Free Essay

To What Extent Are the Two Chamber of Congress Equal in Power?

In:

Submitted By DanGolan123
Words 826
Pages 4
To what extent are the two chamber of congress equal in power?
The two chambers do have some concurrent powers. Concurrent powers are those that are held by both chambers of congress. The two houses are equal in the passage of legislation. All bills must pass through all stages in both houses; neither house can override the wishes of the other. Both must agree the same version of the bill before that bill can be sent to the president for his signature. Both houses must vote by a two-thirds majority to override a president’s veto of a bill. In 2007, congress overrode president bush’s veto of the Water Resources Development Bill. The vote in the House was 381-40 and the vote in the senate was 81-12. The two houses are also equal in power when it comes to initiating constitutional amendments, an amendment must be approved by a two thirds majority in both houses before it can be sent to the states for their ratification. Both houses must concur in a declaration of war. This has occurred on only 5 occasions, the last one being in 1941, when America declared war on Japan in the Second World War. Lastly the 25th amendment gave to both houses the power to confirm a newly appointed vice president, this has occurred in 1973 and in 1974. Furthermore when the republicans take control of the senate in January 2015, both houses will be controlled by the republicans, meaning the differences in houses will be less relevant, as agreement between both houses will be much easier. It is also worth mentioning that members of both houses receive the same salaries, in January 2012, it was $174,000. However due to the more influence Senators have they are more likely to receive sponsoring from interest groups.
With regards to the power of impeachment the senate has the power to try that case of impeachment. In December 2010, Judge Thomas Porteous was found guilty by the Senate on four counts, but the Senate acquitted President Clinton in 1999. Not only do the senate have a slightly higher influence in the concurrent powers but is generally seen as the more powerful house of the two due to their exclusive powers being more prestigious than that of the House. Two of them in particular give the senate more power than the house. Firth the senate along has the power to confirm by simple majority many appointments made by the president. These include all the president’s appointments to the judiciary and many of the appointment to the executive branch. In 2013 when secretary of state Hillary Clinton resigned, President Obama had to gain the approval of the senate to appoint John Kerry to replace her. The senate voted 94-3 to appoint him. This power is significant in giving the senate more power as it allows them to confirm the people who would be more beneficial to them, i.e. someone who agrees with the views of the party that controls the senate.
The second significant exclusive power of the senate is to ratify by a two thirds majority all treaties negotiated by the president. This means that the president needs to keep the Senate informed throughout treaty negotiations, to avoid concluding treaties that the senate is unlikely to ratify. In December 2010, the senate voted by 71 votes to 26 to ratify the New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty negotiated by president Obama. However this may not be a true indication of the Senates power with regards to treaties as the senate was at that time and still is until January controlled by the Democrats who hold similar if not the same views as Obama therefore it would not hard for him to gain their support. As of January Obama may find it harder to get his treaties ratified by the Senate.
Suggestions that the house is more prestigious than the Senate are substantiated by the fact that Congressmen seek to be Senators, in 2013 there were 50 former House members in the Senate but no ex- senators in the house. There are various reason why Senators are seen to be more powerful than Congressmen other than the exclusive powers of the house. Firstly whilst Congressmen only represent a congressional district, senators represent an entire state. For example Adam Schiff represents only the 28th congressional district of California, but Senator Dianne Feinstein represents the entire state of California. Senators also enjoy a 6-year term in the Senate whilst congressmen have only a 2 year term in the house. This means that House member can only really push forward populist policy rather than pursuing what they really want to achieve as they have the constant challenge of re-election. One other power that the Senate have that gives them slightly more power, is the ability to filibuster, which is the power to delay, this gives senators greater power in the legislative process.

Similar Documents

Free Essay

To What Extent Are the Two Chambers of Congress Equal in Power and Influence?

