Free Essay

All in the Family

In: Film and Music

Submitted By jjjohnson74jr
Words 2105
Pages 9
“All in the Family”

Archie Bunker, America’s favorite old school racist is standing in his kitchen star struck by the presence of Sammy Davis Jr. The musician agrees to pose for a picture with Archie and as soon as the countdown to snap it ended, Davis puckered up his lips and laid a kiss on Archie’s cheek (All in the Family S02E21)! The look Archie Bunker had on his face said it all, it was the kiss heard around the world and one of televisions funniest and most profound moments. The television sitcom “All in the Family” aired on prime time CBS from 1971 to 1979. The 1970s were a time of social unrest; a social war between the old school and the new schools of thought. This was a time where racism, homophobia, and gender were fiercely debated in every household across the country while they were ignored on television. Archie Bunker was played by Caroll O’Connor and he was the main character. “All in the Family” used the forever hot topics of racism, homosexuality, and gender inequality in America as an overarching theme, which taught to people just how ridiculous and baseless those beliefs were while keeping viewers of all backgrounds entertained. As the story goes, Archie Bunker is a working class family man with a very strong set of conservative and often unfair views of the world. Bunker clashes with just about every person he comes into contact with on the show including his wife, strangers, random people and most of all his son in law, Mike Stivic or “Meathead” as Archie refers to him. The son in law Mike Stivic was played by Rob Reiner and joining him was Sally Struthers as Archie’s daughter, Mrs. Gloria Bunker – Stivic as well as Jean Stapleton; Mrs. Edith Bunker. If you have ever seen the show, Jean Stapleton’s voice was that of the stereotypical annoying housewife. Mrs. Bunker along with her daughter Gloria and son in law Mike would almost constantly clash with Archie because he was beyond stubborn and refused to accept any truths besides the ones in which he was set in believing.
In order to understand the significance of this television show we must analyze its background as well as the context it was seen in during the 1970’s, a decade of social upheaval. The United States was still embroiled in a war against communism inside North Vietnam and stateside, racism was ever present as riots broke out all over the country as well as demonstrations and rallies for homosexual equality. For older people who grew up during the 1920’s (like Archie Bunker for instance) the world appeared as if it was going down the drain. We must understand that for these people who were born during a much different time, changes in traditional morals and values whether right or wrong was very frightening. The brilliance of this television show lies in the fact that whether you hated or loved the character of Archie Bunker, you watched anyway because you wanted to understand and see what this crazy man would do or say next. “All in the Family” can and should be credited for shows we enjoy today such as South Park, The Simpsons, and Family Guy (to note a few of the many) that examine social issues through comedy. What separates the television sitcoms of the sixties from “All in the Family” is that they did not include or talk about these events on their shows. The top ten sitcoms of 1968 included “Family Affair”, “The Lucy Show” and “The Beverly Hillbillies” which were situational comedies based on traditional family values. There was never any discussion of real world problems such as divorce, women’s rights, abortion, bigotry and race. Family television sitcoms included a traditional family with a father who was head of the household and a mother who stayed home and raised the children. “All in the Family” is similar to previous sitcoms in that single way. There was no problem or controversy that could not be fixed before the end of the show. These sitcoms of the prior decade were entertaining and funny of course, but they lacked the ability or position to teach or introduce us anything related to reality.
“All in the Family” was a hysterical situational comedy which also brought to light many of the social issues which during the mid 20th century were left alone, swept under a rug, or hidden in a closet. Everyone during this time knew of the problems our American society was facing, however, they were never really “put out” on display for people to discuss in school or work the following day. This show did just that, it shed light onto some of our deepest wounds and touchiest issues and made it be known that it was okay to highlight these issues and get people talking to raise awareness. Now there is considerable doubt among professional critics that this was the main goal of the creators of “All in the Family,” but it was a pleasant indirect result of the show. There is something that sets “All in the Family” apart from the numerous other sitcoms of this period in American history. This new show incorporated what was really going on in our country, it wasn’t sugarcoating anything or proposing that we live in a fantasy land like other shows did. “All in the Family,” produced by Norman Lear and based on the U.K. comedy Till Death Do Us Part, was groundbreaking in its social relevance with regard to contemporary issues of race, class, gender, sexual orientation, and politics, among others” (Collins 1). Norman Lear described his show’s opening by saying, “We followed a whole bunch of shows like “Father Knows Best”, “Leave It to Beaver”, “Green Acres”, and other shows of the 60’s. They were fine shows, but you would think by watching them that America had no blacks, no racial tensions, and that there was no Vietnam” (Ozersky 64).
