Free Essay

Politics Student

In:

Submitted By amallinson85
Words 2690
Pages 11
Was Germany any closer to being unified by 1849? The period from 1815-1849 is often described as “time period where nothing happened” in terms of unification, this can be seen with Germany remaining divided by 1849. However, throughout this period there was significant steps that both enhanced, and hindered how close Germany was to being unified, these include economic changes with the Prussian customs union, political changes within the congress of Vienna and social changes through the 1848-49 revolutions. There were significant economic changes throughout the period from 1815-1849, most importantly the creation of the Prussian customs union in 1818 that then went on to become the Zollverein in 1834. This was done after the Napoleonic war and the following peace brought fierce competition from British goods and the poor harvest of 186-17, it was intended to develop trade in the post war slump with neighbouring states by linking the German key rivers with the Rhine, Main and Danube. The states were also linked with the building off 2,800km of new road. “Prussia’s policy was deliberately aggressive and designed to enrich itself” this led to a trade war which Prussia soon won, and by 1834 rival trade zones joined with the customs union to create the single Zollverein. It can be argued that this brought Germany close to unification as it gave Prussia, the only nation capable of overcoming Austria’s opposition to unification economic power. The Zollverein also brought Germany closer to unification as it included every German state but Hannover, Oldenburg, Mecklenburg, Hanseatic towns and Austria were not members. Tis isolated Austria and was a factor in their gradual economic decline and eventual loss of power, this brought German closer to unification as it Austria who were the main opponents of unification, if their power was reduced and Prussia’s was increased then Germany was closer to unification. The Zollverein was made up of over 35 states and 25 million German people, this brought Germany closer to unification as the majority of the German states were linked together in an economic union along with measures and currency begging to become the same. The main thing that the Zollverein did to bring Germany closer to Germany is it provided a template for the ‘Klein- Deutschland’ without an Austria and allowed Prussia to appear the natural leader of Germany This was the first time Prussia began to defy Austria ‘it was the first break in German settlement of 1815’ and led to it being described as ‘the mighty lever of German unification” However, it could also be argued that the Zollverein did not bring Germany closer to unification but in fact prevented it as it can be argued that princes of the smaller states accepted this loss of sovereignty as they feared that if the growing industrial middle class were restricted by internal tariffs they would be angered and cause revolution and become a republic therefore by joining the Zollverein they were not encouraging unification, they were preventing it. It also highlighted the difference in political views between the nations as any state member could VETO a proposal at the Zollverein congress as some decisions were either held up or not made at all this evident in the Prussia v Austrian war in 1866, every member of the Zollverein opposed Prussia’s actions. The Zollverein did bring Germany closer to unification in an economic sense and set up the framework for a united Germany however the political differences were still evident and the princes were still desperate to keep hold of as much power as possible. There were also significant developments in the economies of German states concentrated in specific areas. The exploitation of Germany’s vast raw materials brought wealth for an emerging middle class the state which benefitted most was Prussia, which was granted control of industrial land on the River Rhine in 1815. There was also a significant rise in the urbanisation of the working class from the country side into the towns as people moved to work in the new industries, the population rose and people living in such close proximity meant there was potential for uprisings therefore bringing Germany closer to unification. The industrialisation took place throughout Germany, coal production increased from 1.2 million tonnes in 1815 to 6.1 millions of tonnes in 1848 along with woollen textiles went from 12.7 thousands of tonnes to 28.2 in the same amount of time. This industrialisation and economic growth along with the zollverein arguably brought Germany closer to unification as it increased the wealth and power of the middle class and took away power from the individual rulers, it also brought the working class in greater proximity to each other raising the chances of revolution, this view is supported by British economist JM Keynes who stated German unification was achieved through “coal and iron rather than blood and iron”
The economy was not the only factor that brought Germany closer to unification, there was also a significant amount of political changes throughout this period that brought Germany closer to unification such as the rise of nationalism and liberalism however there were also Significant changes that ensured Germany remained divided in particularly the actions of Austrian foreign minister Metternich. After the freedom from French occupation, the allied forces decided to dissolve the Confederation of the Rhine as they wanted to eradicate the memory of French Occupation, the German states now formed the German Confederation at the congress of Vienna, also known as the Bund or the ‘diet. ‘It aimed to protect its members and give them a stronger voice in Europe.

