Free Essay

Sinful King

In:

Submitted By allenlarossi
Words 1129
Pages 5
Lessons from a Sinful King

Lessons from a Sinful King

Allen LaRossi
John Born University

Christian Fundamentals of Organizational Leadership.
Professor Jay Foley
6/1/2015

Abstract
What is sin, and how is it shown in 2 Samuel 11-12? Through this paper I will explain the Sins of Kind David and the long road to which he takes to repents and obtains forgiveness in the eyes of the Lord.

Lessons from a Sinful King Sin is defined as, an immoral act considered to be a transgression against divine law. In the book of Second Samuel we learn about the sins of King David. King David has committed three sins in the eyes of his Lord. David has coveted Uriah’s wife, commit adultery, and ultimately have Uriah killed to cover up his sins. King David’s downfall was fourfold. He saw, he sent, he inquired, and he took. At first sight what David had been doing was nothing more than admiring. Throughout time and in our lives today we admire, we tend to look at things and show praise to them, and give them the admiration they deserve. Take (Genesis 3-4) Adam and Eve would have never gotten into trouble if they were to of just looked at the fruit. We all have things that tempt us, but it’s when we give into the temptations we begin to fall. David had such a strong admiration for Uriah’s wife that he sent someone to gather Bathsheba so that he could lay bed with her. At this point David has already Coveted Uriah’s wife which in turn lead to him committing adultery with her as well. One thing I would like to point out is that at no time does it talk about the willingness or recentness that Bathsheba had in regards to King David sleeping with her. When talking about sin it is a two way street, if King David did not rape this woman then sin was had by both. The act of adultery has cumulated events that lead to a child between David and Bathsheba, where instead of trying to make things right the king, covers up his sin with more sins. King Davis sends for Uriah to come home from war. David’s goal is to get Uriah to come home and lay bed with his wife, so that once Bathsheba has her baby everyone including Uriah would think that child was his. When Uriah arrives back from war he does not even go home he does not think it would be right for him to see his family with his Soldier still fighting and not able to see theirs. So then David tries to get Uriah drunk, David thinks that if he makes Uriah commit a sin that it will overshadow the sins he has already committed. Uriah’s will and love for God shows to be too strong to break in the form of committing a sin. Uriah shows himself to be honorable in his decisions placing his desires secondary to God and whom he serves. The King was so caught up in his sin and in his lies that he has to result in killing Uriah so that his sin would not be revealed to his people. After killing Uriah, David thought he was in the clear until later months went by and we are introduced to Nathan. Nathan is a prophet of God, and was sent to let everyone know of the sin David had committed. You could even look at it as if Nathan what King David conscience, the sins and death had been weighing on the Kings for months till he finally had enough and broke. It makes you think, do you have anyone like David in your life, do you have someone or a friend that will let you know that something is wrong with you, or to call you out for doing evil for the better good not worrying about the friendship that could be in jeopardy? Also do you have a conscience that would not allow you to cover up something that you have done? When David finds out that Nathan is trying to do, he goes back to the same mindset he had with Uriah. The King wants to cover up his sins, he now wants to have Nathan killed to the point where he starts calling him a “son of death”. (2 Samuel 12:13) When David confesses to his sins, I think he had it wrong. I do not think that David was complete in his confession. David had not just sinned against God, but against Uriah, Bathsheba, and Nathan. Once David starts confessing all of his sins, Nathan assures him of God’s willingness to forgive him for his sins. If we as people repent and ask for forgiveness we should surely be forgiven, but the results of our sins will live on forever. Like I said I do not believe in sin, but I do agree the judicial system, and that can be looked at the same way. Everyone in life will come to a point where they have temptation, with Christian it could be something that is against their religion or it could be someone that is broke and has thoughts of robbing a bank. Both of these examples are either against the law or the divine law both of which you will have to repent. A Christian will have to repent and ask for forgiveness and serve their time under the eyes of God, and the criminal will have to serve their time in prison. In most cases in life all crimes can be forgiven in due time, and with Christian as long as you are sincere and true your sins can and will be forgiven in the eye of the Lord. With that being said you must still live with the consequences of your actions. Years later King David is still a murder and Uriah is still dead, and Bathsheba is still pregnant and their child is still destined to die. In summary of these chapters in the bible, weather you are a Christian or not you can relate and learn from the mistakes of King David. Every day we as humans are tested to our limits. Every day Christians are tested by their faith, but it is how we react to these situations. Do you give into temptation and eat the fruit from the forbidden tree, or do you stand strong with your faith and not give in. We also know that God is the ever forgive God and you but confess to him your sins and they shale be forgiven, but we must always know that know sin goes unknown or unseen, and the results of your sins are forever.

