Free Essay

Ussr and Us

In: Historical Events

Submitted By inju
Words 2416
Pages 10
Chapter 38 The Bipolar World THE CHAPTER IN PERSPECTIVE No sooner had World War II reached its bloody finish than the world was thrust into an even more frightening conflagration. The United States and its allies and the Soviet Union and its allies faced off in a fundamental struggle to shape the postwar world. It was a contest based on power politics, competing social and economic systems, and differing political ideologies that lasted over fifty years and touched every corner of the globe. A spiraling arms race eventually brought the world to the brink of nuclear apocalypse. While the war remained technically cold, the fear of a nuclear disaster made it feel very different to the peoples of the world. OVERVIEW The Formation of a Bipolar World Despite the lingering general animosity and mistrust that the Soviets and Americans shared, at the heart of the cold war was a fundamental disagreement between political, economic, and social systems. Capitalism and communism, at least in the minds of the superpowers, remained mutually exclusive. The United States attacked communism and backed, at least in theory, liberalism. Consequently, the United States criticized the Soviet record on human rights and the suppression of civil and religious institutions. In turn the Soviets, led by Nikita Khrushchev, were critics of the failings of laissez‐faire capitalism and the wide gulf between rich and poor in western European and especially the United States. Further, the Soviets recognized the shortcomings of the collectivization and the brutal use of terror during the Stalinist years. In reality, both the Russians and Americans increasingly were practitioners of reformed versions of communism and capitalism. The heart of the American policy, as expressed clearly in the Truman Doctrine, was to limit the spread of communism through a policy of containment. This policy resulted in a plan to give military and financial aid to any nation facing a threat of a communist takeover—or even of the rise of a legitimate leftist party. In response the Soviets supported wars of national liberation or colonial revolution and tried to achieve military parity with the United States. In Europe these competing goals resulted in an east‐west split along, to use Churchill’s words, the “iron curtain.” The most important element in this split was the division of Germany and Berlin. By 1949 the division of Germany was final with the formation of the German Democratic Republic (East Germany) and the Federal Republic of Germany (West Germany). In 1961 the Soviets constructed the Berlin Wall in an attempt to stop the migration of over three million Germans from east to west. The cold war would have its greatest symbol. The division became more militarized with the creation of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and the Warsaw Treaty Organization. While the Soviets and Americans managed to avoid direct confrontation, they almost always found themselves on opposite ends of every international struggle. By 1948 Korea had split into communist North Korea under Kim Il Sung and anticommunist South Korea under

