Premium Essay

Research Study Review

In:

Submitted By cutedimplez2001
Words 423
Pages 2
Research Study Review
Lauren Jones
May 17, 2014
ENGL305
Lisa Burkart-Chalmers

Article Summary
This article discusses the idea of being in compliance with HIPAA transaction standards is reducing the cost of submitting health care claims. At the beginning of 2006, Bob Brown reported that there was little evidence that the administrative simplification provisions of HIPAA had produced any savings in health care costs. However, a new research report indicates that the standards for electronic transactions may be responsible for savings of over $1 billion. (Brown, 2006) Bob Brown relied on the research that he did a few months before to compare his findings about health care claims and saving money on costs of the claims that were being processed at the time of this article. He analyzed both time frames and nearly 25 million claims. He also pulled data from America’s Health Insurance Plan’s (AHIP) Center for Policy and Research for his research too. Although he didn’t look at too many resources, the couple that he used were solid references.
Thesis Statement
The author did his research about being in compliance with HIPAA transaction standards leads to a reduced cost when a health care claim is submitted. He convinced his audience and backed up his data with interesting facts.
Strengths and Limitations
The author did a good job with his research but it was limited. He used information that he already had and added to it. He did look to a couple other researches that were already done. I believe the article could have been stronger if he could have interviewed people himself or used more resources to get all of his research from. He only discussed the information that he had and didn’t include any other forms of research. He defined some terms but not all of them. I think the article was meant for an audience that was already familiar with his

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Literature Review

...What is a literature review? Put simply, it is an analysis of prior academic research so as to identify the who, what, where, and whys’ of the chosen topic area. You may or may not have conducted what some academics call a preliminary study – a brief search into the existing academic work in your chosen topic. After all, for some students carrying out primary research it’s vital that their work has never been carried out before and these initial studies are crucial when identifying a unique topic for research. In some subject areas, it may be difficult, if not impossible to identify areas for primary research and therefore a preliminary study may not be necessary (secondary research is usually carried out as a result). Whatever the starting point, the literature review forms one of the first major pieces of work in a dissertation. There are several main reasons why you would undertake a literature review. The first is to enable you, the author, to become absolutely clear on what it is you have chosen to research and study. By understanding other academic literature you can gain an understanding of what has been and is currently being researched. This will help with your own work by identifying windows of opportunity and helping to cement your research questions. For some subjects you may find there has not been much prior research in your field of study, in which case your literature review will have to be less specific and the academic net in which you search will have to be...

Words: 2651 - Pages: 11

Free Essay

Nrs-433v Week 3 Research Critique, Part 1

...NRS-433V Week 3 Research Critique, Part 1 To purchase this tutorial visit here: http://mindsblow.us/question_des/NRS-433VWeek3ResearchCritiquePart1/2854 contact us at: help@mindblows.us NRS-433V Week 3 Research Critique, Part 1 Introduction to Nursing Research – Theory, Design, and Sampling Prepare a critical analysis of a qualitative study focusing on the problem statement, study purpose, research question, literature review, and theoretical framework. This can be one of the selected articles from your previous literature review or a new peer-reviewed article. The completed analysis should be 1,000-1,250 words and should connect to your identified practice problem of interest. Refer to "Research Critique Part 1." Questions under each heading should be addressed as a narrative, in the structure of a formal paper. Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required. NRS-433V Week 3 Research Critique, Part 1 To purchase this tutorial visit here: http://mindsblow.us/question_des/NRS-433VWeek3ResearchCritiquePart1/2854 contact us at: help@mindblows.us NRS-433V Week 3 Research Critique, Part 1 Introduction to Nursing Research – Theory, Design, and Sampling Prepare a critical analysis of a qualitative study focusing on the problem statement, study purpose, research question, literature review, and theoretical framework. This can be one of the selected articles from...

Words: 4229 - Pages: 17

Premium Essay

A Guide to Writing the Dissertation Literature

...publication to the Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation. Permission is granted to distribute this article for nonprofit, educational purposes if it is copied in its entirety and the journal is credited. Volume 14, Number 13, June 2009 ISSN 1531-7714 A Guide to Writing the Dissertation Literature Review Justus J. Randolph Walden University Writing a faulty literature review is one of many ways to derail a dissertation. This article summarizes some pivotal information on how to write a high-quality dissertation literature review. It begins with a discussion of the purposes of a review, presents taxonomy of literature reviews, and then discusses the steps in conducting a quantitative or qualitative literature review. The article concludes with a discussion of common mistakes and a framework for the self-evaluation of a literature review. Writing a faulty literature review is one of many ways to derail a dissertation. If the literature review is flawed, the remainder of the dissertation may also be viewed as flawed, because “a researcher cannot perform significant research without first understanding the literature in the field” (Boote & Beile, 2005, p. 3). Experienced thesis examiners know this. In a study of the practices of Australian dissertation examiners, Mullins and Kiley (2002) found that, Examiners typically started reviewing a dissertation with the expectation that it would pass; but a poorly conceptualized or written literature review often indicated for them that the...