What “All in the Family” did was groundbreaking and often referred to as prosocial. Brown and Arvind, authored the Communications Quarterly article “Ethical Dilemmas of Prosocial Television.” In their research, they found that “The series focused on prejudices through the depiction of a highly bigoted character, Archie Bunker… the program intended to point out to viewers the absurdities of their own ethnic prejudices…” (Brown 276). Furthermore, they also discovered that “Viewers of these two [one being “All in the Family”] became more aware of racial issues” (Brown 276). Although Brown and Arvind stated that “All in the Family” addressed racism and exposed it, they also believed that it had no effect on righting those ill perceived views. In some instances, they said “… already prejudiced viewers became even more steadfast in their beliefs” (Brown 276). A debate on how people responded to the multitude of societal subjects shown on this particular show would be irrelevant because we simply do not have data to do so. Millions of people had watched this show throughout the 1970s and millions more over the ensuing decades through re-runs and purchasing the series. What we can substantially state though is, that “All in the Family” taught Americans about racism and social inequalities while entertaining them. “All in the Family” was a major breakthrough in American entertainment industry. It was in fact, the first television situation comedy to draw it’s material and plots directly from current social issues and political controversy. As the media scholars Horace Newcomb and Robert Alley said “…something of a time bomb” (Montgomery 28). The two heralded critics referred to this show as a time bomb simply because of the controversy surrounding the shows main character, Archie Bunker. As discussed earlier, the character Archie Bunker and his bigoted ways came during a pretty turbulent decade.
Kathryn Montgomery wrote extensively about how this show was originally perceived in her book “Target: Prime Time: Advocacy Groups and the Struggle Over Entertainment Television.” Montgomery provides an excellent recount of the initial impact that the show “All in the Family” had on American viewers: “Within three months of its premier in January of 1971, “All in the Family” had addressed the issues of homosexuality, miscarriage, race, female inequality, and cohabitation” (Montgomery 28). She further goes on to note that although the show was not an instant success, it did however climb to the top of the ratings chart after the initial season. As this show grew in popularity, so did the voices of opposition. With his vocabulary limited to racial slurs such as “spics, spooks, spades, schwarzes, coons, coloreds, and chinks” it is not difficult to imagine why so many would be drawn into such a politically incorrect show – it was unheard of and no one knew what Archie Bunker would do or say next (Montgomery 29).
Not to anyone’s surprise either, it is also during this time we see the emergence of many national anti – defamation leagues and committees springing up such as the Anti Defamation League of B’nai B’rith and the Polish American Cultural Society. These groups had been around long before the television show “All in the Family,” but were now gaining more attention as well as gaining a larger sounding board for educating and informing people of their respective causes.
Did this television show upset both viewers and non viewers from diverse backgrounds? Of course it did. Did this television show entertain viewers of diverse backgrounds while teaching the masses about the ridiculousness of bigotry through one out of touch man? The answer is you bet it did. One could argue that not only did “All in the Family” teach people just how wrong racism was while keeping viewers of all backgrounds entertained, it also revolutionized the communication, entertainment, and society as a whole.
In a 1972 article from TIME Magazine, we can see this pattern shift in television programming occur as a result of “All in the Family,” “TV has embarked on a new era of candor, with all the lines empathetically drawn in. During the season that began last week, programmers will actually be competing with each other to trace the largest number of touchy – and heretofore forbidden – ethnic, sexual, and psychological themes. Religious quirks, wife swapping, child abuse, lesbianism, venereal disease – all the old taboos will be toppling” (“The Team Behind Archie Bunker & Co.”). “All in the Family” had an enormous impact on television and entertainment as a whole. This show pretty much took all of the previous norms and rules and threw them out the window. After this show, other more controversial shows sprang up such as “Maude.”
The living rooms, school bus stops, classrooms, workplaces, etc. were buzzing about what was said the night before when that newest episode of “All in the Family” had aired. Discussions whether about love and appreciation or a deep disdain in the show resulted in two sure things. First and foremost, people of all backgrounds were entertained by how foolish, politically incorrect, and out of touch the character Archie Bunker was, whether they applauded his racist ways or despised him and laughed at his ignorance. Secondly and most importantly, Americans were finally receiving a gift from television which was the linkage of real life problems and programming which in turn sparked debate, education, dismissal of xenophobic and conservative beliefs having to do with racism, women’s inequality, homophobia, AIDs, ethnicity, politics, etc. “All in the Family” was extremely successful as far as entertaining it’s viewers while teaching them about the societal issues which older generations did not introduce into television or any form of communication for that matter.

