Free Essay

12 Twelve Man

In: People

Submitted By rucanylmz
Words 5325
Pages 22
1

Twelve Angry Men: An Analysis of Group Effectiveness The Infrareds Ruth Bradner, Penelope McFarline, Michelle McGregor, Jonathon West VCU ADLT 612 Dr. Terry Carter, Professor

2 Twelve Angry Men: An Analysis of Group Effectiveness Introduction Twelve men with diverse backgrounds are sequestered in a room and are unable to leave until a decision, a weighty one that will either condemn a young man to death or set him free, is made. The twelve strangers are bound to each other, trapped within the confines of four immovable walls, until the goal is achieved. They melt in the humidity of middle summer, which is exacerbated by the room's stuffiness and by the stress of their task. We, the audience, sweat as they grapple with each other and with the responsibility that is theirs to fulfill. One could spend a great deal of time debating if the jurors who comprised the cast of “Twelve Angry Men” (Lumet, 1957) were a group or a team. One could, and we will, cite definitions and descriptions from the literature to justify one conclusion or the other. The questions that are more interesting to us, and that constitute the thesis of this paper, are these: Were the jurors an effective group (or team)? And what factors contributed to group effectiveness? Schwarz (2002) has proposed a Group Effectiveness Model that provides facilitators who work with dysfunctional groups a road map, a way to identify where groups have gone wrong. Schwarz identifies three criteria for judging group success: performance, personal and process. If what the group produces meets or exceeds expectations (performance); if group members grow and develop through the group experience (personal) and if the group learns to work together (process), then the group has experienced some success. In addition, Schwarz identifies elements that are essential to the group work itself. These are group context, structure and process. In this paper, we will examine the twelve jurors' effectiveness as a group by comparing them against Schwarz's Group Effectiveness Model. Most notably, we will identify the elements of group

3 effectiveness most clearly demonstrated in “Twelve Angry Men” (Lumet, 1957) and measure the group’s success against Schwarz's criteria. In some cases, we will examine Schwarz's elements of group effectiveness from a slightly different angle, a different perspective that references the ideas of notable experts in the field of group dynamics. In particular, we will incorporate the works of Levi (2007) and Smith and Berg (1987). Group Context Group context is defined as the setting in which the group operates and the elements that support its work. In Schwarz's (2002) view, it is important that effective groups have a clearly stated mission; a supportive, broader organizational culture; appropriate rewards; information and feedback; a physical environment conducive to the group work; and other supports such as training, technology and necessary resources. For the purposes of this paper, group context is the category on which we will focus the least, however we do offer the following comments on the context in which the twelve angry jurors operated. Groups operate best when their mission is clear and the members share a vision with the broader organization (Schwarz, 2002). In the case of “Twelve Angry Men” (Lumet, 1957), the broader organization could be considered the U.S. justice system. While there were several instances of involved parties reminding the jury of their goal (the judge reminder before the jury retired for deliberation; the foreman repeated their purpose during deliberation), the jury members clearly struggled to embrace their mission (why do we exist?) and share the vision (how do we look?). As eloquently described by the international juror who had recently become a U.S. citizen, the vision of the American justice system is built upon a jurisprudence tenet that all people deserve a fair trial and are innocent until proven guilty. Most of the jury members

4 were motivated for many reasons to act in a manner inconsistent with the implicit mission and vision, and it was only through group process and development over time that they fully accepted their responsibility associated with that mission. Perhaps by the end of the movie, a shared mission and vision could be articulated. Certainly at the beginning, it could and was not. We would argue that there was little external support provided to the jurors beyond basic instruction on their assignment. Training was not provided prior to the trial and consultation during deliberation goes against the intention of assembling an objective and untainted peer jury. An effective group needs access to valid information in order to perform a task (Schwarz, Davidson, Carlson, and McKinney, 2006). Not only was the jury provided with testimony and evidence with which to deliberate, but the group itself generated a great deal of knowledge based upon pragmatism and experience. This ultimately helped them evaluate the veracity of testimonies. An example of evidence that generated knowledge was the knife: The architect successfully demonstrated the possibility that the murder weapon was not unique, and that another person could have possessed the exact same knife. One of the most powerful scenes was that in which the intellectual had a change of heart once he related his personal experience wearing glasses to the witness who was short-sighted. He realized that it would have been impossible for the witness to verify beyond a shadow of doubt that the defendant had committed murder. The impact of the physical environment is discussed later in the paper. Suffice it to say that the room in which they worked met the needs of the group in many ways. On the other hand, the hot and humid weather had a negative impact on the level of comfort experienced by the group and sometimes served as a catalyst for the already high tensions to explode, at times, into utter ugliness

5 Group Structure In Schwarz's (2002) model, group structure consists of clear mission and goals, shared vision, motivating tasks, appropriate membership, clearly defined roles, group norms, sufficient time, and effective group culture. In “Twelve Angry Men” (Lumet, 1957) the goal of the group was clear, but as we have noted, the group struggled to clarify their mission and failed to articulate a vision for themselves until the movie’s end. For most of the jury, the motivation at the beginning was to complete the task so that they could go home. Over time, as the validity of the evidence became questionable, the motivation of the group changed from this short term and selfish view to a longer term view of providing the defendant a fair trial. Although the members of the jury group were all white men, their backgrounds were quite diverse and this helped to bring different perspectives to the group. While the diversity and different background seemed to contribute toward conflicting views, it also enriched the group with a broader worldview. To this extent, the diversity of the group membership helped make the group more effective in achieving its goal. The jury had been given nearly unlimited time to arrive at their decision. At one point when the vote was split, the group gave itself a time limit to reach their goal before they would declare themselves a hung jury. The abundance of time seemed to help focus the group and provide the space necessary to consider things more deeply. The roles in the jury were not clearly defined and many roles developed informally. The only stated role was that of the foreman, who could be said to be a nominal leader in that he suggested how the group would sit and that there should be a vote from time to time. However, he did little to lead the group explore whether the boy was guilty beyond reasonable doubt. The foreman also became a note taker and sometimes a mediator. At one point he became

