Free Essay

Thomas Hobbes

In:

Submitted By dudeman12
Words 1580
Pages 7
“Computers are magnificent tools for the realization of our dreams, but no machine can replace the human spark of spirit, compassion, love, and understanding.”

Louis V. Gerstner, Jr.
Materialist Thomas Hobbes once stated that “human beings are in effect just complicated machines”, I disagree with that because unlike machines, humans are having a lot of factors to them that make them unpredictable whereas even the most complicated ones have predictable behaviors,. While humans behave as per their consciousness, machines just perform as they are taught and the most obvious reason is human emotion. This essay will be further expanding on ideas which will be contradicting Thomas Hobbes theory of human machines.

“Your intellect may be confused, but your emotions will never lie to you.”
Roger Ebert The main thing that makes humans, unlike machines is our emotions, unlike machines emotions are the very core of our being even though our brain makes chemicals that allow us to feel emotions, but that does not define what emotions are. Emotions are what make us weak and also make us strong. A mother’s love for their child can make her cry when they have to live apart for a prolonged period. Again, even the weakest of the weak might rise to the occasion and give a valiant fight with the strongest mass to save his beloved from any form of harm. A machine no matter how complicated cannot use emotions the way a human does, if it to be to keep a memory or even shape their being therefore it is invalid to say humans are complicated machines.

“While physics and mathematics may tell us how the universe began, they are not much use in predicting human behavior because there are far too many equations to solve. I'm no better than anyone else at understanding what makes people tick, particularly women.”

-Stephen Hawking
The one thing that every machine has in common no matter how simple or brain numbingly complicated it will always be one thing: predictable. No matter how well built a machine is it will always be predictable, that is another thing that makes humans, unlike machines because is history has proven anything is that humans are anything but predictable. For an example an inventor will know exactly how his creation will react to certain things like viruses or someone spilling water on it, but a psychiatrist will have worked with a patient for many years and will still not know how a patient will react to certain stimuli. A human, unlike a machine human can choose the way they want to act, whereas a machine will only act the way their creator wants it to. Another example would be a child and an iPhone, a parent may try to raise their child to be a morally upstanding citizen, but ten years down the road the child may take a turn for the unpleasant completely blindsiding the parent and in the case of the iPhone Steve jobs created to do certain things and they will always do those things and will never do something that was not in Steve jobs blueprint.

“One machine can do the work of fifty ordinary men. No machine can do the work of one extraordinary man.”

Elbert Hubbard
The biggest thing that stands in the way of Thomas Hobbes theory of being correct is our very being. Machines are things that can be defined by science and for the most part humans can somewhat be defined by science, but the one thing science cannot explain about humans is our souls, our soul cannot be defined by science, it is something that makes us who we are, it shapes our passions, our ideas even the way we feel and the most important part our ingenuity. The quote above states that a machine can do the job of ordinary men, but never the work of an extraordinary one, a statement that is true because our ideas, our beliefs and our passions all come from our soul. It allows to create extraordinary things that no machine can ever hope to achieve because a human can achieve things with their own power, whereas a machine can only do things that they are taught.

In conclusion humans can in no way be called complicated machines because machines can be easily understood whereas humans cannot. Even though Thomas Hobbes theory had some fair points it only covered things from a materialistic view and but it didn’t factor in the unpredictability of humans nor our ability for ingenuity which is the reason why I disaggre with his theory .

Aaron Thompson
Hzut401

Abstract
This essay will discuss the Thomas Hobbes theory of humans being complicated machines, in the essay I will be discussing from a negative standpoint disagreeing with his theory. Mainly because there are too many factors about human existence that can hardly be called machine, “Computers are magnificent tools for the realization of our dreams, but no machine can replace the human spark of spirit, compassion, love, and understanding.”

Louis V. Gerstner, Jr.
Materialist Thomas Hobbes once stated that “human beings are in effect just complicated machines”, I disagree with that because unlike machines, humans are having a lot of factors to them that make them unpredictable whereas even the most complicated ones have predictable behaviors,. While humans behave as per their consciousness, machines just perform as they are taught and the most obvious reason is human emotion. This essay will be further expanding on ideas which will be contradicting Thomas Hobbes theory of human machines.

