Free Essay

Why Uk Should Stay in the Eu

In:

Submitted By katielp161
Words 542
Pages 3
Let me paint you a picture of a Britain not in the EU, a Britain alone and isolated. This Britain faces unemployment of around 11 million people. It faces problems of reduced immigration creating even more financial difficulties. It faces an extremely volatile and uncertain situation regarding future trade with other countries. Today I am going to talk about why these two main points- trade and immigration – form the argument of why we should stay in the EU.
The first issue I am going to raise is trade. A huge benefit to the UK and UK businesses is that as a member of the EU we have access to worry-free and tariff-free trading with all its members. As such, approximately a staggering 50% of our exports go to the EU. Critically, leaving the EU puts our economy under threat. The hope of euro sceptics that we can easily enjoy a free-trade agreement such as Switzerland and Norway is both unrealistic and more importantly dangerous.
If the UK leaves the EU, it is likely that UK based firms will relocate abroad, leaving a massive hole in our economy and forcing us into another recession. Furthermore, if we were to still have a free-trade agreement with the EU, we would still have to comply with all the strict regulations. Only, these would now be regulation that we had no input or control over what so ever.
Can you honestly say, having just come out of one of the biggest depressions in over half a century and with confidence slowly crawling out of the gutters, that you are prepared to risk the entire economy based purely on a theory of hope? Simply a roll of the dice if you like. If we want the EU to work in Britain’s interests, then we need to be involved in EU decision-making. Neighboring nations like France … and Germany .. will have no incentive to listen to Britain if we are not playing on the same team.
My other point I am going to raise is immigration. Let it be clear that when we talk about immigration we refer mainly to those coming from Eastern-European countries such as Romania.
Immigrants often receive a bad press from sceptics, when in actual fact it would be very harming to the British economy if they stopped. Firstly, immigrants actually pay more in UK tax than they consume in public services which raises government revenue. Without them, we would have to make further cuts in public spending or pay higher taxes .. or .. .. even both.
Furthermore, migrants also raise the productivity of the economy which boosts economic growth and raises GDP, which, in more simplistic terms, essentially creates a higher level of national income for the UK.
So, to sum up, free-trade has allowed international global success for our economy. We are simply not in a position to be risking our economic future for the sake of chance. Especially in our current volatile position.
Secondly, a loss of immigration will do far more harm than it will good.
Choosing to leave the EU is choosing to lose our influence over our own prosperity. It is choosing to be dictated to. It is choosing to have no choice.

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

David Cameron's Eu Speech

...David Camerons EU speech The 18th of January 2013 David Cameron, the British Prime Minister, delivered a speech long waited for regarding UK’s present position and their wished future in the EU. The reason for this speech lies in the concern and dissatisfaction with the current relationship between UK and the EU and this dissatisfaction was undeniable and irrevocable as it came from multiple parties. Therefor there had been calls for a referendum to be held about participating in the EU or not, which led to the necessity of the speech, given to attain focus on UK’s future and what they would have to do to achieve the visions of the 21st century. It was also necessary to mention to the people that he has visions for the UK as well as Europe and also address the important choice the people has in front of them as it would be put in their hands to decide whether they should continue the cooperation with the EU or not. When a country is in despair it has been proven at several occasions how powerful a motivating and collected speech can be and with the uncertainty of UK’s position in the EU as it is now as well in the future, David Cameron’s was much needed to assert that they will take action and the outcome will be profitable for UK as a whole. The speech consists of 5 main parts where the first one revolves around the past to identify the previous goals of the EU, such as securing peace, which have been reached. To claim that these goals have been reached naturally leads to the...

