Free Essay

Speech on Religion

In: English and Literature

Submitted By blaine
Words 2615
Pages 11
The ethical issue I will be discussing is IVF, in relation to the Christian religions Catholic and Anglican.

IVF is used in cases of infertility –where the woman’s fallopian tubes are absent or blocked, the men’s sperm count is low, or the couple’s infertility is unexplained. It is an assisted reproductive technology in which one or more eggs are fertilized outside a female’s body. To do this, eggs are collected from the ovaries and placed in a dish with a large number of sperm for approx. 18 hours. The eggs are then placed in a special growth medium which allows fertilization to occur.
Afterwards the embryo is either transferred back into the woman’s uterus or frozen and stored for later use.

IVF has been a source of moral, ethical and religious controversy since its development. Although members of all religious groups can be found on both sides of the issue, the major opposition has come from the Roman Catholic Church. In 1987, the church issued a doctrinal statement opposing IVF on 3 grounds; the destruction of human embryos not used for implantation, the possibility of IVF by a sperm donor other than the husband-thus removing reproduction form the marital context, and finally the severing of an essential connection between the nuptial act and procreation. The use of IVF is said to violate the delicate innocence of those created, as God, their creator has not given them the gift of life, and therefore the fundamental value of life has been lost.

Catholics believe it is immoral to produce human embryos destined to be exploited as disposable biological material. In the usual practice of IVF, not all embryos are transferred to the woman’s body; some are destroyed. By acting in this way, the scientist is said to take the place of God. Even though he may be unaware of this, he sets himself up as the master of others destiny, by way of arbitrarily choosing whom he will allow to live and who will die, resulting in the death of defenseless humans.

The Catholic religion believe that these embryos are not potential life-instead they are life with vast potential. The church bases its views on the belief that human life begins at contraception, not implantation. They believe that there is a continuum from conception to the death of a person, and that both physical and spiritual development occurs at all stages of life. This belief emphasizes the sanctity of conception as the initial stage of development, which in turn, makes the process of IVF immoral.

Catholics also believe that IVF contradicts the sacred unity of marriage and the child’s right to be conceived and brought into the world in and from marriage. Therefore, IVF with sperm from a man or woman other than the husband, or an ovum not from the wife, in the
Catholics view, is morally illicit.

Anglicans, on the other hand, allow contraception and therefore don’t believe in the sacredness of the inseparable acts of union and procreation. In the case of IVF, procreation is also separated from the act of intercourse. So, in theory Anglicans approve of the use of
IVF within married couples.

However, since the discovery that the IVF procedure is bound up with embryo research and the disposal of unused embryos, Anglicans stance on IVF has changed. Morally, in the process of IVF, you are breaking the 6th commandment “thou shall not kill”. So, in a document published in 1985, Anglicans have condemned the use of IVF, on the grounds that it is an unacceptable form of treatment of nascent human life.

Christians base their views on controversial moral issues using different sources of ethical authority. These sources include the
Bible, Papal encyclicals, the Catholic catechism and church councils.

The main underlying ethical concepts from the Bible are derived from the unity and holiness of God. The 10 commandments, which appears in the Old Testament, describes the expectations of Gods own people.
These expectations have become an important statement of ethical behaviour, focusing on the worship of God and respect for other people. As a result of deliberately taking an innocent life through
IVF, many people don’t realize they are in fact breaking the 6th commandment “thou shall not kill.” As the Christian church believes that life is sacred from conception, the destruction of embryos constitutes in the loss of human lives.

Also, the New Testament states that al moral rules follow from the duty to love God, yourself and others equally. The New Testament outlines the way of life expected of followers of Jesus in much more simpler terms.

As well as the Bible, Christians use the Papal encyclicals for guidance. In the encyclical letter Humanae Vitae, issued by Pope Paul
6th in 1968, it was stated that union and procreation are 2 inseparable acts. It states “By safeguarding both these essential aspects, the unitive and the procreative, the conjugal act preserves in its fullness the sense of true mutual love and its ordination towards man's most high calling to parenthood.” This statement contradicts the very essence of the IVF procedure, regarding it as unethical and immoral.

As well as this, many Christians derive their ethical views from the
Catholic catechism which damns all IVF treatment as venturing into the realm of immorality. It condemns IVF on the ground that it infringes on the child’s right to be born to a father and mother known to him and bound to each other by marriage. The catechism also opposes IVF because it entrusts the life and identity of the embryo into the power of doctors and scientists and establishes the domination of technology over the origin and destiny of the human person.

