Free Essay

Accounting and Finance Degrees: Is the Academic Performance of Placement Students Better?

In: Business and Management

Submitted By abigailabigail
Words 7789
Pages 32
Accounting and finance degrees: is the academic performance of placement students better?

Abstract

The relationship between placement and academic performance on accounting and finance degrees is significantly under-researched. This paper examines the relationship between a number of factors, including placement, and academic performance as measured by average marks. Readily available data on placement status, gender and prior achievement for the academic years ended 2004, 2005 and 2006 for an accounting and finance degree were used. Linear regression models were constructed using two versions of the data – one with all students in it and the second with graduates only. Placement students perform significantly better than full-time students and, in the Graduates model, it is the female placement students who perform significantly better than their male counterparts. Most recent prior academic performance is significant in all models whereas gender had no separate significant effect on performance in the second and final years of the degree. The paper concludes with suggestions for further research into placement.

Keywords: academic performance, placement, gender, work-based learning

Introduction

There is a considerable body of UK and overseas research investigating the influence of particular factors on academic performance. Factors such as gender, prior academic achievement and course type have been examined over a wide range of degree courses (see for example Morrison et al., 2005; Gomez et al., 2004; Koh & Koh, 1999; Hoskins et al., 1997). Although some of this research focuses on accounting and finance courses there is very little recent UK research and a paucity of research into the relationship between placement and academic performance. This study aims to re-examine some of the factors influencing academic performance in an accounting and finance degree with particular emphasis on placement (also known as internship) using readily available information from university records.

The paper begins by setting the context for this study. The next section evaluates the existing research on factors influencing academic performance and identifies a lack of recent UK research into the relationship of placement to academic performance (however measured) on accounting and finance degree courses. Factors influencing performance – particularly placement status, prior academic achievement and gender – are investigated using regression models. Conclusions are then drawn and areas for further research identified.

Context

Increasing attention is being paid to the employability of graduates and additionally the part that higher education (HE) plays in preparing them for work (Ryan et al., 1996; Dearing, 1997; Mason et al., 2003; Cranmer, 2006). Knight and Yorke (2004, p.25) identify the following aspects involved in the notion of “employability”:

• Getting a graduate job • Possession of a vocational degree • Possession of ‘key skills’ or suchlike • Formal work experience • Good use of non-formal work experience and/or voluntary work • Skilful career planning and interview technique • A mix of cognitive and non-cognitive achievements and representations

Placement offers the opportunity for the fourth of these - formal work experience - which is often highly valued by employers (Harvey et al., 1997; Little and Harvey, 2006). In the UK this is offered by some HE institutions in the form of a one-year placement with a single employer as part of a planned programme of study (alternative forms of placement include two six month stints at different employers or much shorter periods such as six weeks or three months). The placement normally occurs between the second and final years of study, is supervised and the student is required to produce an assessed report relating to the placement experience. Whilst such placements may potentially increase a students’ employability because employers value the work experience itself, it is also of interest to see whether placement improves students academic performance in the year following placement.

There is, however, little hard evidence that work placement enhances academic development. As Little and Harvey (2006, p.2) point out:

Very little research explicitly explores how the placement experience translates into academic development from the point of view of current students. Much is taken for granted, the observed maturity of undergraduates returning from a period of work placement is assumed to carry over into a more studious or reflective approach to learning but there is little direct evidence to be found of this in the literature.

Any positive academic relationship in terms of better performance leading to a better degree classification may also affect another aspect of employability – getting a graduate job (Knight and Yorke, 2004, above). There is anecdotal evidence to suggest that employers prefer first or upper second (2.1) class degrees to lower seconds (2.2) and below. A better class of degree, coupled with any better employment prospects arising from having work experience, may encourage others to follow the placement route (or stimulate competition with students not taking a placement) benefiting both students and academics.

The relationship between placement and academic performance is thus worthy of further study.

The factors which may influence academic performance

This section contains a review of prior research within the UK and elsewhere, in accounting and non-accounting contexts.

Placement

There is almost no research into the relationship of placement (i.e. where students undertake a work based placement, often as the third year, as part of their degree) to academic performance in an accounting and finance context. Gracia and Jenkins (2003) considered the relationship of placement to final year performance but as placement did not appear in their final stepwise regression model, the relationship was unquantified. In Gammie et al. (2003) all students did a placement, so it was not possible to separately quantify any placement relationship. Koh & Koh (1999) included the time spent on national service for males as a measure of prior work experience in their study, arguing that skills learnt such as communication and leadership are similar to those learnt in the workplace. They found students with work experience performed significantly better at all three levels of the degree programme than those without the experience.

Duignan (2002) found no significant difference between the performance (using mean module percentage scores) of placement and full-time business undergraduates. He suggested (p.216) that this did not mean that students had failed to learn on placement but it was ‘suggestive of a failure to exploit to the full the learning potential of the placement with respect to those attributes that are commonly valued and evaluated by academics’. Duignan (2003, p.345) also argues that ‘the skills and competencies that are engendered by successful placements are not easily transferable into academic performance’.

More research has been published on placement in non-accounting contexts. Gomez et al. (2004) analysed graduate students on a bioscience degree over a two year period. The effect of type of course followed and gender, amongst other factors, on aggregate percentage marks in each of the three years on the course were examined. They found no significant difference in performance between males and females in the first two years but that females performed significantly better than males in the final year. In contrast to Duignan (2002), those taking the optional placement course performed significantly better than those following the normal, full-time degree in the final year. In addition, there was no significant difference between the performance of male and female placement students in the final year following the year of placement. One possible factor contributing to this, suggested by the authors, is that the more academically able students follow a placement course. They found that placement students had significantly better HESA scores (a points measure based on ‘A’ level grades obtained at school in the UK) than those on full-time degrees and that HESA score, as a measure of prior achievement, had a significant effect on final-year average marks for the bioscience students studied. However, their results showed that there was a significant positive effect of the placement year itself, regardless of initial academic ability measured by HESA score.

Rawlings et al. (2005) examined students graduating from information systems degrees over a four year period. They found that the probability of gaining a first or higher second degree classification was greater for students on placement rather than full-time courses (for students scoring at least 50% in their second level exams). They also found that there was a significant interaction between second-year marks and placement status on degree classification. Mandilaras (2004) also found that placement students in an economics degree had a significantly better chance of achieving a higher degree (first and upper second).

Students on a human psychology degree over a six year period were studied by Reddy and Moores (2006). Placement students significantly improved their final-year marks (compared to second-year marks) by 3.2% compared with 1.5% for those students not going on placement and they hypothesised that 14% of students improved their degree class by undertaking a placement. However, they noted that placement students had higher second-year grades and might have been expected to improve more in the final year.