...Generally the Senate is viewed as the more influential and prestigious body. A primary reason for this is its greater exclusive powers. In particular, the Senate has the sole power to ratify treaties, with a 2/3 majority required. For example this power was used in 2010 to ratify the New Start Treaty, passing in a 71-26 majority. In essence, the Senates role in foreign policy is far more extensive. Another of the Senate’s exclusive powers is to ratify the president’s nominations and this manifests perhaps most importantly regarding the Supeme Court. Not only can they vote against a nomination e.g when Robert Bork, the conservative justice nomination by Reagan in 1987 was voted against by 58-42 but also the mere threat of a veto severely affects who the president will even consider putting forward. For example Obama could now theoretically put forward a very liberal Supreme Court justice however he knows it would eb a wasten of time given the Republican majority in the Senate. However it should be remembered that the House too has its own exclusive powers such as in itiating money bills and the power of impeachement. Moreover, in terms of individual factors the Senate clearly appears more presitigous and influential. Firstly, there are just 100 senators compared to 435 members of the House which automatically gives indivisuals a greater infleucne. Equally, Senate terms are 6 years compared to 2 in the House, so Senators can focus on their actual job and getting things done rather...

Words: 432 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Analysis

...Example 1: Altering the Constitution The formal amendment process, two formal methods of proposing an amendment to the Constitution are available: (1) a two thirds vote in each chamber of congress or (2) a national convention that is called by congress at the request of two-thirds of the state legislatures. The second method has never been used. Ratification can occur by one of two methods: (1) by a positive vote in three-fourths, of the legislatures of the various states or (2) by special conventions called in the states and a positive in three-fourths of them. The second method has been used only once, to repeal Prohibition (the ban on the production and sale of alcoholic beverages). That situation was exceptional prohibitionist forces were in control of the legislatures in many states where a majority of the population actually supported repeal. Nevertheless, congress has considered more than eleven thousand amendments to the Constitution. Only thirty-three amendments have been submitted to the states after having been approved by the required two-thirds vote in each chamber of congress, and only twenty-seven have been ratified. It should be clear that the amendment process is very difficult. Because of competing social and economic interests, the requirement that two-thirds of both the House and the Senate approved the amendments is hard to achieve. Likewise, I would alter the constitution by (1). Term Limits to members of the U.S. House and Senate (4 terms {2-year terms}...

Words: 1685 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Health Politics and Policy

...1. A. What is the role of congress in the policy making process? Congress is the designated lawmaking body of the federal government. Policies (laws) pass through congress via a long process. A member of congress will introduce a bill which is then referred to committee(s) in the Senate and House. The committee refines, approves, and sends the bill on to the Chamber of congress where it originated. The bill could also die in committee from lack of support. The House or Senate will vote on the bill and either approves it and sends it to the other chamber or it will die. The other chamber can approve, revise, or let the bill die. If both the House and Senate move a version of a bill forward, then a committee made up of both chambers come to agreement and send the bill back to the two chambers for a vote. The bill, if not approved, dies. If the chambers approve it, then it goes to the President to sign. If the President vetoes the bill, congress can override it if they have a two-thirds majority in both the House and in the Senate [ (Teitelbaum & Wilensky, 2007, pp. 13-18) ]. 1. B. What is the difference between mandatory and discretionary spending? “Mandatory spending programs are those where the federal government is obligated to provide funds for an expense” [ (Fay, 2008) ]. The allocation of this money is based on existing laws. Congress does not have to vote to approve spending the money each year, it will happen automatically. There are several examples of mandatory...

Words: 2324 - Pages: 10

Free Essay

Lbj and the Cra

...Allen PSCI 213 December 3, 2015 LBJ and the CRA The Civil Rights Act of 1964, which happened over 50 years ago, is not something my generation probably thinks of as a big deal. We all just assume that every man, woman, and child is endowed with equal rights and it is a crazy notion to suggest otherwise. However in the spring of 1964 not every man was considered equal, especially in the south. However, at the same time, a movement was building to codify equal rights spearheaded by Lyndon B. Johnson. Of course there were so many individuals and factors involved in the passage of the bill, however, in this paper I will focus mainly on LBJ and his contribution to the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Although the initial bill was brought before Congress during JFK’s presidency, his assassination led to Johnson successfully shepherding the bill to passage. Johnson’s success can be attributed to his headstrong endurance, long time relationships with members of Congress, and the policy window due to the death of President Kennedy that finally got the legislation passed. In order to fully examine and give context to Johnson’s struggle for passage of this important bill, this paper will also touch upon who LBJ was before his presidency and what the Civil Rights Act of 1964 did for him, his perception, and his presidency. Lyndon Baines Johnson really got his start in government when he entered the Senate in 1949. Johnson had been a Representative to Texas’ 10th district; his win was due...