Syngman Rhee. An attempt by North Korea to ignore treaty agreements, cross the 38th parallel, and occupy the entire Korean peninsula brought U.S. troops into the fight. While the Americans pushed the North Koreans back, they also quickly attempted to occupy the entire Korean peninsula. Quickly, three hundred thousand Chinese troops poured across the border, and the war turned into a stalemate along the 38th parallel. Korea suffered the devastating loss of three million people, mainly Korean civilians, and lingering hostilities that left future unification almost impossible. In relation to the cold war, the Korean War signified an increasing globalization of the conflict. For all its destruction and loss of life, in the end the Korean War would almost pale in comparison to the nuclear brinkmanship of the Cuban missile crisis. Soviet aid to Castro and the remarkably clumsy failed Bay of Pigs invasion left the Cuban situation volatile at best. The October 1962 U.S. discovery of Soviet‐assembled launch sites for medium‐ range nuclear missiles in Cuba ratcheted up the pressure, and the resulting stare‐down left the world holdings its breath. In the end the Soviets backed down, but the enormity of the nuclear gamble on both sides left the world terrified. The rise of a bipolar world made for a confused political system as nations struggled to adapt to the new arrangement. In stark black and white the Soviets and Americans viewed every nation in the world as a potential ally or enemy. Some alliances, such as China’s relationship with the Soviets, were not what they appeared to the outside world. Other leaders, most notably Jawaharlal Nehru from India and Achmad Sukarno from Indonesia, organized the Bandung Conference in an attempt to create the nonalignment movement as a third option beyond Soviet or American dominance. The nonalignment option was a difficult one simply because the Americans and Soviets were always ready to intervene to back a revolution or prop up a regime. The Soviets and especially the Americans were also facing internal challenges. Senator Joseph McCarthy and his allies pursued communists inside America with such a dangerous fervor that conformity became the only option for many. Others would not be bowed so easily. Simone de Beauvoir, in The Second Sex, and Betty Friedan, in The Feminine Mystique, expressed the growing dissatisfaction of women in Europe and America. The ideas of black nationalism would reverberate through Africa and the United States. Martin Luther King Jr. fought for civil rights and Brown v. the Board of Education ruled segregation illegal. In the Soviet Union, Nikita Khrushchev’s call for de‐Stalinization often inspired more criticism than the Soviets were prepared to accept. The crushing of Hungary’s rebellion in 1956 showed clearly that there were definite limits to change in the Soviet Union. Challenges to Superpower Hegemony Both the Soviet Union and United States faced challenges to their position atop the bipolar political structure. The first challenge would come from Charles de Gaulle, who felt that France, and all of Europe for that matter, would never regain great power status if they depended on the United States for military protection. Consequently, de Gaulle pursued independent actions such as rejecting a partial nuclear test ban treaty that the Soviets and Americans had signed. His vision of a unified, independent Europe would survive after his death in the form of the European Community, which stood for the elimination of barriers to free trade. The signing of the Maastricht Treaty and creation of the European Union in 1993 carried the dream of European integration and power to a new level. Eastern Europe would provide the Soviet Union with similar but more serious challenges. In Yugoslavia Marshall Tito was expelled from the Soviet bloc for following an independent foreign policy. Nikita Khrushchev began an active

program of de‐Stalinization that led to the release of millions of political prisoners. The air of openness also led to more criticism of the traditional Soviet system than the Russians were prepared to accept. Soviet tanks rolled into Hungary in 1956, to topple Imre Nagy and install János Kádár, and Czechoslovakia in 1968, to bring an end to Alexander Dubcek’s Prague Spring. Leonid Brezhnev’s Doctrine of Limited Sovereignty, also known as the Brezhnev Doctrine, clearly displayed the limits of reform. Relations with China weren’t going any better for the Soviets and grew much more troubled after Meo Zedong was forced to sign the one‐sided treaty of Friendship, Alliance, and Mutual Assistance. By the mid‐1960s the Chinese were accusing the Soviets of being “revisionists” for not more actively challenging the Americans. Instead, the Soviets were practicing detenté with the Americans and agreed to the Strategic Arts Limitations Talks. American‐Soviet relations took a turn for the worse in 1979 when the Unites States established full diplomatic relations with China. The beginning of the end of the bipolar world was obvious after the American defeat in Vietnam and the Soviet debacle in Afghanistan. The End of the Cold War Communism, because it had been imposed from the outside by the Soviet Union, never truly came to grips with nationalism in eastern Europe. Any good will that the Soviets had accrued from their valiant fight against the Nazis was wasted on totalitarian regimes and blatant acts of militaristic oppression in Hungary in 1956 and Czechoslovakia in 1968. By the time of Mikhail Gorbachev’s arrival and the corresponding death of the Brezhnev Doctrine, eastern Europe was a time bomb waiting to explode. Beginning with Poland and the efforts of the Solidarity leader Lech Wallesa, the eastern European states destroyed decades of communist rule and cut ties with the Soviet Union. Bulgaria (including the longest‐lasting communist dictator, Todor Zhivkov) and Hungary followed suit. A “velvet revolution” swept the communists out of power in Czechoslovakia (followed by the “velvet divorce” that resulted in the split into the Czech Republic and Slovakia). Nicolae Ceauşescu’s brutal regime in Romania came to an end in 1989 with his overthrow and death. East Germany’s Erich Honecker, personifying a system that had lost touch with the people and with reality, denounced Gorbachev’s reforms and was astonished when he was swept out of power. On 9 November 1989 the Berlin Wall, the greatest symbol of the cold war, was breached for good. It is impossible to comprehend the events in Eastern Europe without understanding the career and philosophy of Mikhail Gorbachev. Like most revolutionary figures, Gorbachev did not initially intend to abolish the existing political and economic system of the Soviet Union. His calls for uskorenie (“acceleration”) went nowhere, and he realized that the Soviet system was so firmly entrenched that any subtle changes would move at glacial speed without a radical kick start. Gorbachev’s policies of perestroika (“restructuring”) and glasnost (“openness”) shook the Soviet Union and the Soviet bloc to its core. Unfortunately, as is also so often the case, reformers can lose control of the revolution and it can spin out of control—and inspire drastic actions to protect the status quo by military officers or conservative officials. The problem that Gorbachev faced was that because the Soviet Union was only half Russian, there was the very real potential for ethnic and political meltdown. When the Baltic States and then the rest of the Soviet republics declared independence, a conservative coup imprisoned Gorbachev. Boris Yeltsin, the popular leader of the Russian Soviet Federated Socialist Republic, defeated the coup and saved Gorbachev but also essentially ended his tenure in office. It would be left for Yeltsin to dismantle the Russian communist party and move toward market reforms. The bipolar cold war world

