Free Essay

Abusing Self Defense

In: Philosophy and Psychology

Submitted By dkp1995
Words 1933
Pages 8
Abusing Self-Defense Crime Self-defense, a noun defined as the defense of one's person or interests, especially through the use of physical force, which is permitted in certain cases as an answer to a charge of violent crime. When you hear about self-defense some people would think of the Trayvon Martin and George Zimmerman case. While I would love to talk about that case I am here on a different mission, to bring awareness to the abuse of using the self-defense as a reason to kill someone and to analyze it from a sociologically point of view. In the United States of America, under federal law, murder is the unlawful killing of a human being with malice aforethought which will come with fatal consequences if you are found guilty of the killing. So in other words murdering someone is a taboo. Sometime the defendant would pled either not guilty, or guilty, on rare occasion they would pled insanity or self-defense. Self-defense stood out the most for me and it was the Jodi Arias and Travis Alexander case, Was it really self-defense or was it just pure jealousy? To start with, I was channel surfing when I stopped on CNN news channel. Nancy Grace was shouting at someone giving their opinion about something as she always do. I was about to change the channel when I saw a gruesome crime scene photo of a shower filled with blood. I wanted to know more about the bloody shower. Come to find out the shower and the blood in it belongs to Travis Alexander, a Mormon. Travis Alexander was murdered on June 4, 2008 by his ex-girlfriend Jodi Arias in his house. Alexander was stab nearly around 30 times and was shot in the head and his throat had been slit. Travis’s body was left in that shower for five days, decomposing and was later found by his friend. Jodi Arias was suspect for the killing of Travis’s death. Arias had three scenarios she told the cop when she was being investigated she originally told police that she had not been nowhere near Travis on the day of the murder and claimed that the last time she saw Travis Alexander was in April of 2008. Arias then switch her story again and told police that two intruders had broken into Alexander's home, murdering him and attacking her. Two years after her arrest, Arias told police that she killed Alexander in self-defense, claiming that she had been a victim of domestic violence. An overkill for self-defense, I would say. I chose this article to analyze because I had to wonder just what exactly was going on for her to think that the court would think she was defending herself after she stab him over thirty times. This seem interesting to me because you wonder why if it was really self-defense as Arias claim. If it was then why did she change her story up so many times and why didn’t she called the police after she killed, and left him to decompose in his shower. I really want to share my opinion and my sociologically point of view. I keep thinking about how as a woman there are gender cultural rules that we are expected to follow, it is embedded in our DNA. Indeed, in the past women primary goal was to find a husband. Even though now in the modern times women are trying to be more assertive and taken serious in their careers then they were in the past. Popular stories and movies enforce and mirrors social norm for women’s gender rules. For an example any Disney princess movie they all shows women dedicated to have a man in their life and without them they are weak and useless, being with a man is all they think about. Ariel for an example she was willing to give up her voice for legs in order to prove that the prince loved her for her, wrong Ariel didn’t have a voice to speak her mind. So she had to convince him with her body that he loved her, there is no mentally attraction it was only physical attraction. Ursula the bad octopus I believe even told Ariel that a woman’s voice is unless in getting the man you want. So we are teaching our children as little girls that you are nothing without a man, and you shouldn’t talk you should only use your body to please him. Movies like Disney princess movie reinforce our social norms and the gender rule. There are some women empowerment movie out there but the media really doesn’t put that in the spotlight, they put movie like Cinderella and The Little Mermaid. So following Mead role taking rule, as children we learn our social roles starting at childhood, watching Disney movie, as a kid when you use to play “house” the mom was the one stayed home she cooked and clean and the dad was the one who went to work. Therefore the cultural rules for us as women to find a significant other is still superior over all else. So where does Travis Alexander and Jodi Arias fit in this the gender rules, Jodi was an upcoming photographer while she was looking for significant other on her free time. One day at prepaid legal services conference Jodi Arias meet what she said was prince charming Travis Alexander, he was everything she could dream of. Everything was great in Jodi’s eyes until one day Travis broke up with her and wanted to see other people. Travis was Jodi’s dream guy so seeing him with another woman probably destroyed