Free Essay

Socialism vs. Capitalism

In:

Submitted By townsendcd
Words 2335
Pages 10
Socialism Vs. Capitalism & Everything In-Between.
We have all grown up seeing that we live in a world that divides our planet into territories. These territories are bordered by imaginary lines that divide us from them. The borders in which we live play a major role in developing each of our identities, our customs or traditions, the way we conduct ourselves in business and personal endeavors. Some of us have grown up with an expectation of freedom to choose, while others depend on their government to act in their best interest. Depending on what country you call home, you either participant in a free market economy, a controlled economy, or a mixture of both. In this report we are going to look at what creates each type of economy and where we can find examples of each within the world.
First we are going to analysis the characteristic of a Free Market Economy. In a free market, the government’s role is to “make sure that the market is stable enough to, properly, conduct business” (Freidman). In purity, the system hopes to “eliminate subsidies for industries, the pre determination of prices, and the amount of regulation controlling certain industry sectors”(Freidman).
The implementation of a free market introduced individual property rights, which allows citizens to voluntarily exchange property/resources at a price arranged solely by the mutual consent of the buyer and seller. The seller is free to choose if the price being offered is worth their property; without threat of physical force, fraud, or coercion by a third party. It is for this reason that in a Market Economy, Capitalism prevails. The driving force behind a capitalist market is the entrepreneurs desire to turn a profit.
Another major characteristic of a free market is free competition. This basic rule of a fee market states that people are free to compete without interference from the government or any other outside force. This rule assumes that the best product will win over an inferior product. The rule of free competition paved the way for the theory of supply and demand, when operating within a capitalist economy.
The theory of supply and demand articulates that the supply of products and services are determined by the demand for them. This verbalizes to say that “when supplies increase, prices tend to drop. If prices drop, demand usually increases until the supplies are depleted. Once the supply is depleted the price will rise once more” (Freidman). This will continue in a cycles of ups and downs to keep the prices from getting too high or too low.
In modern times, more nations are trending towards a free market (Sorman). According to my research into political rankings across the world; Hong Kong, Singapore, Australia, Switzerland, and New Zealand, in order, are the five freest political systems in the world(Heritage House).
On the opposite side of the economic spectrum is a centrally planned economy. In a planned economy industry is owned and managed by the government. The government controls what is brought to market and what price the commodity or service will be sold for. The theory of supply & demand does not drive consumer choices. In a planned economy the government aims to provide goods and services to the masses, as opposed to turning a profit (Sen).
Historically, centrally planned economies tend to be practiced in socialist societies. Typically the government creates a five year plan for each sector and region of the country. This five year plan is broken down into short term plans to achieve goals that will robust the economic growth and increase production efficiency (Gregory). The goal of a centrally planned economy is to “allocate all resources, as planned, and utilize them and the nation’s capital, and labor in the most effective way possible”(Grossman). In turn, the economy will experience a “lower rate of unemployment, since there will be a job that uses each person’s skills and abilities to the highest capacity”(Gregory).
A major difference between a free market and a planned market is that, in a planned economy there is little to no domestic competition. This is especially true if the government owns a monopoly business in a key industry. Also, other disadvantages of a centrally planned economies are;”the lack of consumer choices and the in-efficiency of the industries”(Grossman). Often times the inefficiency of a command economy leads to the over production of one item and not enough of another item. This miss appropriation leads to costly waste.
Command economies see a low level of autonomy and are discouraged from making any decisions without consent from the commanding force. As a result there is a lack of innovation . They lack individual freedom to exercise their creativity. This often leads to repression. As of the 2014 Index of Economic Freedom, the 5 most repressed countries are Eritrea, Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Cuba, North Korea, and the Central African Republic.(Heritage House).
In-between these two drastically different economic systems sit the mixed markets. Mixed economies operate within a compromise between a classic socialism and laissez-faire capitalist philosophy. Typically, in a mixed economy individual property rights are protected (Freidman). This leaves a market economy with government oversight over key industries and public goods. A few of the key industries that are protected, in most mixed economies, are the financial, energy and communication sectors.
While businesses and corporations are free to operate they still have to follow certain laws and regulations that are set and enforced by the government. Examples of these laws are intellectual property, antitrust, environmental, and labor regulations (Rostow).
A citizen of a mixed economy is allowed to own their own property but they have to pay taxes to the government. In turn the government invests funds into state owned properties and services that promote a positive social welfare benefit to the community (Rostow). An example of community properties can be seen in American libraries, schools, water systems, hospitals and roads.
