Free Essay

The Success of Alexander the Great

In:

Submitted By jon6198600
Words 1280
Pages 6
The true Success of Alexander the Great When historians are asked to consider the most incredible military strategist of all time the answer will typically be Alexander the Great, not only for his immeasurable military strategy skills, which were impressive during his life time, but for his overwhelming achievements that had managed to impact history thousands of years later. Alexander the Great was so successful because from the beginning of his life all the way up until his final moments he lived solely to prove himself as the almighty conqueror of Asia. From a young age alexander became aware of many elements of the world through his education. When he got his start as a ruler many fortunate events occurred and encouraged his progression. The real genius of Alexander the Great was through his infamous military formation known simply as the phalanx. It was this impenetrable formation and Alexander’s own deceivingly simple ideologies that secured his successes. Early on in Alexander’s life many knew his ultimate goal was to conqueror all of Asia, and it became clear once his undefeated record started growing that he truly had the capacity to tackle such an aspiration. When Alexander was approximately thirteen years of age he became a student of the widely renowned philosopher, Aristotle. Alexander’s father, Phillip II, went out of his way to acquire the famous philosopher for his son’s education. Not only was Alexander becoming increasingly aware of the sciences and mathematics with the help of his teacher, but he was also in the presence of a strong military power: his own father. Phillip II of Macedonia was a conqueror himself, and a successful one at that. It is no surprise that his own son became such a successful military strategist. During this time in history it is important to note that many famous rulers died prematurely, some were assassinated on the battlefield and others were poisoned within the supposedly safe walls of the kingdom they governed. A serious conqueror who had built a strong kingdom with increasingly growing territories, such as Phillip II of Macedonia, would have to be prepared with a successor to continue their legacy. Naturally, Phillip II was afraid of losing what he had strategically gained, so he reacted by preparing his own son to take over his life’s work, beginning of course with the teachings of Aristotle. After the death of Alexander’s father a sequence of events magically fell into place for the twenty year old novice ruler. Phillip II had already planned a takeover of Persia before his untimely death, and even though he himself was unable to act on what he had planned, his son was able to fulfill his plans and then some. Honor existed in the footprint you left behind, in other words, a man’s worth was determined by how great his rule was. Though Phillip II was considered successful, there is a reason Alexander the Great is considered the ultimate legend of military history. He conquered an area and then appointed someone he entrusted to govern because he was aware that he could not be the only defining power across Asia (Arrian 154). His accomplishments cannot be denied by anyone, only recognized as the successes they are. It is not a matter of whether Alexander was successful, but rather how to attribute his successes. One of the most well-known facets of Alexander the Greats army was his phalanx. This military strategy was one of the main reasons Alexander lost very little men in battle, especially compared to all the casualties of the opposing states. This unique formation blocked all attacks from in front and above with ease, leaving very little room for attack and very little time for the enemy to come up with a way to actually fight off the rapidly approaching army. On more than a few occasions Alexander encircled his victims and mercilessly left all but a handful dead. Almost like a game of chess, as soon as the opposing side thought they had somehow outsmarted Alexander the Great and his legendary army they were proven wrong, and their defenses all came tumbling down as Alexander countered with a level of efficiency that was simply unmatched by any other leader of his time. Not only was the phalanx practically impenetrable, but Alexander also greatly utilized archers for long distance kills. Often times the area Alexander was trying to conqueror would retreat, sometimes even practicing “scorched earth” which left Alexander’s army nothing to steal once they took over a city, unfortunately for those who retreated they also lost everything in a vain attempt to thwart Alexander’s growing rule in Asia. Arrian seems to attribute many of Alexander the Greats more acclaimed victories to his unusually simple military ideologies. For instance, when he advanced on the city of Tyre, which geographically is surrounded by water on all sides, he ran into an obvious predicament. He was able to acquire a few boats, but not enough to carry his entire army. Usually if a group of people need to get over a body of water they simply cross a bridge, but in this case there was no bridge. The people of Tyre seemed to laugh at Alexander’s toils until they realized the bold plan the great conqueror had concocted. His soldiers were building a bridge. This example of his daring simplicity is part of what separated the successes of Alexander the Great from other conquerors and famous military strategists. The real icing on the cake was the fact that after Alexander and his army had finally taken control of Tyre, he had also successfully occupied a final territory boarding the Mediterranean Sea, putting him one step closer to his goal of taking over all of Asia. From the moment Alexander took over control of Macedonia he was driven by a desire to prove himself. A strong reputation went a long way throughout Asia. The Persian rulers, first Xerxes and then Darius III, had established themselves as rulers of some of the strongest warring people. Alexander the Great wanted nothing more but to defeat the Persians and then follow up by conquering the rest of Asia, this must have been especially difficult for anyone at this time to comprehend because no one knew exactly how far Asia stretched. In fact, after Alexander had truly done the unthinkable and conquered all of his adversaries he still marched his troops in a vain attempt to capture more. As mentioned in Arrian: The campaigns of Alexander in regards to the character of Alexander the Great himself, “…he was brave and adventurous, strict in the observance of his religious duties, and hungry for fame.” (Arrian 395). The great strategist actually had more casualties due to starvation and dehydration then any battle leading up to his final moments, though Ptolemy leaves Alexander’s demise to illness while traveling further into unknown lands. Alexander’s death at thirty two years of age is a clear example of his attitude toward what he believed he was meant to accomplish. The successes of Alexander the Great have been recognized by all who have appreciated his individual style. The uniqueness and absolute cunning involved in each military decision he made is what ultimately lead to his fame. Each step involved, whether it be taking Tyre or taking Persia, was perfectly executed by all his soldiers and flawlessly delivered by Alexander himself. From beginning to end, Alexander the Great lived for his title and his honor, and that is truly what his successes should be attributed to.

