...Federal vs. State Policy Comparison Yadira Garcia Rodriguez Federal vs. States Policy Comparison In this assignment, I will be comparing and contrasting the differences and similarities of the federal and state government as it pertains to their role in the implementation of criminal justice policy, also I will address all aspects of policy development and implementation. A public policy is the body of principles that underpin the operation of legal systems in each state, also I will discuss each of the policies and how they are similar and how they are different. Federal and State policies are made to help keep our Country running smoothly. If there were no policies then keeping our Country safe would be a hard task. Policies are principles that are set to help make our Country operate on a daily bases. I like to think of it as rules that are set to keep our Country safe, because if there were no rules then everyone would be doing their own thing which could cause for a much disorganized situation and a chaos society. What is the definition of federal government? (A government with strong central powers According to "The Free Dictionary” (2012).When it comes to the federal government, their powers also control and pay the debt within this country. They also are the ones that created the rules and walls for immigration. They establish the punishment for those who create counterfeiting crimes. They also provide the fix in the...
Words: 1047 - Pages: 5
...Banjos (State vs. Federal) The United States Judicial System Dee Montano CJA/204 April 3, 2012 Sherre D. Corniel The Dueling Banjos (State vs. Federal) The United States Judicial System Frustration, confusion, and complexity; these three words can and are used regularly to describe the justice system within the United States. A better understanding of the history, principles, and role of the dual court system is necessary for a comprehensive understanding of the American justice system. FEDERALISM vs. ANTI-FEDERALISM The roots of the modern court system in the United States can be found in the principle of federalism. When the delegates met in Philadelphia for the Constitutional Convention among other issues that needed to be addressed was a national judicial system; the Articles of Confederation was woefully inadequate in providing for this. The dual judicial system that exists today was given life with the passage of Article III of the U.S. Constitution ("[t]he judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one Supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish.") Article III was a compromise between the Federalists, supporters of a strong central government, who thought that the federal judiciary should contain all of the courts (trial, appellate, and supreme). Whereas the Anti-Federalists, proponents of states’ rights, believed that an all-inclusive federal judiciary would minimize states’ rights...
Words: 1654 - Pages: 7
...331 Week 2 Assignment State vs. Federal https://hwguiders.com/downloads/soc-331-week-2-assignment-state-vs-federal/ SOC 331 Week 2 Assignment State vs. Federal SOC 331 Week 2 Assignment State vs. Federal https://hwguiders.com/downloads/soc-331-week-2-assignment-state-vs-federal/ SOC 331 Week 2 Assignment State vs. Federal SOC 331 Week 2 Assignment State vs. Federal https://hwguiders.com/downloads/soc-331-week-2-assignment-state-vs-federal/ SOC 331 Week 2 Assignment State vs. Federal SOC 331 Week 2 Assignment State vs. Federal https://hwguiders.com/downloads/soc-331-week-2-assignment-state-vs-federal/ SOC 331 Week 2 Assignment State vs. Federal SOC 331 Week 2 Assignment State vs. Federal https://hwguiders.com/downloads/soc-331-week-2-assignment-state-vs-federal/ SOC 331 Week 2 Assignment State vs. Federal SOC 331 Week 2 Assignment State vs. Federal https://hwguiders.com/downloads/soc-331-week-2-assignment-state-vs-federal/ SOC 331 Week 2 Assignment State vs. Federal SOC 331 Week 2 Assignment State vs. Federal https://hwguiders.com/downloads/soc-331-week-2-assignment-state-vs-federal/ SOC 331 Week 2 Assignment State vs. Federal SOC 331 Week 2 Assignment State vs. Federal https://hwguiders.com/downloads/soc-331-week-2-assignment-state-vs-federal/ SOC 331 Week 2 Assignment State vs. Federal SOC 331 Week 2 Assignment State vs. Federal https://hwguiders.com/downloads/soc-331-week-2-assignment-state-vs-federal/ SOC 331 Week 2 Assignment...
Words: 1008 - Pages: 5
...There are many differences and similarities between state/local governments, and federal governments. The federal government is superior to the state and local governments. State governments do basic things such as licensing professionals, while federal governments do advanced things such as declaring war. The state governments make decisions that have an impact on the states, while federal governments decide the fate of the country. Both state/local governments and federal governments have the same structure. They have the three branches, the legislative branch, the executive branch, and the judicial branch. The judicial branch interprets the law/oversees the courts, the executive branch executes the law, meanwhile, the legislative branch...
