Free Essay

Should Cannabis Be Legalised in the Uk?

In:

Submitted By mme01
Words 1141
Pages 5
“Cannabis should be legalised.”

To a large extent I agree with this statement; cannabis should be legalised. I do feel, that legalizing cannabis would help resolve many of our country’s problems and difficulties, for example street-crime or burglary indirectly related to drugs. However I also feel that it could cause other types of problems if people don’t understand the effects of it. To many people, they see cannabis as a dangerous and damaging drug, however the effects of cannabis are sometimes not as bad as alcohol or other legal drugs.
Keeping drugs illegal will only carry on the on-going drug related cycle: people get caught with possession of drugs, their third time getting caught they get a sentence, go to prison, come out, and it happens all over again.
To keep one person in jail for one year, for drug abuse, is forty thousand pounds.
When cannabis users come out of prison, they often have nothing to go back to, many find themselves back in their old life almost immediately with the same contacts they had before; the drug dealers. Even if they wanted to quit, quitting is not an easy process itself. Refraining from cannabis won’t result in physical withdrawal symptoms, unlike the nicotine in tobacco. However some long-term users do report psychological problems when it comes to being weed-free. This can range from difficulties in coping with social situations to sleep problems and heightened anxiety.
Rastafarians don’t have a specific way of living or religious attitude toward prayer, however they usually meet weekly to hold ‘Reasoning sessions’, as to where they have time for chants, prayers and singing. At ‘reasoning sessions’ marijuana may be smoked to produce ‘heightened spiritual states.’ Rastafarians smoke marijuana because to them, it is regarded as ‘a herb of religious significance’ and ‘to heighten the feeling of community and to produce visions of a religious and calming nature’. According to Leonard Barret, Rastafarians first began using marijuana due to feeling out-casts and the way they were treated in society. They believe that the use of marijuana is sacred, following biblical texts. I feel that using marijuana should be legal for many reasons, and religious beliefs should be one of them. Rastafarians are a group of people who use marijuana because they need to, because they feel that it is important and sacred, as said in the Holy Bible, Exodus 10:12:
-‘…Eat every herb of the land.’
And again in the Proverbs 15:17:
-‘Better is a dinner of herb where love is, than a stalled ox and hatred therewith.’

Yet, I can see why other people would disagree with this statement and I, because alternatively, legalizing cannabis could cause the amount of usage to rise and we don’t know the full effects of it yet. Legalizing cannabis could go two ways: 1. People, teenagers, stop because it is not considered ‘cool’ or ‘rebellious’ if everyone does it. 2. Because it is legal more people do it, at parties, friend’s houses etc.
Neither of those ways are for certain, and it is more likely that with cannabis being legal and ‘un cool’, people will try a more dangerous and illegal drug e.g. Cocaine. Not only are people worried that it may become more common, but do we really want to introduce legalization for drugs into our society, where our children are allowed to do it? Is it worth it?
The main worry about the legalization of drugs is that there are many dangers to taking drugs and the effects that it can have on yourself and others around you. However to this day, drugs are a part of our society, and whether you have taken them or not, you probably know someone who has. Many people know cannabis to be a drug with the side-effects of paranoia, memory loss, anxiety, confuses reality and non-reality, addiction, makes you lazy, depression, orientates everything etc. So it is not a surprise that not many people want to legalize it, however 87% of people who take cannabis have never had any of these effects, and 84% of people say they wouldn’t take it even if it were legalized.
Despite this, the religious attitude toward illegal drugs and even legal drugs, affects many people. None of the six major religions permits followers to take illegal drugs. Some small groups within them may for specific reasons. But the vast majority of believers think that taking such drugs is inaccurate for many reasons; they believe that taking anything that has a negative influence on the body or mind is wrong, and some religions also believe that disobeying the law, or government, would be false, because God established it.
Jews, Muslims and Christians (apart from Rastafarians and the Ethiopic Coptic Church) are strongly against taking illegal drugs because they believe that God has give your body to you as a gift; ‘Your body is a temple of the Holy Spirit.’ – 1 Corinthians 6.19. Meaning destroying it would be disobeying God. Buddhism is also strictly against taking drugs, as said in the fifth precept, ‘Abstain from anything that causes intoxication.’