These various sources of ethical authority are derived from the ethical writings and teachings of Jesus Christ, the founder of
Christianity.

In a media release from the Christian Democratic Party issued on the 3rd of August 2000, it supported a ban on IVF for single women. The party believes in the fundamental right of children to grow up in a family with its natural mother and father. This view supports my findings on the immorality of IVF.

In conclusion, it can be seen form the information gathered, the stance of both Catholics and Anglicans against IVF. These Christian variants believe the IVF procedure is both morally and ethically illicit, based on heir sources of ethical authority.

Religion Report

Fundamental Christian values reflect the position taken by the church on ethical and moral issues. In the above statement, fundamental
Christian values are defined as people’s essential or principal feelings and attitudes towards things that are important to them.
Ethical and moral issues are defined as debates which relate to principles of right and wrong. I believe this statement is an accurate way of describing the ethical and moral teachings of Christianity.

Christian values are viewed as the values which are based on the life and teachings of Jesus as expressed in the Bible. One of the major
Christian values is the sanctity of life. The message of the great teachers of all the worlds’ religions is that the universe and everything in it is divine. The Christian religion especially, is taught the reverence (great respect and admiration) of life. Another major Christian value is love, expressed in the commandment “love one another as I have loved you”. Apart from love, this commandment also relates to the respect and acceptance of every individual. Jesus taught that everyone is special and has a purpose on earth. This view is one that is held highly for the Christian religion.

One of the main ethical issues which cause a great deal of conflict in society is In Vitro Fertilization (IVF). IVF is an assisted reproductive technology which is used in cases of infertility. In this procedure one or more eggs are fertilized outside a female’s body. To do this, eggs are collected from the ovaries and placed in a dish with a large number of sperm for approximately 18 hours. The eggs are then placed in a special growth medium which allows fertilization to occur.
Afterwards, the embryo is either transferred back into the woman’s uterus, or frozen and stored for later use (usually scientifically).

Christians are against the use of IVF on the grounds that it is immoral to produce human embryos destined to be exploited as disposable biological material. However the Roman Catholic church has shown the strongest opposition to IVF, issuing a doctrinal statement in 1987 opposing IVF on 3 grounds; the destruction of human embryos not used for implantation, the possibility of IVF by a sperm donor other than the husband (therefore removing reproduction from the marital context), and finally the severing of an essential connection between the nuptial act and procreation. The Christian response to IVF comes from many different sources of ethical authority. However the main underlying ethical concepts come from the Bible. As a result of deliberately taking an innocent human life, many people don’t realize they are I fact breaking the 6th commandment “thou shall not kill”. As the Christian church believes that life is sacred from conception, the destruction of embryos constitutes in the loss of human lives.

Other sources of ethical authority for Catholics are papal encyclicals and the catholic catechism. In the encyclical letter Humanae Vitae, issued by Pope Paul VI in 1968 (footnotes no1.) he states that union and procreation are 2 inseparable acts. In saying this, IVF is deemed as unethical and immoral, as in the IVF procedure the conjugal act is separated from the procreative.

The Catholic catechism also describes IVF treatment as “venturing into the realm of immorality”. The catechism opposes IVF on the grounds that it entrusts the life and the identity of the embryo into the power of scientists and establishes the domination of technology over the origin and destiny of the human person.

The stance taken by the Christian church relating to IVF is determined by its fundamental Christian values. As Christian values are established through the life and teachings of Jesus and the sources of ethical authority also base their statements on the life and teachings of Jesus, the 2 are interrelated. The major Christian value is the sanctity of human life, which is expressed most thoroughly in the
Bible, papal encyclicals and the catholic catechism. Without the fundamental Christian values, the Christian church would not be able to determine a position on controversial ethical and moral issues such as IVF.

Abortion is also another extremely controversial ethical issue relating to the Christian church. Abortion is a medical procedure that terminates pregnancy by removing the implanted fetus before it can survive outside the uterus. Vacuum aspiration is the most common abortion procedure. A thin flexible tube is inserted into the vagina, through the cervix and into the womb. It is attached to a suction machine at the other end which draws out the contents of the uterus, taking the fetus with it.

