Free Essay

Physicians Assisted Suicide

In: Social Issues

Submitted By LeeCollegeHelp
Words 3316
Pages 14
Physicians-Assisted Suicide Physician-Assisted Suicide is a medical process where a physician supplies a terminally ill patient with a prescription for one dose of lethal medication. The prescription is given to a patient upon request only if the patient intends to end his or her own life because of suffrage from a terminal illness. Today, physicians-assisted suicide is more commonly known as the Death-With-Dignity Act. Recent stories of patients who have attempted to end their own life by lethal medication have made countless headlines concerning the topic throughout many informational sources. Currently, the states of Washington, Oregon, and Vermont are the only three states that have adopted the Death-With-Dignity Act.
Physician-Assisted Suicide is among many practices that aid in ending a patient’s life along with DNR’s, DNI’s, and AND’s, when life-sustaining treatments are denied. Physicians-Assisted Suicide is much more controversial than other life ending methods because it enables a patient to end her or her own life in a way that many individuals feel is immoral and unethical. The ethical issues of physicians-assisted suicide are both emotional and controversial, yet healthcare workers deal with a request for this alternative every day. Is physicians-assisted suicide the answer? The question doesn’t come by an easy answer. However, both sides of the debate, either for it or against it, provide strong, concrete points that help truly uncover where the controversy lies. This paper will discuss both sides of the argument followed by a research based conclusion.
The debate whether or not physicians-assisted suicide should be legalized or not seems to weigh heavier on the opposing side rather than those who support the idea. Individuals have argued that it is not ethically permissible because the concept behind physicians-assisted suicide contradicts the traditional duty of the physician to preserve life and to do no harm. The role of a physician is to use their skills to alleviate the medical conditions that cause suffering during a time where a patient is in distress or discomfort. These conditions can be both somatic, including symptoms like pain and nausea and psychological which involve anxiety or depression. Many physicians and patients have agreed that from a professional standpoint, there aren’t any levels of discomfort sufficient enough for a physician to justify assisting suicide. Individuals who feel that physicians-assisted suicide contradicts the traditional duty of the physician also argue that the practice goes against the Hippocratic Oath. The Hippocratic Oath is a widely known Greek medical text that requires new physicians to swear upon a number or healing gods that he or she will uphold a number of professional ethical standards. The Oath was written in the late 5th century BC, but the principle behind it still remains sacred to many doctors today. The Hippocratic Oath infers that physicians should not deliberately do harm to their patients. This means that they should not intentionally worsen the case of a patient who is ill if worsening of the case would potentially being upon death quicker than it would otherwise. When a physician takes the Hippocratic Oath, they adopt the concept that they will not take part in any practice related to assisting suicide. The oath specifically states, “I will not give a lethal drug to anyone if I am asking, nor will I advise such a plan.”
Another argument that is brought up from those who are opposed to physicians-assisted suicide is a concept known as slippery slope. Slippery slope states if one part of a practice or activity is allowed eventually it would lead to the acceptance of more and more parts of that activity that would usually be deemed unacceptable. Many argue that if physicians-assisted suicide were legalized, abuse would take place that could ultimately lead to euthanasia. Euthanasia is commonly misinterpreted and easily thought of as the same concept as physicians-assisted suicide. Euthanasia, unlike physician-assisted suicide is when the physician physically aids in the death of the patient by a lethal injection. This concept is not legalized anywhere. States who have adopted the Death-With-Dignity Act have done so because the patient is in full control of the consumption of the drug. The only aid the physician provides is administering the prescription for the lethal substance. Those who are opposed to physicians-assisted suicide feel that the concept of the practice enforces death that might not be fully supported by the patient’s choice entirely; but instead influenced by the physician themselves. This possibility could affect patients who might be in a vulnerable state, such as the elderly, to be pressured to choose physicians-assisted suicide over more complex and expensive alternatives such as a nursing home. Fallibility is another reason why some are opposed to physicians-assisted suicide. The argument here is that physicians could, and sometimes do, make mistakes. There could be a misjudgment in a diagnosis or a prognosis, errors in the treatment of depression, misguidance in the treatment of pain, and so on. The Death-With-Dignity Act has a list of requirements in place in order for a patient to qualify as a candidate for the drug in attempt to prevent the drug being misused. One requirement specifies that the patient must be diagnosed with a terminal illness that will lead to death within a six month time frame. Studies of autopsies have shown that doctors misdiagnose fatal illnesses about 20 percent of the time concluding that millions of patients are currently being treated for the wrong disease.Since so many misdiagnoses happen, those opposed to physicians-assisted suicide believe that physicians have an obligation to protect lives from these inevitable mistakes and to improve the quality of pain and symptom management during the end of life, but nothing further. Religious groups are also opposed to physician-assisted suicide because secular organizations view the concept as morally wrong because it diminishes the sanctity of life. Many churches feel that the period just before death is a spiritual time and they believe it is wrong to interfere with the process of dying because it would interrupt the process of the spirit moving towards God. Christianity also views those in a vegetative state to still be human beings, even though their mental state is impaired. Christians value their wishes the same as anyone else’s and they believe it would be immoral to treat those in a vegetation state as less worthy as those in a healthy state and to therefore conclude that they would be better off dead. Also Christians feel that the lives of patients, who are old or sick, facing the end of death, still share the same values as any other human being .
