Free Essay

Xcrtzuurttrrrrtertz

In:

Submitted By tuxraver
Words 4231
Pages 17
[pic]
Web Services Security Kerberos Token Profile Version 1.1.1

OASIS Standard

18 May 2012

Specification URIs
This version: http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss-m/wss/v1.1.1/os/wss-KerberosTokenProfile-v1.1.1-os.doc (Authoritative) http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss-m/wss/v1.1.1/os/wss-KerberosTokenProfile-v1.1.1-os.html http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss-m/wss/v1.1.1/os/wss-KerberosTokenProfile-v1.1.1-os.pdf
Previous version: http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss-m/wss/v1.1.1/csd01/wss-KerberosTokenProfile-v1.1.1-csd01.doc (Authoritative) http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss-m/wss/v1.1.1/csd01/wss-KerberosTokenProfile-v1.1.1-csd01.html http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss-m/wss/v1.1.1/csd01/wss-KerberosTokenProfile-v1.1.1-csd01.pdf
Latest version: http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss-m/wss/v1.1.1/wss-KerberosTokenProfile-v1.1.1.doc (Authoritative) http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss-m/wss/v1.1.1/wss-KerberosTokenProfile-v1.1.1.html http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss-m/wss/v1.1.1/wss-KerberosTokenProfile-v1.1.1.pdf
Technical Committee: OASIS Web Services Security Maintenance (WSS-M) TC
Chair:
David Turner (david.turner@microsoft.com), Microsoft
Editors:
Ronald Monzillo (ronald.monzillo@sun.com), Sun Microsystems Chris Kaler (ckaler@microsoft.com), Microsoft Anthony Nadalin (droldsecure@us.ibm.com), IBM Phillip Hallam-Baker (pbaker@verisign.com), Verisign Carlo Milono (cmilono@tibco.com), Tibco
Additional artifacts: This prose specification is one component of a multi-part Work Product which includes: • Web Services Security Kerberos Token Profile Version 1.1.1. http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss-m/wss/v1.1.1/os/wss-KerberosTokenProfile-v1.1.1-os.html. (this document) • Web Services Security Rights Expression Language (REL) Token Profile Version 1.1.1. http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss-m/wss/v1.1.1/os/wss-rel-token-profile-v1.1.1-os.html. • Web Services Security SAML Token Profile Version 1.1.1. http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss-m/wss/v1.1.1/os/wss-SAMLTokenProfile-v1.1.1-os.html. • Web Services Security: SOAP Message Security Version 1.1.1. http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss-m/wss/v1.1.1/os/wss-SOAPMessageSecurity-v1.1.1-os.html. • Web Services Security SOAP Message with Attachments (SwA) Profile Version 1.1.1. http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss-m/wss/v1.1.1/os/wss-SwAProfile-v1.1.1-os.html. • Web Services Security Username Token Profile Version 1.1.1. http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss-m/wss/v1.1.1/os/wss-UsernameTokenProfile-v1.1.1-os.html. • Web Services Security X.509 Certificate Token Profile Version 1.1.1. http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss-m/wss/v1.1.1/os/wss-x509TokenProfile-v1.1.1-os.html. • XML schemas: http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss-m/wss/v1.1.1/os/xsd/
Related work: This specification supersedes: • Web Services Security Kerberos Token Profile 1.1. 01 November 2006. OASIS Standard incorporating Approved Errata. http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/v1.1/wss-v1.1-spec-errata-os-KerberosTokenProfile.htm • Web Services Security Kerberos Token Profile 1.1. 01 November 2006. OASIS Approved Errata. http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/v1.1/wss-v1.1-errata-os-KerberosTokenProfile.htm
Abstract:
This document describes how to use Kerberos [Kerb] tickets (specifically the AP-REQ packet) with the Web Services Security: SOAP Message Security 1.1.1. This document integrates specific error corrections or editorial changes to the preceding specification, within the scope of the Web Services Security and this TC. This document introduces a third digit in the numbering convention where the third digit represents a consolidation of error corrections, bug fixes or editorial formatting changes (e.g., 1.1.1); it does not add any new features beyond those of the base specifications (e.g., 1.1).
Status:
This document was last revised or approved by the membership of OASIS on the above date. The level of approval is also listed above. Check the “Latest version” location noted above for possible later revisions of this document. Technical Committee members should send comments on this specification to the Technical Committee’s email list. Others should send comments to the Technical Committee by using the “Send A Comment” button on the Technical Committee’s web page at http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/wss-m/. For information on whether any patents have been disclosed that may be essential to implementing this specification, and any offers of patent licensing terms, please refer to the Intellectual Property Rights section of the Technical Committee web page (http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/wss-m/ipr.php).
Citation format: When referencing this specification the following citation format should be used: [WSS-Kerberos-Token-Profile-V1.1.1] Web Services Security Kerberos Token Profile Version 1.1.1. 18 May 2012. OASIS Standard. http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss-m/wss/v1.1.1/os/wss-KerberosTokenProfile-v1.1.1-os.html.
Notices

