Free Essay

Acca of Impairment Goodwill

In: Business and Management

Submitted By juzteesa
Words 2575
Pages 11
TeCHniCal
THiS aRTiCle diSCuSSeS and SHowS boTH wayS of meaSuRing goodwill following THe aCquiSiTion of a SubSidiaRy, and How eaCH meaSuRemenT of goodwill iS SubjeCT To an impaiRmenT Review.

IMPAIRMENT
RelevanT To aCCa qualifiCaTion papeRS f7 and p2
Required 1 Calculate the goodwill arising on the acquisition of High on a proportionate basis. 2 Calculate the gross goodwill arising on the acquisition of High, ie using the fair value of the NCI. Solution 1 The proportionate goodwill arising is calculated by matching the consideration that the parent has given, with the interest that the parent acquires in the net assets of the subsidiary, to give the goodwill of the subsidiary that is attributable to the parent. Parent’s cost of investment at the fair value of consideration given $500 Less the parent’s share of the fair value of the net assets of the subsidiary acquired (80% x $400) ($320) Goodwill attributable to the parent $180 2 The gross goodwill arising is calculated by matching the fair value of the whole business with the whole fair value of the net assets of the subsidiary to give the whole goodwill of the subsidiary, attributable to both the parent and to the NCI. Parent’s cost of investment at the fair value of consideration given $500 Fair value of the NCI $100 Less the fair value of the net assets of the subsidiary acquired (100% x $400) ($400) Gross goodwill $200 Given a gross goodwill of $200 and a goodwill attributable to the parent of $180, the goodwill attributable to the NCI is the difference of $20. In these examples, goodwill is said to be a premium arising on acquisition. Such goodwill is positive goodwill and accounted for as an intangible Following the revisions to IFRS 3, Business Combinations and IAS 27, Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements in January 2008, there are now two ways of measuring the goodwill that arises on the acquisition of a subsidiary and each has a slightly different impairment process. This article discusses and shows both ways of measuring goodwill following the acquisition of a subsidiary, and how each measurement of goodwill is subject to an impairment review. How to calculate goodwill The traditional measurement of goodwill on the acquisition of a subsidiary is the excess of the fair value of the consideration given by the parent over the parent’s share of the fair value of the net assets acquired. This method can be referred to as the proportionate method. It determines only the goodwill that is attributable to the parent company. The new method of measuring goodwill on the acquisition of the subsidiary is to compare the fair value of the whole of the subsidiary (as represented by the fair value of the consideration given by the parent and the fair value of the non controlling interest) with all of the fair value of the net assets of the subsidiary acquired. This method can be referred to as the gross or full goodwill method. It determines the goodwill that relates to the whole of the subsidiary, ie goodwill that is both attributable to the parent’s interest and the non-controlling interest (NCI). Consider calculating goodwill Borough acquires an 80% interest in the equity shares of High for consideration of $500. The fair value of the net assets of Borough at that date is $400. The fair value of the NCI at that date (ie the fair value of High’s shares not acquired by Borough) is $100.

STudenT aCCounTanT 08/2009
Studying Papers F7 or P2? performance objectives 10 and 11 are linked

asset in the group accounts, and as we shall see be subject to an annual impairment review. In the event that there is a bargain purchase, ie negative goodwill arises, then this is regarded as a profit and immediately recognised in income. basic principles of impairment An asset is impaired when its carrying value exceeds the recoverable amount. The recoverable amount is, in turn, defined as the higher of the fair value less cost to sell and the value in use; where the value in use is the present value of the future cash flows. An impairment review calculation looks like this. This is the net book value, ie the figure that the asset is currently recorded at in the accounts. Impairment review Carrying value of the asset X > Recoverable amount (X)

an aSSeT iS impaiRed wHen iTS CaRRying value exCeedS THe ReCoveRable amounT, wHeRe THe ReCoveRable amounT iS THe HigHeR of THe faiR value leSS CoSTS To Sell and THe value in uSe.