“Your intellect may be confused, but your emotions will never lie to you.”
Roger Ebert The main thing that makes humans, unlike machines is our emotions, unlike machines emotions are the very core of our being even though our brain makes chemicals that allow us to feel emotions, but that does not define what emotions are. Emotions are what make us weak and also make us strong. A mother’s love for their child can make her cry when they have to live apart for a prolonged period. Again, even the weakest of the weak might rise to the occasion and give a valiant fight with the strongest mass to save his beloved from any form of harm. A machine no matter how complicated cannot use emotions the way a human does, if it to be to keep a memory or even shape their being therefore it is invalid to say humans are complicated machines.

“While physics and mathematics may tell us how the universe began, they are not much use in predicting human behavior because there are far too many equations to solve. I'm no better than anyone else at understanding what makes people tick, particularly women.”

-Stephen Hawking
The one thing that every machine has in common no matter how simple or brain numbingly complicated it will always be one thing: predictable. No matter how well built a machine is it will always be predictable, that is another thing that makes humans, unlike machines because is history has proven anything is that humans are anything but predictable. For an example an inventor will know exactly how his creation will react to certain things like viruses or someone spilling water on it, but a psychiatrist will have worked with a patient for many years and will still not know how a patient will react to certain stimuli. A human, unlike a machine human can choose the way they want to act, whereas a machine will only act the way their creator wants it to. Another example would be a child and an iPhone, a parent may try to raise their child to be a morally upstanding citizen, but ten years down the road the child may take a turn for the unpleasant completely blindsiding the parent and in the case of the iPhone Steve jobs created to do certain things and they will always do those things and will never do something that was not in Steve jobs blueprint.

“One machine can do the work of fifty ordinary men. No machine can do the work of one extraordinary man.”

Elbert Hubbard
The biggest thing that stands in the way of Thomas Hobbes theory of being correct is our very being. Machines are things that can be defined by science and for the most part humans can somewhat be defined by science, but the one thing science cannot explain about humans is our souls, our soul cannot be defined by science, it is something that makes us who we are, it shapes our passions, our ideas even the way we feel and the most important part our ingenuity. The quote above states that a machine can do the job of ordinary men, but never the work of an extraordinary one, a statement that is true because our ideas, our beliefs and our passions all come from our soul. It allows to create extraordinary things that no machine can ever hope to achieve because a human can achieve things with their own power, whereas a machine can only do things that they are taught.

In conclusion humans can in no way be called complicated machines because machines can be easily understood whereas humans cannot. Even though Thomas Hobbes theory had some fair points it only covered things from a materialistic view and but it didn’t factor in the unpredictability of humans nor our ability for ingenuity which is the reason why I disaggre with his theory .

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Thomas Hobbes

...Thomas Hobbes “I was born in fear and remained in fear my whole life.” Who is the best sort of person to lead us? Not important to Hobbes All People are competitive, full of fear, and full of pride. People are Selfish Invents concept for life without government  STATE OF NATURE is when there is no governmental body to rule over the people Hobbes believes it is not good, people would not be happy. Business would not exist The purpose of government is to put truth in words.  What is the basis of government? Social contract- agreement of citizens to abide by laws and rules government creates. Natural laws are terms of social contract: Seek Peace, give up something (right to make own decisions), agree to keep promises, establish a rule maker called the sovereign, give him the power of enforcement Hobbes believes that the need for government is to protect us from our other fellow citizens.  Rebelling against the government is a bad thing in Hobbes’ eyes because it puts society closer to State of Nature. John Locke What is the purpose of government? What would life be like in a state of nature? Human nature- everyone is selfish, everyone is born with rationality Locke believes that things wouldn’t change much in state of nature , business would exist.  We need government to solve basic economic problems,  Social Contract- people give up 3 inalienable rights: Life, liberty, right to Property Government must promise to improve the common weale or improve peoples lives and...

