Free Essay

What Use Is the Westminster Model of British Government?

In: Other Topics

Submitted By AG02
Words 1595
Pages 7
What use is the Westminster Model of British Government?

The Westminster model for centuries has always been the face of British politics. “Traditionally British political scientists tended to believe that the Westminster model provided democratic and effective government” and “was well suited to gradual and evolutionary change, capable of adapting where appropriate but conserving traditions and conventions that had proven themselves to be effective over a long period” (McAulla, 2006, p. 14). However, within recent decades the debate of whether the Westminster model is of use to the British government was created. This can largely be a result to the United Kingdom joining the European Union and aspects of devolution. To answer the question of what use is the Westminster model of British government, the Westminster model must firstly be understood. Thus, I will first explain the core features of the Westminster model and then assess its use of British government.
The Westminster model is a unique one and parliamentary sovereignty exemplifies this. Under the Westminster system, power resides exclusively in a single national authority; parliament with no entrenched and autonomous powers being vested in any other body (Norton, 2004, p. 324). As such, no national body can question the legitimacy of its decisions, however, theoretically, the monarch holds the power to dissolve parliament. Other than that, parliament can pass any bill it wishes in theory and can remove any previously made law as parliament cannot bind their successors to existing legislation. Though, it should be noted that the judiciary can question legislation on legal grounds but it cannot block or overturn any legislation. As such, parliament has the ultimate power. This is completely different from the United States where the American Constitution provides for and the establishment of the separation of governing powers between legislative, executive and the judiciary and incorporates a series of both checks and balances thereby ensuring no branch of government has too much power.
Additionally, within the Westminster system, there is majority party control of the executive. Traditionally, Britain had a two party political system whereby they compete to gain majority control of parliament (McAnulla, 2006, p. 13). Parliament is elected using the first-past-the-vote system hence; one political party can usually obtain a majority in the House of Commons. The leader of the winning party is then responsible for forming a cabinet of ministers who are usually selected from the MPs of the majority party. Thus, cabinet ministers who form the executive are usually also members of the legislative; giving parliament a lot of power. This fusion works as it is supported by traditions of strong party discipline (McAnulla, 2006, p. 13). This discipline is ensured by each party operating a ‘whip’ system to ensure that back-bench MPs support their leadership. Under this system, MPs can be subject to varieties of punishment if they do not back the party line.
This leads to another unique characteristic of the Westminster model, strong cabinet government. In fact, Wright (2008, p. 48) argues that strong government is ‘the big truth’ about British politics, the key to understanding its character (cited in McAnulla, 2006, p. 14). Within this model, the Prime Minister appoints ministers which are accountable to parliament. The work of ministers is coordinated through cabinet meetings chaired by the prime minister and the cabinet takes collective responsibility for all decisions taken by government (McAnulla, 2006, p. 14). In other words, strong cabinet government basically means that “the executive is in a powerful position to lead government and pass the legislation it wishes” (McAnulla, 2006, p. 14).
Further, there is also the existence of an institutionalised opposition. This facilitates the main losing party to form a shadow cabinet responsible for opposing the government. Thus, ensuring the present government is held to account in parliament (McAnulla, 2006, p. 14). All of these features are what makes the Westminster model distinctive and even though there were numerous changes over the years, these key features remain present today.
However, it should be noted that there are three variants of the Westminster model - the Prime Ministerial Model, the Cabinet Model and the Baronial model - all of which presents an answer of who holds the most power within the model. Within the Prime Ministerial model argued by McIntosh (1962) and Crossman (1963) posits that the Prime Minister dominates the government and policy-making. He or she has the power to appoint or remove ministers, set cabinet agenda and appoint senior civil servants. The Prime Minister is also in a strong position to shape the overall direction of policy while ministers remain preoccupied with their designated areas (McAnulla, 2006, p. 15). On the other hand, Jones (1969) argued that power lies in the collective decision-making body of cabinet as the Prime Minister is heavily dependent on his or her ministers. Practically, this argument has merits as it is difficult for the Prime Minister to have the knowledge or expertise of departments and policy areas that would enable him or her to dominate government (McAnulla, 2006, p. 16). Whereas, the Baronial model states that it is the individual members who have enormous power over their own departments, which they manage with relative independence from other ministers including the Prime Minister. Norton (2000) argues that there are limits to collegiality between ministers since most ministers will resent interference by others within their areas of concern (McAnulla, 2006, p. 16). As such, according to academics, traditionally, there are three variants of the Westminster model and of where power really lies.
Nevertheless, the Westminster model does have some advantages to the British government. Particularly, the model has been justified on normative grounds that is, it is desirable and works well as well as pragmatic grounds; the model is deeply embedded to alter fully. For instance, in 2004, the government moved to create a Supreme Court and a full separation of the executive and judiciary thereby removing the Law Lords from the House of Lords. But the change has encountered some judicial resistance (Dunleavy, 2006, p. 321). Hence, it can be seen that since the Westminster model is so embedded into British government, it will be extremely difficult to change this system.
Another advantage of the Westminster model is that it creates a strong government which is invested with real power to head the country. This can be both a good thing and a bad thing as it depends on the party in power and their intentions. As Dicey notes
“The sovereignty of Parliament is (from a legal point of view) the dominant characteristic of our political institutions. ... The principle of Parliamentary sovereignty means neither more nor less than this, namely, that Parliament ... has, under the English constitution, the right to make or unmake any law whatever, and, further, that no person or body is recognized by the law of England as having a right to override or set aside the legislation of Parliament” (Dicey, 1915, pp 3-4; cited in Prosser, 1996, p. 475).
However, the model has in place safeguards to prevent the ruling party abusing power as they are held to account by the opposition and the House of Lords. As such, the Westminster model is of use to British government as it gives government actual power to do as they wish provided the betterment of the people.
Conversely, critics argue that the model neglects the informal aspects of the political process (McAnulla, 2006, p. 16). Many assert that the Westminster model concentrates on the political elite and the central political institutions of the state (Gamble, 1999, 406). For instance, little attention is paid to the impact which interest groups such as businesses can have on the decisions a government makes. This focus on Westminster institutions means that various regional, local and sub-national institutions that hold power are ignored in terms of their importance (McAnulla, 2006, p. 17). This can be a major problem since due to the United Kingdom’s role in the European Union, there now exists other bodies that challenge the majority party’s power.
Moreover, critics argue that even if the Westminster model has proven useful in the past, over recent decades it has been an increasingly outdated system of British politics (McAnulla, 2006, p. 17). Factors such as growth in interest groups, entry into the European Union and globalization have been used to support this claim. For instance, the United Kingdom’s entry into the European Union (then the European Community) in 1973 meant that the United Kingdom parliament was no longer the sole decision-making body concerning British law (McAnulla, 2006, p. 17). This is exemplified for example where British law and European law conflicts, European law would take precedence.
Ultimately, though there are weaknesses of the model, supporters of the Westminster model emphasize its efficiency, its ability to make decisions quickly without being blocked by other institutional powers and its internal systems of correction. Thus, the use of the Westminster model is to give government actual power to direct the state efficiently.

