Premium Essay

Sanctity of Life

In:

Submitted By shary993
Words 346
Pages 2
The sanctity of life is when life is looked at as sacred, such as that God gave you life and it is a gift of God. Therefore saying that it is not right to take a life, using against of abortions, euthanasia, and assisted suicide. Quality of life is pro abortion, nobility and honor, roughly that doctors have accepted. The fact that people die, to me, is just the way of our life cycle. We are created, we are born, infancy, childhood, adolescence, adulthood, and then we die. Death is definitely not a pleasant topic to discuss. But that is the gratification of it at the end - Death. I do not think about death. I am certainly not avoiding it, for it is inevitable part of life. I understand what the purpose of life is, and the purpose of death. I understand we are here to survive and to live, but that are time of parting can come. I can either be demised as I am crossing the street tomorrow afternoon, or of old age in bed, as I am fast asleep. I recently learned that in Buddhism, death is not feared. According to Buddhist View on Death and Rebirth by Ven. Thich Nguyen Tang, he says, “… death is not the end of life, it is merely the end of the body we inhabit in this life, but our spirit will still remain and seek out through the need of attachment, attachment to a new body and new life”. As well in his writings, he mentions that the fear of death only holds one back in life, it retains you from fulfilling. This is merely my opinion of death. Maybe I think of death in this way because I myself have never experienced death. Although this Buddhism belief is new to me, I really believe in it. Death should not be thought about, because we will not get you anywhere. And preventing it, will stop one from having a nice fulfilled life.

Reference:

Buddhist View on Death and Rebirth by Ven. Thich Nguyen Tang;

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Gcse Sanctity of Life

...The Sanctity of Life The sanctity of life dictates that all life, at the moment of conception, is sacred and only belongs to God, therefore giving nobody the right to take it away but God himself. The idea of the sanctity of life is used as an argument for topics such as euthanasia, abortions and embryo research. In Christianity, it is believed that God made us all individual in his own image, life is a gift granted to each and every person, to commit suicide or to kill, is like rejecting the gift from god or denying that gift to others. The Qur'an states that killing an innocent person is equal to killing all of mankind. Not only human life, but all life is sacred. Killing is only allowed for criminals. Innocent persons, no matter what their religion is, are sacred. Neither killing innocent people, nor suicide, are allowed in Islam. A recent news report states that in America there have been around 56 million abortions since it was legalised 40 years ago. Abortions go against both the Islamic idea of the sanctity of life and also the Christian view of it also. Even if the baby is not born yet, it is still living just as we are. By killing an unborn child you take away their opportunities, chances to feel emotions such as joy and sadness and most of all, the entire lives that they would have lived had they not been eradicated simply because of irresponsible, inconsiderate parents. These children are unborn, meaning that they could not have possibly committed a crime in their...

Words: 418 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

A Feotus Is Not a Perosn

...who believes in the sanctity of life would potentially believe foetuses are people, for if all life is God given then even at this early stage God must have created life. However, it is certain that a foetus is not a person. Even followers of the Bible will find it hard not to justify that something cannot be a person until is born. Genesis 2:7 said that man was created before he was given the breath of life. Until a baby can breathe outside of the womb it cannot be considered a human, even by followers of religion, surely.  Peter Singer goes further to suggest that even babies up to the age of one month old are not people, for they have still not developed rational capacity, and to a certain extent he is right. Judith Jarvis Thompson listed the traits of personhood, including the ability to make rational decisions. It is certain that at birth babies do not have this ability, so perhaps cannot be considered to be people until a certain age of birth, however extreme this perspective may be. It is almost undeniable that a foetus is not a person. Even religious followers would struggle to argue against this, and in addition babies display few traits of personhood, even up to birth. A sensible time to assume that a foetus becomes a person would be at birth, though even at this stage they may not display the traits of personhood, so by some would still not be considered people. A foetus is categorically not a person. Explain how a belief in the Sanctity of Life may influence ethical...

Words: 1055 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Euthanasia

...short life expectancy that had the prospect of a slow and painful death, and eventual complete paralysis, while remaining mentally competent throughout the process. Therefore, Sue requested the right to participate in voluntary euthanasia to have the option to end her own life with dignity. The law in Canada prohibits physician assisted suicide, so she challenged the law in court. However, the British Columbian court ruled in majority against Rodriguez. Rodriguez then appealed the court’s decision to the Supreme Court of British Columbia but the court had dismissed her appeal to participate in voluntary euthanasia with one dissenting judge and forwarded it to the parliament. The final decision made by the parliament was brought before the supreme court of Canada, which resulted in a 5-4 majority decision in favor of the current law that criminalized physician assisted suicide. Sue Rodriguez case embodies a serious ethical dilemma. It raised many philosophical and moral issues; this essay will analyze the various issues that justify the Supreme Court of Canada’s majority decision verses the dissenting judges. The key arguments that Rodriguez made in court were section 241(b) of the criminal code of Canada. Section 241(b) states that: anyone who aids or abets a person to commit suicide, whether suicide ensues or not, is guilty of an indictable offence liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding fourteen years. She elucidated that this law violated her right to life, liberty...

