Free Essay

Active Portfolio Management: Country vs. Sector Characteristics

In: Business and Management

Submitted By lyyww
Words 4671
Pages 19
Active Portfolio Management: Country vs. Sector Characteristics

Executive Summary
This project sets out to invest between 7bn and 9bn Euros for a large pension fund in European equities, chosen from the MSCI Europe Index, which also serves as the benchmark to measure performance against. Two portfolios need to be created, one to reflect asset allocation focussed on countries and the other on sectors, with the number of assets in each portfolio being no more than 150. Both portfolios must be actively managed, having at least an active risk of 3% when compared to the benchmark. To achieve this, I followed a three step top-down approach for our investment decision process. Firstly, I started with an analysis of the macroeconomic environment in Europe, followed by forming opinions on the relative strengths and weaknesses of the constituent countries and sectors, using the macro-analysis to determine which are most likely to perform well, given the long-run trends identified. Finally, I invested in all mid-cap companies within the selected countries and sectors, based on our judgement that middle sized firms are poised to prosper the most in this difficult economic environment, which I predict to remain tough for the foreseeable future. After finalising the initial portfolios in this way, I used BarraOne to optimise them. Following optimisation, I compared the risk profile of each portfolio to the benchmark. Our findings show that an actively managed portfolio, especially one constrained to 150 assets, will necessarily be less diversified than the benchmark. For the country portfolio, the lack of diversification materialised in a high level of currency risk, which I purposely limited using a constraint during the optimisation process. This was to be expected when considering that the exclusion of some countries from the portfolio would also change the mixture of currency exposure when compared to the benchmark, increasing currency risk. The sector portfolio suffered more from selection risk, because limiting investment to just a few sectors reduces the benefits of diversification across many sectors, which are each affected differently by the various stages of the economic cycles. In terms of active risk management, by looking at active exposure and the marginal contribution to risk of different factors, I identified a clear link between the two. It is then apparent that any adjustment that makes the portfolio more similar to the benchmark, by reducing a specific active exposure, is also likely to reduce active risk, although this will not strictly be the case for all factors. In conclusion, an actively managed portfolio is bound to be less diversified than a broad index. This should be hardly surprising, as active management means taking extra risks, which stem from bets that distinguish the active portfolio from its benchmark, usually resulting in an asset allocation that is less diversified. As is often said, there is no free lunch in finance.

Introduction
For this project I assume the investor, a pension fund, to be mainly concerned with investment risk thus no return objective will be specified. Two portfolios, one based on country and one based on sector allocations, are to be constructed using an active management approach, meaning that active risk must exceed 3% when compared to the MSCI Europe Index, acting as the benchmark. Following the strategic asset allocation already decided on by the investor, all assets must be chosen from the benchmark (i.e. European equities only) and the total number of assets may not exceed 150. The investor’s risk tolerance is assumed to be 0.075. Since the investor is a pension fund, the investment horizon is deemed to be long term. Total funds available for investment range from 7bn to 9bn Euros. Any tax, ethical and other legal requirements have been ignored, as will be any transaction costs.

Benchmark Analysis: MSCI Europe index
The Benchmark Market Index used in this analysis is the Morgan Stanley Europe Index (MSCI Europe Index) on the 5th of September, 2012. This Market Index consists of 447 stocks selected from European Countries. The total Market Value of this Benchmark Market Index is 79,346,187,415.69 euros.
The graph below portrays the Top 10 countries in terms of their weights in the benchmark. Most of the stocks of the benchmark are from the United Kingdom (35.44%), France (13.94%), Switzerland (13.30%) and Germany (13.17%), among which the United Kingdom contributes nearly one third. These countries fall in the top economies within Europe.

Table 1. Country weights in Benchmark MSCI Europe
The three sectors with highest weight in the Market Index are Financials (19.34%), Consumer Staples (14.85%) and Health Care (12.36%). The total risk of the Benchmark Index is 19.90% in terms of annualised standard deviation of return. The total risk is composed of 99.76% of Local Market risk, 2.69% of Currency risk and -2.45% of Currency/Market Interaction risk. The total risk of 19.90% is influenced by a low correlation of 9.23% between industry and style. The benchmark has a low selection risk of 0.32%, because the portfolio is made up of 447 assets making it well-diversified.

Portfolio Analysis: Country allocations
The economic outlook for Europe remains gloomy as worries about the lingering debt crisis and serious doubts about the continent’s future economic growth potential persist. The European market experienced its major setback in 2008 when most countries fell into debt crisis, which they have not yet fully recovered from, with Greece been the hardest hit. Attempts are being made by governments and central banks to enable the EU to emerge out of the debt crisis.
The country portfolio is made up of seven countries; Belgium, Switzerland, Germany, France, Italy, Norway and Sweden. Table 1 shows their respective weights against the benchmark used, which is MSCI Europe.