Each state sent one delegate to the diet however how many votes the delegate was worth was based on population, this allowed the bigger states such as Austria, Prussia and Bavaria to dominate as together they had 24/69 votes in parliament meaning they could VETO important decisions. At this point German unification did not look likely as Prussia, the only state that could realistically catalyse the unification of Germany, was happy to support Austria as they offered them the best chance of security. The Vienna settlement did not enhance the chance of unification as it failed to recognise the growing nationalist feelings amongst many middle class Germans mainly in universities where ‘political professors’ such as Dahlmann and Grimm could utilise their students into protest groups to stir up nationalist feelings. The growing nationalist feelings made Metternich determined to supress any semblance of nationalism as Austria was vulnerable to unrest from minorities inside its own frontiers. Consequently, the diet was used to suppress nationalism rather than embrace it. This is evident after the ‘Wartburg Festival’ which celebrated Martin Luther’s ‘ninety-five theses’ which was his defiance of the pope’s authority, a life sized model of Metternich was thrown onto a fire to show the hatred of him among nationalists. The result of this was Metternich looking for an excuse to pass legislation to repress nationalism, this came after the assassination on a Russian secret agent at the university of Jena which gave him is chance to pass the ‘karslbad decrees’ which aimed at cutting back political rights in Germany. These decrees did not brig Germany closer to unification as it aimed to stop the growing nationalism and liberalism a source, the decrees included strict press censorship a law commission in Mainz to monitor political activity. As a result of these decrees the foundations of nationalism were crushed. From then up to 1849 a few incidents of rising nationalism stand out. Nationalism did begin to rise however when France tried to retake land on the west bank of the River Rhine in 1840, this raised anger all over Germany and prompted composition of patriotic songs such as Deutschland uber alles (now the national anthem.) This suggested that nationalism did exist among Germans it just took a incident that would create a common goal for all Germans for it to have an impact
This brought Germany closer to unification as it showed there was underlying patriotism within Germany however It just needed a catalyst to stir up these feelings. However, by 1849, the Karlsbad decrees however took away the foundations for the growth of nationalism which did not bring Germany closer to unification as any rise was suppressed by Metternich.

There was also a significant rise in liberalism throughout this period, Liberalism brought Germany closer to unification as it wanted to gain freedom for the whole country and grant political freedom to the German people by removing the elites from power. This can be first seen in the south west where liberalism was at its strongest. In 1832 unrest around Europe spread to Germany and gave further support for a constitutional movement, Duke Karl of Brunswick was deposed and a constitution was granted, the same happened in Hanover, Saxony and Hesse Casse; between 1833-37. The most evident example of growing liberalism can be seen as the Hambach festival in 1832 which took place in the south west of Germany, 25,000 students gathered as speeches praising the constitutional movement, amidst the crowds there was revolutionary flag waving and called for a single united German Republic. This can be further seen in significant cultural changes throughout this period, Germany's different states began to realise that culturally, they were very similar. This led many to believe that the German people should be united politically. German Romanticism begin flourish artists and writers looked to the inner life of individual Others evoked the idea of a national spirit or "volk" was something that had existed in the past but been suppressed under Napoleon's rule. A culture emerged that encouraged people of the subjugated states to consider their identity and their roots this can be seen in paintings such as The wanderer above the sea of Fog, 1818 by Caspar David Friedrich This evidence of growing romanticism, nationalism and liberalism suggests that Germany was gradually moving closer to unification by 1849.

The consequences of this however arguably set the nationalist and liberalist movements in a much worse place than they were before 1830. Metternich passed the ‘6 articles’ via the Frankfurt diet in 1832 which banned all political movements, universities supervised and the wearing a black red and golf scarves was forbidden. This again shows the effect of Metternich and other elites on why Germany was not very close to unification by 1849 as none of them wanted to hand their power over to the people in a unified state. Without the 6 articles and Karlsbad decrees German unification would have been a lot closer by 1849.

