Free Essay

Thomas Aquinas

In:

Submitted By lrc1977
Words 2371
Pages 10
Lenzy Cornatzer
Professor O’Neil
Introduction to Philosophy
Philosophy Engagement Paper
December 15, 2014

For many Christians understanding the early church philosophers is not something that is done on a regular basis. Philosophy is a discipline that studies and researches different topics like justice, morality, religion and reality. There are three branches of philosophy that are accepted, natural philosophy, moral philosophy and metaphysical philosophy. Philosophy is a system of principles for guidance. So how do philosophy and the Christian life intersect? One of the ways to understand that is to look at the early church philosophers that have shaped our knowledge and understanding of the scriptures. In the following paragraphs we will examine the philosopher Thomas Aquinas. Thomas had a way of understanding God that you may or may not agree with but hopefully will learn about him in the paragraphs ahead. Thomas Aquinas was an Italian Dominican theologian and philosopher that is believed by many to be one of the most influential thinkers of Scholasticism and is also know as the father of the Thomistic school of theology. Thomas Aquinas was born in the year 1225 in Roccasecca, in the Kingdom of Sicily also know as present day Italy. He combined the theological principles with the principles of reason and he is ranked by many as one of the most influential thinkers of medieval Scholasticism. Thomas was the son Landulf of Aquino and is believed to be born in his father’s castle. At the age of five Thomas began his education at Monte Cassino to train among Benedictine monks. He remained there until he was around the age of 13 when political tempers began to flare and that forced him to move to Naples. It was while he was studying at the Benedictine house in Naples that he was introduced to the work of Aristotle, Averroes and Maimondies, all of these philosophers made a great influence on his theological philosophy. In 1245 Aquinas was asked to be part of the Dominican religious and he accepted against his families will. By doing this he choose to live a life of poverty instead of doing what his family would have wanted and that was to join forces with the Benedictines. As a result of that decision his family kidnapped him and kept him a hostage at castle that he was born in for many years. During those years his family did their best to convince him that he needed to go a different route but he would not budge from his original plan. During his imprisonment, Aquinas prayed and did lots of writing. Around 1248 his family released him and he was free to go. It was then that he traveled to the Dominican novitiate at Paris to study under Albert of Lauingen, also know as Albert the Great. Albert was highly intelligent in the matters of theology and he influenced Aquinas in the practice of the synthesis of ideas and materials. Some of his studies during this time included what are now referred to Pseudo-Dionysius. One of the assignments given to Aquinas by Albert was to lecture in the Libri Qua-tuor Sententiarum written by Peter Lombard. Aquinas had commentaries on what is also called Four Books of Sentences, his commentaries ended up being some of his best work in the early years. Aquinas went on the publish a lot of his work while he was in Paris. In 1272 Aquinas returned to Naples, where he founded a Studium Generale, also know as a medieval university. Thomas Aquinas died roughly at the age of 49 in 1274. He is believed to have died in a monastery in Fossanova, near Sonnino. The Catholic Church canonized him and he was declared a saint by Pope John XXII and given the title of “Doctor of Angelicas.” Over his life Aquinas wrote many different works. Most of his works represent different questions and arguments more than likely presented as lectures to some of his students. The Summa contra Gentiles, also known as the Summa contra Gentes and the Summa Theologica are some of his best work. Both are believed to written towards the end of his life. The Summa contra Gentiles intended purpose was to be a missionary journal or handbook while the Summa Theologica was to help people understand the Christian faith to students. In this book Aquinas’s desire is to get rid of useless arguments and really address the most important issues. One of the things that you will find in the Summa contra Gentiles is that it is very apologetic in nature, basically for the purpose of defending the Christian truth in hostile situations. It is believed by some that it was intended for missionary journeys to help in defending the faith. The writings of Aquinas were extremely popular from the time they were first composed. Manuscripts of his work were copied and circulated way before the invention of the printing press. Aquinas, like many other theologians or philosophers today had a desire to be understood, but his concepts were not always easy to wrap your arms around. There were and still are many critics that try to understand and explain his theology; one estimate cites some 6000 commentaries on his works. The Catholic Church has praised Aquinas for his body of work and specifically the different doctrines and forming them into one whole. Pope John Paul II declared that one of Aquinas's greatest qualities was that "he had a great respect for the visible world because it is the work”. The question now is are there specifics about his life and teachings that are good or has his writing created more problems than benefits. In the following chapters we will examine some specifics of his writings. Thomas Aquinas, is viewed by the Catholic Church as a Saint, but the question is do all Christians hold the same view. I believe that Thomas Aquinas provides both benefit and burden to our cause. There are a number of things about Thomas Aquinas to recognize. The first thing I have noticed is that he was viewed by leaders of his time and even now as someone who has paved the way for others to follow especially in the area of Apologetics. Aquinas was really before his time when it came to defending the faith. Because of his contributions generations past and present now have a roadmap to seeing God’s word (the Bible) clearly communicated and defended. Secondly, Aquinas had a desire to form a way of thinking that was for everyone to embrace and understand. Even though there were many that applauded him he also was like any other thinker or philosopher in the fact that he had a list of critics who