Professional Development Plan
Cisco Carbajal
LDR/531
MArch 10, 2014
Arun Iyengar

Abstract
The title of this paper is professional development plan. The purpose of this paper is to develop a plan that will address the characteristics of the team members of the company. The company will review each individual assessment and characteristics. Reviewing the assessment we will develop a professional plan to address each individual's characteristics in order for them to perform well.

Professional Development Plan
During the first week everyone took a disc that assessment this assessment is tailored to behavioral style for each person. The assessment breaks down the individual’s predominant behavioral style. Within this assessment the different styles are dominance, interactive, steadiness and cautious. Within each style there are four sub styles that a further attempt to explain the results, so in total there are 16 different sub styles within this assessment. We will talk about each individual team member and their behavior style and what is the best professional development plan that would be silly for them.
Danny
The first remember that will be talking about is Danny. Danny has an interactive style which exhibit characteristics such as animation and intuitiveness. But interactive styles can also be viewed as manipulative and excitable ones playing behavior inappropriate to the situation. Many interactive styles have spontaneous actions and decisions, they do not like to be alone and attempt to dream and get others caught up in their dreams. They also intend to have good persuasive skills. Interactive style people seem to want to always get credit for the work that they have done. Inactive people tend to want to work in a quick pace environment for stimulation and excitement. To be able to control the behavioral adaptability for interactive styled people they need to control time and their emotions. They also need to view the Cubs chairman task hand and take a more logical approach. Nine so the characteristics of the inactive person there are many ways for you to have a personal development plan for that person. Another get to get the best out of this person you need to show them that you admire and like them. Be able to support their feelings when possible. Inactive people love it when a person interact and participate with them. Another type of development plan for a interactive person is to vary the routine, avoid having an interactive style person do long-term repetition. Another good method for an active people is to support their ideas, not to show them the negative side of their ideas but spin it to a positive side but still making it their idea. With these few interactions and positive feedback you would get a lot out of an interactive person.
Johnny, Sharika & Cisco
The following team members all scored in the same style. Johnny, Sharika and Cisco all have the same style; they all fall within the dominant style on the assessment test. Dominant people are very guarded and direct. Dominant people are very firm in their relationship with others; they are also oriented to productivity and getting to the bottom line. Dominant people take and accept challenges, to take authority and dive headfirst into solving the problem. The dominant style person is decisive with their actions and their decisions. They like to control and a dislike in action. They also seem to act cool, independent and have a competitive spirit. Dominant people like to get the job done quickly and impressively they do it alone, to have good administrative skills. They may also appear restless, critical, blunt and aggressive and sometimes come out pushy. Dominant style need to control the situation and themselves. Some of the behavioral adaptability dominant style needs more practice in active listening. They need to develop patience sensitivity and empathy. Sometimes it is good to make decisive actions and decisions but one of the adaptability behavioral's for a dominant person could also help to be more cautious. Even though they enjoy to work alone they need to identify with a group. Even though working with a dominant style person is and could be difficult there are many ways that it could be possible. One of them which are to be able to agree on ongoing boundaries didn't support them or get out of their way. Also allowed him to do their own thing but within the limits. A dominant person just like a interactive person also need compliments of the work that they have done. You should be able to let them take the lead when appropriate but also give them parameters.
The four different styles in the assessment test within the group 1 scored interactive the other three scored as a dominant style people. We have given you an overview of the different styles between dominance and interactive. As you can see there are much different from each other. Interactive likes to work with others as dominance like to work alone but they both need positive feedback about their work. Even though it is difficult to have two different styles working together it is very much possible and it is done every day. In every job there are many people with different styles; dominance, interactive, steadiness and cautious.
Conclusion
We have talked to you about the disc assessment that each group member took at the beginning of the course. At of the four group members three of him were dominant one alone was interactive. We talked about how in interactive person characteristics and what they like for themselves. We talked about how the company could help an inactive person achieve their goals and still get what they like as a person. We also talked about the predominant people and how they are characteristically what they like and what they dislike. We also came up with professional development plan for them in order for them that to their goals and still be happy within the work environment. Before starting this assignment we all thought it would be difficult to keep every individual happy within the workplace. But once you understand a person's personality with the disc assessment is very easy give them what they want and at the same time you get what you want. Which in the end it works out for both, the person either get to work alone or work with others as well get the job done on their own time with parameters included.