6 uncomfortable with this role and tried to pass the responsibility elsewhere but the group rejected it. When the jurors began discussing the case, eleven of them considered the young man to be guilty and one dissented. It was this man, the architect, who first stepped into a leadership role and this happened in an informal manner. In an examination of the group's dialogue, the architect could be considered a facilitative leader of the Skilled Facilitator Approach (Schwarz, 2002). The core values of the Skilled Facilitator Approach are: valid information, free and informed choice, internal commitment, and compassion. The architect sought out valid information for the group to consider, advocated his point of view and inquired as to differing perspectives and additions to the debate. As the story unfolded, more valid information was uncovered by various members of the group and members of the group changed their votes to not guilty. They became quite committed to the architect’s approach and many of them began to share the role of the Skilled Facilitator. Levi (2007) notes that group members can hold various roles within the group, which may create conflict within the individual and the group. Jury members moved between roles of information givers and information seekers. Other examples of multiple roles include: the baseball fan was a critic but became a follower; the little guy with glasses (John Fielder) was inquisitive and a compromiser through most of the film; the immigrant was an information receiver and also reminded the group of the seriousness and significance of their duty as American citizens; the ad man was compromising, the painter was a harmonizer and the bigot remained a critic. The internal conflict experienced by the individuals as they moved from role to role was acted skillfully, and sometimes resulted in extreme displays of emotion and even catharsis when the role change was precipitated by internal struggle.

7 The group norms of the jury evolved as well. In the beginning it was acceptable for group members to harass and denigrate the architect for his vote and questioning. The anger and harshness of the angry man and bigot were tolerated. As the group spent more time together and learned more about each other, they no longer accepted negative or abusive behavior. An example is when the painter told the angry man to respect the old man and threatened to "lay out" (Lumet, 1957) the angry man if he spoke negatively again. Another powerful example of group norms was near the end of the movie when the bigot once again exploded in a prejudicial rant about how "those people" (Lumet) were always negative. At this point, the majority of the group left the table and turned away from the bigot, silently expressing disdain for his behavior. What was once accepted was now shunned. We would like to make one last point about group structure in relationship to the debate over group versus team. Levi (2007) and Schwarz (2002) both use the terms interchangeably. Teams are often classified as specific kinds of groups with special characteristics. For example, Levi cites Forsyth's (1999) definition of teams as groups with common goals, coordinated efforts and mutual accountability. At times, teams are thought of as groups with members that have specific functions, as in sports teams. Levi further cites Hayes’ (1997) emphasis on a team’s power to operate. Given these definitions, we conclude that the twelve jurors perhaps began as a group but ended as a team. It is clear that the group was empowered to make a decision from the beginning--one that the judge, a representative of the judicial system, would accept without question. However, the individuals did not demonstrate a sense of mutual accountability to each other except over time and through dialogue. Mutual accountability for a fair decision and to do right by the defendant was gradually embraced as individuals listened to questioning, contributed to the discussion, and re-evaluated the evidence. Efforts at the beginning of the deliberations

8 were coordinated towards the path of least resistance: an easy guilty verdict. By the end of the session, efforts were coordinated towards a shared group mission and vision. Lastly, each of the individuals contributed a perspective that was unique to his experiences. Once the juror was able to relate his experience to that of the testimony and evidence, he was also able to acknowledge doubt. In this way, the individuals complemented each other such that the team was enriched. Group Process The paradox perspective. Schwarz (2002) proposes that the elements of group process include problem solving, decision making, conflict management, communication and boundary management. Boundary management, decision making and conflict management can be viewed through a lens of a different kind, one that elucidates the paradoxes associated with each. Smith and Berg (1987) describe four paradoxes of belonging. Of these, boundary and identity are closely associated and two that were clearly demonstrated in “Twelve Angry Men” (Lumet, 1957). An understanding of these paradoxes within the context of the movie provides insight into the group's behaviors around boundary management and decision making, and helps us to identify the source of some of their conflict. The concept of boundary can be articulated in both physical and non-physical terms. Smith and Berg (1987) wrote that one of the functions of boundaries is to provide a way to contain group anxiety associated with group membership. The container effect is heightened when the boundaries are rigid and impermeable. In the movie, the physical container was the room in which the twelve jurors deliberated and ultimately decided the fate of the defendant. The invisible container was the work assigned to the group: to achieve a unanimous decision of guilt or innocence. The clearly defined group mission represents a rather unyielding container for the

