Free Essay

Royal Dutch Sheel

In:

Submitted By fmurwa85
Words 1334
Pages 6
Select and analyze a specific transnational corporation, including its global operations and political activity. What strategies does it pursue? For example, does it outsource? Is it vertically integrated, or does it rely on a network of suppliers?

In 2012 Royal Dutch Shell was crowned number one on Fortune Magazine's Global 500 list, the magazine's yearly ranking of the world's 500 largest corporations (O'leary, 2012). In 2013 alone the company brought in revenues of $451.2 billion with a net income of $16.5 billion. Royal Dutch Shell Group, an oil and gas company, was created when Royal Dutch Petroleum and British based Shell Transport & Trading merged in 1907; the company is headquartered in the Hague, Netherlands but is incorporated in the London and Wales. (About Shell). It was in the early 20th century that the company began its dominate climb to the top of the world market in large part to their role during the first world war. Shell was the main supplier of fuel to the Allies, the sole supplier of aviation fuel, provided 80% of the Army’s TNT and by the 1920s it established itself as the world’s leading oil company, producing 11% of the globe’s crude oil supply (About Shell). Today the company operates in more than 70 countries with an average of 92,000 employees, 44,000 shell service stations around the world, over 30 refineries and chemical plants that produce 2% of the world’s oil and 3% of the world’s gas at 3.2 million barrels produced daily (About Shell).

Vertical Integration
According to their website Royal Dutch Shell’s main mission is to “engage efficiently, responsibly and profitably in oil, oil products, gas, chemicals and other selected businesses and to participate in the search for and development of other sources of energy to meet evolving customer needs and the world’s growing demand for energy.” It is with this mission in mind and a successful business structure in place that Royal Dutch Shell has been able to be successful in the global economy. Shell’s business structure allows the company to be active all the way along the supply chain and they are only one of four vertically integrated private sector oil, natural gas, and gasoline companies in the world. Their business operations are managed into three very distinct sectors: Upstream, Downstream and Projects & Technology. Upstream operations includes the exploration and production aspect of the business, more specifically, it entails managing of liquefaction process of natural gas and the transportation needed to deliver both oil and natural gas to market. Downstream operations manage the refining or manufacturing of crude oil and marketing the oil products and chemicals for home, transport and industrial use (About Shell). Finally, Projects & Technology concentrates on the delivery of major projects, driving research and innovation to develop new technologies as well as taking the company lead in areas of safety & environment and contracting & procurement (About Shell). Having a vertically integrated business model has proved very valuable; this model allows Shell to control of the value chain and tightly control costs while dramatically increasing levels of production and ultimately their profits and global market share.

Diversification & Innovation
Since the company first started it understood that diversification and innovation would be a key to their future success in the global market and as such Shell has been dedicated to diversifying its businesses and products. During the boom in oil fueled forms of transportation in the early 20th century Shell was one of the first oil and gas companies to explore and expand operations across the globe and develop more efficient fuel sources. Over the decades Shell has continued that traditions by exploring ventures in nuclear power, coal, metals and electricity generations. As discussion of alternative energies exploded onto public forums in the early 2000’s Shell was at the forefront of the renewable energy wave and invested in solar power, wind power, hydrogen, and forestry. Although the previous ventures have been unproductive to date Shell continues to seek and develop new energy technologies to bring to the global market. From 2011 to 2014 the company planned on spending $100 billion on developing cleaner energy like natural gas as a compliment to wind and solar power all in an effort to reduce CO2 emissions (Shaping the Energy Future Through Innovation). The company has also heavily invested in the potential of unlocking energy through deep water projects like the Mars B (Olympus) Development project; through human ingenuity and advanced technical expertise the project is estimated to have a future production of 1 billion barrels of oil while limiting impact on the marine environment.

