...iam O’Leary 1/9/16 Failure of Reconstruction LEQ Period 4 At this time in the mid 19th century, there was a changing system where the north had won the war and the south was destroyed economically. The passing of the reconstruction amendments enfranchised the blacks, but the reality was still the same. In the wake of the Civil War, the Reconstruction Period made an attempt to grant rights to all, but ultimately failed due to the intimidation and deterrence socially, along with the economic downturn. The failure of the reconstruction to grant rights socially was mainly caused by the intimidation and actions by the south to take away rights from the blacks. There were several laws and enactments which disenfranchised...
Words: 954 - Pages: 4
...great leaders have come and gone, all of them bring different objectives and plan for our future. As we move on, though, so does all of their “Radical Movements”. One such movement was reconstruction. Reconstruction was a period in our nations time some of us would like to forget. Can it really be said, though, that reconstruction was a complete failure? That all it did was make times hard for freed slaves in the U.S. I for one think that Reconstruction was both a success and a failure. When reconstruction first began in 1865, the people of America had just gotten over the brutal and destructive Civil War. In actually, reconstruction...
Words: 1477 - Pages: 6
...Radical Reconstruction in the South was a failure on many levels. Not only did it lead to an absence of capital in the South, but it also never achieved its primary goal of protecting the rights of the newly freedmen. Also, reconstruction never was able to fully enforce laws in the South. This being said, however, Radical Reconstruction did have some positive achievements. Most importantly, it led to the ratification of the Fourteenth and Fifteenth amendments, which was a step in the right direction in regard to freedom for the blacks. Additionally, Radical Reconstruction led to political offices being elected and not appointed, and finally, it lead to the connecting of the South back into the Union through railroads. The Civil war was fought heavily on the idea of eradicating slavery. Thus, Radical Reconstruction was designed to ensure that slavery was to be stopped in the South. It never achieved that goal because of a lack of capital. With no capital, plantation owners couldn’t pay the black men and women that worked on their farms. They...
Words: 552 - Pages: 3
...The period after the Civil War, which was meant to integrate the newly freed African Americans into a white-dominated society is called Reconstruction, but it stood no chance.. The goal was to bring an end to the cruel and inhumane treatment of African Americans. However, just about everything that could have gone wrong, went wrong. From a radically Democratic and Southern President, to a growing popularity of mistreatment of African Americans; Reconstruction would never have succeeded. After the Civil War, and likely the biggest catastrophe that hindered the progress of African American integration, President Johnson was elected into office. President Johnson may have seemed like a perfect president at first to radical republicans, but that...
Words: 469 - Pages: 2
...After the American Civil War in 1865, the South and the country had to be rebuilt. Reconstruction is the period of time when the government helped rebuild the South after the American Civil War. However, Reconstruction was a complete failure because it lead to the Jim Crow laws and racial segregation in the South, and the Southern rural economy got worse. African American rights were suppressed and denied after Reconstruction. The Ku Klux Klan developed during Reconstruction; they murdered African Americans to prevent them from voting. After Reconstruction ended, the terrorist group assisted white Democrats in their rise to power by threatening African Americans so they would not vote. Also, African American rights were trampled and suppressed with poll taxes, literacy tests, and the grandfather clause. Poll taxes forced a voter to pay a tax in order to vote while literacy...
Words: 583 - Pages: 3
...Reconstruction is the period that follows the civil war and is known as the rebuilding of the United States. It was a time full of great pain. Even after the military conflict ended reconstruction was still a war in many different ways. The struggle was waged by radical northerners who wanted to punish the Southerners who greatly wanted to preserve their way of life. Was reconstruction a success or a failure? In many ways, it was both. Reconstruction was a success because it restored the United States. Reconstruction also settled the states’ rights vs. federalism debate that was an issue since the 1970s. (Reconstruction, UShistory.org) In other ways Reconstruction was known as a failure. Radical Republican legislation initially failed to defend former slaves from white discrimination and failed to create changes to the South. The sharecropping system, which was a legal form of slavery that kept African Americans secured to land owned by wealthy white farmers, became common in the South. With minute economic power, African Americans had to fight for their rights by themselves,...