Words: 3580 - Pages: 15

Free Essay

Politic History of France

...Second World War. The following aspects of political history of five selected countries - France, Germany, Great Britain, Italy and Spain- are covered : early kingdoms, unification, nationalism movements, political philosophies, conferences, alliance systems and conflicts which had an impact on Europe during the 17th, 18th, 19th and 20th Centuries.Topics such as the Enlightenment, the French Revolution, the Concert of Europe, and the two world wars will also be discussed. Special emphasis will be placed on the relationship between the rise of liberalism and nationalism, the industrial revolution, and the emergence of modern political systems in Europe. Contents Introduction Chapter 1 Political history of France : Chapter 2 Political history of Germany: Chapter 3 Political history of Great Britain: Chapter 4 Political history of Italy: Chapter 5 Political history of Spain: Introduction In studying political history of European states, we put a focus on the beginning of the 18th century as a starting point in the rise of major European powers in the face of waning non-Western empires, which led to the consequent politicization of the region as a whole, raising the stakes in the division and distribution of resources, areas of influence and geostrategic waterways. During the 18th century, Europe has seen the rise of despotic monarchies in some of the European...

Words: 24910 - Pages: 100

Premium Essay

Pols Final Exam Review

...complete the exam. Federalism: The Basic elements of a Federal system of government (i.e. how is it structured/how power is shared) • Layers of gov • Equal power • Distinct powers Powers of the federal government: delegated powers, implied powers (necessary and proper clause), and concurrent powers. • Delegated Powers: (expressed/enumerated powers) powers given to the federal government directly by the constitution. Some most important delegated powers are: the authority to tax, regulated interstate commerce, authority to declare war, and grants the president role of commander and chief of the military • Implied Powers: Powers not expressed in the constitution, but that can be inferred. “Necessary and proper clause” • Concurrent powers: powers shared by both levels of government. Ex: Taxes, roads, elections, commerce, establishing courts and a judicial system • Reserved powers: powers not assigned by the constitution to the national government but left to the states or the people. Guaranteed by the 10th amendment. Include “police power”-health and public welfare, intra-state commerce. Example of police powers: Gonzales vs Raich (2005) and California Medical Marijuana. The parts and relevance of the "Triad of Powers" • Interstate commerce clause • General welfare • 10th amendment – non-delegated powers go to the states Federalism between states (i.e. full faith and credit and privileges and immunities clause, original...

Words: 37488 - Pages: 150

Premium Essay

Iran Revolution

...The Modernization of Women in Revolutionary Iran The Quran, Sura 4, verse 38 states, “Men are the managers of the affairs of women for that God has preferred in bounty one of them over another…and those you fear may be rebellious admonish; banish them to their couches, and beat them”. To develop and understand social change, it is crucial to examine the central structures and organizations within a given society. Through examining family structure, the state, and religion, geared with a specific focus on gender, a basic set of followed societal governing rules and values become apparent. Each of these societal structures are interrelated, working together to permit as well as restrict the agency of women in revolutionary Iranian society. For the development of successful social change to take place, it must arise through gender conflict, class conflict, and political action. Each social structure such as, family structure, state relations, and religion, is located within the larger context of a national structure, meaning the examples previously mentioned are subject to larger regional and global influences and changes. Due to this reasoning, it is important to examine evolving economic development and political change to understand women’s status within Iranian revolutionary societies and furthermore, their changing roles within the traditional family structure, Islam, education, and the work force. Through an analysis of class location, policy restructuring, and changing...

Words: 3506 - Pages: 15

Premium Essay

His/301

...Course Description This course is an introduction to the historical, political, philosophical, and economic roots of the U.S. Constitution. It first reviews the philosophical arguments of the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists, those that supported and opposed ratification of the Constitution. The course then examines milestone Supreme Court decisions and the Court’s evolving interpretations of the Constitution. This course focuses on the first ten amendments of the Constitution, known as the Bill of Rights, and the issues of slavery and civil rights as seen through major court decisions. Policies Faculty and students/learners will be held responsible for understanding and adhering to all policies contained within the following two documents: • University policies: You must be logged into the student website to view this document. • Instructor policies: This document is posted in the Course Materials forum. University policies are subject to change. Be sure to read the policies at the beginning of each class. Policies may be slightly different depending on the modality in which you attend class. If you have recently changed...

