Free Essay

Together as One

In:

Submitted By Peter30100
Words 3817
Pages 16
Together as One
Often described as a “melting pot”, the United States of America has a rich history of welcoming immigrants, with their many traditions and customs, with open arms. Before the founding fathers signed their declaration, the “New World” of America was already viewed as a safe haven and land of freedom for those escaping religious and social persecution. As our nation developed, the stream of immigrants increased, fueling industrialization through the mid to late 1800s. On the heels of the Industrial Revolution, immigration numbers spiked, leading to Emergency Quota Acts in the 1920s. Such restrictions continued through the rest of the century, changing the ethnic makeup of the United States. In recent years, heated discussions concerning immigration have emerged on the national political platform. As the nation’s leaders reevaluate the role of immigrants in the United States, from a legal perspective it is important to remember the influence such people have had on the nation’s social, cultural, and economical history. Since the founding of the United States, numerous legislative acts that have been passed by the government, in order to regulate the immigrants entering to America. In 1798, four such laws were passed by the United States Congress. Referred to as the Alien and Sedition Acts, these laws were created due to the fear of war with France, and they were intended to strengthen the Federal Government. Sponsored by the Federalist Party, the Acts also outlined the process through which one could become a citizen of the nation. The first law, was called the Naturalization Act, which was passed on June 18th. This law stated that an alien had to be a resident of the United States for fourteen years, in order to become a citizen. Previously, an alien needed to reside in the nation for only five years. On June 25th, 1978, the second law was passed, the Alien Act, stated that the President of the United States could deport any alien that they felt were a danger to the peace and safety of the nation. Congress passed a third law on July 6th, called the Alien Enemies Act. This act allowed the United States Government the ability to arrest, deport and imprison any person that was accused of helping or aiding an enemy power during a period of war. On July 14th, Congress passed the Sedition Law, the fourth and final legislation of the series. This law stated that any person who wrote malicious material could be subject to fines and imprisonment, whether or not they were a citizen of the United States. As a result of this law, a large number of citizens were arrested and fined. Due to the American public’s disappointment, a Republican President was voted into office. Shortly after becoming President, Thomas Jefferson reversed the Sedition Act, freeing men from jail and repaying their fines in full. The year was 1819 and for the first time in the United States, the government passed a law that required any vessel arriving in the United States have a manifest of all passengers on board. This law was called, the Manifest of Immigrants Act of March 2, 1819. This law required the manifest to report the age, sex, occupation, and country of origin for each passenger. While it may not appear to be a major law in American history, this was the first time the United States kept a record of any immigrants upon arrival to the country. Throughout the following years, the United States saw a surge of Irish emigrants flocking to the nation, due to Irelands Potato Famine in 1846. Before the Potato Famine, the Irish had already started migrating to the United States, and finding work on the Erie Canal, and others helped build the railroads. The Irish brought with them a long line of poverty, and that did not change when they migrated to America. Many were skilled workers and were able to offer their talents to help grow the United States. Unfortunately, the Irish that came to the States following the famine were impoverished people marked by a smaller skill set and a less structured religious belief. Many of the Christians in the United States embraced the opportunity to help educate the Irish about God. The Irish had a difficult time fitting in, rejected by many Americans who did not approve of them. Unfortunately, many of the Americans adopted a view of the Irish influenced by the British: “Though many of the Irish emigrants are, doubtless, persons of small means, who have been hoarding and saving for years, and living in rags and squalor, in order to amass sufficient money to carry themselves and families across the Atlantic, and to beg their way to the western states, where they may “squat” or purchase cheap lands, the great bulk appear to be people of the most destitute class, who go to join their friends and relatives, previously established in America.” At the time of the Irish Emigration, the United States was struggling with its own internal changes. During the years of the United States Civil War, the Union Government implemented The Contract Labor Act in 1864, as a means of encouraging immigration. This Act was written to attract people from England, Belgium, France, and other northern European countries in order to provide employers with workers including miners, puddlers, mechanics, machinists, and other skilled labors. By law, these immigrants were required to pay their passage from their home country, and whatever they would need to live. Viewed as a type of indentured servant, these workers received no wage during the repayment period. In 1868, four years later the Act was repealed, while the Foran Act of 1885 further prohibited the use of any contract laborers. The 1850s in America was a very drastic time, and in California prospectors struck gold. The finding of gold in the United States allowed for more laborers to be shipped over from other countries, mainly China. Beginning during the gold rush of the 1850s, Chinese immigrants also held other positions which included agricultural jobs, and factory work, especially in the garment industry. Many of the Chinese became entrepreneurs and developed successful businesses, resulting in greater numbers of arriving immigrants. With the emergence of anti-Chinese groups, the Chinese Exclusion Act was established, and ultimately soured relations between the two countries.
From 1880 to 1890, the United States welcomed nearly two million immigrants to the nation, despite the Federal government having restricted Chinese Immigration. Known as the Chinese Exclusion Act, it was passed on May 6, 1882. Considered to be one of the most significant restrictions on free immigration in the history of the nation, the Chinese Exclusion Act prohibited all immigration of Chinese laborers. This legislation was the result of dissatisfaction amongst Americans with the Chinese. “American objections to Chinese immigration took many forms, and generally stemmed from economic and cultural tensions, as well as ethnic discrimination.” Many Chinese came to America to support their families back in China by sending money back to their homeland. In addition to supporting families at home, the Chinese had to repay their shipping merchants, who funded their trip to America. Due to their willingness to work any job at nearly any wage, native citizens became upset, because Americans required more money to live and support their own families. Citizens of America found that they would be undercut by the Chinese, because of their willingness to do same work for less money. “Furthermore, as with most immigrant communities, many Chinese settled in their own neighborhoods, and tales spread of Chinatowns as places where large numbers of Chinese men congregated to visit prostitutes, smoke opium, or gamble.” Many legislators would argue the positive effects of the Chinese in America. The Democratic Party in the West led an initiative to remove the Chinese from the United States. In order not to offend the Chinese Government, President Hayes sought a revision of the Burlingame-Seward Treaty, but not prohibit, Chinese immigration, while also confirming the obligation of the United States to protect the rights of those immigrants already arrived. This was eventually reversed when the Chinese Exclusion Act passed in 1882. “The Act also required every Chinese person traveling in or out of the country to carry a certificate identifying his or her status as a laborer, scholar, diplomat, or merchant.” The Act was the first in U.S. History to put such restrictions on any immigrants.
