Free Essay

Strategy

In:

Submitted By aleon
Words 3445
Pages 14
FAMILY NAME: LEON
FIRST NAME: ALEXEI
REG NO: 1102810
ESSEX BUSINESS SCHOOL
COVER SHEET
BE431 BUSINESS STRATEGY

Based on your own research, analyse the current strategic position of Tesla Motors both in terms of their competitive environment and their capabilities. You must draw on relevant frameworks discussed on the module. Your comments in this section should include a discussion of the extent to which the frameworks you used were helpful for your analysis. Critically evaluate the concept of ‘disruption’ in the context of business strategy. Your analysis in this section should make specific reference to Sillince (2006).

Lecturers: Dr. Christina Volkmann, Dr. Marina Michalski and Dr. Danielle Tucker
Date: 2nd March 2015
Word Count: 2553

Introduction

The literature in the field of business and technology has covered the analysis of the term disruptive innovation in respect to the concept of competitive advantage. Scholars such as Christensen (1997) and Johnson (2008) have developed the theory of disruptive innovation and focused on stressing the difference between the disruptive innovations which are sustainable and the ones which are not. Furthermore, the research conducted by Sillince (2006) as well as Penrose (1959), Balogun (2014) has been essential to critically evaluate the methods used by the companies to construct their competitive advantage. The persuasion often used by the companies to differentiate themselves from the competitors and gain competitive advantage has been one of the key arguments made by Sillince. The discussion from this paper includes in its first part the VRIO framework used to analyse the internal aspects of Tesla Motors, in comparison with Sillince`s (2006) arguments which stress the importance of the rhetoric in the process of evaluating the knowledge (resources) of Tesla. Furthermore, the second part of this essay will analyse the external environment of Tesla by using the PESTEL framework.

Tesla Motors is an American company established in 2003 which produces, designs and markets vehicles and components powered exclusively by electricity (Mangram, 2012). At the moment, Tesla has no competitors which manufacture zero-emission sports cars in serial production (Mangram, 2012). Furthermore, Tesla has recently entered the luxury vehicle sedan market with its Model S and it seeks to sell sleek, eco-friendly designs at high margins (Sun, 2011). According to Sun (2011), Tesla has a completely different business model in comparison with General Motors, Ford and Chrysler in Detroit. The previously mentioned author asserts that Tesla`s strategy reflects Apple Computer`s business model which attempts to address the increasing demands for electric vehicles (Sun, 2011).

Christensen (1997) has initially defined the disrupting innovation as `a process by which a product or service takes root initially in simple applications at the bottom of a market and then relentlessly moves up the market, eventually displacing established competitors` (Čiutienė and Thattakath, 2014, p. 16). Christensen argues that the disruptive innovations are not necessarily advanced technologies and depicts the fact that the evolution of business at industry or market level has caused a shift from the technological focus to a business modelling focus (Christensen and Raynor, 2003; Johnson, Christensen and Kagermann, 2008). Several contemporary examples of disruptive innovators consist of Google advertising, Cisco routers as well as Fidelity mutual funds and Southwest Airlines business model (Christensen et al., 2009). The previously mentioned companies have changed the entire market over time because they introduced an innovation which `disrupted` the market in unexpected ways (Cortez, 2014).

Tellis (2006) has challenged some of Christensen’s conclusions, arguing that the assumption stated by the latter scholar who supports the fact that disruptive technologies disturb incumbent technologies can only be verified after the market has been changed. Accordingly, it can be argued that in the case of Tesla Motors the strategic orientation which the company is adopting is important because it includes its philosophy of how to conduct business in order to acquire greater performance (Gatignon and Xuereb, 1997). According to Day (1994), the beliefs and the values of Tesla Motors, in this particular case, define the resources to be used and consolidate the capabilities and the resources into a `cohesive whole` (Zhou, Yim and Tse, 2005, p. 45). Hence, the previously mentioned capacities represent the origin of the competitive advantage which and are hard to trade, duplicate or imitate (Day, 1994; Hunt and Morgan, 1995).

The resource-based view (RBV) framework can be used to assess the organisational strategy of Tesla Motors and identify the value, rarity, imitability and nonsitutability (VRIN) of its resources (Sillince, 2006). The previously mentioned attributes can determine the competitive advantage of Tesla and are seen by Sillince (2006) as rhetorical constructions. In addition, it can be noted that Sillince (2006) is criticising the fact that the rhetoric has a significant influence on an organisation`s actions because of its practice to link resources, rhetoric and RBV. Similarly, Bitzer (1968) asserts that only the rhetorical situation made up of the constraints that bear on the audiences, resources and a critical firm issue, determine the occurrence of such a discussion about the organisational resources (RBV). A conclusive example of a constraint which relates to the particularities of the organisation and industry`s use of rhetoric is the public announcement made by an organisation with more market power to attract more attention (Sillince, 2006).