Some of the literature reviewed above contains suggestions as to why the performance of placement students might (potentially) be better than full-time students. Mandilaras (2004), Gracia and Jenkins (2003), Duignan (2003) and Rawlings et al. (2005) suggest increased maturity may be a factor in improved performance. Increased ambition or motivation (Duignan, 2003; Gracia and Jenkins, 2003) leading to increased focus and determination to do well (Mandilaras, 2004) or the possibility of increased employability (Gomez et al., 2004) has also been identified. Skills and competencies have been mentioned by a number of researchers. Mandilaras (2004) suggests that, potentially, work experience may improve students’ reliability so they take coursework and exams more seriously. Koh and Koh (1999) speculate that work experience, in the form of national service, may improve leadership, communication and interpersonal skills and instil discipline. Duignan (2003) suggests that whilst on placement students might be expected to develop core competencies and that their academic performance might be enhanced by applying the skills learned on placement. Gomez et al. (2004, p.382) identify practical skills learned which can be used on the final-year biosciences project i.e. subject specific skills and ‘generic skills of team-working, communication, self-reliance and confidence, time keeping etc’. Rawlings et al. (2005, p.461) state that ‘complex working practices and environments require individual practitioner self-confidence in order to work flexibly and productively, learning new skills and adapting established talents’ and that placement can help gain these abilities. Reddy and Moores (2006) list eight benefits from placement – communication, time management, confidence, taking responsibility, self presentation, making presentations, writing skills and teamwork. All of this suggests the need for further research into placement.

Prior academic achievement, focus and gender

There have been many studies which have examined the factors influencing performance on undergraduate accounting and finance courses. Studies by Gracia and Jenkins (2003), Lane and Porch (2002), Duff (2004), Gammie et al. (2003), Turner et al. (1997), Wooten (1998), Jackling and Anderson (1998), Bartlett et al. (1993), and Koh and Koh (1999) all report the statistical significance of prior achievement on university performance. Generally it is the most recent prior performance which is of significance with Gammie et al. (2003, p.74) concluding ‘performance in the early years of the degree programme appears to supersede school performance’. Most often general measures of prior performance are used e.g. previous year average marks at university or points scores based on school qualifications but more specific measures such as performance in particular subjects/modules at university or school have been employed in some studies (Gammie et al., 2003 and Bartlett et al., 1993).

Some studies focus on performance in single accounting subjects or modules (Lane and Porch, 2002, Turner et al., 1997, Wooten, 1998, Jackling and Anderson, 1998, Lipe, 1989, Carpenter et al., 1993, Buckless et al., 1991, Keef and Roush, 1997, Mutchler et al., 1987) and others on overall performance by year ie first (introductory), second (intermediate) or final (Gracia and Jenkins, 2003, Duff, 2004, Gammie et al., 2003, Tho, 1994, Bartlett et al., 1993 and Koh and Koh, 1999) making comparisons difficult.

A number of studies have considered the effect of gender on accounting performance. Gracia and Jenkins (2003) found that females significantly outperformed males in the second year, but the effect disappeared in the final year. Koh & Koh (1999) reported that males outperformed females in the first two years of the course but that there was no significant difference in the third year. Gammie et al. (2003), Turner et al. (1997), Jackling and Anderson (1998), Carpenter et al. (1993) found no significant gender difference. Whilst there was no evidence that females significantly out performed males, Lipe (1989), did find a significant interaction between the gender of the student and that of the lecturer. Both Buckless et al. (1991) in the UK and Keef and Roush (1997) in New Zealand reported that many of the gender effects identified by Mutchler et al. (1987) and Lipe (1989) disappeared when controlling for prior academic achievement. In non-accounting contexts the findings are again mixed with Hoskins et al. (1997), Morrison et al. (2005), Woodfield et al. (2006) and Gomez et al. (2004) finding that females performed significantly better than males but Rudd (1984), Jochems et al. (1996) and De Vita (2002) finding no significant difference.

The key issues

From the literature reviewed above the following key issues are identified

• The relationship of placement to academic performance on accounting and finance degrees is significantly under-researched. • Prior academic achievement, measured in a variety of ways, is significant in many studies. Typically the most recent prior achievement is significant. (However, it may be that this prior academic achievement is simply a proxy for something else e.g. a particular learning approach or kind of motivation or level of intelligence and that the most recent prior achievement is simply the current manifestation of this something else). • There are interesting, but no consistent, findings on the effect of gender. • There is no common way of measuring performance and this makes comparisons between studies very difficult. For example, performance can be measured using average percentage marks, grades, degree classifications etc. • Studies vary in the level examined i.e. first, second or final years, with an examination of first-year performance being the most common (which may in part explain the lack of research into placement which occurs later in degree courses).

This research aims to address these key issues by examining the effect of placement, prior academic achievement and gender on final year performance using average percentage marks.

The research study

This research aimed to identify whether placement is significantly related to the academic performance of students enrolled on a UK accounting and finance degree course in one university over a three-year period. The opportunity to investigate the significance of prior areas of interest was also taken.

The following research questions were addressed

• Is the type of course chosen (full-time or placement) related to performance? • Does prior academic achievement influence current performance? • Is there a significant difference in the performance of males and females? • Are type of course chosen and gender interrelated in terms of performance?

In each case, performance is measured using average percentage marks (see below). For the purposes of this research the label “full-time” is used to denote students following a full-time 3 year degree course and the label “placement” is used to denote those following a full-time 4 year course including a one-year placement between the second and final years.

Methodology

The university maintains computerised student records containing a range of information including gender and type of course followed. This information was combined with Award Board reports which contain information on results by individual module and the average mark for each student by year for the BA (Hons) Accounting and Finance award for the academic years ending 2004, 2005 and 2006.

The final-year average percentage mark, L3%, (Gomez et al., 2004) and that for the first (L1%) and second (L2%) years (see Koh & Koh, 1999 for example) were used as the dependent variables in the regression models. Average percentage marks were chosen as the measure of performance as this avoids, for example, the bandings used for degree classifications (where the bandings can be quite wide e.g. 10%) and the method by which degree classification is determined which varies between institutions. It also allowed inferences to be made as to how any differences in average marks between placement and full-time students might impact on degree classification (Gomez et al., 2004: Reddy and Moores, 2006).

The independent variables chosen for study based on the key issues identified in the literature review and the readily available data were as follows.

• Gender (male = 0, female = 1) which features in much of the other research in this area. Anecdotally, staff teaching students in the final year of the degree course feel that placement students perform ‘better’ than full-time students and, in particular, that female placement students perform best of all. The inclusion of a gender variable (and the interaction variable below) will allow this to be assessed and directly compared with the findings of Gomez et al. (2004) in the same university. • HESA (‘A’ level points) score as a measure of prior school-level achievement. Intuitively, prior academic attainment might be expected to influence performance i.e. those with higher HESA scores might be expected to perform better than those with lower scores. Again, prior achievement (albeit measured in different ways e.g. cumulative grade point averages in many US studies) features in much other research. • Type of course (either a three year full-time course without a placement [FT] or a four year placement course with a year’s placement between the second and fourth years [P]). (FT = 0, P = 1). • Dummy year variables for 2005 (2005 = 1, not 2005 = 0) and 2006 (2006 = 1, not 2006 = 0) to investigate any individual year effects. • Two interactive terms (gender* FT or P and L2%* FT or P) to see if the nature of the relationship, if any, between final-year average marks (L3%) and the independent variables changes when the independent variables are combined. Prior research indicates that the most recent academic performance is normally significant hence the use of L2% (rather than L1%).

The university’s Data Controller approved the use of the above data as no students were to be individually identified.

