Free Essay

Ups and Fedex Air Hubs

In:

Submitted By bubbler
Words 2289
Pages 10
UPS and FedEx Air Hubs:
Comparing Louisville and Memphis Cargo Hub Operations by Alex Cosmas and Bastien Martini
The economies of scale afforded to passenger airlines by the use of a hub-and-spoke model are also enjoyed, sometimes to an even greater extent, by cargo carriers. The world’s two largest integrated carriers, UPS and FedEx, run their central air hubs in Louisville (SDF) and Memphis (MEM), respectively. We present a case study of the air hub operations at SDF and MEM. The land-side and air-side operations are contrasted between SDF and MEM, and generalizations are drawn regarding issues prevalent to cargo versus passenger hubs.
I. Air Cargo in History
The beginning of the last century saw the dawn of flight. Since the Wright brothers’ first flight, the transfer of goods through air mail and air freight has grown tremendously. The first cargo flight ever took place between Dayton and Columbus, Ohio in November 1910, when a department store shipped a bolt of silk. Even though the shipment was of small size, the flight stayed in the records because it was achieved in less time than possible by train.
Some time elapsed before the first commercial cargo airline was created. In the 1920s passenger carriers created entities to carry freight, but it remained a very low fraction of their business. In fact, the first all-cargo airline was created after World War II, but bankruptcies and accidents in the early 1950s made most of the carriers quit the business and in 1954, only two carriers remained:
Slick Airways and Flying Tigers. Until cargo deregulation in 1977, the air cargo industry faced slow growth and remained a small percentage of air traffic.
Since 1978, the freight business has changed tremendously. One man, Fred Smith, believed that mixing passengers traffic with freight traffic was not the future because he believed route patterns for passengers and cargo were different. He created FedEx in 1973 and started earning profits by his third year. FedEx’s historic rival, United Parcel Service (UPS), was created in 1907 as a bicycle-based delivery service. In 1953, UPS expanded its business by chartering an air service named UPS Blue Label Air, and by 1988 UPS began operating its own airline.
II. Air Cargo Industry Overview
Today’s cargo industry consists of three market segments: express or “time definite” packages
(weighing less than 100 lb.), heavyweight freight shipments (packages greater than 100 lb.) and mail transport. Integrated cargo companies such as FedEx and UPS serve all three categories, but there is an abundance of carriers that provide service to only one market segment. In addition, airfreight is carried by both passenger airlines and all-cargo airlines. Passenger airlines carry freight in the belly of passenger flights, and often operate dedicated freight aircraft. All-cargo airlines are either classified as “Integrated Express Carriers” which provide door-to-door package deliveries, or
Cosmas and Martini 16.781 Term Project

December 14th, 2007
2
“Non-Integrated Freight Carriers” which offer heavyweight freight shipments through freight forwarders, etc. Scheduled and express freight constitute the largest proportion of air cargo shipments, with charter freight and mail a much smaller proportion.
Figure 1 – Air Freight Revenue Ton-Miles by Carrier Type, 1994-2002 (Source: DOT Form 41)
The air cargo industry has become a major player of the air industry since deregulation. Even though this sector has always experienced growth before deregulation, 1978 has triggered a wide range of possibilities for the industry, as seen in Figure 1. Notwithstanding the early years after deregulation when the industry got accustomed with new practice, air freight has experienced an average annual growth of nearly 8% between 1982 and 2000. Due to globalization, the FAA has forecasted this trend to continue as seen in Table 1.
Table 1 – ICAO Outlook for Air Transport to the Year 2015 and ICAO Passenger & Freight Statistics, various years 1992 – 1995 1995 – 2000 2000 – 2005 2002 – 2015
Passenger 5.2% 6.2% 4.1% 4.4%
Freight 9.9% 7.3% 3.8% 5.5%
It is also interesting to note the difference between passenger and all-cargo growth over the last 10 years. While both classes of airlines carried similar levels of freight in 1994 (expressed in tonmiles), all-cargo airlines have experienced larger growth than passenger in every year since 1994
(see Figure 2). Freight is still forecasted to experience a higher growth rate than passenger airlines over the next ten years, as seen in Table 1.
Cosmas and Martini 16.781 Term Project