Copyright © OASIS Open 2012. All Rights Reserved.
All capitalized terms in the following text have the meanings assigned to them in the OASIS Intellectual Property Rights Policy (the "OASIS IPR Policy"). The full Policy may be found at the OASIS website.
This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published, and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this section are included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this document itself may not be modified in any way, including by removing the copyright notice or references to OASIS, except as needed for the purpose of developing any document or deliverable produced by an OASIS Technical Committee (in which case the rules applicable to copyrights, as set forth in the OASIS IPR Policy, must be followed) or as required to translate it into languages other than English.
The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be revoked by OASIS or its successors or assigns.
This document and the information contained herein is provided on an "AS IS" basis and OASIS DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY OWNERSHIP RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
OASIS requests that any OASIS Party or any other party that believes it has patent claims that would necessarily be infringed by implementations of this OASIS Committee Specification or OASIS Standard, to notify OASIS TC Administrator and provide an indication of its willingness to grant patent licenses to such patent claims in a manner consistent with the IPR Mode of the OASIS Technical Committee that produced this specification.
OASIS invites any party to contact the OASIS TC Administrator if it is aware of a claim of ownership of any patent claims that would necessarily be infringed by implementations of this specification by a patent holder that is not willing to provide a license to such patent claims in a manner consistent with the IPR Mode of the OASIS Technical Committee that produced this specification. OASIS may include such claims on its website, but disclaims any obligation to do so.
OASIS takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any intellectual property or other rights that might be claimed to pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in this document or the extent to which any license under such rights might or might not be available; neither does it represent that it has made any effort to identify any such rights. Information on OASIS' procedures with respect to rights in any document or deliverable produced by an OASIS Technical Committee can be found on the OASIS website. Copies of claims of rights made available for publication and any assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this OASIS Committee Specification or OASIS Standard, can be obtained from the OASIS TC Administrator. OASIS makes no representation that any information or list of intellectual property rights will at any time be complete, or that any claims in such list are, in fact, Essential Claims.
The name "OASIS" is a trademark of OASIS, the owner and developer of this specification, and should be used only to refer to the organization and its official outputs. OASIS welcomes reference to, and implementation and use of, specifications, while reserving the right to enforce its marks against misleading uses. Please see http://www.oasis-open.org/policies-guidelines/trademark for above guidance.
Table of Contents

1 Introduction 5
2 Notations and Terminology 6 2.1 Notational Conventions 6 2.2 Namespaces 6 2.3 Terminology 7
3 Usage 8 3.1 Processing Model 8 3.2 Attaching Security Tokens 8 3.3 Identifying and Referencing Kerberos Tokens 9 3.4 Authentication 11 3.5 Encryption 11 3.6 Principal Name 11 3.7 Error Codes 11
4 Threat Model and Countermeasures 12
5 References 13
6 Conformance 14
A. Acknowledgements 15
B. Revision History 18

1. Introduction

This specification describes the use of Kerberos [RFC1510] tokens with respect to the WSS: SOAP Message Security specification [WSS].
Specifically, this document defines how to encode Kerberos tickets and attach them to SOAP messages. As well, it specifies how to add signatures and encryption to the SOAP message, in accordance with WSS: SOAP Message Security, which uses and references the Kerberos tokens.
For interoperability concerns, and for some security concerns, the specification is limited to using the AP-REQ packet (service ticket and authenticator) defined by Kerberos as the Kerberos token. This allows a service to authenticate the ticket and interoperate with existing Kerberos implementations.
It should be noted that how the AP-REQ is obtained is out of scope of this specification as are scenarios involving other ticket types and user-to-user interactions.
Note that Sections 2.1, 2.2, all of 3, and indicated parts of 6 are normative. All other sections are non-normative.