Words: 1517 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

International Business

...heated debate regarding whether Britain should stay the EU. Critically evaluate whether Britain leaving the EU is a good idea. You should refer to relevant theoretical frameworks in your answer. The European Union is an economic and political union, made up of 27 European Countries. The original treaty was signed in Paris in July 1952, there were six countries that signed, but it only became known as the European Union in 1993, at the Maastricht Treaty. The United Kingdom joined the EU in 1973, and has been a major factor in it since. With globalisation the world seems to be getting smaller each day, and the EU is proof of that, that majority of a continent stand together, a continent that has previously been ravaged by numerous wars. That by being a part of the EU shows the importance of being part of a larger political bloc in such a globalised world. Currently the Euro and many European Countries are not doing so well and are considered to be in a bit of a mess. This is one of the main reasons why the UK are considering leaving the EU, as it is slowly becoming a burden. Currently now the UK is roughly 10% of its GDP, about £150 billion, worse-off every year because it is a member of the EU. So do the benefits outweigh this massive cost? That is the question that so many have tried to answer, most recently David Cameron, British Prime minister. By leaving the EU the UK might be more attractive to foreign investors as the EU has many laws and legislations, places such...

Words: 1535 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Should We Stay in the Eu

...Should the UK remain in the EU? In the aftermath of the Second World War, Winston Churchill called for the creation of a "United States of Europe" to bind France and Germany together. In doing so, he made clear that Britain would be a supportive but independent partner of any such entity. He famously said: 'We are with Europe but not of it." In the end, Britain did join the European Economic Community but only in 1973, 15 years after the Treaty of Rome was signed. We joined the Social Chapter in 1997, eight years after it was adopted by other member states. And we never signed up to Economic and Monetary Union or the Schengen Agreement on common borders. However, it is not until now that the British public have been presented with the opportunity to have their say on the matter of our continued membership. Following the 2015 general election, the re-elected Prime Minister David Cameron reiterated a Conservative Party manifesto commitment to hold an 'in-out' referendum on Britain's membership of the European Union by the end of 2017 following renegotiations with EU leaders. This means that between now and the vote the public have to decide whether Europe benefits the country regarding immigration, trade, investment and the protection of Human Rights and peace. Firstly, with regards to the economic repercussions of leaving the EU, many supporters of the so called “Brexit” claim that Britain would have very little difficulty in negotiating some form of free trade agreement with...

Words: 2009 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Assinment

...statements to be presented to the stakeholders . United kingdom has already adopted IFRS since 2005.I would be discussing on adoption of IFRS by United kingdom for this paper. The United Kingdom has already adopted IFRS for the consolidated financial statements of all companies whose securities trade in a regulated market” (EU Law).The IAS Regulation requires companies with securities either equity or debt acknowledged to trading on a regulated market of any member state of the European Union to use international accounting standards in preparing their consolidated financial statements. As a member state of the European Union, the United Kingdom is subject to IAS Regulation adopted by the European Union in 2002. The EU IAS Regulation requires application of IFRS adopted by the EU for the consolidated financial statements of European companies whose securities trade in a regulated securities market starting in 2005. In the United Kingdom, this would include the London Stock Exchange Main Market. Foreign companies whose “securities trade in a regulated market in the UK is required to report under IFRS as adopted by the EU for their consolidated financial statements” (EU Law). 2. Did the country adopt IFRS or did they make changes to IFRS to adapt to their country’s culture or regulations? The adoption of...

Words: 995 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Can We Live Where We Want

...Essay 3 3rd November 2014 Jeremy Rick Are we born with the right to live where we want? The United Kingdom of Great Briatain, is a group of countries that like to think they are independent. Despite this, the fact is they are merged to a much bigger picture of the European Union. The inclusion of the UK has drawn many positives over the years with the economy, easy holidays, simpler migration and more than anything help from the other large nations in the EU. People from areas outside of the EU like the USA or Asia, would have to get a visa issued to their passport before they can even have a holiday. For people holding passports for countries inside the EU, they can move freely with not much problem and get support in the countries they are travelling to. This was has been ok for many years but in recent times the joining of several smaller countries to the EU has brought an unprecedented influx of immigration to the shore of the UK that has quickly escalated into a national crisis. This is something that has only resulted in only minute positives, with the country now struggling to cope with the demand for jobs and housing causing a lot of anger amongst the people. The UK is made up of England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, which are all considered highly developed courtiers in there own right. The region boasts structured democracies that has controlled and helped the area grow for decades to be one of the most economically stable in the world. This has seen the...

