Free Essay

Realism

In: Other Topics

Submitted By smitak15
Words 2666
Pages 11
What is the difference between Realism and Neorealism? Is the latter an advance on the former?

In the words of a leading critic of Realism, “there is no single tradition of political realism, but rather a knot of historically constituted tensions, contradictions and evasions. The realist thought embraces a view that international system is anarchic and states are principal actors driven by currency of power and competing self-interest. Many exponents and critics, describe Realism as tradition of thought, which signifies an approach to international relations, describing the world as it is, and not as it ought to be. In this essay, I will highlight differences between two strands of Realism dominant in the 20th century i.e., classical realism and neo-realism and also assess if neo-realism is an advance on realism.

While there are numerous denominations to the realist theory, there are no. of essential core elements which all Realists subscribe to. Prescribing to Hobbes view, all realists be it classical or neo-realist believe that international system is a state of nature where individual exist in an ungoverned environment, “without a common power to keep them all in awe”. Hobbes equates state of nature as state of war, which pits “every man, against every man”. To escape this intolerable condition, individuals agree to enter a civil society and install a sovereign power. Therefore, Realist theory operates in the assumption that domestically; the problem of order and security is solved because there is a central authority to look after the security needs of the individuals. However, international system, remains anarchic wherein each sovereign state acts independently, free from interference from or dependence upon other states. In a state of anarchy, states are responsible for their own security needs and nothing can impede the normal recurrence of war. Furthermore, for realists, states are the only actors that ‘count’ and it is the national interest that animates state behavior as they are essentially rational egoists, guided by the dictates of raison d’état . Finally, Realist’s maintain that the distribution of power or capabilities largely determines international outcomes.

In addition, classical realism and neo-realists differ distinctly in their conception of human nature and structure and power and conflict. Morgenthau, who is inspired from scholars like Machiavelli and Hobbes put forward six principles of political realism in his work Politics among Nations. Morgenthau’s first principle asserts “politics like society in general is governed by objective laws that have their roots in human nature”. Human nature, for Morgenthau is innately selfish with insatiable urge to dominate others. In contrast to this, waltz dismisses the role of human nature, and claims to establish ‘structural’ theory of international system, within which states co-exist rather than from any assumption about man.

Neo-realists like Waltz categorized Morgenthau’s realism as reductionist, and argue that international political structure can be understood only by systemic approach. For Waltz, domestic system is described as hierarchic and international system is anarchic which is characterized by logic of self-help in which survival and security are the immediate aims of a state. Waltz neo-realism breaks the connection between the internal and external dimensions of politics. Waltz argues that changes in the system has no serious effect on international politics as they occur all the time but changes of system is what matters most in contemporary times. Also, central to structural realism is the distribution of capabilities among states and it is these capabilities, which defines a state’s position within international system.

For realists and Neo-realists, the concept of power is at the heart of their analysis of international politics. For Morgenthau, “concept of interest is defined in terms of power”. “This concept provides the link between reason trying to understand international politics and the facts to be understood”. Morgenthau’s “will-to-power” sets politics as an autonomous sphere of social life distinguishing it from economics (the rational pursuit of wealth), religion, ethics or law. Consequently, morality and reason are mere instrument for justifying and attaining power. “Politics is struggle for power over men, and what ever its ultimate aim maybe, power is its immediate goal and the modes of acquiring, maintaining and demonstrating it determines the technique of political action”. Morgenthau’s idea of political autonomy is very important to understand, because it modifies his pluralistic view of human nature quiet radically. Because Politics is a realm of perpetual conflict and statesmen “think and act in terms of interest defined as power” characterizes the “limitless character of the lust for power” reveals a general quality of human kind. For Morgenthau, ‘lust for power’ is to gain ‘relative’ advantage over other human beings. This presumes that the fundamental objective of the state is to maximize its own power, so that it is better suited to influence the actions of others and is therefore better able to bring about outcomes that are to its advantage. Thus for realists, power, as an end in itself, is the basic determinant of state behaviour.
Waltz offers a considerably thinner definition of power than Morgenthau. He shifts the focus from power to capabilities. He suggests that capabilities can be ranked according to their strength in the following areas: “size of population and territory, resource endowment, economic capability, military strength, political stability and competence”. Waltz limits his definition to mainly tangible variables, as they are much easier to quantify. Waltz argues, that self-preservation of states is most important and in achieving this states maximizes power i.e., power is a means to an end and not an end in itself. There are thus vast differences between Morgenthau and Waltz in their definition of power. Waltz is highly critical of Morgenthau’s definition of power and argues that human nature which is constant cannot explain variations and the recurrence of patterns in international politics.