Other religious groups share the same beliefs are Christians do. The Anglican Church states that “There is a very strong compassionate case for physicians-assisted dying, but the Anglican Church remains opposed to the practice.” Baptists feel that “assisted dying violates the sanctity of human life.” Eastern Orthodox states that “Physician assisted dying is morally and theologically impermissible because of God’s sovereignty and the sanctity of human life.”
Although the arguments are strong supporting why physicians assisted suicide should not be legalized, there are still many who are supporters of the legalization. Those who support physicians-assisted suicide believe that competent people should have the right to choose the timing and the manner of their death because decisions about death are a personal subject. In addition, those suffering from terminal illnesses suffer from tremendous pain and suffering. Many terminal diseases, such as cancers, can result in a slow, painful death.
Supporters of physicians-assisted suicide make the argument that patients should be able to die with dignity rather than have an illness entirely degrade them by disabling them from taking care of themselves. Sometimes, when patients are in a vulnerable state, a nurse has to attend to the patient for activities such as vomiting, drooling, urinating, and other bodily functions. Alzheimer’s patients, for example, suffer from dementia that gets progressively worse over time, causing memory loss and the patient could then become incoherent. Supports make the claim that those in that type of state want to be remembered by how they once were and not by what the disease has done to them, so if the patient chooses to die before facing those effects, they should be entitled to. Also, those who support physicians-assisted suicide argue that the decision to end one’s life is a personal and private manner that does not physically harm anyone else so the government and medical professions should find the concept permissible.
Patients already have the right to be taken off of life support when in a vegetation state. Some advocates of physicians-assisted suicide argue that physicians have enough experience and knowledge to understand how long a patient has left to live and that the patient shouldn’t suffer the months leading up until death. The right to die should be a fundamental freedom of each person. There is not a line in the constitution that implies that the government has the right to keep a person from committing suicide. Therefore, in a free country, physicians-assisted suicide should be a fundamental right. Brittany Maynard, a 29-year old suffering from stage 4 Glioblastoma, moved to Oregon from San Francisco, so that she would be eligible for the lethal prescription. She decided that she would consume the drug on November 1st, 2014. On October 6th, 2014 she released a statement saying “There is not a cell in my body that is suicidal or that wants to die. I want to live. I wish there was a cure for my disease but there's not... My glioblastoma is going to kill me, and that's out of my control. I've discussed with many experts how I would die from it, and it's a terrible, terrible way to die. Being able to choose to go with dignity is less terrifying... Right now it's a choice that's only available to some Americans, which is really unethical... The amount of sacrifice and change my family had to go through in order to get me legal access to Death with Dignity--changing our residency [from California to Oregon], establishing a team of doctors, having a place to live--was profound... There's tons of Americans who don't have time or the ability or finances [to move to a legal state] and I don't think that's right or fair... I believe this choice is ethical, and what makes it ethical is it is a choice. The patient can change their mind up to the last minute. I feel very protected here in Oregon" Some advocates feel that physician-assisted suicide should be legalized only if palliative care provides better assistant to those in need. The theory behind the connection between the two is that as the palliative care grows stronger and more efficient, the desire for physicians-assisted suicide will suppress. In the first wave of cases of physicians-assisted suicide that occurred since the process became legal in Oregon, patients were more concerned about their loss of autonomy and control rather than the fear of pain and suffering. Arguments supporting physicians-assisted suicide stress the importance to relieve patient suffering by understanding the duty to respect patient autonomy. The suffering of patients towards the end of their life can be extremely difficult. Studies have shown that the trust between patients and physicians is broken when physicians-assisted suicide is not an option for treatment or discussion. 