By applying to Tesla the VRIO framework which is the improved version of Barney`s (1991) VRIN model, it can be determined to what extent the company`s resources are a source of sustainable competitive advantage. According to the latter framework, an organisation can achieve and maintain a competitive advantage only when it has resources that meet all of the VRIO principles: value, rarity, imitability and organisation exploitation (Rothaermel, 2015). Firstly, Tesla can be considered valuable because it is the only electrical car manufacturer which provides its own `Supercharger Network` and focuses on developing the rapid-charging technology while trying to reduce the battery pricing costs by 30 percent (Financial Times, 2014). Furthermore, by referring to the propriety showroom sales of Tesla, it can be noted that they use a franchise system and keep sales and service centres in-house (Financial Times, 2014). This business model gives to Tesla the capacity to manage their image throughout the entire value chain (Fleming, 2014).

The second principle of the VRIO framework refers to control of the resources (Rothaermel, 2013). In the case of Tesla, it can be argued that the decision made by their CEO, Elon Musk, to disclose the patent book to the competitors has a significant effect on the company`s level of rarity and might represent a vulnerability as the Model S has over 250 registered patents (Fleming, 2014 ). However, Tesla differentiate itself from the rest of all their competitors because of their original sales model as well their supercharge infrastructure available for their customers in USA, Canada, Europe, China, Japan and Australia. Thirdly, taking into account the inimitable principle, Tesla has been successful in maintaining the brand control due to its `Silicon Valley` approach to the business model reflected by their dealerships as well as their focus on solving complex problems (Fleming, 2014).

Finally, the last principle of the VRIO model analyses to what extent is an organisation able to exploit its resources (Rothaermel, 2013). In this regard, Tesla has been successful in exploiting its organisational capability in order to generate a supplementary source of income from selling to other firms their extensive research. Furthermore, all the models produced by Tesla are based intensely on the research and development conducted by their department which it will be continually exploited in order to produce more affordable models on a larger scale. Similarly, the excellent opportunity represented by Tesla`s supercharger network it is expected to expand and further develop in order to deliver a better customer satisfaction (Fleming, 2014).

A major criticism of the RBV framework is pointed out by Sillince (2006) who asserts that RBV is founded on subjective or socially constructed beliefs. He claims that `there is no account in the theory of how actors come and hold those belief about resources` (Sillince, 2006, p. 188). Similarly, Priem and Butler (2001) argue that RBV model is ineffective at clarifying how companies create value, rarity, inimitability, and nonsubstitutability. Furthermore, Sillince (2006) argues that the RBV framework does not indicate how a company can maintain its competitive advantage on the long term. The key problem highlighted by Sillince (2006) is related to the methods used by firms to rhetorically present their competitive advantage to their external and internal audiences. It can be noted that the competitive advantage is based on intangible resources (e.g. culture of the organisation) which can be socially constructed with the influence of media, company`s websites, annual reports as well as newspapers and journals.

In order to critically analyse the business strategies used by companies to gain the competitive advantage, it can be argued that Penrose`s (1959) influential theory about how firms grow is useful to determine to what extent is a firm`s fast growth sustainable. The central argument stated by Penrose refers to the fact that the administrative restraints have a significant influence on the speed of the firm`s growth, therefore the growth process is dynamically constrained. In the case of Tesla, the growth happened gradually as it took five years to release the first model, Tesla Roadster. However, the fact that the CEO of Tesla, Elon Musk has expressed its interest to collaborate with companies such as Toyota and Lotus and even reveal Tesla`s patterns, shows that the company`s interested to establish themselves on the market before the competitors with hybrid and hydrogen-cell cars. In this case, it can be argued that the disruptive innovation at Tesla can also said to be socially constructed by the influential newspapers such as The Financial Times (2015) and Forbes (2015) who assert that `Elon Musk is revolutionizing two industries at once, disrupting traditional automakers with his electric car maker Tesla and shaking up spacecraft with SpaceX`.