In 1888, the Government took the Act an even extra step, and passed the Scott Act. Which made reentry back to the United States from China impossible, no matter how long you lived in the United States, legal citizen or not,. In 1892 the Federal Government of the United States voted to renew the Act for ten more years in the Geary Act. Then again in 1902, they passed for another ten years, except this time if fell over Hawaii and the Philippines. Congress later then passed the Exclusion Act indefinitely. When scholars look on American Immigration, they cannot look passed a little island in the New York Harbor. In 1892, the government opened and constructed a new Federally-operated immigration station on this island. “From 1892 to 1954, over twelve million immigrants entered the United States through the portal of Ellis Island.” During their voyages to America, people would pay for their passage and would be labeled. The label of First, Second, or Third class on board would decide on how you would be inspected upon arrival. First and Second class passengers would undergo a cursory inspection aboard their ship. The belief being, that if you could afford a first or second class ticket, then you were less likely to become a public charge in America. The only way for a first or second class passenger to get inspected by an official on Ellis Island, was if they were sick or had legal issues.
Unfortunately, this was not the case for third class passengers. The “Steerage” or the third class voyagers would have extremely harsh traveling conditions. More than likely they would be in a crowded storage area on the bottom deck of the vessel. When the ship would dock they would have to wait for the First and Second class passengers to clear the boat, and then they would be transported to Ellis Island by ferry. Upon arrival of the Third class voyagers, they would go through a series of medical and legal inspections in order to enter the United States. If the immigrant had all of their papers and were in good health the total time of inspection could last from three to five hours.
Ellis Island would become known as “The Island of Tears”, despite the fact that the majority of immigrants were treated with respect and courtesy. It would only take a few short hours, before most immigrants were granted entry into their new home. Unfortunately, not all immigrants were allowed to enter. Only two percent of the immigrants were denied access to the United States. If one did not pass the inspections conducted by the United States Public Health Service and the Bureau of Immigration they would be refused entry. There were very few reasons why an immigrant would not be allowed to access to the New World, these reasons include, if one had a contagious disease and if an immigrant was to be used as an illegal contract laborer.
Several immigration officials in the early 1900s, made the mistake in believing that the peak of immigration has already occurred. This was not the case, immigration had its peak year in 1907. More immigrants came to America in 1907 than any other year; approximately 1.25 million immigrants were processed at Ellis Island.
In 1905 across the United States another island to dictate and control immigration opened. The island was located in the San Francisco Bay, and was called Angel Island, also known as United States Immigration Station. Unfortunately, Angel Island was not as welcoming to immigrants as Ellis Island was. The majority of the emigrants were Chinese, in fact it was nearly impossible for someone from China to enter the United States due to the Chinese Exclusion Act. The Act that passed in 1882, kept the majority of the future Chinese out of the country, but the legislation could not keep the sons and daughters of now U.S. citizens from emigrating. Men and women could become a citizen by providing the proper documentation and evidence that they were the children of United States citizens, these people became known as “Paper Sons” and “Paper Daughters”. Unfortunately, it seemed to be extremely difficult for one prove that they had family that was a United States Citizen. Angel Island became more of an interrogation and detention center then an immigration port. The process to prove that the paperwork was legitimate could take as little as several weeks to a month. There were some emigrants that it took up to two years to provide validity to the paperwork. Nevertheless, hundreds of thousands of emigrants were able to find a new life, in their new homeland.
Immigration began to slow down in the 1910s, in large part due to World War I. A bulky amount of suspected enemy aliens were brought to Ellis Island from all over the nation and would be transferred to different locations in the U.S. The United States Navy, was put in charge of Ellis Island during wartime, and they decided who could come into America. “Hundreds were later deported based upon the principal of guilt by association with any organizations advocating revolution against the Federal government.” With the end of World War I, immigration became a large debate amongst politicians who wanted to limit immigrants coming to the America. In 1917, Congress would pass a law that would have a widespread effect on the world, where formerly the focus appeared to be on Asia. The Immigration Act of 1917 was passed by Congress, and this became the first law to provide literacy test to immigrants. The Immigration Act was vetoed four times, by four different Presidents before it passed. While President Woodrow Wilson was in office, Congress was able to pass the law regardless of his objections.
The law changed the many prior acts, to now limit and regulate immigration. The head tax on an immigrant was changed to eight dollars, which was previously four dollars. Also included was a list of “undesirables”, this encompassed an extremely large amount of people, including but not limited to “idiots,” “feeble-minded persons,” “epileptics,” “insane persons,” alcoholics, “professional beggars,” all persons “mentally or physically defective,” polygamists, and anarchists…” An exclusion of anyone sixteen or older who could not read thirty to forty words of their desired language. One key component of the Act was restricting any immigration from the “Asiatic Barred Zone” The Asiatic Barred Zone covered most of Asia, and a large amount of Middle Eastern countries. This was a large factor in the passing of this act, now instead of Japan and China, most of Asia has now been restricted. Surprisingly, this did not have much of a role in slowing down immigration. The year the act passed, more than 800,000 immigrants came to the United States and less than two thousand had to take literacy test. It was not until the Quota system was passed that immigration came to a screeching halt.
In 1921, immigration into America became extremely difficult. On May 19th, the Emergency Quota Act was passed and a brand new system of allowing immigrants into the United States was introduced. The Act used a mathematical system, involving the U.S. Census, which would allow entrance to the U.S. up to three percent of each nationality. The law would vary drastically between the countries. This Act lasting only 3 short years would quickly be replaced, by the passing of the Johnson-Reed Act in 1924.
The Immigration Act of 1924, was the first act to issue visas to immigrants, only up to two percent of the nation’s quota. The government not only changed the percentage, but also pushed back the census date ten years. The act completely excluded people from Asia, and was a main focal point for European countries. Legislation also decided to define who could enter as a “non-quota” immigrant, the list included wives and children under the age of 18. The law also changed after 1927, where instead of allowing quotas for each nationality in the country. The government put an overall quota of 150,000 immigrants a year with a minimum quota of 100 and it was to be split up among the nations. The act was to completely uphold and preserve the American homogeneity, by increasing the standards of how to gain citizenship in the U.S. The Johnson-Reed Act remained in place until 1965, when the Hart-Celler Act was passed.
In 1965, the Immigration and Nationality Act was passed, also known as the Hart-Celler Act. The law completely abolished the National Origins Quota System. Pushing aside the use of a numerical method of allowing immigrants into the U.S., the government would decide whether or not one could acquire a visa. The visa amount was amplified from 150,000 to 170,000, and one would be received depending on skills and relationships with family in the U.S. With few revisions the Hart-Celler Act, is still used in the United States today.
The United States of America has been a destination of many different immigrants, since its discovery by Eastern European Countries in 1492. Individuals from all over the World have come and established themselves as a part of the United States, bringing with them culture, roles in society, and participation to help develop the nation. Many of the immigrants come from nothing, most have been excluded from the U.S., and a large amount have been sent back to where they traveled from. No matter the difference in age, sex, occupation, and origins, everyone has an opportunity in the United States today.