Political Activities Because of the nature and of their business and the regions where they work Shell has been and will always be enthralled in all kinds of controversies ranging from threats to the environment, public health and safety, their business practices and most particularly political corruption. In the 1970s it was found that Shell Italiana was paying off politicians to the tune of £2.5 million in the form of political contributions and was recording the payments as advertising and publicity expenses on company books. Many more of the company’s improper political activities have come to light thanks to Wikileaks. In 2009 cable between a Shell executive and the U.S Ambassador to Nigeria it was found that Shell had successfully infiltrated several important government ministries and they had access to everything that was going on in those ministries. In 2010 a UK newspaper discovered that former Prime Minister Tony Blair lobbied former president of Libya Muammar Gaddafi on behalf of Shell and helped secure a joint business venture with the Libyan National Oil Corporation (Royal Dutch Shell and its Sustainability Troubles, 2011). In the light of the Wikileaks controversy Shell has taken steps to remake their image in the public. Reportedly the company has tightened internal controls among its different subsidiaries, professed commitment to corporate social responsibility, as well as launching extensive global advertising campaigns and other initiatives. Most recently the company has engaged in positive political action involving the environment; Shell is among 70 leading companies that have championed efforts to take on climate change and are pushing governments to take action as well. The initiative demands that governments enact policies that will stop the cumulative emission of carbon by setting a timeline for achieving net zero emissions before the end of the century, designing a strategy to tackle the global economy's reliance on fossil fuels (BT, Shell and Corporates Call for Trillion Tonne Carbon Cap, 2014).

Conclusion It seems almost an impossible task to balance the financial goals of a business with the ever mounting ethical and social responsibility the public demands of global corporations. Shell, like all transnational corporations have to carefully and skillfully walk the tight rope making sure that they meet the financial goals which they owe to their shareholders but take into account how their actions will impact the people and environments in which they work. Despite their past missteps, however colossal they were, it is definitely encouraging to see that a corporation as large and as impactful on the world as Shell is taking positive steps and it will be interesting to see where the company is heading in the future.

Works Cited

About Shell. (n.d.). Retrieved May 5, 2014, from Shell Global: http://www.shell.com/global/aboutshell
BT, Shell and Corporates Call for Trillion Tonne Carbon Cap. (2014, April 8). Retrieved May 6, 2014, from The Guardian: http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2014/apr/08/bt-shell-corporates-trillion-tonnes-carbon
O'leary, J. (2012, July 9). Royal Dutch Shell tops Fortune's Global 500 rankings. Retrieved May 5, 2014, from Reuters: http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/07/09/us-fortune-rankings-idUSBRE8680UY20120709
(2011). Royal Dutch Shell and its Sustainability Troubles. Amsterdam: Milieudefensie (Friends of the Earth Netherlands).
Shaping the Energy Future Through Innovation. (n.d.). Retrieved May 6, 2014, from Shell Global: http://www.shell.com/global/future-energy/shaping-future.html

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Shell Oil Spill Part 1

...spill and applying critical analysis and leadership theories to the problem is a challenging debate. A reader would tend to assume that Shell is at fault and should take all the blame for this corporate and ecological mess. Therefore, the introduction needs to provide the reader with sufficient historical information and background of stakeholders such as Royal Dutch Shell Company, Nigeria (country), Niger Delta (province of Nigeria) and its directly affected tribal communities of the oil spill. The introduction is thorough as to avoid explaining in other key elements of this research paper. The Royal Dutch Shell was ranked No1 as the largest organisation in the world in 2012 by Global 500. Shell has boosted its first quarter earnings of 2012 by 11% compared to that of 2011. Shells long term projects that have just commenced creating; a gas to liquids plant in Qatar and further projects in Canadian oil sands, have in part contributed to these revenues. Royal Dutch Shell has 87000 employees globally (Global 500, 2012) The first Shell Company in Nigeria was started in 1936 by The Royal Dutch/Shell Group. The Royal Dutch/Shell Group then founded Shell D’Arcy. Two years later in November 1928, Shell D’Arcy was afforded an Exploration license to analyse and search Nigeria’s vast landscape for the possibility of oil. In January 1956, Shell D’Arcy successfully drilled the first oil well at Oloibiri. Several months later, on April 1956, Shell D’Arcy changed its name to Shell-BP...