According to Zhou, Yim and Tse (2005), there are two different perspectives (e.g. `inside-out` and `outside-in`) which can be used to achieve the competitive advantage. In order to further analyse Tesla Motors, the `outside-in` perspective has to be taken into account. In this case, the PESTEL (Political, Economic, Socio-Cultural, Technological, Environment and Legal) framework represents a relevant tool to evaluate the demand uncertainty, competitive intensity as well as the external market forces and technological turbulence of Tesla Motors (Porter, 1980, 1985). PESTEL framework has two essential roles for a firm. On one hand, it identifies the environment within which the firm performs. On the other hand, it identifies the relevant information that will enable the firm to anticipate circumstances and situations that it might confront in the future (Rothaermel, 2015). By taking into account the political factors which affect Tesla, it can be noted that at the international level, several countries have encouraged the adoption of alternative-fuelled automobiles (Lane, 2014). For example, the American citizens who use hydrogen fuel cell vehicles could get tax incentives ranging from $20 to $40,000 (Lane, 2014). Furthermore, due to the fact that Tesla operates in 17 countries from Asia, North America and Western Europe, it has to take into consideration different political patterns which influence their business operations (Tesla, 2014). In this case, the most significant problem which Tesla has is in New Jersey, USA due to the fact that in this state the new cars can be only sold through a franchised dealer rather than the manufacturer itself (George, 2014).

The economic factors which can be taken into account when analysing Tesla Motors are related to the fact that in the recent years the alternative energy industries have registered significant growth (BBC News, 2014). However, the cost of using the traditional oil powered cars has been decreasing once the oil price began to shrink. In addition, the increasing purchase power of the customers after the recession as well as the recovery of GDP can be reflected in a higher demand for more efficient cars (World Bank, 2014). The next aspect taken under consideration by the PESTEL framework refers to the social factors. In this case, Tesla has been considered a great alternative because customers have rated fuel efficiency as one of the most important aspects when it comes to deciding which new car to buy (KPMG, 2013). However, a major drawback for Tesla is represented by their expensive batteries and limited range as well as their high purchase prices (KPMG, 2013).

The automotive industry has been influenced significantly by the technology advancement and it started to shift towards a better energy efficiency approach (KPMG, 2013). According to Kachaner et al. (2011), market places as well as B2B platforms have given increased opportunities to the car industry which led to reducing the costs of the vehicles which use alternative power. In the case of Tesla, the technological problems raised by the customers determined the company to recall almost all of the cars in 2013 in order to fix a problem with the software which was causing an overheating (Bunkley, 2014). In addition, McKinsey and Company (2013) assert that once disruptive technology reaches the maturity, it has the potential to change the entire industry. This relates to the fact that Tesla is the only manufacturer which is able to offer to its customers a car`s autonomy between 260 and 300 miles, which is significantly superior in comparison with what any other competitor can offer (Tesla, 2014). The last two factors of the PESTEL model refer to the environmental and legal aspects. Firstly, the growing awareness to the climate change has a significant effect on how the companies operate as well as on the customers who take into account more carefully the environmental effect implied by the production process of products (Snyder, 2014). In the case of Tesla, it can be noted that the company has been incorporated the environmentally friendly approach, being one of the single manufacturers of luxury sports car with zero CO2 emissions (Tesla, 2014). Finally, the legal aspects affecting Tesla are related to the fact that several states from the United States do not allow the auto manufacturers to sell directly the new cars. Despite of the efforts made by Tesla to enter the car market, the company is still restricted to sell in Virginia, Maryland, New Jersey, Texas and Arizona (Snyder, 2014).

Conclusion

The present paper was designed to determine the efficiency of the frameworks used to analyse the internal (RBV) and external environment (PESTEL) of Tesla Motors and to determine the effect of rhetoric marketing used to create the symbolic value of the brand. The first part of the essay attempted to relate the concept of disruption with the competitive advantage which the RBV model is creating with the help of the social construction. In the case of Tesla Motors, the internal environment analysed with the VRIO model has established the fact that Tesla is valuable, rare, inimitable and a strongly organised. However, the rhetoric of Tesla is constructed especially by publications such as Financial Times and Forbes, as well as by the interviews of its founder Elon Musk. Tesla has been considered as a disrupter innovator and the image which the company has established on the automotive industry in the recent years is stronger than before. The disruption can be assessed only after the market has changed completely, therefore it is necessary to indicate that this process takes a long period of time and it is possible only if the content of the knowledge can be sustained by its performance statistics. Both of the frameworks used to analyse Tesla present several limitations as they cannot evaluate precisely the internal and external environment as scholars such as Sillince and Balogun indicate in their analysis. The innovation which Tesla has used to differentiate them from the competition has to be sustained by the more established competitors from the automotive industry in order to generate the shift towards the production of the electrical cars instead of hybrid or hydrogen-cell powered ones. Therefore, the strategy adopted by Tesla`s CEO to share the patents is suitable when taking into account the potential of the company for further development in the future.