Table 2. Country weights in initial Country portfolio
Belgium’s GDP for 2011 was US$ 511.53 billion with an anticipated growth rate of 0.37% in 2012. Belgium’s economy is greatly influenced by foreign trade and remains well positioned to continue its growth. Its geographical position as well as its infrastructure gives it the promise to remain as the entry point for goods and services in Euro zone. Therefore, I give a weight of 10% to Belgium, whose active weight is 8.21%.
The GDP growth of Switzerland has been declining but continues to remain above zero, with a prediction of 0.85% this year and 1.35% in the next year. The inflation has been consistently below 0.7 (IMF, 2012), partly due to the fact that Switzerland has the world’s lowest interest rate. Swiss authorities have taken powerful measures to stimulate the economy. The weight of Switzerland in the initial portfolio is 7.5%, under-weight than that in benchmark.
Germany currently reported a surplus balance of trade of 16.9 EUR Billion in August 2012. This has been a trend over the years as export is its highest source of income. It is expected to continue to be a leading economy with growth in its services industry, especially its technology and finance sectors. Therefore, Germany has the highest weight (25%), with an active weight of 11.83%.
The GDP in France fell dramatically in 2009, after which it became stable. However, the GDP in 2012 Q2 fell by -0.1% (INSEE, 2012), which was mainly because of the total domestic demand shrink. Exports always fluctuate heavily than imports, except that predicted in 2013, indicating a future weakness of France’s future competitive power. In the country portfolio, France is under-weight the benchmark with a weight of 10%.
Because of its famed luxury goods, Italy has a very strong brand for the finer things in life. It is thus likely to benefit from the rise of emerging economies. Its north is also home to a number of healthy financial and industrial giants, making for suitable investment opportunities. Therefore, Italy was given a high weight of 17.5% in the initial portfolio with an active weight of 14.07%.
The GDP in Norway is recovering more quickly than other European countries, estimated to grow by 3.06% this year (IMF, 2012). The unemployment rate in August was lower compared with other countries. Low interest rate and high demand in the petroleum industry are the two main reasons why Norwegian economy performed better than other countries (Statistics Norway, 2012). Norway has a high portfolio weight (15%), with an active weight of 13.53%.
According to the IMF, Sweden’s public finances are one of the strongest in Europe. It had a fast recovery from the 2008 crisis due to its export markets and domestic policy (IMF, 2012). As OECD signals, its macro-economy has grown significantly faster than the OECD area as a whole (OECD, 2012). All the previous industrial and economy features lead us to believe that Sweden is a safe country to invest in. Hence, it is given the same weight as Norway (15%), with an active weight of 10.22%.
Portfolio Analysis: Sector allocations
As shown in the following graph, seven sectors have been selected in the Sector portfolio with differing weights from that in the benchmark.

Table 3. Sector weights in initial Sector portfolio

Information Technology was selected because is experiencing rapidly industry growth, with a strong demand from both private and business sectors. Although in a recession, there is an increased spending on servers, storage and networks. IT technology is a necessity in today’s business environment; so, I allocate 21% of the fund to IT sector, much more than 2.88% present in the Benchmark.
Because of a stabilising and ageing population, demand of the utilities sector is unlikely to change much. This predictable environment promises a less risky investment opportunity during a difficult economic climate. The sector’s high dividend yield makes it desirable too. Future growth in this area looks promising if the industry reacts quickly enough to become major players in these nascent markets. Therefore, I invest as much as 21% of the fund into utility sector, with an active weight of 16.85%.
The Telecommunications industry is another sector chosen to invest in. Although fixed-line services are declining worldwide, mobile services demand is continually increasing. It is expected that the number of mobile phone subscribers will rise to 6.4 billion by 2015 (QFinance, 2012). These stocks can be considered safe bets because of high capital investments and high cash flow generation capacity. In light of such characteristics, I decided to allocate 21% of the fund to this sector, as opposed to 5.98% in benchmark.
Manufacturing is a major contributor to the European GDP. Industries sector seems to be recovering although its output is still 17% of its peak level. In 2011, industrials sector in Europe produced an output worth $4377 billion leading the world’s Industrials sector. Thus, a proportion of 16% of funds is invested in this sector.
With respect to Energy sector, from the macro analysis of Europe, it is inferred that the business will not enter the recovery cycle soon; because energy demand will slow down during these years. The supply structure of energy is experiencing an evolution, which means that renewable energy is becoming more and more important; thus, only those companies that firstly grasp the technology will excel. Therefore, I will invest relatively low weight (7%) during this slowdown period, with an under-weight of 4.26% compared with the benchmark.
Nowadays, costs of healthcare are increasing due to an ageing population and the demand of better treatments, not completely met by public healthcare. On the other hand, according to World Bank, public expenditure on healthcare will rise to 14% of GDP in the European Union, in 2030 (The Economist, 2011). Healthcare companies are considered defensive stocks to invest in, because it is difficult for people to cut their spending on it (QFinance, 2012). However, because I are managing the portfolio on an active basis, I set the weight of 7%, with an under-weight of 5.36%.
Traditionally, consumer staples, is viewed as one of the least affected by the economic climate and thus a fitting choice for a highly risk averse investor. However, consumers in developing countries will start demanding basics such as household cleaners as they become richer. Since consumer staples can be easily shipped and many of the firms within this sector are large multinationals, their growth in revenues and profits will increasingly depend on the fortune of developing countries. Due to the similar reasons to that of healthcare, I set the weight of consumer staples as 7%, with an under-weight of 7.85%.