As there is a numeric dependent variable which can be related to multiple predictor variables, the most appropriate model to initially consider is a multiple regression model to determine the broad patterns in the data. It is recognised that the above variables are not the only ones which could have been considered and that further research is necessary to explore placement more fully. Some suggestions for possible future research are made at the end of this paper. The data was analysed using linear regression in SPSS 13.0. Further analysis was undertaken where possible using t-tests of significance to compare means. In judging levels of significance, standard levels (1%, 5% and 10%) are used throughout.

Samples and analysis

The sample comprised students sitting their final-year exams in 2004, 2005 and 2006 (“All Students”). To facilitate comparison with Gammie et al. (2003) and Gomez et al. (2004), a sub-sample consisting only of students graduating in the three years was also examined (“Graduates”). Multiple regressions were carried out using four different models. Checks were made for multicollinearity (using variance inflation factors) and the residuals were examined for normality and no problems were found. Accordingly, there is nothing to cast doubt on the appropriateness of the modelling approach.

Direct entrants to the final year (for whom no HESA, L1% or L2% data existed) were excluded from the analyses as were other students for whom no HESA score was available (for example, those students joining after foundation years or from overseas) or second-year mark (for example, ERASMUS students on exchange years abroad). This means, for example, in Table 2 for All Students, n = 236 for L3% but excluding 49 direct entrants and 6 students without second-year marks gives n = 181 for L2%. There were 143 students, for example, for whom all the independent variable information was available for models 2, 3 and 4 for All Students (see Table 4). Hence, the models analyse only students who follow what might be called a ‘standard’ degree pattern other than in terms of placement status. Arguably, the older measures of prior achievement like HESA score and L1% could be excluded if the more recent measure (L2%) was the only significant measure of prior achievement (as in Gomez et al., 2004) to increase the sample size. However, this has not been done for consistency, as the HESA score is significant in model 4 for Graduates (see Table 4).

Results - sample characteristics

Table 1 shows that the majority of students were male and followed a full-time course. Only around one quarter followed a placement course. It should be noted that the Award Board reports from which this information is extracted are such that for the small number of students who switch from their intended placement course to a full-time course, all their information, including HESA score and level results, is recorded as if they had always been a full-time student.
[insert table 1 about here]

HESA scores and level average marks by year for All Students and Graduates are shown in Table 2. The increase in the fall off in numbers between All Students and Graduates over the three years is caused by students failing exams and in particular, for L3%, reflects the relatively higher failure rate of the overseas students who are direct entrants at the final level (which, whilst important, is not pursued further in this paper as only ‘standard’ students are included in the analysis).

[insert table 2 about here]

Results - gender and performance

A comparison of the performance of male and female students in each year was made (Table 3). There were no significant differences in any year other than the first (p < 0.10), where females performed better than males, in either the All Students or Graduates samples so any difference which existed at the start of the students’ university course had disappeared in subsequent years.

[insert table 3 about here]

Results - factors influencing performance

Four separate regression analyses were subsequently performed for each sample. The results are shown in table 4.

Model 1: L1% as a function of HESA score, type of course, gender and year
Model 2: L2% as a function of L1%, HESA score, type of course, gender and year
Model 3: L3% as a function of L2%, L1%, HESA score, type of course, gender and year
Model 4: L3% as a function of L2%, L1%, HESA score, type of course, gender, year and gender*FT or P and L2%*FT or P. where L1%, L2% and L3% are the % scores in the first, second and final years respectively.

Model 1

Table 4 shows that the HESA score is statistically significant in both model 1 regressions (p < 0.01). Thus prior achievement, as measured by the HESA score, has a significant predictive effect on first-year average marks. Type of course followed is not significant in either model 1 regression nor were there any year effects. For both model 1 regressions gender has a significant predictive effect (p < 0.05), female students gaining an additional 2.7% - 3%. Table 1 indicated the same gender effect in the first-year. The adjusted R2 shows the two regression models explain 12-15% of the variability of first-year marks and the model is significant in each case (p < 0.01).

Model 2

Table 4 also shows that the first-year mark is a significant predictor of the second-year mark for both model 2 regressions (p < 0.01). Compared with the first-year, HESA score is not a significant predictor of second-year marks. The type of course followed is now significant in both regressions (p < 0.05), with placement adding around 3% and 2.3% to the average second-year mark of All Students and Graduates respectively. The gender effect present in the first-year is not present in the second year. There is a significant year effect in both regressions (p < 0.01). In 2006 All Students and Graduates score an average 6% and 4% less respectively in their second-year exams. The adjusted R2 show the two regressions explain 50-55% of the variability of second-year marks. Again the model is significant in each case (p < 0.01).

Model 3

First-year marks are no longer a significant predictor for final-year marks (see Table 4) and neither is gender. The other consistent features are that the type of course followed is significant in both regressions (p < 0.01) with placement students gaining an additional 3.6%-5.5% on their average final-year marks compared with full-time students and second-year marks are a significant predictor of final-year marks (p < 0.01). The HESA score is only a significant predictor in the Graduates regression model (p < 0.10) where there is also a significant year effect (p < 0.05) with 2006 students gaining an additional 4.6% compared with Graduates in the other two years (see also average graduate marks in 2006 for level 3 in table 2). The adjusted R2 show the two regressions explain 48-55% of the variability of final-year marks. The model is significant in each case (p < 0.01).

[insert table 4 about here]
Model 4

Table 4 shows that there is a significant effect of both second-year marks and placement and also of the interaction between second-year marks and placement (p < 0.05). For full-time students the L2% coefficient is 0.959. The relationship changes for placement students to 25.851 + 0.959*L2% - 0.371*L2% = 25.851 + 0.588*L2%. Figure 1 summarises the model derived relationship between L2% and L3% according to placement status with all the other variables held constant at their average value. It can be seen that the benefit of placement is greatest those with lower average second-year marks.

For Graduates the significant interaction of gender and placement status (p < 0.05) shows a benefit of over 5% for female placement students. So for female placement students the effect of second-year marks is 24.246 + 5.368 + 0.756*L2% - 0.373L2% = 29.614 + 0.383*L2% compared with 0.756*L2% for a full-time student. For male placement students the equivalent results are 24.246 + 0.383*L2% and 0.756*L2%. These are illustrated in Figure 2 on the same basis as that for figure 1. Again, it can be seen that the benefit of placement is greatest at lower average second-year marks.

[insert figure 1 about here]

[insert figure 2 about here]

Discussion and further analyses

Intuitively, prior academic attainment (measured as ‘A’ level HESA scores) might be expected to influence performance i.e. those with higher HESA scores might be expected to perform better than those with lower scores. This study shows that prior achievement has a significant effect in the first-year of university study, no significant effect in the second year and a significant effect for the Graduates only sample in the final year. The latter is consistent with the findings of Gomez et al. (2004) who also studied a sample of graduate students but there is no obvious explanation for the reappearance of HESA marks in the final year for Graduates compared with All Students in this particular study. However, it should be noted that Gracia and Jenkins (2003) found that IQ appeared in the final year in their sample of all students, not having been significant before. In Woodfield et al. (2006), ‘A’ level points were only a significant predictor of final-year performance for females. Whilst Koh and Koh (1999) found ‘A’ level points were significant in all three years, the evidence in this study suggests at least some measure of prior attainment is an important factor (here it is the HESA score for L1, L1 for L2 and L2 for L3) and is more consistent with the findings of Gammie et al. (2003) and Lane and Porch (2002).