9 anxiety of the twelve men: in order to achieve the group goal successfully, each individual had to weigh a great deal of information (evidence) and come to a decision of guilt or innocence; the group had to reconcile the differences between individuals and come to a unanimous conclusion of guilt or innocence. Achieving the group decision was the only way out for the group both physically (of the room) and metaphorically (of the group and its task), unless a hung jury was declared. Because the physical and non-physical boundaries of the group were so impermeable, with few safety valves to release the anxieties associated with the task of the jurors, we observed extreme emotions of men under a lot of pressure, symbolized in one way by the very angry and threatening character played by Lee J. Cobb. When boundaries are too rigid, the group is at risk of exploding because there are few valves or vents to release individual anxieties associated with group membership (Smith and Berg, 1987). Throughout the movie, we observed individuals looking for a way to escape both their physical and non physical containers quickly. The group could have negotiated such an escape through a quick conclusion of guilt. Thus, we observed the baseball aficionado pushing the group to a unanimous guilty vote so that he wouldn't miss his baseball game, the intellectual using factual evidence to rationalize why the defendant deserved a conclusion of guilt, and the bigot using his prejudice to justify that the youth has a guilty verdict coming to him. Herein lies the paradox of boundaries and the experience of the twelve angry men: the physical and nonphysical boundaries of both the group location and the group mission were nearly suffocating in the lack of flexibility and permeability, and elicited a great many escape attempts by its members; but those boundaries were ultimately necessary in order for the group to learn to work together and to accomplish its most difficult task.

10 The jurors may well have exploded or imploded under the weight of their own anxiety if not for some relief, which primarily occurred in two ways: retreat to the bathroom or move away from the table, which was the focal point of debate. The bathroom symbolized a quiet refuge from the anxieties of the group and this was observed at the beginning of the movie, when the old man delayed the group deliberation. In another scene, the bathroom became the place that some individuals attempted to influence the decision of Henry Fonda, the deviant and most resistant to the group norms and direction. Jurors moved away from the table and looked out the windows, which were also symbolic windows to freedom. Henry Fonda's character pensively looked out the windows as the movie opened; Lee J. Cobb's angry character spoke to the group while looking out the window at the end of the movie before he finally acquiesced and declared the defendant's innocence. Ironically, the very anxieties that group boundaries contain are manifestations of the individual's struggle within him or herself as much as they are the result of conflicts between group members. This struggle speaks to the paradox of identity. An individual's identity within a group is often experienced as what he or she will need to give up in order to belong; conversely, the group speculates if it can accomplish its task with the current membership (Smith and Berg, 1987). Thus, individuals seek groups that will not force them to overly compromise their identities and groups seek individuals that will conform and contribute maximally to the group. Group norms are one way that groups establish identities and keep individuals working towards the good of the group. We have already discussed some of the group norms that kept the jurors in check. One example of the struggle between group and individual identity occurred within the first ten minutes of the movie, a scene in which Henry Fonda's character offered to sacrifice his

11 uncertainty (which is an expression of individuality) if the rest of the group collectively voted guilty in a second, secret ballot. The old man voted not guilty and the struggle between the group and the non-conforming individuals began in earnest. During the course of the movie, and one by one, the jurors exposed to themselves and the others their biases, pains, tragedies and hidden agendas that drove each of them to initially condemn the defendant. In the process of revealing their true, complex identities, the individuals committed themselves to the real work of the group: to decide guilt or innocence based upon a presumption of innocence unless proven guilty beyond a question of doubt. As individuals allowed themselves to be more authentic, the group became more genuine as well. Herein lies the paradox of identity: while individuals perceive that they must give something up to belong to a group, and groups behave as though individuals must conform in order for them to be good group members, the truth is that the complex process of revealing to the group one's true identity with all its contradictions, and the difficult process for a group to accept behaviors and thinking outside of its norms, causes each to be stronger and to gain insight (Smith and Berg, 1987). At the end of “Twelve Angry Men” (Lumet, 1957), each juror gained knowledge about himself, the others and the nature of groups as a result of wrestling with the contradictions and complexities of the decision they had to make The group development perspective. Group process can also be viewed from the perspective of group development theory. The Tuckman model (as cited in Levi, 2007) is a stage development model and is one way in which to view the maturation process that the jurors experienced. Tuckman proposed that groups go through four stages and since his original proposal, a fifth one has been added. These stages are forming, storming, norming, performing and now adjourning.

12 The first stage, forming, began when most of the members of the group tried to get to know each other by briefly chatting about the case, the view of the building, and the surprise of the locked door. The men were polite with one another; for instance, the baseball fan offered chewing gum to two of the members and offered to help open a window. Moreover, there was a sense of being uncomfortable and constrained, demonstrated by the architect who separated himself from the others as well as the jurors who sat silent and did not engage in small talk. The socialization of the group began during the forming stage. Socialization is an important component of groups, helping to crystallize the group norms and to develop connections. Socialization is the process by which individuals begin to understand their relationship to the group and the group’s relationship to others. Levi (2007) defines social identification as the group identity as a whole existing on their own, an “us versus them” mentality. Social representation is the shared beliefs within the group on how they see the world around them. Most in the group initially felt bound together against the defendant, superior to the individual on trial. Via raising the question of doubt and rejecting what appeared to be irrefutable evidence, individuals in the group accepted the ambiguity of the case and at least some of them became more empathetic to the defendant. Levi (2007) writes that socialization is a process starting with an individual questioning, evaluating and then deciding whether or not to join the group. Each of the jurors did just that, based upon his differing point of view and life experiences. For example, the Jack Klugman character had grown up in a slum; he was able to identify with the defendant and shared insight on the use of the switch blade. As communication and dialogue amongst members continued, they began to shape each other’s opinions. The group ultimately developed a new perspective of the case that was cultivated through the socialization process.