December 14th, 2007
3
Figure 2 – Air Freight Revenue Ton-Miles by Carrier Type, 1994-2002 (Data Source: FAA Aerospace Forecasts, various years)
Despite its rapid growth, air freight still accounts for less than half a percent of the overall freight ton-miles transported in the U.S. Waterborne, intercity trucks and rail account for nearly 99.5% of freight tonnage shipped domestically.1 However, this data reflects the fact that ships, trains, and trucks are used to ship bulk freight and heavy packages over long distances whereas aircraft are used for relatively lightweight, rapid shipments. But according to the Organizations for Economic
Cooperation and Development (OECD), the value of air cargo accounts for more than 33% of the world trade in merchandise, while its weight is only 2% of all the cargo moved world-wide.
Figure 3 – Modal Share of Domestic Ton-Miles, 1990 and 2001 (Source: Bureau of Transportation Statistics,
National Transportation Statistics 2004)
In a world where time is of increasing value, the share of air cargo share is steadily increasing.
While it accounted for only 0.3% of the cargo market share in 1990, air cargo accounted for 0.4% in
2001 and is forecasted to grow at 5.2% per year according to BTS (see Table 2), faster than any other mode of freight shipping and an average expansion of world GDP at 3%. The world’s two largest integrated carriers stand to shoulder much of this growth, and therefore their air hub operations must be flexible enough to accommodate the increased demand.

1 Data Source: Bureau of Transportation Statistics, National Transportation Statistics 2004
Cosmas and Martini 16.781 Term Project

December 14th, 2007
4
Table 2 – Comparison of Domestic Freight Demand Forecasts (Source: historic data from BTS, National
Transportation Statistics 2003; forecasts from sources described in report text) a: Forecast for intercity truck only.
III. Door-to-Door Package Service
Every weekday UPS picks up and delivers 14.8 packages to over 80 percent of the globe. A good portion of these packages are delivered within 48 hours after pickup. Both UPS and FedEx use an advanced sort system to separate and organize volumes of packages into small, manageable piles sorted by delivery location. The typical UPS or FedEx package follows a similar process from pickup to delivery:2
1) Users take packages to a UPS Store or FedEx Kinko’s where the package is weighed and labeled. Alternatively, users can print out smart labels from ups.com and fedex.com and schedule a pickup when a delivery truck is in the area or drop the package in a local drop box. These smart labels contain tracking codes that are tracked throughout the delivery cycle, and account for over 90% of package labels that travel via FedEx and UPS.
2) At designated times, all of the accumulated packages from a given location travel, usually by truck, to a local or regional sorting facility. If packages are destined further than 200 miles, they travel by air. Otherwise they travel by truck to the local receiving sorting facility. 3) Packages that travel by air are placed into cargo containers that often weigh more than one ton. Because the sort facilities are lined with ball bearing flooring as seen in Figure 4, UPS and FedEx employees can move these containers with minimal effort. The containers allow employees to work remotely with package sorting and then move packages in bulk into the aircraft belly. The packages then head to Louisville or Memphis for further sorting.
Figure 4 – Floors are lined with ball bearings to ease the movement of cargo containers