disagree with some of the specifics of his system of thinking. He had many critics, which included Philosophers such as Immanuel Kant and Karl Barth. While Barth agreed with him on many things he did disagree with him on the Proof of Necessary Being. While some may disagree with features of his system, very few before him had developed a defense as complete as his. Aquinas was truly a pioneer in this and because of his work it has opened the door for others to take a stand and defend what they believe too. Thirdly, Aquinas addressed the different challenges of intellect and reason within the church of his day and time. As we all know that no matter what denomination you are a part of there will always be differences. In our world today we disagree over church government, gifts of the Spirit and what color the carpet should be. The early church had their issues too and Aquinas was able to address things like pietism and fideism. Many of Thomas’s attempts to prove God’s existence have led others to expand their way of thinking. I would suggest that he is best known for his five ways of proving the existence of God, which is found in his most famous work Summa Theologica. The first argument was The Proof of motion. Things are put into motion by something else. In other words there must not be an initial unmoved mover, which would be God. The second argument was The Proof of efficient Cause. What this means is that all things have an instant or immediate cause. The immediate cause cannot go back infinitely, so the only explanation is an uncaused cause. Thirdly, there is The Proof of necessary being. He says that it is not necessary for any particular thing to exist. Aquinas believed that anything that was possible did not exist without they’re being an essence for them to exist. He believed that God was the unmoved mover and the one who made these exist. Fourth, there was Degrees of perfection. Thomas thought that things in our world had degrees of perfection. To him these different degrees gave the implication that there was a maximum degree of perfection. The max perfection could only be God. The fifth and final one was The evidence of order. The things that we have in this world have order to them; to Thomas even unintelligent things fell under this proof. He believed that all things had to have someone or something intelligent direct it. Aquinas believed this was God. He did not believe that things just happen by chance. I believe that Thomas Aquinas had a great influence on our culture as it is today. As stated before I believe that Thomas Aquinas was a true pioneer in the fact that he would challenge the different ideas of his time. While there is plenty that I would not agree with him on I can certainly appreciate what he had done for the movement of the Gospel. I believe people like Thomas Aquinas are still need today and trust and hope that the longer we wait upon the Lord that we would respond to our convictions just as Mr. Aquinas did. One thing is for certain and that is that this was a man that stood firm on his personal convictions. He was not willing to budge from them, and that is admirable. Thomas Aquinas believed in natural theology which means that God’s revelation will come through the means of creation. This reminds me of what we find in Romans 1: 20, For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes, His eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly seen, being understood through what has been made, so that they are without excuse. The Apostle Paul mentions here that there are invisible qualities of God’s power that have been seen by all mankind. It seems to me that Aquinas had a grasp of that you can see that in his work. I would also thank him for his actions in defending his convictions. You can also see this played out in Psalm 19 which says, “The heavens declare the glory of God; the skies proclaim the work of his hands. 2 Day after day they pour forth speech; night after night they reveal knowledge.” Its interesting from these few verses we can see that our God is awesome, creative and wise. He has the ability to do all things from the beginning to the end. These verses speak to this glory being shown in all aspects of who He is. One of the issues we have in our world today is that we make excuses for why we don’t believe in the existence of God. This I believe is what Thomas Aquinas was talking about. Even today we hear people say that they don’t believe that God existed. There has always been people that will refute the existence of God going all the way back to the beginning. One example of this occurred a number of years ago when some Soviet astronauts came back from spending a short time in space. When Yuri Gagarin stepped off the shuttle he told reporters that he did not see God so he must not exist. His view of this is pretty normal to lots of people. You hear people say all the time that there is no God or even recently we have heard some say that God is dead. What we find in these Scriptures is something completely different. Something that I believe had a great influence on Thomas Aquinas and his five proofs. Another thing that often arises when we discuss the existence of God is the amount of questions that people have. We live in a day and age where there is no absolute truth. People everywhere will keep asking question in the hopes that they can find an answer that we will not have an answer for because most of them don’t want to hear what we have to say. Along with their questions are the accusations of errors found in Scripture. The issue with this is its premise, but in most cases the opposite is true. Over the last number of years the Bible has been proven to be true and the Bible is still a number one best seller. I am grateful for the work of people like Thomas Aquinas. Philosophers like him have challenged our thoughts for years. The advantage we have today is the accessibility of the written word of God. I do believe that Thomas was right for the most part but my hope is that in the future because of all the work done since then we can use his work as a road map to defend the existence of God to anyone who would hear us. In the end the message of Christ is all that matters. In my experience I have found that there are plenty of people who will embrace God the creator but struggle with embracing God for their savior. Thomas Aquinas life is a reminder God is the author of life and the creator of the universe and he is the one who puts things in motion and nothing else.