Notations and Terminology

This section specifies the notations, namespaces, and terminology used in this specification.

1 Notational Conventions

The keywords "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC2119 [2119].

Namespace URIs (of the general form "some-URI") represent some application-dependent or context-dependent URI as defined in RFC2396 [URI].

This specification is designed to work with the general SOAP [S11, S12] message structure and message processing model, and should be applicable to any version of SOAP. The current SOAP 1.2 namespace URI is used herein to provide detailed examples, but there is no intention to limit the applicability of this specification to a single version of SOAP.

2 Namespaces

The XML namespace [XML-ns] URIs that MUST be used by implementations of this specification are as follows (note that different elements in this specification are from different namespaces):

http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-wssecurity-secext-1.0.xsd http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-wssecurity-utility-1.0.xsd http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/oasis-wss-wssecurity-secext-1.1.xsd
Note that this specification does not introduce new schema elements.
The following namespaces are used in this document:
|Prefix |Namespace |
|S11 |http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/ |
|S12 |http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap-envelope |
|wsse |http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-wssecurity-secext-1.0.xsd |
|wsse11 |http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/oasis-wss-wssecurity-secext-1.1.xsd |
|wsu |http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-wssecurity-utility-1.0.xsd |
|ds |http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig# |
|xenc |http://www.w3.org/2001/04/xmlenc# |

The URLs provided for the wsse and wsu namespaces can be used to obtain the schema files. URI fragments defined in this specification are relative to the following base URI unless otherwise specified: http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/oasis-wss-kerberos-token-profile-1.1 3 Terminology

Readers are presumed to be familiar with the terms in the Internet Security Glossary [ISG].

This specification employs the terminology defined in the WSS: SOAP Message Security Core Specification [WSS].

The following (non-normative) table defines additional acronyms and abbreviations for this document.
|Term |Definition |
|SHA |Secure Hash Algorithm |
|SOAP |Simple Object Access Protocol |
|URI |Uniform Resource Identifier |
|XML |Extensible Markup Language |

Usage

This section describes the profile (specific mechanisms and procedures) for the Kerberos binding of WSS: SOAP Message Security.
Identification: http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/oasis-wss-kerberos-token-profile-1.1

1 Processing Model

The processing model for WSS: SOAP Message Security with Kerberos tokens is no different from that of WSS: SOAP Message Security with other token formats as described in WSS: SOAP Message Security.

2 Attaching Security Tokens

Kerberos tokens are attached to SOAP messages using WSS: SOAP Message Security by using the described in WSS: SOAP Message Security. When using this element, the @ValueType attribute MUST be specified. This specification defines six values for this attribute as defined in the table below:
|URI |Description |
|http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/oasis-wss-kerberos-token-profile-1.1#Kerberos|Kerberos v5 AP-REQ as defined in the Kerberos specification |
|v5_AP_REQ |[Kerb]. This ValueType is used when the ticket is an AP Request.|
|http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/oasis-wss-kerberos-token-profile-1.1#GSS_Kerb|A GSS-API Kerberos V5 mechanism token containing an KRB_AP_REQ |
|erosv5_AP_REQ |message as defined in RFC-1964 [1964], Sec. 1.1 and its |
| |successor RFC-4121 [4121], Sec. 4.1. This ValueType is used when|
| |the ticket is an AP Request (ST + Authenticator). |
|http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/oasis-wss-kerberos-token-profile-1.1#Kerberos|Kerberos v5 AP-REQ as defined in RFC1510. This ValueType is |
|v5_AP_REQ1510 |used when the ticket is an AP Request per RFC1510. |
|http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/oasis-wss-kerberos-token-profile-1.1#GSS_Kerb|A GSS-API Kerberos V5 mechanism token containing an KRB_AP_REQ |
|erosv5_AP_REQ1510 |message as defined in RFC-1964, Sec. 1.1 and its successor |
| |RFC-4121, Sec. 4.1. This ValueType is used when the ticket is an|
| |AP Request |
| |(ST + Authenticator) per RFC1510. |
|http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/oasis-wss-kerberos-token-profile-1.1#Kerberos|Kerberos v5 AP-REQ as defined in RFC4120. This ValueType is |
|v5_AP_REQ4120 |used when the ticket is an AP Request per RFC4120 |
|http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/oasis-wss-kerberos-token-profile-1.1#GSS_Kerb|A GSS-API Kerberos V5 mechanism token containing an KRB_AP_REQ |
|erosv5_AP_REQ4120 |message as defined in RFC-1964, Sec. 1.1 and its successor |
| |RFC-4121, Sec. 4.1. This ValueType is used when the ticket is an|
| |AP Request |
| |(ST + Authenticator) per RFC4120. |

It should be noted that the URIs in the table above also serve as the official URIs identifying the Kerberos tokens defined in this specification.