Bibliography
Dunleavy, Patrick, 2006, ‘The Westminster Model and the Distinctiveness of British Politics” in Patrick Dunleavy et al. (eds), Developments in British Politics 8 (London, Palgrave Macmillan).
Gamble, Andrew, 1990, ‘Theories of British Politics’ in Political Studies, vol. 38, pp. 404-420.
McAnulla, Stuart, 2006, British Politics: A Critical Introduction (London: Continuum).
Norton, Philip, 2004, ‘The Changing Constitution’, in Bill Jones et al. (eds), Politics UK (Essex: Pearson Education Limited)
Prosser, Tony, 1996, ‘Understanding the British constitution’ in Political studies, vol. 44, pp. 473-487. http://www.dadalos.org/int/parteien/grundkurs4/gb/westminster.htm Word Count: 1,482

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

British Oltical View Through the Westminster Alice (Parody of Alice in Wonderland)

...The British Political Reflection through The Westminster Alice by Saki, The Parody of Lewis Carroll’s Alice in Wonderland Lecturer: Dr. Novita Dewi, M.S., M.A (Hons) by: Miranda A. R Siregar Student Number: 136332007 THE GRADUATE PROGRAM IN ENGLISH LANGUAGE STUDIES SANATA DHARMA UNIVERSITY YOGYAKARTA 2014 The British Political Reflection through The Westminster Alice by Saki, The Parody of Lewis Carroll’s Alice in Wonderland I. Introduction Alice and the adventure in wonderland and Alice through the looking glass are the master pieces of literary work by Lewis Carroll. The characters in the story, particularly Alice herself become such an iconic character. Alice is basically a girl who has a high imagination and able to see the world differently, out of general border. We may discover several works based on Alice in wonderland, from the day the story was published until this present time. There are a lot of books and movies that inspired by Alice. In this essay, I would like to discuss is “The Westminster Alice” by Hector Hugo Munro (Saki) in 1902, The specialty of this book is so much different from any other work adaptation of Alice in Wonderland, which most of them are actually similar story or the adult version of Alice. This book is a parody of British politic based on Alice in Wonderland character. The Westminster Alice is the name of a collection of vignettes written by Hector Hugh Munro (Saki) in 1902 and published...