OF GOODWILL
Consider an impairment review A company has an asset that has a carrying value of $800. The asset has not been revalued. The asset is subject to an impairment review. If the asset was sold then it would sell for $610 and there would be associated selling costs of $10. (The fair value less costs to sell of the asset is therefore $600.) The estimate of the present value of the future cash flows to be generated by the asset if it were kept is $750. (This is the value in use of the asset.) Required Determine the outcome of the impairment review. Solution An asset is impaired when its carrying value exceeds the recoverable amount, where the recoverable amount is the higher of the fair value less costs to sell and the value in use. In this case, with a fair value less cost to sell of only $600 and a value in use of $750 it both follows the rules, and makes common sense to minimise losses, that the recoverable amount will be the higher of the two, ie $750. Impairment review Carrying value of the asset Recoverable amount Impairment loss $800 ($750) $50

This is the estimate of how much cash the company thinks it will get from the asset, either by selling it or using it. This loss must be recognised, and the asset written down to the recoverable amount.

Impairment loss

X

The impairment loss must be recorded so that the asset is written down. There is no accounting policy or choice about this. In the event that the recoverable amount had exceeded the recoverable amount then there would be no impairment loss to recognise and as there is no such thing as an impairment gain, no accounting entry would arise.

TeCHniCal

As the asset has never been revalued, the loss has to be charged to income. Impairment losses are non-cash expenses, like depreciation, so in the cash flow statement they will be added back when reconciling operating profit to cash generated from operating activities, just like depreciation again. Assets are generally subject to an impairment review only if there are indicators of impairment. IAS 36, Impairment of Assets lists examples of circumstances that would trigger an impairment review. External sources ¤ market value declines ¤ negative changes in technology, markets, economy, or laws ¤ increases in market interest rates ¤ company share price is below book value Internal sources ¤ obsolescence or physical damage ¤ asset is part of a restructuring or held for disposal ¤ worse economic performance than expected goodwill and impairment The asset of goodwill does not exist in a vacuum; rather, it arises in the group accounts because it is not separable from the net assets of the subsidiary that have just been acquired. The impairment review of goodwill therefore takes place at the level of a cash-generating unit, that is to say a collection of assets that together create an independent stream of cash. The cash-generating unit will normally be assumed to be the subsidiary. In this way, when conducting the impairment review, the carrying value will be that of the net assets and the goodwill of the subsidiary compared with the recoverable amount of the subsidiary.

aSSeTS aRe geneRally SubjeCT To an impaiRmenT Review only if THeRe aRe indiCaToRS of impaiRmenT. iaS 36, impaiRmenT of aSSeTS liSTS exampleS of CiRCumSTanCeS THaT would TRiggeR an impaiRmenT Review.

When looking to assign the impairment loss to particular assets within the cash generating unit, unless there is an asset that is specifically impaired, it is goodwill that is written off first, with any further balance being assigned on a pro rata basis. The goodwill arising on the acquisition of a subsidiary is subject to an annual impairment review. This requirement ensures that the asset of goodwill is not being overstated in the group accounts. Goodwill is a peculiar asset in that it cannot be revalued so any impairment loss will automatically be charged against income. Goodwill is not deemed to be systematically consumed or worn out thus there is no requirement for a systematic amortisation. proportionate goodwill and the impairment review When goodwill has been calculated on a proportionate basis then for the purposes of conducting the impairment review it is necessary to gross up goodwill so that in the impairment review goodwill will include an unrecognised notional goodwill attributable to the NCI. Any impairment loss that arises is first allocated against the total of recognised and unrecognised goodwill in the normal proportions that the parent and NCI share profits and losses. Any amounts written off against the notional goodwill will not affect the consolidated financial statements and NCI. Any amounts written off against the recognised goodwill will be attributable to the parent only, without affecting the NCI. If the total amount of impairment loss exceeds the amount allocated against recognised and notional goodwill, the excess will be allocated against the other assets on a pro rata basis. This further loss will be shared between the parent and the NCI in the normal proportion that they share profits and losses.

STudenT aCCounTanT 08/2009

THe impaiRmenT Review of goodwill iS Really THe impaiRmenT Review of THe neT aSSeT’S SubSidiaRy and iTS goodwill aS TogeTHeR THey foRm a CaSH geneRaTing uniT foR wHiCH iT iS poSSible To aSCeRTain a ReCoveRable amounT.