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Descriptive Essay

...A lot of folks depict paradise as lying on some remote island overlooking a stunning sunset while feeling the sand between their toes. My conception may be somewhat different than most people. I can envision beaming music, and people as they frolic. Where the party never stops, it keeps going and going like the Energizer bunny. The scenery will be the most divine of anything on this earth, more so than overlooking the flawless, sugarcoated snow covering the Rocky Mountains. Oh, my, the aroma coming from that city- like freshly cut bouquets of flowers on a sunny spring day. Forget about having a foul taste because it will leave only an everlasting angelic savor in your mouth. Paradise to me is cheerful music and people also, it has the most beautiful scenery one can only imagine.    All the masses of people would start getting together holding hands in a circle with Jesus in the middle and start singing in a heavenly language. The city is filled with thunderous sounds of every instrument one can imagine. Then, the angles pick up tambourines hitting them in rhythm along with the music, while people start dancing before the Lord. All of a sudden, Peter, Paul, Job, and all the great men and women of God lift up their hands and sing out with all of their capacity to Jehovah Jireh.    A rainbow is prolonged across the land. It has the brightest colors of blue, yellow, pink, and orange. It is so beautiful; the majestic colors make one want to reach out and touch it. A huge waterfall...

Words: 480 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

The Secret of England's Greatness

...cultural figures, which are central focuses of the painting. The Queen’s alluring white dress accentuated with the purple banner creates connotations of royalty and prestige. Equally, the garments that Barker has depicted on the Ambassador are atypical to the attire worn by Britons in this period. However they are by no means less significant. The Ambassador wears an animal skin cape, lavish jewellery, and fine linens; Barker has localised England’s prestige to the Ambassador to indicate to the viewer that he is clearly of importance. This then raises the question about the fact that this is an Ambassador, as opposed to the actual leader. One could then argue that the garments worn represent the King. This then sparks the question of what the context was that disallowed the actual King to be there. Were there domestic problems he had to tend to? Was the Ambassador merely collecting “The Secret of England’s Greatness” as a means to resolve the greatness that they might had lacked? Divinity is also explored because of how the non-physical concept of “greatness” is presented as something religious– a Bible. Given the context of a vastly religious 19th century Britain, the Bible is probably an allusion to God and his glory. However the fact that “greatness” is portrayed as a physical entity, leads one to think that it can be achieved by man. This is consolidated by the fact that Queen Victoria is handing the Bible to the Ambassador. It is a form of evangelism per say, declaring...

Words: 751 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Kings of the Old Testament

...How many of the kings of Israel were good or mostly good kings? In all 20 kings of Israel, majority of them were bad. However there was this one king, named Jehu, who ruled from 841-814 BC who was a not good but better than all the rest of the kings of Israel. How many of the kings of Judah were good or mostly good kings? The kings of Judah were mixed between doing good and evil. Out of all 20 kings of Judah, 6 were moral, 2 were mixed, and 12 were immoral. How did king Ahab go wrong? King Ahab who was the son of Omri, ruled over Israel in Samaria for over 22 years. He took over his fathers throne, and did evil in the sight of God by worshiping Baal and “did more to provoke the Lord God of Israel than all the kings of Israel that were before him”. Ahab again and again proved he was brought to do evil deeds, by his continued refusal to obeys the warnings of the prophet Elijah’s. Ahab had accused Elijah of troubling Israel by the drought, but Elijah declared that it was Ahab's own sin that caused the trouble for the nation. Ahab had declared war on God by killing His prophets , and therefore God then brought the war to Ahab. The war was between the four hundred and fifty prophets of Baal on one side, and Elijah on the other. When God verified Elijah’s status as His true prophet, Ahab should have repented, but he remained in his sinful rebellion, fueled by Jezebel his wicked wife. Summary of King Josiah chapters Josiah was eight years old when he began to reign, and he...