Words: 3193 - Pages: 13

Premium Essay

Vertical Integration Essay

...Carnegie not only controlled the mills where he manufactured the steel, but he also owned the iron mines where they extracted iron ore, coal mines that supplied the factories coal, the trains and boats that transported the coal and iron ore, and the ovens that coal was coked in (Online Highways). The company also tried to focus on using internal talent from the floor up, rather than buying it from other companies. Because he did not have to pay any middle men, Carnegie could aggressively cost his steel and still make a profit (Online Highways). With his lower prices, Carnegie began to slowly become a monopoly due to being the cheapest option in steel. American Apparel is an example of a modern day company that uses vertical integration. They start by knitting and dying fabrics, and continue all the way to public stores. Due to the lack of middlemen, they are able to cut production costs, and because they are entirely in the United States, they are able to cut shipping costs by not using foreign vendors (American Apparel. This supplies American’s with jobs rather than outsourcing to another country (American Apparel). People like the idea of supporting their country rather than a foreign one, so people tend to buy American-products (Economist), giving American Apparel an advantage over other companies. Vertical integration gives society more competitive prices, meaning the consumer saves money as well as the companies. Vertical integration creates more jobs, leading to more...

Words: 376 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

How Leaders Develop Leaders

...“How am I doing as a leader?” asks Larry Bossidy, CEO of AlliedSignal in a meeting with his operating mangers. “The answer is, how are the people you lead doing? Do they learn? Do they visit customers? Do they manage conflict and initiate change? Are they growing and being promoted? “When you retire, you won’t remember what you did in the first quarter of 1994, or the third. You’ll remember how many people you developed – how many you helped have a better career because of your interest and dedication to their development. When you’re confused about how you’re doing as a leader, find out how the people you lead are doing. You’ll know the answer.” Andy Grove, CEO of Intel: Roger Enrico, CEO of PepsiCo; Jack Welch, CEO of General Electric; and Admiral Ray Smith of the U.S. Special Operations Command agree with Bossidy. All are respected leaders of successful organizations that constantly outthink and outmaneuver their competitors. Though those leaders have been 1 2 instrumental in their companies’ success, they have also built large pools of talent. They have contributed to their organizations’ success by personally developing leaders at all levels. Once upon a time Here’s what you would see if you visited Grove, Enrico, Welch, and Smith leading their businesses. Intel. In Santa Clara, California, Andy Grove is teaching Intel managers how to lead in an industry in which the product (semiconductors) doubles in capacity every 18 months. In Grove’s teaching sessions, he...

Words: 9068 - Pages: 37

Premium Essay

Pacific Brands

...MINOR ASSIGNMENT MARKETING CONCEPT As one of the world’s leading energy companies Shell plays a key role in helping to meet the world’s growing energy demand in economically, environmentally and socially responsible ways. Shell has been active in Australia since 1901.  Its business activities in Australia are exploring and producing oil and gas, and refining, supplying, manufacturing and marketing a range of oil products. They hold 850+ of Shell branded gas stations. With the steep hike of petrol prices around the world and the competitive prices from other oil and gas companies, what will attract consumers to choose the right retail petrol outlet to visit? Marketing plays an integral part of this question with the concept of the four P’s of the Marketing Mix on the petrol retail outlet of Shell Coles Express. A marketing mix is a combination of the product itself, the price of the product, the place where it is made available and the activities that introduce it to consumers that create a desired response among a set of predefined consumers. – (pg 21, Marketing 2 – real people, real choices. PRODUCT A product is considered to be a good, a service or a blend of both. It is not limited to just ‘physical goods’. The product area in the marketing mix is concerned with developing the right ‘product’ for the target market. The Shell brand is known for high performance through the motor sport industry from providing its products to the...

Words: 1318 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Shell, Greenpeace

...Summary Shell, one of the largest multinational oil companies planned to dispose of the Brent Spar, which was huge floating oil storage and loading buoy, by sinking it at a site in the deep Northern Atlantic, with full UK Government approval. But a combination of Greenpeace, European Ministers and the public stopped them. In order to ensure that no similar incidents occur in the future, the Shell UK should seek to build an open and transparent process, involve environmental interest group like Greenpeace. Issues Disposal Options: In the last analysis, there were two options; horizontal on-shore dismantling and deep water disposal. Shell qualified the deep water disposal option as Best Practicable Environmental Option (BPEO). BEPO Process: Several options were evaluated according to engineering complexity, risk to health and safety of workforce, environmental impact, cost, and acceptability by the British authorities and other interested parties, such as fishermen’s associations. It is important to that stakeholders such as Greenpeace were not included. Deep water disposal option: The deep water disposal option had the advantage on the grounds of engineering complexity, risk to health and safety of the work force, and cost (about 11 million pounds versus 46 million pounds). Regulatory Principles: The International Maritime Organization’s (IMO) guidelines and UK legislation stipulate that sinking in the ocean is an acceptable option. Shell’ position: Shell was seen to...