Words: 2946 - Pages: 12

Premium Essay

Parliamentary

...Unibersidad De Manila 659-A Justice Cecilia Munoz-Palma Street, Ermita, Manila, Metro Manila Parliamentary: A Good Form of Government Aira C. Adao UC-48 Prof. Marvin Ignacio Politics and Governance January 20, 2015 I. Title: Parliamentary: A Good Form of Government II. Abstract HYPOTHESIS 1. What is Parliamentary Government? 2. What are the types of Parliamentary Government? 3. What are the advantages and disadvantages of Parliamentary System? 4. What countries are implementing Parliamentary System? 5. What is the difference between Parliamentary System and Presidential System? OBJECTIVES * To point out the good sides of the Parliamentary system. * To discuss the process of legislation of the Parliamentary Government. * To tackle the important topic about Parliamentary system. * To form a good information to the readers about the essence of Parliamentary system. SIGNIFICANCE * This term paper gives information to the reader about the system of Parliamentary Government. * This paper will benefit the ones who search information about the essence of Parliamentary system. III. Introduction Parliament, (from Old French: parlement; Latin: parliamentum) the original legislative assembly of England, Scotland, or Ireland and successively of Great Britain and the United Kingdom; legislatures in some countries that were once British colonies are also known as parliaments. The British Parliament, often referred...

Words: 5723 - Pages: 23

Free Essay

Foundation Outline (Prof. William Ewald)

...Wenzhen Dai Penn Law Summer 2006 I.  Introduction and Historical Background    A. What the course will cover?      This  is  not  an  introductory  course.    You  are  all  lawyers;  I  shall  assume  a  good  deal  of  professional  expertise,  and  that  many  of  you  already  have  a  body  of  knowledge  about  American  law.    The task: prepare you for the coming year, give you the basic grounding that you will need  for the courses you are going to start taking in September.  For this, you need two things:    ♥ A  great  deal  of  basic  factual  information  about  how  the  courts  and  the  legal  system  function, and about basic legal concepts (and legal vocabulary);     ♥ But  more  importantly:  background  information  about  some  of  the  critical  ways in which  the American legal system is unique, and differs from legal systems elsewhere in the  world.  This is hard: often you will find that your professors or fellow‐students will make  assumptions  or  presuppose  certain  ways  of  doing  things  that  aren’t  explained  in  class.    A  large goal of this course is to explain those assumptions, and make them explicit.       >> UNIQUENESS OF AMERICAN LEGAL SYSTEMS    Briefly, there are four aspects of the American legal system that set it apart:    1) Inherited  common  law,  existing  out  of  three  components:  (a)  judicial  power;  (b)  civil  jury  trial; (c) law‐equity ;  2) Written  Constitution  and  Bill  of  Rights; ...

Words: 43059 - Pages: 173

Free Essay

Gov and Pol

...Politics ExamBuster 2009 Introduction to Unit 1- People and Politics Understanding the Examination and Exam Technique Choosing your questions In this unit you are presented with four questions. They are of equal value and each question covers one of the four sections of the specification. These are: Democracy and political participation Party policies and ideas Elections Pressure groups There is no significance to the order in which questions appear. Each question is divided into three sections (a), (b) and (c). When choosing which questions to do, the following principles are recommended: It is almost certain that you will be better off choosing your strongest question to do first. You should choose questions on the basis of how well you can answer the section (c) part. The (c) part carries 25 of the 40 marks available for the whole answer. Do not choose a question simply because you can do part (a) especially well. The (a) question is only worth 5 marks. It would be illogical to choose your strongest (a) part if you cannot do well on section (c). If you cannot decide between several (c) parts, i.e. you can do more than one equally well, make your choice on the basis of part (b) which carries 10 marks. But remember, it is the (c) parts that will determine most what your overall mark will be. So, when you first look at the exam paper, look at the (c) sections first. Assessment Objectives Each question is divided into three sections, as follows: carries 5 marks carries...