Words: 495 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Lady Macbeth Research Paper

...Lady MacBeth and MacBeth both possess some sociopathic, power hungry traits that are very sinful and can manipulate their lives for the worse. Lady MacBeth acts as the lever that MacBeth can pull. She’s the one that convinces him to kill Duncan and begin his bloody journey to the top. After he slays the King, Lady MacBeth tries to calm him and stop his bloodlust. She lies and fools everyone that her husband did not commit the murder and it works. She wants her man to have power more than he does. She is willing to kill anyone to get her rightful king to the throne. She is a ruthless, sociopathic woman with a strive for murder. MacBeth is merely her puppet and she is the puppeteer. He gives in to his manipulative wife and commits the traitorous...

Words: 291 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Civil Disobedience In Antigone

...justify such with logic, morals, and emotions. Civil disobedience is not a mere act of rebelling against the system in which all humans are subdued to, but rather a call for necessary changes. In Sophocles’ Antigone, Antigone, the main character, breaks King Creon’s order to not bury Polyneices, her brother, and give him a proper funeral. Antigone is deeply upset and decides to demonstrate her civil disobedience by doing what Creon said not to do. When Creon finds out, he condemns her for disobeying the law. Antigone claims that she has followed the gods’ law, and chastise Creon, “apparently the laws of the gods mean nothing to you” (61). She is not only troubled by the fact that her brother is being humiliated, but firmly believes in the “laws of gods,” in other words, moral standards. As Sophocles...

Words: 446 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

The Certainty of Punishment in Law for the Pursuit of Justice in Antigone and Measure for Measure

...The Certainty of Punishment in Law for The Pursuit of Justice in Antigone and Measure for Measure The concept of justice hinges on the beliefs of any given individual, human influences must always ultimately crumble and be brought to justice in the face of what is morally correct and divine. Punishment, conflict and pursuit of justice are major themes in both Sophocles Antigone and Measure for Measure. Antigone is laden with violent imagery; countless arguments causing conflict between Antigone and Creon as well as Creon and Haemon; and the blatant violence of the various murders and suicides present in the play. Moreover in Measure for Measure, is the conflict between justice and mercy, and whether justice and punishment would be served through strictly following the law or by showing mercy. "The law is strong, we must give in to the law in this thing, and in worse. I beg the Dead To forgive me, but I am helpless: I must yield”. (49-51) Why are Punishment, disagreement and pursuit of morals such a strong theme in both of these ancient works? Both Sophocles and Measure for Measure William Shakespeare lived in more primitive times when there were weakly enforced written laws concerning justice and fair play. The common solution for most problems were along the lines of "an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth" which were better represented in Sophocles Antigone than in Measure for Measure, retaliation were definitely used as a method of justice. When Antigone buries her...

Words: 2123 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

King Lear Research Paper

...mirrors the Christian conception of Man's relationship with Christ. Read this way, King Lear tells the story of Lear's redemption. Through Lear, Shakespeare affirms the Christian ideal of repentance as a means of salvation. Lear’s decision to relinquish control of his kingdom to his daughters violates his role as divine sovereign and constitutes a sin against God and his kingdom. By violating this sacred role, King Lear sets in motion both his own tragedy and the chaos of the kingdom. The notion that the King stands as God’s representative on Earth dominated England during Shakespeare’s life. As an aging King, Lear’s duty lies in ensuring a peaceful and legitimate successor. The first line of the play, spoken...

Words: 1842 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

How Does Edmund Spencer's Use Of The Fifth Deadly Sin

...In his poem The Faerie Queen, Edmund Spencer depicts Wrath, the fifth deadly sin, by utilizing violent, red imagery. The characterization of this sin is first seen in a power struggle between a man and a lion, the latter of which is “loath for to be led,” meaning that the lion is unwilling to be ridden (33). The lion, whose distinguishing trait is its fiery mane, is best known for being the fierce leader of their pack and as the king of the jungle. Therefore, the fact that the man is barely able to control the wild animal represents the amount of force it takes for an individual to internalize their rage. In addition to riding the lion, the man carries a burning sword and wears clothes “all… stained with blood… and all to rags y’rent” (34)....