Christians believe abortion is unethical on the grounds that the fetus is a living person from the moment of conception. Therefore, abortion is seen as the murder of an innocent defenseless human. The embryonic child has an equal right to life with its mother, and therefore neither the mother nor medical practitioner lawfully has the right to take that life away. In the Catholic Church, abortion was condemned in
1895 in the statement “it cannot be safely taught in Catholic schools that it is lawful to perform…any surgical operation which is directly destructive of the life of the fetus or the mother.”

The reason for the Christians stance on abortion comes from its sources of ethical authority. As was the case with IVF, the church opposes abortion primarily from the life and teachings of Jesus through the Bible. The Bible states that every human life is special, unique and has a specific purpose. The taking of an innocent life through abortion directly breaks the 6th commandment “thou shall not kill”. Also, the opposition of abortion is seen in the Catholic papal encyclical Humanae Vitae (footnotes no.2) which state that abortion is an illicit way of regulating birth. It also claims that when the generative process has already begun, it is an unacceptable form of evil to terminate the pregnancy by means of abortion.

It is evident by the stance of the Christian church against abortion, that their views have been derived from fundamental Christian values.
These Christian values-such as the sanctity of life and love, form the basis of the churches views, as the churches stance on abortion would not be formed if it weren’t for the basic teachings of Jesus.

In conclusion, it can be seen from the following essay that fundamental Christian values do, in fact, reflect the position taken by the church on ethical and moral issues such as IVF and abortion.

Footnotes

HUMANAE VITAE

Encyclical Letter of His Holiness Pope Paul VI on Human Life Issued
July 25, 1968

Two Inseparable Aspects: Union and Procreation

1. That teaching, often set forth by the magisterium, is founded upon the inseparable connection, willed by God and unable to be broken by man on his own initiative, between the two meanings of the conjugal act: the unitive meaning and the procreative meaning. Indeed, by its intimate structure, the conjugal act, while most closely uniting husband and wife, capacitates them for the generation of new lives, according to laws inscribed in the very being of man and of woman. By safeguarding both these essential aspects, the unitive and the procreative, the conjugal act preserves in its fullness the sense of true mutual love and its ordination towards man's most high calling to parenthood. We believe that the men of our day are particularly capable of seeing the deeply reasonable and human character of this fundamental principle.

Illicit Ways of Regulating Birth
--------------------------------

2. In conformity with these landmarks in the human and Christian vision of marriage, we must once again declare that the direct interruption of the generative process already begun, and, above all, directly willed and procured abortion, even if for therapeutic reasons, are to be absolutely excluded as licit means of regulating birth. Equally to be excluded, as the teaching authority of the Church has frequently declared, is direct sterilization, whether perpetual or temporary, whether of the man or of the woman. Similarly excluded is every action which, either in anticipation of the conjugal act, or in its accomplishment, or in the development of its natural consequences, proposes, whether as an end or as a means, to render procreation impossible. To justify conjugal acts made intentionally in fecund, one cannot invoke as valid reasons the lesser evil, or the fact that such acts would constitute a whole together with the fecund acts already performed or to follow later and hence would share in one and the same moral goodness. In truth, if it is sometimes licit to tolerate a lesser evil in order to avoid a greater evil or to promote a greater good it is not licit, even for the gravest reasons, to do evil so that good may follow there from; that is, to make into the object of a positive act of the will something which is intrinsically disorder, and hence unworthy of the human person, even when the intention is to safeguard or promote individual, family or social well-being.
Consequently it is an error to think that a conjugal act which is deliberately made in fecund and so is intrinsically dishonest could be made honest and right by the ensemble of a fecund conjugal life.

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Nelseon

...but he also wanted absolute control as an emperor and limited many things that were established during the revolution such as women's rights and freedom of speech. With the Napoleonic Code, he favored order and authority rather than individual rights that the revolution supported. Napoleon also introduced religion back and rekindled the relationship between church and state.apoleon was more of a rejection of the completion of the revolution because he did keep a little of the revolution such as property rights, but he also wanted absolute control as an emperor and limited many things that were established during the revolution such as women's rights and freedom of speech. With the Napoleonic Code, he favored order and authority rather than individual rights that the revolution supported. Napoleon also introduced religion back and rekindled the relationship between church and state.apoleon was more of a rejection of the completion of the revolution because he did keep a little of the revolution such as property rights, but he also wanted absolute control as an emperor and limited many things that were established during the revolution such as women's rights and freedom of speech. With the Napoleonic Code, he favored order and authority rather than individual rights that the revolution supported. Napoleon also introduced religion back and rekindled the relationship between church and state.apoleon was more of a rejection of the completion of the revolution because he did keep a little...