72% of patients feel that they would be more open to discussing other options if they felt connected with the physician emotionally. From the advocate standpoint, physicians-assisted suicide is a form of compassion because it shows respect for the patient’s choices. A controversial argument made by those who support physicians-assisted suicide is that there are many potential cost savings from this alternative as compared to other medical care such as nursing homes and Medicare. The United States spends an excessive amount on health care for terminally ill patients. Expenses increase as death approaches and approximately 30 percent of the Medicare budget is spent on the 5 percent of Medicare patients who die each year. Many advocates of physicians-assisted suicide have made the connection that enabling the concept will reduce the high cost of death. One supporter from the medical field stated that “Many have linked the effort to reduce the high cost of death with the legalization of physician-assisted suicide. Managed care and managed death [through physician-assisted suicide] are less expensive than fee-for-service care and extended survival. Less expensive is better. Decreasing availability and increasing expense in health care and the uncertain impact of managed care may intensify pressure to choose physician-assisted suicide and the cost effectiveness of hastened death is as undeniable as gravity. The earlier a patient dies, the less costly is his or her care. Indeed, the Supreme Court noted the potential for cost-saving motives to influence the legalization and use of physician-assisted suicide, speculating that “if physician-assisted suicide were permitted, many might resort to it to spare their families the substantial financial burden of end-of-life health care costs. The drugs necessary for physicians-assisted suicide also only cost about $75-$100.” After extensive research on physicians-assisted suicide, I have to conclude that the practice should be permissible. The majority of the research that I found against physicians-assisted suicide shows countless claims from individuals stating how the practice should be impermissible because it goes against moral, ethical, and religious guidelines. Also, they claim that physicians-assisted suicide goes against the Hippocratic Oath of doctors because physicians agree to never give a patient a lethal drug. Some protestors against physicians-assisted suicide have made claims about fallibility and the slippery-slope possibility. The reasons I feel that these arguments aren’t enough to persuade me to agree to choose that physicians-assisted suicide should be impermissible is because the claims are dominantly about a person’s feelings and beliefs. Although there was research to support the fallibility claim by showing the amount of times physicians make mistakes, I feel the bottom line only because a trust issue which relates to one’s feelings towards the practice. Also, the slippery-slope concept can happen with any situation. The risk of matters becoming worse from allowing a situation to take place happens in almost every situation in life. That concept is not enough by itself to prove the high degree of fault in allowing physicians-assisted suicide to take place. The research doesn’t show enough factual evidence to support why allowing physicians-assisted suicide would be damaging. The feelings and beliefs standpoints are not concrete and powerful enough to truly enforce why the practice of physicians-assisted suicide should be impermissible. The majority of the research that I found for those who feel that physicians-assisted suicide should be permissible provides strong supporting evidence for the decision. Surveys have shown that the majority of patients feel that they can’t communicate with their physicians enough on a personal level. Testimonies have proven that patients feel that if physicians-assisted suicide was an open topic for discussion and treatment, they would be more inclined to listen to alternative options because they would feel like the physicians truly care about giving them the best care possible. The statistics showing how many patients would feel more comfortable by knowing physicians-assisted suicide was an option is significant enough for me to consider the practice being permissible. The research I found regarding the cost benefit of physicians-assisted suicide as compared to Medicare and nursing homes plays a big part in why I feel the practice should be permissible. Putting feelings and right from wrong aside, the lethal drug only cost $75-$100 and it’s a one-time payment. Medicare costs hundreds and thousands of dollars each month and is only available to patients 65 or older. Physicians-assisted suicide’s target market is any patient suffering from a terminal illness no matter the age. Also, nursing homes cost thousands of dollars each month as well. When I researched the Brittany Maynard story, I discovered a lot of information about the cancer she suffered from; Glioblastoma. Glioblastoma is a brain cancer that usually starts out as stage four and there is not currently a cure. The cancer usually kills the patient within the same year they’re diagnosed with the disease. The side effects are horrific and patients have documented some of the most unbearable pain on record. Brittany Maynard’s research of her disease showed that she would’ve suffered an extremely painful death if she waited for the cancer to end her life. By choosing to consume the lethal drug associated with physicians-assisted suicide, she was able to have a less painful death in a state of mind where she could still maintain control of her motor skills and consciousness. The research that this case presented showed significant information how by allowing physicians-assisted suicide, it allowed a patient who was without a doubt going to die within a couple months, suffer less pain.
The medical field is designed to help a patient while keeping their best interest in mind. Moral and ethical standpoints are not sufficient enough to support a person’s best interest. Moral, ethical and even religious standpoint, in reality, reflects really only the person who is stating their opinion. What someone feels is right might not actually be what is the right choice for the patient. That is I have disregarded the research and information I discovered for why physicians-assisted suicide should not be allowed. In my opinion based on my research, physician-assisted suicide is permissible.

