...Should we keep birthright citizenship? Should we ratify the 14th amendment? These are the two main arguments in the articles “Birthright Citizenship in the United States” by Jon Feere and “Policy Arguments in Favor of Retaining America’s Birthright Citizenship Law” by Margaret Stock. The 14th amendment does not give clear requirements on who is given birthright citizenship. The 14th amendment simply states “All persons born of naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States, and of the state wherein they reside.” In the article favoring the retainment of birthright citizenship states that changing the policy would not solve any problems but instead create problems. The purposed changes would bring administrative and legal burdens to every American. America practices jus solis or...
Words: 1186 - Pages: 5
...The Birthright Citizenship Amendment is one that has caused controversy. Should a person that is born in the US, regardless of whether the parents were here temporarily, or illegally be considered an American citizen? The 14th Amendment states “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the States wherein they reside”, ( Spalding, 2010). The interpretation of this amendment has caused the controversy. Those opposed to ending the clause in the Birthright Citizenship Amendment argue “The framers' intent was to create an objective basis for establishing citizenship—birth—not a subjective standard left to the whim of a majority. The United States has, for that reason, never struggled like other nations to integrate those born here” ( Fitz, 2010). These people feel that the children born here will always feel stigmatized if not accepted as an American citizen, and this will do more harm than good for our nation. Those who seek to end this clause have a different perspective “It violates bedrock American principles and undermines the rule of law” ( Spalding, 2010). He goes on to say that he has no problem with legal immigrants having children who are automatically given birthright citizenship, but this right should exclude illegal immigrants or temporary visitors. I tend to agree with Spalding on this. I do not feel it is fair or beneficial to give Birthright Citizenship...
Words: 711 - Pages: 3
...When it comes to the topic of denying birthright citizenship to the American-born children of illegal immigrants, I strongly disagree due to the reason being that they too are entitled to every opportunity and freedom that the United States has to offer. If we do proceed in the process of revising the 14th amendment and move forward with everything that wants to be done in denying the citizenship of these children it will greatly affect our future in the sense that our workforce will go down due to the working of the illegal immigrants residing in the United States, that would later be deported back to their mother country, and therefore decreasing and destabilizing our economy. When it comes to the efforts that are being put forth for denying citizenship to these children I feel it is more so cruel & unnecessary because we are a country that was built up and based upon a nation of freedom and opportunity. When one really steps back and...
Words: 547 - Pages: 3
...Illegal immigration, citizenship, and peoples rights are all things many people don’t know much about, and some things people know aren’t completely true, what they do know is usually someone else’s perspective rather than the truth. I hope that this essay sheds more light on what the law of soil, the law of blood, birthright citizenship, anchor babies, illegal immigrants, the 13 amendment, and the 14th amendment really are. There are four ways you can gain United States citizenship, one of these is by being born in the united states or one of its territories, another way is for both of your parents to be American citizens. Third, you can be a citizen through the naturalization process, which generally involves applying for, and passing,...
Words: 465 - Pages: 2
...as it was posted in the politically conservative section of the Wall Street Journal. Before I read the political background section of Linda Chavez, I had thought the author to be liberal. But after reading the excerpt I the beginning of the publication, I noticed that she was a Hispanic Conservative. I could tell that Linda Chavez did not expect her audience to agree with her when she stated that “Repealing birthright citizenship is a terrible idea.” Most conservatives wish to dismiss birthright citizenship, but in this passage she explains the significance of it, and what it would do to the future of the nation. 4. One example is when she explains the origins of birthright citizenship dating back to 1898 with the Chinese. She also states the first immigration restrictions on the Chinese due to the Chinese Exclusion Act of 1882. Another example of Chavez that states upon American History is the Supreme Court Case U.S v. Wong Kim Ark. These statements support her argument by giving actual representation within early American History of a case/example involving birthright citizenship. Through her appeal to logos with these statements of American History it makes the audience evoke a much rational, cognitive response. Therefore her statements made in the story are very convincing due to a real reference from history. Style and Structure 2. I believe that the logical fallacy Chavez claims that her opponents commit is the belief that the Fourteenth Amendment was passed for the...
Words: 939 - Pages: 4
...ARGUMENTS AGAINST DETERMINISM: MAN IS FREE, NO MORE, NO LESS INTRODUCTION The issues of Freedom and Determinism have been sensitive issues that have sparked off heated debates throughout history. The question whether man is really free has been a hard nut to crack and as a result of this, many attempts have been made by different individuals from both philosophical and theological point of view in their effort to explain and understand this concept ‘Freedom’. The line of thought that supports the notion of free will is also called libertarianism. DEFINITION OF CONCEPTS Before delving into the argument, it is worthy of note that the terms under discussion be given a definition for a better understanding of the terms. According to Advanced Learners’ Dictionary, determinism is the belief that people are not free to choose what they are like or how they behave because these things are decided by their background, surroundings and other things over which they have no control. It is simply the view that man is not free, that his actions are determined by certain causes. On another note, libertarianism according to the same source is the belief that people should have the freedom to do and think as they like. Freedom is simply man’s capacity to take hand in his own development. Concentrating more on the major object of my argument which is against determinism, the concept freedom was supported by both philosophers and theologians throughout history. On the part of the philosophers...
