...Innovation within PepsiCo must be nurtured for the company to remain competitive. All employees should be encouraged to collaborate and initiate projects based on available resources. To accomplish this, all employees must have access to current information about inventory, supplies, new products, and research and development. Thus, PepsiCo should implement the PepsiCollab Innovation Portal. PepsiCollab is a virtual destination where the Research and Development department can post updates about products nearing the end of the pipeline. It is also a video conference center where the Distribution managers can compare data about efficiency and strategy. The idea is to give Pepsi employees a mechanism to socialize their work process, discuss problems within the company, and find out who the most qualified team members would be for a project. CEO Indra Nooyi recognizes the importance of innovation, which encouraged her to invest heavily in a new research and development program led by Mehmood Khan. The result of the investment is a world-class R&D lab with a focus on healthier products and obesity control. The scientists within the lab should not have to bare the whole weight of innovation, however, when it could be spread out over hundreds of thousands of people. Furthermore, the same scientists should not have any role in the marketing or distribution channels. PepsiCollab will be the primary hub for Pepsi workers to team up, or join projects already in motion. It is best to...
Words: 507 - Pages: 3
...the strategy implemented by PepsiCo to exploit rapidly growing markets opportunities by acquiring the organisations Tropicana, Gatorade and Quaker. The case study will highlight that it was imperative for the PepsiCo organisation to embark on a radical restructuring strategy to optimise their return on investments. The paper will discuss the rationale behind the critical restructuring .The benefits of the acquisitions and restructuring strategy will be discussed and motivated in detail. The strong existing competitive resources that PepsiCo and the new acquired brands in the North America region possess will be emphasised. The modifications to PepsiCo structure in 2001 and 2004 will be scrutinised to motivate and justify the decisions of the PepsiCo leadership. In addition the case study will evaluate the execution of the radical change and the tasks that should be performed by key resources. The emotional impact on employees due to the radical transformation and the key role employees should perform will be described. The focus of the paper will be on the function; the leadership of PepsiCo must perform and the potential roles the employees of PepsiCo could execute. Ultimately, the case study will discuss the complex relationship between structure and strategy. The paper will establish that PepsiCo had to regular acclimatise their strategy and structure to accomplish their organisational goals. Introduction Over a three year period from 1998-2001, PepsiCo made...
Words: 2894 - Pages: 12
...EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In the case study, PepsiCo is a producer of carbonated cola drink and was marketing its products in most countries around the world. PepsiCo’s competitor was Coca-Cola. PepsiCo made two acquisitions of Tropicana and Quaker and the view was that there was synergy and economies of scale to be gained. PepsiCo should have had an organisational structure that will enable the achievement of the organisational mission and objectives. The organisation reorganised their structure to a multidivisional structure in a move to exploit the full acquisition potential. A multidivisional structure is most suitable for an organisation that has not got a wide range of products like PepsiCo. The organisation did not experience benefits from the multidivisional structure because PepsiCo had a wide rage of products and different customers. The organisation was structured into divisions and each reporting to the headquarters and there was no synergies and economies of scale gained. PepsiCo revised the organisational structure to a matrix structure. It enabled the organisation to operate in its particular competitive situation at peak effectiveness. At Pepsi they discovered that it was essential to drive the various brands as part of one team. There was less conflict between employees because of the hierarchical setup of the organisation. PepsiCo Beverages became the No 1 liquid refreshment beverage company in measured channels. There was a strategic fit as its strengths in the...
Words: 2510 - Pages: 11
...content External Analysis: 2 Macro environment: 2 Meso environment: 5 Internal Analysis 7 SWOT Analysis Pepsi case: 9 Objectives 10 Marketing Strategy 10 Marketing Plan 12 Product 12 Place 14 Price 14 Budget & Control 15 External Analysis: Macro environment: The environment is constantly changing and therefore also influencing PepsiCo’s operations. Environmental changes which are not directly involved with the company but do influence it can be put in six categories: economic, technological, political, cultural, natural and international changes. These changes and their influence on PepsiCo Canada are described per category. Management R. L. Draft, M. Kendrick, N. Vershinina, the general environment page 85-91. Economic In March 2012 Canada’s economy was ranked 11th of the world with a GDP of $1,759 billion. Canada is a wealthy nation with a very high standard of living and is also one of the world’s top trading nations. Since the 2008 world financial crisis Canada has emerged as one of the strongest developed economies in the world. The GDP growth of Canada in 2010 was more than 3% even though most of the World’s Western countries were in an economic recession. The stability of the Canadian economy even during a World financial crisis makes Canada a great country to operate in for a multinational like PepsiCo. http://www.rediff.com/business/slide-show/slide-show-1-worlds-20-economic-superpowers/20120312.htm http://www.economywatch.com/world_economy/canada/...