Words: 8324 - Pages: 34

Premium Essay

Grading System

...REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE AND STUDIES GUIDELINES A. Content Chapter 3 Review of Related Literature and Studies 3.1 Review of Related Literature 3.1.1 Title of Related Literature 1 Discuss the relevance of the related literature 1 and make the conclusions and contradictions found in the literature clear in the report. Use the guidelines below in discussing review of related literature. 3.1.2 Title of Related Literature 2 Discuss the relevance of the related literature 2 and make the conclusions and contradictions found in the literature clear in the report. Use the guidelines below in discussing review of related literature. 3.1.3 Title of Related Literature 3 Discuss the relevance of the related literature 3 and make the conclusions and contradictions found in the literature clear in the report. Use the guidelines below in discussing review of related literature. 3.2 Review of Related Studies 3.2.1 Title of Related Study 1 Discuss the relevance of the related study 1 and make the conclusions and contradictions found in the study clear in the report. Use the guidelines below in discussing review of related study. 3.2.2 Title of Related Study 2 Discuss the relevance of the related study 2 and make the conclusions and contradictions found in the study clear in the report. Use the guidelines below in discussing review of related study. 3.2.3 Title of Related Study 3 Discuss the relevance of the related study 3 and make the conclusions and contradictions found in the study clear...

Words: 1151 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Instituational Review Board Regulations

...Basic Institutional Review Board (IRB) Regulations and Review Process Content Authors Ada Sue Selwitz, M.A. The University of Kentucky Norma Epley, M.S. East Carolina University Janelle Erickson, MPH Institute for Systems Biology Introduction The purpose of this module is to provide a basic understanding of the human subject protection regulations that govern the participation of human volunteers in research in the United States. Learning Objectives By end of the module you should be able to: Describe the role, authority, and composition of the IRB. List the IRB requirements for conducting research involving human subjects. Describe the types of IRB review. Describe the process of working with the IRB. Identify other regulations and regulatory groups that require compliance based on the type of research being conducted. IRB Role, Authority, and Composition The Role of the IRB An Institutional Review Board (IRB) is a review committee established to help protect the rights and welfare of human research subjects. Regulations require IRB review and approval for research involving human subjects if it is funded or regulated by the federal government. Most research institutions, professional organizations, and scholarly journals apply the same requirements to all human research. Although federal regulations refer to IRBs, an institution may have chosen a different name for this committee. To clarify when IRB review is required, let's define some...

Words: 5985 - Pages: 24

Premium Essay

Mr Gindeh

... This chapter outlines the method of research, research design, data analysis and concludes with a summary justifying the research methodology. 3.2 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY Research has been described as a systematic process of inquiry and discovery which provides an original contribution to the existing set of knowledge making for advancement in any particular topic or subject matter (Kitchin and Tate 2013).According to Anfara and Mertz (2006) a theoretical framework provides researchers with the ways of thinking and a source of sight. An epistemological paradigm of thought to acquire knowledge provided the theoretical framework which informed the choice of a non-participant observation study, an aspect of ethnographic research. According to Flick (2004) ethnography is propelled by an interest of participating or non-participating in observing events and processes while they occur. This allowed the researcher to observe the subject from a distance without interaction (Silverman 2010). Consequently this allowed the examination of various published documents which included government office reports and agency archives (Bishop 2012). A deductive approach of reasoning was incorporated in the study which permitted assumptions from abstract propositions which resulted in the undertaken of this research study (Ritchie et al, 2014). Regardless of the method of research implemented there are three distinct approaches to a research study which are qualitative, quantitative and...

Words: 2585 - Pages: 11

Free Essay

Literature Research

...Literature Research Literature reviews are completed by students to learn the proper format for setting up their own research projects. The following is information gleaned on what a literature review is, why it is conducted, and how to understand completing one . Additional information on how to write a review is covered as well. A literature review surveys scholarly articles, books and other sources relevant to a particular issue, area of research, or theory, and by so doing, providing a description, summary, and critical evaluation of these works. Literature reviews are designed to provide an overview of sources you have explored while researching a particular topic and to demonstrate to your readers how your research fits into the larger field of study. A literature review may consist of simple a summary of key sources, but it usually has an organizational pattern and combines both summary and synthesis, often within specific conceptual categories. A summary is a recap of the important information of the source, but a synthesis is a re-organization, or a reshuffling, of that information in a way that informs how you are planning to investigate a research problem. The analytical features of a literature review might: * Give a new interpretation of old material or combine new with old interpretations, * Trace the intellectual progression of the field, including major debates, * Depending on the situation, evaluate the sources and advise the reader on the...