Words: 51996 - Pages: 208

Free Essay

Politics

...POLITICS AS LEVEL UNIT TWO GOVERNING THE UK “Never, never, never give up” Winston S Churchill 1874-1965 1 GOVERNING THE UK 50% of AS [25% of A2] UNIT TWO SAMPLE QUESTION Answer one question from Section A and one question from Section B in 80 minutes. Spend 40 minutes on Section A and 40 minutes on Section B SECTION A QUESTION ONE PRIME MINISTERIAL POWER “For too long the big political decisions in this country have been made in the wrong place. They are not made around the Cabinet table where they should be, but they are taken on the sofa in Tony Blair’s office. No notes are kept and no one takes the blame when things go wrong. That arrogant style of government must come to an end. I will restore the proper process of government. I want to be Prime Minister of this country not a President (Source: David Cameron, The Times, 5th October 2006) “The Cabinet is the committee at the centre of the British political system. Every Thursday during Parliament, Secretaries of State from all departments as well as other ministers meet in the Cabinet Room in Downing Street to discuss the big issues of the day. The Prime Minister chairs the meeting, selects its members and also recommends their appointment as ministers to the monarch. The present Cabinet has 23 members (21 MPs and two peers). The secretary of the Cabinet is responsible for preparing records of its discussions and decisions”. (Source: From a modern textbook) (a) What criticism is David Cameron...

Words: 68254 - Pages: 274

Premium Essay

Politics Exam Edinbrugh

...Northern Consortium United Kingdom – Politics Past paper questions for June exam < Module 1 > Section A 1a What are the differences between Public Bills Committees and Select Committees? [5] Public Bills Committee is part of legislative process, whereas Select Committee is part of scrutiny process. In the former committee, the bill is examined by line by line to ensure that its wording and language is clear to allow any amendments on the bill. In the latter committee, there are two departments – governmental and non-governmental. They examine government departments’ expeditures , policies and policies. There are between 16 to 50 members in the PBC who are selected by Committee of Selection whose 7 out 9 members are ships. On the other hand, there are 11 members in the SCs and to eliminate “the conflict of interest, all the members are backbench members who are elected using the Alternative vote system. 2a What are the main functions of Parliament and how well does it perform them? [5] < This question is a 20-mark question > 3a What are the differences between direct and representative democracy? [5] In direct democracy, people are directly involved in decision-making processes, whereas in representative democracy, people elect MPs who will represent and form a government in Parliament. For instance, some qualified members of Athenian society were involved in decision-making and a referendum is a limited form of direct democracy. Also general elections...

Words: 18470 - Pages: 74

Premium Essay

Clean Air Act

...Clean Air Act Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7401 et seq.        -- Enforced by US EPA -- By the end of this lecture you should be able to describe: * The race to laxity * What NAAQS means. * The federal government’s role in cooperative federalism * 7 criteria pollutants * A hazardous pollutant under the CAA * Non-attainment area * Emissions trading programs * Noise pollution under the CAA * The four Class I areas designated by the State of Florida * The four emissions regulated by Title II of the Clean Air Act relating to motorized vehicles * How long a waiver is good for and to how much of an auto manufacturer’s production does it apply to. * What city is the Title II pollution numbers based on. * What is a clean fuel vehicle. LOOK for *** as pointers NOTE     Most of the narrative on the lectures in this course has been modified from:                     - Plater et al. Environmental Law and Policy: Nature, Law and Society, 1992.                     - Findley and Farber. Environmental Law, 2008. Background Air and water are common resources and are sometimes referred to by lay-people as “pollution sinks,” implying that airsheds and water bodies are large vats into which pollutants can be thrown as a large disposal.  As we saw with the Clean Water Act, this isn’t true.  While both airsheds and water bodies can handle some amount of pollution without significant degradation, airsheds and water...

Words: 12597 - Pages: 51

Premium Essay

Federalism

...What is Federalism? Strayer University Debra Gordon To fulfill the requirements for POL110 Professor August 10, 2014 Abstract Federalism is an ideal structure of government for a nation whose citizens are divided by specific values or interests such as culture, distance or resources. In fact, federalism is a governmental system with different levels that are supreme or largely sovereign in different areas. In this essay, the main idea of federalism is described. In addition, advantages and disadvantages of federalism are identified throughout the essay. Moreover, the problems of government of a nation divided by culture, distance or resources are discussed. It is concluded that federal systems ought to distribute a balance of power between the general and constituent governments in order to fulfill different level requirements. Provide three (3) examples of how federalism has evolved from its origin to the American political system in place today. Federalism refers to the form of government that unites separate political entities or states within a single national system. However, federalism has a principle which allows each political entity or state to retain its independence. There are a number of countries that adopt the idea of federalism to form their government. A state that follows the federal system is known as federation. In fact, a federation is a political union of several states, by which effect is given to a certain state or stage of political thought...

Words: 3947 - Pages: 16