Words: 392 - Pages: 2
...American Government FEDERAL POWERS VS STATE POWERS Based on what I have gathered in the lectures Federal Powers are based on more of a national agreement as a whole with declaring what national laws that needs to be made. For instance declaring war as well as raising and maintaining the army and navy. Federal Powers also made laws to enforce the Constitution, and implying powers based on the elastic clause powers that were considered “necessary and proper” for carrying out the enumerated (or express) powers. Based on my research with what I learn through the lecture and web browsing and example of the elastic clause was back in 1791, Federalists in Congress argued that the creation of a national bank was “necessary and proper” for Congress to execute its enumerated powers to coin and borrow money and regulate currency. McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) confirmed Congress’s right to found this national bank. Then we have our three branches that help divide federal powers responsibilities which are the executive branch were the president implements the laws, the legislative branch were the Congress makes the laws, and the judiciary branch where the court system interprets the laws and decided legal controversies. Whereas, the State Powers Exercise powers neither delegated to the national government nor prohibited from the states by the U.S. The lecture used example like being able set legal drinking and smoking ages. State Powers also focused on establishing local governments...
Words: 450 - Pages: 2
...Tania Covarrubias History 111 Evan Pritsos May 6, 2018 State vs Federal Judiciary Judiciary is one of three branches of government; the other two are the Executive and Legislative branches. The purpose of judiciary is to interpret and protect the law. Judiciary acts like a guardian for our Constitution in our court system. Within the boundaries of each state and coexisting with state courts are numerous federal district and appellate courts that function independently. It may seem overwhelming and baffling to consider what legal matter may be decided in which forum. But for the most part, federal and state courts have their own separate purpose and part in applying the laws before it and administering justice to all. Federal Judiciary The...
Words: 1139 - Pages: 5
...Running head: STATE VS. FEDERAL REGULATIONS PAPER State vs. Federal Regulations Paper XXXXXXXX University of Phoenix XXXXXXX MGT/434 State vs. Federal Regulations Paper Employees are protected by many federal and state laws that regulate what an employer cannot and can do. Therefore, figuring out which employment laws apply to the workforce can present a challenge because they can come from federal and state sources. The laws that are applicable to each workforce sector for employee protections depends on many factors; the number of employees, the type of business it conducts, and if it crosses state boundaries. The purpose of this paper is to examine how federal and state governments differ in their application of employments laws and will discuss an employment protection provided exclusively by a state government. State vs. Federal Wage, hour and employment laws governing employers and employees are set at the state level and the federal level. Often measurable differences between federal laws and state laws exist depending on the state the company is operating in. When this occurs, companies are supposed to comply and govern their policies to follow the laws that offer the best protection to the employee. On the federal level the agency over employment law is The US Department of Labor (DOL) this agency administers federal employment laws. In most states employment laws are administered by the states labor division. With many agencies under...
Words: 1942 - Pages: 8
...testo testo testo testo testo testo testo v testo v testo vvvv testo testo vvvv testo v testo csc dfasfdfdfd gdgf gfg g d fadfadsfdsfa dfdf fdfdfdfd dfdfdfdf fff ffdffefef fdfdfdf dfdddfdfdfdfd fdddfaeretrewgtrw qwer weret tt t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t t te e e e e e ere r er eedf e erefgt f gfggrg fjthe the mana jjun dfdkfla reithtrg dflfjdf the man ate the afat fafa the man ate the cake oupf fadfda ld fa testo Radric Davis (born February 12, 1980),[1] better known by his stage name Gucci Mane, is an American rapper. He debuted in 2005 with Trap House, followed by Hard to Kill in 2006, Trap-A-Thon, and Back to the Trap House in 2007. In 2009, his second studio album The State vs. Radric Davis was released. The Appeal: Georgia's Most Wanted was released in 2010, and is his highest charting album so far. Gucci Mane has released many other mixtapes and independent albums as well. While serving a six-month jail term for assault in late 2005, Davis was charged with murder, though the charges were later dropped due to a lack of evidence. In 2009, he served a year-long county jail sentence for violating probation for his 2005 aggravated assault conviction. As of 2013 Gucci Mane is currently working & planning the release of his seventh studio album Trap House III: The GuWop...