Bibliography
Primary Sources
Boston Recorder (1830-1849), Irish Immigrants.: What Shall Be Done For Them. May 1, 1835
Cohen, Bruce Hanlan, James P. "Contract Labor Act (1864)." In Historical Encyclopedia of American Labor. Santa Barbara: ABC CLIO ,2004. http://search.credoreference.com.proxy.libraries.uc.edu/content/entry/abcamlabor/contract_labor_act_1864/0 (accessed April 19, 2014.) Document 63: Act of February 5, 1917: Immigration Act of 1917, Regulation the Immigration of Aliens to and Residence of Aliens in the United State. (39 Stat. 874; 8 U.S.C.) US Immigration and Naturalization Laws and Issues pg.109-112 Manifest of Immigrants Act of March 2, 1819 (3 Stat. 489) US Immigration and Naturalization Laws and Issues pg. 20 Ngai, Mae. Impossible Subjects: Illegal Aliens and the Making of Modern America. Princeton University Press. 2004. pp.264
The Illustrated London News, The Tide of Emigration to the United States and to the British Colonies, July 6, 1850
Secondary Sources
1921 Emergency Quota Law (An act to limit the immigration of aliens into the United States)H.R. 4075; Pub.L. 67-5; 42 Stat. 5. 67th Congress; May 19, 1921. http://library.uwb.edu/guides/USimmigration/1921_emergency_quota_law.html
1965 Immigration and Nationality Act, a.k.a. the Hart-Cellar Act (An Act to amend the Immigration and Nationality Act, and for other purposes)H.R. 2580; Pub.L. 89-236; 79 Stat. 911.89th Congress; October 3, 1965. http://library.uwb.edu/guides/usimmigration/1965_immigration_and_nationality_act.html “Angel Island: A Brief History of the US Immigration Station” http://www.angelisland.com/united_states_immigration_station/usis_history.php
Bromberg, Howard. “Immigration Act of 1917 The Law: Federal law imposing major new restrictions on categories of people allowed to immigrate”. Published: 14-02-2012, 11:12 http://immigrationinamerica.org/588-immigration-act-of-1917.html
Chinese Immigration and the Chinese Exclusion Acts, Office of the Historian, Bureau of Public Affairs, United States Department of State. http://history.state.gov/milestones/1866-1898/chinese-immigration “Ellis Island History”, The National Park Service, http://www.ellisisland.org/genealogy/ellis_island_history.asp
The Alien and Sedition Acts from 1798, from Folwell's "Laws of the U.S.", http://www.earlyamerica.com/earlyamerica/milestones/sedition/