Other studies (Gomez et al., 2004 and Gracia and Jenkins, 2003) have found that second-year marks, but not those for the first-year, are a significant determinant of final-year performance as was the case in this study i.e. most recent prior achievement (rather than older prior achievement) is significant.

This study only found an independent significant effect of gender in the first-year, otherwise it was not shown to be a significant independent determinant of performance. When interacting with placement status the lack of significance in the All Students regression shows that placement had a similarly beneficial effect for males and females. However, the graduate regression indicated a significant interaction with female placement students benefiting by more than 5% compared with equivalent males (supporting the anecdotal view of lecturers). Earlier studies are also mixed as to their findings on gender as an independent effect. For example, Koh and Koh (1999) found males outperformed females in the first two years of a degree but not in the final year but Hoskins et al. (1997) and Morrison et al. (2005) found that females outperformed males in their degrees.

Students who go on placement achieve significantly better final-year marks. For example, graduate placement students gained 3.6% more than full-time students in model 3. Final-year marks have a 75% weighting when determining degree class, hence placement can have a major impact making the difference between a first and upper second, upper and lower second. Gomez et al. (2004) found that graduate bioscience students benefited from placement by around 4% on final-year marks, Reddy and Moores (2006) found the difference to be 1.7%. Rawlings et al. (2005) found a positive benefit of placements as in this study and also a significant interaction between the second-year mark and placement status on degree classification. This research supports that finding albeit in terms of an interaction between second-year mark and placement status on final-year mark (rather than degree class).

It could be argued that the better students go on placement and that the benefit does not result from the placement itself. The HESA scores and first and second-year marks of those going on placement and those following a full-time course were examined (Table 5). The t-tests indicate no significant differences in performance other than for All Students in the second year (p < 0.05). The results would generally seem to indicate no difference between the academic ability of those going on placement and those going on full-time courses. They would also seem to indicate that the time and effort spent on the placement search seems to have no adverse effect on second-year marks. Duignan (2002) and Gracia and Jenkins (2003) did not find any significant difference in academic ability prior to going on placement or not. Gomez et al. (2004) found that placement students had significantly better HESA scores and second-year marks than full-time students. This difference could simply arise because the sample years are different (they used 2001 and 2002 graduates) or because the context, science, is different. A subsequent analysis of the difference between average second and final-year marks indicated that placement students improve their marks by 2.68% (All Students) and 3.37% (Graduates) whereas full-time students’ marks decline by 2.57% (All Students) and 0.72% (Graduates). These differences in performance between full-time and placement students were statistically significant (p < 0.01) and the results are compatible with the earlier finding of a significant difference in the performance of placement students. The results are also consistent with those reported by Reddy and Moores (2006).

[insert table 5 about here]

As far as accounting and finance courses are concerned, Wooten (1998) hints at the effect of work experience in that non-traditional students aged 25 or more scored an extra 12% on average in his study but this is not developed further. Jackling and Anderson (1998) found that part-time students who typically had full-time accountancy related jobs performed significantly better.

Conclusions, limitations and further research

This paper goes some way to overcoming the paucity of research into the relationship of placement to academic performance on accounting and finance degrees. A statistically-significant better performance of placement students, as measured by average marks, compared with that of full-time students has been found. Better average marks may in turn result in a higher class of degree and, anecdotally where employers require good degrees (first or upper second), better employment prospects.

This study has been confined to a single degree course within a single institution so it cannot be assumed that the results can be generalised to other courses within the same institution or to other institutions. Amongst other things, there may be differences between course work and examination weightings, the nature of the assessment undertaken and the extent to which second-year results count towards the degree awarded. Additionally, multiple linear regression models are used which in itself assumes the relationship between the variables is linear, which of course, it may not be. The HESA score was used as a measure of pre-university achievement as the data were readily available. However, the HESA score may be a proxy for some other variable such as IQ, which could have been used instead. Importantly, no causal relationship has been shown i.e. that placement causes an improvement in academic performance.

Bartlett et al. (1993) concluded that performance cannot be entirely explained by background variables such as gender and prior performance. Other factors such as motivation, personality and attitude are likely to be as important. What this study shows is that placement provides a good focus for considering these other factors and requires further research. There may be personality/motivation/attitude factors that predispose a student to undertake a placement (e.g. improved employment prospects from having work experience and a better degree drive better performance) or not (e.g. those who switch to a full-time from a placement course) and these might be why placement students perform better rather than anything to do with the placement itself. On the other hand, placement might equip students with skills which are useful in the final-year and which improve their performance ie the placement itself does have a beneficial impact. Both of these possibilities were recognised in the literature review. If future research shows that better academic performance is a benefit of placement then with better planning and integration within the degree course, it could be that placement can made even more valuable for students. It would also be of interest to investigate whether other forms of work experience (e.g. part-time, voluntary) lead to a similar improvement in performance. Finally, the effect of placement on those students who were excluded from the analysis because no HESA score was available e.g. students following a foundation programme, could be examined.

Acknowledgements

The author is grateful for the helpful comments received from two anonymous reviewers and Professor Ursula Lucas, Dr Phaik Leng Tan, Dr Peter Taylor and Dr Paul White all of the University of the West of England.

References
Bartlett, S., Peel, M.J. and Pendlebury, M. (1993) From fresher to finalist: a three year analysis of student performance on an accounting degree programme, Accounting Education, 2(2), pp. 111-122.
Buckless, F. A., Lipe, M. G. & Ravenscroft, S. P. (1991) Do gender effects on accounting course performance persist after controlling for general academic aptitude?, Issues in Accounting Education, 6(2) , pp. 248-261.
Carpenter, V.L. and Friar, S. (1993) Evidence on the performance of accounting students: race, gender, and expectations, Issues in Accounting Education, 8(1), pp. 1-17.
Cranmer, S. (2006) Enhancing graduate employability: best intentions and mixed outcomes. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), pp. 169-184.
Dearing, R. (1997) The National Committee of Inquiry into Higher Education: Higher Education for the 21st Century, London : HMSO.

De Vita, G. (2002) Cultural equivalence in the assessment of home and international business management students: a UK exploratory study, Studies in Higher Education, 27(2), pp. 221-231.
Duff, A. (2004) Understanding academic performance and progression of first-year accounting and business economics undergraduates: the role of approaches to learning and prior academic achievement, Accounting Education, 13(4), pp. 409-430.
Duignan, J. (2002) Undergraduate work placement and academic performance: failing by doing, Conference Proceedings HERDSA Quality Conversations International Conference, 7-10 July 2002, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Western Australia. Available at: http://www.ecu.edu.au/conferences/herdsa/main/ papers/ref/pdf/Duignan.pdf

Duignan, J. (2003) Placement and adding value to the academic performance of undergraduates: reconfiguring the architecture – an empirical investigation, Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 55(3), pp. 335-350.