Words: 257 - Pages: 2
...Wicker The Role and Functions of Law Michigan Court Structure vs Federal Court State courts are established by a state and Federal courts are established under the US constitution, they are defined mainly by jurisdiction. The court structures in the state of Michigan and the Federal Courts structure are almost the same. The Supreme Court is the highest for both the state and Federal Courts, and right below that is the court of appeals. Next is where the difference begins, the state of Michigan lower courts consist District Court, Probate Court and Municipal Court -if a case in one of these courts leads to a jury trial it is the moved to a higher court, which is the Circuit Court (Court Statistics Project). Then there is the Court of Claims which is the same level as the Circuit Court, the only difference is that the Court of Claims do not handle jury trials. In the Federal Courts right below the Court of Appeal is the U.S. District Courts (i.e. Bankruptcy Courts, U.S. Court of International Trade, U.S. Court of Federal Claims) and then Military Courts (American Government, 2008-2014). Judicial Review The concept of judicial review is to decide whether actions of the executive and legislative branch are legal under the Constitution. Judicial review is important in the US government because it serves as a check on the other branches of government. The Supreme Court also has used judicial review to order federal, state, and local officials to refrain from behaving unconstitutionally...
Words: 747 - Pages: 3
...Federal Court vs. NC State Court Danielle Paul CJS/220 06/05/13 Reginald Anthony Federal Court vs. NC State Court The NC state court system structure is as follows: the highest court is the Supreme Court, then the Court of Appeals, Superior Court and District Court. The Supreme Court hears mandatory jurisdiction in civil, capital criminal, criminal, administrative agency, juvenile and disciplinary cases, as well as discretionary jurisdiction in civil, criminal, administrative agency, juvenile, advisory opinions for the executive and legislature. The court of Appeals hears mandatory jurisdiction in civil, noncapital criminal, administrative agency, juvenile, disciplinary, original and interlocutory proceeding cases, Superior court hears tort, contract, real property rights, miscellaneous civil cases, exclusive estate, administration agency appeals jurisdiction, felony, misdemeanor and criminal appeals. District Court hears tort, contract, real property rights, small claims, mental health, civil jurisdiction, domestic relations, misdemeanor, DWI/DUI, traffic violations, juvenile jurisdictions and preliminary hearings. The Federal Court system consists of the Supreme Court, being the highest, District Court, and Appellate Courts. The U.S. Supreme Court hears a limited number of cases that usually start in the federal or state courts and are usually concerning questions about the Constitution or federal law. The District Courts are the trail courts of the federal...
Words: 344 - Pages: 2
...What is a federal form of government? What image do you have of when you think of federalism? \Do you think of the federal level of government? State government? Local governments? All three? Layer Cake, Marble Cake....21st Century View: Intergovernmental Relations Do democratic governments need to be organized as federal systems? Great Britain has a Unitary form of government How does this differ from the U.S.? Powerful central government with federal or central government mandates (laws) that are implemented (put into place) throughout the whole country= Unitary govt. Examples: National Health Policy throughout the whole country so that you can go from city to city in Great Britain and use your health card at any hospital. (Portability of health insurance in U.S.: can get care anywhere in our country) Current American example of an issue that is being discussed as a national issue: elections Should we have Congress pass federal rules for identification, times polls are open, voting ahead of time, etc.? Do you personally tend to look to the federal government to solve problems in the U.S. ? (synonyms for federal govt.: national govt. and central govt) OR Do you tend to focus on your state government or on your city or county (local) government? We do not have good political theories of when federal minimum national standards are appropriate...