Word Count: 1,289
Works Cited
Arrianus, Flavius, Aubrey De. Sélincourt, and J. R. Hamilton. Arrian: The Campaigns of
Alexander. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1976. Print.

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Alexander the Great

...Alexander the Great, son of Philip II, king of Macedon, and Olympias, has left an everlasting footprint on history. From the time he was born to the moment he died he was extraordinary; he was a warrior by the age of 16, a war commander by the age of 18 and was king at age 20. He single-handedly- in attempt to finish a mission his father had started- changed the nature of the ancient western world. He was born in Pella in 356 in the summer months. There he spent his childhood watching his father turn his kingdom into a military machine. Under the guidance of Aristotle he was able to learn skills that would help him to become a vast ruler. Few historical figures have stuck out to be a great person of influence on the world of today. From the time he was born to the day he died, Alexander the great has lived one of the most influential lives in history. Throughout his life he was able to conquer lands no other man could. “Alexander, king of Macedonians, whose spectacular career of conquest made him arguably the most famous secular leader in history, remains an enduring and controversial figure in European and western Asian history, folklore, and art. From the Atlantic to India, there is hardly a people who have not incorporated into their public consciousness some aspect-real or imagined, friendly or hostile-of Alexander’s exploits” (Foreman 13). Alexander the Great has true historical significance because he spread Greek language and culture throughout his empire, was a...

Words: 1048 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Alexander the Great

...Alexander the Great Alexander the Great is well known for accomplishing far more than kings before and after him. He was born in Pella, Macedonia in 356 B.C.E. In his childhood, he watched his father transform Macedonia into a great military power. King Phillip was his father, and Olympias was his mother. She was the princess of Epirus and was a deeply spiritual being. She taught her son about his ancestors, including Achilles and Hercules. Even as a young boy, Alexander was conditioned for battle and glory. He was fearless and strong, and he put his efforts on becoming a great ruler. At age twelve, he trained a horse named Bucephalus, whom no one else could ride. His father was very proud of him and his steady efforts. Aristotle came to Pella in 343 at Philip’s bidding to offer his knowledge. Aristotle taught Alexander from age thirteen to sixteen at the Mieza Temple. He had a strong, athletic build but was still shorter than the average man. He had fair skin and was clean-shaven. He had green eyes and was considered by many to be handsome. When he led his army, he would always wear something vibrant that could be seen from long distances by his enemies. Alexander wore two large white plumes in his hat to set himself apart from the other soldiers. On a normal day, he would wear silk Persian clothing, consisting of a long robe, cape, sash, and headband in royal purple and white. Alexander the Great had much respect for women and treated them fairly. These thoughts might...

Words: 907 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Alexander Hamilton Research Paper

..."Who lives, who dies, who tells your story?" was not the original concern for the great Alexander Hamilton. Not believing that he could live past twenty, this man went on to accomplish many great things and convince New Yorkers to agree to ratify the U.S. Constitution. The brilliant work of Hamilton was displayed through the masterful musical "Hamilton" created by Lin-Manuel Miranda. As Niccoló Machiavelli claims, a politician's success relies on two factors; his own abilities or skills and his external circumstances. These hold true for what led Alexander Hamilton to successes. "By fourteen, they placed him in charge of a trading charter" (Alexander Hamilton, Miranda). The trading charter involved dealing with associations formed by investors...