--------------------------------------------
[ 1 ]. The Alien and Sedition Acts from 1798, from Folwell's "Laws of the U.S.", http://www.earlyamerica.com/earlyamerica/milestones/sedition/
[ 2 ]. Manifest of Immigrants Act of March 2, 1819 (3 Stat. 489) US Immigration and Naturalization Laws and Issues pg. 20
[ 3 ]. Manifest of Immigrants Act of March 2, 1819 (3 Stat. 489) pg. 20
[ 4 ]. Boston Recorder (1830-1849), Irish Immigrants.: What Shall Be Done For Them. May 1, 1835
[ 5 ]. The Illustrated London News, The Tide of Emigration to the United States and to the British Colonies, July 6, 1850
[ 6 ]. Cohen, Bruce Hanlan, James P. "Contract Labor Act (1864)." In Historical Encyclopedia of American Labor. Santa Barbara: ABC CLIO ,2004. http://search.credoreference.com.proxy.libraries.uc.edu/content/entry/abcamlabor/contract_labor_act_1864/0 (accessed April 19, 2014.)
[ 7 ]. Chinese Immigration and the Chinese Exclusion Acts, Office of the Historian, Bureau of Public Affairs, United States Department of State. http://history.state.gov/milestones/1866-1898/chinese-immigration
[ 8 ]. Chinese Immigration and the Chinese Exclusion Acts
[ 9 ]. Chinese Immigration and the Chinese Exclusion Acts
[ 10 ]. Chinese Immigration and the Chinese Exclusion Acts
[ 11 ]. Chinese Immigration and the Chinese Exclusion Acts
[ 12 ]. “Ellis Island History”, The National Park Service, http://www.ellisisland.org/genealogy/ellis_island_history.asp
[ 13 ]. “Ellis Island History”
[ 14 ]. “Ellis Island History”
[ 15 ]. “Ellis Island History”
[ 16 ]. “Ellis Island History”
[ 17 ]. “Ellis Island History”
[ 18 ]. “Angel Island: A Brief History of the US Immigration Station” http://www.angelisland.com/united_states_immigration_station/usis_history.php
[ 19 ]. “Angel Island: A Brief History of the US Immigration Station”
[ 20 ]. “Ellis Island History”
[ 21 ]. Howard Bromberg, “Immigration Act of 1917 The Law: Federal law imposing major new restrictions on categories of people allowed to immigrate”. Published: 14-02-2012, 11:12
[ 22 ]. Document 63: Act of February 5, 1917: Immigration Act of 1917, Regulation the Immigration of Aliens to and Residence of Aliens in the United State. (39 Stat. 874; 8 U.S.C.) US Immigration and Naturalization Laws and Issues pg.109-112
[ 23 ]. Howard Bromberg, “Immigration Act of 1917 The Law: Federal law imposing major new restrictions on categories of people allowed to immigrate”
[ 24 ]. 1921 Emergency Quota Law (An act to limit the immigration of aliens into the United States)H.R. 4075; Pub.L. 67-5; 42 Stat. 5. 67th Congress; May 19, 1921. http://library.uwb.edu/guides/USimmigration/1921_emergency_quota_law.html
[ 25 ]. Mae Ngai. Impossible Subjects: Illegal Aliens and the Making of Modern America. Princeton University Press. 2004. pp.264
[ 26 ]. 1965 Immigration and Nationality Act, a.k.a. the Hart-Cellar Act (An Act to amend the Immigration and Nationality Act, and for other purposes)H.R. 2580; Pub.L. 89-236; 79 Stat. 911.89th Congress; October 3, 1965.