Company Analysis
Once the decision process has been made for countries and sectors to invest in, the individual companies’ selection has been made focusing on middle-cap companies. Middle-cap companies tend to be less risky than small-caps and provide higher growth potential than large-caps companies.
Middle-cap companies are those with market capitalization between 2 and 10 billion. Following this procedure, I left out big-cap companies to achieve an actively managed portfolio. Apart from this reason, big-cap companies are presumed to face difficulties in the future, due to heavier tax burden and social opinion towards multinationals. In the other hand, small-cap companies will be the weakest competitors, and probably those first to fail. Mid-cap companies are more likely to survive economic difficulties without facing political and social backlash than big-cap companies.
Weights for countries and sectors were selected taking into account the corresponding weights in the Benchmark. Following this comparison, it had been tried to maintain similar concentrations than those in the Benchmark; but also, changing the weights for the biggest ones.
For the optimization process of the Country portfolio, because that avoiding currency risk became difficult, a constraint of a maximum of 15% in Currency risk was set; and the “Sell none” constraint was also selected. The Sector portfolio was optimised using the BarraOne default profile.

Risk Profile: Country Portfolio vs. Benchmark
The largest active weight is in Subsea 7, a seabed-to-surface engineering company, representing a bet on the future prospects for exploration of deep sea oil reserves. The weights of the following nine stocks gradually decline from 2.42% to 1.58%, including Norwegian, Italian, Belgian, German and Swiss stocks.

Table 4. Top 10 Active weights in Country Portfolio
For the bottom ten holdings, active weights range from 0.06% to -0.09%, with Assa Abloy, a Swedish lock maker having the lowest weight. The remaining stocks are also either Swedish, with a few French and one Belgian.

Table 5. Bottom 10 Active weights in Country Portfolio

In terms of total risk, the portfolio risk is 4.07% higher than the benchmark, with an active risk of 7.01%. Around 85% of active risk can be attributed to Local Market Risk which consists of Common Factor Risk and Selection Risk. The latter figure means that around 12% of active risk is caused by the selection of assets, a result of the portfolio containing fewer assets and being less diversified than the benchmark. For the same reason, the portfolio risk from Factor Interaction is somewhat greater than for the benchmark, representing 14% of active risk. The percentage of active risk due to Style is more than a fifth, which is desirable in an actively managed portfolio. The remainder (37%) is caused by Industry. This is in line with expectations, since most of the portfolio risk of the benchmark also comes from this common factor. That 16% of active risk is due to Currency Risk can again be explained by reduced diversification as well as by the exclusion of UK companies. A slightly negative Currency/Market Interaction means that the effect from the large negative active weight on the UK is somewhat counteracted by the choice of the other countries.

Table 6. Risk decomposition graph for Country portfolio
The biggest contributor to active Local Market Risk is the UK, followed by Italy, Germany, Norway and Belgium. The ranking fairly accurately reflects the absolute value of active weights in the countries of the initial portfolio, bar Sweden whose weight was reduced significantly by the optimisation. For all countries the major source of common factor risk is industry, although style is a relatively important aspect for and France. Noteworthy is the -129.87% for Market Interaction, indicating that the choice of countries has a high diversifying effect, reducing local market risk and in particular counteracting the active risk from not investing in the UK. The benchmark has a Market Interaction of 81.25%.
Looking at the three largest factor exposures of a few selected countries, Italy’s largest active exposures come from Machinery (2.42%), Utilities (2.05%) and Autos & Components (1.85%). For Germany, active exposures are largest to Other Materials (2.55%), Machinery (1.75%) and Pharmaceuticals (1.57%), and Norway’s exposure is mostly to Energy Equipment and Services (6.55%), Metals and Mining (1.53%) and Other Capital Goods (1.52%). From these figures it is apparent that the portfolio focuses on industries with tangible products, goods that are to a large extent manufactured by mid-cap companies, in line with the investment objectives.
The most important styles are volatility, size, value and liquidity. All these factors are associated with the characteristics of mid-cap companies, which are more likely to have a volatile share price, affected by their size and value whilst being more thinly traded than large-cap stocks. Therefore the exposures and risks due to these styles are the predictable result of investing in mid-cap companies only.
In terms of Currency, unsurprisingly the portfolio is heavily underweight in British Pounds, overweight by ca. 9% in the Norwegian Krone and somewhat in the Swiss Franc (3%), with the Pound clearly causing the most active risk (2.91%).

Table 7. Currency risk decomposition for Country portfolio
The factors grouped by sectors contributing most to total risk are Energy, Materials and Consumer Discretionary, with Metals and Mining being represented heavily. This is also reflected in MCAR, with Materials, Industrials and Information Technology contributing the most, and again Metals and Mining having a large impact.