As of today there are more economic systems that operate as a mixed market, as opposed to a purely capitalist or command economy. The origins of a free market can be traced all the way back to the Babylonians who, according to Karl Moore and David Lewis, “ran big family firms that planted subsidiaries in foreign lands”(Moore). The first modern state to move towards a free market was Greece. As Moore and Lewis state, “The Greek…traders were independent, self employed, and risk takers who sailed across the Back Sea… They began to coin money and negotiate prices”(Moore).
The chart, following this essay, will give you an example of mixed markets who participate in mostly free to mostly unfree systems. The chart allows you to see where they lie on the political spectrum. When you analyze the rankings found by the Wall Street Journal and the Heritage Foundation; “Botswana, Colombia, Ireland, Japan, and the United Kingdom are considered “Mostly Free” economies; which are free markets with very little government oversight. The Dominican Republic, Mexico, the Philippines, Poland, South Africa, and Rwanda are considered “Moderately Free”. Moderately free markets operate as free markets but have a little more government regulation, than mostly free markets. From here the world’s economic scale shifts to the countries that have more regulation and government oversight. The following countries are considered “Mostly Unfree”; they are, China, Egypt, Bangladesh, Fiji Kenya, Nigeria, and Sierra Leone(Heritage House). Mostly unfree economies have a very little private sector. Instead they operate with heavy government intervention.
When analyzing the chart, that follows, I began to see a few similarities between the countries listed and their economic systems. For example countries who land on the Free half of the economic spectrum tend to have: “higher levels of political and civil rights” (Freedom House); Upper middle to high incomes (The World Bank), except for the Philippine which has a low middle income average, and they all seem to be developing human right and aiming to achieve a better quality of life(The United Nations Development Programme).
The biggest difference can be seen when evaluating the Transparency International Corruption Report and the Ease of doing or opening a business ranking, done by the World Bank. According to Transparency International the most corrupt economies in the world are the Central African Republic, North Korea, Mexico, the Philippines, the Dominican Republic, and South Africa. Three of the most corrupt nations, the Dominican Republic, South Africa and Mexico, appear to have upper- middle incomes(The World Bank); while, the Central African Republic, North Korea. Bangladesh, Kenya, and Sierra Leone have low incomes(The World Bank).
You would think that the more corrupt and harder to handle an economy is the harder it would be to open a business. According to Transparency International and the World Bank, Egypt has proven that a corrupt nation, who is difficult to conduct business with; but, has a market that is great for those who want to open a business. This trend is shared by Afghanistan, Bangladesh, and Sierra Leone, These are also the countries that lack basic human right protections and where the standards of living are much lower than the average country.
Now the exact opposite seems to be shown in Japan. Japan appears to have a low amount of corruption and a high level of ease when conducting business within markets; however, my findings tell me that opening a business in Japan would be harder than conducting business for a company (Overholt). This relationship can also be seen in the figures for Fiji and Poland. These countries have done a better job of protecting basic human rights and raising their living standards.
Many of the countries who participate in a mixed economy could be considered crony capitalist or Socialist influenced (Macey). In the 2014 Crony Capitalism Index, published by The Economist, Hong Kong, Russia, and Malaysia hold the top three crony capitalist positions. The United States and Greece have seen their fair share of cronyism too.
Cronyism spans the political spectrum from mostly free to mostly unfree nations. The United States exhibited many instances of crony capitalism before and during the Great Recession of 2007-09. In 2009 Industries who were considered too large to fail had to ask for special subsidies and tax writes offs to continue to conduct business in the American market. If you study the Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanly contribution to the Great recession you will see an example of a crony capitalist market. As Jonathan Macey puts it, “the main point is simply that as economic regulation increased and competition decreased, crony capitalism grew.”(Macey). Crony capitalism is defined as describing an economy in which success in business depends on close relationships between business people and government officials.
Aside from Crony Capitalism you also have Crony Socialist ideologies . Crony capitalism theorist believes that a business’s success depends on close relationships between them and government officials. In crony socialism states, and private companies use the power of large governments to better their position. These corporations will then bail on the free market once they have achieved a comfortable amount of success. A current example of crony socialism can be seen by researching the loan won by Joe Hynansk, who is a friend and contributor to VP Joe Biden and President Obama’s campaigns, received a $20 million loan, that is backed by the government, to build a luxury foreign auto dealership in Ukraine (Investor's Business Daily).
Now that you have a solid understand of how economic systems operate, study the chart that is attached. Do you notice any trending characteristics that I have not mentioned? Do you feel that the shift towards a free market is, as Joe Kernen of CNBC’s Squawk Box, puts it “history’s strongest force for freedom and human advancement”? This is an answer that we may not learn in my life time, but I am glad to live in a country that offers me choices.