Both strands of Realism agree on the importance of balance of power, though for different reasons. For classical realists such as Morgenthau, balance of power was a “necessary outgrowth of power politics”. The balance of power for Morgenthau was a “universal concept” used to refer to a situation of equilibrium as well as to any situation in which power struggle takes place. As I.L Claude points out, Morgenthau uses this phrase in a very loose manner and its universality is what led him to use the term so broadly so as to led him to inconsistency. In contrast, to cut through all the ambiguities and contradictions levelled against Morgenthau; Waltz laying emphasis on the ‘anarchic structure’ of international politics outlined his theory of balance of power. On assumption that “ states are unitary actors who, at a minimum, seek their own preservation and at a maximum, drive for universal domination,” Waltz deduces that balances of power must necessarily emerge. In self-help system, providing for one’s own security can, often increase the sense of insecurity in other states. Thus military arrangements of one state, whether for offensive or defensive purpose are likely to be emulated by other states, thereby creating unresolvable uncertainty in the minds of other states. In a self -help system, neo-realists argue that the balance of power will emerge even in the absence of a conscious policy to maintain the balance. Waltz, bipolarity is the most stable system of distribution of power because there are fewer interested parties involved. “A fortuitous balance will be established through interactions of states in the same way that an equilibrium is established between firms and consumer in the market. In other words, the balance of power is not natural or inevitable, it must be constructed”.
Waltz’s Theory of International Politics was conceptualised with a desire to adopt a more methodologically rigorous approach to international relations, embracing scientific concepts and reasoning. Thus in the next section of my essay, I will briefly try to assess roots of international conflict and highlight if neo-realism advances or weakens classical realism.
Waltz attempts to locate cause of international conflict at the systemic level. He claims that the anarchical nature of the international system causes major power to pursue their own interest. If and when the major powers do act in accordance with international law, this is because major powers were generally involved in the very creation of that law and consequently stands to benefit from it. For instance, international institutions are created by the more powerful states and survive as long as it serves major interest of their creator. The USA after 1945 established Bretton Woods system, which set framework for international economic relations. The USA was driven by self-interest; it had more to gain from managing the international system than to lose by refusing to exercise leadership. But when US found out it no longer served its interests, the Nixon shocks of 1971 were administered without consulting other members.
Critics of structural realism argue that states involvement in international institutions depreciates the importance of institutions thereby invalidating realist theory. Waltz argues that strange case of survival and expansion of NATO after cold war era illustrates not the defect but limitations of structural explanations. In defense of this theory he claims that survival of NATO has subordinated international institutions to national purpose of states that create and maintain them. In contrast, Structural realism was unable to explain the 2003 invasion of Iraq, which can be used as an example of the anarchic system causing powerful states to violate international law to suit their needs. The Neo-Realists do not explain variety of factors, suchas the need to invade, and the subsequent war. Realists often have been outspoken critic of the war and argued that Iraq could have been deterred from threatening the security of US and its allies in the Middle East.
Classical realism goes much further in analyzing such an event than structural realism, as it takes a wider range of factors into consideration. Morgenthau recognized the importance of ideology and nationalism, which are key themes of the rhetoric of the ‘war on terror’. Thus without considering a wider range of factors than structural realism will allow, it is impossible to fully understand motivations for war.