Words: 1742 - Pages: 7
...Immigration and Birthright Citizenship Many people feel the issue on immigration and birthright citizenship may have become a touchy subject. Some people argue that the undocumented citizens or illegal immigrants steal jobs away from rightful US citizens. Also people say that the undocumented citizens want to have a baby in the United States of America with the assumption they will grant US citizenship to them as a family. In certain states the police were allowed to stop anyone that they felt to not hold US citizenship just by looking at them. With this thinking different ethnic groups have been looked down on and even discriminated against. Some people just see the color of the person and form an opinion against a certain group of people, mainly minority groups, without knowing their true status. The fourteenth Amendment provides citizenship to the child of anyone who gives birth in the United States of America. Elizabeth Wydra, Chief Counsel, of the American accountability center writes, “the words and history of this constitutional text establish that it provides automatic citizenship-"birthright citizenship"-to anyone born in this country regardless of race, color or status of one's parents or ancestors.”(Wydra) Some people argue by doing this undocumented immigrants gain access to America by slipping through the cracks. “Along with the grand statements supporting liberty and equality, ethnic stereotypes and racial hostility were also on full display in the debates...
Words: 988 - Pages: 4
...married. I have some very close friends who are gay and have been together for 4-5 years. I think they should not be denied the same rights as heterosexual couples who choose to be married. Some states have already put into law that homosexual couples may be married. Ohio is not one of those states. These couples should be allowed the same benefits as heterosexual married couples. Health insurance is currently denied these couples unless they work in a facility that recognizes same sex couples on their employee benefits. Another benefit homosexual couples are denied is the death benefit. My step-mom knows a couple who could not see each other as one of them was dying because the family would not allow it. Who does it hurt if they get married? That is my issue. Gay couples are not allowed to be married in the state of Ohio. There is a ban on same sex marriages and a law which defines marriage as that between one man and one woman. Some states have domestic partnership laws which state that a couple of the same sex or opposite sex may enjoy the same benefits of married couples, but still may not be married. Opponents of this law say it is not fair. They say it is like the old Jim Crow laws of racial inequality. My step-mom said many refer to this law as separate, but equal. When speaking of death benefits, I am not speaking of life insurance. You can put anyone you want down as beneficiary on your life insurance. I am talking about the right to be with your loved...
Words: 763 - Pages: 4
...should not reward parents who have their children in the US illegally. By granting their children citizenship we are inviting illegal immigrants to flock to our country for a free citizenship incentives. As closing proposition I would like to deconstruct the opposition’s arguments stating that EVERY SINGLE ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS CHILD SHOULD BE GRANTED CITIZENSHIP. I would also like to crystalize my opening proposition’s remarks and in addition, construct some new arguments and offer some solutions. Granting citizenship to the children of illegal immigrants makes illegally crossing into America a goal Well over 300,000 babies are born in America EVERY YEAR to illegal immigrants. These parents sneak into America illegally. Totally ignoring our laws that we as LEGAL citizens are obligated to uphold. Totally undermining our citizenship by taking advantage of the benefits that America offers, all while not paying taxes and not adhering to our government. How do we punish these criminals? By granting their children immediate and full citizenship. They are afforded every benefit America has to offer. Food stamps, well fair, public education, healthcare, and every other government program we have. They almost will certainly be using these benefits because as an illegal immigrant you are not permitted to work in the US. It’s easy to see why immigrants are sneaking into America: if they establish themselves with a legal citizen baby they are afforded a better life here by taking advantage...
Words: 1194 - Pages: 5
...thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside.” This right bestowed by the Fourteenth Amendment of jus soli citizenship has been controversial because of the “anchor baby” phenomenon. An “anchor baby” is a pejorative term for a citizen of the United States who was born to a mother whose status is illegal, in order that the baby might serve as an “anchor” for the mother to the US. Because this state of affairs is thought to encourage illegal immigration, especially by pregnant women, there have been calls to amend the Fourteenth Amendment. No such amendment should take place, and the right to all people born in the United States to unabridged citizenship should be reaffirmed. One of the primary concerns with birthright citizenship is the...