Words: 961 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Estore at Shell Canada Limited

...eStore at Shell Canada Limited Executive summary: In 2003, Shell Canada Limited build up an e-Store developed from eCATS. The purpose was save cost and increase market share. However, it was not achieve the organization’s goal. The key issues are how to proving front and back end application, as well as promotion customer usage in e-Store. Current Situation: Shell had build up an e-Store that was an important company’s strategically project. Shell leveraged its international resources and took advantage of eCATS as the basis for the self-serve application, which reduced the development costs considerably. A success e-store could switch existing clients to a lean, faster e-commerce platform to achieve cost savings objective. However, e-Store could not reach an expected object because there is a few factors that effect both internally and externally application. Internal issues arose from both business and IT: • Inadequate training, communication, motivation to sales personnel • Did not pay enough attention to users’ needs • Lake of system integration (Front and Back) • Security added barriers to inconvenient use of the site • System performance (Order processing takes time) • Difficult to use (SSO - single sign-on confusion) External issues: • Some customers never heard of e-store. • Customers prefer to make deals through face-to-face or 1-800 line over internet The major low usage could...

Words: 700 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Brent Spar

...Environment Management Assignment Key Learning from Brent Spar Incident Key Learnings 1. The first issue that a corporation should understand is consumer. Consumers have always been important and around. But off recent trends the consumers have become more important in another respect: Environment consciousness. Thus it has become difficult to manipulate them into buying a tainted brand. Thus the corporate is faced with an issue of Environmental responsibility. It is difficult to change this image in the consumer’s mind once they believe that something wrong is being done and a crime is being committed. This goes against the morale of the consumer. He feels betrayed in a way. 2. Two most important attributes that a company requires is credibility and trustworthiness. When these are taken into consideration with respect to the Brent Spar Case, Shell had its facts set straight. But they were low on credibility. They seemed to come off as a snobbish brand as they always followed a top down approach. They had all their plans and strategies laid out to win the case but were left out in the open once Greenpeace intervened in the process. Greenpeace had come out in the open calling it foul play. The common man moved towards Greenpeace and sympathized with their efforts because the consumers trusted Greenpeace and based it on the face that they believed it to be trustworthy. 3. The single most important point one should take away from this case...

Words: 509 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Shell Csr

...Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Strategy The vision underlying the message was that the pursuit of profits had to be tempered by care for the environment and concern for people - both now and in the future. This meant that if Shell wanted to stay in business, prosper and grow in the future, it had to find effective ways to incorporate the principles of sustainable development into its business practices - not as an option but as a necessity to survive. Shell reviewed all aspects of its activities in light of what it learned about sustainable development and society's changing expectations towards the behaviour of business. In 1997, Shell decided that, in parallel with its efforts at internal transformation, it would launch a new global, social investment effort that would concentrate on working with external partners to advance sustainable development worldwide. This decision ultimately led to the establishment of the Shell Foundation. Shell’s worldwide social investment initiative promotes sustainable development. Their main aim is to maximize benefit to the society and environment and to have integrity in their operations. The main aim is to maximize benefit to the society and environment and to have integrity in their operations. There are 6 main programs under the Shell Foundation namely: Aspire, Trading UP, Embarq, Breathing Space, Excelerate, and Climate Change ASPIRE: Through a long and close partnership with GroFin - a specialist business developer...