Waltzian structuralism accounts for ‘continuity’ in international affairs which maybe a key point of criticism by other scholars. Robert Keohane, a liberal theorist accepts basic tenets of the neo-realist argument such as, the assumption that states act rationally, and the states seek power to affect other states. And yet argues that the concepts of “maximizing power” and creating a “balance of power” are in fact contradictory. He points out that “states concerned with self preservation do not seek to maximize their power when they are not in danger”. Keohane argues “realism is particularly weak in accounting for change, especially where the sources of that change lie in the international system or in the domestic structure of states”. J. G. Ruggie embeds his criticism of Waltz by declaring that “Theory of International Politics is one of the most important contribution to IR”. Yet he argues that Waltz has not only ignored changes in the density of interactions in systems, but has been too quick in assuming that the differentiation in units can be dropped as a characteristic of the structure of the international system. In the short term, states may be the dominant units and play a similar functional role, but over long periods other units may grow in importance, and roles may alter. Ruggie points to evolution of concept of sovereignty at the end of the feudal era to illustrate such generative changes, and argues that Waltz’s theory is too static to explain such changes.
Despite many disparities and contradictions with its predecessor, it can be concluded that neorealism improves on classical realism to different degrees. It profoundly rejects human nature as a premise for international conflict and offers a more scientific and objective rendering of its subject matters while not being insensitive to scrutiny. Although neorealism is helpful in analyzing state’s behavior towards other institutions, it has been unsuccessful to explain major events in the course of complex and changing national interests. Consequently, opposed to neorealism, neo-classical realism has been gaining ascendancy, which brings back structures and unit level factors into the theory. In the era of globalization, unless neorealist shift their focus away from ‘structures’, the theory as a whole would be rendered invalid

Bibliography

1. Robert O. Keohane, Neorealism and Its Critics, Columbia University Press, 1986 2. Baylis & Smith, The Globalization of World Politics, 4thed,Oxford University Press, 2008 3. Baylis & Smith, The Globalization of World Politics, 2nded,Oxford University Press, 2001 4. Kenneth N Waltz, Structural Realism after Cold War, 2000 5. Martin Griffiths, Realism, Idealism & International Politics, Routledge, 1992 6. Devetak, Burke & George, An Introduction to International Relations, 2nded, Cambridge, 2012 7. Karen Mingst, Essentials of International Relations,3rded, W Norton &Co. 2004 8. C. Brown with K. Ainley, Understanding International relations, 3rded, Palgrave, London 9. Jackson and Sorenson, Introduction to International Relations, Oxford University Press, 2007 10. Kenneth N Waltz, Theory of International Politics, pp65+74, New York; London: McGraw Hill, 1979 11. Hans Morgenthau, revised Kenneth W Thompson, Politics Among Nations, 1967 12. Thomas Hobbes, Leviathan, Chp 13