All token types defined in this section use the type 0x8003 defined in RFC1964 for the checksum field of the authenticator inside the AP_REQ.

The octet sequence of either the GSS-API framed KRB_AP_REQ token or an unwrapped AP_REQ is encoded using the indicated encoding (e.g. base 64) and the result is placed inside of the element.
The following example illustrates a SOAP message with a Kerberos token.

boIBxDCCAcCgAwIBBaEDAgEOogcD... ...

...

3 Identifying and Referencing Kerberos Tokens

A Kerberos Token is referenced by means of the element. This mechanism, defined in WSS: SOAP Message Security, provides different referencing mechanisms. The following list identifies the supported and unsupported mechanisms:
The wsu:Id MAY be specified on the element allowing the token to be directly referenced.
A element MAY be used which specifies the identifier for the Kerberos ticket. This value is computed as the SHA1 of the pre-encoded octets that were used to form the contents of the element. The element contains the encoded form the of the KeyIdentifier which is defined as the base64 encoding of the SHA1 result.
Key Name references MUST NOT be used.
When a Kerberos Token is referenced using the @wsse11:TokenType attribute SHOULD be specified. If the @wsse11:TokenType is specified its value MUST be the URI that identifies the Kerberos token type as defined for a corresponding BinarySecurityToken/@ValueType attribute. The Reference/@ValueType attribute is not required. If specified, its value MUST be equivalent to that of the @wsse11:TokenType attribute..
The element from which the reference is made contains the element. The element MUST have a ValueType attribute on the element with the value #Kerberosv5APREQSHA1 and its contents MUST be the SHA1 of GSS-API framed KRB_AP_REQ token or unwrapped AP-REQ, as appropriate, encoded as per the element’s EncodingType attribute.

|Reference Identifier |ValueType URI |Description |
|Kerberos v5 AP-REQ |http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/oasis-wss-ke|SHA1 of the v5 AP-REQ octets, either GSS-API framed KRB_AP_REQ |
| |rberos-token-profile-1.1#Kerberosv5APREQSHA|token or just the Kerberos AP-REQ. |
| |1 | |

The following example illustrates using ID references to a Kerberos token:

boIBxDCCAcCgAwIBBaEDAgEOogcD... ...

...

...

The AP-REQ packet is included in the initial message to the service, but need not be attached to subsequent messages exchanged between the involved parties. Consequently, the KeyIdentifier reference mechanism SHOULD be used on subsequent exchanges as illustrated in the example below:

...

GbsDt+WmD9XlnUUWbY/nhBveW8I=

...

...

4 Authentication

When a Kerberos ticket is referenced as a signature key, the signature algorithm [DSIG] MUST be a hashed message authentication code.

When a Kerberos ticket is referenced as an encryption key, the encryption algorithm MUST be a symmetric encryption algorithm.

The value of the signature or encryption key is constructed from the value of the Kerberos sub-key when it is present in the authenticator or a session key from the ticket if the sub-key is absent, either by using the Kerberos sub-key or session key directly or using a key derived from that key using a mechanism agreed to by the communicating parties.

5 Encryption

When a Kerberos ticket is referenced as an encryption key, the encryption algorithm MUST be a symmetric encryption algorithm.

The value of the signature or encryption key is constructed from the value of the Kerberos sub-key when it is present in the authenticator or a session key from the ticket if the sub-key is absent, either by using the Kerberos sub-key or session key directly or using a key derived from that key using a mechanism agreed to by the communicating parties..

6 Principal Name

Kerberos principal name definition and mapping of non-Kerberos names to Kerberos V principal names are out of scope of this document.

7 Error Codes

When using Kerberos tokens, it is RECOMMENDED to use the error codes defined in the WSS: SOAP Message Security specification. However, implementations MAY use custom errors, defined in private namespaces if they desire. Care should be taken not to introduce security vulnerabilities in the errors returned.

Threat Model and Countermeasures

The use of Kerberos assertion tokens with WSS: SOAP Message Security introduces no new message-level threats beyond those identified for Kerberos itself or by WSS: SOAP Message Security with other types of security tokens.