Words: 635 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Thomas Hobbes and Democracy

...Thomas Hobbes Thomas Hobbes was an English philosopher who was born April 5,1588 and died December 4,1679. He attended Oxford University where he studied classics. He was a tutor by profession and also traveled around Europe to meet scientists and to study different forms of government. Thomas Hobbes was the first great figure in modern moral philosophy. He became interested in why people allowed themselves to be ruled and what type of government would be best for England. Hobbes had a pessimistic view of people. His view was that humans were mean creatures who would do anything to better their positions. Also that people could not be trusted to make decisions on their own and a country needed an authority figure to provide direction and leadership. Therefore, he believed in monarchy- a government that gave all power to a king or queen. He said that democracy would never work because people were only interested in promoting their own self-interests. Despite this doubt of democracy, he believed that a contrasting group of representatives presenting the problems of the common person would prevent a king from being unfair and cruel. Hobbes originates the phrase 'Voice of the people' meaning one person could be chosen to represent a group with similar views. Legitimacy of government Hobbes was a dedicated materialist. The views that got him in trouble were related to this, as Hobbes claimed to believe in God...

Words: 1136 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

The Works of Thomas Hobbes

...The Works of Thomas Hobbes The moral and political philosophy of Thomas Hobbes is very different from those of the ancients, specifically Aristotle. As a thinker during the Scientific Revolution, his picture of morality is framed in science. And while science is usually thought of to have no opinion about questions of right and wrong, Hobbes would argue otherwise. He wanted to move moral and political philosophy into the realm of science, where answers can—and should— come from science and reason, and away from the monopoly over human values held by religious texts. Furthermore, he called for a powerful, civil authority to combat what he called “the state of nature (Leviathan).” It may seem normal to define morality and science as entirely separate from each other, that is, to say that science can help explain why we may value certain things, but it can never determine what we should value. However, Hobbes sees an overlap between facts and values and attempts to use empirical answers to help figure out philosophical problems. This idea of applying facts to issues of good and evil rests upon the notion that questions such as “What is truly worth living for?...Or even dying for?” “What is morality?” and “What is a ‘good’ life?” have answers. Hobbes would say that they do, and with good reason. Questions like “What food is healthy?” or “What exercises are best?” are much like moral questions because it is difficult to find an exact answer due to the many different, correct...

Words: 1343 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Thomas Hobbes Outline

...were they? (Type here→) Thomas Hobbes was an English philosopher, and was very involved in his politics. Where were they from? (Type here→) He was from London, England When did they live? (Type here→) He was born April 5th, 1588 and died on December 4th, 1679. Thesis statement: Tie in the name of your historical figure plus the SPEC words (social, political, economic, & cultural). (Type here→) Thomas Hobbes was an English philosopher that affected England politically, socially, economically, and culturally. Topic sentence (social) (Type here→) He had moral ideas that were based off of natural authority that rules us. Claim #1 (Type here→) Citizens do not have the...

Words: 1021 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Thomas Hobbes Research Paper

...According to Thomas Hobbes in his book Leviathan, “The question who is the better man, has no place in the condition of meer Nature;…”(Hobbes XV.211). Hobbes established in his book that all men are equal in Nature; this is the ninth law and very important part of his political philosophy. Hobbes also reveals that his philosophy is significantly different than the writings of Aristotle. He challenges Aristotle’s views of the inequality of men, the good, and evil that controls man’s life. Hobbes would find that day’s society would view his ideal of the “ultimate government” as being liberal and not a complete representation of the United States’ ruling system. First of all, Thomas Hobbes’ ninth law of nature states that all men are created...

Words: 284 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Thomas Hobbes Purpose Of Government

...The Purpose of Government What is the Purpose of Government? Ronald Reagan said “Government’s first duty is to protect the people, not run their lives.” This quote follows the fundamental principles of a Social Contract as described by Thomas Hobbes and John Locke. Though the two Enlightenment thinkers had some contradicting views they came to the same conclusion. Government is created by the people, for the people. Thomas Hobbes was the first person to explore the idea of a social contract between citizens and their government. Hobbes was an influential Enlightenment thinker who believed that people are naturally selfish and violent and that life without government is “nasty, brutish, and short.” He argued that people...

