Premium Essay

Rebuttal on Gay Marraige Editorial Article

In:

Submitted By foreverme
Words 556
Pages 3
William J Bennett Article Rebuttal

Dalila Solis

BCOM/275

June 18, 2012
Robert Beaudry

William J. Bennett Article Rebuttal

Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness are not dictated by one’s sexual preferences let alone sexism or racism but by ones will to live and love. Over the centuries, society has evolved to allow for corrections to inequalities. Changes such as women’s rights and minority rights have changed to reflect human equality. Reading the Gay Marriage: Not a Very Good Idea article was a bit disturbing to me since I believe in human rights and equality. The rights for woman and the rights for males regardless of the their sexual preferences are being violated based on our constitution as it pertains to choosing who we want to partner with. The institution of marriage is an exclusive relationship in which one individual commits to another in mind, body and soul in a joint venture of their lives. Laws against same sex marriage exposes hatred and inequality to said individuals due to the nature of their union (male – male, female – female). The opposition to gay marriages contradicts our views on equality as stated in our constitution. Devaluation, as stated by Bennett (1996), of marriage because of sexual revolution is essentially stating that each individual is striped of his or her rights once they join in same sex marriage because the value of marriage has been tainted. Traditionally, marriage meant to bring businesses and political alliances together as one to improve their living situations; it did not mean it was correct. Traditionally, people were racist and sexist; also did not mean it was not correct. Tradition does not mean correctness; it is the passing down of the usual and customary beliefs from generation to generation. It was traditional for women to be the possession of men, for men to marry

Similar Documents