her. As the saying goes hell has no fury like a women scorned, Jodi was heartbroken and wanted to let her anger out. Women are known to being emotion and sensitive. So in Jodi’s mindset she probably felt used and unwanted, hurt by the guy she called prince charming. Travis was a Mormon which is a subculture, he looked at life differently Mormon have a community for themselves. They were total institution if you weren’t a Mormon you were not really accepted in their eyes Mormon cut themselves off from the rest of society unless you wanted to listen to the word and become a Mormon, this is adult socialization. When you become a Mormon you can’t drink tea or coffee because they see that as a drug because you were addicted to something toxic and they believe that their body was something precious and that you have to keep it healthy and strong so you were to suppressed your old self from wanting something so toxic into becoming a Mormon. When Travis met Jodi, she wasn’t a Mormon, she was not part of Travis’s primary group, he never brought her around friends, because she was an out group and was peer pressure by wanting to be in Travis’s primary group to become one of them so she wasn’t an outsider anymore she wanted to be in the in group. The peer pressure of fitting in with the crowd and being something you’re not in order to feel special and not alone is conformist. Jodi felt the pressure of not being a Mormon, she was losing the man of her dream so she did what a typical woman in love would do, she converted and go baptize and became a Mormon. Jodi’s is a prime example of symbolic interaction. Travis like blondes so Jodi dyed her hair blonde she did everything that would make him love her, Travis tells her he can never truly be with her because she is not a Mormon. She changed her hair color she became a Mormon for him. Jodi’s deviance improves group solidarity.
This case became newsworthy because Travis Alexander was a Mormon and every news channel used that as angle, they used hypodermic needle theory one news channel played the agenda setting theory they would praise Travis saying he was this innocent Mormon guy who hooked up with the wrong chick. Basically just telling us because he is a Mormon, he was the innocent one in this situation, that religion is a value to have in this world. Some news channel want to inform us and educate us on what it is like being a Mormon saying that Jodi didn’t fit into the Mormon lifestyle. However you could look at Travis as a sexual deviant who used and emotional abuse Jodi and is ruining how people view Mormons. While I think media just used Travis’s religion just for views and entertainment they don’t really care about him ruining the views of Mormons. As audience we don't notice what the media is actually doing to us, they are making us pick sides between the horrible Mormon and the sweet woman who has corrupted by abuse. That’s how the media plays it out or vice versa with Travis being the down to earth guy and Jodi being psycho. It is basically a minimal effect theory the two-step model the news channel tell us what we want to believe that Travis is the typical man who only use Jodi for sex and when he had enough of her, he tossed her to the side and moved on to the next one and he emotional abuse Jodi calling her out of her name. Travis was the pig who deserve what he got in some people’s eyes. On the other hand Jodi was the psycho girlfriend from hell who couldn’t get over Travis and slash his tires, hacked into his emails and deleted dinner dates from other woman just the typical heartbroken girl. The media plays with our emotion they did and said whatever just so, they could get more views making us pick sides. Yes, maybe Travis is a scrum bag or Jodi was a clingy ex-girlfriend who couldn’t move on. However does that give Jodi the right to play as god and killed Travis? Does it gives the media the right to drag a dead man name into the mud saying he was a monster and so forth?
In closing, the sociological issue at hand is we are too blinded by the gender rule, we are so use to women being weak and fragile that we can’t imagine them harming someone. We need to change our mindset of women, we need to stop thinking that women are these breakable things. Women are not only good for cooking and cleaning, we are capable of doing the same things men can do. Women are not incapable without a man, a woman needs a man as much as a man needs a woman. As women we need to become our own hero we shouldn’t need a man to protect us. However yes a man should protect their wife or girlfriend but they should know that, we are capable of defending ourselves. Jodi shouldn’t abuse the system and say that it was self-defense when she know she was capable of killing Travis Alexander. She thought that people would see her cry on the stand and think she is just emotional woman who was in an emotional abuse relationship and snapped, following the gender rule. However she didn’t have to be there she could have walked away, but she continue to go back Travis she continue to have a sexual relationship with him, 8888888888888`125p689-2zche didn’t want her prince charming with someone else so she killed him. She said it herself she is disgusted with herself and she should be.