13 The storming stage, which is depicted by discord and division among members of a group, was observed in the movie when each juror took a turn to explain why he thought the young Puerto Rican man was guilty. This exercise created a division in the group, pitting two jurors against the rest. Hostility between jury members ensued: The architect defended the possibility of the boy’s innocence and the bigot said, “Oh boy, there’s always one” (Lumet, 1957). Another example came after the secret ballot revealed a second not guilty vote and the angry man said, “Why don’t you drop a coin in this collection box” (Lumet) in reference to the man born in a slum. He had mistakenly assumed that Jack Klugman's character had voted not guilty. More disagreements over procedures were noticed when the bigot wanted the architect to talk out of turn in direct contradiction to a group agreement. There was confusion of roles, as demonstrated when the architect took on the role of enforcer by grabbing a piece of paper that was used to play tic-tac-toe by two people. As the discussion evolved, the group realized that an agreement on the verdict of the case has become more difficult than anticipated. The norming stage is characterized by organization to work together, and was reached when some of the jurors developed rules of order, got the discussion flowing and stated what behavior was acceptable or unacceptable. At the performing stage, in which members are concentrating on the task and make collective decisions, the jurors ruled out every piece of evidence presented and entertained that the eighteen year old man could be innocent. The adjourning or dissolution stage occurred hastily for the twelve jurors. We can surmise that their social relationships were not strong enough to carry outside of the deliberation room.

14 We’d like to offer two different group development perspectives as alternatives to the Tuckman model (as cited in Levi, 2007): the unilateral control model (Schwarz, 2006) and the punctuated equilibrium model (Gersick, 1988). As a part of group process, the theory-in-use of the group initially followed the model of unilateral control. Behaviors of the unilateral control model are to always win and control; to advocate our views; to not inquire about others views; to make negative inferences about others; to ignore that there is a problem and to display defensive behavior (Schwarz). As the group became more cohesive and group norms began to form that supported a more open and curious stance, the jury began to demonstrate mutual learning behaviors. Mutual learning is characterized by behavior that provides data to support ideas, inviting inquiry, being open to rigorous testing of theories, the possibility of conflict, and low defensive behavior (Schwarz). Evidence of the unilateral control model can be found in the behavior of the angry man and the bigot. The angry man often acted as if it was a competition and he wanted to win rather than lose. He was not really open or curious about different viewpoints and often made negative inferences about others when they expressed a view contrary to his own. An example was when the old man on the jury began to question the motives of the old man who testified. The angry man yelled at him and put him down. The bigot also often made negative inferences about others and tried to control others and advocate his own view. He also frequently demonstrated defensive behavior. Early in the jury's deliberation, the architect exhibited behaviors of the mutual learning model. At the very outset he said that he wasn't sure the boy was guilty and wanted to hear what the others thought. Often when he presented information, he said he wasn't sure about the outcome, but that the points he presented led to his doubt about the guilt of the boy. He had low

15 defensive behavior and often inquired into the other jurors reasoning and intent. He focused on his interest of not being convinced beyond a reasonable doubt and was not really fixed on any position. He just wanted to talk about the evidence presented and reexamine it. He also advocated his ideas and inquired about what others thought about them and invited them to share their thinking. The mutual learning behavior of the architect provided a model for others in the group to follow and gradually the group began to demonstrate mutual learning behaviors and work more effectively. A second alternative theory of group development exhibited in the movie is the punctuated equilibrium model proposed by Gersick in 1988. This model explores how groups work over time and suggests that groups work in phases. The punctuated equilibrium paradigm suggests that "systems progress through an alternation of stasis and sudden appearance -- long periods of inertia, punctuated by concentrated, revolutionary periods of quantum change" (Gersick, 1988, p. 16). Gersick's study found that groups demonstrate a distinguishing approach at its first meeting and then stays with this approach through a period of inertia (tending to stay in the same condition) for about half of the time of the given deadline. There is then a major transition period where groups discontinue old patterns, connect again with outside managers, develop new perspectives on their work, and make remarkable progress. The behaviors of the jury in “Twelve Angry Men” (Lumet, 1957) supports the theory of punctuated equilibrium. The jury's deliberation which found the boy guilty eleven votes to one set the tone for the first half of the movie. The not guilty vote by the architect and the resulting frustration and anger of the group set the tone for a long period of stasis. During this time, the majority were still quite fixed in their guilty verdict and not very open or willing to consider other points of view. The only other not guilty vote during the first half of the film was the old

16 man and he did this to support the architect's resolve to talk it out before making such a serious decision. A significant transition took place when the old man supported the architect's questioning of the validity of the testimony. At this point the discussion the man from the slum, played by Jack Klugman, changed his vote. This was right at the midpoint of the movie and soon after this the tone of the conversation of the group began to change markedly. The unwillingness to consider other viewpoints and anger towards the architect that characterized the first half of the deliberation shifted gradually to a process predominated by a more curious approach that sought valid information. Following the midpoint transition, the second phase was marked by more skillful dialogue and genuine curiosity. The group moved towards a firmer conviction that the boy was not guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Ultimately, even the most recalcitrant of the jurors changed their views when either the validity of the evidence was shown to be questionable (the intellectual) or their strong personal biases were so exposed that they were no longer valid reasons to maintain a guilty vote. Conclusion In examining the group dynamics of the jury in “Twelve Angry Men” (Lumet, 1957), there are many characteristics of groups and teams that become evident. Based on the Group Effectiveness Model (Schwarz, 2002), we judge the jury to be an effective group. The three criteria of an effective group are performance, process and personal. In considering performance, the jury met or exceeded the expectations of the judge and the U.S. judicial system: They arrived at a unanimous decision and helped provide the defendant with a fair trial. Regarding process, the jury learned to work together over time, developing group norms and eventually

