Premium Essay

Was Russia a Backward Power?

In:

Submitted By lolaquintero
Words 856
Pages 4
Was Russia a Backward power?

In the end of the 19th century, Russia was part of Europe´s five Great Powers, along with Britain, France, Germany and Austria-Hungary. It was a huge state that dominated Eastern Europe and had an important role in European International relations. Although it seemed as Russia was a prosperous country, many historians state that it was a backward power at this period of time, as the Tsarist state had many weaknesses, such as political problems, social debilities or economic difficulties.

To begin with, there was autocracy, which meant that one person, the Tsar, governed the whole state. He was regarded as the absolute ruler, by divine right.
There were three official bodies, which helped rule the Tsar: The Imperial council, The Cabinet of Ministers and The senate. Even though this might seem as advancement, all three bodies were chosen by the tsar, and unless the tsar approved it before, they were unable to take any action. This autocracy showed how Russia was politically behind compared to other European nations, as all major western-European countries had some sort of democratic aspects in their government.
An important fact in Russian politics at this time was that the few Russian tsars who had been reformers, modernised Russia in some ways, but did nothing about politics, as all of them believed in the convenience of autocracy. Some clear examples of Russia´s political backwardness were: It had no parliament, political parties had no right to exist, it was a criminal offence to oppose to the Tsar and Government censorship was imposed on public books and journals.
Anyone who had liberal ideas was not able to express them and would usually go underground. This lead to secret agents of the Okhrana infiltrating these groups, resulting in frequent raids, arrests, imprisonment and general harassment.

Another factor that

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Economic Development: a Comparison of Rostow and Gerschenkron

...“Rostow’s pattern of thought of economic development is often compared and contrasted with that of Alexander Gerschenkron, though the two are more or less compatible and complementary.” Critically discuss this statement. The theory of economic development throughout history has been of significant discussion especially in regard to the works of Rostow and Gerschenkron. The differentiation between the pattern of thoughts and ideals is a hotly debated topic within economics. The ideals the two theorists create, each substantially creditable in their own right, entail degrees of correlation and variation. Leaving the conclusion, do the to patterns of economic thought complement one another or is there distinct disparity between the two. Applied examples will be used below to analyse the extent of segregation or association between the works of Rostow and Gerschenkron. The two theories of work are mainly discussed with Asian development as it is more relevant, timely and there is significantly more information available than previous developed countries such as Great Britain. Walt Whitman Rostow developed one of the major historical models of economic growth in 1960, The Stages of Economic Growth: A non-communist manifesto. This piece portrays the process of economic development in a previously unseen approach, evidently forging it as a milestone in economic literature. Rostow's Stages of Growth model, The five stages are (1) the traditional society, (2) the preconditions...

Words: 2883 - Pages: 12

Premium Essay

Doc Analysis

...1928 Prepared by: Yulia Kirillova ID: 10095380 The Soviet Union was founded in 1922, when the Bolsheviks seized power in Russia. After the death of its first leader, Vladimir Lenin, there was a power struggle from which Joseph Stalin emerged as winner for the control of the Communist party. By the day of Lenin’s death there were five candidates with the potential to emerge as the new leader of the U.S.S.R: Stalin, Trotsky, Bukharin, Zinoviev, and Kamenev; Bukharin belonged to the “Rightists” and wished to continue Lenin’s economic policy, which gave more economic freedom for the peasants and promoted agriculture, Zinoviev and Kamenev wanted state control of economic life, Trotsky believed in the importance of a worldwide communist revolution, and Stalin filled the room for interpretation in Marxist though with the concept that he called “socialism in one country”. That was a significant shift from the previously held Marxist position that socialism must be established globally, and was in sharp opposition to Leon Trotsky’s theory of permanent revolution. In contrast to what Trotsky thought and envisioned for Russia, Stalin believed that the success of Marxism in Russia was dependent on the construction of a successful soviet union, rather than a multitude of communist revolutions throughout the world.  One step towards building a successful Soviet Union, as Stalin saw it, was the introduction of the five-year plans, which began the rapid process of transforming...