The effect of Prussia on liberalism and nationalism remained very little until the death of King Fredrick William IIII in 1840, his son King William IV aspired to a liberal reputation and granted an end to censorship, release of political prisoners and appointed a liberal, united diet. This was a big step towards unification as the most economically powerful state had a liberal constitution, this would have brought Germany even closer to a unified nation, however King Fredrick was mentally unwell and abolished the united diet three weeks after its introduction and was quoted “never will I consent that a written paper should intrude between Lord our God in Heaven and this country. This suggests that the elites were never really serious about forming a united, liberal Germany as it would mean handing over more of their power therefore from a nationalist and liberalist point of view, unification was not very close by 1849.

The revolutions that’s occurred in 1848-9 however was the closest Germany had come to unification and Germany should have become united as a result. The revolutions were ignited from the overthrowing of King Louis in France, it called upon the rest of Europe to question authority. In Vienna, Metternich was forced to flee and the army was withdrawn from the capital. Metternich’s fall had a profound effect upon the rest of Germany, Landlords were attacked, castles and feudal records were destroyed. Rulers across Germany gave in early with very little fight, representative governments were set up, elections were held, liberal ministries were appointed and the old feudal order began to be abolished. In March 1848 at meeting in Heidelberg 51 representatives form 6 states and discussed changes to Germany’s political institutions and agreed to form the ‘Vorparlament’ where a constitution for the unification of Germany would be drawn up.

The national constitution hoped to agree on a new united constitution along with basic rights and demands including freedom of the press and fair taxes. It was at this stage that Germany was at its closest to unification than It had ever been, however by June 1849, the Frankfurt parliament had been moved to Stuggart then dispersed. This was down to a number of factors. The first problem was the people that had been elected into it, it was dominated by liberal minded, middle class professionals who were not used to political power, the parliament as also made up of moderate supporters of the monarchy along with radical republicans, there was also confusion over a Gross Deutschland (with Austria) or a Kleindutschland (without.) These conflicts in the parliament took time, during this time if gave the German princes time to recover and start asserting themselves against the liberals as they had military power behind them, the parliament did not. The ending of the parliament came from the refusal of Fredrick William IV to accept the crown of German emperor, he described it as a “a diadem moulded out of the dirt and dregs of revolution” . This suggests that Germany had not come any closer to unification then it had in 1815 as the elite rulers were still not accepting to unify the country however if the Frankfurt parliament would have been experienced, like minded individuals with popular support Germany would have been extremely close to unification in 1849.

The social structure of Germany throughout this period also effected two close it was to unification. The evidence suggests that the nation was split with the urban middle classes taking a very active political role whereas in the rural areas the mood towards unification was very apathetic, this was highlighted in the 1815 revolutions.

There was a big split between the social groups of Germany, as “once middle class liberals secured election of their own assemblies, most were as afraid as social revolution as the conservatives”
This suggests that because of the split in the social groups the upper classes would never be removed from power therefore unification would be less likely. The split within society was also down to working class apathy as all they wanted better wages and living conditions, unification did not bother them as a whole. This can be further seen in the Rural areas where after reasonably good harvest in the 1847-8 the rural population was not in a desperate economic way therefore had no need to call for revolution. This was crucial into why the revolutions and the attempt at unification failed. The social factors suggest that Germany was not close to being unified by 1849.

In conclusion, by 1849 Germany had certainly missed the opportunity to become unified after the 1848 revolutions however due to the failures of the Frankfurt parliament it allowed a restoration of the German confederation with the elites back in power and it appeared Germany was back to how it was in 1815, “the careful, steady process of the liberal’s constitutional movement was lost in the radicalism that followed” this suggests that the revolutions severely dented the nationalist movement meaning Germany was not any closer to being unified in 1849 than it had been in 1815.

