Free Essay

Tragic Heroes

In:

Submitted By adeolam
Words 2596
Pages 11
Adeola Mike-Irabor
English 1302: Composition 2
David Glen Smith, Instructor
November 29, 2012
Research Paper
Miss Emily Grierson and Eveline
The family and society’s expectation of a woman has led to some women becoming tragic heroes and anti-heroes who battled consistently with their true identity. Literary works of William Faulkner in the short story, "A Rose for Emily", and James Joyce’s "Eveline", reflects the negative impact of these expectations. Based on information, culled from Dr David Smith’s notes, tragic heroes are driven and obsessed with past deeds or by fate, they are neither entirely good nor entirely bad and are fated to cause grief to individuals or to the community, they are often leaders in the community or head of family (2). Faulkner shows these common traits of tragic hero in Miss Emily Grierson; a protagonist in self-exile from the modern world, locked away in her decaying mansion (3). In James Joyce’s Eveline, a protagonist is revealed as tragic hero who endures a dramatic and tragic life full of conflicts, but Smith thinks otherwise, he refers to her as an anti-hero and is of the opinion that antihero should not be confused with tragic hero because, “existentialist believed modern life does not allow the existence of a true hero. Modern life dehumanizes everyone”(3), short of this, Eveline is a classic example of a tragic hero. William Faulkner’s Miss Emily and James Joyce’s Eveline are women who in the quest of fulfilling the roles assigned to them by their family, lover, and society, cost them happiness and freedom. Faulkner in his short story, “A Rose for Emily” shows in a complex chronological sequence, the confliction between the past and present in a southern gothic style. Miss Emily Grierson, a old spinster, who was well respected in her town of Jefferson. Smith writes, “Her will is so strong, she rejects the notion of death. And likewise, despite the fact the town paints her as a symbol of the old ways, she acts against the traditional view of a “proper southern lady” courting a man out of her class despite public opinion…… She represents their history.” She would be considered, a sort of leader in her time, she was the last of her great family. “Alive, Miss Emily had been a tradition, a duty, and a care; a sort of hereditary obligation upon the town”(287) shows, that the town had some sort of respect for her. Miss Emily exhibits a lot of traits of a tragic heroes; she is a person to whom reality has eluded. She refuses to pay taxes claiming to have an exemption. She is unaware that the world had changed since she was caged in her mansion. She fought to death with her flawed belief. Her past, as the respectful and obedient daughter to a strict and selfish father, placed a lot of burden on her. Emotionally and psychologically eventually, she loses her mind. Her later years were affected mainly by role assigned to her by her father. Faulkner concludes the story on a macabre note, using the southern gothic style. “Then we noticed that in the second pillow was the indentation of a head. One of us lifted something from it, and leaning forward, that faint and invisible dust dry and acrid in the nostrils, we saw a long strand of iron-gray hair”(293). Obviously Miss Emily realized that she is doomed and may never find love, she becomes deluded as she murders her lover and lives with his decomposing corpse. Eveline, a young Irish girl who lived in Dublin is the main character in James Joyce’s short story, called "Eveline". She is also a protagonist like Miss Emily in Faulkner’s "A Rose for Emily.” Eveline’s mother also died when she was young. She felt she owed her mother the duty to take over her motherly role in their home, since she made a vow to her mother on her dying bed. As Joyce writes, “Strange that it should come that very night to remind of the promise to her mother, her promise to keep the home together as long as she could. She remembered the last night of her mother’s illness”(6). Eveline was responsible for the care of two younger Children and an abusive father. Invariably, she is now the mother and wife. She fell in love with a man named Frank, who offered an opportunity of change, "She was about to explore another life with Frank. Frank was very kind, manly open hearted. She was to go away with him by the night-boat to be his wife and to live with him in Buenos Ayres where he had a home waiting for her"(5). Initially, she agreed to leave with Frank believing he is her savior as Joyce reveals, “Escape! She must escape! Frank would save her. He will give her life, perhaps love too. But she wanted to live” (6). Just like the other tragic heroes and antiheroes she will not leave with her “savior”, Frank. Eveline remains in Dublin. She could have chosen to leave with Frank to start a new life and break away from her past, but just as she was ready to take the offer; the human vs. self-conflict sets in. As Warren Beck puts it in his critical essay, “ a far journey is projected but the timid protagonist, paralyzed by ambivalence at the moment of embarking from Dublin’s North Wall, never sets out.” She is fated to cause grief to herself.