Bibliography BBC News - (n.d.). Retrieved October 25, 2014.
Benatar, D. (2010, October 1). Should there be a right to die? Retrieved October 25, 2014.
Colgrass, N. (2014, October 13). 29-year-old woman: Why I'm taking my own life. USAtoday.
Death with Dignity Acts. (n.d.). Retrieved October 25, 2014.
Dobie, M. (n.d.). Brittany Maynard's choice to die. Newsday, p. A33.
Gorsuch, N. (2009). The Future of Assisted Suicide and Euthansia (pp. 35-41). Princeton Printing Press.
Hedlund, S. (2005, March 1). Death with Dignity: The Oregon Experience. p. 16. Retrieved October 25, 2014.
Leonhardt, D. (2006, February 22). Why Doctors So Often Get It Wrong. The New York Times.
Miles, S. (2005). The Hippocratic Oath and the ethics of medicine (p. 16). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
WebMD - Better information. Better health. (n.d.). Retrieved October 25, 2014.

--------------------------------------------
[ 1 ]. Death with Dignity Acts. (n.d.). Retrieved October 25, 2014.
[ 2 ]. WebMD - Better information. Better health. (n.d.). Retrieved October 25, 2014.
[ 3 ]. Miles, S. (2005). The Hippocratic Oath and the ethics of medicine (p. 16). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[ 4 ]. WebMD - Better information. Better health. (n.d.). Retrieved October 25, 2014.
[ 5 ]. Hedlund, S. (2005, March 1). Death with Dignity: The Oregon Experience. p. 16. Retrieved October 25, 2014.
[ 6 ]. Leonhardt, D. (2006, February 22). Why Doctors So Often Get It Wrong. The New York Times.
[ 7 ]. BBC News - (n.d.). Retrieved October 25, 2014.
[ 8 ]. BBC News - (n.d.). Retrieved October 25, 2014.
[ 9 ]. Benatar, D. (2010, October 1). Should there be a right to die? Retrieved October 25, 2014.
[ 10 ]. Gorsuch, N. (2009). The Future of Assisted Suicide and Euthansia (pp. 35-41). Princeton Printing Press.
[ 11 ]. Miles, S. (2005). The Hippocratic Oath and the ethics of medicine (p. 16). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[ 12 ]. Dobie, M. (n.d.). Brittany Maynard's choice to die. Newsday, p. A33.
[ 13 ]. For more information search for “Brittany Maynard”
[ 14 ]. WebMD - Better information. Better health. (n.d.). Retrieved October 25, 2014.
[ 15 ]. WebMD - Better information. Better health. (n.d.). Retrieved October 25, 2014.
[ 16 ]. WebMD - Better information. Better health. (n.d.). Retrieved October 25, 2014.