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Women the Fighting Generations

...have took the initiative to better themselves; by getting better jobs, promoting to higher positions and little by little moving up in the congress to run for presidency. Women are also beginning to learn about self-defense and are self-reliance to better themselves. I believe the cultural shift of women becoming more aggressive and self-reliant is great because they are less vulnerable, independent and confident in themselves. Woman who take self-defense classes have been in the category of woman that are able to avoid attackers. Jeff Klein the writer of “Watching My Back” writes about an incident where Jeff and his girlfriend ran into a drunk man who tried to provoke them, but turns his attention else where. She tells Klein “I got you back”(82) joking, but yet feels a since of comfort by the notion that she does know self-defense and if ever needed she does not feel vulnerable. I honestly do believe women have the right to take any class that betters themselves. Not only do women feel vulnerable walking down the street, but many women down are assaulted even by just jogging around the neighborhood. In The Beaufort Tribune, one man at knifepoint took her into a wooded area and sexually assaulted her (1). Not only does this should encourage women to take self defense classes. The traumas women go through are not worth Feeling vulnerable is usually why women tend to be protective and tend to change how they view the society, but are becoming more independent. Women......

Words: 808 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Wrwer

...[pic] [pic][pic] ETL201 Selected History Topics for Social Studies Individual Assignment Oral History Name : Masri Kario ( Rico ) Matriculation No. : 020200D24 T. Group No. : 1 Tutor : Dr Ang Cheng Guan Tutorial Day/Time : Monday, 12.30 - 1420 hrs Date of Submission : Saturday, 18th October 2003 [pic] An Institute of Nanyang Technological University [pic] Singapore was once been under the Japanese occupation that lasted for nearly three years. On February 15, 1942, Singapore surrender to the Japanese after realizing that the situation was very bad especially there was a shortage of food and ammunition at the frontline battlefield. Furthermore the Japanese had cut off the water supply from State of Johore. After a meeting held at the Battle Box at Fort Canning, British commanders concluded that there was no other choice but to surrender. At 5 p.m. that day, led by Lieutenant-General Percival and other officials like Brigadier Newbigging, Brigadier Torrance, and Major Wild, made their way to the Ford Factory for the meeting. It was a first time ever meeting of top-ranking officers from both armies. However both had their own agendas like one wanted for an unconditional surrender while the other one wanted to negotiate. It was considered as one of the darkest period in the lives of every Singaporean people then. It was the beginning day that the fate of......

Words: 4599 - Pages: 19

Premium Essay

Blood Bananas

...Blood Bananas Case Introduction Chiquita Brands International is a successful company with a long history that began in 1899 as the United Fruit Company. The company has endured over time through changes in leadership, acquisitions, and process changes to become one of “the big three” banana distributors in the world. While they have become successful; their past has been tarnished by paying bribes to government officials, supporting U.S. coups against smaller nations and exploiting local workers. The company that originally revolutionized the banana trade by using refrigerated ships was now faced with the decision of whether to continue to pay a terrorist organization in Colombia, South America to ensure the safety of their employees, stop payment and face the consequences or sell the business and exit the country. Background The issue at hand is partly the result of the industry itself. Bananas grow best in tropical regions, such as the Caribbean, Central America, Asia and Africa. They are critical cash crop for many of the lesser-developed countries. The banana producing country in question here is Colombia, South America which has a population of over 45M people, the second largest in South America. It has the 4th largest economy in Latin America although the income inequality is prevalent due to very uneven wealth distribution. It is in this environment that paramilitary organizations such as the AUC thrive. According to Fernando Aguirre, a former Chiquita...

Words: 956 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Blood Bananas – Chiquita in Colombia

...Blood Bananas – Chiquita in Colombia Introduction: Banana is a serious and a complicated business when it comes to producing and delivering it to the consumers all around the world. As most of the banana production takes a place in the tropics, the largest consumers are the U.S., the European Union and Japan. Chiquita, Dole and Del Monte who are also known as “the big three” control 60 percent of the global banana trade. Dole was founded in Hawai in 1851 and had reported revenues of US $6.9 billion in 2007, being the largest producer and marketer of high-quality fresh fruits and vegetables. Del Monte is one of the largest and well known producers, distributors and marketers of premium quality, branded food and pert products for U.S. generating US $3.4 billion in net sales in 2007. Chiquita which has been the largest employer in Latin America for many years, was founded 1899 and is known for revolutionizing the banana trade by using refrigerated ships for the first time. In 2007, Chiquita was the leading distributor of bananas In the United States with annual revenues of US $4.7 billion. Chiquita and terrorist ties Chiquita has been known as a rapacious multinational corporation for a long time. Company has been blamed for having farmers work for long hours in dangerous conditions, contaminating water with agrochemicals and harming tropical forests for expansion. Its operations in Colombia have been the most controversial topic for a long time due to the instability...

