B
As an actor, writer, and comedian, Russel Brand has a background that makes it easy for him to comment on various things in a very characteristic, and in some occasion’s humorous way. This is the case, when he comments on the riot conflicts in England, though with a serious twist to it. Throughout the text, Brand has a tendency to use a strong degree of irony and sarcasm to make his statements very clear: “Saying the behavior (of the people attending riots) is unjustifiable and unacceptable- Wow! Thanks guys! What a wonderful use of the planets oxygen resources. ” As the quote proves, Brand also uses these clear statements to show what his view on these riots is. As the style of the commentary goes, irony and sarcasm are not the only two supplements Brand uses. Another addition is his use of swear words and slang that makes the text, and Brands view, more clear: “no wonder they have their fucking hoods up” and “dopey ol’ Boris.” Brand has maybe also chosen to use this kind of language to make it easier for the lower social classes to understand, since his commentary is mainly directed towards them. Although, the receivers of this text is the general population of the UK as well. In addition, to make the commentary more personal, Brand uses personal pronouns like “I” and “we” to make it seem like he is talking personally to his receivers. Due to this personal aspect of the commentary, Brand wants the readers of the commentary to think about what could be done about the problem. He is, in other words trying to help the problem by making the riot problem an active subject through this personal aspect. Furthermore, it could be argued that Brand also has a slight use of the rhetorical strategies in his commentary. The fact that he has lived nearby the areas where the riots are taking place, makes him a semi reliable source to the people reading his commentary. In addition, Brand himself actually attended to an anarchist protest similar to the ongoing riots: “I found those protests exiting, yes, because I was young and a bit of a twerp but also, I suppose, because there was a void in me.” However, in contrast to this argument, there are also arguments that proves against the authenticity of the things Brand describes regarding these riots. He says that he is not able to tell the whole truth due to the fact that he lives outside of England: “But I can’t, from my ivory tower in the Hollywood Hills.” Although Brand is not able to use any real proof, to show the reality of these riots, he appeals to the readers through Pathos and logos, and he uses them to show his attitude towards the riot problem. Firstly, it is clear that Brand has a general negative attitude towards the problem, and the way the government, led by Cameron, is dealing with the problem. “I remember Cameron saying: “hug a hoodie” but I haven’t seen him doing it. Why would he? Hoodies don’t vote, they’ve realized it’s pointless, that whoever gets elected will just be a different shade of the “we don’t give a toss about you” party.” What Brand means is that the government are overlooking the lower classes in England, and that it is a major problem. He also thinks that the reason for that is that the government think that the lower classes are doing nothing towards helping the government nor the society. This stands in comparison to the major firms and companies that, according to Brand, are keeping up the UK economy and sponsoring the government: “That the government existed not to look after the interests of the people it was elected to represent but the big businesses that they were in bed with.” Furthermore, at the start of the text, Brand also draws a parallel between the show big brother and the media in general. He says that the government forgets about the lower classes the same way the viewers of big brother forgets the winner as soon as a new season starts: “but the malady of reality TV stars is that their shelf life expires, just like dog years, by the power of seven.” This could also be interpreted as another argument on Brands negative attitude towards the government and their lack of action. In addition, Brand also uses Margaret Thatcher as a reason to why the young generation have no sense of society. Thatcher was known for her controversial statement: “There is no such thing as society.” Furthermore, his true attitude towards the riots is clear to see at the end of the commentary: “If we want to live in a society where people feel included, we must include them. where they feel represented, we must represent them and where they feel love and compassion for their communities then we, the members of that community, must find love and compassion for them.” This could also be an indirect message to the government, saying that they need to act in order for these riots to stop. In addition, this also attributes to the arguments earlier, saying that Brand is against the way the government is handling the problem. Overall, Brand has a good way of sending his message to the readers through irony and humor. This also makes the things he is saying more convincing, even though not everything is true. However, an overall good commentary that makes the reader think more about the problems presented in the text and the main points.