Consider an impairment review of proportionate goodwill At the year-end, an impairment review is being conducted on a 60%-owned subsidiary. At the date of the impairment review the carrying value of the subsidiary’s net assets were $250 and the goodwill attributable to the parent $300 and the recoverable amount of the subsidiary $700. Required Determine the outcome of the impairment review. Solution In conducting the impairment review of proportionate goodwill, it is first necessary to gross it up. Proportionate goodwill Grossed up Goodwill including the notional unrecognised NCI $500

Only the parent’s share of the goodwill impairment loss will actually be recorded, ie 60% x $50 = $30. The impairment loss will be applied to write down the goodwill, so that the intangible asset of goodwill that will appear on the group statement of financial position will be $270 ($300 - $30). In the group statement of financial position, the accumulated profits will be reduced $30. There is no impact on the NCI. In the group income statement, the impairment loss of $30 will be charged as an extra operating expense. There is no impact on the NCI. gross goodwill and the impairment review Where goodwill has been calculated gross, then all the ingredients in the impairment review process are already consistently recorded in full. Any impairment loss (whether it relates to the gross goodwill or the other assets) will be allocated between the parent and the NCI in the normal proportion that they share profits and losses. Consider an impairment review of gross goodwill At the year-end, an impairment review is being conducted on an 80%-owned subsidiary. At the date of the impairment review the carrying value of the net assets were $400 and the gross goodwill $300 (of which $40 is attributable to the NCI) and the recoverable amount of the subsidiary $500. Required Determine the outcome of the impairment review. Solution The impairment review of goodwill is really the impairment review of the net asset’s subsidiary and its goodwill, as together they form a cash generating unit for which it is possible to ascertain a recoverable amount.

$300 x

100/60 =

Now, for the purposes of the impairment review, the goodwill of $500 together with the net assets of $250 form the carrying value of the cash-generating unit. Impairment review Carrying value Net assets Goodwill Recoverable amount Impairment loss $250 $500 $750 ($700) $50

The impairment loss does not exceed the total of the recognised and unrecognised goodwill so therefore it is only goodwill that has been impaired. The other assets are not impaired. As proportionate goodwill is only attributable to the parent, the impairment loss will not impact NCI.

TeCHniCal in THe equiTy of THe gRoup STaTemenT of finanCial poSiTion THe aCCumulaTed pRofiTS will be ReduCed by THe paRenT’S SHaRe of THe impaiRmenT loSS on THe gRoSS goodwill, ie $160 (80% x $200) and THe nCi ReduCed by THe nCi’S SHaRe, ie $40 (20% x $200).

Impairment review Carrying value Net assets Goodwill Recoverable amount Impairment loss $400 $300 $700 ($500) $200

The impairment loss will be applied to write down the goodwill, so that the intangible asset of goodwill that will appear on the group statement of financial position, will be $100 ($300 - $200). In the equity of the group statement of financial position, the accumulated profits will be reduced by the parent’s share of the impairment loss on the gross goodwill, ie $160 (80% x $200) and the NCI reduced by the NCI’s share, ie $40 (20% x $200). In the income statement, the impairment loss of $200 will be charged as an extra operating expense. As the impairment loss relates to the gross goodwill of the subsidiary, so it will reduce the NCI in the subsidiary’s profit for the year by $40 (20% x $200). observation In passing, you may wish to note an apparent anomaly with regards to the accounting treatment of gross goodwill and the impairment losses attributable to the NCI. The goodwill attributable to the NCI in this example is stated as $40. This means that goodwill is $40 greater than it would have been if it had been measured on a proportionate basis; likewise, the NCI is also $40 greater for having been measured at fair value at acquisition. The split of the gross goodwill between what is attributable to the parent and what is attributable to the NCI is determined by the relative values of the NCI at acquisition to the parent’s cost of investment. However, when it comes to the allocation of impairment losses attributable to the write off of goodwill then these losses are shared in the normal proportions that the parent and the NCI share profits and losses, ie in this case 80%/20%.

you may wiSH To noTe an appaRenT anomaly wiTH RegaRdS To THe aCCounTing TReaTmenT of gRoSS goodwill and THe impaiRmenT loSSeS aTTRibuTable To THe nCi. THe goodwill aTTRibuTable To THe nCi in THiS example iS STaTed aS $40. THiS meanS THaT goodwill iS $40 gReaTeR THan iT would Have been if iT Had been meaSuRed on a pRopoRTionaTe baSiS; likewiSe, THe nCi iS alSo $40 gReaTeR foR Having been meaSuRed aT faiR value aT aCquiSiTion.
This explains the strange phenomena that while the NCI are attributed with only $40 out of the $300 of the gross goodwill, when the gross goodwill was impaired by $200 (ie two thirds of its value), the NCI are charged $40 of that loss, representing all of the goodwill attributable to the NCI. Tom Clendon and Sally Baker are tutors at Kaplan Financial