2 Supplemented with information from “How UPS Works” at www.howstuffworks.com
Cosmas and Martini 16.781 Term Project

December 14th, 2007
5
4) At the main sorting facility, humans touch each package only twice – once to unload and once to load the package to/from the aircraft. During unload, employees scan the package labels and place them on one of three conveyors with the labels facing in any direction except down towards the belt. An array of lasers scans barcodes on all sides of package while measuring the specific dimensions of the package. Weight sensors calculate the center of gravity to better judge the number of pucks and minimum force needed to push packages from one conveyor to another:
a. Smalls: mostly letters and other documents, each of which gets its own tray on a conveyor belt
b. Mid-size packages: 6-sided boxes up to a certain weight and dimension get their own conveyor belt
c. Irregs: irregularly-shapes packages are placed on flat cars and strapped down for the sharp turns and curves around the conveyor system.
5) After approximately 15 minutes, the package travels through the UPS or FedEx hub to its intended destination pile. Similarly-destined packages are placed on cargo containers which are then placed onto aircraft which travel to another regional sorting facility.
6) When unloaded, the package is scanned yet again to tell employees which package car it should be taken to, as well as which space on a given shelf the package should be placed to optimize drivers’ time.
7) The UPS or FedEx driver uses route-planning software allows him or her to conserve time and fuel to execute the most precise delivery route. A remote delivery device is used to scan a package and receive a signature upon delivery. The whole process has taken less than 24 hours! Figure 5 – Packages are placed on specific shelves in the delivery truck to optimize drivers’ time.
Cosmas and Martini 16.781 Term Project

December 14th, 2007
6
IV. United Parcel Service and Federal Express
More than two-thirds of the U.S. air cargo market is controlled by the U.S.’ two largest cargo airlines: FedEx and UPS, with the latter controlling nearly 50% of the market alone. The international air cargo market, valued at $4.6B by Standard & Poor’s Net Advantage is more evenly segmented between U.S. cargo carriers, although FedEx, UPS and DHL have the largest individual carrier market shares, as shown in Figure 6.
Figure 6 – U.S. Carrier Market Share of Domestic (left) and International (right) Air Cargo Markets (Source:
Henry Fund Research, University of Iowa Tippie School of Management)
Because the cost of flying one ton of cargo decreases as aircraft size increases (since fixed costs are spread across greater tonnage), larger freighters are quickly replacing smaller cargo aircraft. This has resulted in a capacity increase of more than 4% per year despite a relatively constant fleet size.
This growth in aircraft size is of great importance in airport hub operations, which need to be flexible enough to accommodate larger aircraft.
United Parcel Service has its headquarters in Atlanta, Georgia and its airline hub and largest sorting facility called “Worldport” in Louisville, Kentucky. UPS is the world’s largest package delivery company and a leader in supply chain management.
Federal Express is based in Memphis, Tennessee and provides a wide range of business services in addition to its shipping operation. FedEx entered the Chinese market in the 1980’s and is therefore better poised to take advantage of China’s being the fastest growing air cargo market in the world.
Table 3 – UPS and FedEx Corporate Statistics (Source: www.fedex.com and www.ups.com)
UPS FedEx
Market
Capitalization $80.6B $33.4B
2006 Revenue $39.5B $32.3B
Daily U.S. Air
Volume (packages and documents)
2.3 million 2.0 million
Cosmas and Martini 16.781 Term Project

December 14th, 2007
7
Daily Int. Air
Volume (packages and documents)
1.8 million 1.3 million
Fleet Size 273 owned, 326 chartered 370 aircrafts + 297 small aircrafts (253
Cessna Caravan + 8 Fokker + 42 ATR)
Airports Served Domestic – 424; International – 389 Domestic – 664; International – 375
Air Hubs • United States: Louisville, Ky. (Main
US Air Hub);
Philadelphia, Pa.; Dallas, Texas;
Ontario, Calif.; Rockford, Ill.;
Columbia, S.C.; Hartford, Conn.
• Europe: Cologne/Bonn, Germany
• Asia Pacific: Taipei, Taiwan;
Pampanga, Philippines; Hong Kong;
Singapore
• Latin America and Caribbean:
Miami, Fla., USA
• Canada: Hamilton, Ontario
• United States: Memphis, Tn. (Main
US Air Hub); Indianapolis, In; Fort
Worth, Tx; Newark, N.J.; Anchorage,
Ak; Oakland, Ca.
• Europe: CDG, Paris, France
• Asia Pacific: Subic Bay, Olongapo
City, Philippines
• Latin America and Caribbean:
Miami, Fla., USA
• Canada: Toronto Pearson, Ontario
V. Prerequisites for designating an airport as a Cargo Hub
Table 4 summarizes the major differences between passenger and cargo air services, each of which contribute to differences in land-side and air-side operations between the two.
Table 4 – Comparison of Passenger and Cargo Air Services (Source: Yeong Heok Lee of Hankuk Aviation
University, South Korea)
Passenger Air Services Cargo Air Services
• Round Trip Service
• Unspecified Public Travelers
• No further Ramp Services
• Cabin Services
• Daytime departure/arrival
• Sensitive to time, routes and stops
• Airport-to-airport service
• Annual growth rate(passenger): 4.5%
• One Way Service
• Limited Shippers
• Need Ramp Services: loading/unloading, breakdown, storage, customs, etc.
• No Cabin Services
• Night departure/arrival
• Less sensitive to time, routes and stops
• Door-to-door and Intermodal service
• Annual growth rate(ton): 5.4%
Cosmas and Martini 16.781 Term Project