Words: 1042 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Case Report: Blood Bananas: Chiquita in Colombia

...Summer 2013 Summer 2013 Case Report: Blood Bananas: Chiquita in Colombia BUSA 4980 Chiquita Brands international was founded in 1899 after the merger of United Fruit Company and the Boston Fruit Company. As bananas be came more of a staple in every home so do Chiquita Bananas. Bananas are know to mainly grown in tropical places like Central America, Africa and Southeast Asia. Chiquita decided to have operations out of Colombia. During this time there was turmoil in Colombia and different terror groups form “against the government” & other wealthy people in the country. Some of these groups settled in the areas where Chiquita had facilities. Chiquita run into problems with theses groups around 1997, mainly with FARC (Revolution Armed Forced of Columbia) and AUC. They began to kidnap and kill employees of this company. The terrorist groups began asking for money in turn they would stop harming their employees. For Chiquita this decision to pay the AUC seem to be an easy one because or the lack for government and the lack of laws in place. There are many key issues that lead Chiquita Banana’s decision to pay the terrorist groups the FARC & the AUC. One key issues the increasing demand for bananas in new countries like Russia, China and other countries in the Middle East. Chiquita felt as if it had pressure to obtain and grow in these markets. Along with those new markets, Chiquita had their current demand in established markets like the United States......

Words: 818 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Blood Bananas

...Blood Bananas: Chiquita in Columbia Blood Bananas: Chiquita In Columbia is a difficult case that touches on fundamental questions of ethics and morality while operating a business abroad. It is a case that depicts the challenges faced by a company trying to maintain production and protect its employees while navigating between two very different cultures in a hostile situation. the lines of the ethics and morality are not as straight forward as they seem on the surface, and Chiquita’s management struggles to make decisions that will transcend both cultures’ view of right versus wrong. was one of the largest and growing   fruit company in America who faced a dramatic problem in the 90’s with the AUC, a Colombian paramilitary organization that promoted violence act and considered to be terrorist, what happened was they inquired the fruit company to pay them specific amount of money monthly that was required for their security services as they   claimed! The situation was straightforward, either Chiquita pays for the terrorist Chiquita Brands International and its leaders learned a very hard lesson about paying off terrorist groups to protect their employees. Over the past 25 years, no place has been more perilous for companies than Colombia, a country that is finally beginning to emerge from the effects of civil war and narco-terrorism. In 2004, Chiquita voluntarily revealed to the U.S. Justice Department that one of its Colombian banana subsidiaries had made protection......

Words: 824 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Chiquita Bananas

...I. Time Context – 1997 II. Point of View – Fernando Aguirre, CEO III. Statement of the Problem Symptom: Chiquita Brands International was forced to make protection payments to paramilitary groups in Colombia to keep their workers safe from the group’s violence, which later were found illegal under U.S law. Problem: Chiquita workers are saved but the rest of the country is endangered. IV. Objectives 1. To rebuild the company’s image 2. To protect their employee’s lives and at the same time, to not harm the citizens of Colombia by providing funds for terrorism acts V. Areas of Consideration VI. Outline Alternative Courses of Action (ACA) * Exit the country and relocate their operations from Colombia to a nearby country with similar weather but less of a terrorism ridden culture. * Stay in Latin America but fix their public image through sustainable employment and environmental practices in order rebuild a positive image of the brand. * Draw out from Latin America and increase their market share by focusing in other products. VII. Recommendation Since they’ve already sold their Colombian farms, I think it’s time for them to leave Colombia and rebuild their business in another country that is free from terrorism acts that also offer similar weather conditions as Colombia. They should now pay attention on its Marketing Campaign in order to rebuild a positive image of the brand; Focusing on ethical treatment of workers, sustainable......