collapsed overnight, and millions around the globe enjoyed a breathtaking (and terrifying) taste of freedom. Two superpowers emerged from the ashes of the Second World War, the United States and the Soviet Union. Former allies, the two were now actively hostile, but they repeatedly stopped short of a full‐out war. The prospect of a nuclear confrontation was too awful to contemplate. The cold war was characterized by the following: • The arms race. The logic of the cold war drove both superpowers to stockpile nuclear weapons in order to match one anotherʹs destructive capabilities. The two powers were evenly matched in the 1960s, but by the 1980s the effort had severely strained the Soviet economy. Bipolar alliances. The cold war saw new defensive alliances, NATO in the west and the Warsaw Pact of the Soviet satellites. The world was divided into two camps, and the ʺthird worldʺ nations were courted and pressured to join one or the other. Some states, such as France and Yugoslavia, demonstrated that it was possible to avoid such entanglements. The Peopleʹs Republic of China turned briefly to the Soviet Union for support, but broke free after 1964. Aggressive saber‐rattling. Although the superpowers avoided direct and full‐scale war, a number of minor conflicts sapped their energies and resources: Berlin, Korea, Hungary, Cuba, and Czechoslovakia. The United States fought a long and ultimately futile war in Vietnam. The Soviet Union was likewise drawn into a civil war in Afghanistan. Both these campaigns failed. The failure of communism. As an economic system, Soviet communism provided a shabby equality for all, with few consumer goods and limited opportunities. In contrast, the postwar decades saw unprecedented prosperity in the United States, Europe, and Japan. Overall the standard of living in the capitalist societies improved dramatically, although there were greater extremes of wealth and poverty. The collapse of the Soviet Union. The breakdown of the Soviet Union, while a long time coming, was swift and unexpected when it came. Between 1989 and 1991, the Soviet Empire completely unraveled, and the cold war ended.









Please answer these for the day of the test: five points each 1. Nikita Khrushchev predicted that eventually people “will give their preference to the truly free world of communism and turn their back on the so‐called `free world’ of capitalism.” What was his definition of “free”? Could it be argued that in the cold war the Americans and Soviets ensured that no one was truly free? 2. Discuss the origins of the cold war. What were the fundamental differences between the Soviet Union and the United States? Examine the contrasting ideologies of the superpowers. 3. Examine the political and social philosophy of Mikhail Gorbachev. How did he try to bring about changes in the Soviet Union? Did he go too far and too fast? Why do you think he doesn’t get the credit he deserves?

