Premium Essay

Response To Millikan's School Uniform System

Submitted By
Words 545
Pages 3
Uniform teaches that conformity is more important and dominant than individuality. Millikan’s school uniform policy is appreciated by some, not by most. I am not asking for the whole uniform to be taken away, but some leniency will go a long way. The issues with uniform is the enforcement, the extra work for the parents, and how the uniform deprives students of choice and individuality. I have asked just over 50 students and each and every single one of the students when asked about their complaints on the uniform complained about how there is a poor uniform system. First of all the staff are biased when it comes to enforcing uniform. Personally I have seen many students go up to staff members and have a full conversation and walk in completely out of uniform. Second of all the change out system is faulty. After talking to those same students 80% claim to have been fined for the borrowed clothing that they returned including myself. Also 70% said their clothing that got confiscated was lost. Also even teachers disagree with uniform because when students are out of uniform they must go to change out which takes out of class time or even leading to detention that takes out of training time for the athletes. So uniform takes away from valuable class and training time. …show more content…
The average annual cost to parents for school uniforms is $249. This could easily be avoided by being more lenient with uniform or just putting a stop to uniform in general. So every year parents have to continue to pay due to growing out of their specific uniform. On average only counting the 4 years of high school a parent would pay about $996 and that is only counting if the parent(s) have one child not more. Also the hassle of searching for specific uniform that is based on length, color, and

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Philosophy and Design

...Philosophy and Design Pieter E. Vermaas • Peter Kroes Andrew Light • Steven A. Moore Philosophy and Design From Engineering to Architecture Pieter E. Vermaas Delft University of Technology Delft the Netherlands Andrew Light University of Washington Seattle USA Peter Kroes Delft University of Technology Delft the Netherlands Steven A. Moore University of Texas Austin USA ISBN 978-1-4020-6590-3 e-ISBN 978-1-4020-6591-0 Library of Congress Control Number: 2007937486 © 2008 Springer Science + Business Media B.V. No part of this work may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, microfilming, recording or otherwise, without written permission from the Publisher, with the exception of any material supplied specifically for the purpose of being entered and executed on a computer system, for exclusive use by the purchaser of the work. Printed on acid-free paper. 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 springer.com Contents List of Contributors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Design in Engineering and Architecture: Towards an Integrated Philosophical Understanding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Peter Kroes, Andrew Light, Steven A. Moore, and Pieter E. Vermaas Part I Engineering Design ix 1 Design, Use, and the Physical and Intentional Aspects of Technical Artifacts. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ...

Words: 165744 - Pages: 663