Words: 1196 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Miss

...Essay – Reasons for the 1905 revolution in Russia In this essay I will assess the reasons I think are to blame for the 1905 revolution in Russia. I will look into; the Russo-Japanese war and how it was disastrous for Russia, Russification and the oppression of minorities, Pogrom (Jews) and how they were treated in 1905 Russia, Bloody Sunday and why it bought peoples opinion of the Tsar to an all time low, the living and working conditions for the people of Russia at the time, the Potemkin Mutiny and its rebellious crew and Russia being so backward compared to many other European countries. Firstly, the Russo-Japanese war was a huge factor on the 1905 revolution, this is because Russia went into the war expecting for it to be easy win they believed Japan was an inferior nation, much smaller in size and only holding a fraction of population that Russia had. It was close and easy to attack, being right next to Russia did not have to travel far to battle. Russia also thought the Japanese army wasn’t very well equip therefore they would not be able to fight back with any force. Russia went into war with Japan to obtain an ice free port for better trade, to expand its empire and show the Far East it had power but mostly to distract attention from the domestic troubles it was currently facing. Russia believed winning this war would bring composure to a country facing problems. The war did not go the way Russia had planned it to; they were eaten for breakfast by the Japanese. I think...

Words: 512 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

To What Extent Was the Tsarist Economy Transformed Between 1881 – 1905?

...To what extent was the Tsarist economy transformed between 1881 – 1905? The torpor of the Russian economy compared to other European Great Powers was a prominent predicament to both Alexander III and Nicholas II. In order to sustain Russia’s Great Power status, both Tsars engaged in a policy of economic renewal between the years 1881 and 1095. Despite success in managing to proliferate economic growth rates, the attempts of economic reform between 1881 and 1905 weren’t sufficient in order to make Russia’s economy strong enough to fully maintain Russia’s ‘Great Power’ status as Russia still lagged behind the other Great Powers come 1905. (92) The main quandary facing the Russian economy was its lack of industrial capacity and both Alexander III and Nicholas II endeavoured to invigorate Russia’s industrial competence through a policy of State Capitalism. Witte played a main role in attempting to overcome this vast hindrance. One of Witte’s main policies was to acquire capital to invest in the industry of which he executed through foreign loans and heavy taxes; through this Witte succeeded in creating the centrepiece of his system – the Trans-Siberian railway. This in turn would provide the communication system essential to exploit the economic potential of Russia by allowing the export of raw materials. Witte also had economic success with raw materials. Coal and oil increased by 150% and iron by 200%. With the accomplishment of the railway and the increase in raw materials...

Words: 765 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Russia

...height of its power and influence in the nineteenth century, and seemed set to dominate Europe after the defeat of Napoleon at Waterloo in 1815. However this threat came to nothing. Despite the efforts of successive Tsars, the country remained backward and bureaucratic. When change at last occurred, it was through the work of the revolutionaries during the 1917 Revolution. Imperial Russia following the Decembrist Revolt of 1825 , the entire Russia population was plagued with fear, trapped in a country dominated by ruthless totalitarian leaders. and served as an effective way to ultimately control the entire population. Due to many of the despotic policies imposed upon Russian citizens, widespread discontent arose and revolutionary groups began to form. Although terrorism remained relatively quiet during most of the 19th century, tension began to build and by the early 20th century revolutionary movements were in full force, as a “new type of terrorist emerged”(cite). Russia from 1825 until the mid-20th century was, for the most part, a totalitarian state, dominated by tyrannical ruler who used methods of terror to achieve and later consolidate their power. A common strategy used throughout this century in suppressing opposition was the exploitation of a certain group, dubbing all members “enemies of the people.” Russia also experienced a century of economic instability as a result of the implementation of different reforms that at times succeeded, but mostly failed....

Words: 338 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Nicholas Romanov's Role in the Russian Revolution

...the collapse of autocracy in Russia? Nicholas Romanov was an indecisive man who was easily influenced by others. Although it was not his character that was the decisive factor in bringing on the revolution. He may have been a leader at the wrong time but if he had related better for the time he was in power. Russia before 1917 was the largest country under one empire. In economic terms it was backward as it was late industrialising and late to emerge from feudalism. In political terms it was also backward as there was no legal political parties nor was there any centrally elected government Russia at this time was under tsarist rule by Nicholas II of the Romanov empire. Nicholas II was brought up by his father Alexander III who didn't believe that his son could take an intelligent interest in anything and therefore did not educate him in the business of state . The fact that his father who died at age 49 thought that he had many more years ahead of him may also be another factor behind Nicholas' poor leadership of Russia . Alexander who died in 1894 had left Russia with a society no longer controlled by tsarist rule and when Nicholas took the throne after his father's death Russian society was not prepared to turn on it's heels and return to how it use to be . Nicholas II was 26 when his father died and was soon to marry the German princess, Alix of Hess, Granddaughter of Queen Victoria . The relationship between Alexandra and Nicholas was a 'critical relationship at...