Faulkner uses the first person plural in a complex chronological manner, using the southern gothic style of macabre to present the story of Miss Emily. Though the gender of the narrator was not revealed in the story, “our whole town went to her funeral: the men through a sort of respectful for a fallen monument, the women mostly out of curiosity to see the inside of the house”(287). It is assumed that narrator is woman, a “town gossip” who is in the know of everything happening in the town of Jefferson. Thomas Klein observed the narrator did not have an allegiance to a particular generation. Laura J. Getty defines the Rose in “A Rose for Emily” as a symbol of secrecy with mythological and religious connotations. She went further to explain that just as story chronology is complex so also the title. Faulkner utilizes various human senses of smell, sound and sight to further involve the reader in the plot when he described the house of Emily; “it smelled of dust and disuse – a close, dank smell” (288). While Joyce uses the third person point of view incorporating the narrative technique of stream of consciousness to tell the story of Eveline. According to Smith, “ looking through the window the action recreates memory of the past. Likewise, it shifts the reader into further atmospheric elements, plus moves the action into the particular thoughts of Eveline as an interior monologue (or stream of consciousness). Unlike Faulkner, there is less complexity in the chronology. Joyce also uses the human senses, the sense of smell; ”her head was leaned against the window curtains and in her nostrils was the odor of dusty cretonne”(4). “she was again in the close dark room at the other side of the hall and outside she heard a melancholy air of Italy;” the sense of sound. He also reveals the random thoughts and feelings that Eveline experiences at a single moment. Beck explains that the reader feels close to the characters, almost as if they could see inside the character’s heads.
Both characters, Miss Emily and Eveline were heavily affected by the roles their fathers played in their upbringing after the death of their mothers. These two men are their main antagonists.
Though Eveline’s father was still alive when she got the opportunity of changing her destiny . Emily based on her circumstances and setting never got a get -away opportunity rather she became disillusioned and withdrawn acting strangely refusing to accept changes and move on with life. May be Emily’s story would have been different if she was able to keep a relationship like Eveline did, “They learnt from their mistake, but this fact can not save them from their fate”(2), Yes, Eveline had a better opportunity of escaping from her antagonist but she was unable to use it, another trait of tragic Hero.
Emily’s father chased way all suitors under the disguise of protection. “We remember all the young men her father had driven away” (290), “None of the young were quite good enough for Miss Emily”(289). Emily ‘s father was a selfish man who kept her from having relationships because he saw in her the perfect housekeeper he needed. Even after his death she still could not keep any relationship with men, her lovers came and left because of the way her father treated her. There was no record of Emily having friends and living the normal life of a young girl, so basically, her father was the only companion or friend she knew. The narrator went further to show that, there was no family member with whom she had relationship, her father had quarreled with them, “she had some kin in Alabama; but years ago her father had fallen out with them…”(289). When her father died the people of Jefferson understand why she acted the way she did. “We did not say she was crazy then. ….We knew that with nothing left, she would have to cling to that which robbed her as people will”(289). Her father had robbed every opportunity of living a normal life, so even in death, he was all she knew. Smith also shows her as “a character, to whom reality and illusion blur”(5). She refused to acknowledge the death of her father whom she pictured as her protector and friend, he meant a lot to her; he was the only man in her life. He simply cannot be dead. She went further to tell the town people he was still alive. Obviously, she attracted pity instead of condemnation. Emily found love in Homer baron and this time she will not let him go like the others, instead she had plans to keep for eternity by poisoning him. Getty writes, that Jack Scherting’s Freudian reading of “A Rose for Emily” uses the sub-rosa concept only to suggest that Emily’s attachment to her father had lasting repercussions: “the Oedipal desire expressed in Emily’s affair with Homer was never recognized by the people of Jefferson. The people of Jefferson allowed Emily cling to Homer Baron’s body knowing fully well that he was in her house. Getty writes, that the Rose of the title extends far beyond any one flower or literary allusion in its implications for the story’s structure. The Rose represents secrecy: the confidential relationship between the author and his character, with all of the privileged information withheld.” Poor Emily she died with her flawed belief system.
