The historians Holt et believed that Suleiman was not the greatest Ottoman ruler. They accused him of being reclusive and moody and recall an event in which he acted on impulse from paranoia. Other historians disagree and ultimately see his actions as those of a confident ruler prepared to do what was necessary to protect his position and a leader that brought his empire to continued greatness earning the reputation within his empire as the lawgiver and without as the magnificent.
As in source A it tells us that he was a very careful and temperate man; that he took his job seriously. As the people in the empire where terrified in some of the decisions he made, they still look up to him because they knew, he was doing things that were right