Bibliography
Freedom House. "Freedom In The World 2014." 2014. freedomhouse.org. 5 June 2014. .
Freidman, Milton. Capitalism and Freedom. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2002.
Gregory, Valery Lazarev and Paul R. "The Wheels of a Command Economy: Allocating Soviet Vehicles." The Economic Hostory Review (2002): 324-328.
Grossman, Gregory. "Notes doe a Theory of the Command Economy." University of Glasgow (1963): 101-123.
Heritage House. "2014 Index of Economic Freedom." 2014. Heritage.org. June 2014. .
Investor's Business Daily. "Crony Socialism is Still With Us." 20 August 2012. Investors.com. 10 June 2014. .
Macey, Johnathan R. "Crony Capitalism: Right Here, Right Now." Harvard JLPP (n.d.).
Moore, Karl & Lewis, David. "What can ancient economics teach us?; The mixed economy, by trial and error, has become the natural order of human society." The Vancouver Sun (British Columbia) (2009): A9.
Overholt, William H. "Japan's Economy, at War with itself." Foreign Affairs (2002): 134-147.
Rostow, Eugene V. "The State and the Rule of Law in a Mixed Economy ." Columbia Law Review Vol. 72, No. 4 (1972): 788-792.
Sen, S.R. "Command Economy and Market Economy." Economics & Political weekly (1991): 549+551-552.
Sorman, Guy. "Le Free Market." The Wall Street Journal, Eastern edition (2003): A.12.
"Squawking in Defense of Capitalism." Daily News: New York's Hometown Newspsper (2011): 29.
The United Nations Development Programme. Human Development Index (HDI). 2013. 11 June 2014. .
The World Bank. "World Development Indicators." 2014. Worldbank.org. June 2014. .
Transparency International. "Corruption Perception Index 2013." 2013. transparency.org. June 2014. .
World Bank. "Doing Business Measuring Business Regulations." 2013. doingbusiness.org. June 2014. .

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Capitalism vs Socialism

...Capitalism vs. Socialism. “The US is a capitalist there corporations can sue and be sued. They can buy and sell property. They can perform many of the same actions as individuals. A capitalist system is a free market economy or free enterprise.” Belgium is socialism everyone works for wealth that is, in turn, circulated to everyone. Capitalism you work for your own wealth. A socialist economic system operates on the foundation that what is good for one is good for all. Everyone works for their own good and the good of everyone else. The government decides how wealth is spread among the people.” “In a socialist economy, there is no market as such. The government provides for the people. The taxes are usually higher than in a capitalist system. There may be government-run health care and a complete system of government-operated education.” “Capitalism increases the opportunities in the marketplace for personal economic growth. It increases opportunities for entrepreneurs to increase their personal wealth and for societies to grow as well. Hard work is rewarded under a capitalist economy “Socialism seeks to promote equality among people by providing them with many of the same social benefits. Examples of benefits that individuals in a socialist society are provided are educational, health care, and care for the elderly. Socialism means paying for things without necessarily expecting a financial return.” “Consumers and companies control the free market in the US.“ I would rather...