Gammie, E., Jones, P. L. & Robertson-Millar, C. (2003) Accountancy undergraduate performance: a statistical model, Accounting Education, 12(1), pp. 63-78.

Gomez, S., Lush, D. & Clements, M. (2004) Work placements enhance the academic performance of bioscience undergraduates, Journal of Vocational Education and Training, 56(3), pp. 373-386

Gracia, L. & Jenkins, E. (2003) A quantitative exploration of student performance on an undergraduate accounting programme of study, Accounting Education, 12(1), pp. 15-32.

Harvey, L., Moon, S. & Geall, V. with Bower, R. (1997) Graduates’ work: organisation change and students’ attributes. Birmingham: Centre for Research into Quality (CRQ) and Association of Graduate Recruiters (AGR). Available from: http://www.uce.ac.uk/crq/publications/gw/gwovf.html [Accessed 21 September 2006]

Hoskins, S.L., Newstead, S.E. & Dennis, I. (1997) Degree performance as a function of age, gender, prior qualifications and discipline studied, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 22(3), pp. 317-328.
Jackling, B. and Anderson, A. (1998) Study mode, general ability and performance in accounting: a research note, Accounting Education, 7(1), pp. 65-73.
Jochems, W., Snippe, J., Smid, H.J. & Verweij (1996) The academic progress of foreign students: study achievement and study behaviour, Higher Education, 31(3), pp. 325-340.
Keef, S.P. and Roush, M.L. (1997) New Zealand evidence on the performance of accounting students: race, gender and self-concept. Issues in Accounting Education, 12(2), pp. 315-330.
Knight, P. & Yorke, M. (2004) Learning, curriculum and employability in Higher Education (London, RoutledgeFalmer).

Koh, M.Y. & Koh, H.C., (1999) the determinants of performance in an accountancy degree programme, Accounting Education, 8(1), pp. 13-29.
Lane, A. and Porch, M. (2002) The impact of background factors on the performance of nonspecialist undergraduate students on accounting modules – a longitudinal study: a research note, Accounting Education, 11(1), pp. 109-118.
Lipe, M.G. (1989) Further evidence on the performance of female versus male accounting students, Issues in Accounting Education, 4(1), pp. 144-152.

Little, B. & Harvey, L. (2006) Learning through work placements and beyond. Sheffield, Centre for Research and Evaluation, Sheffield Hallam University and Centre for Higher Education Research and Information, Open University

Mandilaras, A. (2004) Industrial placement and degree performance: evidence from a British higher institution, International Review of Education Economics, 3(1), pp. 39-51.
Mason, G., Williams, G., Cranmer, S. and Guile, D. (2003) How much does higher education enhance the employability of graduates? Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE). Available from: http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/rdreports/2003/rd13_03/ [Accessed 7 December, 2006].
Morrison, J., Merrick, B., Higgs, S. & Le Metais, J. (2005) Researching the performance of international students in the UK, Studies in Higher Education, 30(3), pp. 327-337.

Mutchler, J.F., Turner, J.H. & Williams, D.D. (1987) The performance of female versus male accounting students, Issues in Accounting Education, 2(1), pp. 103-111.
Rawlings, P., White, P. and Stephens, R., (2005) Practice-based learning in information systems: the advantages for students, Journal of Information Systems Education, 16(4), pp. 455-464.
Reddy, P. & Moores, E. (2006) Measuring the benefits of a psychology placement year, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(5), pp. 551-567

Rudd, E. (1984) A comparison between the results achieved by women and men studying for first degrees in British universities, Studies in Higher Education, 9(1), pp. 47-57.

Ryan, G., Toohey, S. & Hughes, C. (1996) The purpose, value and structure of the practicum in higher education: a literature review, Higher Education, 31(3), pp. 355-377.

Tho, L.M. (1994) Some evidence on the determinants of student performance in the University of Malaya introductory accounting course, Accounting Education, 3(4), pp. 331-340.

Turner, J. L., Holmes, S. A. & Wiggins, C. E. (1997) Factors associated with grades in intermediate accounting, Journal of Accounting Education, 15(2), pp. 269-288.

Woodfield, R., Jessop, D. & McMillan, L. (2006) Gender differences in undergraduate attendance rates, Studies in Higher Education, 31(1), pp. 1-22.
Wooten, T.C. (1998) Factors influencing student learning in introductory accounting classes: a comparison of traditional and nontraditional students, Issues in Accounting Education, 13(2), pp. 357-373.

| |All Students |Graduates |
| |FT |P |Total |FT |P |Total |
|Male |111 |38 |149 (63%) |81 |33 |114 (62%) |
|Female |63 |24 |87 (37%) |50 |20 |70 (38%) |
|Total |174 (74%) |62 (26%) |236 (100%) |131 (71%) |53 (29%) |184 (100%) |

Table 1 Number of students by course type and gender

| |All Students |Graduates |
| |n |mean |SD |n |mean |SD |
|HESA | | | | | | |
|2004 |37 |15.19 |4.971 |34 |15.26 |5.148 |
|2005 |57 |16.42 |4.648 |47 |16.68 |4.864 |
|2006 |55 |17.73 |3.734 |34 |17.50 |3.587 |
|Total |149 |16.60 |4.501 |115 |16.50 |4.659 |
|L1% | | | | | | |
|2004 |45 |55.876 |8.1995 |42 |56.524 |8.0457 |
|2005 |64 |57.684 |8.8626 |52 |59.467 |8.2432 |
|2006 |66 |58.788 |7.4946 |40 |60.828 |7.0783 |
|Total |175 |57.635 |8.2297 |134 |58.951 |7.9829 |
|L2% | | | | | | |
|2004 |45 |57.816 |9.1019 |42 |58.579 |8.8854 |
|2005 |64 |57.439 |8.8960 |52 |60.008 |7.4971 |
|2006 |72 |54.436 |7.3535 |41 |58.393 |6.2766 |
|Total |181 |56.338 |8.4678 |135 |59.073 |7.6069 |
|L3% | | | | | | |
|2004 |54 |55.904 |8.8343 |51 |56.616 |8.5244 |
|2005 |90 |55.450 |11.6190 |77 |58.235 |9.6689 |
|2006 |92 |55.120 |12.0958 |56 |62.454 |7.7094 |
|Total |236 |55.425 |11.2016 |184 |59.070 |9.0564 |

Table 2 HESA and level average marks for 2004, 2005 and 2006

| | |All Students |Graduates |
| | |n |mean |SD |p |n |mean |SD |p |
|HESA |Male |103 |16.59 |4.183 |0.984 |79 |16.32 |4.238 |0.524 |
| |Female |46 |16.61 |5.192 | |36 |16.92 |5.516 | |
|L1% |Male |116 |56.894 |8.2066 |0.095 |88 |58.065 |8.0628 |0.075 |
| |Female |59 |59.093 |8.1479 | |46 |60.646 |7.6284 | |
|L2% |Male |119 |55.624 |8.0018 |0.116 |86 |58.438 |7.0772 |0.201 |
| |Female |62 |57.708 |9.2098 | |49 |60.186 |8.4179 | |
|L3% |Male |149 |55.112 |11.3504 |0.575 |114 |59.169 |8.5239 |0.850 |
| |Female |87 |55.961 |10.9862 | |70 |58.909 |9.9245 | |