Work Cited
"Bible Gateway Passage: Psalm 19 - New International Version." Bible Gateway. Web. 15 Dec.
"Bible Gateway Passage: Romans 1:20 - New International Version." Bible Gateway. Web. 16 Dec. 2014. .
2014. .
Dictionary.com. Dictionary.com. Web. 15 Dec. 2014.

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Thomas Aquinas

...BACKGROUND St. Thomas Aquinas was philosopher and theologian. Hewas born circa 1225 in Roccasecca, Italy. He is the son of Landulph, count of Aquino and his mother, Theodora, countess of Teano. Thomas had eight siblings, and was the youngest child. Though Thomas's family members were descendants of Emperors Frederick I and Henry VI, they were considered to be of lower nobility. Combining the theological principles of faith with the philosophical principles of reason, he ranked among the most influential thinkers of medieval Scholasticism. An authority of the Roman Catholic Church and a prolific writer. In January 1274, St. Thomas Aquinas embarked on a trip to Lyon, France, on foot to serve on the Second Council, but never made it there. Along the way, he fell ill at the Cistercian monastery of Fossanova, Italy. The monks wanted St. Thomas Aquinas to stay at the castle, but, sensing that his death was near, Thomas preferred to remain at the monastery, saying, "If the Lord wishes to take me away, it is better that I be found in a religious house than in the dwelling of a layperson." On his deathbed, St. Thomas Aquinas uttered his last words to the Cistercian monks who had so graciously attended him: "This is my rest forever and ever: Here will I dwell for I have chosen it." (Psalm 131:14) Often called "The Universal Teacher," St. Thomas Aquinas died at the monastery of Fossanova on March 7, 1274. He canonized by Pope John XXII in 1323. Source: http://www.biography.com/people/st-thomas-aquinas-9187231#early-life& ...