17 engaging in skilled dialogue and behaviors of the mutual learning model. We further assert that the jury members began as a group, with no mutual accountability to each other and for accomplishing their mission; and finished as a team with a shared and noble mission and group identity. Finally, when considering personal growth, the individuals in the group learned about biases, pain and experiences that stood in the way of conducting the work they were tasked to do. Ultimately each was able to put aside his selfish motivation and damaging perspectives and engage in objective and fair deliberations as a member of the group. Other factors of the Group Effectiveness Model were also demonstrated through group structure and group process. Of these a clear goal, information, the evolution of group norms, group development, the facilitative leadership of the architect, the method of decision making, communication, problem solving and boundary management were most prominent as evidence of an effective group. When considering the development of the group, there is evidence of both Tuckman’s model (as cited in Levi, 2007) as well as Gersick’s (1988) model of punctuated equilibrium. Their social relationship evolved which led to a more cohesive group at least for the time they were conducting their work. At the same time, their problem solving approach evolved into a method by which the group discovered valid information, freely made their choices and were internally committed to the conclusion. While the jury of “Twelve Angry Men” (Lumet, 1957) ultimately developed into an effective group, this occurred almost despite themselves. These men would have benefited from an understanding of Schwarz's (2002) Group Development Model, Tuckman's stage model (as cited in Levi, 2007), and Gersick’s (1988) punctuated equilibrium model. The twelve angry men may have been just a tad bit happier with such knowledge at their disposal.

18 References Gersick, C. (1988). Time and transition in work teams: Toward a new model of group development. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 9-41. Levi, D. (2007). Group dynamics for teams (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Lumet, S. (Director). (1957). Twelve angry men [motion picture]. USA: Orion-Nova Productions. Schwarz, R. (2002). The skilled facilitator: A comprehensive resource for consultants, facilitators, managers, trainers, and coaches (2nd ed.). San Fransisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Schwarz, R., Davidson, A., Carlson, P. & McKinney. S. (2005). The skilled facilitator fieldbook: Tips, tools and tested methods for consultants, facilitators, managers, trainers, and coaches. San Fransisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Schwarz, R. (2006). Does your leadership reduce Learning? Leader to Leader, Winter, 40-47. Smith, K. K., & Berg, D. N. (1987). Paradoxes of group life. San Fransisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

.

.

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Small Group Analysis of ’12 Angry Men’

...Small Group Analysis of ’12 Angry Men’ Interpersonal and Group Dynamics – SOSC 301 Instructor: Mr. Crisp Bryant & Stratton College October 31, 2012 A Small Group Analysis of ’12 Angry Men’ Set in a large U.S. city, in the 1950’s, Twelve men of a jury are sequestered in a room and are unable to leave until a weighty decision is made, one that will either condemn a young man to death or set him free. The twelve strangers are trapped within the confines of the jury room until the goal is achieved. They melt in the hot humidity, which is worsened by the room's stuffiness and by the stress as they grapple with each other and with their responsibility (Lumet,1957). The characters of each of the twelve men was carefully crafted into a particular role within the group dynamics. A complete spectrum of issues among the different characters was developed to add chaos to the group decision-making process. From the bigotry of Juror No.10, to the coldly analytical No.4, each character brought good and bad qualities to the jury room; they all had to be addressed to reach an outcome (Lumet,1957).  At the beginning of the movie, as the twelve men sit down to begin the deliberation process, there is no discussion and they decide to begin by a vote of guilty or not guilty. Eleven of the jurors quickly vote ‘guilty’ and try to leave the room. Nobody even bothers to think what their decision means for the accused. Juror No. 4 is too rigid to change and Juror No. 7 just wants......

Words: 1787 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Taxes

...Witness (3) | Alberto Gonzalez | Albertogonzalez702@yahoo.com | Witness (3) | Nicole Orozco | Ciciangel84@yahoo.com | On May 31, 2014, two 12-year-old girls in Waukesha, Wisconsin allegedly held down and stabbed a 12-year-old classmate 19 times; when questioned later by authorities, they reportedly claimed that they wished to commit a murder as a first step to becoming "proxies" of the Slender Man, having read about it online. One of the girls believed Slender Man watches her, can read minds, and teleport Punishment The girls face up to sixty years in prison if convicted as adults of attempted homicide Or if convicted as juveniles will be incarcerated to age 25 if they are convicted. Defendants: Twelve-Year-old Female Friends Morgan Geyser Anissa Weier Victim: Twelve-Year-old Minor Charged: First Degree- Intentional Homicide Evidence: Blade [ The weapon that was found in one of the girls book bags] Investigator Reports after being attained iPad Information regarding the plan that the girls wrote beforehand Possible Witnesses Creator of Slender Man Website Creater of Horror Stories Child Pschologist Teacher Investigator Bicyclist that found the victim. Related Cases to Slenderman A week after two 12-year-old Wisconsin girls allegedly stabbed their friend 19 times to honor Slender Man, more real-life connections to the spooky character are emerging....