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Physician Assisted Suicide

...Physician Assisted Suicide Lawmakers in Connecticut are again taking up the issue of physician-assisted suicide. A physician-assisted suicide bill in Connecticut is up for its first legislative hearing before the General Assembly’s Public Health Committee. With this bill two physicians would have to certify, in writing, under oath, that their patient is terminally ill and is likely to die within the next six months. Additionally, the patient must be mentally competent to make an informed decision about his or her own death. A similar bill was proposed in 2009. Perhaps the strongest argument made on behalf of legalizing euthanasia or assisted suicide is that it, like abortion, is a "choice" issue. Supporters dispute that euthanasia/assisted suicide is the ultimate civil right, and to deprive mentally competent, terminally ill people who want to end their suffering is to disrespect their rights. Supporters also argue that legalizing euthanasia/assisted suicide ensures that no one dies in painful agony or suffering. Opposes contend that laws against euthanasia and assisted suicide are in place to prevent abuse and to protect people from unscrupulous doctors and others. Proponents also claim that opposition to euthanasia/assisted suicide is based primarily in religion and that laws prohibiting the practice are thus unconstitutional because they violate the division between church and state. We all die; however, in an age of amplified longevity and medical advances, death...

Words: 308 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Physician Assisted-Suicide

...unpleasant, the patient should have the right to reduce this unpleasantness. In medicine, the prolongation of living may sometimes turn into the prolongation of dying. Put simply - why should be patient be forced to experience a slow death? Most physicians have received one or more requests to help a patient end his or her life prematurely. This module focuses on the skills that the physician can use to respond both compassionately and with confidence to a request, not on the merits of arguments for or against legalizing physician-assisted suicide (PAS) or euthanasia, but using solid clinical skills. To respond effectively, physicians must know the reasons why patients ask for assistance. Depression, psychosocial factors, and anticipated distress are common reasons, but current physical suffering can also be a factor. Physicians need to be able to assess the root causes of the specific request, make a commitment to the patient’s care, address each of the patient’s sources of suffering, educate the patient about legal alternatives, and seek counsel from colleagues. The vast majority of requests for PAS or euthanasia should abate when approached in this way. Oregon The state of Oregon has had a physician-assisted suicide law since 1994 which was implemented in 1998. Since then more than 341 terminally ill people have taken...

Words: 2055 - Pages: 9

Free Essay

Physician Assisted Suicide

...Physician Assisted Suicide Physician assisted suicide is a very controversial subject in today's society. Physician assisted suicide is when one voluntarily makes the decision to end life due to a terminal illness. In my opinion, physician assisted suicide is not ethical because; many people feel taking of a life is morally wrong, it shows no respect for humanity, and it takes ones dignity away. Physician assisted suicide and Euthanasia exist and neither are morally correct. Nothing about ending one's life is ethically right. An act as such would be considered an act od virtue ethics. "Virtue ethics is distinct from both utilitarianism and deontology. Rather than focusing on the consequences of the act we wish to evaluate or the rule that guides the action, we look at the character of the person performing the act."(Mosser, 2010) Each having the same outcome but still different, physician assisted suicide is when a physician gives the patient means to commit suicide but not administering it personally.Euthanasia is a lethal dosage of medicine administered by a physician. (Gula,1999a) This process is called death by mercy but some see it as murder. Death is a natural part of living. Death is something that occurs somewhere every second of the day, it should be from natural cause or accidental never should it be doctor promoted . When people become ill it is the physician they put trust in for the care they need to survive...

Words: 2263 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Physician Assisted Suicide