Words: 1991 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Abortion Essay

...human interference and are called miscarriages. On the other hand, Procured Abortions come about through the use of contraceptive or medical procedures. There are a number of methods used to commit an abortion. One method of abortion is an early medical abortion which involves taking two pills, which happens up to nine weeks of pregnancy. Another method of abortion is a suction termination from 7 to 15 weeks of pregnancy which uses a gentle suction to remove the foetus from the womb likewise there is a surgical dilation and evacuation from 15 weeks of pregnancy and finally a late abortion from 20-24 weeks. Pro-Choice supporters think that Abortion is acceptable as it is the right of the mother to do what she wants. On the other hand, Pro-Life supporters think the opposite and prioritise the rights of the Foetus, as they see the undeveloped potential of each individual foetus and say that every foetus has the potential to grow into a great person, and abortions mean that it can never happen. Abortion is a very controversial topic as religious views may go against abortion for example christians believe that abortion is morally wrong as in the bible our bodies are referred to as a temple and therefore should not be tampered with however not many christians agree with this for example liberal Christians do believe that abortion is right due to certain circumstances for example rape however, in contrast secular and modern day views...

Words: 1750 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Abortion.

...the concept of sanctity of life which holds the idea that all life is precious and sacred therefore all life must be equally valued and respected. Natural Christian theologists Aquinas and Aristotle along with Schweitzer believe that as all life has the same value we shouldn’t be allowed to make decisions regarding abortion and we should let all forms of life continue to live regardless of any circumstances. However, philosophers such as Warren, Thomson and Glover argue that people have the right to decide on medical ethics as it is revolved around them (personalism) they believe that people should consider the embryo or foetus isn’t actually a person, therefore we have the authority over them and can agree on what we feel is the right thing to do with it. I disagree with this claim because as people we are exposed to many ethical situations which can have a great effect on us and we should have the first and strongest opinions on what we feel about situations even if this means not following religious principles such as the sanctity of life. The idea of potentiality is based on the pre- embryo has a potential to be human, then it should be given all the significance and respect of a person. This derives from the idea that all life has intrinsic value and people making an ethical decision on terminating pregnancy implies that that we de-value all form of life and suggests that we are ungrateful for the lives we have and embrace the idea that if we feel that life is worthless...

Words: 3230 - Pages: 13

Free Essay

Ethical Priciples

...next 15 years, her case received international attention as her husband and parents argued over how to fulfill Terri's end-of-life wishes. Although tragic, the plight of Terri Schiavo provides a valuable case study. The conflicts and misunderstandings surrounding her situation offer important lessons in medicine, law, and ethics. Despite media saturation and intense public interest, widespread confusion lingers regarding the diagnosis of persistent vegetative state, the judicial processes involved, and the appropriateness of the ethical framework used by those entrusted with Terri Schiavo's care (Fine, 2005) On March 31, 2005, Terri Schiavo (born December 3, 1963) died -- the final complication of a cardiac arrest on February 25, 1990. Her death was preceded by the withdrawal of artificially administered hydration and nutrition through a feeding tube. Prior to her death, Terri's saga was the focus of intense medical, ethical, and legal debates in the United States and elsewhere. These debates were characterized by confusion about the facts, ethical principles, and laws relevant to the case. Much of the confusion revolved around a number of ethical and legal questions including: Is it ethically and legally permissible to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining treatments from patients who do not want the treatments? Is withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining treatments the same as physician-assisted suicide or euthanasia? Is artificially administered hydration and nutrition...

Words: 589 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Research

...Philosophy of Law 390 10/1/10 The Question of Life Over the years the Supreme Court has dealt with some meaningful cases that have shaped the course of this nation. We live in a nation were the Constitution gives us certain liberties such freedom of religion and expression by the 1st Amendment, the right to bear arms by the 2nd Amendment, and the right to a speedy trail by the 6th Amendment. The Court has dealt with cases either philosophically, constitutionally, or both. “ The Supreme Court is distinctly American in concept and function, as Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes observed. Few other courts in the world have the same authority of constitutional interpretation and non have exercised it for as long or with much influences.” (www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/) One of the biggest delimas the court has faced is the original intent of the Constitution is in such cases as Marbury vs Madison 5 US 137 ( U.S. Supreme Court, 1803 ), and Griswold v. Connecticut 381 U.S. 479 ( U.S. Supreme Court, 1965 ), were originalist argued that courts cannot apply a general right to privacy in a politically neutral manner without protecting all sorts of illegal activities that are done in privacy, such as prostitution. In this paper I will attempt to show how the Court have dealt with the principle of Right to Privacy, active and passive euthanasia, and sanctity of life. I will also attempt to show how the court has dealt with stated principles philosophically and constitutionally...