Active Risk management
By reducing the weight in the factors with the highest positive MCAR as identified above, especially Materials, active risk could be reduced. The proceeds could then be invested in British stocks, as this would reduce the currency risk to the Pound, with a MCAR of currently -0.03%. In terms of style, investing more in Momentum and Size would reduce active risk by around 0.01% per country and style. All other MCAR values are virtually zero or positive, meaning that active risk could only be reduced by shifting out of highly positive MCAR factors and shifting into less positive MCAR factors. This analysis is vice versa true if active risk was meant to be increased instead.

Risk Profile: Sector Portfolio vs. Benchmark
The top 10 holdings of the portfolio are in the Industrials, Consumer Staples, Health Care, Telecommunication Services and Information Technology sectors. According to the economic analysis, both industrial and consumer staples are good sectors to invest in a recession time; also, these companies are multinational so they can make profits in outside the European zone.

Table 8. Top 10 weights for Sector portfolio

The bottom 10 percentage holdings are shown in the next graph.

Table 9. Bottom 10 weights for Sector portfolio
The total active weight of the Sector portfolio is 90.59%. This number indicates that the portfolio is 90.59% over-weighted compared to the benchmark.
In terms of active weight (the weight of an asset in the sector portfolio minus the weight of the asset in the benchmark MSCI Europe Index), the more over-weighted sectors are Industrials, Consumer Staples and Health Care. Compared to the rest of the sectors present in this portfolio, there is a huge bet on Industrials sector, coinciding to the last stage of a recession period.

Table 10. Active weights by sectors The Total Risk of the Sector Portfolio is 19.48, meaning that the portfolio has a two-thirds probability of falling within 19.48% of its expected return over the next year. The Active Total Risk of the sector portfolio is 3.74, meaning that it has a two-thirds probability of falling within 3.74% of the benchmark. The Benchmark Total Risk is 19.90, so the Sector Portfolio is a less risky portfolio.
According to the Barra report, 99.99% of the Sector portfolio active risk arises from local market risk. Of the 99.99% of local market risk, 68.83% can be explained by Common factor risk and 31.16% by Selection Risk. In respect to Common factor risk, it can be divided by 33.83% in Industry risk, 43.88% in Style risk and -8.87% from Factor Interaction.

Table 11. Risk decomposition graph for Sector portfolio
The big percentage of Common factor risk can be due because 52.88% of the Active Weight of this portfolio is allocated in just two sectors: Industrials and Consumer Staples; within the Common factor risk, Style risk has the biggest percentage. The countries allocation is more diversified and the two countries with major Active Weight represent 39.31% of the portfolio, which explain the lower level of Selection Risk in the portfolio.
The previous graph shows that the portfolio is well diversified, and in fact, factor and market interaction contribute to decrease the total active risk. Style risk and industry risk are contributing to the active risk, mainly due because this portfolio has been constructed for an determined group of industries and is not replicating the benchmark itself.
Biggest contributors to Local Market Risk are United Kingdom and Germany, explaining 75.34% of the Active Local Market Risk which is 3.74. United Kingdom’s risk comes from Common factor risk (2.73) with Industry as the greater contributor; Germany’s risk comes also from Common factor risk with also Industry as the greater contributor.
In the case of United Kingdom, the active exposure information can be seen in the next graph. Food Staples and Retailing, and Energy Equipment and Services are the most overweight British industries, but there is underweight in other industries as well.

Table 12. Factor exposures for Great Britain in Sector portfolio
For Germany, active exposures are smaller than British ones; and in this case, the portfolio has more underweight industries in this country; in fact, there are only 13 German stocks in the portfolio and 11 of them have active weights of less than 1%. The more important active exposures are in German Machinery, Pharmaceuticals and Food and Staples Retailing Industries.

Table 13. Factor exposures for Germany in Sector portfolio
Currency risk of the sector portfolio is contributing to 3.88% of the Active Risk, which is bigger than that of the Benchmark, 2.69%. The biggest exposures in the Sector portfolio are to Euro and British Pound currencies; for the Euro, compared with the Benchmark, is overweight by 9.77% and underweight by 7.79% for the British Pound. The portfolio is also underweight for Swiss Franc, Danish Krone and Norwegian Krone; in terms of currency, this appears to be a diversified portfolio.
In terms of Marginal Contribution to Total Risk of the portfolio, the three biggest contributors are Austrian Metals, Finland Autos and Components and French Metals; all these three factors are absent in the portfolio, but an increase in these stocks of 1% would increase the risk of the portfolio in almost 24% for each factor. This result shows that the portfolio has efficiently excluded risky factors and, in general, there are small exposures for the factors contributing more to Total Risk.
In terms of Marginal Contribution to Active Risk, there are no factors that might increase the total Active Risk. All the factors have zero or negative values in the Marginal Contribution to Active Risk, meaning that an increase in their exposures will have no effect or even decrease the Active Risk of the portfolio.

Active Risk management
To decrease Active Risk in the Sector portfolio, the weight of Great Britain Banks could be increased by 1% and the active risk of the portfolio would be decreased by 0.08%, this is the factor that would have a stronger marginal effect in decreasing the active risk. Also, an increase of 1% in the weight of Banking Industry of Germany, Spain, Italy or France would decrease the active risk by 0.06% each, holding all else constant. This is not surprising given that all the Banking Industry is completely excluded from this sector portfolio, so adding some exposures to banks would diversify it.