December 14th, 2007
8
Weather
The most important factor for designating

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

The World’s Two Largest Air Cargo Companies: Fedex and Ups

...The World’s Two Largest Air Cargo Companies: FedEx and UPS Introduction In the packaging industry there are two main competitors which are FedEx and UPS. The leader of the market is FedEx in my opinion. These companies both are using technology to try to stay ahead in the industry and to maintain a hold on the consumer base. Their consumer base includes both individuals and businesses market. The beginnings of new technologies every day as our world is continuously starting to grow smaller. The rate at which we receive and relay information and the ease at which it is accessed has increased exponentially. With this comes an increased awareness and demand by the average consumer for goods and services rendered which is to be received equally as fast. This creates an increased responsibility and burden, for the logistics supply chains and corporations to their stakeholders, to ensure that they maintain the competitive advantage needed to compete in today’s global market. FedEx and UPS begin as the United States major parcel service and has a unique challenge compared to other companies providing goods and services, but they are more than capable to handle the challenges. They both have strong backgrounds and greats services that they provide. We will discuss the history of the companies, their missions, services, geographical converges, and technology. History FedEx was formed in 1971by Fredrick Smith who started the idea of the business as an undergraduate term paper for...

Words: 2816 - Pages: 12

Premium Essay

Fedex Paper

...Battle for Value, 2004: FedEx Corp. vs. United Parcel Service, Inc. FedEx will produce superior financial returns for shareowners by providing high value-added supply chain, transportation, business, and related information services through focused operating companies competing collectively, and managed collaboratively, under the respected FedEx brand. FedEx Mission Statement (Excerpt) We serve the evolving distribution, logistics, and commerce needs of our customers worldwide, offering excellence and value in all we do. We sustain a financially strong company, with broad employee ownership, that provides a long-term competitive return to our shareowners. UPS Mission Statement (Excerpt) UPS hubs in China as of 2009: Shanghai and Shenzhen FedEx hubs in China as of 2009: Guangzhou Figure [ 1 ] - Source: http://www.travelchinaguide.com/map/ Introduction June 18, 2004 marked the start of an important international trend in logistics and carrier services. The U.S. and Chinese government came to an agreement that allowed the development of air cargo hubs and landing rights for commercial airlines in China. This pact not only opened up extensive new opportunities for the airborne market in general, but gave FedEx and United Parcel Service (UPS) exclusive cargo transportation rights (Bruner & Carr, 2010). At the time, FedEx was winning the battle for China, with its Chinese volumes nearly doubling from 2003 to 2004. Despite this, rival UPS still held the title...

Words: 6632 - Pages: 27

Premium Essay

Fedex V. Ups

...The Success of FedEx vs. United Parcel Service (UPS) Executive Summary In today’s ever advancing world, shipping services are an essential part of our everyday lives. The two largest companies’ in the shipping industry today are Federal Express Corporation (FedEx) and the United Parcel Service (UPS). FedEx is an international company that believes in quality customer service. With its consistently high quality and innovative services, FedEx has achieved a relatively high market share in the global package delivery market. FedEx is currently the global leader in the express package delivery market, and it offers delivery services in over 220 countries and territories. The biggest competition that FedEx faces today is UPS. UPS is the largest package delivery company in the world, and it offers services in over 215 countries and territories. With its consistently low priced shipping offerings, UPS has earned a reputation as the low-priced market leader. Attaining a competitive advantage in the package delivery market is a challenging task, but UPS and FedEx have found innovative ways to accomplish this objective. Although these companies essentially offer the same delivery options, each of them has carved out its own market niche within the package delivery market. Table of Contents Introduction 4 Federal Express (FedEx) 6 United Parcel Service (UPS) 6 COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS 7 United Parcel Service (UPS) 8 Threat of Substitute Product 10 Delivery Confirmation...