Words: 3700 - Pages: 15
...Joson, Gerard Gio R. EMG166-T Case analysis no. 11 – Pepsico’s Diversification Strategy In 2008 December 5, 2011 Overview Pepsico is an American multinational corporation headquartered in Purchase, New York, United States, with interests in the manufacturing, marketing and distribution of grain-based snack foods, beverages, and other products. PepsiCo is a world leader in convenient foods and beverages, with revenues of about $25 billion and over 142,000 employees. The company consists of the snack business of Frito-Lay North America and the beverage and food businesses of PepsiCo Beverages and Foods, which includes PepsiCo Beverages North America (Pepsi-Cola North America and Gatorade/Tropicana North America) and Quaker Foods North America. PepsiCo International includes the snack businesses of Frito-Lay International and beverage businesses of PepsiCo Beverages International. PepsiCo brands are available in nearly 200 countries and territories. Many of PepsiCo's brand names are over 100-years-old, but the corporation is relatively young. PepsiCo was founded in 1965 through the merger of Pepsi-Cola and Frito-Lay. Tropicana was acquired in 1998 and PepsiCo merged with The Quaker Oats Company, including Gatorade, in 2001. PepsiCo’s success is the result of superior products, high standards of performance, distinctive competitive strategies and the high integrity of our people. Our mission is to be the world's premier consumer products company focused on convenient...
Words: 3312 - Pages: 14
...PepsiCo 2005 Case Analysis June 17, 2009 I. Definition of the Issue The PepsiCo-2005 case study has several issues revolving it. It has the internal issue that PepsiCo has not been able to consistently meet its growth goal of 15+ percent annual increase in earnings for the last 10 years. Its external issues consist of its products as reaching maturity stage industry wise and its divisions, except Frito-Lay North America (FLNA), fail to rank highest in its respective market segments. Division wise, the company holds a large share of each respective market, but over-all the company sustains a flat growth rate and fails to meet its growth goal. In respect to this, it can be seen that the real issue in this case is the need of a strategy to sustain a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) in earnings per share of 15 percent per year. This paper aims to develop a three-year strategic plan for PEPSICO that can best ensure this growth through this decade. II. Objectives The paper’s objectives include designing of alternatives that may aid its development for a sound strategy in response to the issue through a quantitative analysis. The paper would also include an analysis of each alternative. From the generated alternatives, the paper would focus on one that would seem to best apply to the given circumstances. The paper also includes a potential problem analysis to aid in strengthening the strategy’s defenses and enables the company to predict and anticipate...
Words: 1829 - Pages: 8
...ensure quality, flexibility and responsiveness. In addition to the capabilities is a prestigious brand, talented and diverse human resources who understands the market and works in a positive work environment. Coca cola strategic competitiveness; They include but not limited to the following, developing business model to continue exploring and participating in new lines of beverages, extending existing product lines and effectively advertising and marketing products. Secondly its strategic acquisitions by entering into agreements to acquire companies, expanding bottled water strategy through innovations and selective acquisitions to maximize profitability across market territories. Coca cola is also strengthening its selling capabilities and go to market strategies, including pre sale, conventional selling and hybrid router in order to get closer to its clients. Implementing selective packaging strategies designed to increase consumer demand for our products and to build a strong returnable base. Coca cola is also committing to building a multi-cultural, collaborative team, from top to bottom and broadening geographic footprint through organic growth and strategic joint venture, mergers and acquisitions. 2.2 Competitive Advantage of Coca Cola Company Market leadership: It has a variety of beverages in the world, with operations in Mexico, Guatemala, Nicaragua, Costa Rica, Panama, Colombia, Venezuela, Argentina, Brazil and the Philippines. Business partnerships: The Coca-Cola...
Words: 1154 - Pages: 5
...PepsiCo Case Study Analysis Paper Michael Gillespie Organizational Policy and Strategy, OML-450, Cohort (835) Professor Vicky Sons-Eiden September 15, 2011 PepsiCo Case Study Analysis Paper A case study analysis on PepsiCo’s diversion strategy in 2008 will be addressed in this paper. The elements that will be discussed are the vision and mission of PepsiCo, the background and history of the company, the external and internal forces of PepsiCo’s business environment, PepsiCo’s strategic marketing plan, and a conclusion and recommendations on how the PepsiCo company can improve their business strategy to stay competitive in years to come. Vision and Mission The vision of PepsiCo is to be a responsible company that supports continuous improvement of all areas across the globe in which they operate. These areas include the environment, social, and economic conditions creating a better future then the present. The mission of PepsiCo is to be the best company in the industry that provides convenient foods and beverages to the consumer. The company has a goal to provide financial benefits and growth for its shareholders as the company provides growth for its employees, its business partners, and the communities in which they are established. In all aspect of the business, PepsiCo strives to be the leader in honesty, fairness, and integrity. (PepsiCo, 2011). Company History PepsiCo Inc. was formed in 1965 when Pepsi-Cola Bottling merged with salty snack icon Frito...