--------------------------------------------
[ 1 ]. Tim Chapman. The congress of Vienna 1998.
[ 2 ]. WG shreeves, nation making in the 19th century 1984..
[ 3 ]. William The origins of the wars of German unification 1991.
[ 4 ]. William The origins of the wars of German unification 1991.
[ 5 ]. Tim Chapman. Congress of Vienna 1998.
[ 6 ]. Modern history review article sep 2000. Graham Goodlad.
[ 7 ]. The unification of Germany, Farmer and Stiles.
[ 8 ]. Tim Chapman. Congress of Vienna 1998

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Student Politics

...Student activism is work by students to cause political, environmental, economic, or social change. Although often focused on schools, curriculum, and educational funding, student groups have influenced greater political events. | There are conflicting views regarding students' participation in politics. It has been a very controversial subject. Two contrasting opinion is have been expressed by the two groups of people. There are people who always want to keep students very far from the politics. There are others who hold opposite view. They think that students ought to be well versed in politics because they are the future leaders of the country. There has been much discussion whether students should join politics or not. Some persons say that they should join and some say that they should not. We should first discuss the subject very reasonably. Then we can decide whether students should join politics or not: Before southern parts of Asia had been free from the bondage of the British rule, some politicians said that school students also should join the struggle for freedom. During the days of Non-co-operation movement, students were advised to give up studies and join the fight for freedom. Their argument was—"Everything is useless without freedom. Education can wait but freedom cannot. Everything will be set right as soon as we get freedom. If school students join the political movement, it will gain additional strength. Now, we have no longer to fight against the British...

Words: 3427 - Pages: 14

Premium Essay

Students and Politics

...One of the social maladies of India is the participation of the students in political activities. Their interest in politics has a deleterious effect on their academic career. May be, a student who engages himself in politics and is drawn to the charismatic political leaders will grow to be a politician and carve a niche for himself in the political arena. But generally a student’s participation in politics is not advisable, for, politics is a forbidden area to the young, immature student, whose unrestrained enthusiasm may land him in trouble if he follows in the footsteps of a misleading leader, whose policies and programmes may be sectarian and adverse to the nation’s weal. One important reason why a student is cautioned against straying into the political field is that his attention is diverted from his studies which should be his main concern. The purpose of education is defeated once he deviates from pursuing his educational career. He cannot devote his attention to politics and studies in equal measure, and if he does so, his mind is divided between two pursuits, and he is neither here nor there. This pitiable situation should be foreseen by a student before taking the step of taking part in politics whose turbulent current may take him away to unknown depths, may wash him off to some unknown corner, where caught up in a whirlpool, he may meet with his doom. This is the fate sought by him through his immaturity. The youth should again and again be warned that they should...

Words: 521 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Campus Violence

...violence is a worldwide burning and worrisomeissue. Political instability, student politics, psychological problem and mental instability of students are the most responsible factors to occur this incident frequently. Since globally campus violence is increasing in a concerning rate and general student s are the main sufferer of it, so we have to think about their future and solve this problem right away; otherwise a tremendous shock is waiting for us. And that is why we want to work on this topic. Campus Violence: A Haphazard condition in Educational Institutions What is Campus Violence? According to Oxford Dictionary violence means, “The behaviour involving or caused by physical force that is intended to hurt or kill somebody” and when the violence occurrs in educational campus, it is called CampusViolence. Violence is always prohibited and when it occurs in educational institutions, it is Obviously distressing and crucial fact. Worldwide educational institutions are faceing this problem frequently. It hampers the regular activities of the institutions. General students are the main victim and they suffer a lot from this vicious type of incident. Campus violence is actually a great quake for Educational sector. It hampers the natural flow of education and students suffer a lot from this sadistic types of activity.The causes of campus violence...

Words: 1052 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

World Politics

...Writing Assignments i n World Politics Courses Thomas 0. Schlesinger Walking out of Rounds Hall with me after class, Benny, a sophomore in one of my international relations courses, asked for, and received, some pointers on the required paper. “You’ve just told me to write exactly as I’ve been taught not to write,” said he. “And who, pray tell, taught you?” asked I. He gave an over-the-shouldernod across the street, toward Ellen Reed House--the English Department. "Hmmm. . . fine--I'mnot surprised to hear they tell you something different,” I told him. “The English profs teach you to write in a generic way, say, fiction, or generically expository stuff. I want you to write a social science paper.” With some ”Hmmm-ing” of his own, Benny shuffled off, wearing a mildly annoyed and not altogether convinced frown. How dare they teach different ways to write in different departments at the same college! Benny did make an effort to heed my suggestions, but it took persistence. For example, the introduction to his first draft, included a vague Writing Across the Curriculum, Vol. 11, August 1990 35 36 Writing Across The Curriculum (August 1990) statement like: ”Conflict between Arabs and Black Africans in the Sudan is a serious problem and should be examined in greater detail. . . including its history, causes, and future.” The purpose statement I eventually settled for read more like this: ”This paper will examine social, economic, and political aspects...