Words: 520 - Pages: 3

Free Essay

Smoke Signals

...Alex Narvais English 1302 Professor Hawley 2/10/13 Love and Time Shakespeare’s uses three of his poems to describe love and the passage of time. Sonnets twelve, sixty-four, and seventy-three all share this meaning by Shakespeare. Love comes in to play by explaining to “love well” cause time is not endless. Each poem has its own different plot on time and love. Sonnet sixty-four deals with the speaker telling his loved one that time will soon take them from each other. In Sonnet twelve the speaker is preaching that the only way to defeat time is to procreate. Finally, in Sonnet seventy-three an old man is reflecting on his past life and telling it to a younger man, hoping the young man will understand how quick life goes. The poems all start off with the speakers explaining what they have seen or have been through over their lives. The beginnings to the poems are very emotional and serious. They all use interesting word choice to describe how quick time has gone by. Sonnet twelve begins “When I do count the clock that tells the time, / And see the brave day suck in hideous night (Shakespeare, 1-2).” The word clock was used to explain how the speaker has watched time pass and night fall as his life has gone by so quickly. Sonnet seventy-three begins “ That time of year thou mayst in me behold / When yellow leaves, or none, or few, do hang (Shakespeare, 1-2).” The words behold and hand describe that the speaker is describing his life like the season autumn. The speaker...

Words: 996 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Cost Management

...G U I D E T E A C H E R’S A TEACHER’S GUIDE TO TWELVE YEARS A SLAVE BY SOLOMON NORTHUP bY Jeanne M. McGlInn anD JaMes e. McGlInn 2 A Teacher’s Guide to Twelve Years a Slave by Solomon Northup Table of Contents SYNOPSIS......................................................................................................................................3 ABOUT THE AUTHOR...............................................................................................................3 INTRODUCTION TO THE STUDY GUIDE............................................................................3 MEETING COMMON CORE STANDARDS.............................................................3 THE SLAVE NARRATIVE GENRE...............................................................................3 HISTORICAL OVERVIEW..........................................................................................................4 DURING READING.....................................................................................................................6 SYNTHESIZING DISCUSSION QUESTIONS.......................................................................9 ENRICHMENT ACTIVITIES.......................................................................................................9 ACTIVITIES FOR USING THE FILM ADAPTATION........................................................ 11 ADDITIONAL RESOURCES.....................................................................................

Words: 7281 - Pages: 30

Premium Essay

Twelve Angry Men: Justice Is Served

...Twelve Angry Men: Justice is Served Twelve Angry Men takes you into a day in the lives of twelve jurors in a New York City courthouse. In the hands of the jurors lies the fate of a young man accused of stabbing his father. Throughout the film, the audience becomes familiar with each of the jurors and is quickly introduced to topics at issue such as discrimination, iniquitous motives, and concerns about the American judicial system. As the twelve jurors deliberate to reach a verdict, the film epitomizes the validation and condemnation of the American justice system. There are many responsibilities of a jury: to achieve fair and impartial decision, determine guilt or not guilt, give people voice in the government, and to protect the rights of the accused. In other words, the main point of the jury system is not to provide innocence but eradicating or sustaining reasonable doubt. The presumption of innocence is a key theme in the narrative that reflects one of the distinct characteristics of the American justice system. As much as this film is about lessons of discrimination, fate, and impartiality, it is also a lesson of the American justice system. Although this film demonstrates many imperfections in the court system, as imperfect human beings, perhaps it is necessary that justice call upon such a system. As shown in Twelve Angry Men, the American justice system, although seemingly flawed, works for us imperfect human beings Aside from the opening courtroom scene where...

Words: 2917 - Pages: 12

Premium Essay

Iom Paper

...The movie Twelve Angry Men begins with an eighteen year old boy from the ghetto who is on trial for the murder of his abusive father. A jury of twelve men (the committee) is locked in the deliberation room to decide the fate of this young boy. All evidence is against the boy and a guilty verdict would send him to die in the electric chair. The judge informed the jurors that they are faced with a grave decision and that the court would not entertain any acts of mercy for the boy if found guilty. Even before the deliberation talks begin it is apparent most of the men are certain the boy is guilty. However, when the initial poll is taken Juror #8 (Henry Fonda) registered a shocking not guilty vote. Immediately the room is in uproar. The rest of the jury resents the inconvenient of his decision. After questioning his sanity they hastily decide to humor the juror #8 (Henry Fonda) by agreeing to discuss the trial for one hour. Eventually, as the talks precede juror #8 slowly undermines their confidence by saying that the murder weapon is widely available to anyone, and that the testimony of the key witness is suspect. Gradually they are won over by his arguments and even the most narrow minded of his fellow jurors hesitantly agrees with him. Their verdict is now a solid not guilty. Arriving at a unanimous not guilty verdict does not come easily. The jury encounters many difficulties in learning to communicate and deal with each other. What seems to be a decisive guilty verdict as......