Eveline’s father, is her antagonist, Joyce was able to give a hint of what life was before her mother’s demise “Still they seemed to have been rather happy then. Her father was not so bad then; and besides, her mother was still alive”(4) unlike Emily, she was not from an affluent home, so she needed to work and make money to support the family because her father will not rise up to his responsibility of caring for the family, “Besides, the invariable squabble for money on Saturday nights had begun to weary her unspeakably. She always gave her entire wages –seven shillings-and Harry always sent up what he could but the trouble was to get any money from her father”(4). To further buttress this fact and show how abusive he was, Joyce writes, “He said she used to squander the money, that she had no head, that he was not going to give her his hard-earned money to throw to the streets and much more”(5). She was under pressure to take care of the family at a young age, “It was hard work - a hard life”(5). Like Emily she too was imprisoned by the biddings of her father, she wanted to please him and was scared of incurring his anger, “Even now, though she was over nineteen, she sometimes felt herself in danger of her father’s violence. She knew it was that that had given her the palpitations.” Joyce went further to establish her fears, “when they were growing up he had never gone for her, like he used to go for Harry and Ernest, because she was a girl ; but latterly he had begun to threaten her and say what he would do to her only for her dead mother’s sake. And now she has nobody to protect her”. Yet, with all her fears, when she had the opportunity of escaping, she chooses to stay back.
She tries to remember the few times he’s been nice to her and free her mind of situations that she thinks of him being irrational. Scott Trudell in his critical essay writes, confrontational with her mother’s ghost but unable to disregard the promise to fulfill her duty, ‘Keep the home together’ and inhibit Mrs. Hill’s own doomed role (including her nervous breakdown), Eveline is condemning herself to a life of Oedipal inhibition. She wants to be loved, she dreams of being treated better than her mother as Joyce writes, “but in her new home, in a distant unknown country, it would not be like that. Then she would be married-she, Eveline. People would treat her with respect then. She would not be treated as her mother had been”. Frank, whom she considers very kind is around to save her and help fulfill her dreams of better life elsewhere, knowing fully well that Dublin is not the place of her happiness. Just like Emily’s father, her father quarrels with Frank and forbids her to have a relationship with him. She decides keep her love affair a secret, probably waiting for the day of liberation.
Warren Beck writes, earlier in the evening, though she was aware that “her time was running out” Eveline had “continued to sit by the window”; now time has ran out she is at the point of embarkation physically and psychologically. It is now that “a bell clanged upon her heart” as she feels herself about to be engulfed in “all the seas of the world.” Now Frank, who she had thought, “would save her,” appears as one about to “drown her.” Beck further to clarify her thoughts that she did not mean to doubt his love, or sees him in evil light, Eveline reaches her epiphany moment. “Her eyes gave him no sign of love or farewell or recognition.” She chose to remain in Dublin, Eveline lacks true identity to be like her mother if chooses to stay or leave with Frank and have a new life. She decides to stay and keep the vows she made to her mother to “keep the home together”(6). She is truly an antihero.
Women endure a lot right from tender age, the responsibilities they are often asked to bear overwhelms them and leaves most of them emotionally and psychologically abused. Faulkner’s short story, “A Rose for Emily” and Joyce’s “Eveline” shows how women have become tragic heroes and antihero due to the roles they play in their homes and society. Their lives are destroyed by the men who are suppose to protect them, leaving them to fate.