Similar Documents

Free Essay

The Working List

...to·geth·er (tə-gĕth′ər)adv.1. In or into a single group, mass, or place: We gather together.2. In or into contact: The cars crashed together. She mixed the chemicals together.3. a. In association with or in relationship to one another; mutually or reciprocally: getting along together.b. By joint or cooperative effort: We ironed the entire load of clothes together.4. Regarded collectively; in total: She is worth more than all of us together. Considered together, the proposals made little sense.5. In or into a unified structure or arrangement: put the food processor together.6. Simultaneously: The bells rang out together.7. In harmony or accord: We stand together on this issue.8. Informal Into an effective, coherent condition: Get yourself together.adj. Slang 1. Emotionally stable and effective in performance: She's really together.2. In tune with what is going on; hip.Idiom: get/put it all together Slang To unify and harmonize one's resources so as to perform with maximal effectiveness.[Middle English, from Old English tōgædere; see ghedh- in Indo-European roots.]to·geth′er·ness n.Usage Note: Together with is often used following the subject of a sentence or clause to introduce an addition. The addition, however, does not alter the number of the verb, which is governed by the subject: The king (singular), together with two aides, is expected soon. The same is true of along with, besides, and in addition to. See Usage Notes at besides, like2. | The American Heritage® Dictionary...

Words: 713 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Module 4 Defense Mechanisms

...final draft Marriage Versus living together I choose this topic because it is a difficult decision that many of us make in todays world. Statistics say that married people are healthier, happier, live longer, have higher income, less violence and more fulfilled then couples living together. I feel it may be true for some couples but not all. Couples might choose to live together instead of geeting married because one has a huge amount of debt. Marrying them will have collection agencies going after their money. When you are married both incomes are counted when applying for grants, loans and state help. Its somtimes much easier not to marry, rather thann not ge help ones family needs because of combined incomes. I think couples might choose to live together without marriage because of their financial situation. Now in days people can not make ends meet living alone. Some couples live together in case the marriage does not work. They do not have to worry about cost of divorce and all the paper work that is involved. Now in days most of the population live together firs before becoming marry. I know young people age around 18 and 20 are more likely to move in together or start a relationship faster than older adults. This day in time alot of adults are waiting later years to make this commitments. Because of younger age lack of maturity. My fiance and I have lived together for 5 years because of difference we...