4. Examine the situations in Korea and Cuba in relation to the cold war competition between the Soviet Union and the United States. Who, if anyone, was victorious in these confrontations? Compare and contrast the American experiences in Vietnam to that of the Soviet Union in Afghanistan. What was the lesson each superpower learned? Examine the role played by Eastern Europe in the cold war and the collapse of the Soviet Union. How did the division and occupation of Germany represent the conflicting goals of the Soviet Union and United States in the cold war? What was the significance of the Berlin Wall? Examine the nonalignment movement of Jawaharlal Nehru and Achmad Sukarno. What were their goals? Were other leaders trying to chart a new path in the bipolar world of the cold war? What role did the fear of nuclear annihilation play in the cold war? Did the threat of the atomic bomb, strangely enough, keep the cold war cold?

5. 6. 7.

8.

9.

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Trace and Explain the Relationship Between the Us and Ussr During the Cold War

...the USA and the USSR during the Cold War period. The Cold War referred to the hostility the US the USSR, in the post-WWII period, but no ‘hot’ war was ever fought between the two superpowers directly. From 1947-1991, the relationship of the US and the USSR can be periodized into four stages. When it was very tense – during early years and following Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, there were conflicts and confrontation. However, when it was not so tense – during détente and in its twilight years, there was communication and cooperation. During the period 1947-1962, the relationship between the US and the USSR was poor and there was much tension between them. The two superpowers treated the other as a threat and an enemy too. As a result, they challenged or competed with each other in different aspects. In 1947, the US announced the Marshall Plan, to help Europe recover from the war, believing that poverty provided a hotbed for communism and that a prosperous Europe was crucial to check the spread of communism in Europe. The USSR condemned it as dollar imperialism and prohibited the Eastern European countries to take part in it. Most crucially, to counteract the Marshall Plan, the USSR provided the Molotov Plan to aid the countries of Eastern Europe. In short, both the US and the USSR were competing with each other by providing economic aid to strengthen the ties within the capitalist bloc and the communist bloc respectively. In 1949, the US set up the North...

Words: 1237 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

‘a Characteristic of the Cold War (1946 – 91) Was Us Response to Ussr Challenges Rather Than Ussr Response to Us Challenges.’ Do You Agree? Justify Your View.

...1. With reference to the arms challenge by USSR, US responded by developing new military weapons and building more armaments. • After the Second World War, Stalin was determined to make his country into a super power with nuclear capacity to compete with US. In 1949, the USSR exploded her first atomic bomb and became a nuclear power. In 1957, the USSR developed Inter-Continental Ballistic Missiles (ICBM) which could be fired from thousands miles away. • In response to the arms challenges by USSR, US responded by developing more advanced weapons than USSR and building a huge amount of them e.g. after USSR exploded the atomic bomb, US made the first hydrogen bomb. Also, after the USSR developed (ICBM) in 1957, US developed more ICBMS and warheads during 1958 -61. • To conclude, it was USSR started the arm race and this made US response by building more armaments. 2. With reference to the spread of communism in the Eastern Europe by USSR, US responded by adopting the policy of containment. • A civil war between the Greek government and the communist rebels broke out in Greece in 1946. The Soviet Satellites soon came to the aid of the rebels. Also, when Britain withdrew her troop from Greece, it left a power vacuum in the eastern Mediterranean and made Stalin turn his eye to Turkey. He even demanded a base in Dardanelles. • In response to the spread of communism the eastern Europe, the US government gave up her traditional isolation policy and made a firm stand to check...

Words: 784 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

To What Extent Did Peaceful Coexistence Ease Cold War Tension Between Us and Ussr 1953- 1961?

...To what extent did peaceful coexistence ease cold war tension between US and USSR 1953- 1961? Between the years 1953-1961 the Soviet Union under the control of Nikita Khrushchev adopted a rather ‘friendly’ and calm approach regarding American-Soviet relations. Following the death of Stalin, Khrushchev adopted the policy of ‘peaceful coexistence’ that sought a friendly approach to the west limiting the threat of direct confrontation. Through the use of this foreign policy Khrushchev could build up the soviet nation directing resources in order to better the Soviet Union’s national situation. This new policy eased cold war tensions as it saw an age of negotiating and the end of a fierce opposing ideological battle upon the surface, yet it is clear that beneath a rather more sinister situation was occurring that would create the most dangerous period in the cold war; ‘the threat of total annihilation’ so therefore it is not fair to say that peaceful coexistence was close to being reached during this period even though the attitude of the Soviet Union had changed. Although it may seem that peaceful coexistence eased cold war tensions as a friendly approach however, it is clear that the change of attitude to a peaceful approach only created further suspicion and the need for security. The threat of total annihilation and the development of a nuclear race created an increasingly tense and dangerous situation. After the development of the atom bomb and hydrogen bomb on both sides both...