Similar Documents

Free Essay

The Difference Between Tragic and Epic Heroes

...The difference between tragic and epic heroes Tragic heroes and Epic heroes; to the average person, they may think there is no difference. The main characteristic of a tragic hero is that he or she must have a tragic flaw, which leads to their downfall. A tragic hero, unlike an epic hero, usually does not have a successful conclusion and does not have to be neither good nor evil. While with an epic hero, he may have to deal with supernatural beings and is said to often perform unheard of, sometimes super human quest. The differences between the two can be hard to find but when you really look into the text, you can snoop out the differences. “Epic heroes somehow always get off easier than tragic heroes do.” “Epic heroes get win and at the end of the day are still thought of as noble birth and great to all humanity. In the play Beowulf, Beowulf, the main character is the exact image of an epic hero As for tragic heroes, it is the complete opposite; they come out on the bottom, with a tragic downfall that they will probably not ever get out of. Epic hero is the central figure of an epic poem whereas a tragic hero is the central figure in a tragic play.” The Circumstances of the Hero’s birth are unusual. At birth, he is said to be the son of a god. At the birth of the Hero, there is often an attempt to kill him. He may be kidnapped or sent away for his protection, foster parents often save him. Though the tragic hero is undoubtedly great, he is not perfect. Combined with his...

Words: 430 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Similarities Between Tragic Heroes

...Similarities between Tragic Heroes ​In tragedies, tragic heroes do not seem to be that much changed even though the date differs. Tragic heroes resemble each other in characteristics to lead to downfall of the hero. There are two main similarities between tragic heroes of the plays, Macbeth and Oedipus the King. In these plays, to stage a downfall of the heroes, the heroes are equipped with blindness and flaws. As to other similarities between the heroes of these two plays, Oedipus and Macbeth are both approached by a kind of seer and told of the things to pass. They both committed regicide and they both gained the throne by committing this crime even though the motive differs. ​Blindness, in other words the hero’s inability to understand his foreknown fate, is one of the main similarities between the two tragic heroes, Oedipus and Macbeth. In the case of Oedipus, blindness first shows itself in the case of regicide. In the plot, after Oedipus is told by a seer that he was going to kill his father, he tries to avoid his fate by running away but when he is confronted by a difficult situation he chooses to kill. This proves that he kills even though he knew he was going to kill his father. He is blinded to his fate although it is revealed to him. On the other hand, Macbeth’s blindness shows itself in the case of Macduff. Macbeth is foretold that he needs to beware of Macduff, he is incapable of being harmed by any man born of woman, and he will be safe until Birnam Wood comes...

Words: 630 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Vivian Barajas: What Does It Take To Be A Hero?

...Hi my name is Vivian Barajas. Have you ever asked yourself what does it take to be hero? You might be thinking a hero is Superman or Hulk, but heroes can be anywhere and can be anyone. What exactly is a hero? Well, a hero is a person with strength, courage, and bravery. Heros fight for what is right. Heroes come in many shapes and sizes. Anyone can be a Hero in their own way, and it’s true anyone can be a Hero. One example are the firemen, I know it's just a job, but why did they pick that job? Why? Because they want to make a difference. They want to help everyone. Firefighters can risk their lives just to save someone in a terrible accident. A country can also be a Hero, right now Paris is opening up to people who don't have a home...

Words: 375 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

The Crucible: John Proctor As A Tragic Hero

...What defines a man as a failure, and what describes a man as a tragic hero on par with the great greek heroes such as Oedipus? The qualities of a tragic hero, that of which people have studied for decades, have such a strict set of rules that define a tragic hero that there doesn’t seem to be any modern or “common” tragic heroes. Although Aristotle dictates that a tragic hero must be of noble birth, John Proctor demonstrates more qualities of a tragic hero than he does not, therefore John Proctor is best understood as a tragic hero. John Proctor, the protagonist in The Crucible, who was seen as a highly renowned man in his society, saw error in his ways despite his affair with Abigail. He knew what he did was far from forgivable and acknowledged himself as a sinner. Even despite the fact that he cheated on his wife, Elizabeth still saw him as a man of justice and honor and pleaded with him to end the trouble that he inadvertently started with Abigail. Elizabeth says, “Then go and tell her she’s a whore. Whatever promise she may sense--break it, John, break it,” (Miller 62). Elizabeth still knows that John is a...