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Relationship Between Accounting Assumption, Principles, and Theories

...make decision. (Simple studies, 2010). In this condition where full disclosure principle is coherent with going concern assumption can be relate with accounting rule FRS136, which is about impairment of assets. This standard is to ensure the values of assets are disclosed in the balance sheet, where the carrying amounts are not stated higher than their recoverable amounts. Impairment of assets occurs when the recoverable amount is lower that the carrying amount. Hence, the standard requires that an entity test for impairment. (ACCA, 2008). FRS 136 is related with going concern assumption because company assumed to operate their business without insolvency for indefinite period of time, which means company will also assume their assets will remain in company in order to operate the business. However, the value of assets will not remain the same for periods of time. That is why company are require to perform impairment test and recognize any impairment losses and make disclosure ( Earns & Young, 2011) on it as stated in FRS136. (Assumption) Company will have impairment of assets and states in its financial report in order to provide information to stakeholders especially shareholders, investors, and creditor, about the real value of assets is under the market value because of impairment of losses. This situation is regarded under full disclosure principle. (Principle) This principle of full disclosure that lies for FRS136 is related with decision usefulness theory......

Words: 934 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Ahmad

...Welcome to AIBF Financial Statement Analysis Training Asalamualikum! Khalid Zarif Current engagements Deputy Director & Academic Head of AIBF President of Afghanistan Association of Professional Accountants (AAPA) Bank Millie Afghan (BMA) Supervisory Board Member President of Afghan Social Researchers Association (ASRA) Work Experiences Business Unit Manger & adjunct Trainer, AUAF-PDI Technical Adviser, FinTRACA- Da Afghanistan Bank Custom Analyst- Ministry of Finance Official of Treasury Department- Ministry of Finance Education: Global MBA plus finalist of ACCA- Continuous BSc from Oxford Brookes University Certified Accounting Technician (CAT) 1. Purpose and format of the financial statements INTERPRETATI ON OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 2. Users of the financial Statements 3. Profitability Ratios & Interpretation 4. Liquidity Ratios & Interpretation 5. Gearing Ratios & Interpretation 6. Limitations of ratio analysis Accounting: Definition Is the process of     Recording Classifying Summarizing Interpreting in journal in ledger and in Financial Statements financial information in order to make decisions Financial Statements  Financial Statements present information about    The financial position of an entity Its financial performance during accounting period Its cash flow  Financial statements are 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Statement of Financial Position Statement of Comprehensive......

Words: 2260 - Pages: 10

Premium Essay

Ias12

...assets and liabilities recorded in its balance sheet at 31 December 20X8:   | Carrying value $m | Tax base (value for tax purposes) $m | Property | 20 | 14 | Plant and equipment | 10 | 8 | Inventory | 8 | 12 | Trade receivables | 6 | 8 | Trade payables | 12 | 12 | Cash | 4 | 4 | The entity had made a provision for inventory obsolescence of $4m that is not allowable for tax purposes until the inventory is sold and an impairment charge against trade receivables of $2m that will not be allowed in the current year for tax purposes but will be in the future. Income tax paid is at 30%. Required: Calculate the deferred tax provision at 31 December 20X8. Solution:   | Carrying value $m | Tax base (value for tax purposes) $m | Temporary difference $m | Property | 20 | 14 | 6 | Plant and equipment | 10 | 8 | 2 | Inventory | 8 | 12 | (4) | Trade receivables | 6 | 8 | (2) | Trade payables | 12 | 12 | - | Cash | 4 | 4 | - |   |   |   | 2 | The deferred tax provision will be $2m x 30%, i.e. $600,000. The provision against inventory and the impairment charge for trade receivables will cause the tax base to be higher than the carrying value by the respective amounts. Every asset or liability is assumed to have a tax base. Normally this will be the amount that is allowed for tax purposes. However, some items of income and expenditure may not be taxable or tax deductible and they will never enter into the computation of taxable profit. These have sometimes been called......