--------------------------------------------
[ 1 ]. Baylis & Smith, The Globalization of World Politics, 2nded, pp. 147, Oxford University Press, 2001
[ 2 ]. Devetak, Burke & George, An Introduction to International Relations, 2nded, pp36, Cambridge, 2012
[ 3 ]. Baylis & Smith, The Globalization of World Politics, 2nded, pp. 150, Oxford University Press, 2001
[ 4 ]. Thomas Hobbes, Leviathan, chpt 13, pp89
[ 5 ]. Baylis & Smith, The Globalization of World Politics, 2nded, pp. 150, Oxford University Press, 2001
[ 6 ]. Karen Mingst, Essentials of International Relations,3rded, pp60, WW Norton &Co. 2004
[ 7 ]. Devetak, Burke & George, An Introduction to International Relations, 2nded, pp 39, Cambridge, 2012
[ 8 ]. Baylis & Smith, The Globalization of World Politics, 2nded, pp. 151, Oxford University Press, 2001
[ 9 ]. C. Brown with K. Ainley, Understanding International relations, 3rded, pp30, Palgrave, London
[ 10 ]. Hans Morgenthau, revised Kenneth W Thompson, Politics Among Nations, chp1,pp 4, 1967
[ 11 ]. Martin Griffiths, Realism, Idealism & International Politics, pp38+ 77, Routledge, 1992
[ 12 ]. C. Brown with K. Ainley, Understanding International relations, 3rded, p 41, Palgrave, London
[ 13 ]. Devetak, Burke & George, An Introduction to International Relations, 2nded, pp41, Cambridge, 2012
[ 14 ]. Kenneth N Waltz, Structural Realism after Cold War, pp5,2000
[ 15 ]. Robert O. Keohane, Neorealism and Its Critics, pp15, Columbia University Press, 1986
[ 16 ]. Martin Griffiths, Realism, Idealism & International Politics, pp39, Routledge,1992
[ 17 ]. Hans Morgenthau, revised Kenneth W Thompson, Politics Among Nations, chp1,pp 5, 1967
[ 18 ]. Martin Griffiths, Realism, Idealism & International Politics, pp40+41, Routledge, 1992
[ 19 ]. Jackson and Sorenson, Introduction to International Relations, pp70, Oxford University Press, 2007
[ 20 ]. Martin Griffiths, Realism, Idealism & International Politics, pp43, Routledge, 1992
[ 21 ]. Baylis & Smith, The Globalization of World Politics, 2nded, pp. 151, Oxford University Press, 2001
[ 22 ]. Kenneth N Waltz, Theory of International Politics, pp65+74, New york; London: McGraw Hill, 1979
[ 23 ]. Baylis & Smith, The Globalization of World Politics, 2nded, pp. 185, Oxford University Press, 2001
[ 24 ]. Robert O. Keohane, Neorealism and Its Critics, pp13, Columbia University Press, 1986
[ 25 ]. Martin Griffiths, Realism, Idealism & International Politics, pp83, Routledge, 1992
[ 26 ]. Robert O. Keohane, Neorealism and Its Critics, pp15, Columbia University Press, 1986
[ 27 ]. Baylis & Smith, The Globalization of World Politics, 2nded, pp. 153, Oxford University Press, 2001
[ 28 ]. Kenneth N Waltz, Structural Realism after Cold War, pp6, 2000
[ 29 ]. Baylis & Smith, The Globalization of World Politics, 2nded, pp. 153, Oxford University Press, 2001
[ 30 ]. Kenneth N Waltz, Structural Realism after Cold War, pp18, 24,26, 2000
[ 31 ]. Baylis & Smith, The Globalization of World Politics, 2nded, pp151, Oxford University Press, 2001
[ 32 ]. Kenneth N Waltz, Structural Realism after Cold War, p 2618 20,24,2000
[ 33 ]. Baylis & Smith, The Globalization of World Politics, 4thed, pp104, Oxford University Press, 2008
[ 34 ]. Martin Griffiths, Realism, Idealism & International Politics, pp48 Routledge, 199
[ 35 ]. Robert O. Keohane, Neorealism and Its Critics, pp17+18, Columbia University Press, 1986
[ 36 ]. Baylis & Smith, The Globalization of World Politics, 4th ed, pp. 99, Oxford University Press, 2008