Works Cited

All in the Family S02E21. Perf. Carroll O'Connor, Jean Stapleton, Rob Reiner & Sally Struther - Guest Star: Sammy Davis Jr. CBS, 1972. Web.
Brown, William J., and Arvind Singhal. "Ethical Dilemmas of Prosocial Television." Communication Quarterly: 268-80. Print.
Collins, Kathleen. "The Trouble with Archie: Locating and Accessing Primary Sources for the Study of the 1970s U S Sitcom , All in the Family." CUNY Academic Works Fall 2010 (2010). Web. 9 May 2015. .
Montgomery, Kathryn C. Target: Prime Time: Advocacy Groups and the Struggle Over Entertainment Television. New York: Oxford UP, 1989.
Newcomb, Horace, and Paul Hirsch. "Television as a Cultural Form." Quarterly Review of Film Studies (1983): 561-69. Web. 7 May 2015.
Ozersky, Josh. TV in an Era of Change 1968 – 1978. Southern Illinois University Press, 2003.

Unknown Author. "The Team Behind Archie Bunker & Co." TIME Magazine 25 Sept. 1972. Web.,8599,165245,00.html

Similar Documents

Premium Essay

Holy Family as the Model of All Families

...simplicity mistakes of first Family close the door of paradise and human race drowned into super complexity but merciful god shown us the road to paradise se through another family . the master carpenter who created this universe born in the of a cattle shed of Bethlehem in a cold December doors of heavens opened a good news for all races grace of god shined as star above that cave blessed mary and joseph praise the lord in silence there begins an exceptional family in the history of man kind . in this family came into the world grew and was brought up the son of god. Conceived and born of a virgin mother and fatherly care of joseph holy family of Nazareth is a reference for all families in the world from this family we can learn lessons of true harmony love and obedience and faith in god. If a family loses faith in god it s loses its harmony and true love fades family loses its meaning . the history of holy family mentioned very little in the pages of gospel but the life of jesus is self explanatory about the goodness of his family the home of nazreth is the school where we begin to understand the life of jesus joseph the foster father of jesus husband of mary he is the patron saint of all families holy gospel tells he is man of justice he put his love in work he acted out his love and he lived ini t his life is devoted to god .he never complains he never argued he just obeyed the gods commands . blessed virgin is a model for all Christians who want to......

Words: 461 - Pages: 2

Premium Essay

Using Information from Item a and Else Where, Assess the View That ‘the Nuclear Family Functions to Benefit All Its Members and Society as a Whole.’