REFERENCES

Balogun, J., Jacobs, C., Jarzabkowski, P., Mantere, S. and Vaara, E. (2014). Placing Strategy Discourse in Context: Sociomateriality, Sensemaking, and Power. Journal of Management Studies, 51(2), pp.175-201.
Barney, J.B., (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), pp. 99–120.
BBC News, (2014). Petrol price reaches record high. [online] Available at:http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-17490088 [Accessed 1 March. 2015].
Bitzer, L. F. (1968). The rhetorical situation. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 1(1), 1-14.
Bower, J. and Christensen, C. (1995). Disruptive technologies: Catching the wave. Harvard Business Review, 73(1):43-53.
Bunkley, N. (2014). Tesla’s Global Sales top 22,000 in 2013, Stock Rises 16%. Retrieved from Automotive News: http://www.autonews.com/article/20140114/OEM05/140119794/teslas-global-sales-top-22000-in-2013-stock-rises-16
Christensen, C. (1997). The innovator's dilemma. Boston, Mass.: Harvard Business School Press.
Christensen, C. and Raynor, M. (2003). The innovator's solution. Boston, Mass.: Harvard Business School Press.
Christensen, C., Grossman, J. and Hwang, J. (2009). The innovator's prescription. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Čiutienė, R., Thattakath, E. (2014). Influence of Dynamic Capabilities in Creating Disruptive Innovation. Economics and Business. Vol.26, pp.15-21.
Cortez, N. (2014). Regulating Disruptive Innovation. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 29(137), pp.182-183.
Day, G. (1994). The Capabilities of Market-Driven Organizations. Journal of Marketing, 58(4), p.37.

Financial Times, (2014). Disrupters bring destruction and opportunity. [online] Available at: http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/b9677026-8b6d-11e4-ae73-00144feabdc0.html#slide0 [Accessed 1 Mar. 2015].
Flemin, M. (2014). Fleming & Moar Consulting Ltd. A Comprehensive Strategical Evaluation. pp.3-47.
Forbes, (2014). Powerful people. [online] Available at: http://www.forbes.com/ profile/ elon-musk/ [Accessed 1 Mar. 2015].
Gatignon, H. and Xuereb, J. (1997). Strategic Orientation of the Firm and New Product Performance, Journal of Marketing Research, 34, 77-90.
George, A. (2014). Tesla talking legislative battle over dealership regulations. NJBIZ.
Hunt, D. and Robert M. (1995). The Competitive Advantage Theory of Competition. Journal of Marketing, 59, 1-15.
Johnson, M., Christensen, C. and Kagermann, H. (2008). Reinventing your business model. Harvard Business Review.
Kachaner, N., Lindgardt, Z. and Michael, D. (2011). Innovating low-cost business models. Emerald, [online] 39(2), pp.43-48. Available at: http://www.emeraldinsight.com/case_studies.htm/case_studies.htm?articleid=1911692&show=html [Accessed 27 February. 2015].
KPMG. (2013). KPMG’s Global Automotive Executive Survey 2013. KPMG International.
Lane, R. (2014, March 27). Electric car federal tax credit may rise to $10,000 but won’t apply to Tesla. Retrieved from Ecomento: http://ecomento.com/2014/03/27/electric-car-federal-tax-credit-may-rise-to-10000-but-wont-apply-to-tesla/
Mangram, M. (2012). The globalization of Tesla Motors: a strategic marketing plan analysis. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 20(4), pp.289-312.
McKinsey & Company. (2013). Disruptive Technologies: advances that will transform life, business, and the global economy. McKinsey Global Institute.
Penrose, E. (1959). The theory of the growth in the firm. Oxford [England]: Blackwell.
Porter, M. (1980). Competitive strategy. New York: Free Press.
Porter, M. (1985). Competitive advantage. New York: Free Press.
Rothaermel, F. (2013). Strategic management. New York: McGraw-Hill Irwin.
Rothaermel, F. (2015). Strategic Management. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Education, pp.70-120.
Sillince, J. (2006). Resources and Organizational Identities: The Role of Rhetoric in the Creation of Competitive Advantage. Management Communication Quarterly, 20(2), pp.186-212.
Snyder, J. B. (2014). Tesla Gets Legal Go-ahead to Sell EVs in Pennsylvania. Retrieved from Autoblog Green: http://green.autoblog.com/2014/08/11/tesla-gets-legal-go-ahead-to-sell-evs-in-pennsylvania/
Sun, L. (2011). Tesla Motors (TSLA) is more Silicon Valley than Motor City. Investor Guide, February. Retrieved July 19, 2011, from http://www.investorguide.com/article/7896/ teslamotors-tsla-is-more-silicon-valley-than-motor-city/
Tellis, G. J. (2006). Disruptive technology or visionary leadership?. J. Prod. Innov. Manag., vol. 23, no. 1, 2006, pp. 34‒38.
Tesla Motors, Inc., (2014). Form 10-K Annual Report. Palo Alto, California. [online]Available at: http://ir.teslamotors.com/secfiling.cfm?filingID=1193125-14-69681&CIK=1318605 [Accessed 1 March. 2015].
World Bank, (2014). Global Economy at Turning Point, Says World Bank . [online] Availableat: http://www.worldbank.org/en/news/press-release/2014/01/14/global-economy-turning-point-world-bank [Accessed 1 March. 2015].
Zhou, K., Yim, C. and Tse, D. (2005). The Effects of Strategic Orientations on Technology- and Market-Based Breakthrough Innovations. Journal of Marketing, 69(2), pp.42-60.