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Theatrical Realism

...Theatrical Realism Theatrical Realism is the attempt of playwrights to mirror reality on the stage. That is to say, these playwrights intend for the audience to see themselves on the stage without fanfare – a stripped-down form of theatrical arts. Realistic theatre does not possess the magical elements of theatre that preceded it, but this is the strength of realism. Anton Chekhov echoes this point, “I wanted to tell people honestly: ‘Look at yourselves. See how badly you live and how tiresome you are.’ The main thing is that people should understand this. When they do, they will surely create a new and better life for themselves”. Realistic playwrights stood on the shoulders of the giants of theatre who preceded them by continuing to look at their times and people, but shattered new earth by asking audiences to look in to themselves. Realism is theatre in which people move and talk in a similar manner to that of our everyday behavior. The style has been dominant for the last 120 years. It holds the idea of the stage as an environment, and not just an acting platform. Some of the ideas flourishing in realism’s formative years were Charles Darwin’s Origin of Species and Karl Marx’s Communist Manifesto. Both of these works profoundly impacted the intelligentsia. They called into question the foundations on which the people of the world had built their truths. Marx, especially, can be seen as an important figure of the realistic movement as he sought to awaken the working...

Words: 1715 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Realism & Romanticism

...Running Head: ROMANTICISM AND REALISM Romanticism and Realism Western Governor’s University RWT Task 1 February 17, 2013 Romanticism and Realism 1. Romanticism was a period starting as early as the 1760s seen not only in the world of art but also in the literary and musical worlds as well. The movement originated during the French Revolution as a contention to the Enlightenment period that centered on science and logic. The movement ranged from widespread Europe to the United States. During this period of time the Industrial Revolution was beginning and people lived in uprising cities with deplorable conditions of terrible sanitation and poor health. Focusing on Romanticism in the realm of art, the initial paintings consisted of landscapes. The need for open space was a reaction to the closeness of people living together in the city. It was very common to find turmoil and storms taking over the canvas. A great summary of the origins Romanticism can be quoted from The Metropolitan Museum of Art as “In Romantic art, nature—with it’s uncontrollable power, unpredictability, and potential for cataclysmic extremes— offered an alternative to the ordered world of Enlightenment thought.” (Galitz, 2000) Artists of this time period would paint pictures that caused the viewers to feel emotion. There were no distinguished characteristics of how a painting was created. Creations during the art period were original from the artists themselves and had no set technical rules...

Words: 788 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Classical Realism

...I-Introduction: The term "realism" was first used to formulate the philosophical doctrine that "universals exist outside of the mind" (Freyberg-Inan, 1). Yet, in political theory, "realism" represents a school of thought that analyzes the political process as it is or as it is disclosed by historical forces " ... that the able political practitioner takes into account ... and incorporates ... into his political conceptions and his political acts "(Ibid, 1-2). In the field of international relations, realism became the dominant analytical paradigm mostly after the start of the Second World War, when it displaced idealist doctrines, promising "to provide more accurate information, more powerful, and more relevant answers" to the roots or causes of peace and war (Brecher& Harvey, 54). At the same time, many features of the current realist paradigm can be traced back to the time of Thucydides, Niccolo Machiavelli and Thomas Hobbes. Among contemporary thinkers recognized as major writers and contributors to the realist tradition are Hans Morgenthau, Edward Carr and Kenneth Waltz (Freyberg-Inan, 8). What are then the basic tenets or common features of a realist thinker? Machiavelli would acknowledge that to be a realist one has to look at history as "a sequence of cause and effect whose course can be analysed and understood by intellectual effort, but not directed by imagination" (Carr, 64). Hobbes would persist in the same train of thought and insist that to be a realist thinker...

Words: 17639 - Pages: 71

Premium Essay

Magical Realism

...Magical Realism Granville Scott Nelson Embry Riddle Aeronautical University Abstract Magical realism is a Latin American genre in which the author takes an ordinary storyline and inserts an unnatural character or sense of being. This paper will show the difference between magical realism and fantasy or science fiction. Magical Realism From my reading I now understand that magical realism is adding an unrealistic feature or character to an otherwise ordinary story. Magic realism is a term used to describe a mingling of the mundane with the fantastic. “Magical realism is not speculative and does not conduct thought experiments. Instead, it tells its stories from the perspective of people who live in our world and experience a different reality from the one we call objective.” (Rogers, 2002) If an author is telling a familiar story and he adds a twist such as a winged horse or an individual who has been alive for two hundred years, that is an example of magical realism. The difference in magical realism and fantasy is that the story is very natural and true with a surreal object and fantasy is just that, fantasy. The term is best described by Baker in her 1997 writing: While realism itself is a chronically unstable term, realist writing is usually understood to be that which draws on a set of narrative conventions designed to create the illusion that the story on the page is real or true and corresponds in some direct way to the ordinary world of day-to-day life...