...nuclear family functions to benefit all its members and society as a whole.’ (24 marks) According to Item A the nuclear family is the “ideal family type.” According to Murdock the nuclear family consists of a heterosexual couple that have at least one child. Murdock is a functionalist. Functionalists argue society is based on consensus (agreed norms and values). Consensus is achieved in society through the process of socialisation, which involves individuals learning norms and values. Norms and values are transmitted to children through social institutions such as the nuclear family. This benefits all members of society as it prevents anomie (chaos) and because it encourages social integration and social solidarity. Murdock argues that the family benefits all members of society as it performs four essential functions (sexual, economic, reproduction and socialization). Similarly Parsons argues that the family has two irreducible functions (primary socialization and stabalising adult personalities). Another functionalist, Fletcher, argues that the family performs three essential functions (regulation of sexual behavior; reproduction and child-rearing and home provisions). However, Marxists (such as Marx and Engels) argue that individuals don’t benefit from society, only the bourgeoisie benefits. Feminists (such as Liberal and radical feminists) criticize the functionalist view of the nuclear family and argue that women are ignored. Murdock claimed that the nuclear family......

Words: 955 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Personal Essay

...Blended Families Kendra Harmon ENG121: English Composition I Elizabeth Myers February 2, 2015 I am the fifth child of seventeen children. This has happened because I have a blended family, my father remarried and my step mother had five children from a previous marriage, and my mother has remarried to my step father who has seven children from his previous marriages. My parents divorced when I was thirteen years old, and have now remarried to spouses who have children of their own from previous marriages. By working as a family unit on both sides, mother and father as well as stepmother and stepfather, the family can stay strong and become a big happy family instead of two separate families. Having a blended family takes a lot of work from both the sides of both the parents and the children because of the hardships on the family when the mother and father divorce, then meeting and getting to know the new family members, and learning to work with the new family members as one whole family unit instead of two separate families. The hardships on the family when the mother and father divorce can hurt the family structure but as long as everyone works together it can be rebuilt to be a healthier relationship for everyone involved. With my family, we had a rough divorce process and we had a lot of hate within the family. My brother, sister, and I grew closer together when the divorce happened and our bond was strengthened as we were unsure of what was to come but with hard......

Words: 1030 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Heritage Assessment

...beliefs that may or may not impact an individuals care. The heritage assessment tool has been used to compare three different cultured families, health traditions, addressing health maintenance, health protection, and health restoration. During the interview process with the three different cultured families, the heritage assessment tool was very helpful in determining the similarities and differences of each family. The twenty-nine questions asked in the heritage assessment tool gave the families room to elaborate and open up about certain beliefs. This tool is a great method that is used in hospital settings to help determine ones cultural beliefs. Nurses need to be aware of the different cultures to help provide good care. The heritage assessment tool helps provide information about each culture and how to provide good quality care to their liking. The first interview conducted was with an American family (The Bigelow’s) that has no religious beliefs. The family consists of both parents, and four children. All of which were born in the United States. The Bigelow family keeps in contact with one another on a daily basis. They also see extended family on a monthly basis. Growing up the Bigelow’s were very involved with their health maintenance. They all saw a physician on a yearly basis for check ups and to obtain any vaccinations that were due. All members of this...

Words: 977 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Revision Support

...The Family - Murdock Murdock Functionalist; family is universal institution that performs 4 major functions: * Stable Satisfaction of the Sex Drive - prevents social disruption caused by sexual 'free-for-all'. * Reproduction of Next Generation - means society able to continue. * Socialisation of the Young - spreading society's norms and values. * Meeting Member's Economic Needs - providing food, shelter, etc. Criticisms of Murdock * Marxists - reject consensus view; argue that Murdock neglects dark side of family. Claim meets needs of capitalists, not family. * Feminists - reject consensus, 'rose-tinted' view, argue that Murdock ignores women's oppression and inequality. See family as serving needs of men and exploiting women. The Family - Parsons Parsons Functionalist; family has 2 'basic and irreducible' functions: * Primary Socialisation of Children - happens in early stages of child's life; child learns norms, values, etc of culture they are born into. * Stabilisation of Adult Personalities - family provides place for adults to relax, escape stresses of working life and feel emotionally secure. Criticisms of Parsons * Too deterministic - children are moulded by all-powerful adults. Also ignores possibility of socialisation being 2-way process where by socialisation can be resisted by children. * Zaretsky - family only provides such emotional support so members can spend another day under harsh capitalist oppression. Family......