Words: 2714 - Pages: 11
...Running head: COCA-COLA AND PEPSICO Coca-Cola and PepsiCo: Similarities and Differences Lamar Smith Michel Brown Annette Pete May Valencia Cardinal Stritch University MGT 426 August 18, 2011 Submitted to the faculty of Cardinal Stritch University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Science in Management. Introduction Two of the largest and most profitable corporations in the United States are the Atlanta, Georgia based Coca-Cola Company and the New York based Pepsi Cola Company. While both are called "colas" they both attempt to address the same target tastes but from different approaches. Coke was the first on market with what is still a "secret" formula and Pepsi followed with a similar (not exact) taste. Since taste is very much a factor of your personal likes, either or neither may appeal to you or seem sweeter (Inforefuge.com. 2011). This paper will discuss the similarities and differences in the processes used by Coca-Cola and PepsiCo for place, price, and promotion. Place and Price The marketing exposure of PepsiCo and Coca-Cola is everywhere ranging from commercials, billboards, and mail advertisements all over the world. Although they target the same markets, they both use different approaches to their marketing strategies. This is evident when comparing the two companies’ websites. When browsing the Coca-Cola website you will experience a more conservative style; there is...
Words: 720 - Pages: 3
...Discuss how PepsiCo uses its talent to sustain a competitive advantage in the marketplace. PepsiCo sustain a competitive advantage in the marketplace through talent acquisition, talent management and development, PepsiCo University, and inclusive culture. Talent acquisition is defined as finding the right talent when needed and delivering a consistent candidate experience across the attraction, recruitment, hiring, and onboarding process. Talent management and development is building bench strength for key leadership positions and delivering talent development opportunities and capability for employee learning. Learning at PepsiCo’s University, individuals will have a broad accessibility in a learning environment at culture is described as shaping the PepsiCo culture and reinforcing the behaviors required to support the talent of the present and the future that reflects multicultural, multigenerational, and global needs. (Church, 2010) PepsiCo’s approach on talent acquisition is mainly driven by their philosophy on talent management. They look for and acquire talent based on the potential of growth within the company, for that particular individual; grooming its employees to take on more advanced and functional roles within the company. PepsiCo prides itself on having a “bench”. The bench being more than one person to fill that particular role/ position as it becomes available, or as the company needs it to be filled. With more than one option to choose from PepsiCo, has a high...
Words: 1858 - Pages: 8
...PEPSICO CORPORATION STOCK ANALYSIS Presented by: St. John’s University Undergraduate Student Managed Investment Fund April 29, 2003 Recommendation: Purchase 400 shares of PepsiCo stock at market order Industry: Food and Beverage Kristopher Cartagena – kcart26@yahoo.com Dion Demetropoulos – Ddeme829@aol.com Tenisha Martin – tenishax@hotmail.com Share Data: Price - $42.65 Date – April 25, 2003 Target Price - $50.65 52 Week Price Range - $53.23 - $34.00 Market Capitalization – 74.5 billion Shares Outstanding – 1.72 billion Revenue 2002 – $25.112 billion Stock Chart: Fundamentals: P/E 2002 – 22x P/E 2003 – 19x Earnings Per Share Estimate: EPS 2003E = $2.28 EPS 2003 Consensus = $2.20 EPS 2004E = $2.45 EPS 2004 Consensus = $2.44 MEMORANDUM TO: Student Managed Investment Fund St. John’s University FROM: Kristopher Cartagena Dion Demetropoulos Tenisha Martin DATE: April 29, 2003 SUBJECT: ANALYSIS OF PEPSICO STOCK AS AN UNDERVALUED SECURITY This is the research report that was requested on January 23, 2003 about PepsiCo stock and whether it should be incorporated in to the Student Managed Investment Fund. The analysis was done primarily through secondary research. The analysis revealed that PepsiCo’s stock is currently undervalued at $42.65, as of April 25, 2003. We used a relative valuation model, and determined PepsiCo’s target price to be $50.65. In addition, we used a multi-stage dividend discount model, and determined...
