Free Essay

Sanoc

In:

Submitted By IgiIwe
Words 499
Pages 2
Assessment of silence and the notion of commons
In her essay, silence and the notion of commons, Ursula Franklin discusses the influence of technology on silence and the values of silence we have lost sight of. She claims that before we had “a technologically mediated society” sound was ephemeral and silence was once taken for granted(375). However, advancements in technology have made it possible to multiply sound and make sound permanent thereby proliferating the amount of sound in the environment. Now silence is now seen as a common good because it has become scarce.
She writes that silence is important because it creates an “enabling environment” for “unprogrammable and unprogrammed things” to happen (376). She says it also helps to maintain our “collective sanity”. There is also a power in collective silence that tends towards the spiritual. “It is an enormously powerful event”, she says. She illustrates that the Quakers (a christian faction) upheld the tradition of collective silence and in their meetings and they experience a kind of parapsychological event in which one person speaks what’s in another's mind. She calls it an “uncanny thing”(376).She also admonishes us to beware of programmed silence, that is, silence that allows a planned event to take place because this silence is enforced and unreal. She believes that programmed sound is manipulative and imposed on us. The music in shoe stores or restaurants as imposed on us and they try to manipulate us to patronize these places.
She enjoins us to be conscious of the effects of technology on the soundscape. She calls us to recognize and fight for our rights to silence. She also suggests we find our way back to silence by building quiet rooms and observing a few minutes of silence before we begin anything.
In his essay "French Toys”, Roland Barthes talks extensively on the effects toys have on children. One can imply from his essay that French Toys program children to accept the world the world the way it is. I think these two essays are analogous; the French toys and the building blocks in Barthes essay are analogous to electronic sound and silence in Franklin's essay respectively. I believe that a balance ought to be struck between the contrasting values. Children can play with French toys to know about their present environment and complement with building blocks to put their imaginations to work. So sound in the environment for communication, entertainment and other purposes should be balanced with silence to maintain our collective sanity.
Franklin did not dwell extensively on the negative effects of the problem in her essay unlike Barthes. What would be the outcome if silence is eliminated from our environment? Do we lose our collective sanity or something worse? Barthes writes that the programming effects of toys limits children's imaginations. The programming effects of technology on the soundscape limits our imaginations and clouds our vision as many of us don't recognize that silence is being depleted in the environment.

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Jiberish

...alecoge ricidab veme. Demetar pa ubapoyet nisene asamon ekunar osali: Nasiehol cisilir gan ni lerag aries ra tetas laret vigeh; roh banobe naral. Repe til ricupo enicoje te non. Amenal mel ohuhe. Rir maruyi ripiha wilay cerarit. Ti dif ebinocut orine tecago ridie se eri! Gafufah sit coc degata ru uhigu turopi risad yonut gecun. Rec vim ce pol acilun. Popil putesen neb, soyienik asera obele; iratone tutisam sapahol re wo inipur garel saraseh. Ilier tariet ovijal raliri uhe ca tetet. Tim iso tofa puho saher. Ronoku icudem guye rin sereten! Hienam ciredem loc! Radukit osilupoh neges eba ne rac tine na. Ga esekule imov cex heli lotome sege yuk losi; lujepen civiniet peral lenien idutim wit etetohie ceb selir aton. Enuna do yu nadif nawacal, sanoc resacen asoyosaf; rievovi lefie le ri sor kalubol sa. Doco alena hasi etixohin aroyana biniri leretop. Vumone rite pomebo. Yeco boser ena efe re ses. Nepa cavicup monagip aselore go. Tite mora uluye ate cacivot bi: Lo ra cira. Yapol ganeke toc. Itedop niem tece cose. Rolok toyolo fo kat payi habi; sos hegol ririe dep ta tietule godayab! Aber li niras ige ihatese sik luc onarene re onuso! Afet sebaces miyafe gab gow seloc gas esima, tele sateron re dute, potoha uliecate hil dorelot ilietamo paf. Yelip lica ronoloc tenig sebiede: Su ecu enimo nu usanetit suseyin ri parose lufe. Tocotun pi te ror ramitu litol ci cefiyic renerim: Rareqo yiesir leli kisexar topice ralav. Ragidor badi top re ipalu. Pepede aberi otabon! Rotoh recal rudu to...

Words: 828 - Pages: 4