Words: 1421 - Pages: 6
...Page 1 Unit 1- Individual project Isabel Hernandez CRJS101 July 26th 2013 Guillermo Samudio Page 2 The local law enforcement agencies main purpose is to provide patrol, uphold the laws of the jurisdiction and to investigate local crimes. The local law enforcement includes differing agencies like the municipal (local police departments), county (local sheriff department), regional and tribal (local reservation police department) police that get there authority from the local government. The state law enforcement agencies main purpose is to do highway patrol and state wide investigations. State police aid the local police department with emergencies and investigations that are beyond the jurisdiction and resource boundaries of the local departments. Federal law enforcement agencies key role in place is to work with certain types of crimes. The FBI, the US marshals and Border Patrol are a few of the main agencies. FBI has eight major investigations. Counterterrorism (a prevention of terrorism by military or political actions), public corruption (the usage of public office for private gain), civil rights (citizens rights to social freedom, political and equality), counterintelligence (preventing sabotage, spying, intelligence gather by a foreign country or enemy), organized crime (illegal actions committed by groups or organizations of criminals such an example are mafia or gangs), major theft/violent crimes (Violent Crime include Bank Robbery, Gangs, Kidnapping...
Words: 1100 - Pages: 5
...Medicare and Medicaid are both government-sponsored programs designed to help cover healthcare costs. While both were established by the U.S. government in 1965 and are taxpayer funded, they are actually very different programs with differing eligibility requirements and coverage. Medicare is designed to help with long-term care for the elderly, while Medicaid covers healthcare costs for the poor. Medicare is a federal program attached to Social Security. It is available to all U.S. citizens 65 years of age or older and it also covers people with certain disabilities. It is available regardless of income. Medicaid is a joint federal and state program that helps low-income individuals and families pay for the costs associated with medical and long-term custodial care. The federal government funds up to 50% of the cost of each state's Medicaid program, with more affluent states receiving less funding than less affluent states. Because of this federal/state partnership, there are actually 50 different Medicaid programs, one for each state. Unlike Medicare, which is available to everyone, Medicaid has strict eligibility requirements. Medicaid is often used to fund long-term care, which is not covered by Medicare or by most private health insurance policies. Medicaid is the nation's largest single source of long-term care funding. Medicare and Medicaid programs work together to provide medical coverage to elderly and poor people. Medicare is the primary medical coverage provider...
Words: 312 - Pages: 2
...QUESTION #1 A New American Model - the National Governmental Orbit of Power The auto bailout is a good example of what the federal government can do to react to fiscal down towns. The federal government has the ability to step in and take action during times of great financial difficulty such as the Great Recession of 2008-2009. The federal government can enact policies on the macro level. While cities and local governments take action to solve their local problems, they cannot enact a strategy that will improve the state or national economy. By raising taxes and cutting services, states and cities were making the recession worse and actually were canceling out much of the stimulus being done by the federal government (Kantor & Judd, 2013). In order to counter act the trouble created by local government reaction to the recession, the federal government created a $787 billion stimulus package that included aid to state and local governments. Kantor and Judd state that the federal stimulus did not change the structure of the intergovernmental system, which requires cities to live within their revenue sources. The bail out of the auto industry was a targeted effort on the federal level to save a critical and important industry in the United States. At the time of the bailout, the auto industry contributed 3.6%, or $500 billion, to total U.S. GDP output (Amadeo, 2015). Some say the auto industry bailout was a political move because it was not really necessary. At the time of...
Words: 2155 - Pages: 9
...To what extent was federal government responsible from improving the status of black people in the US in the years 1945-55? The status of black people living in America had changed incredibly in the years 1945-55. This is because of the different presidents, congress, and the Supreme Court. Although I believe that the federal government was highly responsible for improving the status of black people in the years 1945-55, this essay will also be examining other factors that may have helped; factors such as Martin Luther King, other groups, and the media. To a certain extent, the Supreme Court played a considerable part in improving the status of black people in the US in the years 1945-55. For example, court cases such as Brown vs Topeka (1954), Browder vs Gayle (1956), and Morgan vs Virginia (1946) were all very important in improving the status of black people. This is because the Topeka case argued that the ‘separate but equal’ doctrine was a contradiction in terms, that is to say they believed that it was impossible for citizens to receive services that were both ‘separate’ and ‘equal’, The Browder case decision ruled that segregation of buses was illegal and the Morgan case ruled that segregation on interstate buses was illegal which meant that on buses both black and white people had the same status. This is why the Supreme Court played a considerable part in improving the status of black people in the years 1945-55, because all of these cases picked apart the legal...
Words: 688 - Pages: 3