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Strategy

...“Strategy articulates the firm’s preferred environment and the type of organisations it is striving to become.” – Hiroyuki Itami. Discuss why an understanding of strategy and strategic management is fundamental to an organisations success. There is no one specific and definitive meaning to the word strategy. You would generally consider strategy to be the process involved in setting goals and objectives and then, ultimately the way's of achieving these goals through the designated and limited resources. Strategy describes how a firm will achieve their goals using the necessary resources. The firms Strategy will generally be established by the leaders in an organisation. Strategy can be intentional or emergent. Mc Keown argued that strategy is about shaping the future. Mintzberg thinks its a pattern in a stream of decisions. They both think strategy is a very important part of any firm and what the firm is striving to be. The key steps in planning a strategy is usually coordinated by the top management. This involve Mintzberg's 5 P's for strategy: The consist of…. A plan, A pattern, A position, A prospective, A ploy. Plan, Strategy is a plan, usually an intended course of action, a way to deal with a situation. By this definition, strategies have two essential characteristics, they are made in advance of the actions to which they apply, and they are developed consciously and purposefully. Ploy Like plan, a strategy can be a ploy too, its really just a specific manoeuvre...

Words: 474 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Strategy

...In this paper, question will be answer to identify the board of new Hope Housing strategic strategy. In addition, this paper will identify the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats that are the basic of the Hope Housing strategic plan. One of New Hope Housing strategic plan that is identified in their strategic plan “is to demonstrate leadership in developing and implementing effective approaches in prevention, shelter and transitional housing to move homeless persons quickly to housing.” (www.newhopehousing.org). In the statement above New Hope is listing the issues in its strategic plan, which is vital in attacking a social issue. The first part of the five-part process begins with identification of practical alternatives and dreams of visions for resolving the strategic issues. (Renz; 2010). New Hope has implemented a strategy in writing to provide a solution to help with the housing situation in their community; as an organization, this is vital in managing issues formulating a strategy. New Hope is in the right direction with the implementation of this strategic plan and is align with the nonprofit strategic management cycle in regards to providing services and resource opportunities to the consumer. New Hope strategic plan is focusing on an issue that is facing the community by implemented a strategy to provide housing for the homeless. New Hope has chosen to follow the model that is identified by (Renz, 20100 as the three main topics in strategic decisions...

Words: 543 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Strategy

...sure you have a strategy? Donald C. Hambrick and James W, Fredrickson Executive Overview After more than 30 years of hard thinking about strategy, consultants and scholars have provided an abundance of /rameworks for analyzing strategic situations. Missing, however, has been any guidance as to v^hat the product of these tools should be—or virhat actually constitutes a strategy. Strategy has become a catchall term used to mean whatever one wants it to mean. Executives now talk about their "service strategy," their "branding strategy," their "acquisition strategy," or whatever kind of strategy that is on their mind at a particular moment. But strategists—whether they are CEOs of established firms, division presidents, or entrepreneurs—must have a strategy, an integrated, overarching concept of how the business will achieve its objectives. If a business must have a single, unified strategy, then it must necessarily have parts. What are those parts? We present a framework for strategy design, arguing that a strategy has five elements, providing answers to five questions—arenas: where will we be active? vehicles: how will we get there? differentiators: how will we win in the marketplace? staging: what will be our speed and sequence of moves? economic logic: how will we obtain our returns? Our article develops and illustrates these domains of choice, particularly emphasizing how essential it is that they form a unified whole. Consider these statements of strategy drawn from actual...

