invoices if Shady had trouble getting a loan,” and that “whatever monies we put into the operation to make it go, we’d get it back when we sold the spoil, and then we’d split the profits 50/50.” Whether the appellate court should affirm the trial court’s ruling that Dale and Shady had entered into either a partnership or a JV? A partnership may be formed pursuant to RUPA §202 if the parties merely have the intent to carry on a business for profit. There are no formal or legal requirements to form a partnership, and the subjective intent of the parties is unavailing. As in Byker v. Mannes, in ascertaining the existence of a partnership, the proper focus is whether the parties intended to, and in fact did, “carry on as co-owners of a business for profit,” not whether they intended to form a partnership. Pursuant to RUPA §202(a) all that is needed is for the parties to agree to jointly own and manage a business for profit as co-owners. Therefore, in the lack of a formalized partnership agreement, a court may still find that parties had entered a partnership for the purpose of owning and managing a...

Words: 1416 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Lit1

...Part A (the report) SOLE PROPRIETORSHIP: This business entity is the most common business used in the United States. This entity is owned and ran by one individual where there is no legal distinction between the owner and the business. This legal name of the business is the owner’s name; however, the business may operate under a fictitious name by filing a DBA. This person is legally accountable for all elements of the business including finances, loans and debts. One of the advantages of doing business as a Sole Proprietorship is that it’s easy to create. Another key advantage is the autonomy. Since the owner or individual is the business, he or she may decide for themselves whatever business decision they feel is needed to make, including the business finances. Some disadvantages would be that it is impossible to bring in others to do business being there can only be one owner. This also makes it difficult to raise capital in terms of seeking investors. Tax planning can also be challenging for the sole proprietor. Since there is no legal distinction between the owner and the business, all the income generated by the business is treated as ordinary personal income to the owner. • Liability: Sole Proprietors have unlimited liability. There is no difference between the owner and the business. Therefore, the owner is personally liable and responsible for all the business obligations and debt. Doing so makes all of the owner’s personal assets reachable to creditors. • Income...

Words: 2598 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

Organizational Forms of Business

...Organizational Forms of Business Legal issues for Business Organizations LIT1 July 23, 2012 * * * * * * * * * * * * * There are different types of business organizational structures. These structures include sole proprietorship, general partnership, limited partnership, C-Corporations, and S-Corporations. These structures each have advantages and disadvantages, depending on the particular situation or desired effects the business owners may have. It is imperative that owners understand the differences so they can choose the best organizational structure that fits their business needs. * Sole Proprietorship * One of the most common, easiest, and cost-effective organizational structures is a sole proprietorship. This form consists of one owner, and does not have any distinction between the business and the owner. Although sole proprietorships may seem less complex, it has disadvantages as well. * Sole proprietorships have several advantages and disadvantages as listed: * Liability – Sole proprietorship does not differentiate between the business and the owner. Sole proprietorships are liable for all losses. If the company were to get sued, the owner’s personal assets would also be at risk. The owner must file as a business if they are using a fictitious name; even if a company files a doing business as, also known as DBA, there is no legal separation of assets * Income Taxes – The...

Words: 2312 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Lit1 Task 1

...Lit1 Task 310.1.2-01-06 Part A Determining whether to start or invest in a business endeavor and what kind of business endeavor to choose can be challenging. Through this report the numerous types of business organizations will be assessed. By the end of the report you should have a greater comprehension of the different choices available. * Sole Proprietorship: To start off it is essential to have a clear understanding of what sole proprietorship means. As the sole proprietor you are the owner and the operator of that business. In more detail, the sole proprietor manages everything including setting up the business. An attorney is only needed if the sole proprietor plans to report the name of the business under a name other than their own. In that instance they would need to register the business with the government. * Liability: A full understanding of all liability and where it falls is very important. All liability falls on the owner on the company. This means that not only all of the company’s assets but also the owner’s personal belongings possibly will be occupied in any scenario where the company fails. More specifically, in the event that the company flops because of unfortunate market settings, poor business policy or if there is an injury suffered implicated by company products. The liability falls on the owner of the company including all characteristics of the business and can be brought into any legal actions. * Income Taxes: As a sole proprietor...

Words: 2781 - Pages: 12

Premium Essay

Lit1

...and operated by one person. * Profit Retention – At the owner’s discretion if funds are spent or re-invested back into the company as long as debt and obligations are paid. * Location – Sole proprietors need to comply with licensing requirements in the state in which they‘re doing business as well as local regulations and zoning ordinances. * Convenience/Burden – A convenience of sole proprietorship is that the owner pays taxes on income from the business as part of his or her personal income tax payments. A sole proprietor might consider it a burden when investors hardly invest into their company. GENERAL PARTNERSHIP General Partnership is a business organization consisting of two or more persons that have entered into a contract known as articles of partnership and share profit gains as well as losses. A major advantage of general partnership is that you have someone to share equal responsibility of the...

Words: 2321 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Lit1 Task 310.1.2-01-06

...Part A (The Report) Sole Proprietorship A sole proprietorship is the most common form of forming a business in the United States. The individual that forms the sole proprietorship and the business is one in the same. For example, if the business owes creditors money, the individual who created the sole proprietorship business has to pay the bill. When entering into contracts the individual is actually agreeing to the contract since the person and business is one in the same. The biggest advantage of doing business under a sole proprietorship is that it is extremely easy to form since the individual creating the sole proprietorship is the business. They are fully responsible for all aspects of the business including making good on payments, collecting monies from customers, and providing the goods or services to their clients. Another reason individuals create sole proprietorships is the flexibility they gain by owning their own business. Since they do not have anybody to report to they can do as they please as far as hours, vacations, expansion, or direction of the business. However, there are many disadvantages that come with a sole proprietorship business. Since the individual is the business they are responsible for all financial responsibilities. They are responsible for ensuring all payments to creditors are paid on-time and in full. If the individual runs into financial issues they are responsible without protection. Also, sole proprietorships can only have one owner...

Words: 3869 - Pages: 16