Words: 385 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Chiquita: Doomed If We Do, Doomed If We Don't

...subsidiaries, is an international marketer and distributor of bananas and pineapples sold under the Chiquita and other brand names in 70 countries, and packaged salads sold under the Fresh Express and other brand names primarily in the United States. With over twenty six thousand employees across six continents, the banana company faced one of its red hot scandals, right in Columbia. Chiquita admitted that it had been paying for years to the violent, right-wing terrorist organization United Self-Defense Forces of Colombia – an English translation of the Spanish name of the group, "Autodefensas Unidas de Colombia" (commonly known as and referred to hereinafter as the "AUC") in exchange of AUC not giving harm to Chiquita’s employees. The AUC had been designated by the U.S. government as a Foreign Terrorist Organization ("FTO") on Sept. 10, 2001, and these designations made it a federal crime for Chiquita, as a U.S. corporation, to provide money to the AUC. In April 2003, Chiquita made a voluntary self-disclosure to the government of its payments to the AUC, giving rise to this investigation. "Like any criminal enterprise, a terrorist organization needs a funding stream to support its operations. For several years, the AUC terrorist group found one in the payments they demanded from Chiquita Brands International. Thanks to Chiquita's cooperation and this prosecution,...

Words: 1999 - Pages: 8

Free Essay

Price of Bananas

...Banana documentary, “The Price of Bananas,” made this point ever more apparent. I fully believe, as stated in the documentary that Chiquita Bananas was complicit and was willing to accept death to keep the banana operation running. Anyone involved in this decision should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. My first thoughts about this situation and putting myself in the position of Chiquita CEO, I would utilize the Weber model of organizational ethics and/or the Army-Baylor 7 step method for decision making. The first question or principle in the Weber method is the organizational interests take precedence over individual self-interest. I would say the CEO rationalized his decision and thought he was doing this. And given the situation, I do not necessarily think the CEO was making a decision to pay the AUC in a motivation of self-interest. The second principle is individual rights take precedence over organizational interests. This can get a little sticky given Chiquita decided to pay para-military troops millions of dollars. If individual rights were of great concern to the CEO, he probably should have made sure his workers and the working conditions were safe, secure, and healthy. Instead, farming bananas in Columbia is one of the most profitable means because of low income earning. The third principle is community good takes precedence over organizational interests. If the CEO was truly concerned about the community and the people who......

Words: 655 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Child Abuse

...lead a normal life without the thought of the immense pain they had to go through. The victim may have suicidal thoughts or actions, extreme depression, substance abuse, and/or posttraumatic stress disorder. How can a parent, the person who is supposed to wish nothing but the best for their own flesh and blood, corrupt their child’s life in the worst way possible? Therefore, it is only fair that the life of the abuser is taken away just as he/she has taken away the opportunity of a peaceful life of their own child. This action is not only justifiable, but also morally permissible through self-defense. The Declaration of Independence’s definition of "unalienable rights" is that every man has the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Not only does every person possess the right to life, but also the right to enhance their quality of life. Philosopher Thomas Hobbes saw self-defense as a right that was essentially an extension of the right to live. His view was that by acting in violence, or with lethal force towards someone, the perpetrator of the act was forfeiting their right, and it was permissible for the...

Words: 763 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Defense Mechanisms and the Movie Shutter Island

...types of defense mechanisms do we use on a regular basis to avoid reality? How positive are they? Andrew Laeddis is the main character in the movie Shutter Island. He suffers from schizophrenia and many other mental problems. The trigger happened after one day he came back home from work and discovered that his wife had killed his three children. She was mentally ill and felt no remorse for what she just did so Andrew killed her. As a result of such traumatic experience, he unconsciously invented another self, created another story in which someone else had committed his wife’s and his own crime. He even denied having any children. At the end he drives himself crazy, and ends up in a mental institution. It’s also important to mention that he went to war and he had lived traumatic experiences prior to his family’s murder. This is a great example for what is called “’defense mechanisms” and how they affect our lives. Everyday people are faced with problems, traumas, difficulties and emotional (and even physical) pain. The mind, in order to protect itself from pain, usually creates these defense mechanisms such as denial, habit, behavioral changes, isolation of affect, etc. Even though defense mechanisms can be positive for protecting the individual against trauma, they can be extremely destructive in using them without awareness and control. Austrian neurologist Sigmund Freud researched defense......