Words: 1314 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Thomas Aquinas

...THOMAS AQUINAS Introduction Saint Thomas Aquinas is one of the most famous saints of the Catholic Church. He is called a 'Doctor of the Church' and was a theologian, and philosopher. His parents sent him to a monastery when he was five years old and his teachers were surprised by how quickly he learned and his great faith. But when Thomas announced that he wanted to become a Dominican, his family tried to stop him. His brothers captured him and locked him up in a castle. His mother, sister and brothers kept him there for two years. Thomas was a very big man with a kind and humble manner. Because he didn't talk very much, people thought he was stupid and therefore called him 'the ox.' When they heard him preach, however, everyone realized how wise Thomas really was. After he became a priest, Thomas studied in Paris and taught at universities in many cities of Europe. He wrote more than 40 books and several beautiful hymns. All of his work praises God and helped many people understand faith better. At the end of his life, Saint Thomas stopped writing and he had a vision of Heaven. Because of this experience, Thomas decided that compared to the great glory of God, his writing was 'like straw.' Three months later, on his way to see the Pope, he died. Thomas Aquinas’ Early Life and Eduacation He was born in Italy in 1225, the son of a count. When he was five years old, his parents send him to study with the Benedictines of Monte Casino. There, and later at the university...

Words: 2468 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

St. Thomas Aquinas

...St.  Thomas  Aquinas  (c.  1225-­‐1274)   Biographical  Note     St.  Thomas  Aquinas  was  born  in  1225  at  the  castle  of  Roccasecca  in  the  Neapolitan   territory.  It  is  believed  that  the  castle  belonged  to  Aquinas’  father.  Thomas  Aquinas’  father   was  Count  Landulf  of  an  Italian  family,  however,  his  father  did  not  come  from  the  high   power  branch  of  the  family  but  simply  held  the  title.  Aquinas’  mother  was  Countess   Theodora  of  Theate,  comes  from  the  Rossi  branch  of  the  Neapolitan  Caracciolo  family,   which  is  a  noble  Norman  descent.     Aquinas  began  his  early  education  at  age  of  five  in  the  monastery  of  Monte  Cassino.  Later,   Aquinas  spent  some  time  studying  in  Naples.  Around  1243,  Aquinas  decided  to  join  the   Dominican  order;  however,  his  brothers  brought  him  back  to  his  parents  on  his  way  to   Rome  because  his  family  is  opposed  to  the  Dominican  order.  Aquinas  was  held  in  the  castle   of  S.  Giovanni...

Words: 1919 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

How Does Thomas Aquinas Prove The Existence Of God?

...Thomas Aquinas believed in God and wanted to prove God's existence to anyone who would not accept his faith alone. We can prove God's existence in different ways, but we cannot prove it by examining the concept of God. Aquinas proves the existence of God in five ways. In “ Summa Theologiae” written by Thomas Aquinas, in his third article he accepts that something necessarily exists which is god. The third way is found to be the most complex out of the five ways. Aquinas states that everything can fit into a “need-not-exist” category, so if everything belongs or fits into this category then is it true, that at one time nothing did exist? Or on the other hand, would have it been impossible for anything to exist, and even now would nothing exist....

Words: 643 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

The Existence of God: Theories of Thomas Aquinas and St. Anselm

...Philosophy 3 December 2013 The Existence of God: Theories of Thomas Aquinas and St. Anselm Everyone has a fundamental idea of God that they have thought of believing it or not believing it. Throughout history many theologians have tried to conjure up ideas and theories to prove the existence of God. In this essay I will explain two different philosophers ontological approach to proving the existence of God, and how their theories relate and compare to one another. The first philosopher St. Thomas Aquinas explains the existence of God in five different proofs. The first argument he attempts to prove the existence of God through, is the "unmoved mover" argument. He claims that since there is motion in the world, and motion has to be caused by another thing, which has to be caused by another thing, leads to the original mover, God who caused the first motion. The argument can be broken down like this: 1. Nothing can move itself. 2. If every object in motion had a mover, then the first object in motion needed a mover. 3. Movement cannot go on for infinity. 4. This first mover is the Unmoved Mover, called God. Aquinas motion includes any kind of change or growth. Aquinas argues that things that are at rest is the natural condition for them. Something that is moving is unnatural and must have been put into that state of motion by some external force.(Higgins) In the second argument for the existence of God, Aquinas bases it on the theory of Causation. He claims that since...