Words: 922 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Realism

...Professor White PAR 101 December 7, 2015 A Moral Realism Believer Ayer claims that any talk about right and wrong, good and bad, is just a matter of “emoting” or expressing one’s feelings while a moral realist would think the total opposite. A moral realist believes that all moral questions are real questions and every answer to those questions can be either true or false. Ayer is labeled as an anti-moral realist due to his fervent claims to his belief. Regardless of anyone’s feelings or emotions, I believe that there is always a reason why the answer should be true and a reason for why the answer should be false. Ayer’s view on moral claim is incorrect because a moral claim is one that attempts to define what is right or wrong. Anti-moral realists believe that emotivism is more influential and moral realists believe that there should be a legit reason behind every answer. The debate between moral realists and anti-realists assumes a variety of claims can be recognized as moral claims. In my opinion, moral realists have common sense. With that advantage, there are a number of powerful arguments on why moral realism is the right way to go which include: the knowledge of a moral realist, the realism/antirealism debate, moral cognitivism and descriptivism, and the truth in moral judgements. “A moral realist believes that there is at least one moral fact, and moral facts are not reducible to non-moral facts. Moral statements are true or false, and at least one moral statement...

Words: 1304 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Literary Realism

...I believe The Death of Ivan Llyich best illustrates realism in literature. Realism goes towards depictions of contemporary life and society "as they were." The story makes reality as real as possible and in comprehensive detail. One aspect of realism is that the character is more important than action and plot where complex choices are often the subject. Ivan Llyich is most definitely the most important person in the entire story, without him, the story would not be a story. Another aspect of realism is that the characters in the story appear in their real temperament and motive. Throughout the story, we are able to see Ivan’s real personality and how he thinks in life. He is more or less a grumpy old man who is very materialistic. The characters in realism tend to be in relation to each other, to their social class, or to their own past. All of these are true for The Death of Ivan Llyich. We are able to see how Ivan acts with other people, especially his family and how his past has not been a good one, which he realizes before his death. Also, in realism, class is an important thing. Ivan was very materialistic and cared a lot for his money. Being a judge, he was obviously well off and could be as materialistic as he wanted. A major aspect of realism was that authors kept their personalities and voices in the background. This is also true in The Death of Ivan Llyich. The Death of Ivan Llyich is by far the best example of a literary...

Words: 267 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Arguments Against Realism

...Mearsheimer, the founder of offensive realism would agree with this argument, suggesting that states should not place themselves in high risk situations that could possibly hurt the order of the world system. A realist would argue that urging Australia and New Zealand to give up their sovereign lands to refugees is completely implausible, especially since the two states are not involved in any crimes against their own citizens. Since the two Oceanic states are far stronger than Kiribati, it would be entirely unwise to side with the latter. In the case of the CAR, a realist would again hesitate to intervene due to the complexity of the situation and its low chance of being resolved. Intervening into the affairs of a sovereign state has remained controversial as seen in Somalia, Kosovo...