One potential threat is that of key re-use. The mechanisms described in WSS: SOAP Message Security can be used to prevent replay of the message; however, it is possible that for some service scopes, there are host security concerns of key hijacking within a Kerberos infrastructure. The use of the AP-REQ and its associated authenticator and sequencer mitigate this threat.

Message alteration and eavesdropping can be addressed by using the integrity and confidentiality mechanisms described in WSS: SOAP Message Security. Replay attacks can be addressed by using message timestamps and caching, as well as other application-specific tracking mechanisms. For Kerberos tokens ownership is verified by use of keys, so man-in-the-middle attacks are generally mitigated.

It is strongly recommended that GSS wrapped AP-REQ be used or that unwrapped AP-REQ be combined with timestamp be used to prevent replay attack.

It is strongly recommended that all relevant and immutable message data be signed to prevent replay attacks.

It should be noted that transport-level security MAY be used to protect the message and the security token in cases where neither a GSS-API framed KRB_AP_REQ token or an unwrapped AP-REQ combined with timestamp and signature are being used.
The last numbered section in the specification must be the Conformance section. Conformance Statements/Clauses go here.

References

The following are normative references [2119] S. Bradner, "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels," RFC 2119, Harvard University, March 1997 [Kerb] J. Kohl and C. Neuman, "The Kerberos Network Authentication Service (V5)," RFC 1510, September 1993, http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1510.txt . [KEYWORDS] S. Bradner, "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels," RFC 2119, Harvard University, March 1997 [S11] W3C Note, "SOAP: Simple Object Access Protocol 1.1," 08 May 2000. [S12] W3C Recommendation, "SOAP Version 1.2 Part 1: Messaging Framework", 23 June 2003. [URI] T. Berners-Lee, R. Fielding, L. Masinter, "Uniform Resource Identifiers (URI): Generic Syntax," RFC 3986, MIT/LCS, Day Software, Adobe Systems, January 2005. [WSS] Web Services Security: SOAP Message Security Version 1.1.1. 18 May 2012. OASIS Standard. http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss-m/wss/v1.1.1/os/wss-SOAPMessageSecurity-v1.1.1-os.html. [1964] J. Linn , The Kerberos Version 5 GSS-API Mechanism, RFC 1964, June 1996. [4121] L, Zhu, K. Jaganathan, S. Hartman, The Kerberos Version 5 Generic Security Service Application Program Interface (GSS-API) Mechanism: Version 2, RFC 4121, July 2005.
The following are non-normative references [ISG] Informational RFC 2828, "Internet Security Glossary," May 2000. [XML-ns] W3C Recommendation, "Namespaces in XML," 14 January 1999. [DSIG] D. Eastlake, J. R., D. Solo, M. Bartel, J. Boyer , B. Fox , E. Simon. XML-Signature Syntax and Processing, W3C Recommendation, 12 February 2002. http://www.w3.org/TR/xmldsig-core/.

Conformance

An implementation conforms to this specification if it meets the requirements in Sections 2.1, 2.2 and 3.

A. Acknowledgements
The following individuals have participated in the creation of this specification and are gratefully acknowledged:
Participants:
Current Contributors:
|Tom |Rutt |Fujitsu Limited |
|Jacques |Durand |Fujitsu Limited |
|Calvin |Powers |IBM |
|Kelvin |Lawrence |IBM |
|Michael |McIntosh |Individual |
|Thomas |Hardjono |M.I.T. |
|David |Turner |Microsoft Corporation |
|Anthony |Nadalin |Microsoft Corporation |
|Monica |Martin |Microsoft Corporation |
|Marc |Goodner |Microsoft Corporation |
|Peter |Davis |Neustar |
|Hal |Lockhart |Oracle Corporation |
|Rich |Levinson |Oracle Corporation |
|Anil |Saldhana |Red Hat |
|Martin |Raepple |SAP AG |
|Federico |Rossini |Telecom Italia S.p.a. |
|Carlo |Milono |TIBCO Software Inc. |
|Don |Adams |TIBCO Software Inc. |
|Jerry |Smith |US Department of Defense (DoD) |