Words: 1883 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Economics

...Economics The UK Economy and Globalisation WHY COUNTRIES TRADE GLOBALISATION Globalisation | Expansion of world trade in goods and services leading to greater international interdependence | Globalisation usually leads to: * An increase in outsourcing * Large sums of money being transferred from country to country for financing When did Globalisation First Start? There are three major stages of globalisation: Stage | When? | What? | 1 | 1870Increase in international trade | * New technology helped improve transport * Reduced cost of moving goods between countriesEnded in 1920s as countries tried to protect home industries against foreign competition so reduced imports. | 2 | 1945 End of Second World War | * Countries keen to rebuilt economies * Led to rapid expansion in world trade * International Monetary Fund and World Bank founded * Promoted trade and economic cooperation | 3 | Now | * Increase in trade and capital flows between countries * Growth of huge companies | Factors Contributing to Globalisation Improvements in transportation | Cost of transporting goods decreased (eg: due to containerisation) meaning goods can be traded competitively worldwide | Improvements to ICT | Communications are much faster and cheaper – payments can be sent between countries immediately at a low cost. Promotion of products via the internet to a worldwide market also increases world trade. | Rising real living standards |...

Words: 4532 - Pages: 19

Premium Essay

Understanding Eu Fiscal Compact

...public referendum or a vote in parliament is more suitable for Ireland when it comes to deciding on EU matters, such as the Fiscal Compact. In addition to that we will interview a person who has strong convictions regarding the Fiscal Compact. To conclude, we will present our opinions and recommendations based upon our research and findings. We will seek to predict whether the Treaty will solve the Eurozone Crisis or plunge the EMU into greater financial instability. Background and Contributing Factors A number of factors contributed to the signing of the Fiscal Compact Treaty on 2 March 2012 (European Council, 2013). Although the Eurozone crisis was the main driving force behind the signing of the Fiscal Compact, a number of flaws existed before the collapse of the Eurozone (McArdle, 2012). McArdle (2012) notes that a major drawback was the fact that the Eurozone didn’t have a common fiscal policy. A “Stability and Growth Pact” (SGP) was passed and came into effect on the 1st January 1999 and made a number of key structural changes (McArdle, 2012). However, by that stage the Eurozone had never endured a deep recession. As a result when the worldwide economic recession hit Europe in the summer of 2007, the stability of the Eurozone was shook to its very foundations (European Commission, 2009). The Eurozone Crisis began in 2008 when a number of debt-heavy countries within the EU, namely Ireland, Greece and Portugal, could no...

Words: 4798 - Pages: 20

Premium Essay

Scotland's Argument Analysis

...as Scotland is predominantly liberal country ruled by a conservative British government. The major issues with this is that many Scots have a different opinion on welfare and taxes as opposed to the UK government. The independence camp argues that should Scotland decide to be independent, they would be free to decide their laws without the interference of England. The issue with this while Scotland would have control over domestic issues, they have little to no say on international issues, the reason being that other countries with similar secessionist movements such as Spain and Turkey would be reluctant to recognize Scotland as an independent country as it would encourage their own separatist movements....

Words: 926 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Politics Exam Edinbrugh

...Northern Consortium United Kingdom – Politics Past paper questions for June exam < Module 1 > Section A 1a What are the differences between Public Bills Committees and Select Committees? [5] Public Bills Committee is part of legislative process, whereas Select Committee is part of scrutiny process. In the former committee, the bill is examined by line by line to ensure that its wording and language is clear to allow any amendments on the bill. In the latter committee, there are two departments – governmental and non-governmental. They examine government departments’ expeditures , policies and policies. There are between 16 to 50 members in the PBC who are selected by Committee of Selection whose 7 out 9 members are ships. On the other hand, there are 11 members in the SCs and to eliminate “the conflict of interest, all the members are backbench members who are elected using the Alternative vote system. 2a What are the main functions of Parliament and how well does it perform them? [5] < This question is a 20-mark question > 3a What are the differences between direct and representative democracy? [5] In direct democracy, people are directly involved in decision-making processes, whereas in representative democracy, people elect MPs who will represent and form a government in Parliament. For instance, some qualified members of Athenian society were involved in decision-making and a referendum is a limited form of direct democracy. Also general elections...