Words: 271 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Controversy: Socialism Vs Capitalism

...There has been much controversy concerning the topic of socialism vs. capitalism. Each have unique and important characteristics that can be beneficial to a society. Therefore, neither the extremes of capitalism nor socialism would be the best path to tread for an economy. Each system has it's on variety of "good" and "bad" for the people and their governments. And both good parts of these systems can be used symbiotically to create a thriving economy. A capitalist system has many benefits, but if used in an extreme way, can ultimately bring much destruction. Capitalism grew during the industrial revolution. Businesses grew, prices lowered, and things were made my readily available through factory production. With this great amount of growth...

Words: 410 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Capitalism vs. Socialism

...Capitalism and Socialism are both economic systems and are used in different societies throughout the world. Even though both of these systems are implemented, they do have some similarities between them, but are also different in many aspects. Capitalism and Socialism may work for certain societies, but both have shortcomings and criticisms that come along with them. Despite the views of both Capitalism and Socialism, both economic systems have merged features from one another. When comparing Capitalism and Socialism, they both have three essential components (although the components of each are different). Both require a strong government support to survive. They also have strong control over the general population of the world. The main comparison between the two of them is that both retain property and the means of production, but both in different forms. Contrasting Capitalism and Socialism, components of Capitalism are that private individuals own the means of production; they market to compete with each other and the individual decides what to produce, how much to produce and what price to sell items at; and the pursuit of profit, private owners decide what the products should cost for receiving a profit. With Socialism, the public or government owns the means of production; the government forms a committee to determine how many items will be produced, the cost, what factories will make them, and where the product is going to be sold; and there is no motive for making...

Words: 710 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Capitalism and Invisible Hand

...Capitalism & the Invisible Hand Throughout the history of civilization have been two forms of social administrations: Individualism which has taken the form of capitalism and collectivism which has taken many different forms, each form different from one another, such as socialism, communism, nazism, and etc. Capitalism is an economic system in which most of the means of production and distribution, such as businesses or factories, are not owned by the government but by the private individuals who operate them for profits. (“13b. Comparing Economic Systems.”) In the center of the free-market capitalism is the individual who has four basic rights: • The right to own private property. • The right to own a business and to keep the profits made by operating his business. • The right to freedom of competition. • The right of freedom of choice. (Nickels, Understanding Business) On the other hand, socialism is an economic system that calls for putting most of the means of production in the hands of government which will share the wealth and income more equally among people.( Nickels, Understanding Business) The main goal of socialism is to narrow the gap between the rich and the poor. Thus, the government has the responsibility to evenly distribute the wealth in order to make the society just and fair. (“13b. Comparing Economic Systems.”) An individual attempts to become wealthy, which explains why his focus is only on profits, but to achieve this goal he has to exchange...

Words: 974 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Socialism vs.Capitalism

...Miranda Collins Dr. Jeff Kersh English 1010 March 10, 2016 Bernie vs Trump: A Contrast and Comparison of Capitalism and Socialism Getting the right ideas of how an economy should be run is a significant challenge. However, two systems can be used: socialism or capitalism. The United States continues to face this challenge. The current presidential campaign illustrates this important issue. Two candidates exemplify the two economic ideologies. Bernie Sanders adheres to the idea of democratic socialism, while Donald Trump follows capitalism. Capitalism is seen as a system that is mostly based on entrepreneurship, market allocation, and private ownership (Friedman 15). Socialism, on the other hand, is a structure where the control of factors of production is moved from individuals to the state. In light of these issues, below is a comparison and contrast between capitalism and socialism. While socialism helps to even out and equally distribute wealth in the society so that no particular person has control over production except the government, Capitalism does not allow for an evening out, and equal distribution of resources in the society. Also, the government has no control over production. According to Walter (7), Capitalism is “the economic system under which the ownership of goods and services are privately owned, and decisions concerning pricing, investments, and distribution are determined in a free-market system, primarily on the basis of competition among businesses”...