Words: 887 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Basic Institutional Review Board (Irb) Regulations

...protection regulations that govern the participation of human volunteers in research in the United States. Learning Objectives By end of the module you should be able to: * Describe the role, authority, and composition of the IRB. * List the IRB requirements for conducting research involving human subjects. * Describe the types of IRB review. * Describe the process of working with the IRB. * Identify other regulations and regulatory groups that require compliance based on the type of research being conducted. IRB Role, Authority, and Composition The Role of the IRB An Institutional Review Board (IRB) is a review committee established to help protect the rights and welfare of human research subjects. Regulations require IRB review and approval for research involving human subjects if it is funded or regulated by the federal government. Most research institutions, professional organizations, and scholarly journals apply the same requirements to all human research. Although federal regulations refer to IRBs, an institution may have chosen a different name for this committee. To clarify when IRB review is required, let's define some terms: * Research: Federal regulations define research as: "a systematic investigation... designed to develop or contribute to generalizable knowledge." [45 CFR 46.102(d)] If an investigator is unclear about whether a planned activity is research, the investigator should contact his/her IRB office. * * Human Subjects:...

Words: 5929 - Pages: 24

Premium Essay

Methodology

...Chapter 4 Reviewing the existing literature and engaging with what others have written: You need to review the existing literature because: – you want to know what is already known about your area of interest so you don't just reinvent the wheel. – Your literature review is where you demonstrate that you are able to engage in scholarly review based on your reading and understanding of the work of others. – Using the existing literature on a topic is a means of developing an argument about the significance of your research and where it leads. – A means of affirming your credibility as someone who is knowledgeable in your chosen area. Being able to interpret what they have written. The purpose of exploring the existing literature should be to identify the following issues: – What is already known about this area? – What concepts and theories are relevant to this area? – What research methods and research strategies have been employed in studying this area? – Are there any significant controversies? – Are there any inconsistencies in findings relating to this area? – Are there any unanswered research questions in this area? Purpose: – Assessing plan design – Identify potential concepts and variables – What types of methods have been used? – Interpreting your findings Getting the most from your reading: When you are reading do the following: • Take good notes, including details of the material...

Words: 1241 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

How to Write Literature Review

...Literature/Review Proposal DUE APRIL 9, 2008 Introduction The introduction to the literature review/proposal orients the reader to the problem under study and has three parts. First, you need to provide a statement of the problem. This statement sets out the general reasons that the research area is important. You might indicate the prevalence of the problem, its relevance or cost, its importance to theory, the relative absence of knowledge, some contradictory research, etc. Prevalence statistics, knowledge gaps, contradictory research, the need for theory testing, presence of puzzling anomalies, etc. help to make your case here. Secondary sources (books, chapters, review articles) or tertiary sources (newspapers, magazine articles) can be helpful in making a general case for research in his area. However, do not rely on tertiary sources to make your case. I expect you will use a majority of primary sources with a limited (small) number of secondary/tertiary sources. The second section of the Introduction sets out the purpose of the proposed study. This can be brief and simply clarifies how your proposed study will address the problem you have identified. The third part of the Introduction is a statement of the research question (or hypotheses). Write your research question according to the guidelines for good research questions discussed in class. Parts one and two set the stage for the research question. Recommended length: 1 - 2 pages Review of Literature The written review of literature...

Words: 1405 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Nr449

...READING RESEARCH LITERATURE #1 Guidelines and Grading Rubric– Week 3 Purpose The student will read research literature to determine the research purpose, design, classification, peer-review status, and presence of author bias or conflict of interest. Course Outcomes This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes: CO 2: Apply research principles to the interpretation of the content of published research studies. (PO 4, 8) CO 4: Evaluate published nursing research for credibility and lab significance related to evidence-based practice. (PO 4, 8) Due Date: Submit to the Reading Research Literature #1 basket in the Dropbox by 11:59 p.m. MT Sunday at the end of Week 3. Requirements 1. Download the research articles from the Chamberlain library. See “Searching Databases: Tips for Finding Assigned Articles.pdf” from the Doc Sharing tab for assistance. Retrieve the following research articles: Sanford, J., Townsend-Rocchicciolli, J., Horigan, A., & Hall, P. (2011). A process of decision making by caregivers of family members with heart failure. Research and Theory for Nursing Practice, 25(1), 55-70. Schwarz, K. A., Mion, L. C., Hudock, D., & Litman, G. (2008). Telemonitoring of heart failure patients and their caregivers: A pilot randomized controlled trial. Progress in Cardiovascular Nursing, 23, 18-26. 2. Download “NR449_RRL1_form” and type answers to the questions directly onto the form. Your paper does NOT need to follow...