Words: 18470 - Pages: 74

Free Essay

Newspaper

...Polish MP lives in Britain to see why it’s so good Artur Debski, a Polish MP, lives as a migrant in London on £100 a week in an attempt to see why so many Poles prefer Britain to their homeland A Polish MP is living as a migrant in London, looking for a job and a flat and surviving on £100 a week in an attempt to see why so many Poles prefer Britain to their homeland. Following in the footsteps of hundreds of thousands of his compatriots, Artur Debski arrived at the weekend on a low-cost airline, with only a vague offer of a roof over his head “from a Serbian girl in Newham” he met via Facebook. Mr Debski told The Telegraph before leaving home: “I don’t know what I’m going to do there. I’m 45 years old and my English isn’t great. I’ll have to work with my hands, in a kitchen, perhaps, or in a shop.” He aims to find out what attracts so many Poles to Britain despite the fact that their country has one of the EU’s most successful economies. Since the central European country joined the EU in 2004, more than a million Polish nationals are thought to have moved to Britain. Around 70 per cent of younger members of the population consider emigrating, surveys suggest. “It’s dangerous for Poland that so many of our young people are thinking about leaving,” said Mr Debski, an MP from Your Movement, a liberal opposition party. “I want to see why the systems in Britain are working and why they’re not in Poland. I want to see why people in Britain are happy and we Poles are not. “We...

Words: 649 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Common Agricultural Policy and the Uk

...economic impact of EU membership on the UK This note examines the various channels through which membership of the EU affects the UK economy. A general sense of the EU’s economic impact can be gained by reading Section 1 alone. Subsequent sections deal with particular issues, such as the EU’s effect on UK trade relations, in more detail, and compare the UK’s situation with alternative arrangements. Contents 1 Introduction and summary 2 2 Cost-benefit analyses of EU membership 5 3 The effect of the EU on UK trade relations 6 4 Impact of immigration from the EU 16 5 The impact of EU regulation 20 6 Fiscal consequences of EU membership – the EU budget 23 7 The EU’s effect on consumer prices 28 8 Foreign direct investment (FDI) 30 Appendix table: a comparison of the EU with alternative trading arrangements 32 Boxes Would independence over trade policy lead to better results? 15 The EU budget – winners and losers 27 Trade barriers and economic efficiency 29 Related Library briefings Leaving the EU, Research Paper RP13/42 In brief: UK-EU economic relations, Standard Note SN6091 Norway’s relationship with the EU, Standard Note SN6522 Switzerland’s relationship with the EU, Standard Note SN6090 The UK and Europe: time for a new relationship?, Standard Note SN6393 1 Introduction and summary 1.1 Understanding the economic impact of EU membership EU membership influences...

Words: 14699 - Pages: 59

Premium Essay

Referendums

...issues for discussion rather than to decide or confirm policy questions. In relation to the extract, Walsi is being accused of not having the knowledge base of understanding of actual independence. Walsi was being accountable for shortfall in any economic growth expected and being able to financially match the living needs of people, the needs of all generations - from health / population growth. 05) Using your own knowledge, as well as the extract, consider the circumstances in which the UK government might choose to call a referendum (10 marks) Only one nationwide referendum had taken place in the UK before the alternative referendum. This occurred in 1975 when Harold Wilson (the British Prime minister at the time) asked ‘Do you think the UK should stay in the EU?’ In answer to his question, 67% of the voters answered ‘yes’ so therefore the UK is still part of the EU today. Not only one referendum has happened, several referendums have also been held in particular regions of the UK such as Scotland and Wales. In 1997, voters in Scotland were asked whether they wanted a Scottish Parliament while voters in Wales were asked whether they wanted a Welsh Assembly. The answer to both of these referendums was yes. Also, just recently: - Scotland has been called into play - the belief that the majority is wanting independence – that as a country it is able to sustain itself economically. A surge in the uprising from public unrest and politicians wanting control of the way they...