Words: 643 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Realism Art

...Realism is a 20th century art movement which took a diverse approach to representing the figure, yet has being ongoing from around the 18th century. It depicted what was happening in a contemporary way, an attempt to define what was real with no bias or personal preference from the artist. Only portraying what they saw. The movement originated in france in the 1850’s after the 1848 revolution. These Realists positioned themselves against Romanticism, a genre dominating French literature and artwork in the late 18th and early 19th centuries. Seeking to be undistorted by personal bias, Realism believed in the ideology of objective reality and revolted against the exaggerated emotionalism of the Romantic movement. Truth and accuracy became the goals of many Realists. Many paintings depicted people at work, underscoring the changes wrought by the Industrial and Commercial Revolutions. The popularity of such 'realistic' works grew with the introduction of photography, a new visual source that created a desire for people to produce representations which look “objectively real.” Thereafter this new approach to representing the figure grew and new forms such as American realism and social realism where introduced to the art world. Therefore in view of this i will be looking at the American realist Edward Hopper and the realist painter Lucian Freud. Both these artists where at the forefront of modern art and both took different approaches to representing...

Words: 1204 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Realism Symbolism Art History

...Suitable Realism Although realist artists attempt to convey a candid image of modern life, their tendencies to render a more relatable and aesthetically pleasing result exceeds their objective realities. In both Huysmans’ Against Nature and James’ The Real Thing, the protagonists seek a more evocative reality; one that transcends the boundaries of the objective and replaces the idea of what is natural with the more arousing powers of imagination. In James’ short story, using the real thing, defined by the true nature of Major and Mrs. Monarch, becomes irrelevant to his depiction as the figures rendered by the artist appear as uninhabited forms and in no way suggest the reality of their social stature. Instead, what in person appears artificial and inauthentic, two separate beings insignificant to the social realities of superiority in the eighteenth-century, embrace the dignified postures and mannerisms of high society to a higher degree than the Monarchs who in fact are the real thing. In Against Nature, Huysmans’ Des Esseintes escapes 19th century bourgeoisie society in a manufactured sanctuary, void of anything real or absolute. What is real outside of his retreat has no value, but his own reverie, contrived and artificial, creates a deeper and more emotional beauty. The characters of Charles Dickens, the women of Gustave Moreau, the artificial flowers, “fashioned by the hands of true artists,” encapsulate the essence of his imaginary reality. Transcending into Realist art...

Words: 1639 - Pages: 7

Free Essay

Magical Realism

...The True Essence of Magical Realism Amy Beals (14963137) ITT Technical Institute The True Essence of Magical Realism What comes to mind when you hear the word magic or magical? The average person typically thinks of witchcraft, spells, voodoo, and even disappearing bunny rabbits. The word realism, in the everyday use, is a word we are very familiar with. Join magical and realism together and they take on a whole new meaning. The marriage of these two words transforms their very individual definitions into one unique meaning. Magical realism has since developed into a literary genre; it represents more than just a definition. Magical realism has, in essence, become a philosophy, a real way of seeing things. It also represents much more than an attitude, or a window to view the world; it has become a philosophy of life. The very wording itself is an oxymoron (Rodgers, 2002). According to many critics, Magical Realism was thought to have originated, as a new art form, in the early twentieth century. Having been given credit for coining the term, Franz Roh, writes about this new art form in one of his articles. The 1925 article “Magical Realism,” Mr. Roh explains Magical Realism through the examination of artistic styles. He further explained that an artist may review the texture, the light, and the shape of an object to influence the portrayal of what is simply a caricature of reality; there isn’t any significant meaning other than the obvious real qualities of what is being...

Words: 1279 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Magic Realism

...What is Magic Realism? * Magical elements blend with the real world. * Taps into emotional reservoirs within all of us * Developed as an art movement in the years after World War I * A type of realism using contemporary subjects, often in cool detachment and sometimes injecting an eerie atmosphere * Explains these magical elements as real occurrences, presented in a straightforward manner that places the "real" and the "fantastic" in the same stream of thought * Happens when a highly detailed, realistic setting is invaded by something too strange to believe * ubiquitous term to describe various contemporary works, yet a certain ambiguity surrounds it * Aims to seize the paradox of the union of opposites * Differs from pure fantasy primarily because it is set in a normal, modern world with authentic descriptions of humans and society * First introduced by Franz Roh, a German art critic, who considered magical realism an art category. Magic Realism in Literature and Art * A kind of modern fiction in which fabulous and fantastical events are included in a narrative that otherwise maintains the 'reliable' tone of objective realistic report, designating a tendency of the modern novel to reach beyond the confines of realism and draw upon the energies of fable, folk tale, and myth while maintaining a strong contemporary social relevance * When a character in the story continues to be alive beyond the normal length of life and this...

