History has been an essential pillar point in our society today. As we look back through history, we can observe that the winners of war were the ones to write History. Have we ever wondered about what the losing side might have to say about the exact time period? The “A loyalist Rebuttal to common sense,” by Rev. Charles Inglis presents to us the view of the opposing side of the time period. In the article Ingis states that the “Common sense” by Thomas Paine makes no assimilation or identify any realistic view of the lives of the colonist during the time period.
As Thomas Paine “Common Sense,” intrigues the colonist towards rebellion, Ingis is alarmed by the repercussions of the behaviors and the affects rebellion would have on the country. The major problem that Ingis identifies, is whenever he read the Common Sense is that it all Paine’s main goal is to, “poison their minds …show more content…
Inglis believes that there is no reason for war as many lives would be lost for no reason. He also states that he does not see why they must share blood against each other because they are all Britons. Inglis also states that once they lose England they will be no longer be protect by the world best navy. He also believe that the all the ports along the American coast as the British have the most powerful navy in the world. This blockade can literary cripple down the colonist economy. He feels like with the rebellion they would lose all their