Words: 1842 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Annual Report Axiata

...TO PROFIT. * Normalised after adjusting for exceptional items, such as one-off gains on disposal/merger, accelerated depreciation, impairment/ FRS adjustment and foreign exchange gain/loss. pg 17 Raising the Bar president & GCeo’s BUsiness reVieW GroUp perForManCe reVieW I am pleased to report that Axiata recorded an outstanding performance for 2010, exceeding all its announced Headline Key Performance Indicators. The Group saw an all round solid performance in terms of revenue and profit growth across all major opCos. excellent and aggressive execution by all opCos on strategies saw positive quarterly revenue trends continuing, with the Group recording double digit revenue of 17% YoY to rM15.6 billion. The robust performance was on the back of continuous growth from key markets particularly Celcom, XL and robi with 8%, 27% and 31% growth respectively. The Group’s eBITdA grew an impressive 30% to rM7.1 billion, driven by the higher revenue and continued focus on cost management. exceptional performances were seen from dialog and XL where eBITdA increased by 82% and 50% via cost rescaling and strategic initiatives and tight focus on costs respectively. Almost all opCos saw margin growth which led to an impressive 4.5 percentage point increase for the Group, to 45.2% YoY. After adjusting for exceptional items, such as FrS impairment accounting adjustment, forex and one-off gains on disposal/merger, normalised PATAMI, representing the underlying operational......

Words: 95517 - Pages: 383

Free Essay

Night

...the year under review. The Group recorded a net profit attributable to owners of the parent of RM4.3 million as opposed to a net loss attributable to owners of the parent of RM9.5 million in the previous financial year ended 31 December 2012. Hence, the Groupʼs earnings per share increased to 7.5 sen from -17.2 sen in 2012, an increase of 24.7 sen. Chicken Cocktail (Blackpepper) Every bite releases a burst of flavours Overall, the Groupʼs improved results during the current year under review was due to increases in average selling prices of live broilers and table eggs during the financial year under review. Furthermore, during the financial year under review, there are decreases in allowances for impairment of goodwill of RM1.9 million and impairment in receivables totaling RM1.2 million. CORPORATE DEVELOPMENTS The Companyʼs Proposed Private Placement Exercise which was disclosed in the previous yearʼs Annual Report was completed on 25 July 2013. The utilization of the proceeds raised from the above Corporate Exercise is as follows: Purpose Proposed Utilisation RMʼ000 Actual Utilisation RMʼ000 Purchase of raw materials Private Placement Expenses 6,505 270 6,543 232 Total 6,775 Deviation Amount RMʼ000 6,775 (38) 38 The Group had fully utilised all the proceeds raised from the abovementioned exercise within the stipulated expected time frame of utilisation. ANNUAL REPORT 2013 Chairman’s......

Words: 49752 - Pages: 200

Premium Essay

Metro

...strategy by broadening our property portfolio to build sustainable streams of profitability which now includes residential and mixed-use developments, beyond our core commercial development interests. In continuing to strengthen and enhance our diversified portfolio, we remain focused on pursuing a prudent and balanced expansion approach to capitalise on our core competitive advantages for long-term growth. Key Facts NET PROFIT OF S$106.9 MILLION FOR FY2014 The Group achieved a 64.6% increase in net profit to S$106.9 million in FY2014 on the back of higher revenue from the property division, fair value adjustments and one-off items such as gains arising from the disposal of a warehouse in Singapore and negative goodwill on acquisition of an additional effective interest in EC Mall in Beijing. Revenue Net Asset Value S$194.3M S$1,182.6M +3.8% +3.3% Profit Before Tax Earnings Per Share S$124.8M 12.9 cents +52.1% 02 METRO HOLDINGS LIMITED Annual Report +65.4% PROPERTY REVENUE (S$’000) RETAIL REVENUE (S$’000) FY2014 66,059 FY2014 128,207 FY2013 58,328 FY2013 128,792 Property revenue increased 13.3% in FY2014 mainly due to the additional 18.4% share of EC Mall’s revenue from 3QFY2014 and investment properties in the PRC reporting improved revenue in spite of disruptions from Metro City, Shanghai’s asset enhancement exercise which was completed during FY2014. Average occupancy of......