Words: 1227 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Democracy vs. Communism Following Wwii

...political ideologies. Democracy was supported by the West against communism which was supported by Russia and Eastern Europe. To determine the better of the two systems, the US and the USSR engaged in a 30 year, largely non-violent war to be the best. The winner would be the country to decide the political ideologies of the countries freed during World War II as well as throughout the rest of the world. The USSR emerged from World War II as a world power, and through the next three decades engaged in a battle with the Western World to spread communism, forcing eight Eastern European nations as well as other Asian and Middle-Eastern countries to remain communist until the end of the century. World War II left the USSR as a world power but in a state of complete disarray, leaving the USSR to rebuild and expand their own government beliefs. During the war, the USSR faced the most civilian and military casualties out of any other nation by far. Through the course of the war, 19 million soldiers were killed, with over 5 million civilian casualties, resulting in a total loss over almost 13% of the USSR's population. An additional 5 million prisoners of war, political enemies, and people that had committed crime were in forced labor camps. They were forced to harvest natural resources such as coal and iron the USSR could not afford to buy. Also left over from World War II was the collectivization and nationalization of businesses and farms. Years before the war, Stalin had collectivized...

Words: 1775 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Second World War

...CREATING WAR ON TWO FRONTS 3.THE U.S, SUPPLY FOR THE USSR 4.THE USSR ITSELF 5.THE AXIS MISTAKES 6. CONCLUSION Allied forces consistent from countries which opposed the Axis powers. The main policy makers of Allies were the U.S.A., USSR and British Empire. These coalition and its cooperation helped the USSR, but importance of allied support for the USSR victory is arguable as there are several factors which oppose that statement. Allied forces were crucial for the USSR victory in the 2 World War as they created war on two fronts, which did not allow German to use all its power against the USSR. After defeat of Germans in Moscow, the USSR army advanced on the east, defatting Germans in Stalingrad, Leningrad and Kursk. However, even when Eastern was the biggest front in the 2 World War, and the USSR was fighting against bigger proportion of German soldiers, allies created pressure on Nazi army from the West and in North Africa. If the USSR would have fought against the hole Reich Army, the war for it would be lost. Also the allies were highly advanced in technology, what resulted in a lot of bombing operation from the USA and Britain. This allowed the USSR to meet less german tanks and avoid German airfares in their full presence, as the USSR was not able to produce aircrafts or tanks which would be affective against Germans. Allied forces created more difficulties for German army on the western front, helping the USSR to win weakened Germans on the East, and in result...

Words: 2251 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Collapse of the Ussr

...Why factor that cause the collapse of the USSR? On Christmas Day on 1991,Mikhail Gorbachev resigned as the president of USSR and announced that USSR from then on was not going to existed anymore. Except the US president Reagan, very few people predict the collapse would happened. Evidences prove that the break-up of the USSR was intended and also out of Gorbachev’s expectations. After Brezhnev died. There were lots of problems left to Gorbachev. There were mainly two problems: Economy crippling and severe relationship with the US and eastern European countries.Gorbachev actually had a specific goal to improve USSR’s development by using Perestroika and Glasnost.However, those two police actually accelerated the coming of the fall. with an unintended consequences.However,there are also historian argues conversely that actually it is an intended result that the long-term economics crippling and stagnation caused the financial sustainability of USSR which directly influence people’s life situation and the USSR development. One of the Gorbachev’s policy Perestroika which was reconstruction on economy was one of the factor leads to fall of USSR which wasn't seen as a stimulant of the collapse by Gorbachev. By that time USSR saw its economic crippling. Gorbachev set up goals for ending the economic stagnation and improving the economy in USSR.Perestroika allowed more independent actions from various ministries and introduced market autonomy reforms.The goal of the...

