Premium Essay

Steven Pinker's Essay 'Mind Over Mass Media'

Submitted By
Words 391
Pages 2
In the essay “Mind Over Mass Media” by Steven Pinker, Pinker is clarifying that the media does not negatively affect our mind. A few samples he uses are that in the 1950's people were anxious about the possibility that comic books would hurt the younger generation and transform them into terrible kids, when truly crime was falling to record lows. In the 1990's people likewise imagined that computer games made youngsters lash out and get to be delinquents, when really that was the with the considerable American wrongdoing decay. With any new media that has developed individuals constantly trust that our brain power and abilities will fall. Pinker states that restraint and self-discipline is all it takes to not be occupied or suffocate in the

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Nicholas Carr's Essay 'Is Google Making USupid?'

...In our society today, mass media and the fast growing rate of technological advancement has made a major impact on the loss of humanity's intelligence. Yet, the solution to this theory can be answered and argued about in various ways. In the essays, “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” and “Mind Over Mass Media” the Authors share their opinions on the impacts that technology advancement and mass media have made within the following amount of recent years. For example, in the essay “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” Author, Nicholas Carr, who is a much known writer and also finalist for the 2011 Pulitzer Prize, discusses how his level of thinking has changed due to using technology. He also supports all of his evidence that he discusses throughout his essay...

Words: 1082 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Epis' Paper on Positivism

...-“Strauss versus Brains and Genes or the postmodern vengeful return of positivism.” This essay first started as an answer to what I deemed very problematic, i.e. the disputation which I found in bad faith (un-authentic to use a philosophical term or an existentialist term), of the mediatic, dashing Harvard cognitivist/linguist, Steven Pinker, in his article “Neglected novelists, embattled English professors, tenure-less historians, and other struggling denizens of the Humanities, Science is not your Enemy—a plea for an intellectual truce,” (The New Republic--August 19). Then the counter-arguments against Steven Pinker’s conception of the “human animal” developed into an essay arguing that the New Positivism, not science, or technology per say, was the enemy of humanism and its avatars as such. The point is not to become a postmodern anti-scientific Luddite. Genomics are changing the world in ways we barely imagine yet and will re-define what it means to be human (a becoming already imagined by science fiction writers, social critics and critical thinkers such as the feminist Donna Haraway with her “Cyborg”). The point is also not to turn “anti-brainiac.” Without a brain we would become vegetative, a vegetal…, i.e. a purely “natural body,” a “zombie.” If we make use of this “computer” allegory which is an analog but not a homologue, and which is used ad nauseam used by psycho-biologists, without a hard-drive there is no software. But is this a reason to say that the software...

Words: 20403 - Pages: 82