Premium Essay

Pt1420 Unit 2 Agression Analysis

Submitted By
Words 785
Pages 4
This means that the probability of missingness is not related neither to the recorded variables of the data nor the unobserved variable $Z$ itself. In other words, the behavior of $M_{Z}$ is statistically independent of all remaining variables of the data. For example, if the participants throw a coin to decide if they will answer a question or not, the missing item is MCAR.
The independence of $M_{Z}$ from the missing values $Z$ cannot be tested because we do not have access to the values which people refused to give answers.

The second type of Missing data is the mechanism Missing at Random (MAR). We assume that the sets $X$ and $Z$ and the indicator function $M_{Z}$ are the same as before. The MAR can be defined as
$$\mathbb{P}(M_{Z}=1|X,Z)=\mathbb{P}(M_{Z}=1|X).$$
To be more specific, the data are MAR if the missing values are related to the variables $X$ which have been recorded but it is independent from the variable which is missing from the data. …show more content…
For example, if we conduct a survey for the people's weight and we have missing values in the variable "weight", we may assume that the missingness comes from the overweight people who are ashamed to report their weight. However, we cannot be sure if this assumption is true or not. The MAR assumption will be correct if the people answer to questions like, "what is your height","how often do you work out". Such variables are highly correlated to the unknown variable and this will help us to reduce the dependence with the unobserved variable itself. (PaulD.Allison) We have to note that the MAR assumption is less restrictive than the MCAR

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Pt1420 Unit 2 Agression Analysis Database

...The total score for this section was 22. Using a cutoff of 14, which was the mean of the distribution, we categorized these scores into positive perceptions (14>) and negative perceptions (14≤). The overall scores for these two sections was an indicator of the knowledge levels as well as the associated perceptual attitudes. In the same way, a total score of the systematic and patient-related barriers to breast cancer screening was calculated. Using the same scale (0-2), the total of all items was 22 for the system-related barriers section and 34 for the patient-related barriers section. System-related barriers were classified into low score barrier (>9) and high score barrier (9≤), where 9 represents the mean for the calculated total system-related score. Personal barriers were classified into low score barrier ( ), intermediate score barrier ( ), and high score barrier ( ≤). Cronbach's Alpha for the reliability was 0.867, reflecting an excellent internal consistency of the designed questionnaire. The categorized groups were cross-tabulated using frequency tables and pie charts or bar charts with the socio-economic...

Words: 516 - Pages: 3