In the moment, a man cannot see the whole picture, for this reason, historians are used. History specialists are useful to think back on the past and offer the world some assistance with learning from past mistakes. History specialists compose Secondary sources to help the average person understand history. World War One has been dissected by numerous Historians through-out the years since the Great War. There are numerous suppositions and truths that become possibly the most important factor while breaking down secondary sources. By using Secondary sources, the past becomes more clear. Various historians, for instance, James Joll, Fritz Fischer, and Arno J. Mayer composed articles contending their opinions concerning the reasons for the war. …show more content…
Fischer wrote about the political disputes going on in Austria-Hungary in 1914. He also discussed the conversation between Tschirchsky and Berchtold. “As the minister knows, Germany repeatedly had announced during the crisis that with regard to the Balkan policy, it would always stand behind us.” He discussed how only forceful activity against Serbia would bring achievement and success. On July 2, Franz Joseph composed a letter to Wilhelm II expressing his goals to exterminate Serbia as a political force. The arrangement was to segregate and diminish Serbia in size. The new Balkan Policy was put into effect for the Triple Alliance. The new approach did not indicate any particular proposition for a war between Austria-Hungary and Serbia, although the record incorporated an announcement about the attempt to diminish Russia's impact in the Balkans by including Bulgaria into the Triple Alliance. Numerous different nations were impacted by this segment in the Balkan Policy. Fischer also talked about the Crisis in Berlin on the 29th and 30th of July. After Austria declared war on Serbia, Petersburg started proposing threats “That Russia could not possibly accept the Austrian provocations with equanimity… The War Ministry urged that the critical gain in time should not be wasted, and insisted that a state of imminent war should be declared …show more content…
Mayer was a professor at Harvard University, Wesleyan University, and Princeton University. He is a prestigious Historian and is most famous for his work Political Origins of the New Diplomacy (1967). He wrote “The Primacy of Domestic Politics”. He begins by explaining the point of view of other Historians on the subject of World War One. He says “They do not question or criticize the balancing-of-power system or process as such. Instead, they tilt their lances at four developments that complicated, if not obstructed, its smooth operation.” This is the reason Arno J. Mayer makes the best argument. He addresses alternate sides of the contention. This offers him some assistance with building a strong case on the grounds that, he addresses the other side of the argument. He goes ahead to discuss Domestic Politics stating that the foreign policy is under crucial conditions. The war was no coincidence. Mayer then discusses the politics of the foreign-policy. The government advertised super-patriotism. They did not reveal the depths of the war. The citizens in the long run got some answers concerning the conditions of the war and they were furious! “The foreign offices, the diplomatic corps, the ministry of the interior and in most cases the church.” Were all involved and threatened by the