Words: 7729 - Pages: 31

Premium Essay

Strategy

...(Definition of Strategy) "Strategy is the direction and scope of an organisation over the long-term: which achieves advantage for the organisation through its configuration of resources within a challenging environment, to meet the needs of markets and to fulfil stakeholder expectations.” (Johnson and Scholes) Mintzberg starts off by identifying that there are differences in strategy, some are ‘intended’ and others ‘realised’. He states that this diagram allows the distinction of deliberate and emergent strategy to be identified. (Definition of Deliberate) It follows a calculated formula, where they set a goal, define a set of steps to reach that goal and then methodically act on each step, formulated by central leadership. This is a conscious and rational process that involves assessment of market structure, competitive analysis and detailed market research to determine specific customer needs, so much so it is a ‘surprise free situation’. (Definition of Emergent) On the other hand, an emergent strategy is a pattern of actions that develops over time in an organization in the absence (or despite) a specific set of goals. The extent to which change can be differentiated depends on whether a company chooses to implement developmental, transactional or transformational change (Ackerman 1997) As Mintzberg says, it is unlikely for a firm to be operating a ‘purely emergent’ or ‘purely deliberate’ strategy. Firms lie in between the two, which could be seen as the...

Words: 271 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Strategy

...Strategy Strategy is the long term direction of an organisation; it is the plan which decides the future course of action for an organisation or an individual. It is likely to be expressed in broad statement both about the direction and the action required to be taken by an organisation to achieve the objectives. For example: it may be stated in terms of market entry, new products or services or ways of operating. Strategic decisions are likely to be concerned with the scope of an organisation’s activities. And these types of decisions are normally about trying to achieve some advantages for the organisation over competitors. For example, Dell felt that the margins earned by many competitors were too high and that made them vulnerable to a strategy of lower prices and tighter margins. Strategy can be seen as creating opportunities by building on an organisation’s resources and competences. This is called resource-based view of strategy, which is concerned with exploiting the strategic capability of an organisation, in terms of the resources and competences to provide competitive advantage and yield new opportunities. E.g. a large MNC may focus its strategies on those businesses with strong brands. The strategy of an organisation is affected not only by environmental forces and strategic capability, but also by the values and expectation of those who have power in and around the organisation. The beliefs and values of the stakeholders will have a greater or lesser...

Words: 258 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Strategy

...Business Press Boston, Massachusetts ISBN-13: 978-1-4221-4672-9 4673BC This document is authorized for use only in GMBA-EN-BL_Abr2015_A1 - Strategy Implementation by Pedro Guillermo Ruiz, IE Business School from January 2016 to January 2017. Copyright 2008 Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America This chapter was originally published as chapter Introduction of The Heart of Change: Real-Life Stories of How People Change Their Organizations, copyright 2002 Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in or introduced into a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form, or by any means (electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise), without the prior permission of the publisher. Requests for permission should be directed to permissions@harvardbusiness.org, or mailed to Permissions, Harvard Business School Publishing, 60 Harvard Way, Boston, Massachusetts 02163. You can purchase Harvard Business Press books at booksellers worldwide.You can order Harvard Business Press books and book chapters online at www.harvardbusiness.org/press, or by calling 888-500-1016 or, outside the U.S. and Canada, 617-783-7410. This document is authorized for use only in GMBA-EN-BL_Abr2015_A1 - Strategy Implementation by Pedro Guillermo Ruiz, IE Business School from January 2016 to January 2017. INTRODUCTION The Heart of Change T ...

Words: 4275 - Pages: 18

Premium Essay

Strategy

...Slide 1.1 1: Introducing Strategy Johnson, Whittington and Scholes, Exploring Strategy, 9th Edition, © Pearson Education Limited 2011 Slide 1.2 Learning outcomes • Summarise the strategy of an organisation in a ‘strategy statement’. • Identify key issues for an organisation’s strategy according to the Exploring Strategy model. • Distinguish between corporate, business and operational strategies. • Understand how different people contribute to strategy at work. • Appreciate the contributions of different academic disciplines and theoretical lenses to practical strategy analysis. Johnson, Whittington and Scholes, Exploring Strategy, 9th Edition, © Pearson Education Limited 2011 Slide 1.3 Definitions of strategy (1) • ‘..the determination of the long-run goals and objectives of an enterprise and the adoption of courses of action and the allocation of resource necessary for carrying out these goals’ Alfred Chandler • ‘Competitive strategy is about being different. It means deliberately choosing a different set of activities to deliver a unique mix of value’ Michael Porter Sources: A.D. Chandler, Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of American Enterprise, MIT Press, 1963, p. 13 M.E. Porter, ‘What is strategy?’, Harvard Business Review, 1996, November–December, p. 60 Johnson, Whittington and Scholes, Exploring Strategy, 9th Edition, © Pearson Education Limited 2011 Slide 1.4 Definitions of strategy (2) • ‘..a pattern in a stream of decisions’...