Words: 2817 - Pages: 12

Premium Essay

Education

...published in 1633 in a collection of Herbert's poems entitled The Temple: Sacred Poems and Private Ejaculations. Summary of the Poem .......The speaker of the poem addresses Peace as a person (personification), asking where he dwells. The speaker says he sought Peace in a cave but failed to find him there. Afterward, he sees a rainbow and examines it to find Peace. But the rainbow disappears when the clouds break up. Next, he looks in a garden and beholds a crown imperial, with its downward facing bulbs, and believes Peace is at its roots. But when he digs, he finds only a worm.  .......Later, he meets an elderly clergyman and asks him where to find Peace. The man then tells him a story. .......A prince once lived at Salem (Jerusalem), he says. "He sweetly lived," the man notes, but his enemies took his life. From his grave twelve stalks of wheat grew. This wheat spread throughout the earth after those who ate of it discovered that it contained a special virtue. This virtue could eradicate sin and bring forth "peace and mirth." .......The clergyman says this same wheat grows in his garden. "Take of this grain," the clergyman tells the speaker, and make bread. It is in this bread that peace exists.  .   Text of the Poem Sweet Peace, where dost thou dwell? I humbly crave,1 Let me once know. I sought thee in a secret cave,2 And ask'd, if Peace were there, A...

Words: 1109 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Boston Teah Partty

...Matthew Galvin American Revolution Professor Kelley November 21, 2014 George Roberts Twelves Hewes and the American Revolution In the years leading up to the American Revolution, the city of Boston became a hot bed of colonist rebellion against the British Government. The citizens in Boston, of the Massachusetts Bay Colony, had become fed up with unjustified taxation levied against them by the British. The colonists of Boston also saw it to be problematic that the colonies were subject to British rule, but were not represented in Parliament. In the half-decade prior to the Revolutionary War, the city of Boston hosted two monumental events that rallied the colonists into the direction of independence; the Boston Massacre and the Boston Tea Party. A man named George Roberts Twelve Hewes had the honor of being able to witness and take direct involvement in both the Massacre and the Tea Party. George Roberts Twelve Hewes was born and raised in Massachusetts and saw the development of the Revolution from the perspective of an “everyday” colonist. He was born on August 25th, 1742. Hewes was a shoemaker by trade and was never able to amount an impressive net worth. If anything, it can be argued that Hewes was very much more poverty stricken than anything else. Money never seemed to influence Hewes’s actions; instead George Roberts Twelve Hewes was a man of principal and integrity. Prior to the Revolutionary War, Hewes participated in both the Boston Massacre and Boston Tea......

Words: 3612 - Pages: 15

Premium Essay

Perfect Numbers of the Bible

...Perfect Numbers of the Bible Perfect Numbers of the Bible “As for God His way is perfect.” {2 Samuel 22:31} God is a being of perfect magnitude and we learn of his trials and tribulations through his word, the Bible. The Bible teaches us many things, such as: how to love, accept hurt, forgive one another, and show mercy to others. There are many symbolisms within the Word of God, including the use of numbers. Often in The Bible, the symbolic meaning of a number has more value than that of the exact numerical value. Christians have placed emphasis on four “perfect” numbers within The Bible. The numbers three, seven, ten, and twelve have perfect value in both the Old and New Testaments and further examination will explain their caliber of significant symbolism. “He was buried, and He was raised from the dead on the third day, just as the scriptures said.” {1 Corinthians 15:4 NLT} The number three is the first of four perfect numbers and is referred to as divine perfection. In scripture, the number three represents something of which is complete, authentic, and meaningful. It is often indicative of an important event or moment in time, such as when the Earth was separated from the waters in Genesis 1:9-13. Throughout the Old Testament, the number three is symbolized in various events, such as the following: Abraham’s three day journey to Mt. Moriah in which he was commanded to sacrifice his son {Genesis 22:1-4}, baby Moses was hidden by his mother for three months......

Words: 1234 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Truth About Psychology

...Truth About Psychology There are many scriptures that talk about physical and spiritual healing, but there are none that prescribe the infirm to set out on a self-focused journey of behavior modification, which comes with self-help and psychology based solutions. You have been healed not with rules, steps, behavior modifications, accountability, and fear, but with peace and the power that comes from being fully hidden in Christ and completely filled with the Holy Spirit. You were reborn as a new creation; a race of people never before seen on this Earth. Over and over again, throughout the New Testament, you are given permission to be healed. Jesus died and with Him, your sinful nature died. You are no longer broken, weak or struggling, you have been fully restored and healed. Jesus came to Earth and was the beginning of a new creation. A new being. A race of people that would live for eternity, equipped with the same power, ability and inheritance as Jesus. “The thief comes only to steal and kill and destroy; I have come that they may have life, and have it to the full.” (John 10:10) Verse after verse Jesus explains our new placement in the Kingdom and our new status. (John 10:25-30) Jesus promises us the Holy Spirit to equip us for the same power and good works that he had access to and experienced here on Earth. Once you were placed in Christ and filled with the Holy Spirit, Jesus says in John 14:15-27 that you will keep his commands, you know him,......

Words: 6472 - Pages: 26

Free Essay

History of Judaism

...his cousins Leah the elder daughter and Rachel the younger. At first sight of his cousin Rachel he fell in love, but his uncle would not let him marry her so easy, Jacob have to work for seven years to earn Rachel hand. His uncle had other plans, he tricked Jacob by presented his eldest daughter Leah instead of Rachel for him to wed. Jacob could not stop his love for Rachel so he worked another seven years to marry Rachel. Jacob and his two wives remained in Haran for another six to seven years. It would take his uncle being unfriendly to him, for him to move his wives back to his parents’ home. On their journey back home Jacob happened upon the spot that he seen God. That night as he slept he had a dream that he was wrestling a hooded man. Jacob and the...