Words: 1758 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Alexander The Great Research Paper

...Alexander The Great Alexander the Great has had his name up for debate for a long period of time. People wonder “Is Alexander the Great really that great?” Alexander isn’t great, or is he? Alexander shows traits of respect towards others, he conquered the Persian Empire by himself, and he left behind an unforgettable legacy. Alexander the Great isn’t just great, he is amazing. Alexander conquered the Persian Empire. The Persian Empire was the largest, greatest, most advanced empire of its time. For Alexander to win against it is an amazing feat on its own. But not only did he win once, he beat Persia a total of three times, and took it as part of his empire. His second battle against Persia was very interesting. Persia’s army was lead...

Words: 694 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Comparing Alexander The Great's Life And Success

...Alexander the Great Alexander the Great, son of King Philip II and Queen Olympia and born in Macedonia on July 20th, 356, developed into a strong and influential explorer and conqueror who was respected by many. Much of his early education and success can be attributed to being tutored by Aristotle, the famous philosopher. Alexander rarely saw his father, who was often engaged with military-related activities. He was raised by his mother and although he enjoyed being with her, Alexander grew to resent his father for being absent in his early life. His mother even attempted to turn Alexander against his father due to his absence and lack of morality. However, even though Alexander resented his father, he still had true admiration for him and followed his...

Words: 483 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

The Greeks

...But before Alexander achieved his title of being “Alexander the Great”, the genius and brilliancy of his father Phillip was where it all started. Before Phillip ascended to the throne, he was one of the hostages delivered to the Thebans as security for the peace affected by Pelopidas. Here is where Phillip learned the most important lesson, the art of warfare. With his own innovation of the Greek phalanx, it was also the first time cavalry was intertwined with the combination of light infantry, slingers, archers, and javelin men. Phillip also built an admirable corps of engineers, which conducted research alongside sieges—produced weapons such as catapults and “ram tortoises,” battery rams mounted on protected carriers. The diversity of all these forces especially the coordination between infantry and horsemen was far beyond tactical capacity during their time. According to Parker, for more than twenty years (359-338) Phillip crafted a grand new army, supply, led, and organized quite differently from anything in past Greek practice. This was a unique military force that will eventually dominate the Greek city-states and later confronted the current superpower, the Persians. While the new face of the military is being forged, it is now being sustained and improved by logistical planning. According to Parker, soldiers during one summer campaign were ordered to carry thirty days’ provisions on his back. Well supplied soldiers with food, equipment, etc., is the...

Words: 888 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Alexander The Great Research Paper

...About 330 BC ago, the Roman Empire began and died out around 1453 AD. It lasted about seven years before the death of Alexandre the Great. “The popularity of the legend of Alexander as the narrative of the height of achievement for a masculine warrior-hero served as one of his most enduring and powerful legacies to later ages” (Martin, Ancient Greece, 252). Alexandre had so many success which the Romans took noticed of and used it to conspiracy their expansion. Although many of the sources of Rome’s expansion was first presented as a sage of premediated wars of conquest (Ancient Rome, 67), when it comes to military, the Romans glean many of their military scheme from Alexander the Great. Although they had some influential ideas from Alexandre...

Words: 766 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Alexandr the Great

...Alexander the Great Alexander accomplished greater deeds than, not only of the kings who had lived before him but also of those who were to come later down to our time .Alexander the Great was born at Pella Macedonia in 356 B.C.E. He spent his childhood years watching his father transforming Macedonia into a great military power. His Father was King Phillip and his mother was Olympias. His mother was the princes of neighboring Epirus. She was a deeply spiritual who taught her son about his ancestors such as Achilles and Hercules. From his earliest ages, then he was conditioned for conquest and glory in being a king. He then became focused on becoming a great ruler, which he soon will become. As a young boy Alexander was fearless and strong. At the age of 12 he tamed a beautiful horse by the name of Bucephalus, a horse than no one else could ride. His father was so proud of him and his horsemanship. Aristotle came to Pella in 343 at Phillips bidding to direct education towards his son. Alexander was taught by him from the age thirteen to sixteen. Alexander was taught by Aristotle at the Mieza Temple.Alexander was told to have had a strong athletic build, but was shorter than the average Macedonian. He had fair skin, and was clean shaven most of the time. He had green eyes, and was said to be a very handsome man. When leading his army he would always wear something very recognizable from long distances by his enemies. Alexander wore two large white plumes in his hat to distinguish...