Words: 939 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Antigone Creon Tragic Hero

...to the tragic hero. Typically when we hear the word hero our minds think of one who has superpowers and protects their citizens, such a Superman and Spiderman. But when it comes to the Aristotle, a tragic hero in the Greek world often refers to the character that belongs to a higher class, but yet is one who has their very own human flaws. After reading the play, many readers believe that the tragic character is in fact Antigone because she is the main character, but that is not the case. The real tragic hero that is being portrayed throughout the story is Creon. Creon posses all of the qualities that a tragic hero must have, such as his authority, high status, actions and many flaws that later on leads him into a vicious cycle. Since the death of Antigone’s parents, Creon has turned into the powerful, wealthy king. Creon holds such an authoritative role throughout the story that it allowed him to fall into the character of a tragic hero. The people were so loyal to Creon and this showed throughout the burial...

Words: 702 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Los Ninos Heroes

...Los Niño’s Heroes Courage is to have the self-fortitude to stand up for what is right. Putting your needs aside and helping for the greater cause. In order to cross a threshold one has to have self- courage along with determination and motivation, following through regardless of the results. Los Niño’s Heroes (The Heroic Children) are a piece of Mexican History that stands out. The date was September 13, 1847 six brave young men fought valiantly for their country during the Mexican-American War. Tragically, they died defending the honor of their country. The ages of these six young men ranged from 13 to 19 years of age. The Mexican-American war was in its final chapter when the Battle of Chapultepec took place. Years preceding the war, Chapultepec Castle had been utilized as Mexico’s military training academy. When the war broke out there were dozens of teenage cadets in attendance. General Nicolas Bravo who was the commander of the forces stationed at Chapultepec Hill apparently saw that the American Forces were quickly advancing and triumphing, so he ordered his men, including the cadets to retreat to safety. The six young men, however, refused to leave their post and bravely meet the superior forces of the Americans. At that point in time is where you see all six of them pass that threshold of, “I must defend my country, my country needs me!” Without a second thought they threw themselves into a battle that they did not need to fight. Never the less, they were...

Words: 465 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Mad Men Anti Heroes

...The anti-hero narrative in television has been a major success in recent years. Shows like Dexter (2006-2013), Mad Men (2007-2015), and Breaking Bad(2008-2013) all feature the anti-hero and have been critically acclaimed and loved by viewers in America. Each of these T.V. shows’ success has been measured by user reviews, user ratings, Golden Globe awards and/or nominations, and Emmy awards and/or nominations. By definition, the anti-hero is a central character in a story, movie, or drama who lacks conventional heroic attributes. (Oxford Dictionaries) How then has this hero without heroic attributes been so popular in our culture? The anti-hero has been popular in recent years because viewers can relate to him, are able to perform moral disengagement to enjoy the story, and believe that there is a chance of redemption for him. Audiences love the anti-hero because the writers have created a character that they can relate to and sympathize with. The anti-hero character creates a strong bond with the audience that lets them experience life from their point of view. They are depicted as flawed like everyone else, unlike the traditional hero, who seems more perfect. This initial bond of sympathy for the character keeps the audience interested. In Dexter, the audience can relate to the anti-hero because he appears to be a normal middle aged guy that ends up as a typical family man. When he and his first wife take the step of moving in together he experiences anxiety and doubt...

Words: 1304 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Comic Hero Compared to a Tragic Hero

...Comic hero compared to a tragic hero Craig is considered to be a comic hero compared to Hamlet and Archilles who are a tragic hero. Comic heroes is a hero who recovers from their flaws, however tragic heroes do not recover from their flaw for the reason to do in some sort of heroic sacrifice. Craig seems to have a worthless life and suffers from depression. Wanting to commit suicide to end his misery he decides not to for his family. Craig shows considerate feelings and seeks for help. The support from his friends and family helps him open up to his flaw and change his view in life. Successfully, Craig is able to recover from his flaw and live. On the contrary, Achilles lives a superior life as a demi god, and is highly admired as a warrior. Unlike Craig, Archilles only cares for himself. However Archilles too suffers from a flaw, Archilles is hubris. Archilles fights for the Greeks for his name to be remembered but knows his death will come. Unfortunately Archilles does not recover from his flaw, there was none to help him, and is the reason why he dies. Similarly to Archilles, Hamlet is a prince of Denmark. With no help he too suffers from a flaw that he is not able to recover from: indecisive. Making many failed attempts to avenge his father it accumulates the problem. Although Hamlet achieves his goal, his inability to act at the beginning causes the life of himself and other friends and family. Craig, Archilles and Hamlet are all around the same age with privileged...