Words: 4617 - Pages: 19

Free Essay

Fedex

...UPS and FedEx Air Hubs: Comparing Louisville and Memphis Cargo Hub Operations by Alex Cosmas and Bastien Martini The economies of scale afforded to passenger airlines by the use of a hub-and-spoke model are also enjoyed, sometimes to an even greater extent, by cargo carriers. The world’s two largest integrated carriers, UPS and FedEx, run their central air hubs in Louisville (SDF) and Memphis (MEM), respectively. We present a case study of the air hub operations at SDF and MEM. The land-side and air-side operations are contrasted between SDF and MEM, and generalizations are drawn regarding issues prevalent to cargo versus passenger hubs. I. Air Cargo in History The beginning of the last century saw the dawn of flight. Since the Wright brothers’ first flight, the transfer of goods through air mail and air freight has grown tremendously. The first cargo flight ever took place between Dayton and Columbus, Ohio in November 1910, when a department store shipped a bolt of silk. Even though the shipment was of small size, the flight stayed in the records because it was achieved in less time than possible by train. Some time elapsed before the first commercial cargo airline was created. In the 1920s passenger carriers created entities to carry freight, but it remained a very low fraction of their business. In fact, the first all-cargo airline was created after World War II, but bankruptcies and accidents in the early 1950s made most of the carriers quit the business...

Words: 527 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Ddddds

...2011 FEDEX CORP. VERSUS UNITED PARCEL SERVICE OF AMERICA, INC.: WHO WILL DELIVER RETURNS FROM CHINA? On April 17, 2006, the International Air Cargo Association hosted its first-ever meeting in China. The location could not have been more appropriate. China was shaping up to be the world’s most significant market for air cargo, and Yan Yuanyuan, director general of China’s General Administration of Civil Aviation, had just announced that China would be opening up its air cargo market to an even greater degree. The major global cargo companies had been picking up their level of investment in China and were poised for growth: FedEx Corp. had just begun construction of a major regional hub in Guangzhou and already had over 200 Chinese cities in its international network, and United Parcel Service of America, Inc. (UPS), was just completing a new logistics hub in Shanghai and had recently begun domestic Chinese express package services. The question on the minds of many was which of these two cargo giants was going to make the most of this opportunity. Spurred in part by entry into the World Trade Organization in 2001, growth in trade with China had accelerated and the need for cargo shipment and logistics support had skyrocketed. On June 18, 2004, the United States and China reached a landmark air-transportation agreement that quintupled the number of commercial cargo flights between the two countries. The agreement also allowed for the establishment of air-cargo...

Words: 5421 - Pages: 22

Free Essay

International Express

...International Air Express Background With the development of global economics especially the U.S. economy, strong and expanding East Asian economies and the move toward closer economic integration in Western Europe.This situation offerred a good opportunity for the booming demand of international transimisiion. Therefore most of the air express companies started to pay attention to international air cargo business.According to forecasts, the market for international air express is expected to grow at approximately 18% annually from 1996 to 2016. 1995-1996 the Four Big Players In the business of international air express there are four main companies did well in this area and kept most shares of the market. They are DHL,TNT,FedEx and UPS. [pic] DHL DHL held the most shares compared with other company, with the investment of Lufthansa and Japan Airlines,the top five air freight haulers in the world,DHL got huge strengths. TNT TNT was controled by an Australian conglomerate, its shares declined from 18% in 1990 to 12% in 1995, with the competition. FedEx |Strengths |Weaknesses | |Enough funds |Lack of experience in international market | |A big fleet and landing rights by acquisition | | |Good...