Words: 1039 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Revision Cold War

...The ‘Thaw’ & ‘Peaceful Co-existence’ 4. The arms impact of the arms race 5. Sin-Soviet relations 6. Détente 7. End of Cold War Reminder of the structure of Unit 3 • Unit 3 = 25% of total marks • Written exam: 2 hours • Answer ONE question from Section A (30 marks), and ONE from Section B (40 marks) - choice of 2 questions in both sections • Section A – discuss an historical issue • Section B – use source material & knowledge to discuss an historical event Section A – themes to explore in your revision: 1. The post-Stalin thaw and the bid for peaceful coexistence in 1950s: a) USSR: Khrushchev b) USA: the responses of Dulles, Eisenhower and Kennedy. • the continuation of the Cold War in the 1950s following the retirement of Truman & death of Stalin, despite the bid for improved relations on the part of the USSR in the form of unilateral cuts in the size of the Red Army and withdrawal from Austria and Finland. • the concept of peaceful coexistence & what motivated Khrushchev & the Soviet leadership, & why the USA under Eisenhower & his Secretary of State, Dulles, and later Kennedy and his staff, responded in the way they did. • the role of personality, particularly that of Khrushchev, in shaping relations in these years should be addressed & students should be aware of the Paris Summit, the U2...

Words: 13995 - Pages: 56

Premium Essay

How Far Was the Ussr Responsible for the Outbreak of the Cold War 1945-1949?

...How far was the USSR responsible for the outbreak of the Cold War 1945-1949? To a certain extent, the USSR’s responsibility of the Cold War cannot be underestimated as their policies following the Second World War may have been seen as aggressive by USA. The forceful take-over of Eastern Europe through the Red Army occupations, especially in distinctive cases such as Poland and Czechoslovakia, can be seen as being far from the “liberation” over which the two war-time allies had agreed, while the rigging of elections did not conform to the Yalta agreement of the organisation of free ones. Stalin responded to the Americans’ policies of containment by creating his own agencies, therefore creating even more hostility between the two superpowers, while also refusing the existence of anything but Soviet puppet states in Eastern Europe. However, the event which cemented the outbreak of the Cold War was Stalin imposing the Berlin Blockade, taking direct action towards weakening the Americans’ position. One may see that Stalin’s blockade resulted in the official creation of two separate German states, one of the most significant events of the Cold War. On the other hand, revisionists point out that the USSR was taking defensive measures to protect itself from anything that could have caused as much damage as the Second World War, while the Americans, who were superior economically, adopted provocative policies. They challenged the patience of the Russians by hiding crucial events from...

Words: 4209 - Pages: 17

Premium Essay

Detente

...was used as an easing of the strained relations btwn the US and the Union of Soviets Socialists Republic, from 1969 until D fell in 1980. D was an alternative to the previous US policies of containment and rollback, and the USSR’s policies of Stalinisation and peaceful coexistence, set out to open a window of opportunity in the attempt to reduce International tensions. The supporters of D believed it was a policy beneficial to both sides of the CW ensuring world peace, whereas detractors believe D only showed weakness of the US, allowing the USSR to continue with the CW and increase its influence over different parts of the world. In order to evaluate whether D was effective it must be closely observed.The period of 1956-62 saw a series of events which continued to raise greater anxiety between the USA and the USSR. The Hungarian Revolution 1956 and the Berlin Crisis 1961 were two events which triggered the rising anxiety and tension which was felt between many countries. However, it was the Cuban Missile Crisis of 1962, reaching only seconds to midnight on the Doomsday Clock, which highlighted the danger of superpower confrontation and the possible result of nuclear war. US President Kennedy’s threat to use nuclear missiles against the Soviet Union if their bases in Cuba were not withdrawn caused fear across the world. The development of the nuclear arms race saw in 69 the USSR had matched the nuclear capability of the US for Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD). The SU overcame...