Words: 2681 - Pages: 11

Free Essay

Anything

...1/19/2015 Westminster system - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Westminster system From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia The Westminster system is a democratic parliamentary system of government modelled after the politics of the United Kingdom. This term comes from the Palace of Westminster, the seat of the Parliament of the United Kingdom. The system is a series of procedures for operating a legislature. It is used, or was once used, in the national legislatures and subnational legislatures of most Commonwealth and ex-Commonwealth nations upon being granted responsible government, beginning with the first of the Canadian provinces in 1848 and the six Australian colonies between 1855 and 1890. However some former colonies (e.g. Nigeria) have adopted the presidential system as their form of government. The Houses of Parliament are situated within the Palace of Westminster, in London. Contents 1 Characteristics 2 Operation 3 Role of the head of state 4 Cabinet government 5 Bicameral and unicameral parliaments 6 Criticisms 7 Ceremonies 8 Current countries 9 Former countries 10 See also 11 Notes 12 Bibliography 13 External links Characteristics A Westminster system of government may include some of the following features: a sovereign or head of state who functions as the nominal or legal and constitutional holder of executive power, and holds numerous reserve powers, but whose daily duties mainly consist of performing ceremonial functions...

Words: 4643 - Pages: 19

Premium Essay

Parliamentary

...Munoz-Palma Street, Ermita, Manila, Metro Manila Parliamentary: A Good Form of Government Aira C. Adao UC-48 Prof. Marvin Ignacio Politics and Governance January 20, 2015 I. Title: Parliamentary: A Good Form of Government II. Abstract HYPOTHESIS 1. What is Parliamentary Government? 2. What are the types of Parliamentary Government? 3. What are the advantages and disadvantages of Parliamentary System? 4. What countries are implementing Parliamentary System? 5. What is the difference between Parliamentary System and Presidential System? OBJECTIVES * To point out the good sides of the Parliamentary system. * To discuss the process of legislation of the Parliamentary Government. * To tackle the important topic about Parliamentary system. * To form a good information to the readers about the essence of Parliamentary system. SIGNIFICANCE * This term paper gives information to the reader about the system of Parliamentary Government. * This paper will benefit the ones who search information about the essence of Parliamentary system. III. Introduction Parliament, (from Old French: parlement; Latin: parliamentum) the original legislative assembly of England, Scotland, or Ireland and successively of Great Britain and the United Kingdom; legislatures in some countries that were once British colonies are also known as parliaments. The British Parliament, often referred to as the “Mother of Parliaments,” consists of the...

Words: 5723 - Pages: 23

Free Essay

Westminister

...Graded Discussion 2 Second graded discussion question: Graded Discussion 2: Opens June 13 closes June 17, 2016 @ 3:30 pm (EC Time) (15 marks). Question: Evaluate whether the Westminster model system of government adopted by English speaking Caribbean countries accommodates corruption Graded Discussion 2 by Sophia De La Rosa Williams - Wednesday, 15 June 2016, 9:05 AM   Westminster system of Government  can be defined as a democratic,parliamentary system of Government modelled after that of the United Kingdom system , as used in the Palace of Westminster (the Parliament of the United Kingdom).This system is a series of procedures for operating a legislature.It is used in most commonwealth nations.Corruption is the abuse of entrusted power for private gain. It can be classified as grand,petty and political,depending on the on the amount of money, lost and the sector where it occurs.According to Arnold Heidenheimer corruption is "perversion or destruction of integrity in the discharge of public duties by bribery or favour".I think it is safe to say that corruption and the Westminster system go hand in hand, the Westminster system has an inbuilt lack of checks and balances,this system is also based on majority rule, which is the rule of first pass the post method of election.In Trinidad and Tobago the use of ones office as a bargaining tool is becoming more apparent each day,we have the Housing Development Cooperation (HDC),this ministry seems to be a strong hold for corruption...

