Premium Essay

Rdr Reduced Disclosure Regime

In:

Submitted By Elissa10Nagib
Words 800
Pages 4
Subject: Reduced Disclosure Regime (RDR)
The purpose of this memorandum is to respond to the company request about a new initiative of the Australian Accounting Standards Board (AASB) known as the Reduced Disclosure Regime (RDR). The following clarifies what RDR is, its purpose, who it applies to, how it fits within the Corporations Act and any adoption issues which could be considered.
In summary, the Reduced Disclosure Regime (RDR) has been created to allow for the preparation of less intricate and more useful general purpose financial reports for non-publicly accountable entities through the removal of unnecessary disclosures. It consists of two Australian Accounting Standards AASB 1053 Application of Tiers of Australian Accounting Standards and AASB 2010-2 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards. These standards indicate the framework for preparation of financial reports and disclosures which may be omitted. Although RDR is expected to be beneficial to preparation of financial reports there are adoption issues surrounding compliance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS).
RDR is a direction for reporting entities (not publicly accountable) to prepare general purpose financial reports that are less complex with exemptions of certain disclosures which are deemed unnecessary; without diminishing relevance and increasing the consistency and transparency of information. This is part of a movement to make reports more meaningful and useful to the user.
It may be applied for the financial year beginning 01 July 2013 and onwards, however there are instances where early adoption may be allowed from the 01 July 2009. (See Appendix 1 – RDRS for early adoption)
RDR is in effect as two Australian Accounting Standards:
1 – AASB 1053 Application of Tiers of Australian Accounting Standards
2 – AASB 2010-2 Amendments to Australian Accounting

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Is the Rdr the Future in Differential Reporting for for-Profit Entities?

...Is the RDR the future in differential reporting for for-profit entities? By Scott Sharp In March 2012, the External Reporting Board (XRB) proposed a number of changes to the New Zealand Accounting Framework, which enabled them to come to a decision in terms of differential reporting for for-profit entities. The XRB have chosen to align New Zealand with Australia and implement NZ IFRS Reduced Disclosure Regime (RDR). Is this the right decision moving forward in differential reporting? There is to be a four-tier structure with different reporting standards applying to each tier, however the bottom two tier are only transitional which will be removed according to legislative changes enforced. This allows us to focus on tier 2 for differential reporting which in order to qualify for the new RDR approach entities must be not publicly accountable or non-large public sector entities which elect to be in tier 2. Entities that are publicly accountable either trade in the capital markets and/or holds assets for a broad group of outsiders as one of its primary businesses. For a for-profit public sector entity to be considered “large” and thus placed in tier 1, it must have expenses exceeding $30 million. Under the current approach to differential reporting that was issued in 1994, entities must; not be publicly accountable, have all of its owners as member of the governing body at the end of the reporting period, and be not large. The criteria for “large” is a little different being that...

Words: 1121 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Nadeem72472

...Annual Report 2012 – 13 Published by Public Transport Victoria, 750 Collins Street, Docklands VIC 3008. ptv.vic.gov.au © Public Transport Victoria 2013 This publication is copyright. No part may be reproduced by any process except in accordance with the Provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. Authorised by Public Transport Victoria, 750 Collins Street, Docklands VIC 3008. ISSN 2202-8315 (Online) Print managed by Finsbury Green, Level 9, 124 Exhibition Street, Melbourne VIC 3000. This document is available in an accessible format at ptv.vic.gov.au. Printed on environmentally friendly paper. PTVH0291/13 Leading our public transport network – for all Victorians today and tomorrow. Contents Transmittal letter Abbreviations Chair and Chief Executive’s foreword 2 3 4 1 Structure and governance Organisational structure Public Transport Victoria Board Chief Finance Officer’s Statement 5 8 9 12 2 Highlights and Performance Report Highlights PTV Performance Report 15 16 22 3 4 Financial statements Appendices 31 99 1 Public Transport Victoria Annual Report 2012 – 13 2012 – 13 Annual Report transmittal letter 11 September 2013 The Hon. Terry Mulder MP Minister for Public Transport 121 Exhibition Street Melbourne VIC 3000 Dear Minister Annual Report 2012 – 13 In accordance with provisions of the Financial Management Act 1994, I am pleased to present the Public Transport Victoria Annual Report for the year ended 30 June 2013. Yours sincerely Ian Dobbs Chair and Chief Executive...

Words: 33918 - Pages: 136