Previous Contributors:
|Michael |Hu |Actional |
|Maneesh |Sahu |Actional |
|Duane |Nickull |Adobe Systems |
|Gene |Thurston |AmberPoint |
|Frank |Siebenlist |Argonne National Laboratory |
|Hal |Lockhart |BEA Systems |
|Denis |Pilipchuk |BEA Systems |
|Corinna |Witt |BEA Systems |
|Steve |Anderson |BMC Software |
|Rich |Levinson |Computer Associates |
|Thomas |DeMartini |ContentGuard |
|Merlin |Hughes |Cybertrust |
|Dale |Moberg |Cyclone Commerce |
|Rich |Salz |Datapower |
|Sam |Wei |EMC |
|Dana S. |Kaufman |Forum Systems |
|Toshihiro |Nishimura |Fujitsu |
|Kefeng |Chen |GeoTrust |
|Irving |Reid |Hewlett-Packard |
|Kojiro |Nakayama |Hitachi |
|Paula |Austel |IBM |
|Derek |Fu |IBM |
|Maryann |Hondo |IBM |
|Kelvin |Lawrence |IBM |
|Michael |McIntosh |IBM |
|Anthony |Nadalin |IBM |
|Nataraj |Nagaratnam |IBM |
|Bruce |Rich |IBM |
|Ron |Williams |IBM |
|Don |Flinn |Individual |
|Kate |Cherry |Lockheed Martin |
|Paul |Cotton |Microsoft |
|Vijay |Gajjala |Microsoft |
|Martin |Gudgin |Microsoft |
|Chris |Kaler |Microsoft |
|Frederick |Hirsch |Nokia |
|Abbie |Barbir |Nortel |
|Prateek |Mishra |Oracle |
|Vamsi |Motukuru |Oracle |
|Ramana |Turlapi |Oracle |
|Ben |Hammond |RSA Security |
|Rob |Philpott |RSA Security |
|Blake |Dournaee |Sarvega |
|Sundeep |Peechu |Sarvega |
|Coumara |Radja |Sarvega |
|Pete |Wenzel |SeeBeyond |
|Manveen |Kaur |Sun Microsystems |
|Ronald |Monzillo |Sun Microsystems |
|Jan |Alexander |Systinet |
|Symon |Chang |TIBCO Software |
|John |Weiland |US Navy |
|Hans |Granqvist |VeriSign |
|Phillip |Hallam-Baker |VeriSign |
|Hemma |Prafullchandra |VeriSign |

|Peter |Dapkus |BEA |
|Guillermo |Lao |ContentGuard |
|TJ |Pannu |ContentGuard |
|Xin |Wang |ContentGuard |
|Shawn |Sharp |Cyclone Commerce |
|Ganesh |Vaideeswaran |Documentum |
|Tim |Moses |Entrust |
|Carolina |Canales-Valenzuela |Ericsson |
|Tom |Rutt |Fujitsu |
|Yutaka |Kudo |Hitachi |
|Jason |Rouault |HP |
|Bob |Blakley |IBM |
|Joel |Farrell |IBM |
|Satoshi |Hada |IBM |
|Hiroshi |Maruyama |IBM |
|David |Melgar |IBM |
|Kent |Tamura |IBM |
|Wayne |Vicknair |IBM |
|Phil |Griffin |Individual |
|Mark |Hayes |Individual |
|John |Hughes |Individual |
|Peter |Rostin |Individual |
|Davanum |Srinivas |Individual |
|Bob |Morgan |Individual/Internet2 |
|Bob |Atkinson |Microsoft |
|Keith |Ballinger |Microsoft |
|Allen |Brown |Microsoft |
|Giovanni |Della-Libera |Microsoft |
|Alan |Geller |Microsoft |
|Johannes |Klein |Microsoft |

B. Revision History

|Revision |Date |Editor |Changes Made |
|WD01 |17-January-2011 |Carlo Milono |Corrected/added hyperlinks where missing; added Status |
| | | |section |
|WD02 |8-February-2011 |Carlo Milono |Added Related Work to reflect v1.1.1 of the specs; |
| | | |changed References for SOAP Message Security to reflect|
| | | |v1.1.1; Changed WD# to 2; Added Date; Changed the |
| | | |Acknowledgements from Participants to reflect them as |
| | | |Current Contributors and Previous Contributors |
|WD03 |16-March-2011 |David Turner |Corrected and updated links |
|CSD01 |2-May-2011 |TC Admin |Generated from WD03 |
|CSD02-draft |16-May-11 |David Turner |Added conformance statement and corrected a few |
| | | |formatting issues. |

[pic]

Similar Documents