Words: 4973 - Pages: 20

Free Essay

Presidentialism

...POL101 Research Essay by Mallory Watters Australia’s Political institutions and practices echo that of the British Political system, specifically the Westminster system. This is a result of Australia’s values reflecting religious tolerance, freedom of speech and association, and the rule of law. Although the Australian Political system shares many similarities with The British Westminster Political system, there are number of subtle differences at the same time. Australian politics operates as a multi-party system; there are two major parties, as a result of the coalition between the Liberal Party and National Party, and the Australian Labor Party. The leader of the elected party becomes the Prime Minister, and for the party to be in power it needs to have a majority in the House of Representatives in order to make and enact policies on behalf of their party and the country. Since the advancement of technology and the availability of television and radio, the Prime Minister and the Opposition Leader have been identified by the public as the leader of their parties due to fact that they are the person that the public sees the most. As a result they have been key representatives of their party in order to get their message across in the shortest possible amount of time. Due to the Prime Minister and the Opposition Leader being identified as the leader the achievements and failures of their political party fall heavily upon them. Thus many political spectators are seeing...

Words: 2651 - Pages: 11

Free Essay

Constitutional Reform

...Introduction The monarchy has been described as ‘the keystone in the arch of the British Constitution’. It is, indeed, an extremely significant part of our culture and history, as well as being central to our system of Government. It will therefore be necessary to begin any discussion of the constitutional issues involved in its abolition by outlining the current functions of the head of state in Britain. As ‘a state without a monarch is a republic’, it will then be necessary to consider the constitutional issues which would be implicit in giving effect to such a republic. These issues will include decisions as to the type of president we would have, how they would be selected, and the scope and extent of powers they would possess. This discussion is not intended to be one of the relative merits of a monarchy versus a republic: indeed, the decision to abolish the monarchy has already been made. Rather, it is an attempt to answer the question of how this central feature of our constitution could be replaced. In answering this question, I will look to a possible alternative, namely an elected president, and determine whether, and on what basis they could take over the functions of the monarch. Other constitutional issues regarding the selection of such a President must then be considered, along with other constitutional issues arising in this context. As a preliminary issue, it should be noted that in this hypothetical situation, it is Prince Charles, or rather King...

Words: 3236 - Pages: 13

Free Essay

Politics

...GOVERNMENT AND POLITICS AS LEVEL UNIT TWO GOVERNING THE UK “Never, never, never give up” Winston S Churchill 1874-1965 1 GOVERNING THE UK 50% of AS [25% of A2] UNIT TWO SAMPLE QUESTION Answer one question from Section A and one question from Section B in 80 minutes. Spend 40 minutes on Section A and 40 minutes on Section B SECTION A QUESTION ONE PRIME MINISTERIAL POWER “For too long the big political decisions in this country have been made in the wrong place. They are not made around the Cabinet table where they should be, but they are taken on the sofa in Tony Blair’s office. No notes are kept and no one takes the blame when things go wrong. That arrogant style of government must come to an end. I will restore the proper process of government. I want to be Prime Minister of this country not a President (Source: David Cameron, The Times, 5th October 2006) “The Cabinet is the committee at the centre of the British political system. Every Thursday during Parliament, Secretaries of State from all departments as well as other ministers meet in the Cabinet Room in Downing Street to discuss the big issues of the day. The Prime Minister chairs the meeting, selects its members and also recommends their appointment as ministers to the monarch. The present Cabinet has 23 members (21 MPs and two peers). The secretary of the Cabinet is responsible for preparing records of its discussions and decisions”. (Source: From a modern textbook) (a) What...

Words: 68254 - Pages: 274

Premium Essay

Politicals Institutions in the United Kingdom and the United States of America

...constitutional monarchy and unitary state. It is made up of four individual countries, which are England, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Wales. It is governed by a parliamentary system and its seat of government is in London. There are also three devolved powers outside of the capital, located in Belfast, Cardiff and Edinburgh (the three capital cities of Ireland, Wales and Scotland respectively). There are also a number of islands that are constitutionally tied to the United Kingdom constitution, but that are not part of the UK. They are the bailiwicks (headed by a bailiff, appointed by the crown to administer) of Jersey and Guernsey (to the south of the UK) and also the Isle of Man, which is off the north-east coast of the British mainland. However, it is true to say that the majority of British might even get confused as to the difference between the United Kingdom of Great Britain and the British Isles. In fact, it should be remembered that there is a difference between nationality and citizenship. A Scots and Welsh should correctly give the answer that they are of British citizenship. But, they should reply that they are either Scottish or Welsh regarding their nationality. The English all tend to give the same answer to the question (that they are British citizens and they have British...