Words: 2635 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

Introduction to Political Science.

...Imparting value based education. 2. Preparing responsible and politically conscious citizens. 3. Building good leadership qualities and responsible future leaders. 4. Understanding the art of government and administration. 5. Motivating students to take competitive examinations. 6. Creating civic sense COURSE STRUCTURE I Semester Course Code POL 131 II Semester Course Code POL 231 III Semester Course Code POL 331 IV Semester Course Code POL 431 V Semester Course Code POL 531 POL 532 VI Semester Course Code POL 631 POL 632 Title Core Concepts of Political Science. Title Major Political Ideologies Title Indian Government and Politics- I Title Indian Government and Politics- II Title International Relations- I Principles of Public Administration Title International Relations- II Personnel and Financial Administration Hrs/ wk 5 Hrs/ wk 5 Hrs/ wk 5 Hrs/ wk 5 Hrs/ wk 4 4 Marks 100 Marks 100 Marks 100 Marks 100 Marks 100 100 Credits 4 Credits 4 Credits 4 Credits 4 Credits 3 3 Hrs/ wk 4 4 Marks 100 100 Credits 3 3 1 BA SEMESTER I POL 131: POLITICAL SCIENCE PAPER I – CORE CONCEPTS OF POLITICAL SCIENCE 75 Hrs This course deals with basic concepts of political science such as state, government, law, rights etc. Objectives To introduce the students to: • The...

Words: 3092 - Pages: 13

Free Essay

Syllabus

...POLITICAL SCIENCE/INTERNATIONAL STUDIES 360 Western European Politics Fall, 2015 Tuesdays and Thursdays, 2:30-3:45 pm Mundelein 620 Lake Shore Campus Dr. Vincent Mahler Coffey 327 (773) 508-3067 E-mail: vmahler@luc.edu Office Hours: TTH: 10:00-11:15 am, M: 5:30-6:45 pm, and by appointment This course begins with an introduction to the comparative politics of developed democracies, focusing on political culture and attitudes; interest groups and political parties; political institutions; and public policy. We will then go on to discuss a (lively) overview of contemporary Western Europe by longtime reporter and commentator T. R. Reid. Next, we will explore political institutions, processes, behavior and policy in three major Western European countries, the United Kingdom, France and Germany. Four times, spaced throughout the semester, I will offer brief factual comparisons of Western Europe and the United States in important areas, including public policy, the economy, education, social policy, and moral issues. If time permits, the course will conclude with a brief examination of the institutions and policies of the European Union, a regional organization linking twenty-eight European countries. In an effort to enliven our discussion, at the beginning of most classes I will introduce an unusual fact, song or comedy sketch that in some way deals with Western Europe, with a particular focus on the smaller European countries. READING ...

Words: 2059 - Pages: 9

Free Essay

Leadership

...CHAPTER 7 Power, Politics, and Leadership The purpose of this chapter is to provide readers with new insights into power and politics so that they can make better use of power and politics and thus lead others effectively. Chapter 8 is a continuation of this topic, but with a description of various influence tactics. CHAPTER OUTLINE AND LECTURE NOTES To function effectively, leaders must use power effectively, including applying political tactics to acquire and retain power. I. SOURCES AND TYPES OF POWER To exercise influence, a leader must have power, the potential or ability to influence decisions and control resources. A. Position Power A standard method of classifying power is based on whether the power stems from the organization or the individual. 1. Legitimate Power. Power granted by the organization is referred to as legitimate power. This power increases as one moves up the organization ladder. 2. Reward Power. The authority to give employees rewards for compliance is referred to as reward power. 3. Coercive Power. The power to punish for noncompliance is referred to as coercive power. It is based on fear. 4. Information Power. Having formal control over information that people need to do their work is referred to as information power. B. Personal Power Three sources of power stem from characteristics or behaviors of the power actor: expert power, referent power, and prestige power...