Words: 1148 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Rivers in America

...October 18, 2013 Socialism vs. Capitalism Contemporary History Professor Quincy Harris Capitalism and Socialism are two different types of systems. There lies a huge difference between the beliefs of both. I plan to discuss the differences of each and discuss the pros and cons of both as well as discuss which would be better for Americans. Sometime between 16th and 19th century capitalism first appeared. Once Feudalism failed Capitalism became the stronger system used in the western world. During the time of the Industrial Revolution Capitalism spread throughout the world. In order to become an industrialized nation then Capitalism had to be embraced. Socialism’s movement was started by Karl Marx (intellectual advocate.) Socialism is an economic system characterized by social ownership of the production and co-operative management of the economy. Socialism first appeared during the 19th century. According to (Historyworld.net).The essential characteristics of capitalism only become evident with an increase in scale in two quite separate contexts. One is the formation of joint-stock companies, in which investors pool their resources for a major commercial undertaking. The other, not evident until the Industrial Revolution, is the development of factories in which large numbers of workers are employed in a single private enterprise. Speculative trading enterprises in the Middle Ages are undertaken by individual merchants, operating in family groups or partnerships but...

Words: 1747 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Campbell Ewald

...Assignment On Capitalism Program: M.com (2)years Smester: 3rd (Evening) TABLE OF CONTENTS · Introduction Of Capitalism. · Capitalism vs Socialism. · Capitalism vs Communism. · Types Of Capitalism. · Advantages Of Capitalism. · Disadvantages Of Capitalism. · Criticism On Capitalism. CAPITALISM An economic system in which investment in and ownership of the means of production, distribution, and exchange of wealth is made and maintained chiefly by private individuals or corporations, especially as contrasted to cooperatively or state-owned means of wealth. It is easy to forget that capitalism was coined not so long ago, in the mid-19th century, when the Industrial Revolution was in full swing, and individual entrepreneurs were creating new industries and amassing wealth. Terms for the other two major competing economic systems of the past two centuries— socialism and communism—were also coined around the same time. Also, about the same time it became common to designate all such coinages as “isms”: terms formed by adding the suffix -ism to a root word in order to expand its meaning to encompass a related system, theory, or practice. Thus from a fairly old word, capital, the relatively newer word, capitalism, was formed to describe the then emerging economies of the West. On the surface, the meaning of capitalism seems straightforward, referring to an economic system in which private individuals, rather than governments...

Words: 2595 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

Capitalist vs. Socialist

...The difference between capitalisms and socialism is the extent that the government interferes with the financial countries growth of the society. Under capitalism, private citizens can own their own business with limited government interference. Under socialism, the government owns all businesses. Socialist believes that private citizens should share the wealth of the financial growth to equalize out the gap between the wealthy and the poor. Capitalist Society vs. Socialist Society Does one live in a country where they can have the opportunity to have personal wealth or live in a country where the government makes all the decisions? In Belgium, the socialist system believes that everyone should have equal equality; the government does not permit much freedom when it comes to the economy because it controls all forms of capital. Living in a capitalistic country everyone is concentrating on their own personal wealth and success, Socialism is concentrating on society as a whole. Concentrating on a society as a whole can impair society by putting hard working people in the same financial group as the non-hard working people. The same person working hard in the United States can secure success and wealth. In Belgium, that same person is not able to profit from his success or wealth because he has to give his earnings to the government. Julie, who lives in the United States, might try to persuade Jean-Paul that moving to the U.S. would be more beneficial to his overall...