Words: 5493 - Pages: 22

Premium Essay

Singapore

... A. Religion B. Race C. Culture V. Conclusion Singapore: The Cultural Aspects Within The Singapore Culture consists of various ethnic backgrounds. They are alike in some ways and different in others. The culture consists of different organizations that describe the many aspects related to its culture. I hope to learn more as I continue my research of the Singapore culture. I think that I will find it quite similar to that of the American culture. Singapore was a part of the British Malaya for many centuries. The British came to an island and set up a port and colony, in the year 1918. For over two centuries the British ruled Singapore and its port. During this time Singapore attracted many migrants. Singapore became a republic, independent nation, after World War II. It remains the same today. The Singapore Population is made up of Chinese, Malays, Indians, Caucasians, and Eurasians. Singaporean culture is best described as a melting pot of mainly Chinese, British, Malay, Indian cultures; A reflection of its immigrant history. Despite rapid industrialization, the majority of Singaporeans celebrate the major festivals associated with their respective religions. The variety of religions found in Singapore is a direct reflection of the diversity of races living there. The Chinese are predominantly followers of Buddhism and Taoism (deity worship), though some are Christians. Malays are overwhelmingly Muslims and most of Singapore's Indians are Hindus; there...

Words: 1518 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Politics Exam Edinbrugh

...Northern Consortium United Kingdom – Politics Past paper questions for June exam < Module 1 > Section A 1a What are the differences between Public Bills Committees and Select Committees? [5] Public Bills Committee is part of legislative process, whereas Select Committee is part of scrutiny process. In the former committee, the bill is examined by line by line to ensure that its wording and language is clear to allow any amendments on the bill. In the latter committee, there are two departments – governmental and non-governmental. They examine government departments’ expeditures , policies and policies. There are between 16 to 50 members in the PBC who are selected by Committee of Selection whose 7 out 9 members are ships. On the other hand, there are 11 members in the SCs and to eliminate “the conflict of interest, all the members are backbench members who are elected using the Alternative vote system. 2a What are the main functions of Parliament and how well does it perform them? [5] < This question is a 20-mark question > 3a What are the differences between direct and representative democracy? [5] In direct democracy, people are directly involved in decision-making processes, whereas in representative democracy, people elect MPs who will represent and form a government in Parliament. For instance, some qualified members of Athenian society were involved in decision-making and a referendum is a limited form of direct democracy. Also general elections...

Words: 18470 - Pages: 74

Free Essay

Gov and Pol

...which questions to do, the following principles are recommended: It is almost certain that you will be better off choosing your strongest question to do first. You should choose questions on the basis of how well you can answer the section (c) part. The (c) part carries 25 of the 40 marks available for the whole answer. Do not choose a question simply because you can do part (a) especially well. The (a) question is only worth 5 marks. It would be illogical to choose your strongest (a) part if you cannot do well on section (c). If you cannot decide between several (c) parts, i.e. you can do more than one equally well, make your choice on the basis of part (b) which carries 10 marks. But remember, it is the (c) parts that will determine most what your overall mark will be. So, when you first look at the exam paper, look at the (c) sections first. Assessment Objectives Each question is divided into three sections, as follows: carries 5 marks carries 10 marks carries 25 marks The way you answer questions should be determined by the way assessment objectives are distributed. Assessment objectives provide the basis upon which examiners award marks. You need to be familiar with them to maximise your marks. They will help direct your revision and with the answers to the questions. A full explanation of...

Words: 51996 - Pages: 208

Free Essay

Ethnic Conflict

...new Irish Republic whereas 6 of the nine counties from the province of Ulster remained under British control due to the fact that they contained a majority of Unionists, generally of the protestant faith, although they did also contain a significant minority of nationalists, around a third of the population, who were generally of the Roman catholic faith. This then led to nationalists being treated unequally in terms of housing and employment with nationalists facing significantly higher rates of unemployment than their protestant neighbors. The catholic population of the six counties also faced a problem, in that the police force of the north, the RUC, were predominantly from protestant/unionist backgrounds, with Catholics accounting for around 12% of the total force, and were seen as upholding the unionist domination of the six counties, although the auxiliary police force, the B specials, were even more vehemently hated by Catholics perhaps with good reason given that due to their actions they were disbanded by the British prime minister in 1970. By 1969 then there was a powder keg atmosphere in the six counties with nationalists, inspired by events in America, agitating for civil rights and unionists attempting to sustain their domination. By the end of 1969 the RUC were no longer able to contain the situation in the north, powers were transferred back to Westminster and the British army were deployed to the streets of the cities and towns to assist the RUC and, in the eyes...