Yet the most important points we have yet to discuss is: Why do people take drugs?
There is not one answer to this question, for everyone who tries, takes, and sells drugs has a reason to do so, whether it is for money, welfare or to forget about reality. People take drugs for various reasons, many to help themselves move on, escape from reality, to fit in, to be a rebel, to experiment, to ‘grow-up faster’ or to relieve boredom. However although people take drugs because they believe it is the solution, it often ends up that the drug becomes the problem.
Yet drugs in general can benefit our society and the way we live, if we do it right. By keeping it illegal are we needlessly handing over many millions to the hands of criminals when the government could tax it?
Are we wasting police time and resources?
If we do legalize it we could control the use and concentration of certain drugs. Not only would the percentage of drug related crimes go down, but also the percentage of deaths caused by over-doses, contamination of shared needles, accidental poisoning, or accidents caused by the influence of drugs.
In conclusion, I feel that drugs should be legalized but monitored by the government, not only would the government benefit, but so would our society, in the safer environment created by directing the import of drugs and addicts, because as I have said before drugs are part of our society, we have tried and tried, but there is no one way to get rid of them, at least if we have control of them, we can regulate the amount used and obtain it.

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Should Cannabis Be Legalised?

...Should Cannabis be legalised? There has been a lot of debate on whether cannabis should be legalised, there are many people who think it should be but there are also a lot of people who reckon it’s a unacceptable idea. Both sides of the argument are strong as they can support their decision, with facts; therefore the government has a very hard choice to make. I think that cannabis should be legalised because it seems to have a lot of good causes, and even though it would appear to have an unpleasant side to it, my opinion would be it has more good causes than bad. Nowadays most young people experiment with some type of drug, despite the fact they are illegal. The most popular would come across as being Cannabis. Some people see this as being extremely unhealthy and that is why they don’t want it to be legal, but Cannabis doesn’t have any direct harm to the user and it would seem to be the least harmful illegal drug you could use. Cannabis is also now classified as B opposed to C. This wouldn’t have had any effect on the public as the same amounts of people buy it illegally. The reasons I think it should be legalised are; Smoking is legal and the mortality rate and the amount of illnesses smoking causes are a lot higher. Smoking can be a lot more harmful to the body as it can cause Cancer and many sorts of diseases such as, Bronchitis and Emphysema. Cannabis is yet to cause fatal illnesses such as smoking does. The government refuse to make smoking illegal as it brings...

Words: 1354 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Anth106 Notes

...Anthropology Lecture 1 introduction Common Misconceptions with Drugs . The effect of a drug is caused solely by its pharmacological properties and effects. . Some drugs are instantly addictive . The gateway/ stepping stone theory - the use of 1 drug leads to the use of other more dangerous drugs What are drugs ? Krivanek's definition : Drugs are substances that are introduced into the body knowingly but not as food. Therefore illicit drugs, legal recreational drugs and legal but regulated pharmaceutical drugs that aren't recreational at all. - Whether if a drug is considered bad and is prohibited depends on the culture of the society in a particular period. What is culture ? The definition of culture = Through Roger keesing and Andrew Strathern's definition it is a system of shared ideas, rules and meanings that underlie and are expressed in the ways that human live. - This includes : law, beliefs, political economy, media and popular culture - this perceives ideas about what is normal and abnormal to society. " Culture is always changing and contested, not unified" Enthography as a method for studying drug use It is a process of observing, recoding and describing other peoples way of life through intimate participation the community being studied". - Participation observation, involving yourself in the life of the community , taking up the life of the other person, observing their actions, asking questions and learning what questions...

Words: 21869 - Pages: 88

Free Essay

Translating Reference

...Sydney Institute of Interpreting & Translating Address: Suite 206, 4 Goulburn Street Sydney NSW 2000 Australia Tel : 61 2 9283 5759 Fax: 61 2 9264 2380 E-mail: info@siit.nsw.edu.au Passage 1: Scenario: An international conference on issues relating to elderly people needs this passage translated into Chinese for session papers. Medicine and law and the euthanasia debate 医学、法律与安乐死争议 Medicine and law are the main social institutions at the heart of the euthanasia debate. Where euthanasia is legalised, doctors have the problematic gate-keeping role as the arbiters of terminal illness, deciding how terminal it is, administering pain relief and treatment and ultimately, depending on the legislation adopted, prescribing or delivering terminal medication. Medicine shares this gate-keeping role with the law, which serves a regulating and restraining function, providing safeguards for both doctors and individuals. The many safeguards required in most versions of euthanasia legislation, covering issues such as the meaning of terminal illness and suffering, the patient's decision-making capacity, the interpretation of intention and coercion, the availability of alternative relief, the responsibilities of medical professionals and provision for scrutiny of doctors' decisions, underline the complexity of the issue. A strong view put forward by antieuthanasia advocates is that the very soul of medicine is placed on trial by euthanasia and that doing harm to medicine...

Words: 15962 - Pages: 64