Words: 596 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Strategic Management and Leadership

...TABLE OF CONTENT 1.0 Introduction 2 2.0 Measurement of Success 2 3.0 Reasons Behind FedEx Corporation’s Success 4 3.1 Excellent and Leading Service Quality 4 3.2 Effective Employee Management 4 3.3 Intended Acquisition Strategy 5 3.4 Sustained Innovation 5 3.5 Global Reach and Further Expansion 5 3.6 Pursuance of International Market Dominance 5 4.0 Justification of FedEx Corp. Success 6 4.1 Value Chain Framework 6 4.1.1 Support Activities 6 4.1.2 Primary Activities 7 4.2 VRIN Framework 7 4.2.1 Value 7 4.2.2 Rarity 8 4.2.3 Inimitability 8 4.2.4 Non – Substitutability 9 4.3 International Strategy 9 5.0 Contribution of Leadership 11 5.1 Traits Theory of Leadership 11 5.2 4E’s of Leadership 11 5.1.1 Envision 11 5.1.2 Enable 12 5.1.3 Empower 12 5.1.4 Energise 12 6.0 Challenge for Future Success 13 6.1 Intense Competition 13 Reference List 14 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 2.1: Annual Financials of FedEx Corp…….……………………………………………………………………2 Figure 2.2: FedEx Market Share…………………………………………………………………………………………….3 Figure 2.3: Air Freight & Logistics Market Growth…………………………………………………………………3 Figure 2.4: Customer Satisfaction Benchmark……………………………………………………………………….4 Figure 4.1: Porter's Value Chain Framework………………………………………………………………………….6 Figure 4.1.2: FedEx Primary Activities……………………………………………………………………………………7 1.0 Introduction According to Amsler et al (2010), the market of shipping and transport logistics has become a leading...

Words: 5186 - Pages: 21

Premium Essay

Leadership

...Airborne Express Case Q&A Info other than Case * Airborne Express is acquired by DHL in 2003 * DHL retained ownership of Airborne's ground operations and spun off its air operations as ABX Air, Inc. * Currently DHL is the number 1 delivery service company.(2nd is Fed Ex and 3rd is Blue Dart) Airborne Express Case Q&A 1. Consider the structure of the Express Mail industry in the US and how it has evolved. Why has it evolved this way? 2nd heading is about Express Mail Industry in US (in case study given) * In 1996 shipments was $16-17b Company. * Quick on-time physical delivery was coming * Use of technology was changing the game like routing * Tracking of shipment was a new service offered * Customer service was improving 2. What is Airborne’s strategy? How has it positioned itself in the industry? How is it different from FedEx or UPS? * Targeted business customer that regularly shipped large volumes of urgent items like Xerox (Position) * Never advertised much publically, instead focused on larger shipping companies * Sales force was given good freedom to negotiate volume discounts. * It positioned themselves as low price service. * They owned airports which served as its major hub to reduce the operational cost * Selective in technology selection. Wanted others to use it first. 3. How does Airborne deliver value to its customers? * High-quality, reliable service * Company offers...

Words: 2040 - Pages: 9

Free Essay

Employee Satisfaction

...FedEx Express invented express distribution and is the industry’s global leader, providing rapid, reliable, time-definite delivery to more than 220 countries and territories, connecting markets that comprise more than 90 percent of the world’s gross domestic product within one to three business days. Unmatched air route authorities and transportation infrastructure, combined with leading-edge information technologies, make FedEx Express the world’s largest express transportation company, providing fast and reliable services for more than 3.6 million shipments each business day FedEx Express invented express distribution and remains the industry’s global leader, providing rapid, reliable, time-definite delivery to more than 220 countries and territories 2010 * FedEx Express opens a new, state-of-the-art hub at the Cologne/Bonn airport; becoming the company’s new Central and Eastern European gateway and FedEx largest solar-powered hub worldwide. * FedEx Express launches an important new connection between Asia and Europe, with a direct roundtrip flight operating five days a week between Hong Kong and Paris—the first provider to offer a next-business-day service from Hong Kong to Europe. 2011 * FedEx Express acquires the logistics, distribution and express businesses of AFL Pvt. Ltd and its affiliate Unifreight India Pvt. Ltd. in India. * FedEx Express launches a new flight between India and the FedEx Asia Pacific hub at Baiyun International Airport Guangzhou...