Words: 1313 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Freedom of Speech

...With unreliable views and values, our culture needs to have unrestricted freedom to speak in relation to whichever and all that alarms us in array to constantly develop our culture. Individual free speech inconsistency would be words that create a constructive, and not pessimistic, picture in mutually long-terms and short-terms. Dictionary.com classifies Freedom of Speech as, “the right of people to express their opinions publicly without governmental interference, subject to the laws against libel, incitement to violence or rebellion, etc.” Freedom of speech is also known as free speech or freedom of expression. Freedom of speech is also known as freedom of expression because a person’s beliefs and thoughts can also be expressed in other ways other than speech. These ways could be art, writings, songs, and other forms of expression. If speaking freely and expressing ourselves freely is supposed to be without any consequence, then why are there constant law suits and consequences for people who do. Freedom of speech and freedom of expression should be exactly what they mean. Although most people believe that they can speak about anything without there being consequences, this is very untrue. One of those spoken things that have consequences is speaking about the president in such a negative way that it sends red flags about your intentions. Because of the high terrorist alerts, people have to limit what they say about bombs, 9/11, and anything they may say out of anger about...

Words: 1993 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Economic Disparity In Colonial America

...When many British settlers came to the new world, they were searching for the myths associated with that land. These myths commonly fell along the rights and freedoms that had been restricted in England. Along with restrictions on rights, the economic situation in England was dreadful. The masses of poor became homeless and jobless. Such restrictions on rights, like freedom of speech and freedom of religion, along with the obvious disparage between the rich and the poor, caused enough discontempt for masses of people to leave the nation in search for something better. These people heard the myths of the new world, being a land where anyone could become rich and free, and instinctively immigrated. These people, being influenced by the myths...

Words: 1387 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Examples Of Freedom Of Speech

...Freedom of Religion, Speech and the Press The first amendment is part of the United States Constitution in a short portion called the United States Bill of Rights. The Bill of Rights is one of the high laws of our land. “It guarantees that the United States government can never deprive people in the United States of certain fundamental rights,” according to aclu.org. The first amendment states that “congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof: or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press: or the right of the people peaceably to assemble and to petition the government for a redress of grievances,” according to nccs.net. This means that us as Americans have the right to...

Words: 1089 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Reflect First Amendment

...to address three fundamental liberties all citizens have: religion, speech and peaceful assembly. On closer inspection, there are six very different ideals melded together into one defining statement. When the U.S. Constitution was signed on Sept. 17, 1787, it did not contain important freedoms that are now outlined in the Bill of Rights, because many of the Framers viewed some of the freedoms as unnecessary. However, after vigorous debate, the Bill of Rights was adopted. The first freedoms guaranteed in this historic document were expressed in 45 words written by James Madison that we have come to know as the First Amendment. The First Amendment states that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” Freedom of expression, artistic or otherwise in the United States is governed by the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Without a doubt the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution is one of the most important rights afforded to us as Americans. Our freedom of expression and right to freedom of religion from government interference is protected by the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. Freedom of expression consists of the right to freedom of speech, press, and to petition the government for a...

Words: 2203 - Pages: 9

Free Essay

Nick

...Hi The articles "Freedom of Speech: Missouri Knights of the Ku Klux Klan v. Kansas City" and "Freedom of Religion: Lyng v. Northwest Indian Cemetery Protective Association" both engage in conflicts pertaining to the First Amendment in the Bill of Rights.  "Freedom of Speech: Missouri Knights of the Ku Klux Klan v. Kansas City" is an article about the KKK's attempt to spread their beliefs through a public access cable television channel. Dennis Mahon and Allan Moran, both of the KKK, asked to be broadcasted on air in 1987, and the whole situation led to a major problem. The KKK is known for its killings, prejudice, and cross burnings, and they wanted to be shown on television to further spread their message. The First Amendment states the right to the freedom of speech, but many of the community members had a problem with the whole situation. People with race relations, local leaders, and members of the cable company did not want to grant the KKK the right to appear on air. Black ministers and important politicians were not happy with the KKK's request to voice their opinions. The KKK complied with all of the rules that were presented by the cable company, even when they were told to create a locally produced show and receive training in video production. They happily obeyed the regulations and didn't cause additional problems to what they were soon to face. The cable company studio was located in a neighborhood that was 95% black, and violence was a major concern for the cable...