Words: 1670 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Strategy

...that there was a difference between operational effectiveness. Operational effectiveness measures competency and how well a company outperforms its rivals, but a large part of strategy implements evolution and differentiating amongst competitors. As Michael E. Porter states, “A company can outperform rivals only if it can establish a difference that it can preserve” (Porter 2010, p. 3). In addition, a great deal of strategic positioning is to know the market and deliver the needs of demands. For example, Southwest provides a first come first serve seating and allows its customers to check in 2 bags for free, while Spirit Airlines have the lowest deals in most flights, but charges their customers a fee for any carry on bags or checked in luggage. American Airlines and affiliates offer wifi and complimentary drinks on flights and JetBlue has Direct TV for its customers. I use these examples because I travel back and forth from California and Oregon, and have observed these features on many airlines. I find it very applicable to the topic of strategy. Each and every airline has its distinguishable features as incentives for customers to choose them over their rivalries. My perception of strategy has evolved in that I have applied many of the previous discussions we have had in the past with strategy and effective implementation. I find it hard to successfully carry forth strategic planning and success within a company without great leadership, management and an understanding...

Words: 532 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Strategy

...Question 1 (strategy game): You have managed your camera company in the virtual industry environment for seven “years” together with your co-managers. As an individual now, and with the benefit of hindsight, if you were to start again from Year 6, what would you do differently in your strategy and in your management, and why? Note: the game is clearly a means to an end, and what I’ll be looking for in your answer is that you use your “toolkit”, which you have acquired from Strategy and from other courses in this GXMBA. Also, the question is about company strategy and its deployment, not about internal group organization. GO TO ANSWER Article 1 - Home Depot Earnings Beat, Raises Outlook Published: Tuesday, 13 Nov 2012 | 6:33 AM ET By: CNBC.com With Reuters Home Depot raised its full-year outlook on Tuesday as the retailer benefited from a recent uptick in the U.S. housing market and analysts expect a sales boost from super storm Sandy in the current quarter. The nascent recovery in housing has encouraged professional contractors to buy more in recent months. Home Depot, the world's largest home improvement chain, has also gained from its own efforts to improve distribution, cut costs and localize marketing and merchandising. Excluding a charge for closing seven stores in China, Home Depot said it had earned 74 cents per share. Analysts had been expecting 70 cents a share, according to Thomson Reuters I/B/E/S. Third-quarter revenue...

Words: 2710 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

Strategy

...J U LY 2 0 12 strategy practice Becoming more strategic: Three tips for any executive Michael Birshan and Jayanti Kar You don’t need a formal strategy role to help shape your organization’s strategic direction. Start by moving beyond frameworks and communicating in a more engaging way. We are entering the age of the strategist. As our colleagues Chris Bradley, Lowell Bryan, and Sven Smit have explained in “Managing the strategy journey” (on mckinseyquarterly.com), a powerful means of coping with today’s more volatile environment is increasing the time a company’s top team spends on strategy. Involving more senior leaders in strategic dialogue makes it easier to stay ahead of emerging opportunities, respond quickly to unexpected threats, and make timely decisions. This is a significant change. At a good number of companies, corporate strategy has long represented the bland aggregation of strategies that individual business unit heads put forward.1 At others, it’s been the domain of a small coterie, perhaps led by a chief strategist who is protective of his or her domain—or the exclusive territory of a CEO. Rare is the company, though, where all members of the top team have well-developed strategic muscles. Some executives reach the C-suite because of functional expertise, while others, including 1 In a McKinsey Global Survey of more than 2,000 global executives, only one-third agreed that their corporate strategy approach represented “a...

Words: 2520 - Pages: 11

Premium Essay

Strategy

...evaluates and controls the business and the industries in which the company is involved; assesses its competitors and sets goals and strategies to meet all existing and potential competitors; and then reassesses each strategy annually or quarterly [i.e. regularly] to determine how it has been implemented and whether it has succeeded or needs replacement by a new strategy to meet changed circumstances, new technology, new competitors, a new economic environment., or a new social, financial, or political environment. ------------------------------------------------- Strategic Management – An Ongoing Process by GE Consult on Wednesday, December 16, 2009 at 8:59am December 16, 2009  by Fred Victor  The term “globalization” is not new, what is more, it is more rapid and pervasive nowadays. Significant reductions in barriers to international commerce since the mid-1970s have resulted in markets and industries becoming increasingly integrated across nations. In fact, distance is becoming a shrinking barrier. Markets are globalizing rapidly, due to technological advancement particularly in computer technology, as are the firms that competing. As a result, strategic management will be more significant as the pace of business nowadays.  Managing change has become the "silver bullet" in seeking the final component of successfully managing strategy, process, culture and people in most modern organizations. Furthermore, staying competitive in the face of demographic trends, technological...