Words: 283 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Mental Illness In Macbeth

...(Anderson).” This dagger foreshadows Macbeth’s bloody future filled with death (Mehovic). After this, he claims having heard voices saying “Sleep no more! Macbeth does murder sleep (Anderson).” Both of these events give a guiding vibe of evil to the reader for they take place early in the play. Next, Macbeth plans to kill Banquo; and not long after, he fulfils his wish (Mabillard). Sitting at the dinner table, he says “Which of you have done this (Anderson)?” when observing the late Banquo sitting alongside with them (Mehovic). Even after Lady Macbeth attempts to calm Macbeth down by saying “Feed, and regard him not. Are you a man (Anderson)?” he does not seem to understand that it is just his imagination. The guilt of murdering his former king and former friend has rapidly caught up to him and frightened him to his core through hallucinations (Mehovic). It is safe to say that Macbeth’s guilt is slowly ruining him, but he does not let these obstacles interrupt his reign (Mehovic). However, his wrongdoings will not be worth the negative consequences he is soon to face. Although his hallucinations deeply affect his mental state, his lust for power is the factor that vastly differentiates his...

Words: 1470 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Oedipus - the One to Blame

...suffering. Oedipus’ pride, impetuous behaviour and lack of insight ultimately determine his fate. To begin, one of the main factors that lead to Oedipus’ fate is his excessive pride. After he solves the riddle of the Sphinx, his hubris swells to a new level. This leads him to believe that he is capable of solving any puzzle he might face, including the murder of Laius. After Creon tells Oedipus what the Gods require, Oedipus states to what extent he will go to avenge the previous king, Laius, as he proclaims, “No matter who he may be, he is forbidden shelter or intercourse with any man in all this country over which I rule; … Expelled from every house, unclean, accursed, in accordance with the word of the Pythian oracle” (32). This quote develops Oedipus as massively hubristic. It shows this as Oedipus takes this distinct, simple idea that Laius must be avenged and drags it out. He makes a huge presentation in front of the city and blows himself up as this hero that’s avenging the previous king. This also marks the beginning of Oedipus’ journey to discovering his fate and his downfall. Another example of how Oedipus’ pride led to his downfall can be found in the words of the chorus. After recounting the events that led up to Laius’ murder, and after Oedipus realizes that he may be Laius’ killer, the chorus states, “Pride breads the tyrant; swollen with ill-found booty, from castled height Pride tumbles to the pit, all footing lost” (49). Oedipus’ hubris causes him to act tyrannical...

Words: 1047 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Death In Hamlet Research Paper

...Hamlet’s plan, struggle, and inevitable death Shakespeare’s Hamlet is a very controversial story of how the entire royal family of Denmark was wiped out. Hamlet is doomed to die, but in his death Denmark would be purged of its evil. Through murderous plots and schemes, it is revealed that King Hamlet’s brother Claudius murdered him. Hamlet is the son of the late King Hamlet, he was supposed to be the next king, but Claudius quickly married Hamlet’s Mother to take the crown. During the play, it is shown why Hamlet is a considered a revenge tragedy. Throughout the play Hamlet’s view of death prevents him from taking action, but through accepting his fate he is able to finally kill his uncle, without thinking about his death. After Hamlet meets...

Words: 1871 - Pages: 8

Free Essay

Sinned Against King Lear Essay

...ENG4U1a More Sinned Against Sin is something that everybody does, no matter how hard it is. “King Lear” by William Shakespeare the play shows how the character chooses to sin, and even sin against the ones they mortally should not sin against. King Lear proclaims that he is “I am a man more sinned against than sinning.” However it seems that does not only suit him, in the play. Many characters in “King Lear” have out done each other in sinning, because of people deceiving one another causing them to see the truth the result for this only ends in suffering. In relation to blindness, decisions and betrayal the result of being mores sinned against lies in the favour of one character Gloucester and Lear have very similar roles in the play, they reflect each other in many different ways. Mistakes were made by both, one more greatly than the other. Gloucester’s first mistake in the play was his trust in Edmund when he discovered the letter to what seems to be his “evil son” Edgar’s plot against him. .Without any further knowledge in this situation and the letter he right away believes that Edmund is being honest and believes the worst in his son Edgar who is actually legitimate, and this causes him to be sinned against. Lear’s mistake was because if his own pride, which is not the first, time his own flaws has come in the way. Lear is blinded from the truth and because of that he exclaims “Let it be so; thy truth then be thy dower; For by the sacred radiance of the sun....