Words: 1180 - Pages: 5
...The Success and Failures of Reconstruction In the aftermath of the Civil War an arduous task of reconstruction lay ahead for the United States. Subsequently, the North and the South faced the many changes that were instituted. Mainly, it was the friction between the North and the South that prohibited success. Furthermore, Andrew Johnson's presidency evoked havoc on the then vulnerable country. Despite all, the addition of amendments resulted in some progress to the era; yet, states showed oppositions and formed groups and acts to disregard the amendments. In all, the Reconstruction era was deemed partly successful and partial failure; yet it did nullify slavery, granted voting rights to all males and ended segregation. After Abraham Lincoln's...
Words: 811 - Pages: 4
...Guillén Mr. Laird A.P. U.S. History 21 January 2010 Reconstruction: A Post-Civil War Failure Viewed as an era as a whole, Reconstruction takes place between the years 1865-1877 or between the Civil War’s end and the Union army’s withdrawal from the South. Reconstruction’s main goals were to integrate newly freed slaves into society, readmitting Southern states whom had seceded from the Union, and recreating Southern property as to better its conditions. At war’s end, the process of reconstruction sought out to solve the challenge that the disembodied Union now faced: what the status would be of postwar freedmen. While the North continued occupying Southern territories, Reconstruction shared very few successes. However, Reconstruction failed to meet its greater purpose. The process of Reconstruction was incompetent in integrating freedmen into American society because of its unstable and strained economy, its political disadvantages and its desire to redesign Southern social structure completely. Financial matters played a key role in Reconstruction’s failure, leading way to public hostility and corruption. Government industrialization plans helped rebuild the Southern economy however; the plans cost a lot of money to the government who financed such plans using tax revenue. Unable to keep up with the ever-growing investments, tax rates skyrocketed resulting in an antagonistic public opinion on Reconstruction. Conditions during this period were bad enough; the Civil...
Words: 899 - Pages: 4
...However, Reconstruction also failed in other areas, for instance Radical Reconstruction. This legislation was set up to protect former slaves from being persecuted by whites, and failed to produce rudimentary changes to the social fabric of the south. In 1877 president Rutherford B. Hayes removed troops from the south. Which resulted in former confederate officials and slave owners immediately regaining power. The newly empowered white politicians passed black codes with the help of a conservative Supreme Court. These anti-progressive legislations were to reverse the rights that blacks had gained during reconstruction. Sharecropping one of the many unfair civil rights against blacks after reconstruction , lead to them fighting for their...
Words: 298 - Pages: 2
...races, freedmen were given the opportunities they had always dreamed of. When asked about the education system the Bureau brought, author of Reconstruction: The Hope and the Failure stated it was “one of its most important accomplishments”. Introducing a free education system for all races to be apart of (which included grade school, high school, and university), we saw the beginnings of public schoolings and opportunity...
Words: 958 - Pages: 4
...The idea of reconstruction was to put the nation back together and readmit the states. Reconstruction as a thought had great intentions but was an overall failure. William A. Dunning claimed that the main cause of Reconstruction was “ignorant, illiterate blacks were thrust into positions of power for which they were entirely unfit.” However, there were numerous failures that had nothing to do with how educated blacks were. Contrary to what William A. Dunning thought; Reconstruction failed due to depression, laws were not enforced in order to cause change, and the weaknesses of the individuals who directed Reconstruction. Depression hit Reconstruction in many different forms. The depression of 1873 faced the supreme court with Slaughterhouse...