Words: 927 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Fedex and Ups Comparative Analysis

...FOR DISCUSSION 1. FedEx entered in to China in 1984 through a joint venture, while UPS entered China in 1988 through an agent partnership relationship. Critically examine the contrasting strategies adopted by both the companies, while entering and expanding their service network in China. The case discusses in detail about the entry and expansion strategies of the two US-based logistics companies - FedEx and UPS in the Chinese market .The case examines the contrasting strategies adopted by FedEx and UPS in their efforts to establish presence in China. FedEx followed an aggressive, high risk, more investments approach to expand its services network in China which enabled the company to capture higher market share .On the contrary, till the late 1990s, UPS followed a conservative, low risk, low investment approach to establish its presence in China. The case brings out the contrasting elements of the strategies adopted by both companies including establishing the services network, advertising and promotion, targeting customers and the investments made. Finally, the case examines how the expansion strategies of both companies have changed with the improving business prospects in China, following its entry into WTO. The case discusses in detail the entry and expansion strategies of the two US-based logistics companies - FedEx and United Parcel Services (UPS) - in the Chinese market. The case examines the contrasting strategies adopted by FedEx and UPS in their efforts to establish...

Words: 3022 - Pages: 13

Premium Essay

Airborne Express Hbs Case Study

...geographies that Airborne Express, FedEx, and UPS try to serve. Are they similar or different?   | Airborne Express | Federal Express | UPS | Product Line | Air-express transportation + provides delivery service of small packages and documents | FedEx Ground delivery (No shipment)(Business documents, electronic components, medical samples and replacement parts) | Ground delivery + express delivery by air(Courier Express Services Freight Forwarding Services Logistics Services) |   |   |   |   | Target Customer Segment | Business customers that regularly ships large volume of urgent items | All Segments | All Segments (For their basic business shipping envelopes and packages, anyone around the world who wants to ship an envelope or package) |   |   |   |   | Geographies | railroads, motor freight, water transportation, air transportation | railroads, motor freight, air transportation | railroads, motor freight, air transportation |   | |   | | The upper chart demonstrates a comparison among the three largest companies- Federal Express, UPS, and Airborne Express. The physical, information, and human assets deployed to accomplish this feat varied from company to company, but the basic activities are similar in terms of products, target, and geographies. But, there are some different parts as shown in the chart. 2. Now, identify the "activity sets" along the internal value chain for Airborne Express, FedEx, and UPS. Are they consistent to...

Words: 819 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Fedex vs Ups

...THE BATTLE FOR VALUE, 2004: FedEx Corp. vs. United Parcel Service, Inc. Executive Team Summary 1. Introduction a. Main facts of the case In the context of the U.S. & China agreement of liberalization of commercial cargo flights, determine which of the two companies has created more value and is in a better position to take the advantages of the new agreement. b. Most important Characteristics of the company studied in the case i. Industry: Air Delivery & Freight Services ii. Position in its industry & Main competitors 2. Answer the Questions presented at the end of the 1st session and reviewed and answered in the second session. * How have FedEx and UPS performed financially? How do we measure its financial performance? Financial performance measures that can be obtained from a firm’s financial statements consist of absolute data and financial ratios. Absolute measures such as income, net assets and equity, reveal trends and allow a company to be compared to its performance over time, while financial ratios, including return-on-assets and current ratio, adjust for scale and allow for comparisons of different-sized companies. Financial ratios are ideal to compare FedEx and UPS, since UPS has $13.5 billion more in assets and $11 billion more in revenues than FedEx. Please see Table 2 for a comparison of the most common and widely used financial ratios. UPS is outperforming FedEx in liquidity, solvency and profitability...