Words: 2288 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Medi

...For other uses, see Constitution (disambiguation). A constitution is a set of fundamental principles or established precedents according to which a state or other organization is governed.[1] These rules together make up, i.e. constitute, what the entity is. When these principles are written down into a single document or set of legal documents, those documents may be said to embody a written constitution; if they are written down in a single comprehensive document, it is said to embody a codified constitution. Constitutions concern different levels of organizations, from sovereign states to companies and unincorporated associations. A treaty which establishes an international organization is also its constitution, in that it would define how that organization is constituted. Within states, a constitution defines the principles upon which the state is based, the procedure in which laws are made and by whom. Some constitutions, especially codified constitutions, also act as limiters of state power, by establishing lines which a state's rulers cannot cross, such as fundamental rights. An example is the constitution of the United States of America. George Washington at Constitutional Convention of 1787 signing of the U.S. Constitution. The Constitution of India is the longest written constitution of any sovereign country in the world,[2] containing 444 articles in 22 parts,[3][4] 12 schedules and 118 amendments, with 117,369 words in its English-language translation,[5]...

Words: 9424 - Pages: 38

Premium Essay

Australia

...Australia. Plan. 1. Australia explained in brief 2. States and territories 3. Sistem of governement 1. Australian democracy 2. The constitution 3. The federal government and Parliament 4. State and local government 5. The judiciary 4. The wildlife and conservation 1. Wuldlife 2. Nature conservation 3. Regreening Australia 4. Education 5. International links 5. Cultural growth 1. The australia council 2. Aboriginal arts 6. Australia today 1. AUSTRALIA EXPLAINED IN BRIEF. Australia is an independent Western democracy with a population of more than 17.6 million. It is one of the world’s most urbanised countries, with about 70 per cent of the population living in the 10 largest cities. Most of the population is concentrated along the eastern seaboard and the south-eastern corner of the continent. Australia’s lifestyle reflects its mainly Western origins, but Australia is also a multicultural society which has been enriched by nearly five million settlers from almost 200 nations. Four out of 10 Australians are migrants or the first-generation children of migrants, half of them from non-English speaking backgrounds. In 1991-92, East Asia contributed 41 per cent of settler arrivals. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people totalled 265 378 at the last census, nearly 1.5 per cent of the population. Two thirds of the indigenous people live in towns and cities. Many others live in rural and remote areas, and some still have a broadly...

Words: 5310 - Pages: 22

Free Essay

Gartner Business Process Management Summit 2013

...Summit 2013 13 – 14 March | London, UK | gartner.com/eu/bpm Aspire, Challenge, Transform: Driving Breakthrough Business Performance TriP rePorT The annual Gartner Business Process Management Summit was held on 13 – 14 March 2013, at the Park Plaza Westminster Bridge. This report summarizes and provides highlights from the event. SAve The DATe The Gartner Business Process Management Summit 2014 will take place on 19 – 20 March in London, UK. We hope to see you again! overview This year’s event was focusing on helping delegates break free from small scale, iterative BPM projects to deliver truly game-changing business transformation. In the opening presentation of the summit, Summit Chair John Dixon invited you to aspire to greater things, to challenge the status quo in your organizations and to transform your organizations using BPM. We carried this theme into our keynotes and track presentations, and we hope it has helped to spark some new ideas that will make a difference to you and your organization. TABle of ConTenTS Park Plaza Westminster Bridge, London, UK Tina Nunno speaking at the Gartner Business Process Management Summit 2013 2 3 5 Key Take-Aways Keynote Sessions Top of Mind Concerns — What Attendees Asked About Top 10 Most-Attended Sessions Attendee Snapshot Top 10 best-rated sessions Sponsors Post Event Resources 5 5 6 7 8 © 2013 Gartner, Inc. and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. Gartner is a registered trademark of Gartner, Inc...

Words: 2005 - Pages: 9