Words: 363 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Behavioral and Social Cognitive Approaches to Forming Habits

...Behavioral and social/Cognitive Approaches to Forming Habits The habit the individual in question will be discussing is always appearing to be in a postulant or defensive mode (Freud defense mechanism). To address this habit, one will discuss many childhood observations and experiences during a crucial formative time in young life. Reasons for behaviors that resemble actions of one’s father and family are relevant to the forming of behaviors that may require some adjustments because one believes that such adjustments may provide many positive effects in the individual’s life. The individual was brought up in a family life were one was observant of domestic abuse at a very young age and was a victim on many occasions a victim of physical abuse as a pre-teen. One believes many environmental experiences and exposures are relevant to some habits that require adjustment to be more productive and happier in one’s personal life. Habit The habit in question is how easily the individual can become physically aggressive. The individual from an early age saw many exposures to alcoholism, drug, and physical abuse in the forms of uncle’s abusing grandmother and father abusing one’s mother. The individual on many occasions saw these actions and at the age of 12 became a victim. Several years went by, and the victim began to fight back at age 14, and this was a pattern that went on until......

Words: 1455 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Stand Your Ground Rule

...that a person may use deadly force in self-defense without the duty to retreat when faced with a reasonable perceived threat. So what's the problem with this law, it seems that since the shooting of Trayvon Martin this law got put in the spot light, or is it racial profiling. Can the press play a big part on how this law is being criticize or are they using these shooting for rating. Stand your ground rule So what is the stand your ground rule? A “stands your ground” law states that a person may use deadly force in self-defense without the duty to retreat when faced with a reasonable perceived threat. The laws expand on the “Castle doctrine,” which says that a person is protected under the law to use deadly force in self-defense when his or her property or home is being invaded. About sixty percent of the states have some kind of “Castle doctrine” or “stand your ground”. So what’s the problem with this law, it seems that since the shooting of Trayvon Martin this law got put in the spot light. Are we the people abusing this law or are we just ignorant to the law. So is this law case in particular out in the spot light because of a young black man been shot or because the shooting was wrongful. What about Jordan Davis? Did Michael Dunn have the right to shot Jordan Davis in self-defense? Did he deserve to die because of loud music? So here we have a law design to protect you or your home, and Michael Dunn try to justified self-defense at a gas station over some loud......

Words: 1225 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Criminal Justine

...Criminal law Name: Institution: An assault is the act of unlawfully attacking people verbally by abusing or threatening them or forcing them to do things against their will. Assault does not involve contact. Examples of assaults are, threatening to kill or take by word of mouth, through a text or mail or pointing a gun, a knife or any other dangerous object to someone to show the strength of the message. It is sometimes difficult to pursue a case against someone who has abused another verbally, since the terms could meant for protective purposes. Sexual assault involves contact. This is when a person is forced, against her will, to have sex with another person. It is only fair to get a refraining order for a person who has committed assault so that when the persons violate it by hurting the people he threatened, charges of assault and battery are on him (Husak, 2007). Battery, on the other hand, involves contact. This is the unlawful torturing of a person by physically abusing them. The injury must be evident for it to be battery. For example, presence of a burn, a cut or a bullet wound that shows that the battery took place. Unintentional damage to someone is not battery. However, there are instances where battery is justified. If you hurt someone while defending yourself, you will only need enough evidence and proof for the rulings to favor you. In......

Words: 904 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Victimaztion

...TRIALS AND VERDICTS Laura Caudle Introduction to Criminal Justice Professor Karina May 24, 2014 Trials and Verdicts The supreme court of Philippines blocked a move by the defendant to try and pay bail as well as to enter a plea bargain in which he could then buy his freedom and go free without getting a full sentence for his crimes. The defendant in this case was a senior general who had been charged with several graft cases and he is former military comptroller Major General Carlos Garcia. The Supreme Court was the best jurisdiction to take over this case because it has the highest authority to handle cases ion the entire nation of Philippines. As such, it has the ability to preside over cases involving highly influential people and large amounts of money, in which courts with lower authority could be easily corrupt. Moreover, judges in lower courts may be intimidated, or their authority undermined. In this case, the defendant faced charges against the government and as such, the government wanted stricter punishment for theMajor General Carlos Garcia so that he could serve as an example to the rest of the nation for involving in such atrocious crime. According to the Court, the Major General was accused with squandering money from the government during his term in office as the top finance official. During this time, the accused is said to have stolen an a sum of money not less than three hundred million pesos, which is equivalent to $6.99 million, and which...

Words: 938 - Pages: 4