APPENDIX 1 Scrip Name | Amount Invested | Buy Price | Date of Purchase | Sell Price | Date of Sale | % Gain | Actual Gain | Amount retrieved | ARVIND MILLS | 5,000,000 | 8.15 | 10-Aug-01 | 8.85 | 20-Dec-01 | 8.59% | 429,448 | 5,429,448 | RAYMOND | 5,000,000 | 84.5 | 3-Sep-01 | 100.7 | 4-Mar-02 | 19.17% | 958,580 | 5,958,580 | HLL | 5,000,000 | 192.05 | 26-Sep-01 | 232.85 | 19-Mar-02 | 21.24% | 1,062,223 | 6,062,223 | TATA TEA | 5,000,000 | 126.6 | 27-Sep-01 | 170.9 | 27-Mar-02 | 34.99%
Words: 1991 - Pages: 8
Reliance Communications Limited Reliance Communications Limited Date of Listing (NSE) : 06-Mar-2006 Face Value : 5.00 ISIN : INE330H01018 Industry : TELECOMMUNICATION - SERVICES Constituent Indices : CNX 500,CNX Infrastructure,NIFTY,CNX 100 Issued Cap. : 2064026881(shares) as on 10-Aug-2010 Market Cap. : Rs. 36099.83(Cr) as on 10-Aug-2010 Impact Cost: 0.08 as on Jul-2010 52 week high/low price : 321.00/131.50 Ex-Date Purpose 16-Sep-2009 : Annual General Meeting 04-Aug-2009
Words: 565 - Pages: 3
CaseCase Study on FEMA RBI slapped Rs.125 crore on Reliance Infrastructure: The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has asked the Anil Dhirubhai Ambani Group firm, Reliance Infrastructure (earlier, Reliance Energy), to pay just under Rs 125 crore as compounding fees for parking its foreign loan proceeds worth $300 million with its mutual fund in India for 315 days, and then repatriating the money abroad to a joint venture company. These actions, according to an RBI order, violated various provisions of
Words: 830 - Pages: 4
required to sell a person a car just because that person underwent some difficulty to get to the dealership. Generally, ads are not offers but invitations for offers. Although Betty might argue that she relied to her detriment (the doctrine of detrimental reliance) on the ad, the fact that Betty underwent some hardship to make her offer to purchase the truck does not obligate the dealership to accept her offer. When Tony said over the phone "three thousand dollars firm," was he making an offer that
Words: 417 - Pages: 2
Contracts 613 MIDTERM EXAMINATION Contracts 613 Issue: Valid Contract Betty v. Art Formation For there to be a contract, there must be an offer, acceptance and consideration. Offer An offer the present outward manifestation of intent to be bound by contractual agreement requiring definite and certain terms and is communicated to the offeree. When Betty asked Art on what terms he would build a barn on her property was a present outward manifestation. Here Art responded that he had never
Words: 2868 - Pages: 12
FORMATION OF CONTRACT FORMATION OF CONTRACT 1. INTENTION to create legal relations Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co ‘Test’ of intention (I) to determine if agreement between parties were intended to have contractual force Edmonds v Lawson Domestic Agreement (NI) btwn close family members are not legally binding Balfour v Balfour Cohen v Cohen Domestic Agreement (I) with additional circumstances Merritt v Merritt Wakeling v Ripley Agreement btwn friends/ to provide charitable services
Words: 3107 - Pages: 13
Legal Writing Assignment #3 Please carefully follow the below instructions: This assignment should be taken under exam conditions (one-hour time limit, closed book, no smoking). The assigned essay question should be taken at one sitting. Please write your answer in the IRAC format. Your assignment will be evaluated and critiqued. You will receive your personal feedback on your assignment within 14 days. Edward is a licensed physician. One of his patients was an elderly man named Winston
Words: 1551 - Pages: 7
Theory to Practice: The GCI/Armstrong Press Scenario Daniel Ilario LAW/421 February 24, 2014 G. Alan Williams Is Armstrong’s addition of the delivery term binding on GCI? Explain the UCC analysis governing the additional terms added by Armstrong: Yes it is likely that Armstong’s modification of terms would be binding upon Graphic Communications, Inc. (GCI). UCC articles 7-2 through 7-4 speak to contract modifications. Article 7-2 stipulates that modifications are acceptable and normal in
Words: 1634 - Pages: 7
A dealership is not required to sell a person a car just because that person had a hard time getting to the dealership. Generally, an ad is not to offer but invitations for offers. Betty might argue that she relied to her the doctrine of detrimental reliance on the ad, the fact that Betty had some hardship to make her offer to purchase the truck does not obligate the dealership to accept her offer. Every business that deals with the general public must be aware of the various laws that have been
Words: 1028 - Pages: 5
provide consideration., exploitation) iv) Are there any valid defences? We don’t want the defendant to suffer as well. The claimant doesn’t necessarily gain back everything. (CHANGE OF POSITION THE DEFENDANT RELIED ON THE ENRICHMENT). Reliance, detrimental reliance, links with estoppel. i.e.: textbook, nightout, books. Instead of buying new textbooks, could have bought 2nd hand. Instead of spending the nightout, could have paid individually. The court only look at the gain you still HAVE. They might
Words: 416 - Pages: 2