Words: 11215 - Pages: 45
...Paulo Nazario, Onur Saka and Juliette Clark International Business Policies and Strategies, Winter Quarter 2011 11/29/11 CASE 11: PepsiCo’s Diversification Strategy in 2008 Page 1 1. BACKGROUND INFORMATION Time Country(s) Involved Key Individuals & frame MileStones Titles 1965- Headquarters in Indra Krishnamurthy 2008 Purchase, New York, Nooyi, Chairman of USA. Operations the Board and CEO (2006-). global in scope. Steven Reinemund (CEO 2001-2006). Roger Enrico (CEO 1996-2001). Donald Kendall and Herman Lay, Founders. Company Type & Size PepsiCo is a publicly traded company, listed on the NYSE, NASDAQ, and as a component of the S&P 500. In 2010 it had 294,000 employees worldwide. As of November 2011, it had a market cap of $101.02 billion. 1965 Merger with Frito-Lay CEO of Pepsi Cola, and engineer of PEPSICO Merger, Donald Kendal Diversification outside snacks and beverages Acquisition of Pizza Hut, Taco Bell, KFC Acquisition of 7UP, Mug Root Beer, SunChips, Introduction of Aquafina - 1993 Portfolio Reconstruction Roger Enrico, CEO (1996-2001) Wayne Colloway, CEO (1986-1996) "Potato chips make you thirsty; Pepsi satisfies thirst." Donald Kendall on merger. 1970s 1980s ‘Balanced three leg stool’ describes Wayne Colloway, however, strategic fit problems occurs 1990s Bottled water business starts. 1997 Due to several strategic fit problems, restaurant businesses have been spun off to form Tricon, later Yum! Brands. FTC’s bans to jointly distribute Gatorade with Pepsi...
Words: 4668 - Pages: 19
...PepsiCo analysis: Internal and External Analysis of the Company Suheir Shalabi Missouri Baptist University PepsiCo analysis: Internal and External Analysis of the Company PepsiCo. What people think of it? Do they think it is only beverage drinks’ company? Do they really know that PepsiCo go beyond beverage drinks to add in cookies, chips and may other snacks? Being advanced in more than beverage drinks can explain PepsiCo strategies. According to their web-site, PepsiCo strategies are, Expand the global leadership position of our snacks business. Ensure sustainable, profitable growth in global beverages, unleash the power of "Power of One", rapidly expand our "Good-for-You" portfolio, continue to deliver on our environmental sustainability goals and commitments, cherish our associates and develop the leadership to sustain our growth. (PepsiCo, 2015) In addition to their strategies, PepsiCo develop their mission statement to match out their strategies in order to be able to gain success. As their web-site cited, their mission statement is: Our mission is to be the world's premier consumer products company focused on convenient foods and beverages. We seek to produce financial rewards to investors as we provide opportunities for growth and enrichment to our employees, our business partners and the communities in which we operate. And in everything we do, we strive for honesty, fairness and integrity. (PepsiCo, 2015). Most people agree that PepsiCo have competitive...
Words: 1204 - Pages: 5
...Introduction: This case study will analyse the fast moving consumer goods industry (FMCG) as well as perform firm level analysis for of PepsiCo, a leading global food and beverage company with over $66 billion in net average annual revenues, generated through a global portfolio of diverse and beloved brands. The FMCG industry is a dynamic industry where value capture and value creation are a product of high productivity, strategic branding, strong distribution capacity, and in-depth marketing and communications strategies. The industry is mature and comprised of a number of competitors seeking to expand market share and improve competitive advantage. Our analysis of PepsiCo, as well as the FMCG industry, will focus on a number of the primary elements including the company’s competitive positioning and the market forces that shape the industry. We will use Porter’s industry 5 forces analysis to review the elements that drive positioning. Additionally, PepsiCo’s position and competitive advantage within the industry will be analysed using the “Who, What, How” tools, “VRIO” analysis, “Industry life Cycle” analysis, “Value Chain” and “Value Curve” assessments. INDUSTRY LEVEL ANALYSIS: Fast moving consumer good is one of biggest industry globally it terms of its number of brands and awareness. It is an industry with love brands, i.e. the day to day brands that you love and known forever. The products that wide spread from kitchen to toilets and living rooms to bedrooms...
Words: 4807 - Pages: 20
...PepsiCo Problem PepsiCo’s business strategies were working out very well for them except for in their international operations. The international segment had relatively low profit margins which meant that PepsiCo needed to implement a new organizational structure that would better utilize strategic fits between the company’s international operations. Also, the operating margins and profitability across the different geographic areas and product lines varied a lot for PepsiCo. Gaining some more stability throughout each area and product line would increase the company’s growth and strength within their targeted markets. Situation Analysis In 1997 PepsiCo set out to accomplish a major portfolio restructuring through acquisitions, product innovation, international expansion, and close relationships with distribution allies. All of this restructuring proved positive for the company and they saw success in many areas. They saw their international snack volume grow by 9 percent and the international beverage volume increased by 8 percent in 2007. However, PepsiCo’s international operations were much less profitable than its businesses operating in North America. The company did notice opportunities for growth in these international markets, though. PepsiCo executives expected that, by 2010, China and Brazil would be the two largest international markets for snacks. They also found that it could grow international sales through its Power of One Strategy. Through research PepsiCo...
Words: 1046 - Pages: 5