Words: 51677 - Pages: 207

Premium Essay

Tesco's Annual Report

...and long-term debt less cash and cash equivalents, including derivative financial instruments, and other financial assets and liabilities, and excluding Tesco Bank. Definition Gearing is calculated as net borrowings divided by total equity. FixeD chARGe cOVeR Definition Fixed charge cover is the ratio of eBiTDAR (eBiTDAR defined as statutory operating profit before interest, tax, depreciation, amortisation and rent, adjusted for impairments (as listed in note 31) and excluding Tesco Bank eBiTDAR) divided by total debt service (interest on a historical basis) and operating lease expenses. Financial statements 2008 2009 2010 2011 5.5x 52.0% 74.0% £6.2bn £9.6bn £7.9bn £6.8bn 54.0% 40.8% 4.2x 3.7x 3.9x neT inDeBTeDness Definition net indebtedness is the ratio of adjusted net debt (including statutory net debt, pension deficit and the net present value of lease obligations) divided by eBiTDAR (eBiTDAR defined as statutory operating profit before interest, tax, depreciation, amortisation and rent, adjusted for impairments (as listed in note 31) and excluding Tesco Bank eBiTDAR). 2008 2009 2010 2011 08 09 10 11 08 09 10 11 2.83x 3.58x 3.19x 2.84x TescO plc Annual Report and Financial statements 2011 — 49 bUsINEss REVIEW Group financials Heading Group sales, including VAT, increased by 8.1% to £67.6 billion. At constant exchange rates, sales increased by 6.6% (including petrol) and 6.0% (excluding......

Words: 88441 - Pages: 354

Premium Essay

Front Page

...financial year Attributable to: Equity holders of the Company Non-controlling interest 2011 RM'000 2010 RM'000 2009 RM'000 2008 RM'000 2007 RM'000 2006 RM'000 2005 RM'000 4,086,103 3,860,071 3,505,248 2,856,886 3,195,826 1,863,177 217,604 305,033 322,753 177,226 307,210 123,074 (61,446) (89,612) (91,666) (22,922) (61,489) (22,934) 156,158 215,421 231,087 154,304 245,721 100,140 2,109,039 85,956 (24,871) 61,085 2,949,253 183,356 (49,788) 133,568 157,952 (1,794) 216,144 (723) 229,740 1,347 153,326 978 245,802 (81) 99,568 572 59,968 1,117 130,926 2,642 STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION Assets Property, plant and equipment Prepaid lease payment Investment properties Intangible assets - Goodwill Investment in associates Other investments, including derivatives Deferred tax assets Hire purchase receivables Finance lease receivables Total non-current assets Current assets Total Assets 858,396 16,535 20,303 13,944 27,128 1 24,339 251,153 2,378 1,214,177 2,723,795 3,937,972 675,779 11,357 17,558 14,448 19,791 1,807 14,520 386,788 1,440 1,143,488 1,893,421 3,036,909 618,388 10,490 14,191 18,920 1,807 12,090 284,554 3,945 964,385 1,781,634 2,746,019 584,941 10,582 18,281 1,806 4,881 312,811 7,116 940,418 1,524,964 2,465,382 592,837 10,692 18,212 5,806 4,501 165,331 3,633 581,806 10,803 17,824 5,806 5,385 116,686 5,405 449,532 10,913 17,100 5,806 9,042 157,281 5,684 655,358 1,275,258 1,930,616 326,236 15,853 5...

Words: 53190 - Pages: 213

Premium Essay

Swot

...Total Assets of RM537.5 billion, a 2% increase from RM528.7 billion in 2013. Revenue, recorded at RM329.1 billion, showed a 4% increase (RM11.8 billion) from last year’s RM317.3 billion. This was driven by an increase in crude oil production, higher processed gas and LNG sales volume, as well as a stronger US Dollar. Consequently, Earnings Before Interest, Tax, Depreciation and Amortisation (EBITDA) recorded a 2% increase (RM1.9 billion) to arrive at RM125.3 billion. The gloom of 2014 was reflected in Profit Before Tax which declined by 17.6% (RM16.6 billion) from RM94.3 billion in 2013 to RM77.7 billion in 2014. This can largely be attributed to lower revenue generated in the last quarter of the year and significant assets impairment losses recognised as a result of reduced crude oil price forecasts. 4% PETRONAS Group recorded a 4% increase (RM11.8 billion) in Revenue from RM317.3 billion in 2013 to M329.1 billion in 2014. Industry vagaries aside, PETRONAS had operated and performed remarkably well this year. The production enhancement initiatives implemented over the last few years continue to bring in good rewards. For 2014, total production increased by 5% against the same period in 2013, from 2,127 thousand barrels of oil equivalent per day to 2,226 thousand barrels of oil equivalent per day. Other than the enhancement initiatives, new oil and gas production from Malaysia, Iraq, Vietnam and Canada have also contributed to this......