Words: 728 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Symbolism of God Father Death

...thirteenth child, a son. The first person he comes to is God. He sees God as unfair and biased toward poor people. He states he does not want him as the godfather because he feels God does not disperse wealth equally; this stems from him being poor and having twelve and now a thirteenth child. As the father comes across the Devil as his next choice, he discredits the Devil by saying “you trick men and lead them astray” (Grimm 12). To speculate on this, the father may have had an experience with the devil himself, or his beliefs may stem from biblical readings. The next possible suitor is Death. The father accepts Death as the god father; Death treats all people equally and does not discriminate. Poor and rich alike are taken without biases by Death. The father thinks this is Hunt 2 the one to be the godfather based on his own opinions of how good, evil, and death are represented. There are several noteworthy symbols in this story. To begin with there is the thirteenth child. Thirteen has been for centuries marked as an unlucky number. Dating back to biblical times at the last supper, where twelve disciples and Jesus sat down to eat and Judas arose to betray Jesus (Guiley). Only twelve were bonded. Judas, because he betrayed Jesus represented sin, rebellion, and subsequently the number thirteen (Elev8). The father may have...

Words: 1204 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Gospel Of Mark Analysis

...He sees Jesus and the demon inside of him begs Jesus to not torture him. Jesus tells him to get out of the man. He asked what the demon’s name was and it said its name was Legion, because it was many demons not just one. They begged him saying, “send us to the pigs; let us enter them” (v. 12). So he then sent the demons into the herd of pigs and they ran away and drowned in the sea. The herdsman saw what happened and ran to tell the people about it, they crowded around to see Jesus and the man who had been possessed and they were afraid and told Jesus to leave. As Jesus was leaving the man who had had the Legion inside of him asked to go with him, but Jesus said no and told him to instead, tell everyone about what he did and how he saved him. Jesus returns to Galilee and he was met by one of the leaders of the church, a man named Jairus. His daughter was sick and he begged Jesus to come with him and heal her. Jesus agreed, and when they went a great crowd followed him. Among the crowd was a woman who had a condition were she had been constantly bleeding for twelve years, this made her ceremonially unclean and not allowed to enter the temple. She thought, “if I touched even his garments, I would be made well” (v. 28). So she reached out and touched Jesus’ robes. Jesus noticed that someone touched him and asked who it was, she...

Words: 2007 - Pages: 9

Free Essay

Four Gospels

...THE FOUR GOSPELS IN PARALLEL 34: Jesus Heals a Leper and Creates much Excitement | 8:2-4 | 1-40-45 | 5:12-16 | | 35: Jesus Heals a Paralytic at Capernaum | 9:2-8 | 2:1-12 | 5:17-26 | | 36: The Call of Matthew (Levi-Son of Alphaeus) | 9:9 | 2:13, 14 | 5:27, 28 | | PART V: FROM SECOND PASSOVER UNTIL THIRD. TIME: ONE YEAR | | | 37: Jesus Heals on the Sabbath Day and Defends His Act | | | | 5:1-47 | 38. Jesus Defends Disciples Who Pluck Grain on the Sabbath | 12:1-8 | 2:23-28 | 6:1-5 | | 39: Jesus Defends Healing a Withered Hand on the Sabbath | 12:9-14 | 3:1-6 | 6:6-11 | | 40: Jesus Heals Multitudes Beside the Sea of Galilee | 12:13-21 | 3:7-12 | | | 41: After Prayer Jesus Selects Twelve Apostles | 10:2-4 | 3:13-19 | 6:12-16 | | 42: The Sermon on the Mount | | | A. Introductory Statement | 5:1-2 | | 6:17-20 | | B. Beatitudes: Promises to Messiah's Subjects | 5:3-12 | | 6:20-26 | | C. Influence and Duties of Messiah's Subjects | 5:13-16 | | | | D. Relation of Messianic Teaching to Old Testament and Traditional Teaching | 5:17-48 | | 6:27-30, 32-36 | | E. Almsgiving, Prayer and Fasting to Be Performed Sincerely, Not Ostentatiously | 6:1-18 | | | | F. Security of Heavenly Treasures Contrasted with Earthly Anxieties | 6:19-34...

Words: 2061 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Personality on Extraversion Essay

...Naomi Chebii American Culture and Film 2nd Essay: 12 Years a Slave 28-09-2015 Ref: Analysis on 12 Years a Slave The film 12 Years a Slave tells the horrific true story of a free black man Solomon Northup, who was dragged, kidnapped and sold into slavery in 1850s America to suffer years of abuse in the Pre-Civil War South. From start to finish, basic facts about the time, the places, the people, and the practices of the day are incorporated, sometimes in excessive detail, into Northup’s story. He speaks with authority on all subjects of his enslavement, naming names and pointing out landmarks along the way. In doing so, he dares skeptics to refute his story, knowing that public record and common knowledge would defend it. The son of an emancipated slave, Northup was born free. He lived, worked, and married in New York, where his family resided. He was a multifaceted laborer and also an accomplished violin player. In 1841, aged 33, he was tricked into leaving his family behind his wife, and two young daughters, by two white con men, who offered him a job as a fiddler in a travelling circus. So he travelled with them to Washington, D.C., where they dragged him and sold him to a slave trader called Burch. Despite having papers showing he was a free man, Solomon was whipped and beaten and subjected into a brutal torture by his new owner. 12 Years a Slave serves as a timeless indictment of the practice of human slavery. As we saw from the film how Northup’s detailing the......

Words: 770 - Pages: 4