Words: 642 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Strategy

...Book: Be Different or Be Dead by Roy Osing ISBN: 9781626753150 http://www.amazon.com/dp/1894694694/?tag=sounexecbooks-20 This book is an A to Z business strategy guide, including how to create strategic game plan, elements of execution and staying alive in the competition. Author basically has 2 main objectives for readers to reach. The first is to provide a guide for the execution journey and provide a process to follow. One of the lesson I learned from that is, If you commit to the process, It will deliver executional competency to you in your business life even individually. The second is give more information about the conversation about strategic planning. Just from a different point of view by not completely destroying the traditional planning model, main purpose is to shift the balance between where you or your company want to go, and how you intend to get there. I learned a lot more how to create a strategic game plan. Author lists the possible issues you may be facing, and gives keywords for fast implementation. He also states that focusing the critical elements of execution and keeping all these things easy, play an important role for your act. In addition to that author encourages readers to user their leadership intelligent. Author also lists the questions that we need to ask during the journey, and we have to keep these answers always updated along the way: How big you want to be, how do you want to serve and how will you compete to win. Deciding how big you...

Words: 827 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Business Strategy with Military Strategy

... MAN4120 Exercise 1A: Compare Business Strategy with Military Strategy Ranking the nine military maxims: 1= most important 9= least important Top 9 Maxims: 9= Simplicity-prepare clear, uncomplicated plans and clear, concise orders to ensure thorough understanding Plans are important. Strategic management relies on strategies that are first formulated, implemented and than evaluated for success. This is the most important. 8= Objective- direct every military operation towards a clearly defined, decisive, and attainable objective After plans are formulated in a general scope, now objectives or goals are also formulated in order for it to be implemented and achieved. 7= Unity of Command-for every objective, ensure unity of effort under the responsible commander In business, we have organizational structure. Strategic plans are executed by certain people with duties such as management and employees. Without this type of structure, there is no way of directing the path of success. 6=Offensive-seize, retain, and exploit the initiative At this point, strategy can now be implemented after planning. 5= Maneuver-place the enemy in a disadvantageous position through the flexible application of combat power. Part of implementing strategies, placing competitors in a disadvantage by having “competitive advantage” 4= Mass-concentrate combat power at the decisive place and time Also, part of strategy implementation, deciding when to execute goals...

Words: 314 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

The Importance of Strategy

...The Importance of Strategy Most corporations would purport to have a well defined strategy which they have developed to take their business forward. Often however strategy is confused with operational planning, planning focused on delivering a more effective outcome for the business as it exists and not about positioning the company for the future. So widgets are made with ever increasing efficiency until the time comes when no one wants widgets like the company makes them any longer and a once proud company is consumed by its wily competitor or ceases to exist. Strategy is about planning to reach a vision which differentiates a company from its competitors in a positive way. It encompasses overall direction as well as the many detailed activities that occur in a company. Strategic success generally depends on possessing an enlightened and unique vision as well as doing the many things needed to achieve the vision well. If one focuses too much on the activities often the vision is lost, likewise if the focus on the vision is too intense then the operational matters are neglected resulting in across the board problems in personnel, quality, poor productivity, and so on. Indeed, ask any manager to define his or her idea of strategy and one will invariably be given a raft of answers as the person struggles to differentiate between corporate strategy and operational planning. Thus whilst one may be given the answer that the “corporate strategy” is to improve quality over a 2 year...

Words: 932 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Turnaround Strategy

...The two broad turnaround strategies that may be followed by Public and Private companies are Strategic and Operating. Strategic turnarounds can be branched into activities that comprises of a change in business strategy for competing in the same business and those that involve for entering a new business or businesses. Operating strategies does not involve altering the business level strategies and usually focuses on increasing revenues, decreasing cost, decreasing assets or a combination effort. Our research work mainly focuses on existing corporates that applies Strategic turnaround strategies to reverse a major decline in their performance. Repositioning Strategy Repositioning is an entrepreneurial strategy that puts its emphasis on growth and innovation. This strategy answers the declining situation in an organization by devising out a new definition of the mission and its core activities. The organization  can choose to stay and become more dominant in the existing market or by diversifying itself into new markets and products. In some of the cases the management may think that the current resource capabilities of a company can achieve a greater competitive advantage, if applied to a new market segment by successfully integrating and making a fit between the capabilities of the firm and the external environment. The repositioning strategy acknowledges the notion of diversification and provides an opportunity for a firm to leverage on it existing resources such as financial...

Words: 807 - Pages: 4