Words: 1493 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Kant and Aquinas

...Thomas Aquinas was an Italian priest who were the pioneers of theological teachings and famous for his Eucharistic hymns in church. Aquinas is a distinguished saint honored by the Catholic Church for his contributions in natural reasoning and several teachings of theology. The papal that undergo training go through his teachings and the pope of the Catholic Church has ordained him as the doctor of the church and the greatest philosopher and theologician of all times. Aquinas was considered a philosopher by his mates but he strongly objected and criticized other philosophers who pagans that the missed the massive wisdom available in the Christian revelations. Immanuel Kant was a German philosopher who formulated the theory of ethical deontology (Fagothey) Kant was a strong proponent of enlightenment rationalism which basically meant that for something to be good , it must be from a good will so and that the action just follows the will and the moral law. He also perpetrated the principle of universibility and strongly believed that for an action to be permissible by the society, must equally apply to all the people in the same manner and not biased. He also believed in the theories of perfect and imperfect duty and advocated that the perfect duty should an obvious thing in the eyes of the humanity such as committing murder is a criminal to both the mind and the soul and can be referred as a perfect duty. Imperfect duty such charitable works can be substantiated and simply bases...

Words: 686 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Scholastic Method

...Thomas Aquinas and His Use of the Scholastic Method Hayden Robinson World Civilizations The Scholastic Method is a way of proving a theory proposed by another scholar in a series of comparison, argument, and compromise. One well known user of this method was the scholar Thomas Aquinas. In Thomas’ book Summa Theologica, he proves that the existence of God is self-evident using this. Thomas offered The primary question that will be made an example of will be Question 2: The Existence of God. Seeing the Scholastic Method in these three articles will be an easy feat. With reading what he writes about and paying close attention to how he writes it, one can see strong elements of Scholasticism in his method of proving that God exists. Article One states the objections of the existence of knowledge, that God is “known”, as well as the existence of truth. Thomas gives these objections as examples proving that God’s existence is self-evident. He also states possible counter-examples so he may effectively counter the counter-examples with his “I answer that”. This statement of counter-examples show Scholasticism by making an agreement between two sides of the argument. Which is why he uses counter-examples as the “other side” of the argument that God’s existence is self-evident. Another form of the Scholastic Method is other books and or philosophers. Like one quote, Aquinas uses the verse Hebrews 11:1 which says “faith is the substance of things hoped for, the evidence of things...

Words: 680 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Aquinas' and Dante's Common Ideals

...Aquinas’ and Dante’s Common Ideals While St. Thomas Aquinas established himself as the New Aristotle of the 13th century, Dante Alighieri established himself the new Virgil. The two men made an immense impact in their respective fields (poetry and philosophy). Yet surprisingly, the two share common ideals. In each of their respective literary and philosophical views, they establish the importance of the relationship between nature and grace. In Dante’s Inferno the unique relationship of grace and nature is made apparent and reflects the writings of Aquinas’ “Summa Theologica”. Dante’s pilgrimage through Hell, Purgatory and Paradise exhibit and reflect St. Thomas’ understanding of the relationship of nature and grace. Dante mirrors grace through Beatrice and reflects nature in Virgil. These symbolic representations show how Aquinas views are instilled in Dante’s writing. In St. Thomas Aquinas’ “Summa Theologica” he bases the relationship between nature and grace on the human purpose. Since we are all rational beings with an ultimate goal of reuniting with God, Aquinas’ believes that both grace and nature will allow us to achieve the human goal. Aquinas explains that reason and revelation parallel moral development of virtue and grace. Reason is something you can practice, much like the four cardinal virtues temperance, courage, justice, and wisdom. These three theological virtues faith, hope and love help you achieve grace. These virtues come from...