Words: 3130 - Pages: 13

Premium Essay

Assess Sociological Explanations of the Nature and Extent of Family Diversity Today. (24 Marks)

...of the nature and extent of family diversity today. (24 marks) In today's society, there are various alternatives from the typical family type. The top examples of these are lone-parent, cohabitation and reconstituted. But there are also some others such as same sex couples, single parent and multi-cultural families. There has been a decrease in the number of nuclear families in the UK and an increase in various other families such as single parent families. But the raise in single parent households has to do with the increase in divorce across the UK which means that more people are left having to support their children on their own unless they become a reconstituted family. Functionalists are classed as modernists when it comes to their opinions on family diversity in post-modern UK. But they also see modern society as clear-cut, fixed and predictable. They think that the best and strongest family type is the nuclear family. The main functionalist who is focused on is Parsons. He came up with the functional fit, which is where pre-industrial society and the extended family changed into industrial society and the nuclear family. He also believes that the nuclear family meets all of society’s needs the best unlike any of the other diverse family types which society has to offer. Functionalists see all other family types as inadequate, abnormal or deviant. This shows that they don’t think that any other family type other than the nuclear family will benefit society and......

Words: 861 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Kbdvnklsv Akvl Va Lk

...through the big arched window and saw all the birds scared flying high. B. In the east, I hear women say “marriage is faith”. C. Arranged marriages lead to the reinforcement of family values, reduce the rate of divorce, and strengthen the bonding between the couple. ii. Lead to the reinforcement of family values A. Couples are dependent on their family 1. Parents arrange marriage 2. Society values marriage B. Family members have responsibilities 1. When fights take place 2. Parents could get the blame iii. Reduces divorce rate A. Similarities between spouses 1. Similar views on family and marriage 2. Couples will focus on each other B. Places more emphasis on the practical 1. Primary emphasis is not on love, sex, and physical beauty 2. Lets couples focus on building a great family iv. Strengthen the bonding between couples A. Similar cultures or religion 1. No problems... Outline i. Introduction A. As the church bell rang I looked through the big arched window and saw all the birds scared flying high. B. In the east, I hear women say “marriage is faith”. C. Arranged marriages lead to the reinforcement of family values, reduce the rate of divorce, and strengthen the bonding between the couple. ii. Lead to the reinforcement of family values A. Couples are dependent on their family 1. Parents arrange marriage 2. Society values marriage B. Family members have responsibilities......

Words: 8269 - Pages: 34

Premium Essay


...the nuclear family functions to benefit all its members and society as a whole. A nuclear family can be defined as a unit consisting of a father, mother and their dependant children. There are many views against and for the nuclear family from a consensus perspective, a class perspective and a gender conflict perspective. The consensus sociologists, new right and functionalists, believe that the best and only type of family is the traditional, nuclear family. In contrast, the class and gender conflict sociologists, Marxists and feminists, argue that it meets the need of capitalism, not those of family members or society as a whole and see the family as serving the needs of men and oppressing women (feminists view). To evaluate the functions of the family, I will look into the different perspectives before any conclusions are made. The views of the functionalists are positive and see the nuclear family as the dominant family in society that meet the needs of all members of the family. Furthermore, as functionalists see the family as a particularly important sub-system- a basic block of society, functionalist sociologist George peter Murdock (1949) put forward three points that was mentioned in item 1. Item 1 suggests the family providing three basic functions: “stable satisfaction of sexual needs”, “ production and rearing of children” and “provision of a home”. These three points were put forward by Murdock while he put forward the case that the nuclear family is the......