Table 3 Gender and level performance

| |All Students |Graduates only |
| |Model 1 |Model 2 |Model 3 |Model 4 |Model 1 |Model 2 |Model 3 |Model 4 |
|Variable |L1% |L2% |L3% |L3% |L1% |L2% |L3% |L3% |
|Constant |46.704 |17.494 |-2.142 |-10.078 |48.047 |20.262 |12.331 |3.396 |
| |(0.000) |(0.000) |(0.678) |(0.114) |(0.000) |(0.000) |(0.020) |(0.625) |
|L1% | |0.708 |0.105 |0.144 | |0.675 |0.013 |0.079 |
| | |(0.000) |(0.380) |(0.233) | |(0.000) |(0.912) |(0.497) |
|L2% | | |0.857 |0.959 | | |0.662 |0.756 |
| | | |(0.000) |(0.000) | | |(0.000) |(0.000) |
|HESA |0.602 |0.008 |0.084 |0.113 |0.579 |-0.017 |0.269 |0.296 |
|score |(0.000) |(0.943) |(0.578) |(0.453) |(0.000) |(0.883) |(0.054) |(0.030) |
|Placement |0.721 |3.076 |5.534 |25.851 |-0.469 |2.314 |3.641 |24.246 |
| |(0.575) |(0.002) |(0.000) |(0.007) |(0.738) |(0.027) |(0.005) |(0.015) |
|Gender |2.715 |-0.007 |0.051 |-1.056 |3.011 |-0.176 |-0.644 |-2.764 |
|(female) |(0.048) |(0.994) |(0.971) |(0.570) |(0.043) |(0.872) |(0.627) |(0.120) |
|2005 dummy |-0.193 |-1.781 |-0.229 |-0.297 |0.911 |-0.980 |1.717 |1.369 |
| |(0.907) |(0.152) |(0.894) |(0.861) |(0.589) |(0.437) |(0.262) |(0.359) |
|2006 dummy |0.278 |-5.896 |0.459 |0.007 |1.627 |-4.004 |4.616 |3.384 |
| |(0.869) |(0.000) |(0.807) |(0.997) |(0.385) |(0.005) |(0.010) |(0.029) |
|Gender* | | | |3.336 | | | |5.368 |
|FT or P | | | |(0.247) | | | |(0.042) |
|L2%* | | | |-0.371 | | | |-0.373 |
|FT or P | | | |(0.025) | | | |(0.027) |
|n |148 |143 |143 |143 |114 |110 |110 |110 |
|Adjusted R2 |0.120 |0.547 |0.551 |0.564 |0.150 |0.498 |0.484 |0.512 |
|(Raw R2) |(0.150) |(0.566) |(0.574) |(0.591) |(0.188) |(0.526) |(0.517) |(0.553) |
|F |4.996 |29.544 |25.934 |21.397 |4.992 |19.052 |15.583 |13.720 |
|p |0.000 |0.000 |0.000 |0.000 |0.000 |0.000 |0.000 |0.000 |

Table 4 Regression analyses. (p values for individual coefficients are given in parentheses).
[pic]
Figure 1 Placement – All Students Model 4 [L2% data range: 39.6% - 71.7% (FT) and 46.2% – 76.1% (P)]
[pic]
Figure 2 Placement – Graduates Model 4 [L2% data range: 41.8% – 71.7% (FT), 46.5% – 71.9% (P male) and 53% – 76.1% (P female)]

| | |All Students |Graduates |
| | |n |mean |SD |p |n |mean |SD |p |
|HESA |FT |89 |16.56 |4.535 |0.907 |64 |16.25 |4.925 |0.514 |
| |P |60 |16.65 |4.487 | |51 |16.82 |4.330 | |
|L1% |FT |114 |57.115 |8.4727 |0.254 |82 |58.562 |8.0505 |0.481 |
| |P |61 |58.608 |7.7291 | |52 |59.563 |7.9138 | |
|L2% |FT |123 |55.250 |8.5150 |0.011 |85 |58.421 |7.6694 |0.196 |
| |P |58 |58.645 |7.9546 | |50 |60.180 |7.4447 | |

Table 5 HESA, L1% and L2% comparison for full-time and placement students…...

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Working Students in Their Academic Performance

...coming back. * Providing a fresh selection of sweets. * Keep a daily inventory of our products. * Increasing our advertising efforts. * Offer special discounts during off times to keep costumers interested. * Keep an eye to our competitors in sweet business do. This way, we can implement changes to our business as necessary to maintain its competitiveness. * Use social media as a way of introducing our business. * Make every customers feel that they are the number one customer. Executives (include your resume) Carmel Sanchez Chief Executive Officer Marize Pitahin Finance Manager Mary Elizabeth Perez Marketing Manager Judy Ann Marquinez Production Manager Stockholders Arra De Castro Finance Asst. Julie Ann Gonzalbo Production Manager Designer...

Words: 279 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Impacts of Social Networking in the Academic Performance of Business Students

...environment on student academic performance at secondary school level? In: Bachelors Degrees, Senior Secondary Certificate SSC [Edit categories] Answer: INFLUENCE OF SCHOOL ENVIRONMENT ON THE ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE OF SECONDARY SCHOOL STUDENTS IN LAGOS STATE ABSTRACT This study examines the influence of school environment on the student academic performance in secondary schools in Lagos State. Factors such as school facilities, class size, school location and school plant planning were examined to know their effects on the academic achievement of secondary school students. Questionnaire was contracted to test the hypotheses developed. Simple percentage statistical tool was employed to analyse the variables. Based on the findings, it was discovered that poor school facilities, large class size, inappropriate school location, and poor school plant planning negatively affects students’ academic performance. Recommendations were made to address the issues of school learning facilities, classroom population, school location and proper school  plant planning. PROJECT PROPOSAL 1.1     Background to the Study            The school environment, which include the classrooms, libraries, technical workshops, laboratories, teachers’ quality, school management, teaching methods, peers, etc are variables that affect students’ academic achievement (Ajayi, 2001 and Oluchukwu, 2000).  Hence, the school environment remains an important area that should be studied and well managed to enhance......

Words: 1382 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Academic Performance of Working Students

...Profile of Working Students and It' S Implication on Academic Standing CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION Not all people are given the chance to have a quality education especially in the Philippines because it is now complicated. That’s why having the chance to study and choosing the course should not be compared to some thing like for an example buying a dress for a special occasion and when realization comes into your mind that you don’t want it, you’ll return it or maybe get your money back. No, this isn’t right, because in college life, you have to treat every second as an important detail of your life. You should not waste every moment in it. So choosing the course which you think fits your capabilities is very important. Studying a specific course in college is not only about paying the fees rather the most important things here are the time and effort spent. Money, time and effort are the most precious things in one’s life and once it is used or spent, it’s hard to gain again or worst you may never have it at all. So the time these are wasted for nothing, for sure the blame for this mistake will be felt truly. When looking at the profile of those students who are working and at the same time is studying, you would notice that they never dare wasting their time. For them, every second counts. Make an observation and you will find out that almost all of the working students are working too hard to finish their studies. For them, wasting their effort, time......