Words: 3646 - Pages: 15

Premium Essay

Wanieshazwanie

...| | |INTERNATIONAL ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY MALAYSIA | |COURSE OUTLINE | |Kulliyyah |Islamic Revealed Knowledge and Human Sciences | |Department |Political Science | |Programme |Bachelor of Human Sciences (Political Science) | |Course Title |Introduction to Political Science | |Course Code |PSCI 1010 | |Status |Core Course | |Level |1 ...

Words: 1248 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Nothing

...What i think is the bad influence of the old corrupted Politics practice made these University Students protesting the current emergency state of Bangladesh. I should request to the authorities to think about Banning the Student Politics in Bangladesh for next few years. The old fashion Student Politics Practice could be the main seed of facing the corrupted Politicians in future. There are 3 types of Student in any University or College: * A type: Career Oriented (focused only in study and career issues) * B type: Mid-type Student (they needs proper guidance about their career) * C type: Politics Oriented Students (who always prefer the Politics Involvement rather then Career) In usual scenario we loosed the fame and name of Dhaka University just for the reason of our Bad Political Practice which was practiced by the C Type students. And sometimes B type students were the ultimate victim of the Fight of C Type Students and Security Forces in different Protests. From my past experience B type students gets the influence or sometimes forced to support the C Type students. Which makes the ratio of protesting supporters increases than the usual ratio of C type students. Then the conflict seems more strong and bold to different media. Even the media influences in any activities needs to be monitored cause a Public focus is very much influencing for those C type students. Sometimes you will see only to show their face in medias for different protest or awareness...

Words: 429 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Is the Linkage Between News and Citizen Engagement Broken?

...Austin Prunty Discussion 4 Is the linkage between news and citizen engagement broken? Can the Internet fix it? Explain. Youth are indifferent to news and politics today. Most of today’s youth are swept into over stimulated digital environments and try to earn a career and a living just like their parents before them did but don’t focus on things that do not directly affect their life like the newspaper. I believe that youth are indifferent to news and politics unless they are influenced through peers and media, family upbringing or if they are concerned with social change. Youth that are aware of news and politics at an early age may take an interest in them as a career choice or a desire to make a difference in society. Author David T. Z. Mindich believes that, “the linkage between an informed citizenry and political and civic engagement has been broken in contemporary society” (p.351). He also says that our democracy will pay the price for this. I believe the main reason behind the problem of lack of engagement is “some feel that the education system has failed to produce appropriate levels of civic knowledge” (p. 352). This is true in schools everywhere because most teachers are not allowed to share their personal views on their political position to students and therefore neglect to inform their students of the vital information about how to make their own educated political position. So the linkage between news and citizen engagement is broken because it was never...

Words: 533 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

The Good Society

...! Topic 6- Building a good society! ! Introduction to Public Policy PPL1011! Every political party contesting the present parliamentary elections issues what is known as a 'manifesto' or 'electoral programme', in which it promises a number of policy initiatives that are intended to benefit different social groups, such as businesses, the elderly, university students and many others. These 'manifestos' remind us of the essential purpose of politics and public policy, which is to help create 'the Good Society'. 'The Good Society' means different things to different people, and its meaning changes from time to time. For example, when Prime Minister Cameron of the United Kingdom speaks of creating 'the Great Society', he has in mind a society in which people are empowered to make a success of their lives. Building 'the Good Society' requires much more than articulating an exciting vision of our collective future. It requires careful planning and decision-making, as well as effective implementation. ! ! ! The good society- a book the Swiss Family Robinson, Treasure island, Robison cruiso, political novels tell us what the idea/ good society would look like and it alerts us that it would be very difficult to realise and can be threatened by other societies.! Definition of a good society: a vision of a future society in which people enjoy; characteristics, civil and political rights, economic security and enjoy the benefits of justice, without distinctions based on age, gender...