Words: 802 - Pages: 4

Free Essay

Military Deployment and the Effects on Their Family Members

...Military Deployment and the effects on their family members Martin C. Weiss Eng/147 2/02/15 Patricia Nereim This is My Daughter, Julie Katilyn Weiss and her boyfriend LCPL Dillon G. Lackus is a U.S Marine Military Police Officer and LCPL Lackus is stationed at Camp Hanson, Okinawa, Japan. Military Deployment and the effects on their Family Members In America, the weight of the wars of Iraq and Afghanistan falls heavily upon military families. In fact, military families are living the new normal.”What that really means is that this,” intense life of repeated deployments, of prosthetics, of memorial services, this is what life is going to look like for us from now on, so we had better learn to deal with it. ( (Lyden, 2009) It’s a shame, that every military family has to deal with the decision of what their child has decided to do just coming out of high school. The good-bye until the next time is the hardest because they waited so long to see them. And it goes by so fast that the next thing you know they have to go back. Family members are faced with emptiness when that day comes; when their families and friends watch them walk away with......

Words: 1121 - Pages: 5

Premium Essay

Advantages and Disadvantages of Living in a Joint Family in a joint family A joint family was a phenomena found only in India of the bygone days. This really meant that, the parents with all their children and grandchildren stayed together under one single roof. This system could prevail for decades for several reasons. First and foremost, all the children stayed in the same town as, no one went out of the town to another distant town in search of a job. This made it possible for all children to remain in town, and that also in the same house. Secondly, and more importantly, the sons and daughters-in-law were all treated as one family. * you get complete support of family members when ever needed, your children will not left out alone at home when you go for a job, you can share your joys and sorrows with them. * the only drawback of joint family is that you don't get that much freedom and privacy as you can get in nuclear family. you cant hide anything as u r in joint family ..what ever u want to keep secret....everyone can find no privacy. (D) * Another benefit, we don't have to ask for help from others if all family members are living together. Each and every person will share their opinions and take a good decision. * no independent decision making.... * One may enjoy a joint family if there is a good thinking among the members of the family. if not it becomes very hard to sustain the joint family as there will be discrimination arising. So basic pillar of joint family is to have......

Words: 761 - Pages: 4

Premium Essay

Assess the Contribution of Functionalism to Our Understanding of Families and Households. (24)

...functions of the family Assess the contribution of functionalism to our understanding of families and households. (24) Functionalists take a consensus view of the role of family. They see it as a universal institution that performs essential functions for society as a whole and all members of the family. According to Murdock, it provides important sub-system that provides stable satisfaction for the sex drive and therefore avoids social disruption. As well as this, Murdock says the family reproduces the next generation and thus ensuring current society to continue. Parsons sees a functional fit with the nuclear family fitting modern society’s needs for a geographically and socially mobile labour force. However critics argue that he is wrong about the relationship between industrialisation and family structure. Moreover Marxists, Liberal, radical and Marxist feminist all view the functions of the family in different ways, this essay will assess the different perspectives in which all these groups view the functions of the family. Functionalists believe that society is based on a value consensus- as set of shared norms and values; into which society socialises its members. This enables them to cooperate harmoniously to meet society’s needs and achieve shared goals. They regard society as system made up of different parts or sub-systems that depend on each other, such as the family, the education system and the economy. Factionalists also see the family as a particularly...