Words: 363 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Academic Performance of the Students in a Grammar Composition

...ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE OF THE STUDENTS IN A GRAMMAR COMPOSITION ____________________ A Research Proposal Presented to DR. GILBERT C. MAGULOD JR. Cagayan State University Lasam, Cagayan ___________________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Course Introduction to Research (Research 11) ____________________ JOEY ASTRERO JAY AR CABUTAJE MARY DYAN DELFUN March 2014 APPROVAL SHEET This research proposal entitled, “ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE OF THE STUDENT IN GRAMMAR COMPOSITION”, prepared and submitted by JOEY ASTRERO, JAY AR CABUTAJE, and MARY DYAN DELFUN in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the course Introduction to Research, is hereby recommended for Oral Examination. Approved with a grade of _____________ (__________%). Accepted as partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Course Introduction to Research (Res 11) ____________ GILBERT C. MAGULOD JR., Ph.D. Date Adviser ACKNOWLEDGEMENT The researchers wish to express their sincerest thanks and gratitude to the people who gave all their guidance, support and assistance in various endeavors. They feel appropriate to mention their facilitation to the following. Dr. Francisco O. Ocampo., our Campus Executive Officer for their guidance through the years; Mr. Gilbert C. Magulod, our adviser, for all insights and information and for their constructive critics and suggestion; To their loving, patient and......

Words: 2812 - Pages: 12

Free Essay

Academic Performance and Clinical Performance of Nursing Student

...a specified social context” (in nursing it is the clinical area). It also involves much more complex learning such as learning of concepts, problem solving, decision making, rule learning, critical thinking. The nursing educators and institutions have an ethical obligation to ensure admission criteria and academic standards that are reasonable and fare, yet effective indicators of students’ success. When an educational institution issues a diploma to one of its students, it is, in effect certifying the society that the student possesses all the knowledge and skills that are required in his chosen discipline. To remain competitive and accountable, it is imperative for nursing programmes to have efficient and reliable admission criteria. Quantitative data and research- base facts are essential for the development, revision and modification of the admission criteria to guide nursing educators to identify and select those students who will successfully complete the nursing programme. It also helps in minimizing the wastage of human and material resources that occur due to student failure and attrition (Dr. Romana Idrees, 2008). Furthermore, the students are exposed to a wide variety of clinical settings—including hospitals, outpatient, community clinics, treatment centers, and long-term care facilities—as well as patient populations diverse in age, gender, health status, socioeconomic background, and geographic distribution. According to Robles and......

Words: 4655 - Pages: 19

Free Essay

The Role of Student in Academic Performance

...(JETERAPS) 4(1):64-73 (ISSN:2141-6990) jeteraps.scholarlinkresearch.org The Role of Student-Related Factors in the Performance of Biology Subject in Secondary Schools in Eldoret Municipality, Kenya Wabuke Joy Mukhwana Chepkoilel University College, Department of Science Education, P. O. Box 1125-30100, Eldoret, Kenya. ___________________________________________________________________________ Abstract This paper focuses on the student-related factors that influence performance of students in Biology in Kenya Certificate of Secondary Education in Eldoret municipality. The study was conducted through an ex-post facto design. A total of ten secondary schools were sampled. Target respondents were Form Three students and teachers of Biology (those teaching Form Three) within the municipality. The study sample (which was made up of 225 respondents; 200 students and 25 teachers) was obtained using stratified sampling. Simple random sampling was then used to choose the streams and particular students who participated in the study. Purposive sampling was used to obtain only the students who study Biology. The data was collected using questionnaires, observations and interviews and analysed using statistical package for social science (SPSS) computer programme. The results were presented using descriptive and inferential statistics. It was established that student-related factors affecting performance of Biology in Eldoret Municipality are: primary school Science which provides a......

Words: 7725 - Pages: 31

Free Essay

The Working Students and Their Academic Performance

...Conceptual Framework Study habits and academic performance of the working students have attracted increased attention among the university teachers and students with the aim of knowing and understanding the reasons, problems and other factors affecting them. This may empower them for lifelong learning to their journey to success hindered by their busy schedules and always no time to their study and academic performance. In Surigao State College of Technology the study habits and academic performance of working students give any positive and or negative impact on their grades depending on how they cope with it. INPUT PROCESS OUTPUT Figure 1.The Research Paradigm The research paradigm illustrates the conceptual framework of the study that shows the relationship of the input, process and output of the topic. This framework embodies the specific direction by which the research will have to be undertaken by describing the relationship between specific variables identified in the study. The input consists of the research method applied in conducting the research regarding the study habits and academic performance of the working students. Qualitative research undertaken to gain insights concerning attitudes, beliefs, motivations and behaviours of individuals to explore a social or human problem and include methods such as focus groups, in-depth interviews, observation research and case studies. The process on the other hand shows how the research being conducted through......

Words: 982 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

The Academic Performance of Working Students

...Introduction Many high school students today work part-time. Their reason for working is mostly due to the fact that they lack the financial that they need. Few would reason that their working for only personal leisure. Employment while studying has a greatly effect in their academic performance. Academic performance refers on how student deals with their studies, it is on how they accumulate knowledge while listening or communicate in their skills. Many researchers debate about the effect of part-time job in their academic performance. Some of the researchers found out that having a part-time job could decrease the academic performance of a student, time for bonding with family and especially time for you to relax. Straus and Holmberg (1968) found that the association between grades and students’ employment status is weak. (Coleman, 1974), demonstrated that workers have slightly lower grade point averages than non-workers. But some of the researchers found out that having a part time job could increase the academic performance of a student especially the working skills, responsibility, punctuality, and build self-confidence. In contrast, critics have argued that employment, as it occurs now (in fast-food restaurants, grocery stores, retail stores, and so forth), does not educate or properly prepare students for adult occupational roles (Behn, et al., 1974; Greenberger and Steinberg, 1981; Steinberg, 1982), fails to foster the psychological maturity or development......

Words: 319 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Student Acomodation and Academic Performance

...PROPOSAL TOPIC: STUDENT ACCOMODATION AND ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE IN BABCOCK UNIVERSITY (2011 – 2014) INTRODUCTION This study aims to investigate the relationship between student accommodation and their academic performance with the goal of determining the factors relating to their accommodation that affect their performance academically. OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY 1. To obtain the general perceptions of students on the effect the accommodation have on their academic performance. 2. To identify the factors that affects their study environments in relations to their academic performance. 3. To proffer some possible solutions to the problems affecting the academic performance of the students due to their study environments. RESEARCH QUESTIONS i. What are the general perceptions of students on the effect of the accommodation have on their academic performance? ii. What are the factors that affect their study environments in relations to their academic performance? iii. What are the possible solutions to the problems affecting the academic performance of the students due to their study environments. SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY The findings of this study will help everyone; especially the students in assessing the environments where they live and study, and in addition it has provided information on student assessment of the availability of facilities in helping students in their studies and the quality of live on campus. It was also hoped that the information......