Words: 8654 - Pages: 35

Premium Essay

The First Amendment

...went into effect in the year of 1791, but up until that people did not have the rights to religion, speech, press, assembly, and petition. The first amendment is arguably the most important part of the Bill of Rights due to its meaning, purpose, and lasting impact on the U.S. The first amendment is meaningful and purposeful in many ways. The first amendment states, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom...

Words: 722 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Audience Analysis

...into consideration regarding my speech on separation of Church and State. The three psychographics that are important are, the audiences, attitudes, values and beliefs. Not only do I need to take into account these three, I must also acknowledge the importance of the demographic variables. These will be, the audiences, education, age and religious association. Analyze In every speech, the audience’s psychographics are very important. I do not know for certain what exactly their attitudes, values and beliefs are. However, considering that %80 of Americans are known to be religious or religiously affiliated, I must assume that most if not all are identify with one religion or another. Religion is a very sensitive topic to talk about as emotions can run high and beliefs are deeply rooted in the psychosis of religious folk. Taking this into account I must approach this topic with utmost sensitivity so as not to thwart peace or possibly ignite controversy. Steps in my speech will include portraying religion in its positive light and on the other hand examining the goodness of lawful state. How the two strenghthen each other but why they shouldn't have any affect on one another is my main point. Stressing the point that religion by itself is a blessing and State by itself is the only way to live yet the two crossing paths only leads to disorientation and distortion of both these great humanized foundations. Adapt I have adapted my speech to the possible variety of religious...

Words: 466 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Freedom Of Speech Essay

...right to freedom of speech was given to all of them. Without this right the participants would not have been able to express their opinion on the political state of affairs in Athens. This would make Athens less of a democracy and more of an autocracy, ruled by either one or several of the same ideologies. (Smith, D., & Torres, L. (2006)) An important figure in the...

Words: 3812 - Pages: 16

Premium Essay

The First Amendment

...believe that the First Amendment was written as a means of protecting the church from the state. The First Amendment is considered the most important amendment in the United States Constitution. It protects the rights to freedom of religion, freedom of expression, freedom of speech, freedom of assembly, and freedom of press from government interference. [1] According to J. Hutson in his book the “Church and State in America”, he states the amendment “prevented the federal government from establishing a national religion and allowed people to freely exercise their religious beliefs and practices.”[2] Basically, the First Amendment gives the people the ability to live their lives the way that they want to, the lifestyle that they choose. This amendment was passed 1789. James Madison, known as the “Father of the Constitution” for his contribution to the Constitution, and proposed twelve amendments, which ended up becoming the first ten amendments of the Constitution. These first ten amendments make up what became known as the Bill of Rights. [3] The purpose of the First Amendment of the Bill of Rights, written mostly by James Madison, with the assistance of Thomas Jefferson, was to address three fundamental freedoms all citizens have: religion, speech and peaceful assembly. According to the Buchanan (2010), when the U.S. Constitution was signed, it did not contain the essential freedoms now outlined in the Bill of Rights, because many of the Framers viewed their inclusion as unnecessary...

Words: 687 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Sinners In The Hands Of An Angry God Speech

...Since the beginning of religious theories, religion has had a huge impact on how leaders ran their communities, cities, or even countries. Some use religion to hold fear over the heads of society members; however, it is often also used as a source of hope. Jonathan Edwards’s Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God speech and Patrick Henry’s “Speech to the Virginia Convention” have many differences in the way the speakers portray religion to their advantage, and striking similarities in how they use religious views to persuade their audience. Edwards begins his speech by explaining God’s wrath, and how all Christians are held in the “hand” of God over the pit of hell. From the beginning of his speech, he uses this imagery to instill the fear of burning in hell eternally. Edwards then continues to add panic within the audience as he conveys that “The devil is waiting for them, hell gaping for them, the flames gather and flash about them and would swallow them up” (5-7). The usage of imagery pushes these...

