Premium Essay

Why Didnt the Articles of Confederation Work

In:

Submitted By Popa123
Words 287
Pages 2
Jesús David Abaroa S.
USA HISTORY
3”A”

WHY DIDN’T THE ARTICLES OF CONFEDERATION WORK? The articles of the confederation were a document which established the first governmental structure, and it unified the thirteen states that had fought in the American Revolution. They went official and into effect on March 1, 1781 and it lasted until March 4, 1789, day there were replaced by the US Constitution. The purpose of these articles was to create a confederation of states in which each state preserves its own sovereignty, freedom and independence. In other words, all states were independent from the United States and only responsible for the defense. The articles of the confederation were made to keep the government as weak as possible. But many problems became apparent soon. The weaknesses that became apparent in the articles of confederation were too many. First, each state had only one but in the congress, no matter of its size. The congress had not power to tax people or states. No national court system existed. Laws required majority to pass on the congress. These are some of the weaknesses the articles of confederation had. Under the effects of the articles of confederation states were often arguing among themselves. And they refused to support the national government financially. During that time the national government was powerless to enforce anything. Each state printed its own money. Each state had their own army. There was no stable economy during that time. It was until 1786 that Shays’ Rebellion occurred in western Massachusetts, looking to rise debt and economic chaos. As more states wanting to change the articles of confederation, a meeting was settled in Philadelphia on May 25, 1787 called the constitutional convention.

Similar Documents

Free Essay

Anti-Federalists

...position as a federalist is to ratificate the constitution while also creating a strong central government by separation of both of the powers combined. All the federalists were always strong believers in the constitution, believing that this ratification was the only way they were all able to achieve a fair society where all people can all have their rights to liberty, life and the pursuit of happiness, while also wanting to help shape future analysis of the Constitution for the better and in beneficial ways. By them being able to build a sufficient government with the foundation of the basis of popular sovereignty, without the need of sacrificing any sovereignty of the varied states fairness of the new government, it can be secured and work as it should. The rich would be happy in this case, because they would feel like the new Constitution was benefcial on their part, because the fact that rich's votes would earn much more value than the less fortunate in the states like what they wanted to achieve. They can possibly keep the potential of tyranny from becoming something dangerous to their people and they know that safeguards they have with the government will keep it from overpowering. The constitution should be ratified as a Federalist because the nation might of never survived without the constitution by their side leading them and a stronger government was necessary at this very point in desperate time. The federalists explained that a different stronger government...

Words: 875 - Pages: 4