Words: 1327 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Communism In Russia

...Poverty levels skyrocketed during the early 1900s in Russia after being involved in wars such as the Bolshevik Revolution (History.com Staff). Russia was disunified and looked into the idea of Communism after past wars (The Bolshevik Revolution). Russia rose to Communism because of past Russian warfare, an immense backlash of laborers, and its unstable society. Past Russian warfare hurt the country economically and politically. The Bolshevik Revolution was initiated from a revolt against the Tsar Nicholas II government (The Editors of Encyclopædia Britannica). Tsar Nicholas II sent 11 million peasants...

Words: 957 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Late Development

...This article was downloaded by: [University of Sussex Library] On: 31 August 2011, At: 03:33 Publisher: Routledge Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK Economy and Society Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/reso20 Trotsky, Gerschenkron and the political economy of late capitalist development Ben Selwyn Available online: 25 Jul 2011 To cite this article: Ben Selwyn (2011): Trotsky, Gerschenkron and the political economy of late capitalist development, Economy and Society, 40:3, 421-450 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2011.574425 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Full terms and conditions of use: http://www.tandfonline.com/page/termsand-conditions This article may be used for research, teaching and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, re-distribution, re-selling, loan, sub-licensing, systematic supply or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae and drug doses should be independently verified with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand...

Words: 14030 - Pages: 57

Premium Essay

Who Was Joseph Stalin A Dictator

...Joseph Stalin was the dictator of the Soviet Union from 1924 to March 5, the day of his death. During Stalin’s reign he not only killed many of his enemies ,but many of his own people as well. Stalin's dictatorship affected millions of people and transformed Russia from a backward country into a superpower. Before Stalin was in power he was studying to become a priest in the capital of Georgia (now Tbilisi). Stalin never finished his studies instead getting involved with the cities revolutionary groups risking arrest everyday. Stalin was never much of a public speaker or even much for debates and instead specialized in the organization of activities of the revolutionary groups like spreading propaganda and robbing trains to fund the revolution. Lenin had valued Stalin loyalty and after the revolution gave him many various low priority leadership positions in the new government. Later in 1922 being appointed General Secretary of the Communist Party's Central Committee. (“Biography: Joseph Stalin”)....

Words: 623 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Stalin

...3. Assess the impact that Stalin had on Russia and the Russian people During his rule of Russia from 1928 until 1953, Joseph Stalin made decisions and had characteristics that left both long term and short term impact on the country and its people. One of the biggest impacts made by Stalin on Russia was the Industrialisation of the country; Stalin’s reasons for doing this were mainly down to the fact that Russia was still a backwards, poor, impoverished country when he came to power in 1928. Stalin wanted to change this, and make Russia into a modern, industrial and high power nation. In order to fulfil his aims, Stalin introduced new industrial areas in places such as Kusbass and the Fergana Valley, which were previously not industrial areas, where new industries electric power stations, coal mines, oil fields, machine building and metal processing factories were developed and built. During Stalin’s rule, Magnitogorsk was built, leaving a lasting impact on the USSR’s development as an industrial country In order for these new areas to make a difference to Russia’s development and economy, the state run industries worked in order to live up to the newly adopted 5-Year Plans. These plans set production aims that industries had to meet within the 5 year deadline they were initially set. Over time Russia did build up its industry, and this left a long term impact on Russia, as well as Stalin’s 5-Year Plans being used to make improvements within the Soviet Union until its demise...

Words: 795 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

C Grade Exam Answer

...Russian government, the first world war was the most significant’ How far do you agree with this statement? I feel the First World War is a very strong factor in Russian history and is a very good point to argue with it was the final disappoint that drove the people of Russia to not only take down the tsar but to later kill him. However in the development of Russian government I don’t think it had much importance, out of all the wars in Russian history I feel it was the revolutions in 1917 that played the most important role in the development of the Russian government. Russia involvement in world war one is a very big turning point in Russian history, it removed the tsar from power and left Russian on its knee’s as industries could not keep up with the demands of the war, many soldiers were without weapons and ammunition. But really didn't have a effect on the development of the Russian government it wasn't until the February revolution in 1917 that the development really started, it allowed the few remaining members of the duma including Kerensky to develop the provisional government, it was successful in installing a democratic government as it quickly allowed free elections and allowed legal political parties to be formed. However their freedom of speech and publishing of political materials from opposition was their downfall as it allowed the Bolsheviks to attack them, as there popularity increased the provisional government was starting to grow weak and soon ran away...