Words: 2368 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Work

...sheet p. 8 Religion and the Sanctity of Life The Sanctity of Life p. 12 A critique of the Sanctity of Life: Jonathan Glover p. 14 Christian perspectives: Methodists and Catholics p. 16 ‘Ensoulment’, soul, and the sacredness of life p. 18 Religious views in conflict: liberalism and conservatism p. 19 Philosophical Problems in Abortion An argument against abortion p. 20 Personhood p. 21 A ‘person’ as rational and self-conscious: Peter Singer p. 24 Moral rights: the foetus and the mother p. 26 A woman’s right to an abortion: Judith Jarvis Thomson p. 28 ‘Why abortion is immoral’: Don Marquis p. 29 Anthology of Texts Unit 2 model answers: ethics (Edexcel) ‘Why abortion challenges us all’: Rowan Williams ‘Contraception and abortion within Protestant Christianity’: Gloria Albrecht ‘Virtue theory and abortion’: Rosalind Hursthouse Appendix: sample exam questions and level descriptors Notes Pages A Modern Controversy: the Case of George Tiller Profile: George Tiller (2009) To some anti-abortionists George Tiller, who was shot dead on Sunday, was a mass murderer known as "Tiller the Killer". To his patients and many pro-choice supporters, he was a hero committed to women in need of help. For two decades, Dr Tiller spent his life looking over his shoulder. He had become a lightning rod for anti-abortion activists and in 1993 survived an attempt on his life. He rarely talked about his work...

Words: 10065 - Pages: 41

Premium Essay

Ewan

...This means that the theory is accessible to the non-believer as well. This makes it a more versatile and accessible ethical system. This is a strength as many of the ethical systems including will only work if used by all people and for different reasons theories such as Kant aren’t as versatile meaning this is a more realistic ethical theory for people to use.     Once the Primary Precepts of Preserve Life; Live in Society; Educate the Young; Continue through Reproduction; and Worship God are understood, the theory is very easy to apply and follow.  It is easy to reach conclusions and the theory is quite clear cut in what it believes. However, the theory may come unstuck when one begins picking apart and re-understanding what the precepts mean. This clear cut approach is a strength as the principles are easy to understand and typically would not need to be disputed. One of the flaws of Natural Law theory is the question; do any of the precepts take priority over the others? Does educate the young mean invest in schools? Or encourage independent study? Does preservation of life include abortion and euthanasia? This poses a flaw due to the fact that people will not be sure in terms in conflicts of interested. For example some situations may cause the death of a pregnant mother or the death of the unborn baby, the precept of preservation may request that you save the mother whereas reproduction may will you to save the baby. To what extent could a believer in Natural Law accept...

Words: 531 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Same Sex Marriage

...Same Sex Marriage Could you imagine the love of your life in the hospital fighting for his/her life and you, not being granted permission to visit them? Or could you imagine watching all of your family and friends get married, divorced, married again and divorced again and you’re not given even one opportunity to get married once? This is reality for many same sex couples. That is why I am in for making same sex marriage legal worldwide. Instead of focusing on the gender of couples, we should focus on the love that two people share. Not allowing a couple to get married based on sex is discrimination and furthermore, allowing them to marry won’t ruin the sanctity of marriage. People today talk about this sanctity whenever same sex marriage issues come in. This belief is part of the reason why many people believe that gay marriage should not be legalized in many places all over the world. To these people, I pose the question, is marriage really all that sacred in this country that letting anyone who wants to enter into same sex marriage make it not so? In my opinion, people like Kim Kardashian, Nicholas Cage, Jennifer Lopez, Britney Spears and anyone else who will jump into a short marriage, for example 72 hours and then get divorced, are the people who are destroying the sanctity of marriage. I believe that gay marriage should be legalized simply because marriage is something between two consenting adults who love each other, no matter what their gender may be. Last time I checked...