...Affecting Physician-Assisted Suicide Thousands of people in the United States alone die every year from terminal illnesses. Medical technology is responsible for keeping many people alive; however some people are alive against their will. This paper recognizes the various events and people that are affected by physician-assisted suicide. While some terminally ill patients feel there is no reason for them to live and cause pain for not only themselves but also others, there are still people out there who disagree because they find that physician-assisted suicide degrades life. Since ancient times, many people have come up with the concept of a merciful and acceptable death. From the Greek and Roman times till today, physician-assisted suicide has been long debated throughout history (Boyd). However, individual choice in dying did not become a United States social and legal issue until recently. Jack Kevorkian, Dr. Death, is well known in history for being the first American doctor to perform physician-assisted suicide (“Jack Kevorkian Biography”). "Kevorkian created, "the suicide machine", a device that distributed first a muscle relaxer, then a drug that would stop the heart from beating" (Kastenbaum). Dr. Jack Kevorkian is perhaps the biggest advocate of assisted suicide after "he aired a videotape, on 60 Minutes, of him injecting Thomas Youk. He was charged with first degree murder, in 1998, for killing Thomas Youk, a victim of Lou Gehrig's disease" (Pickert). As a physician, Dr...

Words: 1688 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Physicians Assisted Suicide

...Physicians Assisted Suicide 1 Week Two Assignment PHI 103- Inforamal Logic Physicians Assisted Suicide 2 Most people want to live with dignity and die with dignity. People live their life the way they want to. They make important choices that can be very difficult sometimes and lead to dramatic changes. A person has a constitutional right to decide whether he wants to live or not. Some people become very ill or have devastating physical problems. Many of them trust their doctors to help them to cope with their illness and end their suffering. Physician-Assisted Suicide is an important topic that concerns people all over the United States. PAS is “the voluntary termination of one’s life by using means or information, such as a drug prescription or indication of the lethal dosage, provided by physician who is aware of how the patient intends to use such information or means”. Some people are against it because it goes against their religion and moral principals. Others are for it because it helps dying people to leave this world with dignity. Although opponent of PAS think that only God has the right to decide when a person has to die, others who are with it believe that a person has a right to end the suffering and pain by their own. One of the biggest benefits of PAS is that a person can stop their suffering and pain. There are ...

Words: 1071 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

A Survey of Physician-Assisted Suicide

...A Survey of Physician-Assisted Suicide English Composition I Abstract I recently became aware of the Oregon Death and Dignity Act; I found this to be an interesting idea.  It is not difficult to understand that the citizens may have varied and strong opinions about this subject, however the article I have chosen examines the physician opinion of medically assisted suicide, mainly the physicians without the legal option of medically-assisted suicide.         A Survey of Physician-Assisted Suicide With an aging population it is not only important to understand the attitude of the public in regards to physician assisted suicide, but also the attitudes of those charged with carrying out the task of euthanasia or assisted suicide.  First it is important to understand the term physician assited suicide refers to the medical professional providing the client with the means to commit suicide, meaning the physician provide medications or equipment to facilitate the end of the clients life.  This differs from euthanasia in that the physician is not actually ending the client’s life through lethal injection or other direct means. The article I chose to examine is a study of physician attitude towards assisted suicide and a study and the prevalence of this request by their clients.  The results are the compiled data of a survey sent to 3102 physicians, these physicians work in the fields most likely to receive a request for assisted suicide.   Methods and Analysis The survey involved...

Words: 752 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Physician Assisted Suicide Analysis

...fundamental human right and a legal option for anyone around the globe. One major benefit of physician-assisted suicide is that it ends suffering. According to "Doctor Assisted Suicide Pros and Cons List," as death nears, a lot of physical pain can occur from terminal...

Words: 1018 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Physician Assisted Suicide Controversy

...Physician assisted suicide is the voluntary termination of one's life who has been diagnosed with six months or less to live, carried out by the assistance of a physician. Compared to Euthanasia, assisted suicide is performed by the patient themself, where as Euthanasia is performed by the physician. Physician assisted suicide is much easier on the physician themselves for the reason that it puts complete control into the patient. It has been of some controversy over the years since its first legalization in 1997. Today there are five  states that have legalized physician assisted suicide which include, California (the most recent),Colorado, Oregon, Vermont, and Washington. The reason why this has not been a nation wide acceptance is due to...