Words: 1021 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Alexander the Great

...Alexander The Great Alexander the Great is arguably the most famous King that has ever lived. Alexander’s historical perception is without a doubt not entirely accurate, but in the facts of his Kingdom, and in reading the few historically relevant sources, we can interpret something about the life of this man. Through the writings of Plutarch, Arrian, Curtius Rufus, and Pliny, I see Alexander the Great as a justly motivated, intelligent military hero. We will never truly know how Alexander would have turned out as a ruler due to his early death, but in his fifteen years as king he motivated people from different cultures and different countries to come together and execute, under his rule, the most impressive military conquests the world has ever seen. Many modern historians, including those in the ETEP module, have differing views of Alexander the Great. Some claim that he was a deranged, bloodthirsty general who only sought personal triumph, while others thought that he was a military hero who sought unity among all men. W.W. Tarn was a proponent of the latter statement, who wrote about Alexander’s lasting impact of blending culture in the East. Tarn notices that there are many conflicting sources with regards to Alexander’s triumph, and focus’s more on the positive impact that Alexander left on the Eastern world. I agree with Tarn in that Alexander’s conquers led to cultures coming together and advancing at a rate that otherwise would have been unattainable....

Words: 1322 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Alexander the Great: the Quest to Be Greater

...Alexander the Great was a conqueror and King of Macedonia prior to the Hellenistic Period. He succeeded to the throne after Phillip II of Macedon’s death brought his reign to an end. However, the continuance of the promised legacy his father left behind did not satisfy this power crazed King for fame and glory. Alexander the Great’s resentment towards his father led him to continue conquering because he wanted to overshadow his father. Under his headship, his unification of Greek city-states led to one of the largest empires known today. Alexander was born in the summer of 356 B.C. to Phillip II King of Macedon and Olympias of Epirus. Born into a royal household with a great military leader as the head of it, Alexander spent most of his early childhood watching a distant father transform Macedonia. Alexander was always left behind for his father’s military conquests and expansion. “Whenever he heard of Philip's having taken some city or won some famous victory, he used to look unhappy at the news, and would say to his friends, "Boys, my father will forestall us in everything; he will leave no great exploits for you and me to achieve." Indeed, he cared nothing for pleasure or wealth, but only for honour and glory; and he imagined that the more territory he inherited from his father, the less would be left for him to conquer.” Alexander realized that his father’s absence meant that he was out conquering ("Plutrach Lives: The Life of Alexander" p. 304). This led to tension between...

Words: 1224 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Alexander the Great

...From the ages of antiquity and to the present, Alexander is described as a military genius. His accomplishments in the art of war were and still are astounding. Hannibal, Caesar, Frederick, and Napoleon studied his military methods thoroughly and all admitted that without the knowledge they gained from Alexander the Great they would have never been able to accomplish what they did. From one great leader, Napoleon, we hear, “Make offensive war like Alexander, Hannibal, Caesar … read and re-read the history of their campaigns. Model yourself on them … that is the only way to become a great captain.” Invariable were his countless successes, whether he fought against disciplined, highly trained troops or guerilla bands of wild hill tribes, on plains or on mountains, deserts, ravines, marshes or rivers, winter snow or burning sun; weather and darkness were not obstacles. Alexander never wasted time. He always arrived before his enemies expected. His men followed him for more than 21,000 miles because they believed he had their best interests in mind. They always counted on him to lead them to victory after victory and he never failed. There are many reasons that have been presented of how and why Alexander won every one of his battles. He would achieve his victories by first investigating the land where he wished to advance upon. In order to be sure of the safety of himself and his army he would often explore alone over dangerous terrain. In order for men to respect and follow...