Changes in Net Asset Value for Country and Sector Portfolios The percentage change in NAV from 5th to 26th September 2012 was 2.11% for the benchmark compared to 3.45% for the country portfolio and 3.35% for the sector portfolio.

Conclusion In this project I created two actively managed portfolios and analysed their risk profiles, with the MSCI Europe Index as the benchmark. Yet the selection procedure that gave rise to active risk also lessened the benefits of diversification. For the country portfolio this issue was most pronounced for currency risk, as over- or underweighting some countries created currency exposures which were less diversified. Especially because the benchmark has a large exposure to the British Pound, if the investor does not want exposure to the UK, the portfolio will exhibit a high currency risk when compared to the benchmark. On the other hand, this might be a desired outcome, or the exposure can be hedged in the foreign exchange markets. Similarly, for the sector portfolio the problem was most visible in selection risk, which by definition can be diversified away, since leaving out entire industries means that the assets remaining in the portfolio are likelier to be more closely correlated. Diversification also proved to be a difficulty during the optimisation step. Apart from the limitation to just 150 assets, much tweaking to country and sector weights was required to find two portfolios that maintained a sufficiently high active risk after optimisation, since the software attempted to achieve maximum diversification benefits, often reducing active risk below 3% as the optimised portfolio was made more similar to the benchmark. Consequently, reducing (increasing) active risk requires adjusting assets weights in a manner that make them more (less) similar to the benchmark weights, yet because the benchmark is highly diversified, an actively managed portfolio will usually have a lower level of diversification.

Bibliography
INSEE, 2012. Goods and Services: Supply and uses chain-linked volumes. http://www.insee.fr/en/themes/info-rapide.asp?id=28 [accessed 18 December 2012]
INSEE, 2012. The unemployment rate. http://www.insee.fr/en/themes/info-rapide.asp?id=14&date=20120906 [accessed 18 December 2012]
IMF, 2012. Norway: Gross domestic product, constant prices. http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2012/02/weodata/weorept.aspx?sy=2010&ey=2017&scsm=1&ssd=1&sort=country&ds=.&br=1&pr1.x=52&pr1.y=12&c=142&s=NGDP_RPCH&grp=0&a= [accessed 18 December 2012]
Statistics Norway, 2012. Economic trends for Norway and abroad. http://www.ssb.no/kt_en/ [accessed 18 December 2012].
OECD, 2012. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Outlook 2012
QFinance, 2012. Healthcare and pharmaceuticals. [Online] Available at: http://www.qfinance.com/sector-profiles/healthcare-and-pharmaceuticals [Accessed: 15 December 2012]
The Economist, 2011. The future of healthcare in Europe. The Economist Intelligence Unit Limited 2011.

Appendix 1. Benchmark Risk Profile

Appendix 2. Country Portfolio Data A.2.1 Country Weights

A.2.2 Country Portfolio Risk Profile

Appendix 3. Sector Portfolio Data A.3.1 Sector Weights

A.3.2 Sector Portfolio Risk Profile

Appendix 4. Changes in Net Asset Values

--------------------------------------------
[ 1 ]. The countries included Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, and the United Kingdom
[ 2 ]. Figures from Trading Economics…...

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Active Portfolio Management

...with success? The short answer is: our readers. We have been extremely gratified by Active Portfolio Management's reception in the investment community. The book seems to be on the shelf of every practicing or aspiring quantitatively oriented investment manager, and the shelves of many fundamental portfolio managers as well. But while our readers have clearly valued the book, they have also challenged us to improve it. Cover more topics of relevance to today. Add empirical evidence where appropriate. Clarify some discussions. The long answer is that we have tried to improve Active Portfolio Management along exactly these dimensions. First, we have added significant amounts of new material in the second edition. New chapters cover Advanced Forecasting (Chap. 11), The Information Horizon (Chap. 13), Long/Short Investing (Chap. 15), Asset Allocation (Chap. 18), The Historical Record for Active Management (Chap. 20), and Open Questions (Chap. 21). Some previously existing chapters also cover new material. This includes a more detailed discussion of risk (Chap. 3), dispersion (Chap. 14), market impact (Chap. 16), and academic proposals for performance analysis (Chap. 17). Second, we receive exhortations to add more empirical evidence, where appropriate. At the most general level: how do we know this entire methodology works? Chapter 20, on The Historical Record for Active Management, provides some answers. We have also added empirical evidence about the......

Words: 306 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Portfolio Management

...investors to choose the most perfect securities. In a portfolio construction a person analysis the whole macro as well as micro economic scenario of a nation, in industry analysis the industry condition, movement is closely examined and in a company analysis the specific firm is analyzed to take a decision. This are steps of fundamental analysis.. In this report all this are performed on ten firms. Our selected firms are from different industries. All of these companies’ shares are category A shares in DSE. We have collected our necessary information from primary and secondary sources. In our entire report we try to focus on portfolio construction from an investor’s perspective. We have divided the topics of the report into different segments. First we have discussed about the origin of the report, objectives and scope of the study, the method of preparing the report, limitation of the study. Then we have chosen the companies. At first we did the macro economic analysis, than industry analysis and last company analysis. Then we constructed the portfolio including with and without short sells. After all analysis we have given our suggestion as well as findings and conclude our report with a conclusion. ------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------- 1.1 ORIGIN OF THE REPORT As a partial requirement of B.B.A. program we are required to study the “Portfolio Management” course. In the classroom we get the opportunity......