Words: 484 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Marrage vs Living Together

...Marriage versus living together. Craig Moody ENC1101-12 Colin Lessig December 12, 2011 As a live in relationship I have done both and I know a live in relationship can retain as much or more love, permanency and stability then a lot of marriages. Really it depends on the couple in the relationship. You cannot honestly on a board bases say which is better for people that live together or married that are more committed. Some people would say that when you are not married that you have more freedom but you do not you have just as much freedom as if you were married. Others would say that there are two types of people living together; those that are engaged and living together for a brief time before marriage and those people that live together without definite plans of marriage. Some couples live together before marriage because they might have poor communication skills with each other, and do not want to spoil what they have which in turn could affect their relationship with one another. Marriage is the foundation for family in most modern societies. It is a contract arrangement that is binding two people together by law and is legally recognized would wide. Living together on the other hand, mimics the structure of marriage without the legal binding contract and also the exception of being legal. In some countries or states common law marriages are recognized, completely along with the legal ramifications in the event of dissolution or in some cases of an annulment...

Words: 997 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Personal Essay

...two separate families. Having a blended family takes a lot of work from both the sides of both the parents and the children because of the hardships on the family when the mother and father divorce, then meeting and getting to know the new family members, and learning to work with the new family members as one whole family unit instead of two separate families. The hardships on the family when the mother and father divorce can hurt the family structure but as long as everyone works together it can be rebuilt to be a healthier relationship for everyone involved. With my family, we had a rough divorce process and we had a lot of hate within the family. My brother, sister, and I grew closer together when the divorce happened and our bond was strengthened as we were unsure of what was to come but with hard work, determination, and both parents being helpful together to keep our family as a single unit we were able to come through this hard time as a single unit and progress to our parents going out and meeting new people. We went through the hard times by doing family activities with each parent and worked together as a unit as the tough times progressed. We all had to come together as a family and...

Words: 1030 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Group and Teams Paper

...though teams and groups can be confused as one in the same; there are differences between the two. Teams and groups offer certain differences in real world corporate applications. According to Articlesbase, Difference Between a Group and a Team; Strengths of a team can rely on the fact that the members of a team have similarities in the purpose and there is interconnectivity between the individual members. Whereas a group is larger in number and the group’s strength could be assessed from the fact that they need to be willing to execute the commands of a leader. (David, J. 2009). Although teams and groups deliver different things to an organization they are still the comings together of diverse individuals. Organizations spend time focusing on team building. Teams come together to work equally through their own diverse backgrounds in order to work together to deliver success from their organization. Teams continually work together in an organization to meet certain criteria that has been delegated through them within a single organization. Organizations can use team building to help address smaller issues that higher managerial positions can become unaware of. Teams are able to be the voice that bridges the different steps of an organization together. They can do this by using their skills to speak at staff meetings and to have learning clinics for others to become involved. A team offers skills that can be complimentary to one another to achieve continual growth. Each...

Words: 732 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

I Have a Dream

...The True American Dream One hundred years later, the Negro still is not free-MLK. In the speech, “I have a dream” by Martin Luther King Jr, he speaks of African-Americans, not receiving the civil rights they were promised when The Emancipation Proclamation was signed One Hundred years prior. He spoke of black people not getting the freedom promised by the U.S. Constitution, as well as all races working together with no violence to achieve peace, also spoke of his dream of a future where everyone could get along. Martin Luther King Jr, speaks about blacks still not getting the freedom promised. Even after slavery, the acts of segregation and discrimination were worse than imagined and King felt it when he said, “ One hundred years later, the life of the Negro is still sadly crippled by the manacles of segregation and the chains of discrimination.” After Slavery, these acts worsened due to the fact that many people believed that granting the slaves freedom, should not have happened. Also, One hundred years later the people could not get over a problem they had because of skin color, and their feeling of superiority. Black people at the time, were shunned, and could not live properly, due to segregation and discrimination, like when King said, “ the Negro is still languished in the corners of American society and finds himself an exile in his own land “. Black people as well as any other races, are part of society and should be able to live normal lives without the bonds...

Words: 927 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Merger Acquisition

...business that was initially separate entities come together and forms a corporation together and operates as one new entity (Chandra, 2005).  To this effect, several reasons can be put across to explain why separate business entities decide to merge together with their competitors in the global market and operate as one new corporation or business entity. In this paper we shall examine T-Mobile and MetroPCS Company who merged in 2012 with their new headquarters in Bellevue. One of the reasons that lead to merging together of the two companies was the need of maximizing shareholders wealth or profits. In this respect, by merging together as one corporation T-Mobile and MetroPCS estimated that they will automatically reduce competition that they faced from each other thus the business or the new corporation will monopolize the entire market thus it will be in a good position to maximize profits. Secondly T-Mobile and MetroPCS merged with the motive of diversifying its risks in the global market. The global society that we live today is full of diverse political and economic upheavals that may weigh down on single business thus by merging with business organization in different countries the corporation, will stand a better chance of minimizing foreign exchange risks in foreign countries that the organization or corporation is operating its businesses. Thirdly, another motive that drove the two businesses to merge together was the need to acquire more finances or capital for...