Words: 345 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Comparing Rousseau And Thomas Hobbes

...Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Thomas Hobbes were 17th and 18th century philosophers with contrasting theories about human nature. Rousseau published first part of his Discourse on Inequality arguing that men in a state of nature are free and equal. In their theories, both Hobbes and Rousseau’s appeal to the state of nature are quite different. This paper will discuss how Rousseau’s understanding of fear of death of human nature differs from Hobbes’s understanding. Hobbes believes that man is always in the fear of being killed in a painful way because everyone is an enemy of each other. Hobbes says life is “solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short” (Hobbes, 76). The fear of a short life that ends badly should be the glue that holds society together....

Words: 1009 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Thomas Hobbes And John Locke Comparison

...Comparing Thomas Hobbes and John Locke’s views concerning what life is like in a state of nature, we can see that the two-theorist’s share opposite views in making an assumption of what the state of nature is like. Thomas Hobbes’ views include pessimistic views of nature and how its effects can influence man to selfishly consider what he would need to do to secure his safety while John Locke presents a natural concept that assumes there is a universal thought of good that man is aware of. Attempting to justify the role of government or justice by understanding the state of nature can be somewhat accurate and can be considered for such purposes, but may fail to answer some aspects of society overall and leave other things unanswered. In regards...

Words: 3320 - Pages: 14

Premium Essay

Was Thomas Hobbes Responsible For A Dictatorship

...Thomas Hobbes believed that humans were naturally driven by fear, greed, violence, and self-interest. Humans were led by extreme individualism. This was dangerous as it led to the inability to co-exist peacefully. Hobbes argued that it was dangerous to allow society to be free and that in order to be secure, society had to relinquish their individual liberties. As a result, he suggested a government in which society would give up their freedoms to an individual who would then be responsible for its security. In essence, Hobbes wished for a dictatorship. John Locke believed that individuals were rational, intelligent, and reasonable. If given the ability to think for themselves, they would be able to distinguish right from wrong. As a society,...

Words: 310 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Faulty And Untrue In Thomas Hobbes Leviathan

...In Hobbes’s Leviathan, he examines man’s relationship with one another in a state of war. Hobbes claims that naturally humans are in a state of “kill or be killed”, pushed to hurt each other by their need for self preservation. But this idea that men are controlled by their fears in a state of nature provides a cynical and faulty view of man. Hobbes fails to take man’s capacity to love into account in his philosophy. Because of this, Hobbes’s belief about man’s state of nature is faulty and untrue. When Hobbes examines man’s behavior, he claims that man is controlled by a need for power. Hobbes argues that each action committed by a man is his attempt to become more powerful. He claims that all of man’s desires “may be be be reduced to the...

Words: 555 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Thomas Hobbes Single Largest Fear

...Hobbes looked at society not as a unit but as many individuals, he goes on to say that the single largest fear is that of a violent death which would come about from another individual. In order to avoid this, individuals will try to further their self-preservation through three methods: diffidence, competition and glory. Whereby diffidence leads to man avoiding man, the prime source of a violent death. Competition over essential resources in order to preserve ones body and glory where one will show off their strength and intellect in order to try and scare off other individuals. Hobbes says these methods rather than avoid violence, actually lead to increased violence and the individuals in such a society are trapped in a worsening spiral of...

Words: 369 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Thomas Hobbes: Commonwealth And Sovereignties In The United States

...In Chapters sixteen through twenty-four, Hobbes mainly talks about two main subjects, the commonwealth and sovereignties. Hobbes defines both for us, and explains their rules and conditions. Something I found interesting was in chapter eighteen, where Hobbes is explaining the right of sovereigns. On page 115, he quotes, “a kingdom divided in itself cannot stand,” a reference he is making, that is actually found in the Bible. Since Hobbes wrote this before the United States of America was founded, it is fair to say that this idea was onset by either Hobbes or the Bible, in our current country ideals. This concept is even recited in the United States pledge, “…and to the Republic, for which it stands, one nation, under God, INDIVISABLE, with...