Words: 1551 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Case Analysis: Airborne Express (a), Harvard Business School.

...service and freight delivery. Then Federal Express, United Postal Service (UPS) and Airborne Express, among six second-tier companies, came upon the scene. In 1973, Federal Express invented the concept of overnight express package, soon followed by the other two largest express companies–UPS and Airborne, during the 1980s. The fast growth of the Express Mail industry was mainly due to the success of the express delivery service. Thanks to Frederick Smith, a Yale undergraduate back in 1965, who had envisioned a whole different system on his economics term paper. Smith proposed an airline dedicated exclusively to express delivery of mail. Regardless of a “C” grade received on his paper, Smith incorporated Federal Express in 1971and officially began operations on April 17, 1973. Some of the features in the evolution of the Express Mail Industry includes but is not limited to the creation of the hub system and air express service. Created by Federal Express, the hub system is the symbol of the modern air courier industry. It made possible the large-scale, overnight deliveries and it has remained the standard operating method in use to this day. This system allows air courier industry to ship all freight to the company’s central hub, where it is sorted, and rerouted to its final destination. Also under consideration, the air express service played an important role in the evolution of the Express Mail Industry. FedEx is the pioneer in assembling a fleet of executive jets and modifying...

Words: 1561 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Case Solution Cola Wars

...Airborne Express Case Q&A Info other than Case * Airborne Express is acquired by DHL in 2003 * DHL retained ownership of Airborne's ground operations and spun off its air operations as ABX Air, Inc. * Currently DHL is the number 1 delivery service company.(2nd is Fed Ex and 3rd is Blue Dart) Airborne Express Case Q&A 1. Consider the structure of the Express Mail industry in the US and how it has evolved. Why has it evolved this way? 2nd heading is about Express Mail Industry in US (in case study given) * In 1996 shipments was $16-17b Company. * Quick on-time physical delivery was coming * Use of technology was changing the game like routing * Tracking of shipment was a new service offered * Customer service was improving 2. What is Airborne’s strategy? How has it positioned itself in the industry? How is it different from FedEx or UPS? * Targeted business customer that regularly shipped large volumes of urgent items like Xerox (Position) * Never advertised much publically, instead focused on larger shipping companies * Sales force was given good freedom to negotiate volume discounts. * It positioned themselves as low price service. * They owned airports which served as its major hub to reduce the operational cost * Selective in technology selection. Wanted others to use it first. 3. How does Airborne deliver value to its customers? * High-quality, reliable service * Company offers...

Words: 2040 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Strategic

...The Battle for Value, 2004 FedEx Corp. vs. UPS, Inc. FedEx was form in economic class by Fred Smith in Yale University. In 1971, Smith invested 4 million dollars of his own capital and raises an addition of 91 million dollars to launch the firm. His key innovation was a hub and spoke distribution pattern. By 2003, FedEx owned 50,000 ground vehicles, 625 aircraft, 216500 employees and shipped more than 5.4 million packages daily. The company had $15.4 billion in assets, $830 million net income, and generated $22.5 billion revenues. UPS was founded in 1907 by Jim Casey. He started a bicycle messenger called American Messenger Company and changed its name to United Parcel Service of America in 1929. The success key of UPS was efficiency. UPS was the largest package-delivery company in the world. Both ground and air parcel delivery was the primary business. Gradually, the company offered more specialized transportation and logistics service. By 2003, UPS owned 88,000 ground trucks, 583 planes and 360,000 employees. | FedEx | UPS | Ground Vehicles | 50,000 | 88,000 | Aircraft | 625 | 583 | Employees | 216,000 | 360,000 | Packages shipped/ day | 5.4 million | 13 million | Assets | $15.4 billion | $28.9 billion | Net Income | $830 million | $2.9 billion | Revenue | $22.5 billion | $33.4 billion | Problem: Market observers of the air-package delivery industry considered how FedEx and UPS would develop. Was the performance of the companies in recent years predictive...

Words: 1706 - Pages: 7