Words: 1561 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Examine Different Sociological Views on the Family

...All families are unique. A few decades ago, the most common type of family was the mother and father living with their unmarried children. Today, families are vastly different including more single-parent households than ever before, stepfamilies, and adopted families, and grandparents raising their grandchildren, as well as young married couples having to move back in with their parents because they do not have the money to afford their own living arrangements yet. Whatever type of family you have there are different perspectives in which to view it. While the perspectives differ greatly from one another, the family still remains one of the most important social institutions along with health-care, religion, education, mass media, politics, and economy. Family is defined as, 'a basic social unit consisting of parent and their children, considered as a group, whether living together or not.' While every family is unique, there are similarities and differences within each family, no matter what perspective you are using. Each theory shows a different type of assumptions and defines a certain way of understanding a social institution, from all four unique perspectives. Functionalists believe that society is based on a value consensus, into which society socialise its members. They regard society as a system made up of different parts or sub-systems that depend on each other. Functionalists often compare society to a human body – without one organ, the body wouldn’t function,......

Words: 1750 - Pages: 7

Premium Essay

Business Plan Project

...1.0 Executive Summary All in One Family Healthcare will provide the best care to every patient every day, at affordable pricing and in a family oriented environment. All in One Family Healthcare’s objectives include increasing consumer awareness of the importance of healthcare, making a profit within the first two or three years of operation, and franchising the company within seven years of operation. All-In-One Family Healthcare is a medical clinic that provides five services in one convenient location. Our medical division tends to basic healthcare needs such as annual check ups, physicals, minor blood work and common ailments. Other divisions within the clinic include pharmacy, optometry and dental services. All in One development will include the franchising of the company resulting in more All in One’s in North Carolina and eventually taking our business nationwide. Ultimately All in One plans to have locations in all major cities and operate as one of the nation’s most profitable and recognized health care facilities. All in One FHC will be open Monday-Friday from the hours of 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. The pharmacy department will remain open until 2:00 a.m. All in One will be closed on holidays such as Christmas, New Year, MLK Day, Memorial Day, etc. All in One Family Healthcare will have a simple management strategy. Since this is an LLC, the company will be run by the various owners and orders shall follow down the chain of command outlined in this section of......

Words: 3682 - Pages: 15

Free Essay


... GENDER: Please circle: family/individual NAME: GENDER: Please circle: family/individual Part 2: Questionnaire & Proposal This survey is to investigate the community’s knowledge and utilisation of support networks that assist families. Please fill out the following details. 1. What type of support services are you aware of in your local community? * Mental support services * Children support services * Family support services * Indigenous support services 2. Have you ever been involved with a family support network of any kind? If so, what organisation? 3. On a scale of 1-10 how effective do you think support networks in general are and give reasons? 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 4. If you have used or will use in the future, what type of support network do you think will help you best? * Online help * Face-to-face help * Phone help * Written help 5. If your family needed assistance would you reach out to a support network? Why/why not? 6. Identify 3 support networks that assist families in your local area. 7. What would be one barrier stopping you from seeking help from a family support network? * Lack of confidence * Guilt of cause * Insecurity * Personal issues 8. If you needed family support, what would you look for in a support......

Words: 678 - Pages: 3

Premium Essay

Corporate Goverance

...5 Tangible Benefits Governance challenges For Family-owned businesses Implementing Tangible Benefits Motivation Implementing Purpose Alignment Family Business Challenges Planning What To Do Family Business Challenges What To Do KEY MESSAGES To an extent, family control yields benefits. Academic research and experience from many companies and investors all show that a certain degree of family ownership/control provides positive benefits to the family business and its shareholders. Family-owned firms face unique challenges. However, many failures of family-owned companies indicate that such firms also face a multitude of challenges which risk destroying shareholder value or even the business itself. Corporate governance measures lead to long-term success and keep peace in the family. Corporate governance measures at the family and business levels provide good solutions to family ownership challenges and often are indispensable to the long-term success of the family business    nd peace in the controlling family, especially with succeeding generations. —a “…We have two options; there is no right or wrong decision, nor one that is better than the other. But whatever is to be done, will be definitive. There is no turning back. We can continue being a family business, like in my grandfather’s and father’s days, or become a professional company with a strong and clear capital market strategy.” —David Feffer, Suzano, Chairman......

Words: 9157 - Pages: 37