Words: 1280 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Immigration to the Eu

...International Business, year 1 07\11\2013 Table of content Introduction…………………………………………………………………………………………… pg3 1. Immigration…………………………………………………………………………………………… pg3 2.1 What is migration?..............................................................................................................pg3 2.2 Reasons for migration……………………………………………………………………………pg4 2.3 European Policy about migration…………………………………………………………pg7 2. Immigration: Costs and Benefits………………………………………………………………..pg8 3.4 Analyze of the social-economic and political effects on the EU by migration ………………………………………………………………………………………………………….pg 8 3.5 Cost and Benefit Table………………………………………………………………………pg10 Conclusion……………………………………………………………………………………………...pg12 Introduction Migration is an actual and controversial topic that is a complex phenomenon that concerns the new as well as the future generations. Migration can be describes as “move to survive!” . The move towards opportunities for life, tied to the human spirit, seeking adventure, pursuing dreams, and finding reasons to hope even in the most adverse circumstances. This is the reason for migration!...

Words: 3964 - Pages: 16

Premium Essay

“Aging Europe and the Looming Pension Crisis.”

...“Aging Europe and the looming pension crisis.” 1. Why have governments tended to avoid the problem of pension reform? Why is it harder to avoid the problem in the 21st century? How the demographic changes have created problems for pensions? Governments are worried about the sustainability of current pension schemes as changes in demographics are indicating that these schemes will not be able to sustain themselves in a few years time. Fertility rates heavily increased in the post World War II period (1960 a representative year) and decreased subsequently, creating the “baby boom”, which has been an important factor in the 21st century population aging. Current fertility rates are experiencing historic lows; at an European Union (EU ) average 1.58 live births per woman, it is significantly below the level needed to replace the population (2.1) . Such changes have significantly increased the average percentage of EU population aged 65 and over, from 9.6% in 1960 to 16% in 2010, which is expected to increase to 22.6% by 2030 . This statistic shows that increasingly more people will have to be supported by government pensions. In the EU the average life expectancy at birth has risen by 10 years over the last 50 years , which means that pension schemes have to support each member increasingly longer than before. The average old age dependency ratio (OADR) in the EU, which measures the amount of elderly people for every 100 people of working age, has increased from 15% in 1960...

Words: 3299 - Pages: 14

Premium Essay

The Current Situation Facing the British Steel Industry

...‘Porter’s Diamond of National Advantage’. Background: Steel is a vital material in the process of economic expansion and it has been very important for the society, considering that the level of consumption of steel/ capita can be used as an index of the level of social wealth, political and economic stability. The steel industry is closely linked with numerous industrial sectors and it promotes the innovation, growth and employment of the European member states. Although the EU is the second largest producer of steel in the world after China its goal is to increase the market share of GDP by 20% in 2020. The British Steel industry is necessary tool, without which, the manufacturing success would not have happened. In 1972, the steel production level has reached an all-time peak of 28 Mt (million tonnes) per year and offered more than twice as many jobs as it does now. Referencing back to Michael Porter’s Book, ‘The Competitive Advantage of Nations ‘, in year 1945, there were 50 mills of steel all throughout UK and it has been reduced to 7 in 1970. Following this, the decision to privatise the British Steel Industry was taken by Margaret Thatcher in 1988, however, since 1990, the real value of the industry has fallen by 24% and it does not seem to be getting better. Following the Financial Crisis of 2008, the production of British Steel decreased to less than 10mt/year and suffered a gradual decline until 2015 where it has increased slightly to 12mt, creating a ‘national steel crisis’...

Words: 2646 - Pages: 11