Words: 458 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Revisionist Socialism

...Revisionist Socialism What is it? Revisionist socialism seeks to reform or tame capitalism rather than abolish it. 
It seeks to reconcile socialism with capitalism. It seeks social justice in the sense of narrowing the economic and social inequalities (to varying degrees) within capitalism through welfare and redistribution. Social democracy is the most obvious example of revisionist socialism. Revisionists are invariably parliamentary, not revolutionary, socialists. Bernstien Beginning in the late 1890s a diverse group of so-called revisionist thinkers increasingly questioned the validity of a number of fundamental Marxist theorists. They particularly objected to how rigidly Marx's doctrine was being interpreted by his colleagues in Second International. The foremost theoretical spokesman of the revisionist movement was Eduard Bernstein. Bernstein was a German social democrat whose views on socialism had been influenced by his extended influenced by those in Switzerland and particularly in England, where he became familiar with the views of the early Fabian Society. While his own theory of socialism differed from theirs, Bernstein nevertheless shared many of the Fabian beliefs, including the notion that socialism could be achieved by non-revolutionary means. In a series of articles that first appeared in Die Neue Zeit between 1896 and 1899 and later published in the book Evolutionary Socialism (1899), Bernstein laid the foundation for a revisionist challenge to Marxist...

Words: 1073 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Capitalism

...Capitalism vs. socialism: the great debate revislted October 11 Civics CHV2D1-02 Capitalism versus socialism : the great debate revislted Page1 -debate between two isms, soicalism and capitalism are far from over. -International agencies porvide hard evidenceto discuss these 2 isms -comparisons between before and after the important events of capitalism in Europe and comparison of excommunist countries provide us with enough fact which provides us with definate conclusions -Under communism ->economic decisons/property owned by national/publicly -over the past 15 years of the transition to capitalism-> basic industries taken over by European/Us corporations and by mafia billionaires or have been shut down -In bulgaria, Rumania and some other countries, their average capita growth over the past 15 years -> far below compared to 15 years under communism. -In Armenia, the number of scientific researchers -> 20000 to 5000 in 5 years(1990-1995) Page2 -By the mid 1990s, over 50% of population lived in poverty,homelessness in Russia(Capitalist). Economy = privatized ->taken over by russian gangsters (which was led by billinaire). -the transition to capitalism in russia led to over 15million premature deaths (which would not have happened if they remained as socialism). -intro of capitalism has weaken the system of public health ->caused death/ infectious disease -The big contributor to the AIDS ->russian criminal gangs (trade in heroin and...

Words: 366 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Captaism/Socialism

...Erica Anguiano Socialism vs. Capitalism December 21st, 2014 Socialism vs. Capitalism Socialist is not state presidency. It does not law over individuals and places, but it could inspire us citizens to decree over things. Socialism signifies a government in which the society together own and constitutionally function the businesses and social services through a financial fairness and the things required to create and issue households, automobiles and all the necessities we need and want. In socialism the workers who control the businesses and services work together. Owning shops and other workplaces. Rankings would designate our direct managers and organization groups and also elect reps to local and national meetings of the business or service. Work with all- manufacturing congress to organize and distribute of all goods and amenities through the nation. Socialism would replace the biased government that is ran by representatives of an industrialized government operated by workers. Instead in its place of a representative from California or New York, there would be employee representatives from the motorized industry, from the transport systems, from the mines, from the clothes factories, from services such as diners, hospices, schools and so on. These representatives would have the single duty of determining what should be manufactured and how best to manufacture it. Today we have political equality only. Labors don’t have economic democracy. The owners...

Words: 623 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Social Theories

...In a way, communism is an extreme form of socialism. Many countries have dominant socialist political parties but very few are truly communist. In fact, most countries - including staunch capitalist bastions like the U.S. and U.K. - have government programs that borrow from socialist principles. "Socialism" is sometimes used interchangeably with "communism" but the two philosophies have some stark differences. Most notably, while communism is a political system, socialism is primarily an economic system that can exist in various forms under a wide range of political systems. Comparison chart | |Communism |Socialism | |Philosophy |From each according to his ability, to each according to |From each according to his ability, to each according to| | |his needs. Free-access to the articles of consumption is |his contribution. Emphasis on profit being distributed | | |made possible by advances in technology that allow for |among the society or workforce to complement individual | | |super-abundance. |wages/salaries. | |Economic System |The means of production are held in common, negating the |The means of production are owned by public enterprises | | |concept of ownership in...