Words: 502 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Constitutional Law and Criminal Law

...Chapter 5 The U.S. Constitution sets the framework for the U.S. government, establishing a system of government that divides power between the federal government and the states It establishes a system of government based on the principle of federalism, where power is divided between a central authority and constituent political units The 10th Amendment to the Constitution states that all powers that the Constitution neither gives exclusively to the federal government nor takes from the states are reserved for the states Federal legislation that affects business must be based on an expressed unconditional grant of authority The Constitution also allocates power of the federal government among three branches of government First three articles of the Constitution establish the legislative, executive, and judicial branches; they’re independent branches of the federal government Constitution ensures that each branch maintains a separate sphere of power to prevent any one of them from obtaining undue power and monopolizing government control Constitution also establishes a system of checks and balances Each branch’s powers keep the other branches from dominating the government Constitution does not explicitly allow courts to review legislative and executive actions to determine whether they are constitutional, but early common law established a process called judicial law Judicial law is the power of a court to review legislative and executive actions, such as a law or...

Words: 2852 - Pages: 12

Free Essay

Defamation of Religion

...The dictionary definition of defamation is, “false or unjustified injury of the good reputation of another.” Also the dictionary definition of religion is, “ritual observance of faith.” That means the the meaning of defamation of religion is the false spreading of someones observance of faith. In general religion is a tricky topic to discuss and find a common ground for. For hundreds of years this topic has brought controversy between individuals, countries, and different religions. Although there really isn’t one profound solution to this topic that can please everyone around the world, there could be on that pleases at least 80-90%. People would argue that freedom of religion is not the same thing as freedom of speech and that if a country has freedom of religion they should not allow their people to also have freedom of speech. Both freedom of speech and freedom of religion, however, go under the UN’s Human Rights Committee. In 1966 the UN Human Rights Committee cooperated with the ICCPR, International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, and established a treaty that “provides for freedom of opinion and expression and other fundamental rights.” In 1983 there was a debate of freedom of religion that resulted in a 4 paragraph resolution. Although, after that there was an intense 2 year debate that had a result of a 52 paragraph resolution written by the General Commissioner No. 34. It is eminent that the UN has been concerned and involved in this issue for over a 2 or...

Words: 582 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Southeast Asian Region and Orientalism

...as: diversity (K Danielson, 2009). In my research paper, I will draw Indonesia as a representation of the whole Southeast Asia region. The reason for doing so is due to Indonesia’s diverse characteristic, which I believe is very representative of the region as a whole. By analyzing President Barack Obama’s speech: “Indonesia’s Example to the World”, I will discuss how Obama portrays Indonesia as a Southeast Asia country in five areas: environment, people, economic, politics, and religion. Further, I will bring up the ideas of Orientalism and Othering and discuss whether Obama’s speech reveals these two concepts and how these concepts helped illustrate Indonesia as well as the Southeast Asia region. Indonesia in Obama’s Speech In the first place, with regards to the environmental issue, Obama mentioned about the “tsunami and the volcanic eruptions” (B Obama, 2010). Truly, these are the life threatening environmental problems in not only Indonesia, but also the whole Southeast Asia area. I will cite the most recent event, Typhoon Haiyan in Philippine, as an example (The Guardian, 2013). The frequently bring up of these environmental problems, both in Obama’s speech and 1 mxu033@u.washington.edu Minyue Xu 1364917 other media sources, illustrates the Southeast Asia as a region full of natural disasters and might further evokes sympathy. In the second place, Obama introduced the concept of “people” in Indonesia, which I think...

Words: 2429 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Affordable Care Act and Corporations

...Diego Salinas, Matt Hammer, and Daniel Mishkin Facts The First Amendment of the United States Constitution states, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of Grievances.” Numerous cases discuss whether corporations have First Amendment rights, however only few cases discuss whether the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment applies to corporations. In Central Hudson v. PSC (1980) and Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission (2010) the Supreme Court ruled that the First Amendment protects corporations’ commercial speech and political speech, respectively. In Santa Clara Company v. Southern Pacific Railroad (1886) the court ruled that the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment applies to corporations. The issue of whether the Affordable Care Act violates individuals’ rights to Free Exercise of Religion has also been a hotly debated topic. The Supreme Court Case Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye v. Hialeah (1993) discussed whether the government can give ordinances that violate an individual’s right to Free Exercise. The Supreme Court Case Shervert v. Verner (1963) showed that a company cannot not provide an employee with compensation benefits if it interferes with the employee’s right to Free Exercise. Issue Should corporations receive...

Words: 2924 - Pages: 12