Words: 1288 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Art Museum

...Linnette Gomez Professor Lisa Rockford 16 November 2011 Boca Art Museum An artist’s perspective gives a curious audience a world of creativity displaying emotion, talent, and intelligence. The Boca Art Museum contains extraordinary galleries with many interesting pieces of art that come together to create an entire work of art in unity, and different portraits and framework with a variety of mediums. Viewers can see abstract sculptors placed in the outside garden giving the audience self-thought of understanding strange pieces that could mean anything; the meaning is individualized. The first gallery in the museum exhibits many different portraits of people, made up of different mediums such as pen and ink on paper, graphite on paper, and acrylic on canvas. A portrait created by the artist, “Pavel Tchelitchew,” named Mere Parizot a portrait of his mother, made it out of pen and ink on paper. The paper looks dyed or if it was once white or if it just colored through age. The detail of the portrait looks complicated with many lines to emphasize the features of the profile; the shading seems to be used by bleeding ink through the quill. Lighter areas have less bleeding. Another portrait created by the artist Jeri Metz, made a portrait of a woman named Selma out of graphite on paper. There is not any explanation of relation to this woman but the detail looks well shaded. Darker areas are smeared closely to create the darker areas when lighter areas the graphite is smeared farther...

Words: 1396 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Barbara Mclusky Case Summary

...Hampshire (RHM Estates v Hampshire, 18 AD3d 326 [1st Dept 2005].), a landlord sued and attempted to evict a tenant after the death of the tenant of record. The respondent lived in the apartment for 15 years without paying rent. The two tenants traveled together frequently, ate breakfast together, and took care of each other (Id.) The court held that although there was no evidence of intermingling of finances, the absence of this factor did not refute the fact that the tenant and respondent had a family-style relationship (Id.) According to the rule no single factor is solely determinative, because of this the landlord was not permitted to evict the tenant from his residence....

Words: 2123 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Should People Move in or Stay Together Before They Get Married

...Should people move in and stay together before they get married. What is the pros and cons of it? This is a common and important question. Cohabitation -- living together without the commitment of marriage -- is on the rise. And it's a good idea to examine your fears and ask questions before making this important step. Although increasing numbers of individuals report less social stigma about cohabitation, many of the people who I've counseled ask these key questions: will living together lead to marriage and will it increase risk of divorce? What are your motivations for living together? Based on discussing this question, you may find out that your partner is simply trying to save money by sharing the rent. If you want to develop a deeper bond, and most significantly, you see cohabitation as a step toward marriage, these differing expectations may be a problem. Pros * Research about whether living together before marriage increases your risk for divorce is less definitive. It's unclear if it actually increases the risk. If individuals who cohabitate are at a slightly higher risk for divorce, it may not be because they lived together before marriage. It could speak more to their mindset about commitment in general. Is it just greater acceptance of divorce in general? Is it that people who live together have a weaker commitment to the institution of marriage? It depends on who you ask. * Learn to Live Together Before Breaking the Bank on a Wedding This is wayyyy...

Words: 1735 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Premarital Cohabitation

...Increasingly, children are growing up in cohabiting households, rather than with married parents. Nearly 20 percent of births today are to cohabitating parents, according to Susan L. Brown at the Center for Family and Demographic Research.Almost 40 percent of children will spend time in a cohabiting household by age 16. Living together is now common, but it is not without consequence—particularly for children. The effects of this family structure on children are just beginning to be understood. However, initial research by Brown and others suggests cohabitation is generally a less stable family structure than married couple or single-mother households. While there is some evidence that children in cohabiting households fare worse than those in married or single-parent families on several key indicators (Manning & Lamb, 2003), what is less clear is why. Do these negative outcomes stem from something inherent in the family structure? Or are these effects due to the types of parents who choose to cohabit (rather than to the experience of cohabitation itself)? How does living in a cohabiting household affect both children and adults? Impact on Children Development Spending extended time in cohabiting households at an early age is linked to slowed cognitive growth and language acquisition in children. Brown notes that even in stablecohabiting households, children show smaller gains in mental development. The Urban Institute finds children in cohabiting homes are also less...