Words: 1134 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Economic Development

...Mälardalen University School of Sustainable Development of Society and Technology International Business and Entrepreneurship master program Master Thesis, course EFO705 Tutor: Leif Linnskog 03.06.2008 Economic Development through Globalisation in Nigeria An analysis of Shell & the IMF Structural Adjustment Programs Sven Bokhari 820619-P291 Fabrizio Del Duca 791225-P114 Group number: 1983 Summary Date: Level: Authors: 2008/06/03 Master thesis in International Business and Entrepreneurship, 10p (15ECTS) Sven Bokhari Västerås Date of birth: 19820619 Fabrizio Del Duca Västerås Date of birth: 19791225 Title: Economic Development through globalisation in Nigeria. An analysis of Shell & the IMF Structural Adjustment Programs Leif Linnskog, Ph.D. Tutor: Research Question: Can globalisation be seen as positive or negative for the Economic Development of Nigeria? A focus on Shell and the International Monetary Fund Research Issue: Globalisation in its current form is viewed in the Western world as a positive influence for the Economic Development of under developed countries. However these views on the benefits brought to developing countries have been frequently disputed. The research we are undertaking is a pilot study based on documentary research. Our source of information is secondary data such as books, articles, newspapers and journals. The study employs a qualitative approach. Even though globalisation is often viewed as positive we have discovered that...

Words: 22560 - Pages: 91

Free Essay

Mba in Ioil and Gas

...Q(1)… Summarise the information provided in this report for your region. A(1)… The Report comments about Refinery closures/capacity reductions within Europe. * In July, ConocoPhillips cancelled plans to upgrade its 260,000-b/d refinery at Wilhelmshaven, Germany. * Switzerland in October, Petroplus Holdings AG, Zug, began to shut down of its 60,000-b/d Cressier refinery in Neuchatel. The company attributed the action to the labour strike at the port of Fos Sur Mer, France, which it said was disrupting the supply of crude to the Cressier refinery. Reopening the plant would depend on market conditions following the end of the strike, said the company. * In Europe in August, Royal Dutch Shell PLC agreed to sell its 90,000-b/d Heide refinery in Germany to family investment firm Klesch & Co. October, Shell announced plans to sell a majority of its refining and marketing businesses in Finland and Sweden to Finnish company Keele Oy. Q(2)… Do you agree with its conclusions for your region? If not, state why not. A(2)… The Report does not include the TOTAL Laggan Tormore Gas Plant construction on Shetland Isles, South Hook LNG Refinery Upgrades or LNG Regasification Projects in Poland. Q(3)… Also complement your regional summary with information about capacities and development of the main refineries operating in your country. A(3)… In the UK, there are 9 Main Refineries. All have ongoing Brownfield Projects, due to infrastructure upgrades. UK capacity...

Words: 300 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Shell Response to Turmoil

...Is Shell really Arctic ready? Nick Butler | Jan 14 2013 14:59 | 10 | Share Shell's drilling barge the Kulluk. Getty Images There are two important lessons from the mounting problems facing Shell as a result of the series of accidents that have afflicted its drilling programme in the Arctic. The first is that major companies must have the capacity to call a halt and to break the inexorable internal momentum that so often makes it impossible to stop projects once they have started. The ability to reconsider is a great sign of strength not weakness. The second is that a company such as Shell, which prides itself (rightly) on its environmental performance, is only as good as its weakest contractor. A series of relatively small problems have now brought Shell’s Arctic drilling programme to a halt. The latest incident in which a drilling ship that had been working in the Beaufort Sea was grounded at Sitkalidak as it was being moved south has led to a full review of the whole programme by the US Interior Department. There are demands for a full scale Congressional inquiry. The damaged rig, one of the few specially equipped to work in the Arctic – will not be easy to replace in time for the next drilling season. None of the incidents has actually caused a significant environmental problem, which is why I use the words “relatively small”. But the Arctic is different. The area is stunning and within easy reach of the US news media. If a spill did occur, the risks are enormous....

Words: 2178 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Customized Product

...Name Professor’s name Course number Date Customized Products Product customizing can be defined as the process of producing products in response to specific demands of the customers. Customization of products is relevant because it makes distinctions between variety and customized products. Variety simply involves several choices from which a customer can choose (Hall 8). The aim of customization of products is to fulfil individual needs of customers. Basically, many customers do not want choice. Instead, a customer wants exactly what they require. The intention of making customized products is to increase the perceived customers’ values to a specific product. Advances in technology have made product customization economically feasible. This is because willingness to pay for customized products depends on the use of the product and the desire of the product. The willingness of the customers to pay more relies on the standard of products and its negative attributes that can only be avoided through customization mass. The aim of this paper is to examine product customization in different international companies (Darley 54). Petroleum companies are companies that operate within the oil and gas industry in the energy sector. These companies produce oil related products, gas, and petrochemical products. These products have high demands across the world because they form the basic necessities of transport, automobile, and industrial energy sectors. Customization of petroleum products...