Words: 2496 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

The Arms Race

...The Arms Race Arsenal A-Bomb (US 1945, USSR 1949) H-Bomb (US 1952, USSR 1953) ICBM (US 1957, USSR 1958) 1957 : USSR launch first satellite “Sputnik”into space. “Missile Gap” paranoia in USA ABM (Anti-Ballistic Missiles intercept & destroy nukes in theory)(USSR 1968, USA 1972) MIRV (USA 1970, USSR 1975) -Stockpiling of nuclear weapons seen as necessary by both parties -Technological advances made both USA & USSR feel vulnerable -Secrecy, need to catch up or to be one step ahead = fuelled arms race -This (building increasingly powerful & sophisticated weapons) continued until 1980s Key Ideas : Nuclear weapons have crucial impact on US foreign policy during Cold War : -gave rise to arms race (essential feature of CW, maintains CW hostility) -revolutionized military strategy -imposed great economic strain (hence end of CW? Debatable) Brodie (1946) “The Absolute Weapon” Main idea : before nukes the purpose of military = win wars after nukes the purpose of military = avoid wars Military victory in total war impossible for either side US Presidents develop different strategies on what to do with their nuclear arsenal Eisenhower & “Massive Retaliation” = the US will use every weapon if attacked, despite the consequences = the threat of an all-out nuclear war used to make sure it wouldn’t happen ? Kennedy & “Flexible Response” =exploring wider options beyond military forces Sec of State McNamara’s belief in possibility of limited, controlled and rational (...

Words: 654 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

A2 Cold War, Unit 3

...Economics: Marshall Plan (1947) – provision of fuel, raw materials, goods, loans, food, ……………..machinery advisers US exploited it financial power to export Western values – dollar imperialism 1948-52, US Congress voted nearly $13bn economic aid to Europe Trade war with Communist countries, e.g. Cuba Military tensions: Korean War (1950-3), Vietnam (early 1960s -1973); US …………military …………..build-up, e.g. 1960 2.4 US military personnel around world; …………1959, 1,500 ………….military bases in 31 countries Treaties: NATO (1949) – North Atlantic Treaty Organisation SEATO (1954)– South East Asia Treaty Organisation Warsaw Pact (1955)– military defensive pact amongst eastern European nations COMECON (1949)– Council for Mutual Economic Assistance Propaganda: European Recovery Program – propaganda as much as economic ………..exercise Benefits of Marshall Plan advertised Italy became a focus of economic rebuilding after WWII - ‘Operation Bambi’ used minstrels, puppet shows and film Espionage: CIA (1947) – founded to co-ordinate information gathering on ………USSR and ………..Allies. Activities included: Support for anti-Communist political leaders, e.g. Christian Democrats, 1948 elections ‘Regime change’, e.g. overthrow of left-wing govt in Iran & Guatemala, Operation Executive Action (1961), collaborated with Mafia to overthrow Fidel Castro Arms race: 1945 US tested and detonated 1st atomic...

Words: 1286 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Do You Agree with the View That the Sino-Soviet Split Was Caused Primarily by the Political Rivalry of Khrushchev and Mao?

...security was the basis of much strain as neither country felt safe mainly due to the advancement of nuclear weapons. Both countries had many attempts in order to gain stability ahead of the other such as the Korean War, where the USSR forced Mao to pay a large sum of money in order to pay back the USSR for its aid. However, this caused further rifts in the relationship. Due to the shared border of China and the USSR, territorial disputes were not unheard of however, throughout the Cold War, this became a larger issue as each wanted to assert more power. Although relations with the US was a factor involved in the split, it did little but cause tension and demonstrate the further rift that was happening between the two countries through the various meetings with presidents. Ideological differences were pivotal in the breakdown of Sino-Soviet relations as they marked a significant flaw in the relationship; this was mainly due to their idea of the Nature of a Revolution. The Soviets believed in a Worker’s revolution whereas Mao was set on a peasant revolution, which can be seen through his attempt at the Cultural Revolution in 1966 in which he demonstrated a Breakdown of the Soviet Bureaucratic system and it created anarchy. Prior to this, Mao was accused by the USSR of ideological errors in the “Great leap forward”. A geopolitical view of the split is that both based their...