Words: 1520 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Oedipus Rex Summary

...Oedipus Rex or Oedipus the King Summary When the play opens, Thebes is suffering a plague which leaves its fields and women barren. Oedipus, the king of Thebes, has sent his brother-in-law, Creon, to the house of Apollo to ask the oracle how to end the plague. Creon returns, bearing good news: once the killer of the previous king, Laius, is found, Thebes will be cured of the plague (Laius was Jocasta's husband before she married Oedipus). Hearing this, Oedipus swears he will find the murderer and banish him. The Chorus (representing the people of Thebes) suggests that Oedipus consult Teiresias, the blind prophet. Oedipus tells them that he has already sent for Teiresias. When Teiresias arrives, he seems reluctant to answer Oedipus's questions, warning him that he does not want to know the answers. Oedipus threatens him with death, and finally Teiresias tells him that Oedipus himself is the killer, and that his marriage is a sinful union. Oedipus takes this as an insult and jumps to the conclusion that Creon paid Teiresias to say these things. Furious, Oedipus dismisses him, and Teiresias goes, repeating as he does, that Laius's killer is right here before him - a man who is his father's killer and his mother's husband, a man who came seeing but will leave in blindness. Creon enters, asking the people around him if it is true that Oedipus slanderously accused him. The Chorus tries to mediate, but Oedipus appears and charges Creon with treason. Jocasta and the Chorus beg Oedipus...

Words: 3537 - Pages: 15

Free Essay

The Bayeaux Tapestry

...our “righteous” King and his cohorts. Scared does not begin to describe my feelings toward this battle that I did not volunteer for. I am just a mere foot soldier, an arrow cushion for the royals. We arrived a week ago today and it seems today will be the day of days. The Kings from our side and theirs are meeting in the middle of what will soon become the battlefield, or should I just call it what it will become, the resting place of most of us. I hope they work this out peacefully with some concessions. I am getting ahead of myself. When we first arrived we came ashore on boat and well let me just say there was nothing here, unless you count the forest. Well most of that went to constructing the Kings quarters. We found ourselves fighting over firewood to keep warm at night, although keeping warm almost came in second to just rest after our days. We work nonstop from dawn to dusk. It is just us “less” noble by birth that do all the manual labor, while the noble keep watch over us while they drink wine and we build battlements and quarters for the luckier. I find myself praying every night for this to be over, one way or the other, and at this point I am leaning toward the other, which would mean that I will never see any of you again. How I miss home. I know we work for a noble but at least we have a roof over our head and some grog and mead for our bellies. And it is warm at night. Well it appears that battle will not be avoided as the King and his cronies...

Words: 776 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Beowulf King Essay

...Good King/Good Hero Monarchies have existed for centuries now, all of which include citizens being controlled by a king or queen. These citizens may not like their ruler, but it is in their best interest to cooperate and remain loyal. Just as the people are supposed to serve the king, the kings possess some responsibilities with regards to his subjects. The king is supposed to distributes goods among the community, settle disputes, govern laws, and much more. As well as needing a strong form of government for a country to succeed, it must own a courageous hero, one who is devoted to his country. This hero must dedicate himself to his tasks and defeat anything or anyone who comes in his way. All above all a good king and a good hero must protect the people and ensure the safety of the country. Kings are always of the wealthiest in the area and are respected for sharing with those less fortunate. Kings can afford the most valued materials that others simply cannot compare to. “So now, Beowulf, I adopt you in my heart as a dear son. Nourish and maintain this new connection, you noblest of men; there’ll be no thing you’ll want for, no worldly goods that won’t be yours” (945-949). Kings bought goods for their people and swords for their soldiers to demonstrate their wealth. Only kings could buy incredibly expensive goods, which impressed others. As well as providing for the people, a king proves himself by offering protection. A king will be respected, well-loved, more if he can...

Words: 530 - Pages: 3