Words: 1350 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Critique of Research Studies

...Critique of Research Studies Name Institution Date Critique of Research Studies The critique of research articles serves as a balanced and objective analysis of the research to evaluate the study’s credibility and bias (Polit & Beck, 2012, p. 111). With this regard, the current paper presents a critique of two research articles from both quantitative and qualitative viewpoints, to offer an in-depth examination of each stage of the research process, Quantitative article critique: Testing a Model of Post‐Stroke Exercise Behavior Title This article was authored by Shaughnessy, Resnick and Macko, and published in the Rehabilitation Nursing journal in 2006. The title of the research article is clear, accurate and unambiguous and also includes the authors’ information to qualify their creativity and integrity to publish the article. The title is of appropriate length, and identifies to the readers the purpose of the study. Besides, the researchers’ Shaughnessy, Resnick and Macko (2006) have high education qualifications, although the article lacks substantial information on their qualification for their degree of knowledge and experience to conduct such research. Abstract The abstract of the article offers a succinct overview of the study problem, to feature the high incidence of disability resulting from stroke among older Americans (Shaughnessy et al., 2006). In addition, the abstract incorporates the key elements...

Words: 1057 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Literature Review

...Literature Review What is a Literature Review? A literature review is a survey and discussion of the literature in a given area of study. It is a concise overview of what has been studied, argued, and established about a topic, and it is usually organized chronologically or thematically. A literature review is written in essay format. It is not an annotated bibliography, because it groups related works together and discusses trends and developments rather than focusing on one item at a time. It is not a summary; rather, it evaluates previous and current research. Purpose A literature review is written to highlight specific arguments and ideas in a field of study. By highlighting these arguments, the writer attempts to show what has been studied in the field, and also where the weaknesses, gaps, or areas needing further study are. The review should therefore also demonstrate to the reader why the writer’s research is useful, necessary, important, and valid. Audience Literature reviews can have different types of audiences, so consider why and for whom you are writing your review. For example, a lot of literature reviews are written as a chapter for a thesis or dissertation, so the audience will want to know in what way your research is important and original. Highlighting the gap in knowledge which your research aims to fill is particularly important in this instance because you need to convince the reader that there is an opening in the area of study. A literature review in a...

Words: 1153 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Nursing and Workplace Violence

...violence(Fernandes, Bouthillette, Raboud, Bullock, Moore, Rae, Ouellet, Gillrie & Way, 1999). The effects of workplace violence is far-reaching and costly(Hoag-Apel, 1998). In fact according to the international council of nurses “ health care workers are more likely to be attacked at work than prison guards and police officers”(ICN, 2009). The aim of this essay is to critically appraise a systematic review of the literature based on workplace violence in the emergency department and to identify characteristics of interventional studies to guide best practice. This review will discuss current practices in reference to NSW health policy and guidelines, critique the systematic review by (Taylor & Rew, 2010) in terms of discussing methodology and provided a comprehensive overview of (Taylor & Rew, 2010) article(Hoag-Apel, 1998) (NSW Health, 2005). Finally, this review will attempt to recommend a change in practice in terms of the research question of what are the suggested interventions for workplace violence in the ED conducted by studies from 2004 ? Based on best evidence based practice and research(Hoag-Apel, 1998) . Although healthcare professionals and exclusively nurses are at higher risk of workplace violence, NSW legislation doesn’t reflect the increase risk associated or current international concerns(Hoag-Apel, 1998) . In NSW it is part of a legislative requirement that staff receive sexual harassment training, however, even though there are higher incidents of workplace violence...

Words: 4091 - Pages: 17

Premium Essay

Report Guidelines

...Writing a Research proposal and Tips for Literature Review By: Shantiram Dahal 1. Background Human being is the unique product of the nature. In comparison with the other animals, they have most developed nervous and mental system which is very helpful to produce sounds and symbols (letters and numbers) that make possible the communication and recording of their questions, observations, experiences and ideas. To satisfy the curiosity and solving problems of daily life they involve in investigation. In modern times the complexities of human beings are increasing. To reduce such complexities, they have to conduct different research activities. Research is the essential part of graduate and post graduate program. Without conducting any academic research the objectives of the course will not be fulfilled. But conducting research is not as easy as we thought. It is a systematic investigation to acquire new knowledge, information's, facts, appropriate solution to a problem, deduce theory and generalization. It helps scholars to expand the area of knowledge and further study. There are various micro steps should be followed by the teachers for effective academic research. Before conducting research, the researcher have to submit the research proposal for approvable. When the research proposal is approved by the department then the research should be conducted consultation with the research guide. 2. Research proposal The preparation of research proposal is...

Words: 1547 - Pages: 7