Words: 7560 - Pages: 31

Premium Essay

Living Before Marriage

...why it is interesting or important to you. One day ago, I read an article about young adults living together before marriage and I felt very interested about this article. According to one survey on 228 young adults living together before marriage, Master Luu Phuong Thao (The center of sociology - Institute of Social Sciences in Southern region) showed that: 77.3% young people living together from 1 to 2 years before marriage expected to get married. This ratio is only 58.8% after more than three years living together. At first, young people were very excited to care for each other, be together as a young family. However, after day by day, they will feel tired because of difficulties in the money, pregnant unexpected or fights together. They will feel that they lost faith in the common life and their choices are wrong. Finally, research has shown that people who live together before marriage dare to live together but they cannot have enough bravery to face the whisper of public opinion. After reading this article, I thought very carefully about that. In my opinions, living together before marriage is a bad idea because I made a mistake before. It is the reason why I think this article is very important with me and other women. First, I discovered that those who live together before marriage will have unhappier marriages because they regarded marriage as a less important part of their life than those who did not live together before marriage. Second, I figure out that if...

Words: 527 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Living Together or Getting Married

...Terri Ruth 1 Kim Oesterle Eng 0099 Nov 1, 2012 Living Together and Getting Married One of the most debatable questions of recent times is whether to live together or get married. Live-in relationships and marriages can be successful with hard work and commitment. In today’s society living together is considered normal compared to the traditions of the past. Years ago it was considered sinful to do so. So, the question is, should a couple live together or get married? You decide. One main reason for doing either type of commitment is for financial gain. Both living together and in marriage gives couples the opportunity for this. When a couple lives together they have larger chances of saving money for their future. This can include saving for things such as, purchasing their first home together, buying new furniture, and even joint saving investments. If they are married they can save financially on health and medical expenses, insurance costs, and everyday living such as utilities and survival needs. A major fallback for the decision of living together is one of tradition. The old fashion society we live in looks down on couples whom cohabitate before marriage. This type of disapproval can cause couples to deny and hide aspects of their relationship putting stress in their every day lives. Their thoughts of happiness and joy begin to turn to thoughts of disgust and they may begin questioning their selves on whether they made the right decision. ...

Words: 358 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Against the Broken Family

... With marriage, couples will show seriousness in working together to make their relationship powerful and faithful if love is present. Some people who are in love get inspiration to get married soon enough to build the bright expectation for their future together. In order to get a step on that stair you need someone who loves and cares about you deeply. The motivation that leads people to get married is the feeling of loneliness. When couples are married, they will not feel alone even if they are a thousand miles away from their own families because relationship between husband and wife is dominant with love. However, many of people in the United States prefer to live together before marriage so they can find out if they are capable getting along well together. From my perspective and my culture, living together before marriage has disadvantages to the couples, so people should get married in order to protect their rights and enjoy their lives together. One reason why I strongly support marriage over living together is that marriage will give the couple the energy to work on their strong commitment to each other. When people get married, they have full knowledge of what responsibilities involve with their marriage. And that will make the relationship last longer than ever. The partners share sorrow and happiness with each other and they also can face all the hardships together. But if they weren’t married, perhaps one partner would feel timid to tell the other person his or...

Words: 752 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Effective Group

...school football team is a good example of an effective group because our main focus was based on one pursued goal which was to win a championship. The team cohesiveness, brotherhood, communication and trust that our team displayed created team effectiveness. We developed a level of chemistry that couldn’t be matched by any other team in our league. I would like to start with giving examples of ways that our football team shared brotherhood and cohesiveness. Most of the players on our team lived in the same neighborhood therefore we would walk and from school together; we also attended football practice and spun all of our time during the summer together. The neighborhood was small and most of our parent knew each other. Whenever football season was over; we would visit each other homes and play video games or play different types of outside games. We all had dreams of being professional football players growing up. Playing street football was an everyday ritual afterschool or on our spare time. Since the majority of us had already known each other most of our lives; there wasn’t a problem of getting to know one another once football practice started. We were anxious to start playing right away. Things were not as we thought they would be ones spring practice started. There were kids who were new to our school that tried out for the team. It took a while to get everyone to use to one another. There was a lot of adversity in the beginning because we didn’t know anything about anyone...

Words: 1151 - Pages: 5