Words: 1709 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Some Causes for Collapse of Communism

...Which did more to cause the collapse of the Soviet Communism by 1991, developments inside or outside the USSR? 1991 marks the end of Soviet Communism. Leading to 1991, USSR started to lose support from the Eastern European as USSR was in a situation that provided them with undesirable economic situations, low living standards, political instability and lack of freedom. As a whole, the cause for these situations, thereby leading to the fall of Soviet Communism, can be categorized in two main reasons – developments inside of USSR, and developments outside the USSR. While the external developments such as role of Ronald Reagan & his policies, the Pope’s involvement, rise of non communist movements in Eastern Europe and price of oil and effects on USSR did played a significant role in breaking the Soviet Communism, it is still undeniable that the internal developments, mainly the USSR leaders’ (Brezhnev and Gorbachev) policies, made larger and more tangible impacts that raises the resentment and opposition to Soviet domination, causing it to fall apart. The developments inside the USSR therefore did more to cause the collapse of the Soviet Communism. To begin with, one of the early causes of the fall of communism is due to the stagnation period under Brezhnev where economy did not improve, or rather, declined (which can be seen from USSR’s continuous importing of grain from US). This stagnation was due to expanded military and neglected domestic economy. As a whole, this period...

Words: 1718 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

U.S, Foreign Policy

...Cold War Foreign Policy Foreign policy is how one sovereign state deals with another sovereign state and will dictate how a country will act with respect to other countries politically, socially, economically and militarily. Foreign policy is not a new idea, the act of foreign policy has been around for thousands of years when neighboring tribes and civilizations would co-exist without war. Today foreign policy is more complicated than just not going to war with near by villages. Today it is handled by foreign ministers, ambassadors and secretary of state. The United States is perhaps the youngest and most powerful nation today and through its short span of being a great civilization it has gone through many ideals of how to utilize its foreign policy, but what was the process that helped shaped United States foreign policy? How did other countries establish their foreign policy and what were the goals and outcomes? Ever since the United States became a country its foreign policy was to remain neutral to world conflicts and was largely based off of the idea of isolationism, but in December 1941 the United States was bombed by Japan and entered the war as a full fledged member of the allies. Unlike in world war 1 when the united states played a minor role in the war and only claiming to be an associate of the allied forces. During World War 2 the United States played large roles with fighting fronts on both the Atlantic sides and the Pacific sides of the war. After the end...

Words: 1508 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

History

...Unit 1: The Seeds of Conflict, 1917-1944 The differences between capitalism and communism Capitalism advocated private enterprise, land owned by individuals with minimum government interference. Liberal democracy was a political system where each person has freedom to vote, to elect, of speech and of worship. Communism advocated state-owned property, an economy where all industries and agriculture were owned by the government on behalf of the people. A one-party state was a political system with one political party to represent the people. In the USSR, all political parties other than the Communist Party were banned and elections were contested between individuals of this party. The tensions that existed between the USSR and the USA in the 1920s and 30s Communism was viewed as an unstable force that threatened social and political order and Lenin, leader of the Bolshevik Revolution, was to represent this. Allied countries Britain, France, USA and Japan had sent help to Bolshevik enemies during the Civil War therefore there were some hostile feelings towards them even after the war. The Treaty of Brest-Litovsk (March 1918) was a result of Russia withdrawing from the war, leading to a feeling of betrayal amongst the allies who were left to fight Germany alone. Communist groups in Spain and France grew in strength in the 1930s in response to the hardships of the Great Depression which placed strains on the USA. Britain’s appeasement policy towards Germany under Hitler’s...

Words: 7667 - Pages: 31