Words: 3284 - Pages: 14

Free Essay

Dual Listing Company

...Merrill Lynch The Dual Listings July 2002 EVENT DRIVEN & EQUITY ARBITRAGE SALES FOR INTERNAL USE ONLY Trades Examined: UK - Netherlands Reed Elsevier NV (REN NA) vs Reed Elsevier Plc (REL LN) Royal Dutch Petroleum (RDA NA) vs Shell Transport & Trading Co Plc (SHEL LN) Unilever NV (UNA NA) vs Unilever Plc (ULVR LN) UK - Australia BHP Billiton Ltd (BHP AU) vs BHP Billiton Plc (BLT LN) Brambles Industries Ltd (BIL AU) vs Brambles Industries Plc (BI/ LN) Rio Tinto Ltd (RIO AU) vs Rio Tinto Plc (RIO LN) Introduction: The purpose of this report is to provide a basic overview of the dual-listing environment, highlighting the nature of company structures involved, why the structures were adopted and how they work. Contents: Page 1. Frequently Asked Questions 2 2. Why do Dual Listed Companies Exist? 4 3. Dual Listing Structures 5 4. Currency Risk 6 5. Terminology 7 6. Factors Affecting Performance 8 Appendix 1: Stock Specific Data A.1 Reed Elsevier NV vs Reed Elsevier Plc 10 A.2 Royal Dutch NV vs Shell T&T Plc 12 A.3 Unilever NV vs Unilever Plc 14 A.4 BHP Billiton Ltd vs BHP Billiton Plc 16 A.5 Brambles Ind. Ltd vs Brambles Ind. Plc 18 A.6 Rio Tinto Ltd vs Rio Tinto Plc 20 Glossary of Terms 22 1. Frequently Asked Questions Q. What is a dual listed structure? Where a company is listed on two exchanges it is referred to as a...

Words: 4065 - Pages: 17

Free Essay

International Forces

...counterpart. International companies encounter different kinds of international environmental forces that impact their business. Most of the international environmental forces are; Cultural, Physical, Political, Intellectual, Legal, International Monetary system and Financial forces. These force are very important for a company to consider carefully before it ventures into any country for business. International companies that did not manage these international environmental forces properly have gone out of business. Most Multinationals in recent times have dedicated departments that handle these forces. This capstone project will discuss the impact of international environmental forces on Shell Petroleum Development Company. Shell is a Royal Dutch company that has many locations globally, and is one of the major oil companies in the world. Most of its international environmental forces issues will mainly focus on Nigeria, where the company has been operating since 1937 and also the United States. One ethical issue the company has face in the international business environment will also be analyzed. Finally, there will be conclusion that will restate the major points of the paper and the various points mentioned. INTERNATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL FORCES The seven International environmental forces are Cultural, Physical, Political, Intellectual property, Legal,...

Words: 3050 - Pages: 13

Premium Essay

Shell - Review

...Introduction to the Company Shell is one of the largest producers of oil and gas in the world. Royal Dutch Shell plc or commonly known as Shell is an Anglo-Dutch multinational company which has its headquarters based in Netherlands. The company was created by a merger between Royal Dutch Petroleum and a UK based firm called Shell Transport and Trading. As by 2014, Royal Dutch Shell has been measured as the fourth largest company of the world in terms of revenue. The company operates in five different sectors which include exploration and production, power, refining, marketing, chemicals and shipping. The company is sixty percent owned by Royal Dutch Petroleum and forty percent by Shell transport and trading. Is Shell Successful in its operations ? Shell is the leader amongst the group of companies in the sectors of energy and petrochemicals. The company operates in more than 145 countries and employing around 120,000 people. Shell is one of the largest oil and gas companies in terms of capturing the market share, production of oil and gas and operating cash flows (www.static.shell.com). For the last five years, Shell has gained the market share of 13 percent in the United States and around 23 percent in Mexico which is the fastest growing market in North America. Their downstream business have generated a cash flow of over 21 billion US dollars in the last five years. Shell has announced a dividend of 10.5 billion US dollar in 2011 and is aiming to improve the dividend which...

Words: 4115 - Pages: 17