Words: 1160 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Buddha and Aquinas

...Buddha and St. Thomas Aquinas Western philosophy and Eastern philosophy differ in many different ways. Western philosophy was mostly based on logic whereas Eastern philosophy was more spiritual and often focused on achieving serenity within one’s self. Though they had very different foundations, there are some similarities that occur within individual philosophers. Buddha is one of the most famous philosophers of all time and greatly influenced all of Eastern philosophy. Saint Thomas Aquinas was one of few philosophers that believed in God and the more logical aspects of Western philosophies. Those these two philosophers seem very different upon initial inspection, similarities arise when you delve further into their beliefs. Buddha and Aquinas had some similar beliefs on actions. Thomas Aquinas believed that the intention behind a person’s action determines whether or not that action is morally good or bad. Buddha believed the same that the intention of an action determines whether or not that action is good or bad. Buddha’s belief is backed up by his eightfold path under the “Right Action” rule. Also, though they both held widely different beliefs on the afterlife and what happened once one died, they did seem to have similar thoughts on how people should behave in order to achieve the best possible afterlife possibility. Saint Thomas Aquinas believed that there was a natural law that guides us to our natural goal-happiness on earth. He thought that human law-laws created...

Words: 795 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Philosophy and Religion

...Albert Rosales Professor: Gill Intro Philosophy: 213 In writing this paper, I was apprehensive by the immensity of the task that was required of me, having never studied Philosophy and philosophers before this class and not having a good understanding of it. I could not begin to comprehend Metaphysics, Ethics Epistemology etc. if it was not for this course. This may sound ignorant but I had never really given any thought to my worldview. If asked what I believed about something I would give my belief and that was that. What exactly is a worldview? A worldview is what it sounds like. It is the way one may see the world or as Nash puts it in his book Life’s Ultimate Questions “the sum total of a person’s answers to the most important questions in life(392).” Everyone has a worldview whether we realize it or not. How does one get their worldview? Our education, our upbringing, the culture we live in, the books we read, the media and movies we watch, all can help shape our worldview. Nash says, “Worldviews contain at least five clusters of beliefs, namely, beliefs about God, metaphysics (ultimate reality), epistemology (knowledge), ethics and human nature (14).” Using these five sections I will share my worldview. In general my worldview is a Christian one. I believe that there is one God who exists in three forms who created the Heavens and the earth. In the Bible Genesis 1:1 tells of how God is the beginning of everything; he created the heavens and the earth out of nothing...

Words: 2495 - Pages: 10

Free Essay

The Attainability of Happiness

...The Attainability of Happiness Can one attain happiness in this life? St. Thomas Aquinas is very opinionated on this subject. To know if one can attain happiness in this life, Aquinas first analyzes different possible sources of happiness to determine whether or not man’s happiness consists in these sources. Aquinas asks if any created good could consist of man’s happiness. St. Thomas says it could seem as if happiness consists of created goods because “man is made happy by that which lulls his natural desire”(1). Created goods satisfy us because they are what we crave, so when we attain them we could achieve happiness. Aquinas argues that while this is so, created goods cannot possibly be the source of man’s happiness. This is mainly due to the fact that created goods are “less than the goods of which he is capable, as of an object, and which is infinite. And the participated good which is in an angel, and in the whole universe, is a finite and restricted good” (2). What this means is that it does not make sense for man to solely derive his happiness from created goods because they are finite; there is only a set amount of these things in existence. Man would always have to worry about whatever good that is fueling his happiness from running out, because it is not eternal. For Aquinas, this means that our happiness cannot possibly consist of created goods because by definition, happiness is that state in which nothing is left to be desired. One is completely satisfied and at...

Words: 2070 - Pages: 9

Free Essay

History Paper

...Introduction Meister Eckhart (1260 - 1328) has been known as the father of German mysticism and the greatest of all mystics. Several authors reference him with the honour "the man from whom God hid nothing." He is known as a philosopher and a theologian but it was as a mystic that Meister Eckhart excelled. In his day Meister Eckhart enjoyed success as a popular preacher and churchman of high rank in his order, the Dominicans. However, Meister Eckhart was the only theologian of the medieval period to be formally charged with heresy. The shock of his trial for heresy and the condemnation of some of his work by Pope John XXII in Argo Dominco has cast a shadow over his reputation and a lingering suspicion over his orthodoxy that has lasted to this day. This research paper will focus on the intellectual and social history of Meister Eckhart. The development in thought of any theologian emerges from the life world of the theologian. [4] The life world is formed by the meeting of the cultural, social, and religious history of the day. Theologians are continually searching for new and meaningful ways to interpret religious experience. Meister Eckhart interpreted the religious experience of his day in a way that no others at the time did. I will explore in this paper some of the intellectual forces at work at the time and how he interpreted and connected with these. Secondly, it is important to understand the social history of the time. No theologians' thought is ever formed by simply...