Words: 397 - Pages: 2

Free Essay

Effects of Bullying in Academic Performance of a Student

...choose the sophomores students (grade 8) because they have concluded that grade 8 students have enough maturity and they are in the stage where changes in their mind and body occur. The questionnaires include essays, to find out, how the respondents think, how can they help in creating peaceful and harmonious schools. The Researchers also observed the effects of bullies in the performance of particular students. Descriptive Research fits the research topic which is bullying because it is described , interpreted and analyzed. Abstract The study was conducted to know the effects of bullying in the student’s academic performance and personal growth and development. The study was limited only to Grade 8 High School Student of College of the Immaculate Conception because the researchers believe that these sophomore student ( grade 8 students ) are in the development stage of their life where their mind and body changes. This means that they are the perfect respondents because the researchers want to assessed the effects of bullying in the academic performance and in the Personal growth and development of the students. The effects of bullying assessed are the common effects of bullying that greatly affects the student in their academics and their growth and development. Thus through using a particular research method, the researchers were able to find out that those students who are being bullied have negative effects in their performance in school and their......

Words: 1264 - Pages: 6

Premium Essay

Factors Affecting the Academic Performance of Students

...problem and its background Introduction Students are most essential asset for any educational institute. The students must be nurtured and guided because the social and economic development of the country is directly linked with student academic performance. The elementary students’ academic performance measurement has garnered considerable attention to research bodies but in a broader perspective considering all the possible factors that may affect student learning. This research will focus only on the social factors affecting the academic performance of lower section students to give keener and precise observation because these factors strongly influence on the student performance. Learning is influenced by social interactions, interpersonal relationships, and communication with others.Learning is often enhanced when children have an opportunity to interact with andcollaborate with others on instructional tasks. In these situations, children haveopportunities for perspective taking and reflective thinking that can enhance their self-esteemand development. Quality interpersonal relationships can provide trust andcaring that increase children’s sense of belonging, self-respect, self-acceptance, andproduce a positive learning climate. Parents, teachers, and peers are very importantpeople in the child’s social world (Lumsden 1994). The relationships and interactions experienced by the students can enhance or undermine the students learning. Attitude can alter every......

Words: 1101 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Academic Performance of Student

...__________________ ____________________ (signature) Date Mr Mike Ewa Henshaw Co-ordinator Dedication The project work is dedicated to God Almighty for His infinite mercy towards my academics. Also, to my beloved mother and brother, Mrs. Florence and Rev. Fr. Daniel Okwor respectively, for their love, care, understanding and support, may good lord continue to bless both. Acknowledgement I wish to acknowledge all the help given to me towards the successful completion of this project. My special gratitude goes to my project supervisor Dr. Onwo, D.O who has been impacting knowledge and inspired me into writing this project. With utmost respect I extend my special regards to Mr. Agu F.C., Mr. Duhu J.O., Mr. Ugwu I.C., Mr. Agbo H.N, Mr. Nwankwo J. and Dr. Omenma D.A, my H.O.D. for their extremely useful efforts in the political science department. I am also, thankful to my brothers and sisters especially Rev. Fr Dan. Okwor for their morals and financial supports. My special thanks goes to Mr/Mrs Cajatan Ani and my in-laws especially Patrick Offor who stood firmly with my family. I want to appreciate the support I received from my students both present and past and all my friends. They have been a source of inspiration to me. My sincere thanks go to my typist Mmuo Ogechukwu for taking pains to typeset this work. I ask for God’s abundant favour and blessing to you all. Abstract It is......

Words: 893 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Working Students Academic Performance

...bring my papa along with her so my papa realized that it’s better to leave us here instead of my mama being alone abroad.) * Provide their children with a good life * Influenced by the relatives who are residing abroad “Nasa Dubai akong mama ug papa bali nauna si mama tapos nag sunod si daddy. Para makatabang sakoa ug para masuportahan ko nila. Ug mas gusto man gud sila ug daghan nga income ug mas easy money man gud pag mag abroad. So financial sya ug akong tita ug tito man gud naa pud didto so naingganyo pud sila na mag abroad didto.” (My mom went to Dubai first and then my dad followed. They did that in ordert to support me. So it’s a financial reason and our other relatives are in abroad so my parents were influenced to go there too.) “Kasi mother side ko halos lahat na ng relatives niya mga cousins niya lahat mga kapatid niya, tito tita nasa labas na. tapos mas malaki din ang pera kay ano man siya ditto noon, teacher sa ateneo college, ano nursing. Sa papa ko parang ganun na din, mas malaki din ang kita doon. Mas may pera talaga doon. Halimbawa pwede man din mag pa copra ditto, copra ka tapos pautos ka tapos ganyan ganyan. Kasi andoon ang mommy ko tapos may extra income na din doon. my mother’s side of the family, her sisters and other relatives are already residing abroad.” (The income is also better there compared to her job as a nursing teacher here. The same goes with my papa, he earns a better income there and he could just ask somebody to handle his......

Words: 1436 - Pages: 6

Free Essay

Academic Performance of a Working Student

...Domestic Administration An introduction from the Home Bursar The menu choices in this section of the website provide information about the people who run the backup services and systems that life in College relies on. To a new student, and even one who has been here for a while, a college can seem to be impossibly complex. The hope is that this section will give you an overall impression of how these services and systems work and fit together. It will also tell you how you can make contact with the right people to deal with enquiries so that you get the most out of your time at St Catherine’s James Bennett The Home Bursar, Mr James Bennett, is responsible for the College grounds and buildings, health and safety matters, the general management of the College’s services and the staff who provide those services. Email: james.bennett@stcatz.ox.ac.uk The Home Bursar also acts as a point of contact for representatives of the student Common Rooms, the JCR and MCR, on what are called ‘domestic’ matters – the areas covered by this section of the website. The way St Catherine’s works means that good ideas and comments on how things are done can usually be very quickly acted on if they are raised directly with the appropriate member of staff. However, there are situations when a more formal approach might be required. In these cases, matters can be raised with one of the Home Bursar’s departmental Managers (Accommodation, Maintenance and Accounts), either directly or through......

Words: 432 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Academic Performance of Working Students

...obstacles Vanish.   Motivation is what gets you Started; Habit is what keeps you going". - John Quincy Adams What is Academic Performance?  Academic Performance refers on how student deal with their studies, it is on how they do the entire task that they assign to. Base on how they will cope up or communicate in their studies.  So what it means to become a working student?  A working student is an individual who works while studying. It’s a matter of time management. In order to support their needs, they need to work for themselves. Being a working student is kind of tough for us ordinary students.  Value of Study? So when we say the value of study, it is the importance of studying for us student. Why studying is acquire?   Because without it we can’t communicate with others, we can’t land a better job. Studying is simply a key for success. That’s why we are entering school because all of us believe that through knowledge we can achieve everything in life. Overview at Working Student The Researchers topic The Academic Performance of Working Students in Colegio De Dagupan tells about the conduct of those students who are working at the same studying. We choose this matter for us to better understand on how they manage their time and what its effects to their studies. The Researchers have chosen the topic to satisfy their curiosity. As for us student whose only supported by their parents can't encounter these way of life. So we settle this issue to be familiarize......

Words: 658 - Pages: 3