Words: 2939 - Pages: 12

Premium Essay

Investment Strategy and Portfolio Management

...INVESTMENT STRATEGY AND PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT Executive Summary Kaplan is a charitable fund established in 2007 to provide an investment vehicle for investors seeking to finance some educational objectives. The aim of the fund is to grow members’ contributions through investment in securities. Investors in Kaplan are yet to start making withdrawals from the fund but are due to begin in June 2012. This report looks at current issues in the investment environment in the UK, Europe, and the rest of the world which have an impact on Kaplan’s operations. It also examines strategic asset allocation and investment strategies that Kaplan should employ to achieve its goals. In addition, the report recommends areas in which the fund’s management should actively manage investments and those areas in which passive management would be the better option. Overview of the Investment Environment In recent years, the global fund sector has continued to register robust growth in many countries with developed financial markets. Collective investment schemes are becoming the most preferred investment vehicles for investors because of their obvious advantages including diversification, professional management of investments, liquidity and investment advice for investors and superior returns (Roll, 2008). Indeed, as by the end of 2011, the global investment fund industry was worth US $11.7 trillion which translates to 17 percent of primary securities holdings around the world.......

Words: 2861 - Pages: 12

Premium Essay

Style Drift and Portfolio Management for Active

...Drift and Portfolio Management for Active Australian Equity Funds † Andrew B. Ainsworth ∗ Kingsley Fong David R. Gallagher Current Draft: 30 April 2007 Australian School of Business, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, N.S.W. 2052 Abstract Using monthly active equity fund portfolio holdings, we examine the magnitude of style drift and decompose it into active and passive components. We find that while fund style tilts are consistent with their self-stated investment objective, there is variation in the degree of style bias within style groups. We document that funds actively adjust their portfolio holdings in response to passive style drift to retain a desired portfolio tilt. The degree of adjustment varies with the frequency over which the drift is measured, with funds being most responsive to changes in book-to-market and momentum drift. We also find that certain types of style drift affect portfolio turnover. Keywords: Investment style, style drift, consistency, portfolio management, investment performance. † This research was funded through an ARC Linkage Grant (LP0561160) involving Vanguard Investments Australia and SIRCA. The authors thank Adrian Lee and an anonymous referee for helpful comments and suggestions. We also thank Vanguard Investments Australia for research support. ∗ Corresponding author. Email: andrew.ainsworth@student.unsw.edu.au. Electronic copy available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1004670 Style Drift and Portfolio Management......

Words: 16463 - Pages: 66

Premium Essay

Portfolio Management

...PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT PLAN ROUGH DRAFT PROJ 587 ADVANCED PROGRAM MANAGEMENT DEVRY UNIVERSITY, KELLER GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MANAGEMENT MAR 29, 2015 TOPIC: Mortgage banking XYZ Company The purpose of this project is to develop and enhance our managerial skills in the area of portfolio management technique. This paper will focus on the portfolio managements plan utilized in the area of mortgage banking industry. Our team decided to create a pseudo company that will mimic similar companies like Chase Mortgage Banking etc. The three projects used in the development of this portfolio plan include: • Compliance Management Systems • Loan Origination Systems • Modification Assistance These projects can also be classified as programs for the purpose of this paper and it was meticulously selected due to it value and also it interconnectivity with each other as we manage the portfolio plan. OVERVIEW: Chase is the U.S. consumer and commercial banking business of JPMorgan Chase & Co. (NYSE: JPM), a leading global financial services firm with assets of $2.3 trillion and operations in more than 60 countries. They are the neighborhood banks for thousands of communities across the country. Chase serve approximately one of out of every six Americans through more than 5,500 bank branches; 18,000 ATMs; mortgage offices; online and mobile banking; as well as relationships with auto dealerships, schools and universities. • Serves 21 million households with consumer...

Words: 1088 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Developing Countries vs Developed Countries

...The emergence of developed countries as major players in global business has made it more difficult for developing countries to succeed Contents The emergence of developed countries as major players in global business has made it more difficult for developing countries to succeed 1 1. Introduction 1 2. Global business of Developed Countries vs. Developing Countries 1 3. Role of International Organizations 2 4. Role of NAFTA 2 5. FDI and Global Business 3 6. Conclusion 4 References 4 1. Introduction Developing economies consist of a very diverse sort of group that includes some of large economies enjoying high economic growth rates like that of China, INDIA AND Brazil and many small economies having low rates of economic growth. The countries having high GDP growth among group of developing nations have remained able to sustain the negative impacts of financial crises very well as these were not that much affected by consequences of financial crises. There are few small or middle income economies that are quite rigid in a way that these nations depend on specific factors for development (Kose, 2013). Keeping in view the GDP growth rates of group of countries in a globe it cannot be said that developing countries do not have room for business growth but that fact is these do not have competitive advantage that can match those of developed nations and that is the reason I agree with the statement that “The emergence of developed countries as major players in......