Words: 8164 - Pages: 33

Premium Essay

Explain the Theory of Natural Law

...Natural Law exists to assist humans to direct their actions in such a way that they may reach their eternal density with God. There is a Natural Law for the physical world and the moral world that is discoverable through observation. The theory of Natural Law was created by Thomas Aquinas, who built his theory on key ideas from Ancient Greeks, in particular The Stoics and Aristotle. Amongst the Stoics teachings was the fact that the universe had a rational and purposeful order; to live in accordance with the universes order one had to follow Natural Law. This meant when making laws, they should be made and developed so that they correspond to nature of the universe. Aquinas taught, on ideas based on Aristotle that good person is someone who fulfils their purpose, meaning acting in accordance to Natural law. Aquinas believed that God had put inclinations in each human to behave in certain was; following our inclinations will lead us to the highest good and fulfil our purpose. The most basic and fundamental inclination that a person has is to do good and avoid evil. This brings about the question of: what actually is good and bad? There are real gods and apparent goods in the world. It was believed by Aquinas that human nature was essentially good, as natural law is absolute and is within everyone. He maintained that humans were oriented towards the achievement of perfection and that they could never knowingly peruse evil. Human actions that are not in pursuit of perfection can...

Words: 940 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Explain the Main Principles of the Natural Law Approach to Ethics.

...and deontological because it has primary precepts which are to do with duty, and secondary which apply to circumstances. Thomas Aquinas based Natural Law on Aristotle’s teaching about causality. In Aristotle Final cause and purpose are important when trying to give an explanation of a thing. Eg. the final cause of a knife is to cut. Aristotle thought this is what made a good knife. Something is good inasmuch as it fulfills its purpose. (The most important cause is the final cause which when achieved by an object it reaches perfection – because it has moved from potentiality to actuality eg. a potential A grade student becomes an actual one through application of hard work. ) The contrast with other senses of the word good can be brought out if we consider that a good knife can be used to perform a bad deed – ie. to stab a person. However, if it cut cleanly it would be good in the sense of doing what it was made for. This use of the word good is taken up in Aquinas and used in his theory. What is clear for a knife is not so clear for humans – what is our purpose? Ultimately, God Himself is the final purpose of human beings – our goals are not merely temporal, but eternal, because we have an immortal soul. However, we also have temporal purposes, which could be summarised as to live and flourish in certain ways discoverable by reason. Thomas Aquinas believed that Natural Law was part of a hierarchy of laws that are part of the cosmos created by God. God created everything...

Words: 656 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

A Shorter of Summa

...“A shorter of Summa”, the idea of happiness is well developed but at the theological and philosophical scale. In this book, the world has had as many theories of happiness as there are people that inhabit it with such varying opinions of what it takes to make humans the happiest. In this book the philosopher Saint Thomas Aquinas explained his view of theological perspective as compared to philosophical perspective. He compares wealth, honors, fame, power and pleasure that lead happiness. Talking about wealth, Saint Thomas says on (Kreeft 132-133): “It is impossible for man’s happiness to consist in wealth”, this assertion means that natural wealth should serve to replace the natural wants. According to “The Shorter Summa”, all things are below man and have been made for him. Another fact is about honor that is not a way to achieve happiness either according to Aquinas. Because by achieving honor for the sake of being honored is not noble, as I said in the discussion sheet in class. Aquinas said about this assertion that honor is external whereas happiness is internal and also states that honor can come from happiness but not the reverse. Another example that Aquinas uses to explain what happiness is not is the praise of being well-known. Because when someone want to praise his own personality the reason of doing so is happiness and want all other people be aware of his personality. This is probably the easiest to get a mental grasp of, especially in today’s society where famous...

Words: 268 - Pages: 2