Words: 82448 - Pages: 330

Premium Essay

Financial Accounting

... FFA PAPER F3 FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING BPP Learning Media is the sole ACCA Platinum Approved Learning Partner – content for FIA and ACCA qualifications. In this, the only FFA/F3 study text to be reviewed by the examiner:        We highlight the most important elements in the syllabus and the key skills you will need We signpost how each chapter links to the syllabus and the study guide We provide lots of exam focus points demonstrating what the examiner will want you to do We emphasise key points in regular fast forward summaries We test your knowledge of what you’ve studied in quick quizzes We examine your understanding in our exam question bank We reference all the important topics in our full index I N T E R A C T I V E T E X T BPP’s Practice & Revision Kit, i-Pass and Interactive Passcard products also support this paper. Note FIA FFA and ACCA Paper F3 are examined under the same syllabus and study guide. FOR EXAMS FROM FEBRUARY 2013 TO JANUARY 2014 FFA/F3 FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING First edition March 2011 Second edition September 2012 ISBN 9781 4453 9966 9 Previous ISBN 9781 4453 7305 8 eISBN 9781 4453 9242 4 British Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Published by BPP Learning Media Ltd BPP House, Aldine Place 142-144 Uxbridge Road London W12 8AA www.bpp.com/learningmedia Printed in the United Kingdom by Printers Polestar Wheatons Hennock Road Marsh Barton Exeter EX2 8RP......

Words: 166751 - Pages: 668

Free Essay

Information Technologies

...time, able to uphold its moral and social responsibilities. Highest revenue recorded Pos Malaysia ended its financial year 2010 with record-breaking revenue, the highest attained since 1992. Group revenue topped the billion ringgit mark to close at RM1.02 billion, 12.5% higher than in 19 came into effect from the second half of the year. Value-creation from transformation initiatives implemented during the financial year also contributed towards our operating profit. Consequently, Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amor tisation (EBITDA) improved by 24.0% to RM162.8 million. Never theless, profit after tax declined by 12.5% to RM67.1 million as a result of impairment losses amounting to RM47.4 million provided for investments in Transmile Group Berhad and the one-off impairment losses on capital expenditure in the postal counter system. The much anticipated National Mail & Parcel Hub (NMPH) commenced operations in October 2010. The NMPH, which saw 4 mail processing centres converged into a single facility in Shah Alam, paves the way for a new delivery model for Pos Malaysia. The new facility, replete with improved building design, new workflows suppor ted with advanced systems, new mail equipment and machine, is expected to improve mail service quality and increase automation levels in processing to 50%. In line with the new delivery model, a delivery beat recasting exercise was under taken during the year. This has translated into a reduction of......

Words: 50839 - Pages: 204

Free Essay

Hahaha

...OPBDIT/Revenue. Debt to equity ratio means Total debt/Total equity. Revenue and profit of UEM Group from continuing operations in 2011 have reduced significantly due to the absence of contribution from the local expressways.The results of local expressways (including PBSB) were classified as discontinued operations in 2011 in conjunction with the disposal of all local expressways’ assets and liabilities to PLUS Malaysia, pursuant to the PLUS Malaysia Acquisition. The financials disclosed in 2011 includes the one-off overseas provisions of RM404 million. Significant higher revenue and profit in 2011 was mainly due to a special dividend from PEB following the completion of the PLUS Malaysia Acquisition. Loss in 2010 was mainly due to impairment loss on major investment. The financial information in relation to financial years 2010 and 2009 has not been restated and are based on the audited financial statements of the respective years. 7 1.5 Description of the Programme The Programme is an Islamic medium term notes programme under which the Issuer may issue medium term notes under the Shariah principle of Musharakah, the nominal value of outstanding medium term notes which shall not exceed RM2.2 billion at any one time. The tenure of the Programme is up to thirty (30) years from the date of the first issue under the Programme. The tenure of the Sukuk may be between one (1) year to thirty (30) years provided that the Sukuk matures prior to the expiry of......