Words: 770 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Arguments Against Realism

...Realism refers to the notion that the world`s affairs and politics are driven and control by competitive self-interest. Therefore, in connection with human right perspective a realist person would suggest that the state agents should use force on any person suspected to be a threat to the nation. For example, they recommended that suspect should be interrogated in secret using special facilities such as Guantanamo Bay detainment facility or be terminated on sight. Liberalism refers to the situation where people or countries have the ability to find mutual relationship and interests and can work together to achieve them (COLE, 167). A liberalist perspective on issues of human right is that suspects have a right to fair and free legal processes. The civil right movement were successfully in airing Ahmed Mohamed story. This is the young boy from Irying a Texas high school who wanted to show his teacher a homemade clock he made. He ended up...

Words: 1171 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Reinhold Niebuhr Christian Realism Analysis

...Reinhold Niebuhr’s Christian Realism has many components to it. Post World War I, he moved away from his usual liberal/pacifist way of thinking after seeing that the war was based on power control and economical concerns, and this was something he did not want to support. He wanted to follow a more proactive way of doing things instead of just waiting for something to happen. Liberal’s pacifist way of thinking utilizing non-intervention ways to deal with evil in the world, could not be used anymore. “He argued that a chief reliance on the power of reason through education and moral suasion was naive and misplaced” (citation I). By doing nothing would allow evil to continue to control everything. Niebuhr also says humans in this world are self-glorifying, sinful in nature, and will never be equal to...

Words: 404 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Realism in Ibsen’s a Doll’s House and Churchill’s Top Girls

...Realism in Ibsen’s A Doll’s House and Churchill’s Top Girls Nineteen-century Europe held rigid conventionalisms of class division, social order and gender roles. Society hid behind the mask of hypocrisy in an attempt to preserve bourgeoisie’s position of power. In that concern, conceptions of ‘liberty of the spirit’[1] and ‘liberty of thought and of the human condition’[2] came to question. Thus, Henrik Ibsen drew attention to the threat to ideas of freedom and public opinion by giving life to A Doll’s House (1879). He aimed to critique constraints of Victorian society rather than vindicating the rights of women. In that sense, in a speech given in his honour by the Norwegian Women’s Rights League on 26 May 1898 he stresses: ‘Whatever I have written has been without any conscious thought of making propaganda. […] To me it has seemed a problem of humanity in general.’[3] Ibsen clearly states he strove to expose the manipulation of individuals’ liberties as he worked for the human cause. In Caryl Churchill’s Top Girls (1982) the aim of the play is to reveal how the fulfilment of women’s self-realization needs in the personal and social spheres is achieved by compromising humanity and morality. In the end, what ‘The New Woman’ gets is disillusionment and loneliness as she finds herself in a predicament: mother or career woman, sensitive or hardened. In Top Girls what is represented is the price women pay to go up the corporate ladder in a male-dominant world. Thus, I will...

Words: 2225 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Bless Me Ultima Magical Realism

...Magical realism is a serious fiction that conveys the different realities of a person or community in a way that the magical and the ordinary are seamlessly blended in one. There are many elements an author utilizes to create this type of fiction. Magical realist authors aim to write the ordinary as miraculous and uncover a reality of people or communities that are outside of the objective norm. Although magical realism is very similar to other genres of fiction, it has individual characteristics and elements that categorize it separately from fantasy. Authors of magical realism tend to use the literary device of personification to have ordinary objects and settings within their story, take on lives of their own in a way that is seen as normal to the characters. During the novel, Bless Me Ultima by...

Words: 1174 - Pages: 5