Words: 3092 - Pages: 13

Premium Essay

Market System

...that America is truly run from the government and we have no choice; but, compared to other countries, America has a lot of freedom when it comes to the rights of the individuals. The economic system that the United States uses is capitalism. Capitalism is the economic system that is also known as the free market system, and is based off on private ownership, economic freedom, and fair competition. Other countries, however, use socialism as their economic system. Socialism is based on the principle that the government should operate some of the key enterprises that affect the welfare of the public. Finally, some countries choose to use communism as their economic system. Communism is based off of the principle that the government should operate and direct almost all enterprises. Clearly, these three economic systems are very different in the way that they operate. In this paper, I am going to compare and contrast the three types of economic systems: capitalism, socialism, and communism. Capitalism, also known as the free market system, is the economic system used by the United States. Because of capitalism, we have what are called fundamental rights. Fundamental rights are rights that the people have because of living in a capitalist economy. Capitalism gives the right to own a business and to keep the profits that are earned after taxes have been taken out. This means that if you earn money from a business, you get to keep it after you are taxed by the government. Obviously,...

Words: 2014 - Pages: 9

Free Essay

Types of Economic Systems.

...Types of Economic Systems. Socialism Socialist economic systems (all of which feature common ownership of the means of production) can be subdivided by their coordinating mechanism (planning and markets) into planned socialist and market socialist systems. Additionally, socialism can be divided based on the ownership of the means of production into those that are based on public ownership, worker or consumer cooperatives and common ownership (i.e., non-ownership). Communism is a hypothetical stage of Socialist development articulated by Marx as "second stage Socialism" in Critique of the Gotha Program, whereby economic output is distributed based on need and not simply on the basis of labor contribution. The primary concern for socialist planned economies is to coordinate production to directly perceived satisfy human needs/economic demand (as opposed to generate profit and satisfy needs as a byproduct of pursuing profit), to advance the productive forces of the economy while being immune to the perceived systemic inefficiencies (cyclical processes) and crisis of overproduction so that production would be subject to the needs of society as opposed to being ordered around "capital accumulation".[7][8] Capitalism Capitalism generally features the private ownership of the means of production (capital), and a market economy for coordination. Corporate capitalism refers to a capitalist marketplace characterized by the dominance of hierarchical, bureaucratic corporations. Mercantilism...

Words: 379 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

My Papers

...| Capitalism vs. Socialism during the 1920’s | Diamond Jackson | | History II Dr. Hilton | | | Upton Sinclairs’ The Jungle is a common form of muckraking during the 20’s. The book is about a Lithuanian family who relocated to the US in hopes of finding success and building better lives. After hearing the story of how America supports the idea of freedom, and has unlimited opportunity, the main character Jurgis is convinced America was the place to be. Once arriving to America and coming in contact with the reality of the myth of his ideal society, Jurgis exposes the deeply rooted capitalism and the effects and problems that it causes. Because of this, Sinclair feels that socialism is the remedy to the capitalistic conditions he’s now a part of. Andrew Carnegies’ The Gospel of Wealth is a viewpoint of how beneficial capitalism is to American society and economy which is seen through the eyes of a high-class businessperson. Carnegie discusses the history of there being an equal society, the natural law of competition, and the capitalistic results and benefits. Sinclairs’ The Jungle and Carnegies’ The Gospel of Wealth are opposing viewpoints, therefore when it comes to the unequal distribution of wealth and ideas about capitalism and socialism both arguments are supportive and reasonable to a certain extent. In the 1920’s, the unequal distribution of wealth is evident and Americans start to see many cultural changes. America has now adopted the idea of...

Words: 1067 - Pages: 5