Words: 306 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Oedipus Tragic Hero Essay

...A tragic hero, without an audiences' sympathy, is nothing more than a wasted character. The hero must have nobility, enough to reward him credibility with their audience. From there, he must reach a turning point from his former fortune to utter misery by the hands of his own landmark flaw. With these three combinations, he must, without exception, achieve audience sympathy; without it his lesson becomes useless, just he himself does. Though she may not fit the mold of the tragic Aristotle defined, Nora surpasses the title entirely. While still holding the three key features of nobility, harmartia, and peripetia, Nora claims victory over Oedipus as audiences willing give her their sympathy, making her the more affective tragic hero. Despite...

Words: 1256 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Macbeth Tragic Hero Essay

...In The Tragedy of Macbeth, written by William Shakespeare, there are many different aspects of tragic heroes and downfalls. Overall, the protagonist Lord Macbeth displays the greatest characteristics of a tragic hero because of his large and prominent downfall. Macbeth showed all of the tragic hero characteristics which include: goodness, superiority, tragic flaw, and self realization. These characteristics help define who Macbeth is, and who he progresses into as the play advances. The prophecies of the Witches seemed to control Lord Macbeth in the worst way. They took over his decision making and rational thinking forcing him to make dense choices which would eventually result in his downfall. Goodness; the quality of being good, in particular. Some say Lord Macbeth lost of all his morality by the greed of ambition but I very much disagree. Macbeth may have made rash decisions and chose to do wrong but he did all of which with a stable, sane, and understanding mind. “I’ll go no more. I am afraid to think of what I have done. Look on’t again I dare not.” (II ii 65-68). This shows that Lord Macbeth is aware that what he just...

Words: 442 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Classifing Okwonkwo in Things Fall Apart

...ALICE SEKYERE OBENG AUUG09120013 CLASSIFYING OKWONKWO IN “THINGS FALL APART” AND NANAYAA IN “ IN THE CHEST OF A WOMAN” AS TRAGIC HEROE AND HEROIN RESPECTIVELY, WITH REFERENCE TO THE BOOKS. In every story or novel, there is both a protagonist and antagonist ,the protagonist could either be a tragic hero, a hero, or a heroine among others .In things fall apart which was written by Chinua Achebe, a Nigerian, there is a tragic hero who is okwonkwo, the story weaves itself around him till the end and tells of how he and his people lived without the white man, when he came and after he came and also tells of how Okwonkwo forced to fight change which eventually lead to his death. With “in the chest of a woman” however, Efo Kodjo Mawugbe, a Ghanaian writer who unfortunately passed away recently tells his story in legs instead of acts and scenes which makes it unique, and also woven around Nanayaa who comes off as a strong, bold and daring character comparable to a heroine. In the play, she would stop at nothing to achieve her lifelong dream and selfish ambition of becoming a queen instead of her younger brother, and when that is not possible she resorts to disguising her daughter as a male, so she could be king. This plan backfires as the true identity is revealed at the end. Although these characteristics classify them both as a tragic hero and heroine, there are also some major characteristics that enforces that fact including that they were both noble persons, or usually of...

Words: 1368 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Is Oedipus a Hero

...World Literature I 1. In your opinion, is Oedipus a hero? Think about what you found heroic in previous characters we encountered: Gilgamesh, Enkidu, Roland. How does Oedipus compare? Also, does Oedipus have a character flaw that affects his fate? There are many types of heroes, but Oedipus happens to be a tragic hero. Throughout the story, it is pretty safe to say that Oedipus is a tragic hero. In Aristotle’s work, he has made this point very apparent. There are three main reasons why I think Oedipus is a tragic hero. First, by his own actions, he ascertains his own fate. Secondly, he falls from great esteem. Lastly, Oedipus’ story ascends fear and sympathy. The way Oedipus discovers his fate is by his own actions. If he did not inquire about the murder of Laois, he probably would have never discovered that he in fact was the murderer. The saying “curiosity killed the cat”, is a perfect example of how Oedipus’ story dwindled and unwounded. If Oedipus did not seek Teresias he would have still been in the unknown of the murder. When he asked Teresias, the answers that were given were nonetheless the answers that Oedipus was seeking. For example, Teresias replied to him and said, “You are the murderer of the king whose murderer you seek.” After hearing this information, he still does not believe it or understand, so he seeks Jocasta. He has hopes of her telling him that there is no truth to what Teresias is saying. When he arrives, the news that Oedipus hears is the...