Words: 1048 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Euthanasia

...will be no prosecution where the defendant was motivated by good moral reasons. On a legal realist vision of law, the law has changed, but on a positivistic reading it has not. What we have in fact is a rather complex and potentially troublesome juxtaposition of legal rule and administrative discretion. This balances strong social, political and moral claims in a society where there is no consensus as to the rights and wrongs of helping someone to die. In this context, the legal realist can say ‘I told you so’, and the legal positivist can cluck disapprovingly, but both miss the point, which is that the law’s messy mixing of messages in a pragmatic compromise reflects the moral impasse in a way that gives something to everyone. Thus the pro-life lobby can say that the law has not changed and no symbolic succour has been given to the pro-euthanasia view, while the latter can claim to have made headway in chipping away at the monolithic view that assisting death is impermissible. The right to lifers will be legal positivists on the matter whereas the pro-choice constituency will be legal...

Words: 6370 - Pages: 26

Premium Essay

Jgjhgh

...describe the point when life becomes an individual human that is entitled to rights. A person is a being that has certain qualities or abilities establishing personhood, which is otherwise defined by different authors in different scriptures and by different cultures. For a person to have rights means that they have a voice. Abortion is a controversial subject and to this day is still argued on whether or not it’s morally right to terminate pregnancy. Some people believe that abortion is right if the mother’s life is at risk or if there is a range of circumstance like the foetus becoming handicapped and others claim that it isn’t morally right no matter the situation because the bible forbids murder ‘Thou shalt not kill’ (10 commandments). Majority of people strongly agree that it is wrong to kill a person which is usually called a murder/homicide. Though others that oppose abortion generally try to argue that the foetus/embryo is in fact a human person. But how can one decide if human life is the same as a human person or in fact a human at all? Well a human is thought to be a man, woman, or child of the species Homo sapiens, distinguished from other animals by superior mental development, power of coherent speech, and upright posture. A person is an individual with a personality. Human life is simply a sperm and egg. If people feel as if abortion is wrong, then they will feel like a foetus should indeed deserve moral rights. The sanctity of life reflects the belief that...

Words: 1460 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Should Abortion Be Legal

...affiliation and family values. These arguments come from many areas. Most commonly they are from the politics/law, science and women’s rights. The question is should abortion be legal? The Democratic Party supports Roe v. Wade and a woman's right to make decisions regarding her pregnancy, including a safe and legal abortion, regardless of ability to pay. Roe v. Wade has been a monumental case associated with a woman’s right to choose. With the Democratic Party in favor of women right to make her own decision on the basis of sanctity of life many people on this side of the spectrum voted in favor of a democratic president that represents their own core values. This particular issue affects people in the here and now along with people that are yet to come. Republicans oppose Roe vs. Wade because of the sanctity of human life. They believe that the unborn child has a fundamental individual right to life which cannot be infringed upon. By supporting human life they declare that the Fourteenth Amendment’s protections apply to unborn children. No public revenues should be used to promote or perform abortions. The government should not fund or support subsidized health care that would allow abortion. “Republican leadership has led the effort to prohibit the barbaric practice of partial-birth abortion and permitted States to...

Words: 892 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Same Sex Marriage

...Imagine how it would feel if after meeting the love of your life and deciding to marry them, you are told that for whatever reason (race, age, gender, etc), you are not legally allowed to marry that person. That is a situation facing many people in the United States today. They are being denied the right to marry the people they love based on their sexual orientation .This paper will discuss why same sex marriage should be legal, including why religion does not apply to the debate against same-sex marriage, the sanctity of marriage, and why homosexuals want to get married. Many people ask, why do same sex couples need to get married? In the United States same sex couples are only allowed to get married in 17 states and the District of Columbia. Some other states allow same sex couples to have a civil union, but civil union does not give the couple the same rights that a marriage does. By allowing same sex couples to get married, homosexuals will be given some rights that most heterosexual married couples take for granted, such as family medical insurance, the ability to visit their ill, injured, or otherwise hospitalized family members, and should one pass away, the rights to continue raising children they had together. Our constitution was written to allow the ability of laws to change, and over the years, many laws have changed, including the laws regarding marriages. For example before 1967, inter-racial couples were not allowed to get married, now not only are they allowed...

Words: 784 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Lawrence Gostin Constitutional Right To Die Analysis

...Lawrence Gostin, a professor at Georgetown University Law Center, in his journal, “The Constitutional Right to Die: Ethical Considerations.” declares that constitutional law cannot be separated from the morals and ethics involved in the discussion on assisted death. Gostin defends his stance by reminding readers that the dying process is one of the most intimate, private and fundamental parts of life. Gostin also explains that the term suicide should not be used when referring to physician-assisted death because someone who is terminally ill is not taking their own life (because they are already going to die), but rather choosing the means by which they want to pass away. Gostin purpose is to propose the moral views to assisted death to his...

Words: 262 - Pages: 2