Words: 1782 - Pages: 8

Premium Essay

Risk Management in Banking Sector

...Risk management in banking sector Table of content Particulars | Page no. | Executive summary | | Introduction | | Literature review | | Research methodology | | Sampling techniques | | Tools of analysis | | Data analysis & findings | | Conclusions | | Scope for further research | | Reference | | Executive Summary Today, The Indian Economy is in the process of becoming a world class economy. The Indian banking industry is making great advancement in terms of quality, quantity, expansion and diversification and is keeping up with the updated technology, ability, stability and thrust of a financial system, where the commercial banks play a very important role, emphasize the very special need of a strong and effective control system with extra concern for the risk involved in the business. Globalization, Liberalization and Privatization have opened up a new methods of Financial transaction where risk level is very high. In banks and financial institutions risk is considered to be the most important factor of earnings. Therefore they have to balance the Relationship between risk and return. In reality we can say that management of financial institution is nothing but a management of risk managing financial risk systematically and professionally becomes an even more important task. Rising global competition, increasing deregulation, introduction of innovative products and delivery channels have pushed risk management to the......

Words: 26880 - Pages: 108

Premium Essay

Active Portfolio Management Strategy

...Definition: In an active portfolio strategy, a manager uses financial and economic indicators along with various other tools to forecast the market and achieve higher gains than a buy-and-hold (passive) portfolio. Tracking error is a measure of how closely a portfolio follows the index to which it is benchmarked. The most common measure is the root-mean-square of the difference between the portfolio and index returns. Many portfolios are managed to a benchmark, normally an index. Some portfolios are expected to replicate, before trading and other costs, the returns of an index exactly (an index fund), while others are expected to 'actively manage' the portfolio by deviating slightly from the index in order to generate active returns or to lower transaction costs. Tracking error (also called active risk) is a measure of the deviation from the benchmark; the aforementioned index fund would have a tracking error close to zero, while an actively managed portfolio would normally have a higher tracking error. Dividing portfolio active return by portfolio tracking error gives the information ratio, which is a risk adjusted performance metric. If tracking error is measured historically, it is called 'realised' or 'ex post' tracking error. If a model is used to predict tracking error, it is called 'ex ante' tracking error. The former is more useful for reporting performance, whereas ex ante is generally used by portfolio managers to control risk. The individual investors who......

Words: 3376 - Pages: 14

Premium Essay

Risk Management in Banking Sector

...CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION 1. THEME OF THE STUDY Risk management underscores the fact that the survival of an organization depends heavily on its capabilities to anticipate and prepare for the change rather than just waiting for the change and react to it. The objective of risk management is not to prohibit or prevent risk taking activity, but to ensure that the risks are consciously taken with full knowledge, purpose and clear understanding so that it can be measured and mitigated. It also prevents an institution from suffering unacceptable loss causing an institution to suffer or materially damage its competitive position. Functions of risk management should actually be bank specific dictated by the size and quality of balance sheet, complexity of functions, technical/ professional manpower and the status of MIS in place in that bank. 1.2 INTRODUCTION Risk: the meaning of ‘Risk’ as per Webster’s comprehensive dictionary is “a chance of encountering harm or loss, hazard, danger” or “to expose to a chance of injury or loss”. Thus, something that has potential to cause harm or loss to one or more planned objectives is called Risk. The word risk is derived from an Italian word “Risicare” which means “To Dare”. It is an expression of danger of an adverse deviation in the actual result from any expected result. Banks for International Settlement (BIS) has defined it as- “Risk is the threat that an event or action will adversely affect an organization’s......

Words: 9309 - Pages: 38

Premium Essay

Active vs. Passive Euthanasia

...Active vs. Passive Euthanasia 1. Question What is the difference between active and passive euthanasia and is one form better or worse than the other when it comes to ending someone’s life? 2. Introduction There are a few differences between active and passive euthanasia. Active euthanasia involves assisting someone that is dying so they die quicker and painlessly. Whereas, passive euthanasia involves letting someone that is sick die by not prolonging their life with medication. It does not involve “killing” them, but instead letting their ailment take them more slowly. Is one of these methods more humane than the other when someone is dying? Is it more acceptable to let someone suffer for a longer period of time? Or would it be better to assist someone that is dying to end his or her life with dignity? 3. Position Statement Someone that is ready to die should be allowed to chance to die with dignity and with active euthanasia, as long as they are in the right frame of mind to make that decision. 4. Supporting Reason Allowing someone that is terminally ill or dying to die with dignity gives respect to the person in his or her last days. If someone is dying and they want to end their life, and not suffer, they should be allowed to have help from doctors to make that decision. The alternative would be to have them suffer for the remainder of their days, waiting for their time to die. This can cause depression and feelings of hopelessness. Not a good......