Words: 911 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

State Health Laws on Physician Assisted Suicide

...American university | ME Ciera Clark NAtional American university | ME State Health Laws on Physician-Assisted Suicide State Health Laws on Physician-Assisted Suicide February 15, 2013 February 15, 2013 Table of Contents Introduction……………………………………………………………….2 About Euthanasia and Assisted suicide………………………………….2 Legalized euthanasia and assisted suicide……………………………….3 States considering bills to legalize physician-assisted suicide………….3-4 Death with Dignity Acts………………………………………………......4-5 Oppose Physician Assisted Suicide………………………………………5-6 Supporters…………………………………………………………………6-7 Reference…………………………………………………………………..7-8 Introduction For decades, the public, government, and physicians have been debating over the “Death with Dignity Act” or “Physician-Assisted Suicide.” It started back in the Ancient Greek and Rome time. The debate originated around the Hippocratic Oath and the condemnation of the practice. With the upsurge of Christianity, many physicians continued to condemn the practice. Within the last two centuries the public has spurned many discussions about Physician-assisted suicide and Euthanasia from many different historic perspectives (Procon.org, 2012). Although this debate has been lengthy and many of the issues discussed over the centuries are repetitive, new ideas and concerns do emerge with the current debate. What do you think when you here assisted suicide? Would you want your family member to suffer with an illness that has put them in so much...

Words: 2028 - Pages: 9

Free Essay

Physician Assisted Suicide

...Exploratory essay “Physician assisted suicide” Physician assisted suicide (PAS) is the voluntary termination of one's life by administration of a lethal substance with the direct or indirect assistance of a physician. It is legal in a few countries like the Netherlands. In the United States it is legal in only the state of Oregon. It is a very controversial topic with 3 different opinions groups. The group of people who are for it, those who are opposed to it and there is a third neutral group which is composed of medical associations. The first group is composed of the pro PAS .They argue that there are some patients who experience terrible suffering that can't be relieved by any other of the therapeutic techniques nursing has to offer, and some of those patients desperately seek deliverance. For pro PAS, PAS is not about doctors killing patients , but it is about patients whose pain cannot be relieved. Physicians who consider it merciful to help a patient to die by writing a prescription are not criminals. Supporters of PAS feel It is cruel to leave patients who need such help to find for themselves solutions to end their own lives, solutions that can be traumatic when human assistance can be available. The physicians have obligations, but when a cure is impossible and palliation has failed to achieve its objectives, there is always a remaining obligation to relieve suffering. If the physician has used all available...

Words: 935 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Physician Assisted Suicide

...Should Physician Assisted Suicide be Legal? xxxxxxxxxx PHI 103 Informal Logic xxxxxxxxx March Physician assisted suicide or euthanasia, is also known as mercy killing. Euthanasia is the act of putting to death painlessly or allowing to die, as by withholding extreme medical measures, a person or animal suffering from an incurable, especially a painful, disease or condition (www.dictionary.com). Physician assisted suicide is the act of killing or taking some one’s life. Many doctors and people feel that in certain situations it is the best thing to do in order to keep a person from pain and suffering. Who is to say that it is the best thing to do a close friend, family, the doctors, or the person that is sick? If the person that is sick is in a coma who is to make the decision? Who will say that the decision is right and was the right thing to do. Physician assisted suicide or euthanasia is taking life into your own hands, and playing God. The fact that physician assisted suicide or euthanasia is the killing of a person brings about the question should it be legal or illegal? The first time physician assisted suicide or euthanasia was used and first recorded in 1869 by a British moral historian named W.E.H. Lecky(McCartney, Donal 1994). Physician assisted suicide or euthanasia was also used by the Nazi’s. They used it to kill people that they felt did not deserve to live or did not meet their criteria of who should be living on earth. This use of physician assisted suicide...

Words: 1270 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Physician Assisted Suicide

...Physician-Assisted Suicide Physician-assisted suicide presents one of the greatest contemporary challenges to the medical profession's ethical responsibilities. Proposed as a means toward more humane care of the dying, assisted suicide threatens the very core of the medical profession's ethical integrity. Physician-assisted suicide occurs when a physician provides a patient with the medical means and/ or the medical knowledge to commit suicide ("Module 5: Physician-assisted,"). For example, the physician could provide sleeping pills and information about the lethal dose, while aware that the patient is contemplating suicide. In physician-assisted suicide, the patient performs the life-ending act, whereas in euthanasia, the physician administers the drug or other agent causing death. Although, the medical field has made great strides in improving end-of-life care through palliative and hospice programs, sometimes it’s just not enough. The care that is offered to the chronically ill and elderly is less than ideal and it is estimated that 40-70% of patients die in pain, another 50-60% die feeling short of breathe; 90% of nursing homes, where patients go to receive 24 hour nursing care, are gravely understaffed (Morrow, 2010). Debates Physician-assisted suicide is among the majority of debates in bioethical technology, in our time. Every reasonable person prefers that no patient ever contemplate suicide (with...