Words: 639 - Pages: 3
...States history. It caused extreme amounts of damage in the South. Leaving cities in ruins, and families without homes or the ability to support one another, or even themselves for that fact. People had no food, no clothes, and no shelter. Something had to be done to rebuild this disaster, but with every plan always comes a failure at some point. That is what I am going to be discussing with you today. The failures and successes of the Reconstruction. Failures come with everything in life, especially the reconstruction! When the congress gave President Andrew Johnson two bills to sign he vetoed not one, but both of them. The first one regarding the extension of the...
Words: 615 - Pages: 3
...A Failure to Comply Justine Marie R. Masangcap It is disappointing to see and to hear that President Noynoy Aquino’s Daaang Matuwid program against corruption has failed. From PNoy’s latest SONA, the programs that succeeded are enumerated and expounded. Education and poverty are upheld, but many say that it is still not worthy. The administration is still lacking in terms of programs and actions. Pay once said that during his reign, there will be a “Wang-Wang” ban and road reconstructions for better and easier travel, but the MMDA office is still experiencing traffics, transportation problems and road failures. Employees get late for work, students wake up earlier to prevent the traffic, business produce low profit and a lot experience headache and frustration. The Aquino Administration is fighting corruption, they uphold programs and services for funds and other financial matters, but why is it that DepEd is having problems in finances for the teachers’ salary and for school renovations? There are low number of teachers, low number of school facilities, but high number of students. It is not balanced and proportional. These situations may lead to students’ lacking knowledge just like in the latest news saying that a lot of pupils are asking why Apolinario Mabini is sitting in the whole movie of “Heneral Luna” considering he is one of the country’s heroes. In terms of poverty matters, it is said that the rate from the start of his reign up until now lessen, but it is not transparent...
Words: 319 - Pages: 2
... A case can be made that that the English foreign policy was a failure because of Wolsey’s mishandlings of the finance. For example in source 1 it states that ‘greatest weakness lay in the realm of finance’. This shows us that Wolsey did not know what he was doing when it came to finance which would have helped English foreign policy. Wolsey mishandling of finance would have led to less to money to help Henry invade France and therefore make on this part of his foreign policy, which was to take over France and to redeem his title as king of France , a failure because he didn’t really take over the whole off France. The whole real parts that henry had taken over of France was Tournai and Therouanne, and these were of little significant to England which supports the idea that the foreign policy was a failure. We can also infer from another source which support the idea that English foreign policy was a failure. In source 3 it says ‘if he fortunate to win it’. This is referring to Henry to taking over France, and we can clearly see that the foreign policy was a failure because only luck could have helped Henry take over France. This all indicates that foreign policy was not a success owing it to Wolsey mishandling of finance which meant that Henry would not have sufficient amount of money to take over the whole of France. Once again in source 1 we can see that Wolsey had mishandled finance which led to the failure of the English foreign policy. It states in source one that Wolsey...
Words: 1454 - Pages: 6
...In the provided scenario, executive “A” exhibits level 5 leadership skills. The individuals’ strong personality and drive for success is directed specifically on the company. A level-5 leader is someone who easily praises other employees and factors, rather than themselves for the success of a company. They also promptly assume responsibility for employee shortcomings and failures. This kind of leader conducts business quietly and believes in inspired standards rather than a charismatic approach. They strive to produce the very best results. In this case, executive A’s efforts yielded a significant raise in company stock. Leader “B” exhibits the transactional leadership style. “B” believes that employees should be solely responsible for their work and actions while taking full responsibility for any down falls. At the same time, “B” believes employees should be rewarded when they yield success within their projects. Leader “B” is just as passionate as executive “A “and believes in the same ideas and long term goals. But leader “B” has a more of a “cut and dry” leadership concept, as “B” strictly believes in following the rules set forth by the company, making sure that subordinates do not deviate. Leader “C” exhibits the transformational leadership style. “C” believes in inspiring subordinates to aim high and achieve goals. “C” not only believes in executive “A’s” values and ideas, but also believes in being personal with the employees around him. ”C” believes in engaging...
Words: 628 - Pages: 3