Words: 722 - Pages: 3
...teachings of God and has to read the Bible since, we are not born with the information of religion. This gives reasonable doubt in his argument because of the fact if God gave everything else to man as a birthright then why would one need outside influences to learn of The Creator? Another reason I believe the Old Man has the better argument is because, when he states instinct is a “rule that applies itself to habits and impulses” (Twain, 46), I believe he has some merit. For example, when one gets in trouble with the law they blame their actions on an impulse that ultimately made them do the bad deed. For instance, if one steals another persons property their excuse is usually that the stolen items were available to steal so they decided to just take them, this of course does not include the Young Mans argument that morality is something everyone is born with. In conclusion, I believe that the Old Man provided ample examples of how Man truly is a machine which is why he contained the better argument. His opinions that outside influences make up the attributions that in turn create the machine, training helps determine the human being as well because it teaches you how to behave and what type of thought process to have, and the Young Mans argument that everything Man has is a birthright falls flat because man must be taught everything to know things such as right and wrong....
Words: 617 - Pages: 3
...Clinton wants to introduce a type of immigration reform which considers current citizens as well as newcomers. (2)She plans to eliminate 3 to 10 year bans so that families are not put in the sad position of having to leave the US to get a green card. The 3 to 10 year bans are a law that keeps immigrants out of the country for 3 to 10 years if they were previously in the country illegally. If she cannot get the comprehensive immigration reform immediately, Clinton will pass a system for those with particularly sympathetic cases. She will subsequently end family and immigrant detention centers, (3)which are mandatory detainment centers while the immigrant waits for they are waiting for the results of their and support immigrant integration. Hillary Clinton proposes the creation of an Office of Immigrant Affairs to better organize all matters related to immigration. She will increase resources for adults to learn the English language and earn citizenship. She wants to promote naturalization and give more affordable access...
Words: 997 - Pages: 4
...1966, and it has often crossed my mind that had I been conceived a few years later, would I have been put up for adoption, or never been born at all? Nevertheless, I am one of many who are being deprived of one of the most basic human rights of all. In explanation, I am adopted, and because of archaic laws, created in some cases over 100 years ago, the right I am being denied is my birthright. This birthright is being withheld from an estimated six million adult adoptees in the United States. The basic right to know where you came from, to know who you look like, to know who gave birth to you, and, ultimately, to know why you were given away. I was blessed to have been adopted by incredibly loving parents, and even though I had a wonderful upbringing, I always wondered who I look like, my biological mother? Father? Just as the United States has moved forward with regard to race relations, single, unmarried women having children has also become increasingly accepted. The “Age of Secrecy” and original adoption laws reflected conditions of years ago. In early society, to be an unwed mother was something shameful, and to be an illegitimate bastard was egregious. Adoption laws were...
Words: 990 - Pages: 4
...of illegal alien parents. These children, via their birthright citizenship, act as anchor babies and can, upon reaching the age of majority, facilitate bringing their extended family into the US in order to obtain citizenship. Although some experts believe that a Constitutional amendment would be necessary to remedy the misinterpretation, many believe that Congressional action would be sufficient and is urgently warranted. Passed by Congress June 13, 1866. Ratified July 9, 1868. “Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.” Babies born to illegal alien mothers within U.S. borders are called anchor babies because under the 1965 immigration Act, they act as an anchor that pulls the illegal alien mother and eventually a host of other relatives into permanent U.S. residency. The United States did not limit immigration in 1868 when the Fourteenth Amendment was ratified. Thus there were, by definition, no illegal immigrants and the issue of citizenship for children of those here in violation of the law was nonexistent. Granting of automatic citizenship...
Words: 364 - Pages: 2
...Essay Outline Introduction (Paragraph I): a. Is racism still alive? b. Over the past years my views on racism has changed. When I was younger, I didn’t notice the racism as much as I do now. Body Paragraph 2 a. Source I i. Why Conservatives should oppose Racial Profiling ii. Racial profiling oppresses the African American population iii. The justice system is tailored for white men, the minorities just have to assimilate Body Paragraph 3 a. Source 2 I. Maryland Restricts Racial Profiling in New Guidelines for Law Enforcement II. Maryland law requires law enforcement agencies to have policies prohibiting racial and ethnic profiling during traffic stops III. There are people with different viewpoints on if racial profiling still exists IV. ''Racial profiling continues despite the fact that it is against the law of the United States; it's against Maryland law,'' Body Paragraph 4 b. Source 3 V. Why Racism Still Flourishes VI. “our faltering efforts to deal with race in this country, a great deal of time is devoted to responding to symptoms rather than root causes. That may help explain why racism keeps repeating itself.” VII. Examples are pointed out; in colleges racism has occurred. VIII. “The United States has been treating evidence of racism, and not the causes, since the Civil War.” Body Paragraph 5, 6, 7, etc Conclusion * Clarify what you now think of your issue. ...
Words: 1694 - Pages: 7