Words: 101090 - Pages: 405

Premium Essay

Shangri La Hotel Singapore

...in the income statement of the Company and its subsidiaries in 2012 were the gross fair value gains on investment properties of US$16.5 million, unrealized gain on financial assets held for trading and realized gain on disposal of fixed rate corporate bonds aggregating to US$18.3 million, interest income (including coupon interest from fixed rate corporate bonds investment) of US$15.9 million, negative goodwill of US$16.0 million arising from the acquisition of the investment holding companies which own the Shangri-La Hotel, Sydney and the provision for impairment loss of hotel properties and properties under development of US$8.6 million. The consolidated finance cost for 2012 increased by US$35.5 million over 2011 on account of the convertible bonds issued in May 2011 and the fixed rate bonds issued in April 2012. The share of profits after tax for the year in respect of associates included a net credit after tax of US$183.3 million (2011: US$105.9 million) for fair value gains of investment properties and a credit of US$6.6 million (2011: US$5.4 million) for negative goodwill arising from acquisition of an associate. Aided by the large increase in the share of profits after tax of associates of US$96.0 million, the Group recorded a 41.9% increase in consolidated profits attributable to the equity holders of the Company. 2. CORPORATE DEBT AND FINANCIAL CONDITIONS On 10 April 2012, the Group issued 5-year fixed rate bonds due April 2017 in the aggregate principal......

Words: 64444 - Pages: 258

Free Essay

Anjeng

...konvergensi IFRSs ini, entitas-entitas bisnis yang memiliki akuntabilitas publik harus menerapkan SAK yang sebagian besar sudah konvergen dengan IFRSs. Salah satu dari entitas bisnis yang berakuntabilitas publik adalah BUMN dan tentu saja termasuk anak perusahaannya, karena laporan keuangan anak perusahaan harus dikonsolidasikan dengan entitas induknya. Khusus untuk BUMN, penggunaan SAK yang berterima umum di Indonesia diwajibkan dalam instruksi Menteri Negara BUMN RI nomor SE-05/MBU/2009. Salah satu dari pengaturan dalam SAK yang harus diterapkan oleh perusahaan migas adalah pengaturan dalam PSAK 48 (revisi 2009): Penurunan Nilai Aset. PSAK 48 (revisi 2009) ini menggantikan PSAK 48 (1998): Penurunan Nilai Aset, dan bersumber dari IAS 36: Impairment of Assets yang berlaku efektif 1 Januari 2009. PSAK 48 (revisi 2009) berlaku efektif per 1 Januari 2011 dengan ketentuan transisi prospektif. PSAK 48 (revisi 2009) mensyaratkan agar aset-aset yang terkena pengaturan dalam PSAK tersebut diuji penurunan nilai ketika terdapat indikasi penurunan nilai. Uji penurunan nilai ini diterapkan pada aset individual, kelompok aset, atau UPK (Unit Penghasil Kas – Cash Generating Unit/CGU). UPK merupakan kelompok aset terkecil teridentifikasi yang menghasilkan aliran kas masuk yang sebagian besar independen dari aliran kas masuk dari aset atau kelompok aset lain. Tujuan dari uji penurunan nilai dan penurunan nilai adalah agar aset-aset yang disajikan dalam laporan posisi keuangan......

Words: 12245 - Pages: 49

Free Essay

Ibfm

...objective These differences were contributory factors to differences between the analyst private information set and the company management information set Managers perceived intangibles to be a broad concept that included not only the accounting number of goodwill and other intangible assets on the balance sheet but also other non-financial items, while quantitative oriented analysts appeared to focus mainly on the former when they talked about the term intangibles. The analysts and banks differed in the way the understood the interactions in business model. The banks tended to provide forward-looking explanations of the role of intangibles in the company value creation process. Analysts looked at intangibles through a reverse attribution or inference of how financial performance (FP) was caused by the role of intangibles in the company value creation process. They then used the inferences in their forward looking view. Almost all the managers interviewed presented the view that intangibles rather than tangibles were key sources of competitive advantage for their institutions. The analyst accepted this but placed more emphasis on financial tangibles (equity, cash) and intangibles (such as goodwill). Almost all the managers interviewed discussed the importance of intangibles for their business success. Company (bank) management stressed intangibles and a more balanced and integrated view of a combined set of tangibles and intangibles. Some core......

Words: 28563 - Pages: 115