Words: 753 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Macbeth Character Analysis

...III in Richard III, Edmund in King Lear—who are all strong enough to conquer guilt and self-doubt. Macbeth, great warrior though he is, is ill equipped for the psychic consequences of crime. Before he kills Duncan, Macbeth is plagued by worry and almost aborts the crime. It takes Lady Macbeth’s steely sense of purpose to push him into the deed. After the murder, however, her powerful personality begins to disintegrate, leaving Macbeth increasingly alone. He fluctuates between fits of fevered action, in which he plots a series of murders to secure his throne, and moments of terrible guilt (as when Banquo’s ghost appears) and absolute pessimism (after his wife’s death, when he seems to succumb to despair). These fluctuations reflect the tragic tension within Macbeth: he is at once too ambitious to allow his conscience to stop him from murdering his way to the top and too conscientious to be happy with himself as a murderer. As things fall apart for him at the end of the play, he seems almost relieved—with the English army at his gates, he can finally return to life as a...

Words: 443 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

King Lear

...The story opens in ancient Britain, where the elderly King Lear is deciding to give up his power and divide his realm amongst his three daughters, Cordelia, Regan, and Goneril. Lear's plan is to give the largest piece of his kingdom to the child who professes to love him the most, certain that his favorite daughter, Cordelia, will win the challenge. Goneril and Regan, corrupt and deceitful, lie to their father with sappy and excessive declarations of affection. Cordelia, however, refuses to engage in Lear's game, and replies simply that she loves him as a daughter should. Her lackluster retort, despite its sincerity, enrages Lear, and he disowns Cordelia completely. When Lear's dear friend, the Earl of Kent, tries to speak on Cordelia's behalf, Lear banishes him from the kingdom. Meanwhile, the King of France, present at court and overwhelmed by Cordelia's honesty and virtue, asks for her hand in marriage, despite her loss of a sizable dowry. Cordelia accepts the King of France's proposal, and reluctantly leaves Lear with her two cunning sisters. Kent, although banished by Lear, remains to try to protect the unwitting King from the evils of his two remaining children. He disguises himself and takes a job as Lear's servant. Now that Lear has turned over all his wealth and land to Regan and Goneril, their true natures surface at once. Lear and his few companions, including some knights, a fool, and the disguised Kent, go to live with Goneril, but she reveals that she plans...

Words: 1592 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Comparison Essay: King Lear and Oedipus the King

...By making the audience feel pity and sympathy for noble characters who meet their downfall, the term “tragic heroes” can come to light. Within the play King Lear by Shakespeare, King Lear himself is regarded as the one that fits the description of tragic hero. Likewise, Oedipus, from Oedipus the King written by Sophocles, is another character that can be given the title of tragic hero. Through the naïve nature of King Lear, the arrogance and pride of Oedipus, and the ignorance of both these kings, readers are overwhelmed with pity for these two characters as they descend from greatness. Both King Lear and Oedipus display similar and different characteristics, which evokes feelings of pity in the audience, as well as being regarded as tragic heroes. The naïve nature of King Lear has led to his demise and downfall. Unwanted to govern his land anymore, King Lear decides to retire, split up his kingdom into three pieces and distribute them among his three daughters. His flaw is revealed, when King Lear says “which of you shall we say doth love us most?” This naïve, old man decides that appearance is more important than reality, in which the size of the land he gives is proportional to the amount of flattery the daughter shows him. Despite Cordelia being his favourite daughter, and probably knowing just how much she loves him, he still decides to favour Regan and Goneril’s flattery. Due to this naïve quality, King Lear loses sight of what is important to him, and evokes...

Words: 782 - Pages: 4