Words: 870 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Peter Alekseyevich Romanov's Influence On Russia

...Alekseyevich Romanov. He was one of the most important leaders in Russian history. He helped shape Russia into the super power it is today. Peter lead reforms that launched Russia towards modernization. He waged wars that brought growth, power, and wealth, not only for himself, but for his followers. Peter childhood was quite interesting. Peter’s father, the ruler of Russia at the time, passed when Peter was age four. After his death, the throne was given to Peter’s half brother Fyodor III, however, Fyodor III was a sickly child and would surely have a short rein. Instead of Fyodor III, the real power fell to the Miloslavskys; the relatives of Fyodor III. The Miloslavskys pushed Peter and the Naryshkin out of the picture, establishing what would seem as if preparation for rule. When Fyodor died...

Words: 777 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

History Essay - Great Plague

...Essay: How far was there political and economic reform during the period 1881-1914? (30 Marks) The years in Russia between 1881 and 1914 were a time of great instability and unrest. Political assassinations were common place and military defeat was normal. Furthermore, Russia was an economically backward country – its industry was based solely around agriculture which itself was outdated and not modern. Russia wanted to become a great power like Britain, to do this it would have to be able to deal with these problems and would be essential for the survival of the Tsarist system. In 1881 Russia was a very diverse country, there were many different cultures and languages spoken and 80% of the population were peasants. Alexander III unexpectedly came to the throne in 1881 on the assassination of Alexander II. Alexander III was under no illusion that he could suffer the same fate as his father. He introduced repression of opponents as the corner stone of his reign. Alexander had three main beliefs: Repression of opponents, undoing the reforms of his father and to restore Russia’s position internationally and also her national identity, which he believed had been diluted throughout the 19th century. These were labelled ‘Russification’ and they came into being immediately he was crowned tsar in 1881. The primary aspect of Russification was to rid Russia of western ideas that Alexander III believed had weakened the nation and reduced its national identity. So, there was some reform but...

Words: 997 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Review on the Gorbachev Phenomenon: a Historical Interpretation by Moshe Lewin

...the late 1910’s to present (1988 when the book was published) that corresponds to the growth of the Soviet Union from an undeveloped agricultural society to an urban industrial power. Moshe focuses on social changes and the impacts that occur therein affecting the population’s demographics. Russia entered into World War One in 1914 with largest military force on the face of the earth. However, size did not seem to matter because of the poor weapons technology and incompetent leadership. Russia met this feat with failure, losing 1.7 million soldiers and leaving 3.9 million more wounded. Russia and its leadership were in shambles, and the Tsar Nicholas II began to lose strength in his reputation. In 1917 Russia was an economically backwards country; there was a promising yet feeble parliament and uneasy peasant workers. The main reason for change in Russia came with the beginnings of the Soviet Union through riots and demonstrations in Petrograd, later to be known as St. Petersburg. On the 15th of March the Tsar, Nicholas II, abdicated his position. This fall of the Tsar, gave rise to the idea of socialism and the idea of a world revolution. As contemporary Russia was forming, the people began to change. The population became more culturally diverse and well educated, which was a spark for the government to reform. With the increasing education and urbanization of the population came desires and aspirations which the government was forced to provide outlets to appease the general...

Words: 731 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

How Far Were the Economic Reforms of Witte the Most Important Development Within Russia Between 1881-1903?

...within Russia between 1881-1903? (30 marks) It is a compelling argument that the reforms of Witte were the most important development in Russia between 1881-1903. Witte, as Finance Minister, was in a unique position to improve the great power status of Russia by improving the one thing that was holding the country back; it’s economy. There were several strands to his economic development of Russia such as establishing better communication between east and west by building the Trans-Siberian railway, using state intervention to increase the production of primary industries such as iron, coal and oil and opening up the vast potential of Siberia. However, to a lesser extent it can be argued that Witte’s policies had little effect on Russia, as it remained a largely peasant society with the serfs being tied to their land through crippling debts due to redemption payments. Also, the industrialisation of Russia led to social unrest which may in turn have led Russia to regress. Finally, other developments such as Russification and the repressive policies of Tsar Alexander III, again may have negated any positive change that Witte’s reforms brought. Some historians argue that the policies of Witte were the most important in the development of Russia between 1881-1903. This is a compelling argument because unlike the previous finance ministers, he tackled the issues that were really holding the economy back, namely the lack of reliable communication between west and east Russia and...

Words: 1294 - Pages: 6