Words: 285 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Thomas Hobbes

...HOBBES Thomas Hobbes argues that the “State of Nature” is the condition where we are forced into contact with each other in the absence of a superior authority. Where we would imagine that people might fare best in such a state, also where each decides for themselves on how to act, and judge. Unfortunately, people cannot be trusted always to follow their will. Hobbes describes this situation as “the condition of mere nature” a state of perfectly private judgment upon any reasonable suspicion. Also, where there is no agency with recognized authority to resolve arguments and the power to implement its decisions. If this were the state, then life of a man would be nasty, disagreeable, violent, short, and solitary. If this is the State of Nature, then people have the strong reasons to avoid it. Hobbes felt that society naturally correspondent to a State of Nature, and that this State of Nature is a State of War, a war of “all against all”. In order to avoid living in a State of Nature, and therefore avoiding a State of War, which can only be done by submitting some mutually recognized public authority. Therefore a sovereign had to be erected; the sovereign would be given the rights of all their subjects and be able to enforce peace. Hobbes vision of an absolute sovereign is a sovereign with unlimited power, because if the power of sovereign were limited, then it would have to be limited by an even higher power. He also divided the power of the sovereign, and the rights that were...

Words: 826 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Thomas Hobbes

...LEVIATHAN, or The Matter, Form, & Power of a COMMON-WEALTH ECCLESIASTICAL AND CIVIL By THOMAS HOBBES London,1651 AMERICAN UNIVERSITY OF BEIRUT THE INTRODUCTION PART I 1 OF MAN Ch. I Of SENSE 2 Ch. 2 Of IMAGINATION 2 Ch. 5 Of REASON, and SCIENCE 3 Ch. 6 Of [...] the PASSIONS 7 Ch. 8 Of the VIRTUES Commonly Called INTELLECTUAL […] 9 Ch. 10 Of POWER, WORTH, DIGNITY, HONOUR and WORTHINESS 10 Ch. 11 Of the Difference of MANNERS 11 Ch. 13 Of the NATURAL CONDITION of MANKIND 13 Ch. 14 Of the First and Second NATURAL LAWS and of CONTRACTS 15 Ch. 15 Of Other Laws of Nature 18 Ch. 16 Of PERSONS, AUTHORS, and Things Personated 21 PART II OF COMMONWEALTH Ch. 17 Of the Causes, Generation, and Definition of a COMMONWEALTH 22 Ch. 18 Of the RIGHTS of Sovereigns by Institution 24 Ch. 20 Of Dominion PATERNAL and DESPOTICAL 27 Ch. 21 Of the LIBERTY of Subjects 30 Ch. 26 Of CIVIL LAWS 33 Ch. 30 Of the OFFICE of the Sovereign Representative 34 [ PART III OF A CHRISTIAN COMMONWEALTH [ PART IV OF THE KINGDOM 0F DARKNESS [ A REVIEW and CONCLUSION ] Chapters 32-43 ] Chapters 44-47 ] THE INTRODUCTION Nature (the art whereby God hath made and governs the world) is by the art of man, as in many other things, so in this also imitated, that it can make an artificial animal. For seeing life is but a motion of limbs, the beginning whereof is in some principal...

Words: 27668 - Pages: 111

Premium Essay

Did Jefferson Influence John Locke And Thomas Hobbes

...Thomas Jefferson was greatly influenced by John Locke and Thomas Hobbes while writing the Declaration of Independence. Their philosophies were that if the people gave the government power, the government would protect society from the chaos due to the disregard of laws. Slavery was occurring across the thirteen colonies during the time the Declaration was being drafted, but it was not addressed in the statement. The Declaration has three parts to it. The first part showed beliefs about government, the second part included a list of King George’s wrong doings to show how he had violated the people’s rights, and the last part was Congress’s actual statement of independence from Great Britain. Slavery was occurring across the thirteen colonies...

Words: 274 - Pages: 2