Words: 1219 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Physician Assisted Suicide

...Physician Assisted Suicide Donald Pecher SOC-120 Sharon Gerczyk 11/29/2010 Imagine being in a hospital room with an old, terminally ill man. Day in and day out his pain gets worse and worse. The nurses and doctors walk past as if they cannot hear his cries of pain and agony. This man calls upon a doctor for help. He asks the doctor to end his pain. The doctor feels sorry for him and decides to help him out. The very next day, the doctor is on trial for killing a man who begged out of pain to end it. It does not seem fair, does it? Well, believe it or not, the doctor has just committed a crime known as assisted suicide. Physician assisted suicide does not kill, it relieves. The patients no longer wish to suffer and they may really believe it is their time to go. If a doctor pulls the plug on someone or takes them off of their machines in order to die, it’s the same thing. Many people believe it is a money issue. Whatever the case, physician assisted suicide would give the patient the chance to choose and be in control of his or her life. What is Physician-Assisted Suicide? (In Physician-assisted suicide, the physician provides the necessary means or information on death. The patient performs the act. In Euthanasia, the physician performs the intervention. Euthanasia is defined as "the act of bringing about the death of a hopelessly ill and suffering person in a relatively quick and painless way for reasons of mercy". Suffering has always been a part...

Words: 2695 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

Physician Assisted Suicide

...Physician assisted suicide is wrong.is when the physician helps the patient take his or her own life due to the fact that the patient is suffering from a terminal illness. I am against physician assisted suicide because the role of a physician is to save a person’s life not taking it away, even if the patient requested it. This violates the fundamental principle of medicine and should not be practice. I feel that this should not be legal in the USA or in any other countries. Like I stated before, a physician’s job is to save lives, not the opposite. I understand that patients that are suffering from terminal illnesses may want to end their life because of pain they are suffering every day, but that is not the excuse to take away a person’s life. They have to think about their family; try to do anything to stay alive because there could be hope. Quantity of life is when an individual chose the live a longer life that may require various forms of science, such as machines and medication. This may lessen or slow down the effects of various illness and chronic conditions. Quality of life is when an individual chose to live without these “medicines and machines”. They live a free life from these various products but may live a shorter life. There are pros and cons for both of these choices, but if I were to choose, I would choose quantity of life. I want to be able to live longer. As a healthcare provider, I would respect and listen to my patient’s view even if its the opposite view...

Words: 278 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Physician-Assisted Suicide

...Physician-Assisted Suicide SOC 120 Professor Harrison 29 July 2013 Physician-Assisted Suicide Imagine a frail elderly woman laying in the nursing home in pain. This woman is 80 years old and has been diagnosed with terminal lung cancer and her heart cannot withstand treatment via radiation or chemotherapy. She has less than six months to live. Day in and day out you pass her room and hear her crying out from the immense pain. The pain medications are no longer working. She’s tired of fighting, tired of hurting, and tired of waiting to die. After consideration and discussions with her family she has decided to ask the doctor to help and end her life. The doctor feels remorse for the elderly lady and wants to help but cannot decide if it is the ethical thing to do because he knows that what he’s being asked to do is considered physician-assisted suicide. How is physician-assisted suicide any different than regular suicide? Does the fact that a person is terminally ill make it right? Who gets to decide if it is right? These are questions people may ask themselves when deciding whether or not they think physician-assisted suicide is ethical. Whether it is requested or not, many would say it is unethical for a physician to deliberately cause death to a person. Physicians take an oath to first do no harm. Others may say that a person has the right to make his or her own decisions about his or her life. In this paper, I will explore each side of physician-assisted...

Words: 2486 - Pages: 10