Words: 2231 - Pages: 9

Free Essay

A Leader

...Alexander the Great is one of the most extraordinary and inscrutable warriors of all time. By the age of 30 he was ruler of one of the largest empires ever known. From Greece to ancient India, Alexander single-handedly joined East and West together and forever changed the ancient world. Alexander the warrior is only one part of his legacy. He was a celebrated leader with a unique early life that drove his passion, admirable traits that set him apart from other rulers, and an unquestionable mark on history that continues to be praised today. Education and good mentoring are both vital for the pedigree of a good leader. Alexander had both. Being the son of a king, from an early age Alexander was given access to and was educated by the well-known Greek philosopher, Aristotle. It was his proximity to this great thinker during Alexander’s developmental years that inspired a deep love for rhetoric and literature, which led to interests in science, medicine, and philosophy. Education set Alexander apart from his peers; it also established him as one with the ability to transfer something of worth to another, namely Hellenism. Adding to education, Aristotle introduced Alexander to the legend of the Greek god, Achilles, through Homer’s, The Iliad. To Alexander, Achilles became a sort of distant mentor and idol to emulate. Alexander studied how Achilles fought, lived, loved, and died; desiring the same for his own life Alexander would vicariously model it as such. A good...

Words: 754 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Alexander

...Alexander the Great Alexander accomplished greater deeds than, not only of the kings who had lived before him but also of those who were to come later down to our time .Alexander the Great was born at Pella Macedonia in 356 B.C.E. He spent his childhood years watching his father transforming Macedonia into a great military power. His Father was King Phillip and his mother was Olympias. His mother was the princes of neighboring Epirus. She was a deeply spiritual who taught her son about his ancestors such as Achilles and Hercules. From his earliest ages, then he was conditioned for conquest and glory in being a king. He then became focused on becoming a great ruler, which he soon will become. As a young boy Alexander was fearless and strong. At the age of 12 he tamed a beautiful horse by the name of Bucephalus, a horse than no one else could ride. His father was so proud of him and his horsemanship. Aristotle came to Pella in 343 at Phillips bidding to direct education towards his son. Alexander was taught by him from the age thirteen to sixteen. Alexander was taught by Aristotle at the Mieza Temple.Alexander was told to have had a strong athletic build, but was shorter than the average Macedonian. He had fair skin, and was clean shaven most of the time. He had green eyes, and was said to be a very handsome man. When leading his army he would always wear something very recognizable from long distances by his enemies. Alexander wore two large white plumes in his hat to distinguish...

Words: 1021 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Alexander the Great, Compared to Modern Leadership

...Alexander the Great Ancient World’s Model Leader Marco Gobbato Chestnut Hill College Alexander the Great’s name went down in history as one of the most successful and most creative military strategists. He was undefeated in Battle and left many in his future attempting to mirror his success. At the young age of 16, he was entrusted with leading troops under orders from his father, Philip II. Imagine a sophomore in high school leading grown men to a possible death, how would that individual persuade his men to trust him. Although much of Alexander the Great’s biography has been lost through time, the many lasting legacies which he produced prove his existence and significance. Alexander’s conquests spanned from mainland Greece and Asia Minor, to the Nile River of Egypt, and the Frontier of the Ganges River Valley in India, a land mass covering over 5 million square Kilometers. Very soon after capturing the last remnants of the Persian Empire, Alexander the Great died at the age of 32 due to an unknown cause. All his accomplishments happened in a span of 16 years, not a very long time to reach the height to which Alexander found himself in. From a Leadership point of view, Alexander ranks among the top of the list in history, for many reasons. Not only did he pull together his resources and commanded his men with incredible accuracy of control, he maintained a working machine of cities and supply routes that provided his armies with the necessities. The only way where...

Words: 1303 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Jay Cooke and Donald Alexander Smith Comparative Essay

...recognized for his role in the financing of railroads in the northwestern United States. Donald Alexander Smith was a Canadian politician, diplomat, philanthropist and business leader who had a great deal of interest in the fur trade, railroads and banking. Jay Cooke and Donald Smith were both historical forces and instrumental in shaping the development of business. Jay Cooke was an entrepreneur who developed a method to create a productive system for government fundraising through selling bonds, whereas Donald Smith was business savvy, who strived on connections, contacts and opportunities he was faced with. The differences in conducting and operating business are very prominent but the end result in what they overall accomplished for their respective countries are very similar. The role one plays in a respective business can be very significant and allow them to achieve success and prosper. Jay Cooke and Donald Alexander Smith are two men who fall into this category, as the role they play in their businesses, Cooke and Company and the Hudson’s Bay Company (HBC), throughout their career is different but very meaningful. Donald Alexander Smith began his career immediately by obtaining an apprenticeship clerk position at the Hudson’s Bay Company, where he later began to move up the positions in eventually becoming Chief Commissioner. Smith played a very vital role in the success of HBC when they were transferring territories of the company to the government of Canada, as...

Words: 1080 - Pages: 5