Words: 350 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Portfolio Management

...Portfolio Management Financial Investment Management March 28, 2016 Introduction There are many different approaches people can take in order to get started on making preparations for retirement. Some people decide to have their savings stored away in the privacy of their own homes, some may open an interest bearing savings account, and the other type of people start to make investments. According to Gitman, an investment is defined as simply any asset into which funds can be placed with the expectation that it will generate positive income and/ or preserve or increase its value. Investments can come in different forms and depending on whether you chose to invest in, being a company or a government entity, will determine the type of investments you will have access to. (2011). One of the types of investments are securities and they could be issued by firms, a government entity, or other organization. The most common of these are either stocks or bonds, also in some instances stock options are available as well. Property, another investment type, comes in the form of real property or personal tangible personal property like gold, artwork, antiques, and things of that nature. There is a type of an investment know as direct and indirect investments. How to differentiate between the two is direct investment is where the investor directly acquires a claim on a security or property, while with an indirect investment is when a collection of securities or properties are...

Words: 2111 - Pages: 9

Premium Essay

Portfolio Management

... Section 4. Portfolio Breakdown Industry Diversification Portfolio Beta Section 5. Investment Results Portfolio Performance vs. Benchmark Indices Section 6. Summary Section 1. Objective and Strategy Introduction The JMYJ Equity Fund (the “Fund” or the “portfolio”) is an equity fund with an initial capitalization of $100,000. The Fund is managed by a group of four xxxxxx Graduate School of Business students. The Fund made its first investments on September 12, 2010. This report covers the period from September 12, 2010 until November 8, 2010. Throughout this report we refer to this period as the “investment period”. Investment Objective The Fund is allocated so that it may accomplish three objectives: growth of capital and the conservation both principal and current income. Investment Strategies The Fund invests primarily in common stocks. Selection of the Fund’s assets was based on a top-down investment approach. Based on our macro analysis, we decided to invest approximately 75% of the fund in equity securities issued by companies domiciled in North America and 25% of the fund in equity securities issued by companies domiciled outside of North America. Next we determined the sectors in which the Fund was to be invested. We used Value Line Investment Survey to assist in identifying attractive industry sectors. Our Value Line industry analysis produced two appealing sectors, Railroads......

Words: 4456 - Pages: 18

Premium Essay

Customer Portfolio Management

...CUSTOMER PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT – The construct and performance Harri Terho Sarja/Series A-4:2008 Copyright © Harri Terho & Turun kauppakorkeakoulu ISBN 978-951-564-592-0 (nid.) 978-951-564-593-7 (PDF) ISSN 0357-4652 (nid.) 1459-4870 (PDF) UDK 658.8 658.89 658.8.012.2 Esa Print Tampere, Tampere 2008 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Writing this dissertation has been a huge learning experience. Over the years I have received great support from a large number of people. I wish to thank everyone who has helped me to make and complete this interesting journey. I would like to start with my supervisor, Professor Aino Halinen-Kaila. She encouraged me to begin working on the dissertation in the first place. She has always given me great freedom in my work, and has supported my occasionally unconventional research decisions. The numerous projects and discussions with her have really been an intellectual joy and also helped me to make progress. Aino, thank you: I would not be here without your contribution. I was honored to have Professor Thomas Ritter from the Copenhagen Business School and Professor Olli Kuivalainen of the University of Lappeenranta as the official examiners of my thesis. They gave me valuable and constructive comments on the manuscript. My colleagues have given me great support in completing the thesis. I wish to express my gratitude to Professor Rami Olkkonen, Professor (emer.) Helena Mäkinen, Professor Leila Hurmerinta-Peltomäki, Dr. Juha......

Words: 75762 - Pages: 304

Premium Essay

Portfolio Management

...| Portfolio Management | INVESTMENT PLAN | Introduction: We have been provided with €1,000,000 to invest for a client not familiar with the concept of investing in stocks or aware of the current market trends. Given his lack of knowledge, our objective is to try and ensure a good enough return on the investments we make based on a period of seven weeks. By setting up an account on Yahoo! Finance, we will monitor our investments and all results will be reported in Euros. Our Client: The different stages in the life cycle are a primary reason for investors to adapt a particular attitude towards risk and that attitude defines the whole portfolio of an investor. An investor in his mid-30s will have a distinctive attitude than someone in his mid-40s or 60s, because the needs and demands differ throughout the stages in our life cycle. Our client, in his mid-40s, is at a stage in life where his personal goals in life revolve around taking care of the family. Demands such as day to day expenses, educational expenses for his children, various insurances and bills as well as retirement contributions are examples of needs that need to be fulfilled. Due to his poor knowledge and skill concerning portfolio management, portfolio optimization, security analysis and asset allocation, he has decided to knock on our door to manage his cash. Our client would like to play it safe in order to get a return which is stressed as a preparation for a better life during his......

Words: 1059 - Pages: 5

Free Essay

Investment Portfolio Management

...|IPM Project Report | | | | | |Investment Portfolio Creation | |using | | | |Investment Philosophy – of Joel Greenblatt’s | |[pic] | | | | | | ...

Words: 6544 - Pages: 27