Words: 1166 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Force Field Analysis

...What is force field Analysis? Force field analysis is a management technique developed by Kurt Lewin, a pioneer in the field of social sciences, for diagnosing situations. It will be useful when looking at the variables involved in planning and implementing a change program and will undoubtedly be of use in team building projects, when attempting to overcome resistance to change. Kurt Lewin assumes that in any situation there are both driving and restraining forces that influence any change that may occur. Driving Forces: Driving forces are those forces affecting a situation that are pushing in a particular direction; they tend to initiate a change and keep it going. In terms of improving productivity in a work group, pressure from a supervisor, incentive earnings, and competition may be examples of driving forces. Restraining Forces: Restraining forces are forces acting to restrain or decrease the driving forces. Apathy, hostility, and poor maintenance of equipment may be examples of restraining forces against increased production. Equilibrium is reached when the sum of the driving forces equals the sum of the restraining forces. In our example, equilibrium represents the present level of productivity, as shown below. Steps involved in Force Field Analysis Step-1 : Prepare the statement of the problem or issues under study (note : make sure that the statement is indicative and provide clear understanding and perspective regarding the cause variables). Step-2...

Words: 1652 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Political Science

...Gabriel Laurencin Jr Political Science Assignment VI April 17, 2015 The last three months of college have offered me opportunity to learn and understand the science that is involved in politics. Politics can be simplified into smaller components and an easier understanding by studying how it works and the systems of which they operate. This is what we call a social science. According to Britannica Encyclopedia Political science is a social science discipline that deals with systems of government and the analysis of political activity and political behavior. It deals extensively with the theory and practice of politics which is commonly thought of as the determining of the distribution of power and resources. When I started the political science class my views on politics were negative. Negative in the sense that I wanted little to do with politics. My view of politics was a form of corruption were citizens were robbed. My recent studies of the political science have changed my views, interest, and expectations of politics. Growing up in the Virgin Islands my generation has heard and seen very little positive talks about politics. My definition of politics before my political science class was fairly simple. I thought politics were a group or an entity of elected officials that controlled government money. I learned that I was not one 100% right but there was way more to that one simple word. The very first thing that political science made me understand is the importance...

Words: 1181 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Who Knows

...We are living in a time where the sketched epistemes of political rationality for which ‘life’ is the organizing object of politics (i.e., biopolitics) is being challenged. During the 1970s and beginning of 1980s theorists such as Foucault argued that the sovereign right to kill was increasingly displaced by the administrative compulsion to make live. That is, instead of ending violence or killing especially in the context of Europe and North America lethal conflict was redistributed through out the population turning politics into war by other means such as the withdrawal of the state from the household (i.e., oikos) and national life and hence with a more focus on biopolitics. In the Global South though theorists like Mbembe challenge Foucauldian biopolitics to argue that outside Europe and North America this governing of life (zoe) took a different form: necropolitics resulting from the histories of power relations such as slavery and colonization. Yet, theorists in the Global North such as Foucault insisted that the 1970s the life of power mutated increasing the neoliberal turn in government leaving our times and more concretely “the future as yet unthought.” This class begins with Foucault’s concept of biopolitics and Mbembe’s idea of necropolitics and asks: what are the stakes in thinking and practicing power today through the locus of biopolitics and/or necropolitics? What are the stakes in reading these tensions with respect to yesterday—and to tomorrow for the art...

Words: 580 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Hozongbojong

... Introduction There is no way to keep aside the glorious achievements of the student community in many of our national issues. The nation feels pride for their different attainments in socio-political debacles. The majestic Language Movement from 1948 to 1952, the Mass upsurge of 1969 and the Liberation War of 1971 are the bright achievements of our undaunted university student community. Despite so many successes of our students in national issues, the present day social environment preserves awful negative attitudes to the on-going activities of the students in the name of so called national politics. Mostly, they are found to get involved in uncalled for, but pitiful chaos originated from the rivalry of national political schools. As the consequence, a huge bulk number of general students and their guardians are dropped in manifold sufferings and uncertainties. Hence, the involvement of public university students in national politics is a highly trashed out issue at present time. In this research, we focus on university students’ (mainly public university students’) involvement in party politics and its influence on the educational environment. As most of the private universities are indifferent to politics, the spotlight is on public universities here. Statement of the problem Education of tertiary level helps a student to explore new horizons of knowledge and enter into the broader spectrum of philosophies of life. Hence...

Words: 565 - Pages: 3